Conflicts
=========
Text conflict in .bzr-mysql/default.conf
Text conflict in libmysqld/CMakeLists.txt
Text conflict in libmysqld/Makefile.am
Text conflict in mysql-test/collections/default.experimental
Text conflict in mysql-test/extra/rpl_tests/rpl_row_sp006.test
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/binlog/r/binlog_tmp_table.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_loaddata.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_loaddata_fatal.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_row_create_table.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_row_sp006_InnoDB.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_stm_log.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl_ndb/r/rpl_ndb_circular_simplex.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl_ndb/r/rpl_ndb_sp006.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/t/mysqlbinlog.test
Text conflict in sql/CMakeLists.txt
Text conflict in sql/Makefile.am
Text conflict in sql/log_event_old.cc
Text conflict in sql/rpl_rli.cc
Text conflict in sql/slave.cc
Text conflict in sql/sql_binlog.cc
Text conflict in sql/sql_lex.h
21 conflicts encountered.
NOTE
====
mysql-5.1-rpl-merge has been made a mirror of mysql-next-mr:
- "mysql-5.1-rpl-merge$ bzr pull ../mysql-next-mr"
This is the first cset (merge/...) committed after pulling
from mysql-next-mr.
Backporting BUG#43789 to mysql-5.1-bugteam
The replication was generating corrupted data, warning messages on Valgrind
and aborting on debug mode while replicating a "null" to "not null" field.
Specifically the unpack_row routine, was considering the slave's table
definition and trying to retrieve a field value, where there was nothing to be
retrieved, ignoring the fact that the value was defined as "null" by the master.
To fix the problem, we proceed as follows:
1 - If it is not STRICT sql_mode, implicit default values are used, regardless
if it is multi-row or single-row statement.
2 - However, if it is STRICT mode, then a we do what follows:
2.1 If it is a transactional engine, we do a rollback on the first NULL that is
to be set into a NOT NULL column and return an error.
2.2 If it is a non-transactional engine and it is the first row to be inserted
with multi-row, we also return the error. Otherwise, we proceed with the
execution, use implicit default values and print out warning messages.
Unfortunately, the current patch cannot mimic the behavior showed by the master
for updates on multi-tables and multi-row inserts. This happens because such
statements are unfolded in different row events. For instance, considering the
following updates and strict mode:
(master)
create table t1 (a int);
create table t2 (a int not null);
insert into t1 values (1);
insert into t2 values (2);
update t1, t2 SET t1.a=10, t2.a=NULL;
t1 would have (10) and t2 would have (0) as this would be handled as a
multi-row update. On the other hand, if we had the following updates:
(master)
create table t1 (a int);
create table t2 (a int);
(slave)
create table t1 (a int);
create table t2 (a int not null);
(master)
insert into t1 values (1);
insert into t2 values (2);
update t1, t2 SET t1.a=10, t2.a=NULL;
On the master t1 would have (10) and t2 would have (NULL). On
the slave, t1 would have (10) but the update on t1 would fail.
Backporting BUG#38173 to mysql-5.1-bugteam
The reason of the bug was incompatibile with the master side behaviour.
INSERT query on the master is allowed to insert into a table without specifying
values of DEFAULT-less fields if sql_mode is not strict.
Fixed with checking sql_mode by the sql thread to decide how to react.
Non-strict sql_mode should allow Write_rows event to complete.
todo: warnings can be shown via show slave status, still this is a
separate rather general issue how to show warnings for the slave threads.
A fix and a test case for Bug#34898 "mysql_info() reports 0 warnings
while mysql_warning_count() reports 1"
Review the patch by Chad Miller, implement review comments
(since Chad left) and push the patch.
This bug is actually not a bug. At least according to Monty.
See Bug#841 "wrong number of warnings" reported back in July 2003
and closed as "not a bug".
mysql_info() was printing the number of truncated columns, not
the number of warnings.
But since the message of mysql_info() was "Warnings: <number of truncated
columns>", people would expect to get the number
of warnings in it, not the number of truncated columns.
So a possible fix would be to change the message of mysql_info()
to say Rows changed: <n>, truncated: <m>.
Instead, put the number of warnings there. That is, remove the
feature that thd->cuted_fields (the number of truncated fields)
is exposed to the client. The number of truncated columns can be
calculated on the client, by analyzing SHOW WARNINGS output,
and in future we may remove thd->cuted_fields altogether.
So let's have one less thing to worry about.
Add an option to control whether the master should keep waiting
until timeout when it detected that there is no semi-sync slave
available.
The bool option 'rpl_semi_sync_master_wait_no_slave' is 1 by
defalt, and will keep waiting until timeout. When set to 0, the
master will switch to asynchronous replication immediately when
no semi-sync slave is available.
