Commit graph

595 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Oleksandr Byelkin
04d9a46c41 Merge branch '10.6' into 10.10 2023-11-08 16:23:30 +01:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
b83c379420 Merge branch '10.5' into 10.6 2023-11-08 15:57:05 +01:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
6cfd2ba397 Merge branch '10.4' into 10.5 2023-11-08 12:59:00 +01:00
Sergei Petrunia
c886689261 MDEV-32320: Server crashes at TABLE::add_tmp_key
The code inside Item_subselect::fix_fields() could fail to check
that left expression had an Item_row, like this:

  (('x', 1.0) ,1) IN (SELECT 'x', 1.23 FROM ... UNION ...)

In order to hit the failure, the first SELECT of the subquery had
to be a degenerate no-tables select. In this case, execution will
not enter into Item_in_subselect::create_row_in_to_exists_cond()
and will not check if left_expr is composed of scalars.

But the subquery is a UNION so as a whole it is not degenerate.
We try to create an expression cache for the subquery.
We create a temp.table from left_expr columns. No field is created
for the Item_row. Then, we crash when trying to add an index over a
non-existent field.

Fixed by moving the left_expr cardinality check to a point in
check_and_do_in_subquery_rewrites() which gets executed for all
cases.
It's better to make the check early so we don't have to care about
subquery rewrite code hitting Item_row in left_expr.
2023-10-15 18:11:15 +03:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
ced243a099 Merge branch '10.9' into 10.10 2023-08-05 20:34:09 +02:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
34a8e78581 Merge branch '10.6' into 10.9 2023-08-04 08:01:06 +02:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
6bf8483cac Merge branch '10.5' into 10.6 2023-08-01 15:08:52 +02:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
f52954ef42 Merge commit '10.4' into 10.5 2023-07-20 11:54:52 +02:00
Igor Babaev
a09f661f43 MDEV-31181 Crash with EXPLAIN EXTENDED for single-table DELETE using IN predicand
This bug affected EXPLAIN EXTENDED command for single-table DELETE that
used an IN subquery in its WHERE clause. A crash happened if the optimizer
chose to employ index_subquery or unique_subquery access when processing
such command.
The crash happened when the command tried to print the transformed query.
In the current code of 10.4 for single-table DELETE statements the output
of any explain command is produced after the join structures of all used
subqueries have been destroyed. JOIN::destroy() sets the field tab of the
JOIN_TAB structures created for subquery tables to NULL. As a result
subselect_indexsubquery_engine::print(), subselect_indexsubquery_engine()
cannot use this field to get the alias name of the joined table.

This patch suggests to use the field TABLE_LIST::TAB that can be accessed
from JOIN_TAB::tab_list to get the alias name of the joined table.

Approved by Oleksandr Byelkin <sanja@mariadb.com>
2023-05-08 11:42:24 -07:00
Marko Mäkelä
4ccb2be65f Merge 10.9 into 10.10 2023-03-06 13:38:39 +02:00
Marko Mäkelä
669a0c6efb Merge 10.6 into 10.8 2023-03-06 13:37:12 +02:00
Marko Mäkelä
085d0ac238 Merge 10.5 into 10.6 2023-02-28 16:05:21 +02:00
Monty
57c526ffb8 Added detection of memory overwrite with multi_malloc
This patch also fixes some bugs detected by valgrind after this
patch:

- Not enough copy_func elements was allocated by Create_tmp_table() which
  causes an memory overwrite in Create_tmp_table::add_fields()
  I added an ASSERT() to be able to detect this also without valgrind.
  The bug was that TMP_TABLE_PARAM::copy_fields was not correctly set
  when calling create_tmp_table().
- Aria::empty_bits is not allocated if there is no varchar/char/blob
  fields in the table.  Fixed code to take this into account.
  This cannot cause any issues as this is just a memory access
  into other Aria memory and the content of the memory would not be used.
- Aria::last_key_buff was not allocated big enough. This may have caused
  issues with rtrees and ma_extra(HA_EXTRA_REMEMBER_POS) as they
  would use the same memory area.
- Aria and MyISAM didn't take extended key parts into account, which
  caused problems when copying rec_per_key from engine to sql level.
- Mark asan builds with 'asan' in version strihng to detect these in
  not_valgrind_build.inc.
  This is needed to not have main.sp-no-valgrind fail with asan.
2023-02-27 19:25:44 +02:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
45087dd0b3 Merge branch '10.9' into 10.10 2023-01-18 16:45:59 +01:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
26d8485244 Merge branch '10.7' into 10.8 2023-01-18 16:37:40 +01:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
795ff0daf0 Merge branch '10.6' into 10.7 2023-01-18 16:36:13 +01:00
Marko Mäkelä
a8c5635cf1 Merge 10.5 into 10.6 2023-01-17 20:02:29 +02:00
Monty
981a6b7044 MDEV-30395 Wrong result with semijoin and Federated as outer table
The problem was that federated engine does not support comparable rowids
which was not taken into account by semijoin code.

Fixed by checking that we don't use semijoin with tables that does not
support comparable rowids.

