Commit graph

607 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
ramil/ram@mysql.com/ramil.myoffice.izhnet.ru
51ca3235b8 Fix for bug #32560: crash with interval function and count(*)
Problem: INTERVAL function implementation doesn't handle NULL range values.

Fix: skip NULL ranges looking for a proper one.
2007-11-23 16:30:06 +04:00
gshchepa/uchum@gleb.loc
e5394523d3 Merge gleb.loc:/home/uchum/work/bk/5.0-opt-28076
into  gleb.loc:/home/uchum/work/bk/5.0-opt
2007-11-10 23:58:22 +04:00
gshchepa/uchum@gleb.loc
0aabb89ee1 Fixed bug #28076: inconsistent binary/varbinary comparison.
After adding an index the <VARBINARY> IN (SELECT <BINARY> ...)
clause returned a wrong result: the VARBINARY value was illegally padded
with zero bytes to the length of the BINARY column for the index search.
(<VARBINARY>, ...) IN (SELECT <BINARY>, ... ) clauses are affected too.
2007-11-10 23:44:48 +04:00
tnurnberg@mysql.com/white.intern.koehntopp.de
dd7452c280 Bug#31800: Date comparison fails with timezone and slashes for greater than comparison
BETWEEN was more lenient with regard to what it accepted as a DATE/DATETIME
in comparisons than greater-than and less-than were. ChangeSet makes < >
comparisons similarly robust with regard to trailing garbage (" GMT-1")
and "missing" leading zeros. Now all three comparators behave similarly
in that they throw a warning for "junk" at the end of the data, but then
proceed anyway if possible. Before < > fell back on a string- (rather than
date-) comparison when a warning-condition was raised in the string-to-date
conversion. Now the fallback only happens on actual errors, while warning-
conditions still result in a warning being to delivered to the client.
2007-11-10 13:33:42 +01:00
gkodinov/kgeorge@magare.gmz
737dd70435 Merge gkodinov@bk-internal.mysql.com:/home/bk/mysql-5.0-opt
into  magare.gmz:/home/kgeorge/mysql/autopush/B31440-5.0-opt
2007-10-13 09:12:15 +03:00
gkodinov/kgeorge@magare.gmz
99f1606e94 Bug #31440: 'select 1 regex null' asserts debug server
The special case with NULL as a regular expression
was handled at prepare time. But in this special case
the item was not marked as fixed. This caused an assertion
at execution time.
Fixed my marking the item as fixed even when known to 
return NULL at prepare time.
2007-10-11 11:29:26 +03:00
gshchepa/uchum@gleb.loc
356007a8a4 Fixed bug #31471: decimal_bin_size: Assertion `scale >= 0 &&
precision > 0 && scale <= precision'.

A sign of a resulting item of the IFNULL function was not
updated and the maximal length of this result was calculated
improperly. Correct algorithm was copy&pasted from the IF
function implementation.
2007-10-10 20:14:29 +05:00
evgen@sunlight.local
36bf417b40 Bug#27216: functions with parameters of different date types may return wrong
type of the result.

There are several functions that accept parameters of different types.
The result field type of such functions was determined based on
the aggregated result type of its arguments. As the DATE and the DATETIME
types are represented by the STRING type, the result field type
of the affected functions was always STRING for DATE/DATETIME arguments.
The affected functions are COALESCE, IF, IFNULL, CASE, LEAST/GREATEST, CASE.

Now the affected functions aggregate the field types of their arguments rather
than their result types and return the result of aggregation as their result
field type.
The cached_field_type member variable is added to the number of classes to
hold the aggregated result field type.
The str_to_date() function's result field type now defaults to the
MYSQL_TYPE_DATETIME.
The agg_field_type() function is added. It aggregates field types with help
of the Field::field_type_merge() function.
The create_table_from_items() function now uses the 
item->tmp_table_field_from_field_type() function to get the proper field
when the item is a function with a STRING result type.
2007-09-22 11:49:27 +04:00
evgen@moonbone.local
17654758a4 item_cmpfunc.cc:
A typo fixed.
2007-07-16 01:03:58 +04:00
evgen@moonbone.local
49db78b382 item_cmpfunc.cc:
Fixed compiler warning.
2007-07-16 00:59:47 +04:00
evgen@moonbone.local
9dc929f2b4 item_cmpfunc.cc:
A comment changed.
2007-07-15 23:40:57 +04:00
evgen@moonbone.local
975d22327e Extended fix for the bug#29555.
The get_time_value function is added. It is used to obtain TIME values both
from items the can return time as an integer and from items that can return
time only as a string.
The Arg_comparator::compare_datetime function now uses pointer to a getter
function to obtain values to compare. Now this function is also used for
comparison of TIME values.
The get_value_func variable is added to the Arg_comparator class.
It points to a getter function for the DATE/DATETIME/TIME comparator.
2007-07-15 21:51:36 +04:00
evgen@moonbone.local
1b1464ba30 Bug#29739: Incorrect time comparison in BETWEEN.
Time values were compared by the BETWEEN function as strings. This led to a
wrong result in cases when some of arguments are less than 100 hours and other
are greater.

