as well as
MDEV-19500 Update with join stopped worked if there is a call to a procedure in a trigger
MDEV-19521 Update Table Fails with Trigger and Stored Function
MDEV-19497 Replication stops because table not found
MDEV-19527 UPDATE + JOIN + TRIGGERS = table doesn't exists error
Reimplement the fix for (5d510fdbf0)
MDEV-18507 can't update temporary table when joined with table with triggers on read-only
instead of calling open_tables() twice, put multi-update
prepare code inside open_tables() loop.
Add a test for a MDL backoff-and-retry loop inside open_tables()
across multi-update prepare code.
triggers are opened and tables used in triggers are prelocked in
open_tables(). But multi-update can detect what tables will actually
be updated only later, after all main tables are opened.
Meaning, if a table is used in multi-update, but is not actually updated,
its on-update treggers will be opened and tables will be prelocked,
even if it's unnecessary. This can cause more tables to be
write-locked than needed, causing read_only errors, privilege errors
and lock waits.
Fix: don't open/prelock triggers unless table->updating is true.
In multi-update after setting table->updating=true, do a second
open_tables() for newly added tables, if any.
it always required UPDATE privilege on views, not being able to detect
when a views was not actually updated in multi-update.
fix: instead of marking all tables as "updating" by default,
only set "updating" on tables that will actually be updated
by multi-update. And mark the view "updating" if any of the
view's tables is.
Whenever one copies an IO_CACHE struct, one must remember to call
setup_io_cache, if not, the IO_CACHE's current_pos and end_pos
self-references will point to the previous struct's memory, which
could go out of scope. Commit 9003869390
fixes this problem in a more general fashion by removing the
self-references altogether, but for 5.5 we'll keep the old behaviour.
1. the same message text for INSERT and INSERT IGNORE
2. no new warnings in UPDATE IGNORE yet (big change for 5.5)
and replace a commonly used expression with a
named constant
CONSTRAINT.
Analysis
=======
INSERT and UPDATE operations using the IGNORE keyword which
causes FOREIGN KEY constraint violations reports an error
despite using the IGNORE keyword.
Foreign key violation errors were not ignored and reported
as errors instead of warnings even when IGNORE was set.
Fix
===
Added code to ignore the foreign key violation errors and
report them as warnings when the IGNORE keyword is used.
MDEV-8938 Server Crash on Update with joins
Make unique table check after setup_fields of update because unique table can materialize table and we do not need field resolving after materialization.
We have to run the derived table prepare before the unique table check to mark the derived table (in this case the unique table check can turn that table to materialized one).
The problem was that on opening all tables TL_WRITE, than local tables which is not updated set to TL_READ, but underlying tables of MyISAMmrg left untouched.
Prartition engine has not this problem.
All cases where lock_type assigned is not changed because call of virtual function is not cheap.
Apply the patch from Patryk Pomykalski:
- create_internal_tmp_table_from_heap() will now return information whether
the last row that we tried to write was a duplicate row.
(mysql-5.6 also has this change)
The problem was that if UPDATE with subselect caused a
deadlock inside InnoDB, this deadlock was not properly
handled by the SQL layer. This meant that the SQL layer
would try to unlock the row after InnoDB had rolled
back the transaction. This caused an assertion inside
InnoDB.
This patch fixes the problem by checking for errors
reported by SQL_SELECT::skip_record() and not calling
unlock_row() if any errors have been reported.
This bug is similar to Bug#13586591, but for UPDATE
rather than DELETE. Similar issues in filesort/opt_range/
sql_select will be investigated and handled in the scope
of Bug#16767929
The problem was that if UPDATE with subselect caused a
deadlock inside InnoDB, this deadlock was not properly
handled by the SQL layer. This meant that the SQL layer
would try to unlock the row after InnoDB had rolled
back the transaction. This caused an assertion inside
InnoDB.
This patch fixes the problem by checking for errors
reported by SQL_SELECT::skip_record() and not calling
unlock_row() if any errors have been reported.
This bug is similar to Bug#13586591, but for UPDATE
rather than DELETE. Similar issues in filesort/opt_range/
sql_select will be investigated and handled in the scope
of Bug#16767929
BACKGROUND:
The testcase i_innodb.innodb_bug14036214 when run under valgrind
leaks memory.
ANALYSIS:
In the code path of mysql_update, a temporary file is opened
using open_cached_file().
When an error has occured in that code path, this temporary
file was not closed since call to close_cached_file() was
missing.
This problem exists in 5.5 but it does not exists in 5.6 and
trunk.
This is because in 5.6 and trunk, when we issue the update
statement in the test case, it does not take the same code path
as in 5.5. The code path is different because a different plan
is chosen by optimizer.
See Bug#14036214 for details.
However, the problem can still be examined in 5.6 and trunk
by code inspection.
FIX:
The file opened by open_cached_file() has been closed by calling
close_cached_file() when an error occurs so that it does not
results in a memory leak.
BACKGROUND:
The testcase i_innodb.innodb_bug14036214 when run under valgrind
leaks memory.
ANALYSIS:
In the code path of mysql_update, a temporary file is opened
using open_cached_file().
When an error has occured in that code path, this temporary
file was not closed since call to close_cached_file() was
missing.
This problem exists in 5.5 but it does not exists in 5.6 and
trunk.
