REVOKE/GRANT; ALTER EVENT.
The following statements support the CURRENT_USER() where a user is needed.
DROP USER
RENAME USER CURRENT_USER() ...
GRANT ... TO CURRENT_USER()
REVOKE ... FROM CURRENT_USER()
ALTER DEFINER = CURRENT_USER() EVENT
but, When these statements are binlogged, CURRENT_USER() just is binlogged
as 'CURRENT_USER()', it is not expanded to the real user name. When slave
executes the log event, 'CURRENT_USER()' is expand to the user of slave
SQL thread, but SQL thread's user name always NULL. This breaks the replication.
After this patch, All above statements are rewritten when they are binlogged.
The CURRENT_USER() is expanded to the real user's name and host.
The 'rpl_get_master_version_and_clock' test verifies if the slave I/O
thread tries to reconnect to master when it tries to get the values of
the UNIX_TIMESTAMP, SERVER_ID from master under network disconnection.
So the master server is restarted for making the transient network
disconnection, during the period the COM_REGISTER_SLAVE failures are
produced in server log file when the slave I/O thread tries to
register on master.
To fix the problem, suppress COM_REGISTER_SLAVE failures in server log
file by mtr suppression, because they are expected.
In RBR, DDL statement will change binlog format to non row-based
format before it is binlogged, but the binlog format was not be
restored, and then manipulating a temporary table can not reset binlog
format to row-based format rightly. So that the manipulated statement
is binlogged with statement-based format.
To fix the problem, restore the state of binlog format after the DDL
statement is binlogged.
cant find record
Some engines return data for the record. Despite the fact that
the null bit is set for some fields, their old value may still in
the row. This can happen when unpacking an AI from the binlog on
top of a previous record in which a field is set to NULL, which
previously contained a value. Ultimately, this may cause the
comparison of records to fail when the slave is doing an index or
range scan.
We fix this by deploying a call to reset() for each field that is
set to null while unpacking a row from the binary log.
Furthermore, we also add mixed mode test case to cover the
scenario where updating and setting a field to null through a
Query event and later searching it through a rows event will
succeed.
Finally, we also change the reset() method, from Field_bit class,
so that it takes into account bits stored among the null bits and
not only the ones stored in the record.
Resetting the master before stopping the slave was generating the message
"[ERROR] Slave I/O: Got fatal error 1236 from master when reading data from
binary log: 'could not find next log', Error_code: 1236". In consequence,
the test case was failing because the message had not been suppressed.
To circumvent the failure, we rewrote the test stopping the slave before
resetting the master. We prefer this alternative rather than suppressing
the message.
It is well-known that due to concurrency issues, a slave can become
inconsistent when a transaction contains updates to both transaction and
non-transactional tables in statement and mixed modes.
In a nutshell, the current code-base tries to preserve causality among the
statements by writing non-transactional statements to the txn-cache which
is flushed upon commit. However, modifications done to non-transactional
tables on behalf of a transaction become immediately visible to other
connections but may not immediately get into the binary log and therefore
consistency may be broken.
In general, it is impossible to automatically detect causality/dependency
among statements by just analyzing the statements sent to the server. This
happen because dependency may be hidden in the application code and it is
necessary to know a priori all the statements processed in the context of
a transaction such as in a procedure. Moreover, even for the few cases that
we could automatically address in the server, the computation effort
required could make the approach infeasible.
So, in this patch we introduce the option
- "--binlog-direct-non-transactional-updates" that can be used to bypass
the current behavior in order to write directly to binary log statements
that change non-transactional tables.
'CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS ... SELECT' statement were causing 'CREATE
TEMPORARY TABLE ...' to be written to the binary log in row-based
mode (a.k.a. RBR), when there was a temporary table with the same name.
Because the 'CREATE TABLE ... SELECT' statement was executed as
'INSERT ... SELECT' into the temporary table. Since in RBR mode no
other statements related to temporary tables are written into binary log,
this sometimes broke replication.
This patch changes behavior of 'CREATE TABLE [IF NOT EXISTS] ... SELECT ...'.
it ignores existence of temporary table with the
same name as table being created and is interpreted
as attempt to create/insert into base table. This makes behavior of
'CREATE TABLE [IF NOT EXISTS] ... SELECT' consistent with
how ordinary 'CREATE TABLE' and 'CREATE TABLE ... LIKE' behave.
Conflicts:
Text conflict in .bzr-mysql/default.conf
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_loaddata_fatal.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_stm_log.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/t/mysqlbinlog.test
Text conflict in sql/sql_acl.cc
Text conflict in sql/sql_servers.cc
Text conflict in sql/sql_update.cc
Text conflict in support-files/mysql.spec.sh
Problem: The test case failed because: (i) warning text in
result file differed from the warning output by the
server, and (ii) binlog contents in result file did
not show the statements logged wrapped in BEGIN/COMMIT
as it is the case after WL 2687.
Solution: We update the result file, but first we change the
unsafe warning text to also refer to performance_schema
table(s). This required changing the result files for
existing test cases that provide output for warnings
related to ER_BINLOG_UNSAFE_SYSTEM_TABLE. "Grepping" in
result files, shows that only binlog_unsafe contained
reference to such a warning.
We also update the result file with the missing
BEGIN/COMMIT statements.
BUG#49481: RBR: MyISAM and bit fields may cause slave to stop on delete:
cant find record
BUG#49482: RBR: Replication may break on deletes when MyISAM tables +
char field are used
When using MyISAM tables, despite the fact that the null bit is
set for some fields, their old value is still in the row. This
can cause the comparison of records to fail when the slave is
doing an index or range scan.
We fix this by avoiding memcmp for MyISAM tables when comparing
records. Additionally, when comparing field by field, we first
check if both fields are not null and if so, then we compare
them. If just one field is null we return failure immediately. If
both fields are null, we move on to the next field.
Problem: When RAND() is binlogged in statement mode, the seed is
binlogged too, so the replication slave generates the same
sequence of random numbers. This makes replication work in many
cases, but not in all cases: the order of rows is not guaranteed
for, e.g., UPDATE or INSERT...SELECT statements, so the row data
will be different if master and slave retrieve the rows in
different orders.
Fix: Mark RAND() as unsafe. It will generate a warning if
binlog_format=STATEMENT and switch to row-logging if
binlog_format=ROW.
- mysqld--help-win
Updated result so that it contains missing
value for slave-type-conversions
- rpl_idempotency
This seems a bad merge. In BUG#39934, the contents of
this file had been split into rpl_row_idempontency and
rpl_idempotency. The patch was pushed to 5.1-rep+3 which
was later merged in rep+2-delivery1 which in turn was
merged in 5.1-rpl-merge. Now while merging next-mr in
5.1-rpl-merge, the file got back it's old content (which
is in rpl_row_idempotency now because of BUG#39934). This
cset reverts the bad merge:
bzr merge -r revid:dao-gang.qu@sun.com-20100112120709-ioxp11yl9bvquaqd..\
before:revid:dao-gang.qu@sun.com-20100112120709-ioxp11yl9bvquaqd\
suite/rpl/t/rpl_idempotency.test
