Commit graph

28973 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Alexander Barkov
5aec4e2b3b Backporting Bug 14100466 from 5.6. 2012-08-17 13:14:04 +04:00
Mattias Jonsson
404cce0ff8 manual merge 5.1->5.5 2012-08-15 14:56:55 +02:00
Mattias Jonsson
bcee9f1896 Bug#13025132 - PARTITIONS USE TOO MUCH MEMORY
The buffer for the current read row from each partition
(m_ordered_rec_buffer) used for sorted reads was
allocated on open and freed when the ha_partition handler
was closed or destroyed.

For tables with many partitions and big records this could
take up too much valuable memory.

Solution is to only allocate the memory when it is needed
and free it when nolonger needed. I.e. allocate it in
index_init and free it in index_end (and to handle failures
also free it on reset, close etc.)

Also only allocating needed memory, according to
partitioning pruning.

Manually tested that it does not use as much memory and
releases it after queries.
2012-08-15 14:31:26 +02:00
Sujatha Sivakumar
3af67068f1 merge from 5.1 to 5.5 2012-08-14 14:21:40 +05:30
Sujatha Sivakumar
03bfc41bb8 Bug#13596613:SHOW SLAVE STATUS GIVES WRONG OUTPUT WITH
MASTER-MASTER AND USING SET USE

Problem:
=======
In a master-master set-up, a master can show a wrong
'SHOW SLAVE STATUS' output.

Requirements:
- master-master
- log_slave_updates

This is caused when using SET user-variables and then using
it to perform writes. From then on the master that performed
the insert will have a SHOW SLAVE STATUS that is wrong and  
it will never get updated until a write happens on the other
master. On"Master A" the "exec_master_log_pos" is not
getting updated.

Analysis:
========
Slave receives a "User_var" event from the master and after
applying the event, when "log_slave_updates" option is
enabled the slave tries to write this applied event into
its own binary log. At the time of writing this event the
slave should use the "originating server-id". But in the
above case the sever always logs the  "user var events"
by using its global server-id. Due to this in a
"master-master" replication when the event comes back to the
originating server the "User_var_event" doesn't get skipped.
"User_var_events" are context based events and they always
follow with a query event which marks their end of group.
Due to the above mentioned problem with "User_var_event"
logging the "User_var_event" never gets skipped where as
its corresponding "query_event" gets skipped. Hence the
"User_var" event always waits for the next "query event"
and the "Exec_master_log_position" does not get updated
properly.

Fix:
===
`MYSQL_BIN_LOG::write' function is used to write events
into binary log. Within this function a new object for
"User_var_log_event" is created and this new object is used
to write the "User_var" event in the binlog. "User var"
event is inherited from "Log_event". This "Log_event" has
different overloaded constructors. When a "THD" object
is present "Log_event(thd,...)" constructor should be used
to initialise the objects and in the absence of a valid
"THD" object "Log_event()" minimal constructor should be
used. In the above mentioned problem always default minimal
constructor was used which is incorrect. This minimal
constructor is replaced with "Log_event(thd,...)".

sql/log_event.h:
  Replaced the default constructor with another constructor
  which takes "THD" object as an argument.
2012-08-14 14:11:01 +05:30
Sergey Glukhov
2f30b34095 Bug #14409015 MEMORY LEAK WHEN REFERENCING OUTER FIELD IN HAVING
When resolving outer fields, Item_field::fix_outer_fields()
creates new Item_refs for each execution of a prepared statement, so
these must be allocated in the runtime memroot. The memroot switching
before resolving JOIN::having causes these to be allocated in the
statement root, leaking memory for each PS execution.


sql/item_subselect.cc:
  addon, fix for 11829691, item could be created in
  runtime memroot, so we need to use real_item instead.
2012-08-09 15:34:52 +04:00
Mattias Jonsson
6592afd5c2 Bug#14342883: SELECT QUERY RETURNS NOT ALL
ROWS THAT ARE EXPECTED

For non range/list partitioned tables (i.e. HASH/KEY):

When prune_partitions finds a multi-range list
(or in this test '<>') for a field of the partition index,
even if it cannot make any use of the multi-range,
it will continue with the next field of the partition index
and use that for pruning (even if it the previous
field could not be used). This results in partitions is
pruned away, leaving partitions that only matches
the last field in the partition index, and will exclude
partitions which might match any previous fields.