Now if all 3 arguments of the BETWEEN function are of the TIME type then
they are compared as integers.
2007-07-12 23:09:55 +04:00
evgen@moonbone.local
df9c376e72 Bug#29555: Comparing time values as strings may lead to a wrong result.
Time values were compared as strings. This led to a wrong comparison
result when comparing values one of which is under 100 hours and another is
over 100 hours.

Now when the Arg_comparator::set_cmp_func function sees that both items to
compare are of the TIME type it sets the comparator to the
Arg_comparator::compare_e_int or the Arg_comparator::compare_int_unsigned
functions.
2007-07-11 23:18:02 +04:00
holyfoot/hf@hfmain.(none)
8ccc50b303 Merge bk@192.168.21.1:mysql-5.0
into  mysql.com:/d2/hf/mrg/mysql-5.0-opt
2007-06-14 16:41:10 +05:00
tsmith@quadxeon.mysql.com
d2fe24d1ef Merge tsmith@bk-internal.mysql.com:/home/bk/mysql-5.0
into  quadxeon.mysql.com:/benchmarks/ext3/TOSAVE/tsmith/bk/maint/jun05/50
2007-06-05 23:04:40 +02:00
evgen@moonbone.local
0a91c7ccca Bug#28778: Wrong result of BETWEEN when comparing a DATETIME field with an
integer constants.

This bug is introduced by the fix for bug#16377. Before the fix the 
Item_func_between::fix_length_and_dec method converted the second and third
arguments to the type of the first argument if they were constant and the first
argument is of the DATE/DATETIME type. That approach worked well for integer
constants and sometimes produced bad result for string constants. The fix for
the bug#16377 wrongly removed that code at all and as a result of this the
comparison of a DATETIME field and an integer constant was carried out in a
wrong way and sometimes led to wrong result sets.

Now the Item_func_between::fix_length_and_dec method converts the second and
third arguments to the type of the first argument if they are constant, the
first argument is of the DATE/DATETIME type and the DATETIME comparator isn't
applicable.
2007-06-06 00:25:06 +04:00
kaa@polly.local
d30872b4b2 Got rid of log_01[], because we don't really need it. Division and log_10[] can always be used instead, which is also a more precise way.
This is for bug #28121.
2007-05-30 22:47:52 +04:00
evgen@moonbone.local
268fdf5db3 Bug#28450: The Item_date_add_interval in select list may fail the field
type assertion.

The bug was introduced by the patch for bug #16377.
The "+ INTERVAL" (Item_date_add_interval) function detects its result type
by the type of its first argument. But in some cases it returns STRING
as the result type. This happens when, for example, the first argument is a 
DATE represented as string. All this makes the get_datetime_value()
function misinterpret such result and return wrong DATE/DATETIME value.
To avoid such cases in the fix for #16377 the code that detects correct result
field type on the first execution was added to the
Item_date_add_interval::get_date() function. Due to this the result
field type of the Item_date_add_interval item stored by the send_fields()
function differs from item's result field type at the moment when
the item is actually sent. It causes an assertion failure.

Now the get_datetime_value() detects that the DATE value is returned by
some item not only by checking the result field type but also by comparing
the returned value with the 100000000L constant - any DATE value should be
less than this value.
Removed result field type adjusting code from the
Item_date_add_interval::get_date() function.
2007-05-30 00:33:12 +04:00
kaa@polly.local
84c81bd534 Merge polly.local:/home/kaa/src/maint/bug28121/my50-bug28121
into  polly.local:/home/kaa/src/maint/mysql-5.0-maint
2007-05-28 14:34:36 +04:00
kaa@polly.local
8ac1ffdf1d Fix for bug #28121 "INSERT or UPDATE into DOUBLE(200,0) field being truncated to 31 digits"
When storing a large number to a FLOAT or DOUBLE field with fixed length, it could be incorrectly truncated if the field's length was greater than 31.

