The actual Bug#11754376 does not exist in MySQL 5.5 because at startup
we drop entries for temporary tables from InnoDB dictionary cache (only
if ROW_FORMAT is not REDUNDANT). But nevertheless the bug in
normalize_table_name_low() is present so we fix it.
GRACEFUL SHUTDOWN
During startup mysql picks up .frm files from the tmpdir directory and
tries to drop those tables in the storage engine.
The problem is that when tmpdir ends in / then ha_innobase::delete_table()
is passed a string like "/var/tmp//#sql123", then it wrongly normalizes it
to "/#sql123" and calls row_drop_table_for_mysql() which of course fails
to delete the table entry from the InnoDB dictionary cache.
ha_innobase::delete_table() returns an error but nevertheless mysql wipes
away the .frm file and the entry in the InnoDB dictionary cache remains
orphaned with no easy way to remove it.
The "no easy" way to remove it is to create a similar temporary table again,
copy its .frm file to tmpdir under "#sql123.frm" and restart mysqld with
tmpdir=/var/tmp (no trailing slash) - this way mysql will pick the .frm file
after restart and will try to issue drop table for "/var/tmp/#sql123"
(notice do double slash), ha_innobase::delete_table() will normalize it to
"tmp/#sql123" and row_drop_table_for_mysql() will successfully remove the
table entry from the dictionary cache.
The solution is to fix normalize_table_name_low() to normalize things like
"/var/tmp//table" correctly to "tmp/table".
This patch also adds a test function which invokes
normalize_table_name_low() with various inputs to make sure it works
correctly and a mtr test that calls this test function.
Reviewed by: Marko (http://bur03.no.oracle.com/rb/r/929/)
If we meet DB_TOO_MANY_CONCURRENT_TRXS during the execution tab_create_graph from row_create_table_for_mysql(), .ibd file for the table should be created already but was not deleted for the error handling.
rb:875 approved by Jimmy Yang
If we meet DB_TOO_MANY_CONCURRENT_TRXS during the execution tab_create_graph from row_create_table_for_mysql(), .ibd file for the table should be created already but was not deleted for the error handling.
rb:875 approved by Jimmy Yang
The counter handler_read_key (SSV::ha_read_key_count) is incremented
incorrectly.
The mysql server maintains a per thread system_status_var (SSV)
object. This object contains among other things the counter
SSV::ha_read_key_count. The purpose of this counter is to measure the
number of requests to read a row based on a key (or the number of
index lookups).
This counter was wrongly incremented in the
ha_innobase::innobase_get_index(). The fix removes
this increment statement (for both innodb and innodb_plugin).
The various callers of the innobase_get_index() was checked to
determine if anybody must increment this counter (if they first call
innobase_get_index() and then perform an index lookup). It was found
that no caller of innobase_get_index() needs to worry about the
SSV::ha_read_key_count counter.
WITH LARGE BUFFER POOL
(Note: this a backport of revno:3472 from mysql-trunk)
rb://845
approved by: Marko
When dropping a table (with an .ibd file i.e.: with
innodb_file_per_table set) we scan entire LRU to invalidate pages from
that table. This can be painful in case of large buffer pools as we hold
the buf_pool->mutex for the scan. Note that gravity of the problem does
not depend on the size of the table. Even with an empty table but a
large and filled up buffer pool we'll end up scanning a very long LRU
list.
The fix is to scan flush_list and just remove the blocks belonging to
the table from the flush_list, marking them as non-dirty. The blocks
are left in the LRU list for eventual eviction due to aging. The
flush_list is typically much smaller than the LRU list but for cases
where it is very long we have the solution of releasing the
buf_pool->mutex after scanning 1K pages.
buf_page_[set|unset]_sticky(): Use new IO-state BUF_IO_PIN to ensure
that a block stays in the flush_list and LRU list when we release
buf_pool->mutex. Previously we have been abusing BUF_IO_READ to achieve
this.