Fixed by skipping rest of partitioning key fields/parts
if current key field/part could not be used.

Also notice it is the order of the fields in the CREATE TABLE
statement that triggers this bug, not the order of fields in
primary/unique key or PARTITION BY KEY ().
It must not be the last field in the partitioning expression that
is not equal (or have a non single point range).
I.e. the partitioning index is created with the same field order
as in the CREATE TABLE. And for the bug to appear
the last field must be a single point and some previous field
must be a multi-point range.
2012-08-09 12:51:37 +02:00
Sergey Glukhov
51672ec2d4 5.1 -> 5.5 merge 2012-08-09 15:50:29 +04:00
Sunanda Menon
f58a69674a Merge from mysql-5.1.65-release 2012-08-09 08:50:43 +02:00
Nirbhay Choubey
ffdc4bc8cd Merge of patch for Bug#13928675 from mysql-5.1. 2012-08-07 19:07:13 +05:30
Nirbhay Choubey
5ad8292c63 Bug#13928675 MYSQL CLIENT COPYRIGHT NOTICE MUST
SHOW 2012 INSTEAD OF 2011

* Added a new macro to hold the current year :
  COPYRIGHT_NOTICE_CURRENT_YEAR
* Modified ORACLE_WELCOME_COPYRIGHT_NOTICE macro
  to take the initial year as parameter and pick
  current year from the above mentioned macro.
2012-08-07 18:58:19 +05:30
Praveenkumar Hulakund
d0766534bd Bug#13058122 - DML, LOCK/UNLOCK TABLES AND SELECT LEAD TO
FOREVER MDL LOCK

Analysis:
----------
While granting MDL lock for the lock requests in wait queue,
first the lock is granted to the high priority lock types
and then to the low priority lock types.

MDL Priority Matrix,
  +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+
  | Locks       |    |   |   |   |    |     |
  | has Priority|    |   |   |   |    |     |
  | over --->   |  S | SR| SW| SU| SNW| SNRW|   
  +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+
  | X           |  + | + | + | + | +  | +   |
  +-------------|----|---|---|---|----|-----|
  | SNRW        |  - | + | + | - | -  | -   |
  +-------------|----|---|---|---|----|-----|
  | SNW         |  - | - | + | - | -  | -   |
  +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+

Here '+' means, Lock priority is higher.
     '-' means, Has same priority

In the scenario where,
   *. Lock wait queue has requests of type S/SR/SW/SU.
   *. And locks of high priority X/SNRW/SNW are requested 
      continuously.

In this case, while granting lock, always first high priority 
lock requests(X/SNRW/SNW) are considered. Low priority 
locks(S/SR/SW/SU) will not get chance and they will 
wait forever.

In the scenario for which this bug is reported, application
executed many LOCK TABLES ... WRITE statements concurrently.
These statements request SNRW lock. Also there were some
connections trying to execute DML statements requesting SR
lock. Since SNRW lock request has higher priority (and as
they were too many waiting SNRW requests) lock is always 
granted to it. So, lock request SR will wait forever, resulting
in DML starvation.

How is this handled in 5.1?
---------------------------
Even in 5.1 we have low priority lock starvation issue.
But, in 5.1 thread locking, system variable 
"max_write_lock_count" can be configured to grant
some pending read lock requests. After 
"max_write_lock_count" of write lock grants all the low
priority locks are granted.

Why this issue is seen in 5.5/trunk?
---------------------------------
In 5.5/trunk MDL locking, "max_write_lock_count" system 
variable exists but not used in MDL, only thread lock uses
it. So no effect of "max_write_lock_count" in MDL locking.
This means that starvation of metadata locks is possible 
even if max_write_lock_count is used.

