The first step for deprecating innodb_autoinc_lock_mode(see MDEV-27844) is:
- to switch statement binlog format to ROW if binlog format is MIXED and
the statement changes autoincremented fields
- issue warnings if innodb_autoinc_lock_mode == 2 and binlog format is
STATEMENT
When transaction creates or drops temporary tables and afterward its statement
faces an error even the transactional table statement's cached ROW
format events get involved into binlog and are visible after the transaction's commit.
Fixed with proper analysis of whether the errored-out statement needs
to be rolled back in binlog.
For instance a fact of already cached CREATE or DROP for temporary
tables by previous statements alone
does not cause to retain the being errored-out statement events in the
cache.
Conversely, if the statement creates or drops a temporary table
itself it can't be rolled back - this rule remains.
There is a case when implicit primary key may be changed when removing
NOT NULL from the part of unique key. In that case we update
modified_primary_key which is then used to not skip key sorting.
According to is_candidate_key() there is no other cases when primary
kay may be changed implicitly.
When transaction creates or drops temporary tables and afterward its statement
faces an error even the transactional table statement's cached ROW
format events get involved into binlog and are visible after the transaction's commit.
Fixed with proper analysis of whether the errored-out statement needs
to be rolled back in binlog.
For instance a fact of already cached CREATE or DROP for temporary
tables by previous statements alone
does not cause to retain the being errored-out statement events in the
cache.
Conversely, if the statement creates or drops a temporary table
itself it can't be rolled back - this rule remains.
Add KEYWORDS table and SQL_FUNCTIONS table to INFORMATION_SCHEMA.
This commits needs some minor changes when propagated upwards
(e.g. func_array in item_create.cc has a termination element that
doesn't exist in later versions of MariaDB)
The only call of the virtual member function
handler::update_table_comment() was removed in
commit 82d28fada7 (MySQL 5.5.53)
but the implementation was not removed.
The only non-trivial implementation was for InnoDB. The information
is now returned via handler::get_foreign_key_create_info() and
ha_statistics::delete_length.
Problem:
=======
In slave_parallel_mode=optimistic configuration, when admin commands and
DML operation on the same table are scheduled simultaneously for execution,
it results in lock conflict and slave server either hangs due to
deadlock or goes down with an assert.
Analysis:
========
Admin commands OPTIMIZE, REPAIR and ANALYZE are written to binary log as
ordinary transactions. When 'slave_parallel_mode' is 'optimistic' DMLs are
allowed to run in parallel. But these locks are not detected by parallel
replication deadlock detection-and-handling mechanism. At times they result
in deadlock or assertion.
Fix:
===
Flag admin commands as DDL in Gtid_log_event at the time of writing to
binary log. Add a new bit EXECUTED_TABLE_ADMIN_CMD to
'm_unsafe_rollback_flags'. During 'mysql_admin_table' command execution it
accepts a list of tables to be processed and executes them in a loop. Upon
successful execution enable 'EXECUTED_TABLE_ADMIN_CMD' bit in
thd->transaction.stmt_unsafe_rollback_flags. Gtid_log_event constructor
will notice this flag and mark the current transaction with 'FL_DDL' flag.
Gtid_log_events marked as FL_DDL will not be scheduled parallel execution,
on the slave. They will execute in isolation to prevent deadlocks.
Note: Removed the call to 'trans_commit_implicit' from 'mysql_admin_table'
function as 'mysql_execute_command' will take care of invoking
'trans_commit_implicit'.
This is a backport of
commit fd9ca2a742 (MDEV-23295) and
commit 9a156e1a23 (MDEV-23345) to 10.3.
An instant ADD/DROP/reorder column could create a dummy table
object with the wrong ROW_FORMAT when innodb_default_row_format
was changed between CREATE TABLE and ALTER TABLE.
prepare_inplace_alter_table_dict(): If we had promised that
ALGORITHM=INPLACE is supported, we must preserve the ROW_FORMAT.
The rest of the changes are related to adding
Alter_inplace_info::inplace_supported to cache the return value of
handler::check_if_supported_inplace_alter().
When doing a truncate on an Innodb under lock tables, InnoDB would rename
the old table to #sql-... and recreate a new 't1' table. The table lock
would still be on the #sql-table.
