"relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against `handler_index_cond_check' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC"
don't use visibility=hidden for external functions
"safe exception patch".
Remove misleading comments suggesting about signal() Windows, the routine here
is part of a exception handler, and sig parameter is an exception code.
- In mi_rkey(), do correct handling of case where mi_yield_and_check_if_killed()
detects that the thread was killed (all other similar functions in MyISAM/Aria have
slightly different code and do not have this problem).
- Also fixed assignment in DBUG_ASSERT
- this is 2nd variant of the fix:
= make .result file smaller
= run KILLable statements in a separate connection, otherwise we could end up trying to
KILL the final "DROP TABLE" statement
Fixed README with link to source
Merged InnoDB change to XtraDB
README:
Added information of where to find MariaDB code
storage/archive/ha_archive.cc:
Removed memset() of rows, a MariaDB checksum's doesn't touch not used data.
This happend when you have more than 1024 open Aria tables during checkpoint.
mysql-test/mysql-test-run.pl:
Fixed that variable names are consistent between external and internal server.
mysql-test/suite/maria/suite.pm:
Test for aria-block-size instead of 'aria' as 'aria' is not set for embedded server.
This should be ok for aria tests, as aria is never disabled for these.
storage/maria/ma_checkpoint.c:
Fixed bug when there are more than 1024 open Aria tables during checkpoint.
- In return_zero_rows(), don't call mark_as_null_row() for semi-join
materialized tables, because 1) they may have been already freed, and
2)there is no real need to call mark_as_null_row() for them.
This bug is the result of an incomplete/inconsistent change introduced into
5.3 code when the cond_equal parameter were added to the function optimize_cond.
The change was made during a merge from 5.2 in October 2010.
The bug could affect only queries with HAVING.
An outer join query with a semi-join subquery could return a wrong result
if the optimizer chose to materialize the subquery.
It happened because when substituting for the best field into a ref item
used to build access keys not all COND_EQUAL objects that could be employed
at substitution were checked.
Also refined some code in the function check_join_cache_usage to make it
safer.
common icp callback in the handler.cc.
It can also increment status counters, without making the engine
dependent on the exact THD layout (that is different in embedded).
This bug led to wrong values of the use_count fields in some SEL_ARG
trees that triggered complains on the server side when executing the
test case for LP bug 800184 if a debug build of the server was used.
This was the result of the incomplete fix for bug 800184.
To complete it the following corrections had to be made:
- the copy constructor for SEL_TREE must call the new function incr_refs_all()
instead of the function incr_refs(), because references to next key parts
from any SEL_ARG tree belonging to the list of the first key part has to be
adjusted.
- the method and_sel_tree of the class SEL_IMERGE must use the copy constructor
of the SEL_TREE class to make a copy of its second argument before it ANDs it
with any SEL_TREE tree from the processed SEL_IMERGE object.
timestamp: Thu 2011-12-01 15:12:10 +0100
Fix for Bug#13430436 PERFORMANCE DEGRADATION IN SYSBENCH ON INNODB DUE TO ICP
When running sysbench on InnoDB there is a performance degradation due
to index condition pushdown (ICP). Several of the queries in sysbench
have a WHERE condition that the optimizer uses for executing these
queries as range scans. The upper and lower limit of the range scan
will ensure that the WHERE condition is fulfilled. Still, the WHERE
condition is part of the queries' condition and if ICP is enabled the
condition will be pushed down to InnoDB as an index condition.
Due to the range scan's upper and lower limits ensure that the WHERE
condition is fulfilled, the pushed index condition will not filter out
any records. As a result the use of ICP for these queries results in a
performance overhead for sysbench. This overhead comes from using
resources for determining the part of the condition that can be pushed
down to InnoDB and overhead in InnoDB for executing the pushed index
condition.
With the default configuration for sysbench the range scans will use
the primary key. This is a clustered index in InnoDB. Using ICP on a
clustered index provides the lowest performance benefit since the
entire record is part of the clustered index and in InnoDB it has the
highest relative overhead for executing the pushed index condition.
The fix for removing the overhead ICP introduces when running sysbench
is to disable use of ICP when the index used by the query is a
clustered index.
When WL#6061 is implemented this change should be re-evaluated.
Problem was that now we can merge derived table (subquery in the FROM clause).
Fix: in case of detected conflict and presence of derived table "over" the table which cased the conflict - try materialization strategy.
The replication slave sets first error 1913 and immediately after error
1595. Thus it is possible, but unlikely, to get 1913. The original test
seems to realise this, but uses an invalid error code - my guess is
that this was a temporary code used in a feature tree, which was then
forgotten to be fixed when merged to main. The removed "1923" is
something committed by mistake during tests.
If the flag 'optimize_join_buffer_size' is set to 'off' and the value
of the system variable 'join_buffer_size' is greater than the value of
the system variable 'join_buffer_space_limit' than no join cache can
be employed to join tables of the executed query.
A bug in the function JOIN_CACHE::alloc_buffer allowed to use join
buffer even in this case while another bug in the function
revise_cache_usage could cause a crash of the server in this case if the
chosen execution plan for the query contained outer join or semi-join
operation.
locked until we have finished clean up.
Previously, the code released the lock without marking that the thread
was running. This allowed a new slave thread to start while the old one
was still in the middle of cleaning up, causing assertions and probably
general mayhem.