Looks like, customer was using "max_write_lock_count" in
5.1 and when upgraded to 5.5, starvation is seen because
of not having effect of "max_write_lock_count" in MDL.

Fix:
----------
As a fix, support for max_write_lock_count is added to MDL.
To maintain write lock counter per MDL_lock object, new
member "m_hog_lock_count" is added in MDL_lock.

And following logic is added to increment the counter in 
function reschedule_waiters, 
(reschedule_waiters function is called while thread is
 releasing the lock)
    - After granting lock request from the wait queue.
    -  Check if there are any S/SR/SU/SW exists in the wait queue
      - If yes then increment the "m_hog_lock_count"

And following logic is added in the same function to
handle pending S/SU/SR/SW locks
    
    - Before granting locks 
    - Check if max_write_lock_count <= m_hog_lock_count
    - If Yes, then try to grant S/SR/SW/SU locks. 
      (Since all of these has same priority, all locks are
       granted together. But some lock grant may fail because
       of grant incompatibility)
    - Reset m_hog_lock_count if there no low priority lock
      requests in wait queue. 
    - return

Note:
--------------------------
In the lock priority matrix explained above,
though X has priority over the SNW and SNRW. X locks is
taken mostly for RENAME, TRUNCATE, CREATE ... operations.
So lock type X may not be requested in loop continuously 
in real world applications, as compared to other lock 
request types. So, lock request of type SNW and SNRW are 
not starved. So, we can grant all S/SR/SU/SW in one shot,
without considering SNW & SNRW lock request starvation.

ALTER table operations take SU lock first and then 
upgrade to SNW if required. All S, SR, SW, SU have same
lock priority. So while granting SU, request of types
SR, SW, S are also granted in one shot. So, lock request 
of type SU->SNW in loop will not make other low priority 
lock request to starve.

But, when there is request for lock of type SNRW, lock
requests of lower priority types are not granted. And if 
SNRW is requested in loop continuously then all 
S, SR, SW, SU are starved.

This patch addresses the latter scenario.
When we have S/SR/SW/SU in wait queue and if 
there are
    - Continuous SNRW lock requests
    - OR one or more X and Continuous SNRW lock requests.
    - OR one SNW and Continuous SNRW lock requests.
    - OR one SNW, one or more X and continuous SNRW lock 
      requests.
in wait queue then, S/SR/SW/SU lock request are starved.
2012-08-07 11:48:36 +05:30
Chaithra Gopalareddy
f79b8d6ffe Merge from 5.1 to 5.5 2012-08-06 10:40:03 +05:30
Chaithra Gopalareddy
c61abdadcf Bug #14099846: EXPORT_SET CRASHES DUE TO OVERALLOCATION OF MEMORY
Backport the fix from 5.6 to 5.1
Base bug number : 11765562

sql/item_strfunc.cc:
  In Item_func_export_set::val_str, verify that the size of the end
  result is within reasonable bounds.
2012-08-05 16:29:28 +05:30
Tor Didriksen
a81c2b5842 merge 5.1 => 5.5 2012-07-27 09:19:35 +02:00
Tor Didriksen
5f2f37cd41 Bug#14111180 HANDLE_FATAL_SIGNAL IN PTR_COMPARE_1 / QUEUE_INSERT
Space available for merging was calculated incorrectly.
2012-07-27 09:13:10 +02:00
Praveenkumar Hulakund
0c75ba44fe Merge from 5.1 to 5.5 2012-07-26 23:53:45 +05:30
Praveenkumar Hulakund
44cd81da86 BUG#13868860 - LIMIT '5' IS EXECUTED WITHOUT ERROR WHEN '5'
IS PLACE HOLDER AND USE SERVER-SIDE 

Analysis:
LIMIT always takes nonnegative integer constant values. 

http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.6/en/select.html

So parsing of value '5' for LIMIT in SELECT fails.

But, within prepared statement, LIMIT parameters can be
specified using '?' markers. Value for the parameter can
be supplied while executing the prepared statement.

Passing string values, float or double value for LIMIT
works well from CLI. Because, while setting the value
for the parameters from the variable list (added using
SET), if the value is for parameter LIMIT then its 
converted to integer value. 