When doing ALTER TABLE, Innodb would do the changes on the #sql table
(which would disappear on close).
When the SQL layer, as part of inline alter table, would close the
original t1 table (#sql in InnoDB) and then reopen the t1 table, Innodb
would notice that this does not match it's own (old) t1 table and
generate an error.
Fixed by adding code in truncate table that if we are under lock tables
and truncating an InnoDB table, we would close, reopen and lock the
table after truncate. This will remove the #sql table and ensure that
lock tables is using the new empty table.
Reviewer: Marko Mäkelä
The idea of this fix is that it's enough to prevent the
next_auto_inc_val from incrementing if an error, to fix this problem
and also the MDEV-17333.
So this patch basically reverts the existing fix to the MDEV-17333.
This follows up commit
commit 94a520ddbe and
commit 7c5519c12d.
After these changes, the default test suites on a
cmake -DWITH_UBSAN=ON build no longer fail due to passing
null pointers as parameters that are declared to never be null,
but plenty of other runtime errors remain.
When using field_conv(), which is called in case of field1=field2 copy in
fill_records(), full varstring's was copied, including unitialized bytes.
This caused valgrind to compilain about usage of unitialized bytes when
using Aria static length records.
Fixed by not using memcpy when copying varstrings but instead just copy
the real bytes.
MDEV-20578 Got error 126 when executing undo undo_key_delete
upon Aria crash recovery
The crash happens in this scenario:
- Table with unique keys and non unique keys
- Batch insert (LOAD DATA or INSERT ... SELECT) with REPLACE
- Some insert succeeds followed by duplicate key error
In the above scenario the table gets corrupted.
The bug was that we don't generate any undo entry for the
failed insert as the whole insert can be ignored by undo.
The code did however not take into account that when bulk
insert is used, we would write cached keys to the file on
failure and undo would wrongly ignore these.
Fixed by moving the writing of the cache keys after we write
the aborted-insert event to the log.
- Inplace alter shouldn't set default date column as '0000-00-00' when
table is not empty. So mysql_inplace_alter_table() copied
alter_ctx.error_if_not_empty to a new field of Alter_inplace_info.
In ha_innobase::check_if_supported_inplace_alter() should check the
error_if_not_empty flag and return INPLACE_NOT_SUPPORTED if the table
is not empty
was restored.
Optionally rollback prepared XA's on "mariabackup --prepare".
The fix MUST NOT be ported on 10.5+, as MDEV-742 fix solves the issue for
slaves.
* do not allow versioned table to be without versioned (non-system) fields
* prohibit changing field versioning, when removing table versioning
* handle CREATE...SELECT as well
MySQL 5.7.9 (and MariaDB 10.2.2) introduced a race condition
between InnoDB transaction commit and the conversion of implicit
locks into explicit ones.
The assertion failure can be triggered with a test that runs
3 concurrent single-statement transactions in a loop on a simple
table:
CREATE TABLE t (a INT PRIMARY KEY) ENGINE=InnoDB;
thread1: INSERT INTO t SET a=1;
thread2: DELETE FROM t;
thread3: SELECT * FROM t FOR UPDATE; -- or DELETE FROM t;
The failure scenarios are like the following:
(1) The INSERT statement is being committed, waiting for lock_sys->mutex.
(2) At the time of the failure, both the DELETE and SELECT transactions
are active but have not logged any changes yet.
(3) The transaction where the !other_lock assertion fails started
lock_rec_convert_impl_to_expl().
(4) After this point, the commit of the INSERT removed the transaction from
trx_sys->rw_trx_set, in trx_erase_lists().
(5) The other transaction consulted trx_sys->rw_trx_set and determined
that there is no implicit lock. Hence, it grabbed the lock.
(6) The !other_lock assertion fails in lock_rec_add_to_queue()
for the lock_rec_convert_impl_to_expl(), because the lock was 'stolen'.
This assertion failure looks genuine, because the INSERT transaction
is still active (trx->state=TRX_STATE_ACTIVE).
The problematic step (4) was introduced in
mysql/mysql-server@e27e0e0bb7
which fixed something related to MVCC (covered by the test
innodb.innodb-read-view). Basically, it reintroduced an error
that had been mentioned in an earlier commit
mysql/mysql-server@a17be6963f:
"The active transaction was removed from trx_sys->rw_trx_set prematurely."
