Commit graph

29080 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Neeraj Bisht
6a23a44495 Bug#17222452 - SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT A,B) INCORRECTLY COUNTS ROWS
CONTAINING NULL

Problem:-
In MySQL, We can obtain the number of distinct expression
combinations that do not contain NULL by giving a list of 
expressions in COUNT(DISTINCT).
However rows with NULL values are
incorrectly included in the count when loose index scan is 
used.

Analysis:-
In case of loose index scan, we check whether the field is null or 
not and increase the count in Item_sum_count::add().
But there we are checking for the first field in COUNT(DISTINCT), 
not for every field. This is causing an incorrect result.

Solution:-
Check all field in Item_sum_count::add(), whether there values 
are null or not. Then only increment the count.
******
Bug#17222452 - SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT A,B) INCORRECTLY COUNTS ROWS 
	       CONTAINING NULL

Problem:-
In MySQL, We can obtain the number of distinct expression
combinations that do not contain NULL by giving a list of 
expressions in COUNT(DISTINCT).
However rows with NULL values are
incorrectly included in the count when loose index scan is 
used.

Analysis:-
In case of loose index scan, we check whether the field is null or 
not and increase the count in Item_sum_count::add().
But there we are checking for the first field in COUNT(DISTINCT), 
not for every field. This is causing an incorrect result.

Solution:-
Check all field in Item_sum_count::add(), whether there values 
are null or not. Then only increment the count.
2013-09-04 10:45:55 +05:30
Neeraj Bisht
d4b4c8274b Bug#16346241 - SERVER CRASH IN ITEM_PARAM::QUERY_VAL_STR
Problem:-
Second execution of prepared statement for query with 
parameter in limit clause, causes an assert when using 
connectors (e.g., Connector C).  


Analysis:-
In prepared statement, LIMIT parameters can be
specified using '?' markers. Value for the parameter can
be supplied while executing the prepared statement.

Passing string, float or double values for LIMIT clause
works well from command-line client. That's because, while 
setting the LIMIT parameter value from a user-variable,
the value is converted to integer value.

However, when prepared statement is executed from other
interfaces as J connectors, or C applications etc,
the value for the parameters are sent to the server
with execute command. Each item in command has value and
the data TYPE. So, while setting parameter values
from this log, value is set to all the parameters
with the same data type as passed.
Here, we have the logic to convert the value to change the 
state and item_type if it is part of LIMIT parameter and 
its item_type is not INT.
But when we reset this parameter we save the item_type but change 
state. So on second execution we have old item_type but our state 
has been changed, which make us to use string type variable 
in Item_param::query_str_val(). This cause an assert.

Fix:
Instead of checking the item_type of the parameter, check for 
the state of the parameter. As state value are reset everytime
we execute the statement.
2013-08-28 14:54:53 +05:30
Dmitry Lenev
4582478214 Fix for bug #17356954 "CANNOT USE SAVEPOINTS AFTER ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK OR
ER_LOCK_WAIT_TIMEOUT".

The problem was that after changes caused by fix bug 14188793 "DEADLOCK
CAUSED BY ALTER TABLE DOEN'T CLEAR STATUS OF ROLLBACKED TRANSACTION"/
bug 17054007 "TRANSACTION IS NOT FULLY ROLLED BACK IN CASE OF INNODB
DEADLOCK implicit rollback of transaction which occurred on ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK
(and ER_LOCK_WAIT_TIMEOUT if innodb_rollback_on_timeout option was set)
didn't start new transaction in @@autocommit=1 mode.

Such behavior although consistent with behavior of explicit ROLLBACK has
broken expectations of users and backward compatibility assumptions.

This patch fixes problem by reverting to starting new transaction
in 5.5/5.6.

The plan is to keep new behavior in trunk so the code change from this
patch is to be null-merged there.
2013-08-26 14:43:12 +04:00
Praveenkumar Hulakund
45daf55a55 Bug#11765252 - READ OF FREED MEMORY WHEN "USE DB" AND
"SHOW PROCESSLIST"

Follow up path, addressing pb2 test failure.
2013-08-23 18:56:31 +05:30
Neeraj Bisht
0cf9f5e773 Bug#17029399 - CRASH IN ITEM_REF::FIX_FIELDS WITH TRIGGER ERRORS
Problem:-
In a Procedure, when we are comparing value of select query 
with IN clause and they both have different collation, cause 
error on first time execution and assert second time.
procedure will have query like
set @x = ((select a from t1) in (select d from t2));<---proc1
              sel1                   sel2

Analysis:-
When we execute this proc1(first time)
While resolving the fields of user variable, we will call 
Item_in_subselect::fix_fields while will resolve sel2. There 
in Item_in_subselect::select_transformer, we evaluate the 
left expression(sel1) and store it in Item_cache_* object 
(to avoid re-evaluating it many times during subquery execution) 
by making Item_in_optimizer class.
While evaluating left expression we will prepare sel1.
After that, we will put a new condition in sel2  
in Item_in_subselect::select_transformer() which will compare 
t2.d and sel1(which is cached in Item_in_optimizer).