The bug was accidentally fixed by fixing
Bug#11759688 52020: InnoDB can still deadlock on just INSERT...ON DUPLICATE KEY
a.k.a. the reintroduction of
Bug#7975 deadlock without any locking, simple select and update
a.k.a. Bug#7975 deadlock without any locking, simple select and update
Bug#7975 was reintroduced when the storage engine API was made
pluggable in MySQL 5.1. Instead of looking at thd->lex directly, we
rely on handler::extra(). But, we were looking at the wrong extra()
flag, and we were ignoring the TRX_DUP_REPLACE flag in places where we
should obey it.
innodb_replace.test: Add tests for hopefully all affected statement
types, so that bug should never ever resurface. This kind of tests
should have been added when fixing Bug#7975 in MySQL 5.0.3 in the
first place.
rb:806 approved by Sunny Bains
In the ON UPDATE CASCADE clause of FOREIGN KEY constraints, the
calculated update vector was not fully initialized. This bug was
introduced in the InnoDB Plugin when implementing support for
ROW_FORMAT=DYNAMIC.
Additionally, the data type information was not initialized, but
apparently it has never been needed in this case. Nevertheless, it is
not good programming practice to pass uninitialized values around.
calc_row_difference(): Declare the update field uninitialized in
Valgrind. Copy the data type information as well, except when the
field is SQL NULL. In the built-in InnoDB, initialize
ufield->extern_storage = FALSE (an initialization bug that had gone
unnoticed this far). The InnoDB Plugin and later have this flag to
dfield_t and have always initialized it properly.
row_ins_cascade_calc_update_vec(): Reduce the scope of some
pointers. Initialize orig_len. (This caused the bug in InnoDB Plugin
and later.)
row_ins_foreign_check_on_constraint(): Simplify a condition. Declare
the update vector uninitialized.
rb:771 approved by Jimmy Yang
PARENT FOR OTHER ONE
Do not try to lookup key_nr'th key in 'table' because there may not be such
a key there. key_nr is the number of the key in the _child_ table name, not
in the parent table.
Instead just print the fields of the record that are covered by the first key
defined on the parent table.
This bug gets a better fix in MySQL 5.6, which is too risky for 5.1 and 5.5.
Approved by: Jon Olav Hauglid (via IM)
This is a redo for 5.5
Added 'innodb_file_format_max' as variable to ignore change to.
Tests that had to restore this amended
Two tests assumed it to be Antelope, make sure these run on a freshly
started server
The problem occurred when indexes are added between the time that an
UNDO record is created and the time that the purge thread comes around
and deletes the old secondary index entries. The purge thread would
hit an assert when trying to build a secondary index entry for
searching. The problem was that the old value of those fields were not
in the UNDO record since they were not part of an index when the UPDATE
occured.
A test case was added to innodb-index.test.
This fix was accidentally pushed to mysql-5.1 after the 5.1.59 clone-off in
bzr revision id marko.makela@oracle.com-20110829081642-z0w992a0mrc62s6w
with the fix of Bug#12704861 Corruption after a crash during BLOB update
but not merged to mysql-5.5 and upwards.
In the Barracuda formats, the clustered index record no longer
contains a prefix of off-page columns. Because of this, the undo log
must contain these prefixes, so that purge and multi-versioning will
continue to work. However, this also means that an undo log record can
become too big to fit in an undo log page. (It is a limitation of the
undo log that undo records cannot span across multiple pages.)
In case the checks for undo log size fail when CREATE TABLE or CREATE
INDEX is executed, we need a fallback that blocks a modification
operation when the undo log record would exceed the maximum size.
trx_undo_free_last_page_func(): Renamed from trx_undo_free_page_in_rollback().
Define the trx_t parameter only in debug builds.
trx_undo_free_last_page(): Wrapper for trx_undo_free_last_page_func().
Pass the trx_t parameter only in debug builds.
trx_undo_truncate_end_func(): Renamed from trx_undo_truncate_end().
