An "ITERATE innerLoop" did not work properly inside
a WHILE loop, which itself is inside an outer FOR loop:
outerLoop:
FOR
...
innerLoop:
WHILE
...
ITERATE innerLoop;
...
END WHILE;
...
END FOR;
It erroneously generated an integer increment code for the outer FOR loop.
There were two problems:
1. "ITERATE innerLoop" worked like "ITERATE outerLoop"
2. It was always integer increment, even in case of FOR cursor loops.
Background:
- A FOR loop automatically creates a dedicated sp_pcontext stack entry,
to put the iteration and bound variables on it.
- Other loop types (LOOP, WHILE, REPEAT), do not generate a dedicated
slack entry.
The old code erroneously assumed that sp_pcontext::m_for_loop
either describes the most inner loop (in case the inner loop is FOR),
or is empty (in case the inner loop is not FOR).
But in fact, sp_pcontext::m_for_loop is never empty inside a FOR loop:
it describes the closest FOR loop, even if this FOR loop has nested
non-FOR loops inside.
So when we're near the ITERATE statement in the above script,
sp_pcontext::m_for_loop is not empty - it stores information about
the FOR loop labeled as "outrLoop:".
Fix:
- Adding a new member sp_pcontext::Lex_for_loop::m_start_label,
to remember the explicit or the auto-generated label correspoding
to the start of the FOR body. It's used during generation
of "ITERATE loop_label" code to check if "loop_label" belongs
to the current FOR loop pointed by sp_pcontext::m_for_loop,
or belongs to a non-FOR nested loop.
- Adding LEX methods sp_for_loop_intrange_iterate() and
sp_for_loop_cursor_iterate() to reuse the code between
methods handling:
* ITERATE
* END FOR
- Adding a test for Lex_for_loop::is_for_loop_cursor()
and generate a code either a cursor fetch, or for an integer increment.
Before this change, it always erroneously generated an integer increment
version.
- Cleanup: Initialize Lex_for_loop_st::m_cursor_offset inside
Lex_for_loop_st::init(), to avoid not initialized members.
- Cleanup: Removing a redundant method:
Lex_for_loop_st::init(const Lex_for_loop_st &other)
Using Lex_for_loop_st::operator(const Lex_for_loop_st &other) instead.
The print() function was missing from the FETCH GROUP NEXT ROW instrunction class, so there was no
output for this particular instruction when we use the query SHOW FUNCTION CODE function_name