Our fix goes along the following lines:
(a) Implicit locks will released by assigning
trx->state=TRX_STATE_COMMITTED_IN_MEMORY as the first step.
This transition will no longer be protected by lock_sys_t::mutex,
only by trx->mutex. This idea is by Sergey Vojtovich.
(b) We detach the transaction from trx_sys before starting to release
explicit locks.
(c) All callers of trx_rw_is_active() and trx_rw_is_active_low() must
recheck trx->state after acquiring trx->mutex.
(d) Before releasing any explicit locks, we will ensure that any activity
by other threads to convert implicit locks into explicit will have ceased,
by checking !trx_is_referenced(trx). There was a glitch
in this check when it was part of lock_trx_release_locks(); at the end
we would release trx->mutex and acquire lock_sys->mutex and trx->mutex,
and fail to recheck (trx_is_referenced() is protected by trx_t::mutex).
(e) Explicit locks can be released in batches (LOCK_RELEASE_INTERVAL=1000)
just like we did before.
trx_t::state: Document that the transition to COMMITTED is only
protected by trx_t::mutex, no longer by lock_sys_t::mutex.
trx_rw_is_active_low(), trx_rw_is_active(): Document that the transaction
state should be rechecked after acquiring trx_t::mutex.
trx_t::commit_state(): New function to change a transaction to committed
state, to release implicit locks.
trx_t::release_locks(): New function to release the explicit locks
after commit_state().
lock_trx_release_locks(): Move much of the logic to the caller
(which must invoke trx_t::commit_state() and trx_t::release_locks()
as needed), and assert that the transaction will have locks.
trx_get_trx_by_xid(): Make the parameter a pointer to const.
lock_rec_other_trx_holds_expl(): Recheck trx->state after acquiring
trx->mutex, and avoid a redundant lookup of the transaction.
lock_rec_queue_validate(): Recheck impl_trx->state while holding
impl_trx->mutex.
row_vers_impl_x_locked(), row_vers_impl_x_locked_low():
Document that the transaction state must be rechecked after
trx_mutex_enter().
trx_free_prepared(): Adjust for the changes to lock_trx_release_locks().
Problem:
========
We have a Master/Master Setup on two servers, but are only writing to one of
those servers (so it is essentially Master/Slave) We upgraded from 10.1.* to
10.2.22 last week and starting with the upgrade, we are getting duplicate key
errors on the slave. BINLOG=mixed.
Analysis:
=========
This issue happens with LOCK TABLES and binlog_format=MIXED combination. When an
UNSAFE statement is encountered in 'MIXED' mode, it is logged in the form of
'ROW' format. For all the tables that are part of LOCK TABLES list their table maps
are written into the binary log. For each table in the list a check is
done to see if 'check_table_binlog_row_based_done' flag is set or not. If it is not set
a check process is initiated to see if table qualifies for row based binary
logging or not and 'check_table_binlog_row_based_done' is set. This flag will be
cleared at the time of closing thread tables.
But there can be special cases where the LOCK TABLES contains more number of
tables but the unsafe query is actually using subset of tables from LOCK TABLES
list.
For example: LOCK TABLES locks t1,t2,t3 but the unsafe statement makes use of
only two tables t1,t3. In this case the 'check_table_binlog_row_based_done' flag
is enabled for table 't2' while writing table map, but 'close_thread_tables'
function call will not reset this flag. Since the flag is not cleared for table
't2' even a safe statement which used t2 will be logged in the form of row based
format.
This leads to an assert on debug builds and causes duplicate entries in release
builds. In release builds a statement is logged in the form of both ROW and
STATEMENT format. This causes the slave to fail with duplicate key error.
Fix:
===
During 'close_thread_tables' when LOCK TABLE modes are active "ha_reset" is done
for all the tables which were part of current statement. As mentioned in the
example 'ha_reset' is called for tables 't1' and 't3'. This will clear the
'check_table_binlog_row_based_done' flag. At this point add a check for the rest
of the tables to see if 'check_table_binlog_row_based_done' is enabled or not.
If enabled clear the flag.