Other things:
- Fixed some typos in the code comments
2023-01-13 16:23:21 +02:00
Marko Mäkelä
4ce6e78059 Merge 10.9 into 10.10 2022-07-28 11:25:21 +03:00
Marko Mäkelä
f79cebb4d0 Merge 10.7 into 10.8 2022-07-28 10:33:26 +03:00
Marko Mäkelä
742e1c727f Merge 10.6 into 10.7 2022-07-27 18:26:21 +03:00
Marko Mäkelä
30914389fe Merge 10.5 into 10.6 2022-07-27 17:52:37 +03:00
Marko Mäkelä
098c0f2634 Merge 10.4 into 10.5 2022-07-27 17:17:24 +03:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
3bb36e9495 Merge branch '10.3' into 10.4 2022-07-27 11:02:57 +02:00
Monty
1f0187ff8d Reduced size of POSITION
Replaced Cost_estimate prefix_cost with a double as prefix_cost was
only used to store and retrive total prefix cost.

This also speeds up things (a bit) as don't have to call
Cost_estimate::total_cost() for every access to the prefix_cost.

Sizeof POSITION decreased from 304 to 256.
2022-07-26 22:27:29 +07:00
Sergei Petrunia
0e9a255ec8 MDEV-28871: Assert ... failed in JOIN::dbug_verify_sj_inner_tables...
optimize_semi_joins() calls update_sj_state() to update semi-join
optimization state in the JOIN class.

greedy_search() algorithm considers different join prefixes,
and then picks one table to put into the join prefix.
Most of the semi-join optimization state is in the table's entry
in the join->positions[cur_prefix_size].

However, it also needs to call update_sj_state() to update the
semi-join optimization state in the JOIN class.

There is one exception, which is the cause of this bug: when we're
inside optimize_semi_join_nests() and are optimizing a subquery,
optimize_semi_joins() does nothing, it doesn't call update_sj_state().

greedy_search() must not do that either.
2022-07-07 22:15:42 +03:00
Marko Mäkelä
0af9346079 Merge 10.7 into 10.8 2022-06-09 14:37:53 +03:00
Marko Mäkelä
fe75e5e5b1 Merge 10.6 into 10.7 2022-06-09 14:11:43 +03:00
Marko Mäkelä
a9d0bb12e6 Merge 10.4 into 10.5 2022-06-09 12:22:55 +03:00
Marko Mäkelä
c89e3b70a7 Merge 10.3 into 10.4 2022-06-09 11:53:46 +03:00
Sergei Petrunia
f0ea7f7f33 MDEV-28749: restore_prev_nj_state() doesn't update cur_sj_inner_tables correctly
(Try 2)

The code that updates semi-join optimization state for a join order prefix
had several bugs. The visible effect was bad optimization for FirstMatch or
LooseScan strategies: they either weren't considered when they should have
been, or considered when they shouldn't have been.

In order to hit the bug, the optimizer needs to consider several different
join prefixes in a certain order. Queries with "obvious" query plans which
prune all join orders except one are not affected.

Internally, the bugs in updates of semi-join state were:
1. restore_prev_sj_state() assumed that
  "we assume remaining_tables doesnt contain @tab"
  which wasn't true.
2. Another bug in this function: it did remove bits from
   join->cur_sj_inner_tables but never added them.
3. greedy_search() adds tables into the join prefix but neglects to update
   the semi-join optimization state. (It does update nested outer join
   state, see this call:
     check_interleaving_with_nj(best_table)
   but there's no matching call to update the semi-join state.
   (This wasn't visible because most of the state is in the POSITION
    structure which is updated. But there is also state in JOIN, too)

The patch:
- Fixes all of the above
- Adds JOIN::dbug_verify_sj_inner_tables() which is used to verify the
  state is correct at every step.
- Renames advance_sj_state() to optimize_semi_joins().
  = Introduces update_sj_state() which ideally should have been called
    "advance_sj_state" but I didn't reuse the name to not create confusion.
2022-06-07 20:43:10 +03:00
Sergei Petrunia
19c721631e MDEV-28749: restore_prev_nj_state() doesn't update cur_sj_inner_tables correctly
(Try 2) (Cherry-pick back into 10.3)

The code that updates semi-join optimization state for a join order prefix
had several bugs. The visible effect was bad optimization for FirstMatch or
LooseScan strategies: they either weren't considered when they should have
been, or considered when they shouldn't have been.

In order to hit the bug, the optimizer needs to consider several different
join prefixes in a certain order. Queries with "obvious" query plans which
prune all join orders except one are not affected.

