'LOAD DATA CONCURRENT [LOCAL] INFILE ...' statment only is binlogged as
'LOAD DATA [LOCAL] INFILE ...' in SBR and MBR. As a result, if replication is on,
queries on slaves will be blocked by the replication SQL thread.
This patch write code to write 'CONCURRENT' into the log event if 'CONCURRENT' option
is in the original statement in SBR and MBR.
Problem: Some system functions that could return different values on
master and slave were not marked unsafe. In particular:
GET_LOCK
IS_FREE_LOCK
IS_USED_LOCK
MASTER_POS_WAIT
RELEASE_LOCK
SLEEP
SYSDATE
VERSION
Fix: Mark these functions unsafe.
One statement that have more than one different tables to update with
autoinc columns just was marked as unsafe in mixed mode, so the unsafe
warning can't be produced in statement mode.
To fix the problem, mark the statement as unsafe in statement mode too.
For application compatibility reasons MySQL converts "<autoincrement_column> IS NULL"
predicates to "<autoincrement_column> = LAST_INSERT_ID()" in the first SELECT following an
INSERT regardless of whether they're top level predicates or not. This causes wrong and
obscure results when these predicates are combined with others on the same columns. Fixed
by only doing the transformation on a single top-level predicate if a special SQL mode is
turned on (sql_auto_is_null).
Also made sql_auto_is_null off by default.
per-file comments:
mysql-test/r/func_isnull.result
Bug#41371 Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
test result updated
mysql-test/t/func_isnull.test
Bug#41371 Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
test case added
sql/mysqld.cc
Bug#41371 Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
sql_auto_is_null now is OFF by default.
sql/sql_select.cc
Bug#41371 Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
remove_eq_conds() split in two parts - one only checks the upper condition,
the req_remove_eq_conds() recursively checks all the condition tree.
mysql-test/extra/rpl_tests/rpl_insert_id.test
Bug#41371 Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
test fixed (set the sql_auto_is_null variable)
mysql-test/r/mysqlbinlog.result
Bug#41371 Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
result updated
mysql-test/r/mysqlbinlog2.result
Bug#41371 Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
result updated
mysql-test/r/odbc.result
Bug#41371 Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
result updated
mysql-test/r/query_cache.result
Bug#41371 Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
result updated
mysql-test/r/user_var-binlog.result
Bug#41371 Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
result updated
mysql-test/suite/binlog/r/binlog_row_ctype_ucs.result
Bug#41371 Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
result updated
mysql-test/suite/binlog/r/binlog_stm_ctype_ucs.result
Bug#41371 Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
result updated
mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_insert_id.result
Bug#41371 Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
result updated
mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_row_mysqlbinlog.result
Bug#41371 Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
result updated
mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_sp.result
Bug#41371 Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
result updated
mysql-test/t/odbc.test
Bug#41371 Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
test fixed (set the sql_auto_is_null variable)
binlog, replication aborts
In SBR or MBR, the schema name is not being written to the binlog
when executing a LOAD DATA statement. This becomes a problem when
the current database (lets call it db1) is different from the
table's schema (lets call it db2). For instance, take the
following statements:
use db1;
load data local infile 'infile.txt' into table db2.t
Should this statement be logged without t's schema (db2), when
replaying it, one can get db1.t populated instead of db2.t (if
db1.t exists). On the other hand, if there is no db1.t at all,
replication will stop.
We fix this by always logging the table (in load file) with fully
qualified name when its schema is different from the current
database or when no default database was selected.