Semi-sync status were not reset by FLUSH STATUS, this was because
all semi-sync status variables are defined as SHOW_FUNC and FLUSH
STATUS could only reset SHOW_LONG type variables.
This problem is fixed by change all status variables that should
be reset by FLUSH STATUS from SHOW_FUNC to SHOW_LONG.
After the fix, the following status variables will be reset by
FLUSH STATUS:
Rpl_semi_sync_master_yes_tx
Rpl_semi_sync_master_no_tx
Note: normally, FLUSH STATUS itself will be written into binlog
and be replicated, so after FLUSH STATS, one of
Rpl_semi_sync_master_yes_tx
Rpl_semi_sync_master_no_tx
can be 1 dependent on the semi-sync status. So it's recommended
to use FLUSH NO_WRITE_TO_BINLOG STATUS to avoid this.
Semi-sync uses an extra connection from slave to master to send
replies, this is a normal client connection, and used a normal
SET query to set the reply information on master, which is visible
to user and may cause some confusion and complaining.
This problem is fixed by using the method of sending reply by
using the same connection that is used by master dump thread to
send binlog to slave. Since now the semi-sync plugins are integrated
with the server code, it is not a problem to use the internal net
interfaces to do this.
The master dump thread will mark the event requires a reply and
wait for the reply when the event just sent is the last event
of a transaction and semi-sync status is ON; And the slave will
send a reply to master when it received such an event that requires
a reply.
To-number conversion warnings work differenly with CHAR
and VARCHAR sp variables.
The original revision-IDs are:
staale.smedseng@sun.com-20081124095339-2qdvzkp0rn1ljs30staale.smedseng@sun.com-20081125104611-rtxic5d12e83ag2o
The patch provides ER_TRUNCATED_WRONG_VALUE warning messages
for conversion of VARCHAR to numberic values, in line with
messages provided for CHAR conversions. Conversions are
checked for success, and the message is emitted in case
failure.
The tests are amended to accept the added warning messages,
and explicit conversion of ON/OFF values is added for
statements checking system variables. In test
rpl.rpl_switch_stm_row_mixed checking for warnings is
temporarily disabled for one statement, as this generates
warning messages for strings that vary between executions.
The issue appears when number of heartbeat events non-zero before start of test
block. But really we need to check that no new events has received during test block.
So I did following:
1. Replace absolute values by diff of values
2. Increase heartbeat period from 1.5 to 5 sec
Let
- T be a transactional table and N non-transactional table.
- B be begin, C commit and R rollback.
- N be a statement that accesses and changes only N-tables.
- T be a statement that accesses and changes only T-tables.
In RBR, changes to N-tables that happen early in a transaction are not immediately flushed
upon committing a statement. This behavior may, however, break consistency in the presence
of concurrency since changes done to N-tables become immediately visible to other
connections. To fix this problem, we do the following:
. B N N T C would log - B N C B N C B T C.
. B N N T R would log - B N C B N C B T R.
Note that we are not preserving history from the master as we are introducing a commit that
never happened. However, this seems to be more acceptable than the possibility of breaking
consistency in the presence of concurrency.
CHANGE MASTER TO command required the value for RELAY_LOG_FILE to
be an absolute path, which was different from the requirement of
MASTER_LOG_FILE.
This patch fixed the problem by changing the value for RELAY_LOG_FILE
to be the basename of the log file as that for MASTER_LOG_FILE.
The problem is that there is only one autoinc value associated with
the query when binlogging. If more than one autoinc values are used
in the query, the autoinc values after the first one can be inserted
wrongly on slave. So these autoinc values can become inconsistent on
master and slave.
The problem is resolved by marking all the statements that invoke
a trigger or call a function that updated autoinc fields as unsafe,
and will switch to row-format in Mixed mode. Actually, the statement
is safe if just one autoinc value is used in sub-statement, but it's
impossible to check how many autoinc values are used in sub-statement.)
rpl_slave_skip fails randomly on PB2. This patch fixes the failure by
setting explicit wait for SQL thread to stop, instead of the
wait_for_slave_to_stop mysqltest command, after a start until command
is executed.
We cann connect() in a non-blocking mode to be able to specify a
non-standard timeout.
The problem was that we did not fetch the status from the
non-blocking connect(). We assumed that poll() would not return
a POLLIN flag if the connect failed. But on some platforms this
is not true.
After a successful poll() we do now retrieve the status value
from connect() with getsockopt(...SO_ERROR...). Now we do know
if (and how) the connect failed.
The test case for my investigation was rpl.rlp_ssl1 on an
Ubuntu 9.04 x86_64 machine. Both, IPV4 and IPV6 were active.
'localhost' resolved first for IPV6 and then for IPV4. The
connection over IPV6 was blocked. rpl.rlp_ssl1 timed out
as it did not notice the failed connect(). The first read()
failed, which was interpreted as a master crash and the
connection was tried to reestablish with the same result
until the retry limit was reached.