This patch also does some code cleanups to be able to reuse code which is common between Field_float::store() and Field_double::store().
2007-05-28 12:44:59 +04:00
tsmith@quadxeon.mysql.com
99488b31b9 Merge quadxeon.mysql.com:/benchmarks/ext3/TOSAVE/tsmith/bk/50
into  quadxeon.mysql.com:/benchmarks/ext3/TOSAVE/tsmith/bk/maint/50
2007-05-21 20:50:08 +02:00
tsmith@siva.hindu.god
30bc713c77 Merge siva.hindu.god:/home/tsmith/m/bk/50
into  siva.hindu.god:/home/tsmith/m/bk/maint/50
2007-05-17 14:17:50 -06:00
evgen@moonbone.local
0e3c4f6729 Bug#28261: Wrong DATETIME comparison result when the GET_USER_VAR function
is involved.

The Arg_comparator::compare_datetime() comparator caches its arguments if
they are constants i.e. const_item() returns true. The
Item_func_get_user_var::const_item() returns true or false based on
the current query_id and the query_id where the variable was created.
Thus even if a query can change its value its const_item() still will return
true. All this leads to a wrong comparison result when an object of the
Item_func_get_user_var class is involved.

Now the Arg_comparator::can_compare_as_dates() and the
get_datetime_value() functions never cache result of the GET_USER_VAR()
function (the Item_func_get_user_var class).
2007-05-17 23:09:45 +04:00
msvensson@pilot.blaudden
a65d12a830 Backport of TIME->MYSQL_TIME / Y2K fixset
Made year 2000 handling more uniform
Removed year 2000 handling out from calc_days()
The above removes some bugs in date/datetimes with year between 0 and 200
Now we get a note when we insert a datetime value into a date column
For default values to CREATE, don't give errors for warning level NOTE
Fixed some compiler failures
Added library ws2_32 for windows compilation (needed if we want to compile with IOCP support)
Removed duplicate typedef TIME and replaced it with MYSQL_TIME

Better (more complete) fix for: Bug#21103 "DATE column not compared as DATE"
Fixed properly Bug#18997 "DATE_ADD and DATE_SUB perform year2K autoconversion magic on 4-digit year value"
Fixed Bug#23093 "Implicit conversion of 9912101 to date does not match cast(9912101 as date)"
2007-05-16 10:44:59 +02:00
evgen@moonbone.local
fbb2332628 Bug#28208: Wrong result of a non-const STRING function with a const DATETIME
function.

A wrong  condition was used to check that the
Arg_comparator::can_compare_as_dates() function calculated the value of the
string constant. When comparing a non-const STRING function with a constant
DATETIME function it leads to saving an arbitrary value as a cached value of
the DATETIME function.

Now the Arg_comparator::set_cmp_func() function initializes the const_value
variable to the impossible DATETIME value (-1) and this const_value is
cached only if it was changed by the Arg_comparator::can_compare_as_dates()
function.
2007-05-16 00:30:12 +04:00
evgen@moonbone.local
6ec0bc24a7 Merge epotemkin@bk-internal.mysql.com:/home/bk/mysql-5.0-opt
into  moonbone.local:/mnt/gentoo64/work/28133-bug-5.0-opt-mysql
2007-05-07 22:22:51 +04:00
evgen@moonbone.local
7d473a1a37 Bug#28133: Wrong DATE/DATETIME comparison in IN() function.
The IN function was comparing DATE/DATETIME values either as ints or as
strings. Both methods have their disadvantages and may lead to a wrong
result.

Now IN function checks whether all of its arguments has the STRING result
types and at least one of them is a DATE/DATETIME item. If so it uses either
an object of the in_datetime class or an object of the cmp_item_datetime
class to perform its work. If the IN() function arguments are rows then
row columns are checked whether the DATE/DATETIME comparator should be used
to compare them.
The in_datetime class is used to find occurence of the item to be checked
in the vector of the constant DATE/DATETIME values. The cmp_item_datetime
class is used to compare items one by one in the DATE/DATETIME context.
Both classes obtain values from items with help of the get_datetime_value()
function and cache the left item if it is a constant one.
2007-05-07 22:20:43 +04:00
evgen@moonbone.local
239f727b7e Bug#27759: Wrong DATE/DATETIME comparison in LEAST()/GREATEST() functions.
The LEAST/GREATEST functions compared DATE/DATETIME values as
strings which in some cases could lead to a wrong result.