Conflicts
=========
Text conflict in .bzr-mysql/default.conf
Text conflict in libmysqld/CMakeLists.txt
Text conflict in libmysqld/Makefile.am
Text conflict in mysql-test/collections/default.experimental
Text conflict in mysql-test/extra/rpl_tests/rpl_row_sp006.test
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/binlog/r/binlog_tmp_table.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_loaddata.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_loaddata_fatal.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_row_create_table.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_row_sp006_InnoDB.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_stm_log.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl_ndb/r/rpl_ndb_circular_simplex.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl_ndb/r/rpl_ndb_sp006.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/t/mysqlbinlog.test
Text conflict in sql/CMakeLists.txt
Text conflict in sql/Makefile.am
Text conflict in sql/log_event_old.cc
Text conflict in sql/rpl_rli.cc
Text conflict in sql/slave.cc
Text conflict in sql/sql_binlog.cc
Text conflict in sql/sql_lex.h
21 conflicts encountered.
NOTE
====
mysql-5.1-rpl-merge has been made a mirror of mysql-next-mr:
- "mysql-5.1-rpl-merge$ bzr pull ../mysql-next-mr"
This is the first cset (merge/...) committed after pulling
from mysql-next-mr.
Backporting BUG#43789 to mysql-5.1-bugteam
The replication was generating corrupted data, warning messages on Valgrind
and aborting on debug mode while replicating a "null" to "not null" field.
Specifically the unpack_row routine, was considering the slave's table
definition and trying to retrieve a field value, where there was nothing to be
retrieved, ignoring the fact that the value was defined as "null" by the master.
To fix the problem, we proceed as follows:
1 - If it is not STRICT sql_mode, implicit default values are used, regardless
if it is multi-row or single-row statement.
2 - However, if it is STRICT mode, then a we do what follows:
2.1 If it is a transactional engine, we do a rollback on the first NULL that is
to be set into a NOT NULL column and return an error.
2.2 If it is a non-transactional engine and it is the first row to be inserted
with multi-row, we also return the error. Otherwise, we proceed with the
execution, use implicit default values and print out warning messages.
Unfortunately, the current patch cannot mimic the behavior showed by the master
for updates on multi-tables and multi-row inserts. This happens because such
statements are unfolded in different row events. For instance, considering the
following updates and strict mode:
(master)
create table t1 (a int);
create table t2 (a int not null);
insert into t1 values (1);
insert into t2 values (2);
update t1, t2 SET t1.a=10, t2.a=NULL;
t1 would have (10) and t2 would have (0) as this would be handled as a
multi-row update. On the other hand, if we had the following updates:
(master)
create table t1 (a int);
create table t2 (a int);
(slave)
create table t1 (a int);
create table t2 (a int not null);
(master)
insert into t1 values (1);
insert into t2 values (2);
update t1, t2 SET t1.a=10, t2.a=NULL;
On the master t1 would have (10) and t2 would have (NULL). On
the slave, t1 would have (10) but the update on t1 would fail.
Backporting BUG#38173 to mysql-5.1-bugteam
The reason of the bug was incompatibile with the master side behaviour.
INSERT query on the master is allowed to insert into a table without specifying
values of DEFAULT-less fields if sql_mode is not strict.
Fixed with checking sql_mode by the sql thread to decide how to react.
Non-strict sql_mode should allow Write_rows event to complete.
todo: warnings can be shown via show slave status, still this is a
separate rather general issue how to show warnings for the slave threads.
The BINLOG statement was sharing too much code with the slave SQL thread, introduced with
the patch for Bug#32407. This caused statements to be logged with the wrong server_id, the
id stored inside the events of the BINLOG statement rather than the id of the running
server.
Fix by rearranging code a bit so that only relevant parts of the code are executed by
the BINLOG statement, and the server_id of the server executing the statements will
not be overrided by the server_id stored in the 'format description BINLOG statement'.
Let
- T be a transactional table and N non-transactional table.
- B be begin, C commit and R rollback.
- N be a statement that accesses and changes only N-tables.
- T be a statement that accesses and changes only T-tables.
In RBR, changes to N-tables that happen early in a transaction are not immediately flushed
upon committing a statement. This behavior may, however, break consistency in the presence
of concurrency since changes done to N-tables become immediately visible to other
connections. To fix this problem, we do the following:
. B N N T C would log - B N C B N C B T C.