Later while checking the collation in agg_item_collations() 
we get error and we cleanup the item. While cleaning up we cleaned 
the cached value in Item_in_optimizer object.

When we execute the procedure second time, we have condition for 
sel2 and while setup_cond(), we can't able to find reference item 
as it is cleanup while item cleanup.So it assert.


Solution:-
We should not cleanup the cached value for Item_in_optimizer object, 
if we have put the condition to subselect.
2013-08-23 16:56:17 +05:30
Neeraj Bisht
4f0e7c036d Bug#17029399 - CRASH IN ITEM_REF::FIX_FIELDS WITH TRIGGER ERRORS
Problem:-
In a Procedure, when we are comparing value of select query 
with IN clause and they both have different collation, cause 
error on first time execution and assert second time.
procedure will have query like
set @x = ((select a from t1) in (select d from t2));<---proc1
              sel1                   sel2

Analysis:-
When we execute this proc1(first time)
While resolving the fields of user variable, we will call 
Item_in_subselect::fix_fields while will resolve sel2. There 
in Item_in_subselect::select_transformer, we evaluate the 
left expression(sel1) and store it in Item_cache_* object 
(to avoid re-evaluating it many times during subquery execution) 
by making Item_in_optimizer class.
While evaluating left expression we will prepare sel1.
After that, we will put a new condition in sel2  
in Item_in_subselect::select_transformer() which will compare 
t2.d and sel1(which is cached in Item_in_optimizer).

Later while checking the collation in agg_item_collations() 
we get error and we cleanup the item. While cleaning up we cleaned 
the cached value in Item_in_optimizer object.

When we execute the procedure second time, we have condition for 
sel2 and while setup_cond(), we can't able to find reference item 
as it is cleanup while item cleanup.So it assert.


Solution:-
We should not cleanup the cached value for Item_in_optimizer object, 
if we have put the condition to subselect.
2013-08-23 16:54:25 +05:30
Ashish Agarwal
d75c58e11f WL#7076: Backporting wl6715 to support both formats
in 5.5, 5.6, 5.7.
2013-08-23 09:07:09 +05:30
Praveenkumar Hulakund
39932dcffa Bug#11765252 - READ OF FREED MEMORY WHEN "USE DB" AND
"SHOW PROCESSLIST"

Merging from 5.1 to 5.5
2013-08-21 10:44:22 +05:30
Praveenkumar Hulakund
10a6aa256e Bug#11765252 - READ OF FREED MEMORY WHEN "USE DB" AND
"SHOW PROCESSLIST"

Analysis:
----------
The problem here is, if one connection changes its
default db and at the same time another connection executes
"SHOW PROCESSLIST", when it wants to read db of the another
connection then there is a chance of accessing the invalid
memory. 

The db name stored in THD is not guarded while changing user
DB and while reading the user DB in "SHOW PROCESSLIST".
So, if THD.db is freed by thd "owner" thread and if another
thread executing "SHOW PROCESSLIST" statement tries to read
and copy THD.db at the same time then we may endup in the issue
reported here.

Fix:
----------
Used mutex "LOCK_thd_data" to guard THD.db while freeing it
and while copying it to processlist.
2013-08-21 10:39:40 +05:30
Dmitry Lenev
b07ec61f85 Fix for bug#14188793 - "DEADLOCK CAUSED BY ALTER TABLE DOEN'T CLEAR
STATUS OF ROLLBACKED TRANSACTION" and bug #17054007 - "TRANSACTION
IS NOT FULLY ROLLED BACK IN CASE OF INNODB DEADLOCK".

The problem in the first bug report was that although deadlock involving
metadata locks was reported using the same error code and message as InnoDB
deadlock it didn't rollback transaction like the latter. This caused
confusion to users as in some cases after ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK transaction
could have been restarted immediately and in some cases rollback was
required.

The problem in the second bug report was that although InnoDB deadlock
caused transaction rollback in all storage engines it didn't cause release
of metadata locks. So concurrent DDL on the tables used in transaction was
blocked until implicit or explicit COMMIT or ROLLBACK was issued in the
connection which got InnoDB deadlock.

The former issue has stemmed from the fact that when support for detection
and reporting metadata locks deadlocks was added we erroneously assumed
that InnoDB doesn't rollback transaction on deadlock but only last statement
(while this is what happens on InnoDB lock timeout actually) and so didn't
implement rollback of transactions on MDL deadlocks.

The latter issue was caused by the fact that rollback of transaction due
to deadlock is carried out by setting THD::transaction_rollback_request
flag at the point where deadlock is detected and performing rollback
inside of trans_rollback_stmt() call when this flag is set. And
trans_rollback_stmt() is not aware of MDL locks, so no MDL locks are
released.

This patch solves these two problems in the following way:

- In case when MDL deadlock is detect transaction rollback is requested
  by setting THD::transaction_rollback_request flag.

- Code performing rollback of transaction if THD::transaction_rollback_request
  is moved out from trans_rollback_stmt(). Now we handle rollback request
  on the same level as we call trans_rollback_stmt() and release statement/
  transaction MDL locks.
2013-08-20 13:12:34 +04:00
Mattias Jonsson
9a132fa76c Bug#16860588:CRASH WITH CREATE TABLE ... LIKE ..
AND PARTITION VALUES IN (NULL)

The code assumed there was at least one list element
in LIST partitioned table.

