Dropping an user defined function may cause server crash in
case this function is still in use by another thread.
The problem was that our hash implementation didn't update
hash link list properly when hash_update() was called.
This bug may manifest itself for select queries over a multi-table view
that includes an ORDER BY clause in its definition. If the select list of
the query contains references to the same view column with different
aliases the names of the columns in the result output will be nevertheless
the same, coinciding with one of the alias.
The bug happened because the method Item_ref::get_tmp_table_item that
was inherited by the class Item_direct_view_ref ignored the fact that
the name of the view column reference must be inherited by the fields
of the temporary table that was created in order to get the result rows
sorted.
'No database selected' is reported when calling stored procedures
Remove the offending warning introduced by the fix for Bug
25082
This minimal patch relies on the intrinsic knowledge of the fact that
mysql_change_db is never called with 'force_switch' set to TRUE
when such a warning may be needed:
* every stored routine belongs to a database (unlike, e.g., a
user defined function, which does not), so if we're activating the
database of a stored routine, it can never be NULL.
Therefore, this branch is never called for activation.
* if we're restoring the 'old' current database after routine
execution is complete, we should not issue a warning, since it's OK to
call a routine without having previously selected the current database.
TODO: 'force_switch' is an ambiguous flag, since we do not actually
have to 'force' the switch in case of stored routines at all.
When we activate the routine's database, we should perform
all the checks as in case of 'use db', and so we already do (in this
case 'force_switch' is unused).
When we load a routine into cache, we should not use mysql_change_db
at all, since there it's enough to call thd->reset_db(). We
do it this way for triggers, but code for routines is different (wrongly).
TODO: bugs are lurking in replication, since it bypasses mysql_change_db
and calls thd->[re_]set_db to set the current database.
The latter does not change thd->db_charset, thd->sctx->db_access
and thd->variables.collation_database (and this may have nasty side
effects).
These todo items are to be addressed in a separate patch, if at all.
The `SELECT 'r' INTO OUTFILE ... FIELDS ENCLOSED BY 'r' ' statement
encoded the 'r' string to a 4 byte string of value x'725c7272'
(sequence of 4 characters: r\rr).
The LOAD DATA statement decoded this string to a 1 byte string of
value x'0d' (ASCII Carriage Return character) instead of the original
'r' character.
The same error also happened with the FIELDS ENCLOSED BY clause
followed by special characters: 'n', 't', 'r', 'b', '0', 'Z' and 'N'.
NOTE 1: This is a result of the undocumented feature: the LOAD DATA INFILE
recognises 2-byte input sequences like \n, \t, \r and \Z in addition
to documented 2-byte sequences: \0 and \N. This feature should be
documented (here backspace character is a default ESCAPED BY character,
in the real-life example it may be any ESCAPED BY character).
NOTE 2, changed behaviour:
Now the `SELECT INTO OUTFILE' statement with the `FIELDS ENCLOSED BY'
clause followed by one of: 'n', 't', 'r', 'b', '0', 'Z' or 'N' characters
encodes this special character itself by doubling it ('r' --> 'rr'),
not by prepending it with an escape character.
This bug may manifest itself not only with the queries for which
the index-merge access method is chosen. It also may display
itself for queries with DISTINCT.
The bug was in how the Unique::get method used the merge_buffers
function. To compare elements in the the queue employed by
merge_buffers() it must use the buffpek_compare function rather
than the function for binary comparison.
When a UNION statement forced conversion of an UTF8
charset value to a binary charset value, the byte
length of the result values was truncated to the
CHAR_LENGTH of the original UTF8 value.
spaces.
When the my_strnncollsp_simple function compares two strings and one is a prefix
of another then this function compares characters in the rest of longer key
with the space character to find whether the longer key is greater or less.
But the sort order of the collation isn't used in this comparison. This may
lead to a wrong comparison result, wrongly created index or wrong order of the
result set of a query with the ORDER BY clause.
Now the my_strnncollsp_simple function uses collation sort order to compare
the characters in the rest of longer key with the space character.