. B N N T R would log - B N C B N C B T R.
Note that we are not preserving history from the master as we are introducing a commit that
never happened. However, this seems to be more acceptable than the possibility of breaking
consistency in the presence of concurrency.
Let
- T be a transactional table and N non-transactional table.
- B be begin, C commit and R rollback.
- M be a mixed statement, i.e. a statement that updates both T and N.
- M* be a mixed statement that fails while updating either T or N.
This patch restore the behavior presented in 5.1.37 for rows either produced in
the RBR or MIXED modes, when a M* statement that happened early in a transaction
had their changes written to the binary log outside the boundaries of the
transaction and wrapped in a BEGIN/ROLLBACK. This was done to keep the slave
consistent with with the master as the rollback would keep the changes on N and
undo them on T. In particular, we do what follows:
. B M* T C would log - B M* R B T C.
Note that, we are not preserving history from the master as we are introducing a
rollback that never happened. However, this seems to be more acceptable than
making the slave diverge. We do not fix the following case:
. B T M* C would log B T M* C.
The slave will diverge as the changes on T tables that originated from the M
statement are rolled back on the master but not on the slave. Unfortunately, we
cannot simply rollback the transaction as this would undo any uncommitted
changes on T tables.
SBR is not considered in this patch because a failing statement is written to
the binary along with the error code and a slave executes and then rolls back
the statement when it has an associated error code, thus undoing the effects
on T. In RBR and MBR, a full-fledged fix will be pushed after the WL 2687.
The problem is that there is only one autoinc value associated with
the query when binlogging. If more than one autoinc values are used
in the query, the autoinc values after the first one can be inserted
wrongly on slave. So these autoinc values can become inconsistent on
master and slave.
The problem is resolved by marking all the statements that invoke
a trigger or call a function that updated autoinc fields as unsafe,
and will switch to row-format in Mixed mode. Actually, the statement
is safe if just one autoinc value is used in sub-statement, but it's
impossible to check how many autoinc values are used in sub-statement.)
vs not null
NOTE: Backporting the patch to next-mr.
The replication was generating corrupted data, warning messages on Valgrind
and aborting on debug mode while replicating a "null" to "not null" field.
Specifically the unpack_row routine, was considering the slave's table
definition and trying to retrieve a field value, where there was nothing to be
retrieved, ignoring the fact that the value was defined as "null" by the master.
To fix the problem, we proceed as follows:
1 - If it is not STRICT sql_mode, implicit default values are used, regardless
if it is multi-row or single-row statement.
2 - However, if it is STRICT mode, then a we do what follows:
2.1 If it is a transactional engine, we do a rollback on the first NULL that is
to be set into a NOT NULL column and return an error.
2.2 If it is a non-transactional engine and it is the first row to be inserted
with multi-row, we also return the error. Otherwise, we proceed with the
execution, use implicit default values and print out warning messages.
Unfortunately, the current patch cannot mimic the behavior showed by the master
for updates on multi-tables and multi-row inserts. This happens because such
statements are unfolded in different row events. For instance, considering the
following updates and strict mode:
(master)
create table t1 (a int);
create table t2 (a int not null);
insert into t1 values (1);
insert into t2 values (2);
update t1, t2 SET t1.a=10, t2.a=NULL;
t1 would have (10) and t2 would have (0) as this would be handled as a
multi-row update. On the other hand, if we had the following updates:
(master)
create table t1 (a int);
create table t2 (a int);
(slave)
create table t1 (a int);
create table t2 (a int not null);
(master)
insert into t1 values (1);
insert into t2 values (2);
update t1, t2 SET t1.a=10, t2.a=NULL;
On the master t1 would have (10) and t2 would have (NULL). On
the slave, t1 would have (10) but the update on t1 would fail.
NOTE: Backporting the patch to next-mr.
The reason of the bug was incompatibile with the master side behaviour.