But, when prepared statement is executed from the other
interfaces as J connectors, or C applications etc.
The value for the parameters are sent to the server
with execute command. Each item in log has value and
the data TYPE. So, While setting parameter value
from this log, value is set to all the parameters
with the same data type as passed.
But here logic to convert value to integer type
if its for LIMIT parameter is missing.
Because of this,string '5' is set to LIMIT.
And the same is logged into the binlog file too. 

Fix:
When executing prepared statement having parameter for
CLI it worked fine, as the value set for the parameter
is converted to integer. And this failed in other 
interfaces as J connector,C Applications etc as this 
conversion is missing.

So, as a fix added check while setting value for the
parameters. If the parameter is for LIMIT value then
its converted to integer value.
2012-07-26 23:44:43 +05:30
Tor Didriksen
35785ed8b0 merge 5.1 => 5.5 2012-07-26 15:06:43 +02:00
Tor Didriksen
d24a78d1ea Backport of Bug#14171740 65562: STRING::SHRINK SHOULD BE A NO-OP WHEN ALLOCED=0 2012-07-26 15:05:24 +02:00
Thayumanavar
fa0d2df5ff Bug#13699303 - THREAD POOL PLUGIN IGNORES TIMEOUT.
PROBLEM: 
mysql provides a feature where in a session which is 
idle for a period specified by the wait_timeout variable
(whose value is in seconds), the session is closed
This feature is not present when we use thread pool.
FIX:
This patch implements the interface functions which is 
required to implement the wait_timeout functionality
in the thread pool plugin.
2012-07-25 16:24:18 +05:30
Sujatha Sivakumar
03993d03a7 Bug#13961678:MULTI-STATEMENT TRANSACTION REQUIRED MORE THAN
'MAX_BINLOG_CACHE_SIZE' ERROR
      
Problem:
=======
MySQL returns following error in win64.
"ERROR 1197 (HY000): Multi-statement transaction required more than
'max_binlog_cache_size' bytes of storage; increase this mysqld variable
and try again" when user tries to load >4G file even if
max_binlog_cache_size set to maximum value. On Linux everything
works fine.
      
Analysis:
========
The `max_binlog_cache_size' variable is of type `ulonglong'.  This
value is set to `ULONGLONG_MAX' at the time of server start up. The
above value is stored in an intermediate variable named
`saved_max_binlog_cache_size' which is of type `ulong'. In visual
c++ complier the `ulong' type is of 4bytes in size and hence the value
is getting truncated to '4GB' and the cache is not able to grow beyond
4GB size. The same limitation is observed with 
"max_binlog_stmt_cache_size" as well. Similar fix has been applied.
      
Fix:
===
As part of fix the type "ulong" is replaced with "my_off_t" which is of
type "ulonglong". 

mysys/mf_iocache.c:
  Added debug statement to simulate a scenario where the cache
  file's current position is set to >4GB
sql/log.cc:
  Replaced the type of `saved_max_binlog_cache_size' from "ulong" to
  "my_off_t", which is a type def for "ulonglong".
2012-07-24 16:26:16 +05:30
Alexander Barkov
9e75b58975 Merging from 5.1 2012-07-24 09:29:16 +04:00
Alexander Barkov
1cb513ba6b Fixing wrong copyright. Index.xml was modified in 2005,
while the copyright notice still mentioned 2003.
2012-07-24 09:27:00 +04:00
Chaithra Gopalareddy
0ef427ae3f Merge from 5.1 to 5.5 2012-07-18 15:18:15 +05:30
Chaithra Gopalareddy
ddcd6867e9 Bug#11762052: 54599: BUG IN QUERY PLANNER ON QUERIES WITH
"ORDER BY" AND "LIMIT BY" CLAUSE

PROBLEM:
When a 'limit' clause is specified in a query along with
group by and order by, optimizer chooses wrong index
there by examining more number of rows than required.
However without the 'limit' clause, optimizer chooses
the right index.