With the fix, the connect() problem is immediately recognized,
and the connect() is retried on the second resolution for
'localhost', which is successful.
NOTE: Backporting the patch to next-mr.
The fix proposed in BUG#35542 and BUG#31665 introduces a performance issue
when fsyncing the master.info, relay.info and relay-log.bin* after #th events.
Although such solution has been proposed to reduce the probability of corrupted
files due to a slave-crash, the performance penalty introduced by it has
made the approach impractical for highly intensive workloads.
In a nutshell, the option --syn-relay-log proposed in BUG#35542 and BUG#31665
simultaneously fsyncs master.info, relay-log.info and relay-log.bin* and
this is the main source of performance issues.
This patch introduces new options that give more control to the user on
what should be fsynced and how often:
1) (--sync-master-info, integer) which syncs the master.info after #th event;
2) (--sync-relay-log, integer) which syncs the relay-log.bin* after #th
events.
3) (--sync-relay-log-info, integer) which syncs the relay.info after #th
transactions.
To provide both performance and increased reliability, we recommend the following
setup:
1) --sync-master-info = 0 eventually the operating system will fsync it;
2) --sync-relay-log = 0 eventually the operating system will fsync it;
3) --sync-relay-log-info = 1 fsyncs it after every transaction;
Notice, that the previous setup does not reduce the probability of
corrupted master.info and relay-log.bin*. To overcome the issue, this patch also
introduces a recovery mechanism that right after restart throws away relay-log.bin*
retrieved from a master and updates the master.info based on the relay.info:
4) (--relay-log-recovery, boolean) which enables a recovery mechanism that
throws away relay-log.bin* after a crash.
However, it can only recover the incorrect binlog file and position in master.info,
if other informations (host, port password, etc) are corrupted or incorrect,
then this recovery mechanism will fail to work.
vs not null
NOTE: Backporting the patch to next-mr.
The replication was generating corrupted data, warning messages on Valgrind
and aborting on debug mode while replicating a "null" to "not null" field.
Specifically the unpack_row routine, was considering the slave's table
definition and trying to retrieve a field value, where there was nothing to be
retrieved, ignoring the fact that the value was defined as "null" by the master.
To fix the problem, we proceed as follows:
1 - If it is not STRICT sql_mode, implicit default values are used, regardless
if it is multi-row or single-row statement.
2 - However, if it is STRICT mode, then a we do what follows:
2.1 If it is a transactional engine, we do a rollback on the first NULL that is
to be set into a NOT NULL column and return an error.
2.2 If it is a non-transactional engine and it is the first row to be inserted
with multi-row, we also return the error. Otherwise, we proceed with the
execution, use implicit default values and print out warning messages.
Unfortunately, the current patch cannot mimic the behavior showed by the master
for updates on multi-tables and multi-row inserts. This happens because such
statements are unfolded in different row events. For instance, considering the
following updates and strict mode:
(master)
create table t1 (a int);
create table t2 (a int not null);
insert into t1 values (1);
insert into t2 values (2);
update t1, t2 SET t1.a=10, t2.a=NULL;
t1 would have (10) and t2 would have (0) as this would be handled as a
multi-row update. On the other hand, if we had the following updates:
(master)
create table t1 (a int);
create table t2 (a int);
(slave)
create table t1 (a int);
create table t2 (a int not null);
(master)
insert into t1 values (1);
insert into t2 values (2);
update t1, t2 SET t1.a=10, t2.a=NULL;
On the master t1 would have (10) and t2 would have (NULL). On
the slave, t1 would have (10) but the update on t1 would fail.
NOTE: this is the backport to next-mr.
This patch addresses the bug reported by checking wether
host argument is an empty string or not. If empty, an error is
reported to the client, otherwise continue normally.
This commit is based on the originally proposed patch and adds
a test case as requested during review as well as refines comments,
and makes test case result file less verbose (compared to previous patch).
NOTE: this is the backport to next-mr.
When using replication, the slave will not log any slow query logs queries
replicated from the master, even if the option "--log-slow-slave-statements"
is set and these take more than "log_query_time" to execute.
In order to log slow queries in replicated thread one needs to set the
--log-slow-slave-statements, so that the SQL thread is initialized with the
correct switch. Although setting this flag correctly configures the slave
thread option to log slow queries, there is an issue with the condition that
is used to check whether to log the slow query or not. When replaying binlog
events the statement contains the SET TIMESTAMP clause which will force the
slow logging condition check to fail. Consequently, the slow query logging will
not take place.
This patch addresses this issue by removing the second condition from the
log_slow_statements as it prevents slow queries to be binlogged and seems
to be deprecated.
