Problem: Many test cases don't clean up after themselves (fail
to drop tables or fail to reset variables). This implies that:
(1) check-testcase in the new mtr that currently lives in
5.1-rpl failed. (2) it may cause unexpected results in
subsequent tests.
Fix: make all tests clean up.
Also: cleaned away unnecessary output in rpl_packet.result
Also: fixed bug where rpl_log called RESET MASTER with a running
slave. This is not supposed to work.
Also: removed unnecessary code from rpl_stm_EE_err2 and made it
verify that an error occurred.
Also: removed unnecessary code from rpl_ndb_ctype_ucs2_def.
Problem: during a refactoring of mtr, a pattern for suppressing a warning from lowercase_table3 was lost.
Fix: re-introduce the suppression.
Problem 2: suppression was misspelt as supression. Fixed by adding a p.
without PK
Bug#31609 Not all RBR slave errors reported as errors
bug#32468 delete rows event on a table with foreign key constraint fails
The first two bugs comprise idempotency issues.
First, there was no error code reported under conditions of the bug
description although the slave sql thread halted.
Second, executions were different with and without presence of prim key in
the table.
Third, there was no way to instruct the slave whether to ignore an error
and skip to the following event or to halt.
Fourth, there are handler errors which might happen due to idempotent
applying of binlog but those were not listed among the "idempotent" error
list.
All the named issues are addressed.
Wrt to the 3rd, there is the new global system variable, changeble at run
time, which controls the slave sql thread behaviour.
The new variable allows further extensions to mimic the sql_mode
session/global variable.
To address the 4th, the new bug#32468 had to be fixed as it was staying
in the way.
The rpl_trigger test case indicated a problem with idempotency support when run
under row-based replication, which this patch fixes.
However, despite this, the test is not designed for execution under row-based
replication and hence rpl_trigger.test is not executed under row-based
replication.
The problem is that the test expects triggers to be executed when the slave
updates rows on the slave, and this is (deliberately) not done with row-based
replication.