Define the trx_t parameter only in debug builds. Rewrite a for(;;) loop
as a while loop for clarity.
trx_undo_truncate_end(): Wrapper for from trx_undo_truncate_end_func().
Pass the trx_t parameter only in debug builds.
trx_undo_erase_page_end(): Return TRUE if the page was non-empty
to begin with. Refuse to erase empty pages.
trx_undo_report_row_operation(): If the page for which the undo log
was too big was empty, free the undo page and return DB_TOO_BIG_RECORD.
rb:749 approved by Inaam Rana
Also addressed issues in bug #11745133, where we could mark a table
corrupted instead of crashing the server when found a corrupted buffer/page
if the table created with innodb_file_per_table on.
Bug#12637786 was fixed with rb:692 by marko. But that fix has a remaining
bug. It added this assert;
ut_ad(ind_field->prefix_len);
before a section of code that assumes there is a prefix_len.
The patch replaced code that explicitly avoided this with a check for
prefix_len. It turns out that the purge thread can get to that assert
without a prefix_len because it does not use a row_ext_t* .
When UNIV_DEBUG is not defined, the affect of this is that the purge thread
sets the dfield->len to zero and then cannot find the entry in the index to
purge. So secondary index entries remain unpurged.
This patch does not do the assert. Instead, it uses
'if (ind_field->prefix_len) {...}'
around the section of code that assumes a prefix_len. This is the way the
patch I provided to Marko did it.
The test case is simply modified to do a sleep(10) in order to give the
purge thread a chance to run. Without the code change to row0row.c, this
modified testcase will assert if InnoDB was compiled with UNIV_DEBUG.
I tried to sleep(5), but it did not always assert.
With this change, the index prefix column length lifted from 767 bytes
to 3072 bytes if "innodb_large_prefix" is set to "true".
rb://603 approved by Marko
HA_INNOBASE::UPDATE_ROW, TEMPORARY TABLE, TABLE LOCK".
Attempt to update an InnoDB temporary table under LOCK TABLES
led to assertion failure in both debug and production builds
if this temporary table was explicitly locked for READ. The
same scenario works fine for MyISAM temporary tables.
The assertion failure was caused by discrepancy between lock
that was requested on the rows of temporary table at LOCK TABLES
time and by update operation. Since SQL-layer requested a
read-lock at LOCK TABLES time InnoDB engine assumed that upcoming
statements which are going to be executed under LOCK TABLES will
only read table and therefore should acquire only S-lock.
An update operation broken this assumption by requesting X-lock.
Possible approaches to fixing this problem are:
1) Skip locking of temporary tables as locking doesn't make any
sense for connection-local objects.
2) Prohibit changing of temporary table locked by LOCK TABLES ...
READ.
Unfortunately both of these approaches have drawbacks which make
them unviable for stable versions of server.
So this patch takes another approach and changes code in such way
that LOCK TABLES for a temporary table will always request write
lock. In 5.5 version of this patch switch from read lock to write
lock is done on SQL-layer.
mysql-test/suite/innodb/r/innodb_mysql.result:
Added test for bug #11762012 - "54553: INNODB ASSERTS IN
HA_INNOBASE::UPDATE_ROW, TEMPORARY TABLE, TABLE LOCK".
mysql-test/suite/innodb/t/innodb_mysql.test:
Added test for bug #11762012 - "54553: INNODB ASSERTS IN
HA_INNOBASE::UPDATE_ROW, TEMPORARY TABLE, TABLE LOCK".
sql/sql_parse.cc:
Since a temporary table locked by LOCK TABLES can be updated even
if it was only locked for read we always request TL_WRITE locks
for such tables at LOCK TABLES time. This allows to avoid
discrepancy between locks acquired at LOCK TABLES time and by
a statement executed under LOCK TABLES. Such a discrepancy has
caused problems for InnoDB storage engine.