Fixed by checking the number of list elements.
2013-08-12 11:09:33 +02:00
Neeraj Bisht
37430ee3e1 Bug#16614004 - CRASH AFTER READING FREED MEMORY AFTER DOING DDL
IN STORED ROUTINE

Inside a loop in a stored procedure, we create a partitioned
table. The CREATE statement is thus treated as a prepared statement:
it is prepared once, and then executed by each iteration. Thus its Lex
is reused many times. This Lex contains a part_info member, which
describes how the partitions should be laid out, including the
partitioning function. Each execution of the CREATE does this, in
open_table_from_share ():
    
       tmp= mysql_unpack_partition(thd, share->partition_info_str,
                                   share->partition_info_str_len,
                                   outparam, is_create_table,
                                   share->default_part_db_type,
                                   &work_part_info_used);
    ...
       tmp= fix_partition_func(thd, outparam, is_create_table);
The first line calls init_lex_with_single_table() which creates
a TABLE_LIST, necessary for the "field fixing" which will be
done by the second line; this is how it is created:
     if ((!(table_ident= new Table_ident(thd,
                                         table->s->db,
                                         table->s->table_name, TRUE))) ||
         (!(table_list= select_lex->add_table_to_list(thd,
                                                      table_ident,
                                                      NULL,
                                                       0))))
          return TRUE;
  it is allocated in the execution memory root.
Then the partitioning function ("id", stored in Lex -> part_info)
  is fixed, which calls Item_ident:: fix_fields (), which resolves
"id" to the table_list above, and stores in the item's
cached_table a pointer to this table_list. 
The table is created, later it is dropped by another statement,
then we execute again the prepared CREATE. This reuses the Lex,
thus also its part_info, thus also the item representing the
partitioning function (part_info is cloned but it's a shallow
cloning); CREATE wants to fix the item again (which is
normal, every execution fixes items again), fix_fields ()
sees that the cached_table pointer is set and picks up the
pointed table_list. But this last object does not exist
anymore (it was allocated in the execution memory root of
the previous execution, so it has been freed), so we access
invalid memory.

The solution: when creating the table_list, mark that it
cannot be cached.
2013-08-12 19:46:44 +05:30
Venkatesh Duggirala
472ce17be8 Bug#16416302 - CRASH WITH LOSSY RBR REPLICATION
OF OLD STYLE DECIMALS

Problem: In RBR, Slave is unable to read row buffer
properly when the row event contains MYSQL_TYPE_DECIMAL
(old style decimals) data type column.

Analysis: In RBR, Slave assumes that Master sends
meta data information for all column types like
text,blob,varchar,old decimal,new decimal,float,
and few  other types along with row buffer event.
But Master is not sending this meta data information
for old style decimal columns. Hence Slave is crashing
due to unknown precision value for these column types.
Master cannot send this precision value to Slave which
will break replication cross-version compatibility.

Fix: To fix the crash, Slave will now throw error if it
receives old-style decimal datatype. User should
consider changing the old-style decimal to new style
decimal data type by executing "ALTER table modify column"
query as mentioned in http://dev.mysql.com/
doc/refman/5.0/en/upgrading-from-previous-series.html.
2013-08-07 07:56:07 +05:30
prabakaran thirumalai
c58d70910b Bug#17083851 BACKPORT BUG#11765744 TO 5.1, 5.5 AND 5.6
Description:
Original fix Bug#11765744 changed mutex to read write lock
to avoid multiple recursive lock acquire operation on 
LOCK_status mutex.  
On Windows, locking read-write lock recursively is not safe. 
Slim read-write locks, which MySQL uses if they are supported by
Windows version, do not support recursion according to their 
documentation. For our own implementation of read-write lock, 
which is used in cases when Windows version doesn't support SRW,
recursive locking of read-write lock can easily lead to deadlock
if there are concurrent lock requests.
      
Fix:  
This patch reverts the previous fix for bug#11765744 that used
read-write locks. Instead problem of recursive locking for
LOCK_status mutex is solved by tracking recursion level using 
counter in THD object and acquiring lock only once when we enter 
fill_status() function first time.
2013-07-30 09:51:14 +05:30
prabakaran thirumalai
d95e57a328 Bug#17083851 BACKPORT BUG#11765744 TO 5.1, 5.5 AND 5.6
Description:
Original fix Bug#11765744 changed mutex to read write lock
to avoid multiple recursive lock acquire operation on 
LOCK_status mutex.  
On Windows, locking read-write lock recursively is not safe. 
Slim read-write locks, which MySQL uses if they are supported by
Windows version, do not support recursion according to their 
documentation. For our own implementation of read-write lock, 
which is used in cases when Windows version doesn't support SRW,
recursive locking of read-write lock can easily lead to deadlock
if there are concurrent lock requests.

