Index lookup does not always guarantee that we can
simply remove the relevant conditions from the WHERE
clause. Reasons can be e.g. conversion errors,
partial indexes etc.
The optimizer was removing these parts of the WHERE
condition without any further checking.
This leads to "false positives" when using indexes.
Fixed by checking the index reference conditions
(using WHERE) when using indexes with sub-queries.
Loose index scan does the grouping so the temp table does
not need to do it, even when sorting.
Fixed by checking if the grouping is already done before
doing sorting and grouping in a temp table and do only
sorting.
checked for each record'
The problem was in incorrectly calculated length of the buffer used to
store a hexadecimal representation of an index map in
select_describe(). This could result in buffer overrun and stack
corruption under some circumstances.
Fixed by correcting the calculation.
The columns in HAVING can reference the GROUP BY and
SELECT columns. There can be "table" prefixes when
referencing these columns. And these "table" prefixes
in HAVING use the table alias if available.
This means that table aliases are subject to the same
storage rules as table names and are dependent on
lower_case_table_names in the same way as the table
names are.
Fixed by :
1. Treating table aliases as table names
and make them lowercase when printing out the SQL
statement for view persistence.
2. Using case insensitive comparison for table
aliases when requested by lower_case_table_names
UNIQUE (eq-ref) lookups result in table being considered as a "constant" table.
Queries that consist of only constant tables are processed in do_select() in a
special way that doesn't invoke evaluate_join_record(), and therefore doesn't
increase the counters join->examined_rows and join->thd->row_count.
The patch increases these counters in this special case.
NOTICE:
This behavior seems to contradict what the documentation says in Sect. 5.11.4:
"Queries handled by the query cache are not added to the slow query log, nor
are queries that would not benefit from the presence of an index because the
table has zero rows or one row."
No test case in 5.0 as issue shows only in slow query log, and other counters
can give subtly different values (with regard to counting in create_sort_index(),
synthetic rows in ROLLUP, etc.).
The bug is a regression introduced by the fix for bug30596. The problem
was that in cases when groups in GROUP BY correspond to only one row,
and there is ORDER BY, the GROUP BY was removed and the ORDER BY
rewritten to ORDER BY <group_by_columns> without checking if the
columns in GROUP BY and ORDER BY are compatible. This led to
incorrect ordering of the result set as it was sorted using the
GROUP BY columns. Additionaly, the code discarded ASC/DESC modifiers
from ORDER BY even if its columns were compatible with the GROUP BY
ones.
This patch fixes the regression by checking if ORDER BY columns form a
prefix of the GROUP BY ones, and rewriting ORDER BY only in that case,
preserving the ASC/DESC modifiers. That check is sufficient, since the
GROUP BY columns contain a unique index.
tables or more
The problem was that the optimizer used the join buffer in cases when
the result set is ordered by filesort. This resulted in the ORDER BY
clause being ignored, and the records being returned in the order
determined by the order of matching records in the last table in join.
Fixed by relaxing the condition in make_join_readinfo() to take
filesort-ordered result sets into account, not only index-ordered ones.
The fix for bug 31148 is not correct. It does not
have a relation to the problem described in this bug.
And removing the fix will not make the bug to re-appear.
Fixed the bug #31974 by removing the fix for bug 31148
and adding a test case.
The HAVING clause is subject to the same rules as the SELECT list
about using aggregated and non-aggregated columns.
But this was not enforced when processing implicit grouping from
using aggregate functions.
Fixed by performing the same checks for HAVING as for SELECT.
Assertion `table->key_read == 0' failed.
The problem was that key_read on a table in a sub-select was not
properly reset. That happens because the code responsible for that
is copy&pasted all around the server. In some place, it was obviously
forgotten to be pasted.
The fix is to reset key_read properly.
bitmap_is_set(table->write_set, fiel
Problem: creating a temporary table we allocate the group buffer if needed
followed by table bitmaps (see create_tmp_table()). Reserving less memory for
the group buffer than actually needed (used) for values retrieval may lead
to overlapping with followed bitmaps in the memory pool that in turn leads
to unpredictable consequences.
As we use Item->max_length sometimes to calculate group buffer size,
it must be set to proper value. In this particular case
Item_datetime_typecast::max_length is too small.
Another problem is that we use max_length to calculate the group buffer
key length for items represented as DATE/TIME fields which is superfluous.
Fix: set Item_datetime_typecast::max_length properly,
accurately calculate the group buffer key length for items
represented as DATE/TIME fields in the buffer.
A rule was introduced by the 5.1 part of the fix for bug 27531 to
prefer filesort over indexed ORDER BY when accessing all of the rows of a
table (because it's faster). This new rule was not accounting for the
presence of a LIMIT clause.
Fixed the condition for this rule so it will prefer filesort over
indexed ORDER BY only if no LIMIT.
when used in a VIEW.
The problem was that wrong function (create_tmp_from_item())
was used to create a temporary field for Item_func_sp.
The fix is to use create_tmp_from_field().