ANALYSIS:
With respect to the query specified, range optimizer chooses
the first index as there is a range present ( on 'a'). Optimizer
then checks for an index which would give records in sorted
order for the 'group by' clause.

While checking chooses the second index (on 'c,b,a') based on
the 'limit' specified and the selectivity of
'quick_condition_rows' (number of rows present in the range)
in 'test_if_skip_sort_order' function. 
But, it fails to consider that an order by clause on a
different column will result in scanning the entire index and 
hence the estimated number of rows calculated above are 
wrong (which results in choosing the second index).

FIX:
Do not enforce the 'limit' clause in the call to
'test_if_skip_sort_order' if we are creating a temporary
table. Creation of temporary table indicates that there would be
more post-processing and hence will need all the rows.

This fix is backported from 5.6. This problem is fixed in 5.6 as   
part of changes for work log #5558


mysql-test/r/subselect.result:
  Changes for Bug#11762052 results in the correct number of rows.
sql/sql_select.cc:
  Do not pass the actual 'limit' value if 'need_tmp' is true.
2012-07-18 14:36:08 +05:30
Annamalai Gurusami
f9d939178e Merging from mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. 2012-07-12 16:48:21 +05:30
Annamalai Gurusami
357a008ad3 Bug #11765218 58157: INNODB LOCKS AN UNMATCHED ROW EVEN THOUGH USING
RBR AND RC

Description: When scanning and locking rows with < or <=, InnoDB locks
the next row even though row based binary logging and read committed
is used.

Solution: In the handler, when the row is identified to fall outside
of the range (as specified in the query predicates), then request the
storage engine to unlock the row (if possible). This is done in
handler::read_range_first() and handler::read_range_next().
2012-07-12 16:42:07 +05:30
Bjorn Munch
1713550775 Merge unpushed changes from 5.1.64-release 2012-07-12 10:00:14 +02:00
Chaithra Gopalareddy
fc74e2e08f Bug #13444084:PRIMARY KEY OR UNIQUE KEY >453 BYTES FAILS FOR
COUNT DISTINCT GROUP BY

PROBLEM:
To calculate the final result of the count(distinct(select 1))
we call 'end_send' function instead of 'end_send_group'.
'end_send' cannot be called if we have aggregate functions
that need to be evaluated.

ANALYSIS:
While evaluating for a possible loose_index_scan option for
the query, the variable 'is_agg_distinct' is set to 'false'
as the item in the distinct clause is not a field. But, we
choose loose_index_scan by not taking this into 
consideration.
So, while setting the final 'select_function' to evaluate
the result, 'precomputed_group_by' is set to TRUE as in
this case loose_index_scan is chosen and we do not have
agg_distinct in the query (which is clearly wrong as we
have one).
As a result, 'end_send' function is chosen as the final
select_function instead of 'end_send_group'. The difference
between the two being, 'end_send_group' evaluates the
aggregates while 'end_send' does not. Hence the wrong result.

FIX:
The variable 'is_agg_distinct' always represents if 
'loose_idnex_scan' can be chosen for aggregate_distinct 
functions present in the select.
So, we check for this variable to continue with 
loose_index_scan option.


sql/opt_range.cc:
  Do not continue if is_agg_distinct is not set in case
  of agg_distinct functions.
2012-07-11 08:19:17 +05:30
Rohit Kalhans
6fe6288d83 bug#11759333:
follow-up patch for the failure on pb2 windows build
2012-07-10 22:02:25 +05:30
Mayank Prasad
3a71ab0805 Bug#13889741: HANDLE_FATAL_SIGNAL IN _DB_ENTER_ |HANDLE_FATAL_SIGNAL IN STRNLEN
Follow up patch to resolve pb2 failure on windows platform
2012-07-10 19:59:59 +05:30
Jon Olav Hauglid
a47e778a61 Bug#12623923 Server can crash after failure to create
primary key with innodb tables

The bug was triggered if a single ALTER TABLE statement both
added and dropped indexes and ALTER TABLE failed during drop
(e.g. because the index was needed in a foreign key constraint).
In such cases, the server index information would get out of
sync with InnoDB - the added index would be present inside
InnoDB, but not in the server. This could then lead to InnoDB
error messages and/or server crashes.