A new member function called cmp_datetimes() is added to the
Item_func_min_max class. It compares arguments in DATETIME context
and returns index of the least/greatest argument.
The Item_func_min_max::fix_length_and_dec() function now detects when
arguments should be compared in DATETIME context and sets the newly
added flag compare_as_dates. It indicates that the cmp_datetimes() function
should be called to get a correct result.
Item_func_min_max::val_xxx() methods are corrected to call the
cmp_datetimes() function when needed.
Objects of the Item_splocal class now stores and reports correct original
field type.
2007-05-04 18:57:10 +04:00
holyfoot/hf@mysql.com/hfmain.(none)
e2f6bd86b4 Merge bk@192.168.21.1:mysql-5.0
into  mysql.com:/d2/hf/mrg/mysql-5.0-opt
2007-04-29 18:42:50 +05:00
evgen@sunlight.local
4b5c387f5d Additional fix for the bug#27590. 2007-04-28 00:04:50 +04:00
evgen@moonbone.local
7a1c61efb6 Bug#16377: Wrong DATE/DATETIME comparison in BETWEEN function.
The BETWEEN function was comparing DATE/DATETIME values either as ints or as
strings. Both methods have their disadvantages and may lead to a wrong
result.

Now BETWEEN function checks whether all of its arguments has the STRING result
types and at least one of them is a DATE/DATETIME item. If so it sets up
two Arg_comparator obects to compare with the compare_datetime() comparator
and uses them to compare such items.

Added two Arg_comparator object members and one flag to the
Item_func_between class for the correct DATE/DATETIME comparison.
The Item_func_between::fix_length_and_dec() function now detects whether
it's used for DATE/DATETIME comparison and sets up newly added Arg_comparator
objects to do this.
The Item_func_between::val_int() now uses Arg_comparator objects to perform
correct DATE/DATETIME comparison.
The owner variable of the Arg_comparator class now can be set to NULL if the
caller wants to handle NULL values by itself.
Now the Item_date_add_interval::get_date() function ajusts cached_field type according to the detected type.
2007-04-27 00:40:35 +04:00
evgen@moonbone.local
84c47ae08f Merge moonbone.local:/mnt/gentoo64/work/27590-bug-5.0-opt-mysql
into  moonbone.local:/mnt/gentoo64/work/16377-bug-5.0-opt-mysql
2007-04-27 00:13:13 +04:00
evgen@moonbone.local
4747fa0c03 Bug#27590: Wrong DATE/DATETIME comparison.
DATE and DATETIME can be compared either as strings or as int. Both
methods have their disadvantages. Strings can contain valid DATETIME value
but have insignificant zeros omitted thus became non-comparable with
other DATETIME strings. The comparison as int usually will require conversion
from the string representation and the automatic conversion in most cases is
carried out in a wrong way thus producing wrong comparison result. Another
problem occurs when one tries to compare DATE field with a DATETIME constant.
The constant is converted to DATE losing its precision i.e. losing time part.

This fix addresses the problems described above by adding a special
DATE/DATETIME comparator. The comparator correctly converts DATE/DATETIME
string values to int when it's necessary, adds zero time part (00:00:00)
to DATE values to compare them correctly to DATETIME values. Due to correct
conversion malformed DATETIME string values are correctly compared to other
DATE/DATETIME values.

As of this patch a DATE value equals to DATETIME value with zero time part.
For example '2001-01-01' equals to '2001-01-01 00:00:00'.