INSERT query on the master is allowed to insert into a table without specifying
values of DEFAULT-less fields if sql_mode is not strict.
Fixed with checking sql_mode by the sql thread to decide how to react.
Non-strict sql_mode should allow Write_rows event to complete.
todo: warnings can be shown via show slave status, still this is a
separate rather general issue how to show warnings for the slave threads.
files
NOTE: this is the backport to next-mr.
SHOW BINLOG EVENTS does not work with relay log files. If issuing
"SHOW BINLOG EVENTS IN 'relay-log.000001'" in a non-empty relay
log file (relay-log.000001), mysql reports empty set.
This patch addresses this issue by extending the SHOW command
with RELAYLOG. Events in relay log files can now be inspected by
issuing SHOW RELAYLOG EVENTS [IN 'log_name'] [FROM pos] [LIMIT
[offset,] row_count].
In RBR, 'DROP TEMPORARY TABLE IF EXISTS...' statement is binlogged when the table
does not exist.
In fact, 'DROP TEMPORARY TABLE ...' statement should never be binlogged in RBR
no matter if the table exists or not.
This patch addresses this by checking whether we are dropping a
temporary table or not, when building the custom drop statement.
failure to cleanup of table
The test case was not dropping a table before exiting (ie, it was
not cleaning itself after execution). In this case, the warning
message stating that the test did not do a proper cleanup was
deterministic (which can be annoying).
I have found other tests cases on which mtr sporadically reports
that they have not cleaned up after execution:
- rpl_ndb_circular
- rpl_failed_optimize
In this case, the master was dropping a table but there was no
synchronization between the slave and the master.
This patch addresses the rpl_ndb_circular_simplex case by adding
the missing DROP table. The other cases are fixed by deploying
the missing sync_slave_with_master instruction.
Network error happened here, but it can be caused by CR_CONNECTION_ERROR,
CR_CONN_HOST_ERROR, CR_SERVER_GONE_ERROR, CR_SERVER_LOST, ER_CON_COUNT_ERROR,
and ER_SERVER_SHUTDOWN. We just check CR_SERVER_LOST here, so the test fails.
To fix the problem, check all errors that can be cause by the master shutdown.
When setting AUTOCOMMIT=1 after starting a transaction, the binary log
did not commit the outstanding transaction. The reason was that the binary
log commit function saw the values of the new settings, deciding that there
were nothing to commit.
Fixed the problem by moving the implicit commit to before the thread option
flags were changed, so that the binary log sees the old values of the flags
instead of the values they will take after the statement.
In RBR, There is an inconsistency between slaves and master.
When INSERT statement which includes an auto_increment field is executed,
Store engine of master will check the value of the auto_increment field.
It will generate a sequence number and then replace the value, if its value is NULL or empty.
if the field's value is 0, the store engine will do like encountering the NULL values
unless NO_AUTO_VALUE_ON_ZERO is set into SQL_MODE.
In contrast, if the field's value is 0, Store engine of slave always generates a new sequence number
whether or not NO_AUTO_VALUE_ON_ZERO is set into SQL_MODE.
SQL MODE of slave sql thread is always consistency with master's.
Another variable is related to this bug.
If generateing a sequence number is decided by the values of
table->auto_increment_field_not_null and SQL_MODE(if includes MODE_NO_AUTO_VALUE_ON_ZERO)
The table->auto_increment_is_not_null is FALSE, which causes this bug to appear. ..
Essentially, Bug#45574 results in this bug. The 'CREATE DATABASE IF NOT EXISTS' statement was not
binlogged, when the database has existed.
Sometimes, the master and slaves become inconsistent. The "CREATE DATABASE
IF NOT EXISTS mysqltest1" statement is not binlogged
if the db 'mysqltest1' existed before the test case is executed.
So the db 'mysqltest1' can't be created on slave.
Patch of Bug#45574 has resolved this problem.
But I think it is better to replace 'mysqltest1' by default db 'test'.