Fix:  
This patch reverts the previous fix for bug#11765744 that used
read-write locks. Instead problem of recursive locking for
LOCK_status mutex is solved by tracking recursion level using 
counter in THD object and acquiring lock only once when we enter 
fill_status() function first time.
2013-07-30 09:44:11 +05:30
Aditya A
900c5714ad Bug #11766851 QUERYING I_S.PARTITIONS CHANGES THE CARDINALITY OF THE
PARTITIONS.

ANALYSIS
--------
Whenever we query I_S.partitions,
ha_partition::get_dynamic_partition_info()
is called which resets the cardinality 
according to the number of rows in last
partition.

Fix
---
When we call get_dynamic_partition_info() 
avoid passing the flag HA_STATUS_CONST
to info() since HA_STATUS_CONST should 
ideally not be called for per partition.

[Approved by mattiasj rb#2830 ]
2013-07-29 11:41:13 +05:30
Venkatesh Duggirala
bf2c49d33c BUG#16290902 DROP TEMP TABLE IF EXISTS CAN CAUSE POINT
IN TIME RECOVERY FAILURE ON SLAVES

Problem:
DROP TEMP TABLE IF EXISTS commands can cause point
in time recovery (re-applying binlog) failures.

Analyses:
In RBR, 'DROP TEMPORARY TABLE' commands are
always binlogged by adding 'IF EXISTS' clauses.
Also, the slave SQL thread will not check replicate.* filter
rules for "DROP TEMPORARY TABLE IF EXISTS" queries.
If log-slave-updates is enabled on slave, these queries
will be binlogged in the format of "USE `db`;
DROP TEMPORARY TABLE IF EXISTS `t1`;" irrespective
of filtering rules and irrespective of the `db` existence.
When users try to recover slave from it's own binlog,
use `db` command might fail if `db` is not present on slave.

Fix:
At the time of writing the 'DROP TEMPORARY TABLE
IF EXISTS' query into the binlog, 'use `db`' will not be
present and the table name in the query will be a fully
qualified table name.
Eg:
'USE `db`; DROP TEMPORARY TABLE IF EXISTS `t1`;'
will be logged as
'DROP TEMPORARY TABLE IF EXISTS `db`.`t1`;'.
2013-07-27 17:35:02 +05:30
Guilhem Bichot
b420ff4983 Fix for Bug#16614004 CRASH AFTER READING FREED MEMORY AFTER DOING DDL IN STORED ROUTINE
Inside a loop in a stored procedure, we create a partitioned
table. The CREATE statement is thus treated as a prepared statement:
it is prepared once, and then executed by each iteration. Thus its Lex
is reused many times. This Lex contains a part_info member, which
describes how the partitions should be laid out, including the
partitioning function. Each execution of the CREATE does this, in
open_table_from_share ():

    tmp= mysql_unpack_partition(thd, share->partition_info_str,
                                share->partition_info_str_len,
                                outparam, is_create_table,
                                share->default_part_db_type,
                                &work_part_info_used);
 ...
      tmp= fix_partition_func(thd, outparam, is_create_table);
The first line calls init_lex_with_single_table() which creates
a TABLE_LIST, necessary for the "field fixing" which will be
done by the second line; this is how it is created:
  if ((!(table_ident= new Table_ident(thd,
                                      table->s->db,
                                      table->s->table_name, TRUE))) ||
      (!(table_list= select_lex->add_table_to_list(thd,
                                                   table_ident,
                                                   NULL,
                                                   0))))
    return TRUE;
it is allocated in the execution memory root.
Then the partitioning function ("id", stored in Lex -> part_info)
is fixed, which calls Item_ident:: fix_fields (), which resolves
"id" to the table_list above, and stores in the item's
cached_table a pointer to this table_list. 
The table is created, later it is dropped by another statement,
then we execute again the prepared CREATE. This reuses the Lex,
thus also its part_info, thus also the item representing the
partitioning function (part_info is cloned but it's a shallow
cloning); CREATE wants to fix the item again (which is
normal, every execution fixes items again), fix_fields ()
sees that the cached_table pointer is set and picks up the
pointed table_list. But this last object does not exist
anymore (it was allocated in the execution memory root of
the previous execution, so it has been freed), so we access
invalid memory.
The solution: when creating the table_list, mark that it
cannot be cached.
2013-07-24 14:33:52 +02:00
Praveenkumar Hulakund
0ae219cd75 Bug#16865959 - PLEASE BACKPORT BUG 14749800.
Since log_throttle is not available in 5.5. Logging of
error message for failure of thread to create new connection
in "create_thread_to_handle_connection" is not backported.

Since, function "my_plugin_log_message" is not available in 
5.5 version and since there is incompatibility between
sql_print_XXX function compiled with g++ and alog files with
gcc to use sql_print_error, changes related to audit log
plugin is not backported.
2013-07-24 15:44:41 +05:30
Annamalai Gurusami
64c58c13d5 Bug #14017206 WITH CONSISTENT SNAPSHOT DOES NOT WORK WITH ISOLATION LEVEL
SERIALIZABLE

Problem:

The documentation claims that WITH CONSISTENT SNAPSHOT will work for both
REPEATABLE READ and SERIALIZABLE isolation levels.  But it will work only
for REPEATABLE READ isolation level.  Also, the clause WITH CONSISTENT
SNAPSHOT is silently ignored when it is not applicable to the given isolation
level.  