Internally, the bugs in updates of semi-join state were:
1. restore_prev_sj_state() assumed that
  "we assume remaining_tables doesnt contain @tab"
  which wasn't true.
2. Another bug in this function: it did remove bits from
   join->cur_sj_inner_tables but never added them.
3. greedy_search() adds tables into the join prefix but neglects to update
   the semi-join optimization state. (It does update nested outer join
   state, see this call:
     check_interleaving_with_nj(best_table)
   but there's no matching call to update the semi-join state.
   (This wasn't visible because most of the state is in the POSITION
    structure which is updated. But there is also state in JOIN, too)

The patch:
- Fixes all of the above
- Adds JOIN::dbug_verify_sj_inner_tables() which is used to verify the
  state is correct at every step.
- Renames advance_sj_state() to optimize_semi_joins().
  = Introduces update_sj_state() which ideally should have been called
    "advance_sj_state" but I didn't reuse the name to not create confusion.
2022-06-07 18:48:44 +03:00
Sergei Petrunia
bd946a4059 Code cleanup: don't call subquery_types_allow_materialization() on prepare
For subqueries that are processed as semi-joins.
2022-02-25 10:23:48 +03:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
9ed8deb656 Merge branch '10.6' into 10.7 2022-02-04 14:11:46 +01:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
f5c5f8e41e Merge branch '10.5' into 10.6 2022-02-03 17:01:31 +01:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
cf63eecef4 Merge branch '10.4' into 10.5 2022-02-01 20:33:04 +01:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
a576a1cea5 Merge branch '10.3' into 10.4 2022-01-30 09:46:52 +01:00
Alexey Botchkov
020dc54dab MDEV-20770 Server crashes in JOIN::transform_in_predicates_into_in_subq upon 2nd execution of PS/SP comparing GEOMETRY with other types.
The Item_in_subselect::in_strategy keeps the value and as the error
happens the condition isn't modified. That leads to wrong ::fix_fields
execution on second PS run. Also the select->table_list is merged
but not restored if an error happens, which causes hanging loops on
the third PS execution.
2022-01-26 07:48:09 +04:00
Marko Mäkelä
d2a7710635 Merge 10.4 into 10.5 2021-12-03 10:27:35 +02:00
Marko Mäkelä
1e54a9716d Merge 10.6 into 10.7 2021-12-02 17:22:06 +02:00
Sergei Petrunia
5f22e83a29 Make the Optimizer Trace of reqular query and PS EXECUTE be identical
Print this piece when we've just made the choice to convert to semi-join.
Also, print it when we've already made that choice before:

  transformation": {
     "select_id": 2,
     "from": "IN (SELECT)",
     "to": "semijoin",
     "chosen": true
   }
2021-11-29 16:25:27 +03:00
Sergei Petrunia
cca4e14f9b Make the Optimizer Trace of reqular query and PS EXECUTE be identical
Print this piece when we've just made the choice to convert to semi-join.
Also, print it when we've already made that choice before:

  transformation": {
     "select_id": 2,
     "from": "IN (SELECT)",
     "to": "semijoin",
     "chosen": true
   }
2021-11-29 16:19:10 +03:00
Marko Mäkelä
7e8a13d9d7 Merge 10.6 into 10.7 2021-11-19 17:45:52 +02:00
Marko Mäkelä
dc8def73f7 Merge 10.5 into 10.6 2021-11-16 16:30:45 +02:00
Marko Mäkelä
09205a1c9a Merge 10.4 into 10.5 2021-11-16 14:26:13 +02:00
Sergei Krivonos
1f1ee085fb MDEV-23766: Fix fix_semijoin_strategies_for_picked_join_order by assert 2021-11-09 12:06:49 +02:00
Sergei Golubchik
0299ec29d4 cleanup: MY_BITMAP mutex
in about a hundred of users of MY_BITMAP, only two were using its
built-in mutex, and only one of those two was actually needing it.

Remove the mutex from MY_BITMAP, remove all associated conditions
and checks in bitmap functions. Use an external LOCK_temp_pool
mutex and temp_pool_set_next/temp_pool_clear_bit acccessors.

Remove bitmap_init/bitmap_free, always use my_* versions.
2021-08-26 23:39:52 +02:00
Monty
6079b46d8d Split item->flags into base_flags and with_flags
This was done to simplify copying of with_* flags

Other things:
- Changed Flags to C++ enums, which enables gdb to print
  out bit values for the flags. This also enables compiler
  errors if one tries to manipulate a non existing bit in
  a variable.
- Added set_maybe_null() as a shortcut as setting the
  MAYBE_NULL flags was used in a LOT of places.
- Renamed PARAM flag to SP_VAR to ensure it's not confused with persistent
  statement parameters.
2021-05-19 22:27:28 +02:00
Monty
7ca4e381f7 Removed Item::is_fixed() and Item::has_subquery()
One should instead use Item::fixed() and Item::with_subquery()

Removed Item::is_fixed() and has_subquery() and did the following replace:
replace is_fixed() fixed() -- *.*
replace 'has_subquery()' 'with_subquery()' -- *.*
2021-05-19 22:27:28 +02:00
Michael Widenius
3105c9e7a5 Change bitfields in Item to an uint16
The reason for the change is that neither clang or gcc can do efficient
code when several bit fields are change at the same time or when copying
one or more bits between identical bit fields.
Updated bits explicitely with & and | is MUCH more efficient than what
current compilers can do.
2021-05-19 22:27:28 +02:00