The root cause is that new indexes are added before old indexes
are dropped. This means that if ALTER TABLE fails while dropping
indexes, index changes will be reverted in the server but not
inside InnoDB.

This patch fixes the problem by dropping any added indexes
if drop fails (for ALTER TABLE statements that both adds
and drops indexes). 

However, this won't work if we added a primary key as this
key might not be possible to drop inside InnoDB. Therefore,
we resort to the copy algorithm if a primary key is added
by an ALTER TABLE statement that also drops an index.

In 5.6 this bug is more properly fixed by the handler interface
changes done in the scope of WL#5534 "Online ALTER".
2012-07-10 16:13:02 +02:00
Rohit Kalhans
6da51d1705 BUG#11759333: SBR LOGGING WARNING MESSAGES FOR PRIMARY
KEY UPDATES WITH A LIMIT OF 1

Problem: The unsafety warning for statements such as
update...limit1 where pk=1 are thrown when binlog-format
= STATEMENT,despite of the fact that such statements are
actually safe. this leads to filling up of the disk space 
with false warnings.
 
Solution: This is not a complete fix for the problem, but
prevents the disks from getting filled up. This should
therefore be regarded as a workaround. In the future this
should be overriden by server general suppress/filtering
framework. It should also be noted that another worklog is
supposed to defeat this case's artificial unsafety.

We use a warning suppression mechanism to detect warning flood,
enable the suppression, and disable this when the average
warnings/second has reduced to acceptable limits.
 
  Activation: The supression for LIMIT unsafe statements are
  activated when the last 50 warnings were logged in less 
  than 50 seconds. 
 
  Supression: Once activated this supression will prevent the
  individual warnings to be logged in the error log, but print
  the warning for every 50 warnings with the note:
  "The last warning was repeated N times in last S seconds"  
  Noteworthy is the fact that this supression works only on the
  error logs and the warnings seen by the clients will remain as
  it is (i.e. one warning/ unsafe statement)
 
  Deactivation: The supression will be deactivated once the
  average # of warnings/sec have gone down to the acceptable limits.



sql/sql_class.cc:
  Added code to supress warning while logging them to error-log.
2012-07-10 18:24:11 +05:30
Andrei Elkin
f4dc921596 merge from 5.5 repo. 2012-07-10 13:53:19 +03:00
Andrei Elkin
eca29d5f33 merge from 5.1 repo. 2012-07-10 13:00:03 +03:00
Sujatha Sivakumar
2e84cf8674 merge from 5.1 to 5.5 2012-07-10 14:37:35 +05:30
Sujatha Sivakumar
13f7f00288 BUG#11762670:MY_B_WRITE RETURN VALUE IGNORED
Problem:
=======
The return value from my_b_write is ignored by: `my_b_write_quoted',
`my_b_write_bit',`Query_log_event::print_query_header'

Most callers of `my_b_printf' ignore the return value. `log_event.cc' 
has many calls to it. 

Analysis:
========
`my_b_write' is used to write data into a file. If the write fails it
sets appropriate error number and error message through my_error()
function call and sets the IO_CACHE::error == -1.
`my_b_printf' function is also used to write data into a file, it
internally invokes my_b_write to do the write operation. Upon
success it returns number of characters written to file and on error
it returns -1 and sets the error through my_error() and also sets
IO_CACHE::error == -1.  Most of the event specific print functions
for example `Create_file_log_event::print', `Execute_load_log_event::print'
etc are the ones which make several calls to the above two functions and
they do not check for the return value after the 'print' call. All the above 
mentioned abuse cases deal with the client side.

Fix:
===
As part of bug fix a check for IO_CACHE::error == -1 has been added at 
a very high level after the call to the 'print' function.  There are 
few more places where the return value of "my_b_write" is ignored
those are mentioned below.