Solution:

Generate a warning when the clause WITH CONSISTENT SNAPSHOT is ignored.

rb#2797 approved by Kevin.

Note: Support team wanted to push this to 5.5+.
2013-07-10 10:49:17 +05:30
Ashish Agarwal
f5b5e6b951 WL#7076: Backporting wl6715 to support both formats in 5.5, 5.6, 5.7
Backporting wl6715 to mysql-5.5
2013-07-02 11:58:39 +05:30
Mattias Jonsson
4fdb955542 Bug#16589511: MYSQL_UPGRADE FAILS TO WRITE OUT ENTIRE
ALTER TABLE ... ALGORITHM= ... STATEMENT

The problem was an intermediate buffer of smaller size,
which truncated the alter statement.

Solved by providing the size of the buffer to be allocated through
the function call, instead of using an one-size-fits-all stack buffer
inside the function.
2013-06-28 13:18:16 +02:00
Sujatha Sivakumar
318077c4f9 Bug#16753869:INCORRECT TRUNCATION OF LONG SET EXPRESSION IN
LOAD DATA CAN CAUSE SQL INJECTION

Problem:
=======
A long SET expression in LOAD DATA is incorrectly truncated
when written to the binary log.

Analysis:
========
LOAD DATA statements are reconstructed once again before
they are written to the binary log. When SET clauses are
specified as part of LOAD DATA statement, these SET clause
user command strings need to be stored as it is inorder to
reconstruct the original user command.  At present these
strings are stored as part of SET clause item tree's
top most Item node's name itself which is incorrect. As an
Item::name can be of MAX_ALIAS_NAME (256) size. Hence the
name will get truncated to "255".

Because of this the rewritten LOAD DATA statement will be
terminated incorrectly.  When this statment is read back by
the mysqlbinlog tool it reads a starting single quote and
continuos to read till it finds an ending quote. Hence any
statement written post ending quote will be considered as
a new statement.

Fix:
===
As name field has length restriction the string value
should not be stored in Item::name.  A new String list is
maintained to store the SET expression values and this list
is read during reconstrution.
2013-06-24 11:11:55 +05:30
Tor Didriksen
966e1a42d9 Bug#16945503 ADDRESSSANITIZER BUG IN SYS_VARS
Sys_var_keycache inherits from some variant of Sys_var_integer

Instances of Sys_var_keycache are initialized using the KEYCACHE_VAR macro,
which takes an offset within st_key_cache.
However, the Sys_var_integer CTOR treats the offset as if it was within
global_system_variables (hidden within some layers of macros and fuction
pointers)

The result is that we write arbitrary data to arbitrary locations in memory.
This all happens during static initialization of global objects,
i.e. before we have even entered the main() function.


Bug#12325449 TYPO IN CMAKE/DTRACE.CMAKE
Fix typo in dtrace.cmake
2013-06-21 14:18:01 +02:00
Tor Didriksen
82d9c8e8d9 Bug#14834378 ADDRESSSANITIZER BUG IN FILENAME_TO_TABLENAME
Backport to 5.5
2013-06-14 16:38:27 +02:00
Tor Didriksen
a040586cce Bug#16729109: FIX COMPILATION WARNINGS WITH GCC 4.8
Backport to 5.5
(external Bug#69407 Build warnings with mysql)
2013-06-14 10:52:23 +02:00
Aditya A
3373a7ed46 Bug#13548704 ALGORITHM USED FOR DROPPING PARTITIONED TABLE CAN LEAD
TO INCONSISTENCY 
[Merge from 5.1]
2013-06-14 11:28:29 +05:30
Aditya A
5f3c0a451d Bug#13548704 ALGORITHM USED FOR DROPPING PARTITIONED TABLE CAN LEAD
TO INCONSISTENCY 

PROBLEM
--------
When we drop a partitoned table , we first gather the
information about partitions in the table from the 
table_name.par file and store it in an internal data 
structure.Then we delete this file and the data in 
the table. If the server crashes  after deleting the
file,then after recovering we cannot access the table
.Even we cannot drop the table ,because drop algorithm
requires par file to read the partition information.


FIX
---
1. We move the part of deleting par file after deleting 
   all the table data from the storage egine.
2. During drop operation if we detect that the par 
   file is missing then we delete the .frm file,since 
   there is no way of recovering without par file.
  
[Approved by Mattias rb#2576 ]
2013-06-14 11:22:05 +05:30
Sivert Sorumgard
e7d8f19bc1 Bug #14227431: CHARACTER SET MISMATCH WHEN ALTERING FOREIGN KEYS
CAN LEAD TO MISSING TABLES

Overview
--------
If the FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS system variable is set to 0, it is
possible to break a foreign key constraint by changing the type
or character set of the foreign key column, or by dropping the
foreign key index (without carrying out corresponding changes on
another table in the relationship).