The compare_datetime() function is added to the Arg_comparator class.
It implements the correct comparator for DATE/DATETIME values.
Two supplementary functions called get_date_from_str() and get_datetime_value()
are added. The first one extracts DATE/DATETIME value from a string and the
second one retrieves the correct DATE/DATETIME value from an item.
The new Arg_comparator::can_compare_as_dates() function is added and used
to check whether two given items can be compared by the compare_datetime()
comparator.
Two caching variables were added to the Arg_comparator class to speedup the
DATE/DATETIME comparison.
One more store() method was added to the Item_cache_int class to cache int
values.
The new is_datetime() function was added to the Item class. It indicates
whether the item returns a DATE/DATETIME value.
2007-04-27 00:12:09 +04:00
msvensson@pilot.blaudden
dcd914e24e Merge pilot.blaudden:/home/msvensson/mysql/mysql-5.0
into  pilot.blaudden:/home/msvensson/mysql/mysql-5.0-maint
2007-04-23 16:22:01 +02:00
ibabaev@bk-internal.mysql.com
c09d1cfe92 Merge bk-internal.mysql.com:/data0/bk/mysql-5.0
into  bk-internal.mysql.com:/data0/bk/mysql-5.0-opt
2007-04-21 00:36:21 +02:00
gshchepa/uchum@gshchepa.loc
4fcf1316bb Merge gshchepa.loc:/home/uchum/work/bk-trees/mysql-4.1-opt-27704
into  gshchepa.loc:/home/uchum/work/bk-trees/mysql-5.0-opt-27704
2007-04-20 15:31:33 +05:00
gshchepa/uchum@gshchepa.loc
f5a229b3d1 Bug#27704: incorrect comparison of rows with NULL components
Support for NULL components was incomplete for row comparison,
fixed.  Added support for abort_on_null at compare_row() like
in 5.x
2007-04-20 15:14:09 +05:00
ramil/ram@mysql.com/ramil.myoffice.izhnet.ru
bc1805891c Merge mysql.com:/home/ram/work/mysql-5.0-maint
into  mysql.com:/home/ram/work/b22824/my50-b22824
2007-04-19 12:32:38 +05:00
jamppa@bk-internal.mysql.com
82e4afb89f Merge bk-internal.mysql.com:/data0/bk/mysql-5.0
into  bk-internal.mysql.com:/data0/bk/mysql-5.0-marvel
2007-04-17 15:52:03 +02:00
jani@ua141d10.elisa.omakaista.fi
335153121b Merge jamppa@bk-internal.mysql.com:/home/bk/mysql-5.0
into  ua141d10.elisa.omakaista.fi:/home/my/bk/mysql-5.0-marvel
2007-04-12 12:50:02 +03:00
igor@olga.mysql.com
e1efba0225 Post-merge fix. 2007-04-11 12:45:27 -07:00
igor@olga.mysql.com
3b990d2cf4 Merge olga.mysql.com:/home/igor/dev-opt/mysql-4.1-opt-bug27484
into  olga.mysql.com:/home/igor/mysql-5.0-opt
2007-04-11 11:57:40 -07:00
igor@olga.mysql.com
520b144007 Fixed bug #27484: a crash when incompatible row expressions with nested rows
are used as arguments of the IN predicate.
Added a function to check compatibility of row expressions. Made sure that this
function to be called for Item_func_in objects by fix_length_and_dec().
2007-04-11 11:41:12 -07:00
igor@olga.mysql.com
6aa599fc31 Merge olga.mysql.com:/home/igor/mysql-4.1-opt
into  olga.mysql.com:/home/igor/mysql-5.0-opt
2007-04-03 16:11:27 -07:00
igor@olga.mysql.com
90aa05d276 Fixed bug #27532: wrong results with ORDER/GROUP BY queries containing
IN/BETWEEN predicates in sorting expressions.
Wrong results may occur when the select list contains an expression
with IN/BETWEEN predicate that differs from a sorting expression by
an additional NOT only.
 
Added the method Item_func_opt_neg::eq to compare correctly expressions
containing [NOT] IN/BETWEEN.
The eq method inherited from the Item_func returns TRUE when comparing
'a IN (1,2)' with 'a NOT IN (1,2)' that is not, of course, correct.
2007-04-03 14:32:16 -07:00
jani@ua141d10.elisa.omakaista.fi
3c3b0391f8 Merge ua141d10.elisa.omakaista.fi:/home/my/bk/mysql-4.1-main
into  ua141d10.elisa.omakaista.fi:/home/my/bk/mysql-5.0-marvel
2007-03-28 20:46:42 +03:00
holyfoot/hf@mysql.com/hfmain.(none)
0102d38ef4 Merge bk@192.168.21.1:mysql-5.0
into  mysql.com:/home/hf/work/mrg/mysql-5.0-opt
2007-03-22 23:48:39 +04:00
jani@ua141d10.elisa.omakaista.fi
5c542a4656 Fixed compiler warnings. 2007-03-22 20:32:07 +02:00
igor@olga.mysql.com
03ae298ec3 Fixed bug #27362: crash at evaluation of IN predicate when one
of its argument happened to be a decimal expression returning
the NULL value.
The crash was due to the fact the function in_decimal::set did
not take into account that val_decimal() could return 0 if 
the decimal expression had been evaluated to NULL.
2007-03-22 00:05:36 -07:00