+++ mysys/mf_iocache2.c    2012-06-04 07:03:15 +0000
@@ -430,7 +430,8 @@
           memset(buffz, '0', minimum_width - length2);
         else
           memset(buffz, ' ', minimum_width - length2);
-        my_b_write(info, buffz, minimum_width - length2);

+++ sql/log.cc	2012-06-08 09:04:46 +0000
@@ -2388,7 +2388,12 @@
     {
       end= strxmov(buff, "# administrator command: ", NullS);
       buff_len= (ulong) (end - buff);
-      my_b_write(&log_file, (uchar*) buff, buff_len);

At these places appropriate return value handlers have been added.

client/mysqlbinlog.cc:
  check for IO_CACHE::error == -1 has been added after the call to
  the event specific print functions
mysys/mf_iocache2.c:
  Added handler to check the written value of `my_b_write'
sql/log.cc:
  Added handler to check the written value of `my_b_write'
sql/log_event.cc:
  Added error simulation statements in `Create_file_log_event::print`
  and `Execute_load_query_log_event::print'
sql/rpl_utility.h:
  Removed the extra ';'
2012-07-10 14:23:17 +05:30
Andrei Elkin
ab5b0a47f5 merge from 5.5 repo. 2012-07-06 14:06:04 +03:00
Andrei Elkin
ca2baa0f3b merge bug14275000 fixes to 5.5: sql/log_event.h. 2012-07-05 23:53:07 +03:00
Andrei Elkin
5841af19f7 merge bug14275000 fixes to 5.5 2012-07-05 16:14:47 +03:00
Andrei Elkin
e3c8fb4a1c Bug#14275000
Fixes for BUG11761686 left a flaw that managed to slip away from testing.
Only effective filtering branch was actually tested with a regression test
added to rpl_filter_tables_not_exist.
The reason of the failure is destuction of too early mem-root-allocated memory 
at the end of the deferred User-var's do_apply_event().

Fixed with bypassing free_root() in the deferred execution branch.
Deallocation of created in do_apply_event() items is done by the base code
through THD::cleanup_after_query() -> free_items() that the parent Query
can't miss.



sql/log_event.cc:
  Do not call free_root() in case the deferred User-var event.
  Necessary methods to the User-var class are added, do_apply_event() refined.
sql/log_event.h:
  Necessary methods to avoid destoying mem-root-based memory at
  User-var applying are defined.
2012-07-05 14:37:48 +03:00
Gleb Shchepa
659e76d8b4 auto-merge 2012-06-29 18:38:29 +04:00
Gleb Shchepa
521deaf36f minor update to make MSVS happy 2012-06-29 18:24:43 +04:00
Georgi Kodinov
e65c291807 merge bug#13708485 5.1->5.5 2012-06-29 16:54:55 +03:00
Jon Olav Hauglid
66ef5b0d48 Bug#14238406 NEW COMPILATION WARNINGS WITH GCC 4.7 (-WERROR=NARROWING)
Manual merge from mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5
2012-06-29 13:36:01 +02:00
Jon Olav Hauglid
1ede2dd814 Bug#14238406 NEW COMPILATION WARNINGS WITH GCC 4.7 (-WERROR=NARROWING)
This patch fixes various compilation warnings of the type
"error: narrowing conversion of 'x' from 'datatype1' to
'datatype2'
2012-06-29 13:25:57 +02:00
Georgi Kodinov
d672a10593 Bug #12910665: AUTH-PLUGIN-DATA-LEN NOT TESTED FOR VALIDITY BY THE
CLIENT

Added a check for a negative second part of the scramble length.
2012-06-29 14:04:24 +03:00
Gleb Shchepa
4661d95433 manual merge (WL6219)
sql/sql_yacc.yy:
  manual merge (backport of WL6219)
2012-06-29 14:12:21 +04:00
Gleb Shchepa
767501fb54 Backport of the deprecation warning from WL#6219: "Deprecate and remove YEAR(2) type"
Print the warning(note):

 YEAR(x) is deprecated and will be removed in a future release. Please use YEAR(4) instead

on "CREATE TABLE ... YEAR(x)" or "ALTER TABLE MODIFY ... YEAR(x)", where x != 4
2012-06-29 12:55:45 +04:00