If we subsequently set FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS to 1 and execute ALTER
TABLE involving the COPY algorithm on such a table, the following
happens:

1) If ALTER TABLE does not contain a RENAME clause, the attempt 
   to install the new version of the table instead of the old one
   will fail due to the fact that the inconsistency will be 
   detected. An attempt to revert the partially executed alter 
   table operation by restoring the old table definition will 
   fail as well due to FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS == 1. As a result, the 
   table being altered will be lost.
2) If ALTER TABLE contains the RENAME clause, the inconsistency 
   will not be detected (most probably due to other bugs). But if
   an attempt to install the new version of the table fails (for 
   example, due to a failure when updating triggers associated 
   with the table), reverting the partially executed alter table 
   by restoring the old table definition will fail too. So the 
   table being altered might be lost as well.


Suggested fix
-------------
The suggested fix is to temporarily unset the option bit
representing FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS when the old table definition is
restored while reverting the partially executed operation.
2013-06-12 09:35:33 +02:00
Murthy Narkedimilli
cf2d852653 Fixing the bug 16919882 - WRONG FSF ADDRESS IN LICENSES HEADERS 2013-06-10 22:29:41 +02:00
Murthy Narkedimilli
8325f2cf78 Bug 16919882 - WRONG FSF ADDRESS IN LICENSES HEADERS 2013-06-11 01:13:07 +05:30
Maitrayi Sabaratnam
94a708f5cf 4371 Maitrayi Sabaratnam 2013-05-23
Bug#13116514 - CREATE LOGFILE GROUP INITIAL_SIZE & UNDO_BUFFER_SIZE FAILS
      
      Fixing parser to accept the syntax: to give a size with suffix 'M', eg. undo_buffer_size=10M (M for mega bytes), in 'create logfile group' command.
2013-05-24 18:17:36 +02:00
Chaithra Gopalareddy
5bf9b7d0cb Bug #16119355: PREPARED STATEMENT: READ OF FREED MEMORY WITH
STRING CONVERSION FUNCTIONS
            
Problem:
While executing the prepared statement, user variable is
set to memory which would be freed at the end of
execution.
If the statement is executed again, valgrind throws
error when accessing this pointer.
                  
Analysis:
                
1. First time when Item_func_set_user_var::check is called,
   memory is allocated for "value" to store the result.
   (In the call to copy_if_not_alloced).
2. While sending the result, Item_func_set_user_var::check
   is called again. But, this time, its called with
   "use_result_field" set to true. 
   As a result, we call result_field->val_str(&value).
3. Here memory allocated for "value" gets freed. And "value"
   gets set to "result_field", with "str_length" being that of
   result_field's.
4. In the call to JOIN::cleanup, result_field's memory gets
   freed as this is allocated in a chunk as part of the
   temporary table which is needed to execute the query.
5. Next time, when execute of the same statement is called,
   "value" will be set to memory which is already freed.
   Valgrind error occurs as "str_length" is positive 
   (set at Step 3)
                  
Note that user variables list is stored as part of the Lex object
in set_var_list. Hence the persistance across executions.
            
Solution:
Patch for Bug#11764371 fixed in mysql-5.6+ fixes this problem 
as well.So backporting the same.
            
In the solution for Bug#11764371, we create another object of 
user_var and repoint it to temp_table's field. As a result while 
deleting the alloced buffer in Step 3, since the cloned object 
does not own the buffer, deletion will not happen.
So at step 5 when we execute the statement second time, the 
original object will be used and since deletion did not happen 
valgrind will not complain about dangling pointer.
2013-05-23 15:00:31 +05:30
Chaithra Gopalareddy
d0367abaff Bug#11766191:INVALID MEMORY READ IN DO_DIV_MOD WITH DOUBLY ASSIGNED VARIABLES
Bug#12608543: CRASHES WITH DECIMALS AND STATEMENT NEEDS TO BE REPREPARED ERRORS

Backporting these two fixes to 5.1 
Added unittest to test my_decimal construtor and assignment operators
2013-05-22 14:36:43 +05:30
Ashish Agarwal
918b6a3e7a Bug#16194302: SUPPORT FOR FLOATING-POINT SYSTEM VARIABLES
USING THE PLUGIN INTERFACE.

ISSUE: No support for floating-point plugin
       system variables.

SOLUTION: Allowing plugins to define and expose floating-point
          system variables of type double. MYSQL_SYSVAR_DOUBLE
          and MYSQL_THDVAR_DOUBLE are added.

ISSUE: Fractional part of the def, min, max values of system
       variables are ignored.

SOLUTION: Adding functions that are used to store the raw
          representation of a double in the raw bits of unsigned
          longlong in a way that the binary representation
          remains the same.
2013-05-19 23:38:06 +05:30
Mattias Jonsson
23c5840d52 Bug#16447483: PARTITION PRUNING IS NOT CORRECT FOR RANGE COLUMNS
The problem was in get_partition_id_cols_range_for_endpoint
and cmp_rec_and_tuple_prune, which stepped one partition too long.

Solution was to move a small portion of logic to cmp_rec_and_tuple_prune,
to simplify both get_partition_id_cols_range_for_endpoint and
get_partition_id_cols_list_for_endpoint.
2013-05-16 11:02:39 +02:00
Shubhangi Garg
1a613f89a8 Bug#16607258 :Linker Errors Due To Inclusion Of An Implementation File
In log_event.h
      
DESCRIPTION:
Due to inclusion of an implementation file, namely 'rpl_tblmap.cc'
in a header file, namely 'log_event.h'; linker errors occur if
log_event.h is included in an application containing multiple source
files, such as in the case of Binlog API.
      