To support this change a part of code implementing LOCK TABLES
has been moved to a helper function.
HA_INNOBASE::UPDATE_ROW, TEMPORARY TABLE, TABLE LOCK".
Attempt to update an InnoDB temporary table under LOCK TABLES
led to assertion failure in both debug and production builds
if this temporary table was explicitly locked for READ. The
same scenario works fine for MyISAM temporary tables.
The assertion failure was caused by discrepancy between lock
that was requested on the rows of temporary table at LOCK TABLES
time and by update operation. Since SQL-layer requested a
read-lock at LOCK TABLES time InnoDB engine assumed that upcoming
statements which are going to be executed under LOCK TABLES will
only read table and therefore should acquire only S-lock.
An update operation broken this assumption by requesting X-lock.
Possible approaches to fixing this problem are:
1) Skip locking of temporary tables as locking doesn't make any
sense for connection-local objects.
2) Prohibit changing of temporary table locked by LOCK TABLES ...
READ.
Unfortunately both of these approaches have drawbacks which make
them unviable for stable versions of server.
So this patch takes another approach and changes code in such way
that LOCK TABLES for a temporary table will always request write
lock. In 5.1 version of this patch switch from read lock to write
lock is done inside of InnoDBs handler methods as doing it on
SQL-layer causes compatibility troubles with FLUSH TABLES WITH
READ LOCK.
mysql-test/suite/innodb/r/innodb_mysql.result:
Added test for bug #11762012 - "54553: INNODB ASSERTS IN
HA_INNOBASE::UPDATE_ROW, TEMPORARY TABLE, TABLE LOCK".
mysql-test/suite/innodb/t/innodb_mysql.test:
Added test for bug #11762012 - "54553: INNODB ASSERTS IN
HA_INNOBASE::UPDATE_ROW, TEMPORARY TABLE, TABLE LOCK".
mysql-test/suite/innodb_plugin/r/innodb_mysql.result:
Added test for bug #11762012 - "54553: INNODB ASSERTS IN
HA_INNOBASE::UPDATE_ROW, TEMPORARY TABLE, TABLE LOCK".
mysql-test/suite/innodb_plugin/t/innodb_mysql.test:
Added test for bug #11762012 - "54553: INNODB ASSERTS IN
HA_INNOBASE::UPDATE_ROW, TEMPORARY TABLE, TABLE LOCK".
storage/innobase/handler/ha_innodb.cc:
Assume that a temporary table locked by LOCK TABLES can be updated
even if it was only locked for read and therefore an X-lock should
be always requested for such tables.
storage/innodb_plugin/handler/ha_innodb.cc:
Assume that a temporary table locked by LOCK TABLES can be updated
even if it was only locked for read and therefore an X-lock should
be always requested for such tables.
DB_COL_APPEARS_TWICE_IN_INDEX: Remove. This condition is already
checked and reported by MySQL before passing the index definition to
the storage engine.
row_create_index_for_mysql(): Remove the redundant check for
DB_COL_APPEARS_TWICE_IN_INDEX. When enforcing the column prefix index
limit, invoke dict_mem_index_free(index) to plug the memory leak. In
the loop, use index->n_def instead of dict_index_get_n_fields(index),
because the latter would be 0 for indexes that have not been copied to
the data dictionary cache.
innodb-use-sys-malloc.test:
Add test cases for attempting to trigger the error checks in
row_create_index_for_mysql(). Before MySQL 5.5 and WL#5743, the leak
is only reproducible if ha_innobase::max_supported_key_part_length()
returned a higher limit than the one used in
row_create_index_for_mysql().
In MySQL 5.5 and later, the leak is reproducible with
innodb_large_prefix=true.
rb:688 approved by Jimmy Yang
Fix a failure of the re-enabled innodb-index.test in the embedded server.
Apparently, the embedded server does not default to ENGINE=InnoDB when
copying an InnoDB table by CREATE TABLE t2 SELECT * FROM t1;
