Fix incorrect change introduced in the fix for MDEV-20109.
The patch tried to compute a more precise estimate for the record_count
value in SJ-Materialization-Scan strategy (in
Sj_materialization_picker::check_qep). However the new formula is worse
as it produces extremely optimistic results in common cases where
SJ-Materialization-Scan should be used)
The old formula produces pessimistic results in cases when Sj-Materialization-
Scan is unlikely to be a good choice anyway. So, the old behavior is better.
(Backported to 10.3, addressed review input)
Sj_materialization_picker::check_qep(): fix error in cost/fanout
calculations:
- for each join prefix, add #prefix_rows / TIME_FOR_COMPARE to the cost,
like best_extension_by_limited_search does
- Remove the fanout produced by the subquery tables.
- Also take into account join condition selectivity
optimize_wo_join_buffering() (used by LooseScan and FirstMatch)
- also add #prefix_rows / TIME_FOR_COMPARE to the cost of each prefix.
- Also take into account join condition selectivity
Parenthesis around table names and derived tables should be allowed
in FROM clauses and some other context as it was in earlier versions.
Returned test queries that used such parenthesis in 10.3 to their
original form. Adjusted test results accordingly.
Condition can be pushed from the HAVING clause into the WHERE clause
if it depends only on the fields that are used in the GROUP BY list
or depends on the fields that are equal to grouping fields.
Aggregate functions can't be pushed down.
How the pushdown is performed on the example:
SELECT t1.a,MAX(t1.b)
FROM t1
GROUP BY t1.a
HAVING (t1.a>2) AND (MAX(c)>12);
=>
SELECT t1.a,MAX(t1.b)
FROM t1
WHERE (t1.a>2)
GROUP BY t1.a
HAVING (MAX(c)>12);
The implementation scheme:
1. Extract the most restrictive condition cond from the HAVING clause of
the select that depends only on the fields that are used in the GROUP BY
list of the select (directly or indirectly through equalities)
2. Save cond as a condition that can be pushed into the WHERE clause
of the select
3. Remove cond from the HAVING clause if it is possible
The optimization is implemented in the function
st_select_lex::pushdown_from_having_into_where().
New test file having_cond_pushdown.test is created.
This patch contains a full implementation of the optimization
that allows to use in-memory rowid / primary filters built for range
conditions over indexes. In many cases usage of such filters reduce
the number of disk seeks spent for fetching table rows.
In this implementation the choice of what possible filter to be applied
(if any) is made purely on cost-based considerations.
This implementation re-achitectured the partial implementation of
the feature pushed by Galina Shalygina in the commit
8d5a11122c.
Besides this patch contains a better implementation of the generic
handler function handler::multi_range_read_info_const() that
takes into account gaps between ranges when calculating the cost of
range index scans. It also contains some corrections of the
implementation of the handler function records_in_range() for MyISAM.
This patch supports the feature for InnoDB and MyISAM.