Binlog API requires including log_event.h in its source files;
which leads to multiple definition errors, for functions defined
in rpl_tblmap.cc for class 'table_mapping'.
            
FIX:
Change the inclusion from header file(log_event.h) to source files
using this header and have flag MYSQL_CLIENT set. The only file in
the current server repository is mysqlbinlog.cc.
2013-05-14 22:52:42 +05:30
Neeraj Bisht
2812634b6c Bug#12328597 - MULTIPLE COUNT(DISTINCT) IN SAME SELECT FALSE
WITH COMPOSITE KEY COLUMNS

Problem:-
While running a SELECT query with several AGGR(DISTINCT) function 
and these are referring to different field of same composite key, 
Returned incorrect value.

Analysis:-

In a table, where we have composite key like (a,b,c)
and when we give a query like

select COUNT(DISTINCT b), SUM(DISTINCT a) from ....

here, we first make a list of items in Aggr(distinct) function
(which is a, b), where order of item doesn't matter. 
and then we see, whether we have a composite key where the prefix 
of index columns matches the items of the aggregation function.
(in this case we have a,b,c).

if yes, so we can use loose index scan and we need not perform 
duplicate removal to distinct in our aggregate function.

In our table, we traverse column marked with <-- and get the result as
(a,b,c)      count(distinct b)           sum(distinct a)
             treated as count b          treated as sum(a)
(1,1,2)<--              1                      1		
(1,2,2)<--              1++=2                  1+1=2
(1,2,3)		
(2,1,2)<--              2++=3                  1+1+2=4
(2,2,2)<--              3++=4                  1+1+2+2=6
(2,2,3)

result will be 4,6, but it should be (2,3)

As in this case, our assumption is incorrect. If we have
query like 
select count(distinct a,b), sum(distinct a,b)from ..
then we can use loose index scan

Solution:-
In our query, when we have more then one aggr(distinct) function 
then they should refer to same  fields like

select count(distinct a,b), sum(distinct a,b) from .. 

-->we can use loose scan index as both aggr(distinct) refer to same fields a,b.

If they are referring to different field like

select count(distinct a), sum(distinct b) from .. 

-->will not use loose scan index as both aggr(distinct) refer to different fields.
2013-05-13 17:15:25 +05:30
Chaithra Gopalareddy
4203b985e3 Bug#16119355:PREPARED STATEMENT: READ OF FREED MEMORY WITH STRING CONVERSION FUNCTIONS
Reverting fix for Bug#16119355 in 5.1 as this needs two patches 
from 5.5+ to work for a certain case
2013-05-10 19:18:21 +05:30
Jon Olav Hauglid
4f858dcd0c Bug#16779374: NEW ERROR MESSAGE ADDED TO 5.5 AFTER 5.6 GA - REUSING
NUMBER ALREADY USED BY 5.6

The problem was that the patch for Bug#13004581 added a new error
message to 5.5. This causes it to use an error number already used
in 5.6 by ER_CANNOT_LOAD_FROM_TABLE_V2. Which means that error
message number stability between GA releases is broken.

This patch fixes the problem by removing the error message and
using ER_UNKNOWN_ERROR instead.
2013-05-08 12:52:12 +02:00
Chaithra Gopalareddy
ff55c9da68 Merge from 5.1 to 5.5 2013-05-07 18:00:00 +05:30
Chaithra Gopalareddy
12a26cd6e0 Bug #16119355: PREPARED STATEMENT: READ OF FREED MEMORY WITH
STRING CONVERSION FUNCTIONS
            
Problem:
While executing the prepared statement, user variable is
set to memory which would be freed at the end of
execution.
If the statement is executed again, valgrind throws
error when accessing this pointer.
            
Analysis:
            
1. First time when Item_func_set_user_var::check is called,
memory is allocated for "value" to store the result.
(In the call to copy_if_not_alloced).
2. While sending the result, Item_func_set_user_var::check
is called again. But, this time, its called with
"use_result_field" set to true. 
As a result, we call result_field->val_str(&value).
3. Here memory allocated for "value" gets freed. And "value"
gets set to "result_field", with "str_length" being that of
result_field's.
4. In the call to JOIN::cleanup, result_field's memory gets
freed as this is allocated in a chunk as part of the
temporary table which is needed to execute the query.
5. Next time, when execute of the same statement is called,
"value" will be set to memory which is already freed.
Valgrind error occurs as "str_length" is positive 
(set at Step 3)
            
Note that user variables list is stored as part of the Lex object
in set_var_list. Hence the persistance across executions.
      
Solution:
Patch for Bug#11764371 fixed in mysql-5.6+ fixes this problem 
as well.So backporting the same.
      
In the solution for Bug#11764371, we create another object of 
user_var and repoint it to temp_table's field. As a result while 
deleting the alloced buffer in Step 3, since the cloned object 
does not own the buffer, deletion will not happen.
So at step 5 when we execute the statement second time, the 
original object will be used and since deletion did not happen 
valgrind will not complain about dangling pointer.
2013-05-07 16:08:48 +05:30
Sergey Glukhov
1414a0ed7f 5.1 -> 5.5 merge 2013-05-07 13:14:01 +04:00
Sergey Glukhov
a250331593 Bug#16095534 CRASH: PREPARED STATEMENT CRASHES IN ITEM_BOOL_FUNC2::FIX_LENGTH_AND_DEC
The problem happened due to broken left expression in Item_in_optimizer object.
In case of the bug left expression is runtime created Item_outer_ref item which
is deleted at the end of the statement and one of Item_in_optimizer arguments
becomes bad when re-executed. The fix is to use real_item() instead of original
left expression. Note: It feels a bit weird that after preparing, the field is
directly part of the generated Item_func_eq, whereas in execution it is replaced
with an Item_outer_ref wrapper object.
2013-05-07 13:10:58 +04:00
Jon Olav Hauglid
db99fd7450 Bug#16757869: INNODB: POSSIBLE REGRESSION IN 5.5.31, BUG#16004999
The problem was that if UPDATE with subselect caused a
deadlock inside InnoDB, this deadlock was not properly
handled by the SQL layer. This meant that the SQL layer
would try to unlock the row after InnoDB had rolled
back the transaction. This caused an assertion inside
InnoDB.
  
This patch fixes the problem by checking for errors
reported by SQL_SELECT::skip_record() and not calling
unlock_row() if any errors have been reported.

This bug is similar to Bug#13586591, but for UPDATE
rather than DELETE. Similar issues in filesort/opt_range/
sql_select will be investigated and handled in the scope
of Bug#16767929
2013-05-06 15:01:57 +02:00
Neeraj Bisht
84421e8e6c BUG#16222245 - CRASH WITH EXPLAIN FOR A QUERY WITH LOOSE SCAN FOR
GROUP BY, MYISAM 

Merge fix for Bug#16222245 from mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5
2013-04-30 22:46:37 +05:30
Neeraj Bisht
ed694b0c09 BUG#16222245 - CRASH WITH EXPLAIN FOR A QUERY WITH LOOSE SCAN FOR
GROUP BY, MYISAM 

Problem:-
In a query, where we are using loose index scan optimization and 
we have MIN() causes segmentation fault(where table row length 
is less then key_length).

Analysis:

While using loose index scan for MIN(), we call key_copy(), to copy 
the key data from record.
This function is using temporary record buffer to store key data 
from the record buffer.But in case where the key length is greater 
then the buffer length, this will cause a segmentation fault.


Solution:
Give a proper buffer to store a key record.
2013-04-30 22:38:34 +05:30
Bill Qu
0424897cff Bug #13004581 BLACKHOLE BINARY LOG WITH ROW IGNORES UPDATE AND DELETE STATEMENTS
When logging to the binary log in row, updates and deletes to a BLACKHOLE
engine table are skipped.
  
It is impossible to log binary log in row format for updates and deletes to
a BLACKHOLE engine table, as no row events can be generated in these cases.
After fix, generate a warning for UPDATE/DELETE statements that modify a
BLACKHOLE table, as row events are not logged in row format.
2013-04-27 16:04:54 +08:00
Neeraj Bisht
bae6667d86 Bug#16073689 : CRASH IN ITEM_FUNC_MATCH::INIT_SEARCH
Problem:
In query like
select 1 from .. order by match .. against ...;
causes a debug assert failue.

Analysis:
In union type query like

(select * from order by a) order by b;
or
(select * from order by a) union (select * from order by b);

We skip resolving of order by a for 1st query and order by of a and b in 
2nd query.


This means that, in case when our order by have Item_func_match class, 
we skip resolving it.
But we maintain a ft_func_list and at the time of optimization, when we 
Perform FULLTEXT search before all regular searches on the bases of the 
list we call Item_func_match::init_search() which will cause debug assert 
as the item is not resolved.


Solution:
We will skip execution if the item is not fixed and we will not 
fix index(Item_func_match::fix_index()) for which 
Item_func_match::fix_field() is not called so that on later changes 
we can check the dependency on fix field.
bz
2013-04-20 12:36:11 +05:30
Neeraj Bisht
c066c30822 Bug#16073689 : CRASH IN ITEM_FUNC_MATCH::INIT_SEARCH
Problem:
In query like
select 1 from .. order by match .. against ...;
causes a debug assert failue.

Analysis:
In union type query like

(select * from order by a) order by b;
or
(select * from order by a) union (select * from order by b);

We skip resolving of order by a for 1st query and order by of a and b in 
2nd query.


This means that, in case when our order by have Item_func_match class, 
we skip resolving it.
But we maintain a ft_func_list and at the time of optimization, when we 
Perform FULLTEXT search before all regular searches on the bases of the 
list we call Item_func_match::init_search() which will cause debug assert 
as the item is not resolved.


Solution:
We will skip execution if the item is not fixed and we will not 
fix index(Item_func_match::fix_index()) for which 
Item_func_match::fix_field() is not called so that on later changes 
we can check the dependency on fix field.
2013-04-20 12:28:22 +05:30