This is because in 5.6 and trunk, when we issue the update
statement in the test case, it does not take the same code path
as in 5.5. The code path is different because a different plan
is chosen by optimizer.
See Bug#14036214 for details.
However, the problem can still be examined in 5.6 and trunk
by code inspection.
FIX:
The file opened by open_cached_file() has been closed by calling
close_cached_file() when an error occurs so that it does not
results in a memory leak.
from MariaDB 10.0.
The bug in mdev-3948 was an instance of the problem fixed by Sergey's patch
in 10.0 - namely that the range optimizer could change table->[read | write]_set,
and not restore it.
revno: 3471
committer: Sergey Petrunya <psergey@askmonty.org>
branch nick: 10.0-serg-fix-imerge
timestamp: Sat 2012-11-03 12:24:36 +0400
message:
# MDEV-3817: Wrong result with index_merge+index_merge_intersection, InnoDB table, join, AND and OR conditions
Reconcile the fixes from:
#
# guilhem.bichot@oracle.com-20110805143029-ywrzuz15uzgontr0
# Fix for BUG#12698916 - "JOIN QUERY GIVES WRONG RESULT AT 2ND EXEC. OR
# AFTER FLUSH TABLES [-INT VS NULL]"
#
# guilhem.bichot@oracle.com-20111209150650-tzx3ldzxe1yfwji6
# Fix for BUG#12912171 - ASSERTION FAILED: QUICK->HEAD->READ_SET == SAVE_READ_SET
# and
#
and related fixes from: BUG#1006164, MDEV-376:
Now, ROR-merged QUICK_RANGE_SELECT objects make no assumptions about the values
of table->read_set and table->write_set.
Each QUICK_ROR_SELECT has (and had before) its own column bitmap, but now, all
QUICK_ROR_SELECT's functions that care: reset(), init_ror_merged_scan(), and
get_next() will set table->read_set when invoked and restore it back to what
it was before the call before they return.
This allows to avoid the mess when somebody else modifies table->read_set for
some reason.
If triggers are used for an insert/update/delete statement than the values of
all virtual columns must be computed as any of them may be used by the triggers.
CONSISTENT SNAPSHOT OPTION
A transaction is started with a consistent snapshot. After
the transaction is started new indexes are added to the
table. Now when we issue an update statement, the optimizer
chooses an index. When the index scan is being initialized
via ha_innobase::change_active_index(), InnoDB reports
the error code HA_ERR_TABLE_DEF_CHANGED, with message
stating that "insufficient history for index".
This error message is propagated up to the SQL layer. But
the my_error() api is never called. The statement level
diagnostics area is not updated with the correct error
status (it remains in Diagnostics_area::DA_EMPTY).
Hence the following check in the Protocol::end_statement()
fails.
516 case Diagnostics_area::DA_EMPTY:
517 default:
518 DBUG_ASSERT(0);
519 error= send_ok(thd->server_status, 0, 0, 0, NULL);
520 break;
The fix is to backport the fix of bugs 14365043, 11761652
and 11746399.
14365043 PROTOCOL::END_STATEMENT(): ASSERTION `0' FAILED
11761652 HA_RND_INIT() RESULT CODE NOT CHECKED
11746399 RETURN VALUES OF HA_INDEX_INIT() AND INDEX_INIT() IGNORED
rb://1227 approved by guilhem and mattiasj.
CONSISTENT SNAPSHOT OPTION
A transaction is started with a consistent snapshot. After
the transaction is started new indexes are added to the
table. Now when we issue an update statement, the optimizer
chooses an index. When the index scan is being initialized
via ha_innobase::change_active_index(), InnoDB reports
the error code HA_ERR_TABLE_DEF_CHANGED, with message
stating that "insufficient history for index".
This error message is propagated up to the SQL layer. But
the my_error() api is never called. The statement level
diagnostics area is not updated with the correct error
status (it remains in Diagnostics_area::DA_EMPTY).
Hence the following check in the Protocol::end_statement()
fails.
516 case Diagnostics_area::DA_EMPTY:
517 default:
518 DBUG_ASSERT(0);
519 error= send_ok(thd->server_status, 0, 0, 0, NULL);
520 break;
The fix is to backport the fix of bugs 14365043, 11761652
and 11746399.
14365043 PROTOCOL::END_STATEMENT(): ASSERTION `0' FAILED
11761652 HA_RND_INIT() RESULT CODE NOT CHECKED
11746399 RETURN VALUES OF HA_INDEX_INIT() AND INDEX_INIT() IGNORED
rb://1227 approved by guilhem and mattiasj.
Introduction of cost based decision on filesort vs index for UPDATE
statements changed detection of the fact that the index used to scan the
table is being updated. The new design missed the case of index merge
when there is no single index to check. That was worked until a recent
change in InnoDB after which it went into infinite recursion if update of
the used index wasn't properly detected.
The fix consists of 'used key being updated' detection code from 5.1.
sql/sql_update.cc:
Bug#14248833: UPDATE ON INNODB TABLE ENTERS RECURSION
The check for used key being updated is extended to cover the case when
index merge is used.
Introduction of cost based decision on filesort vs index for UPDATE
statements changed detection of the fact that the index used to scan the
table is being updated. The new design missed the case of index merge
when there is no single index to check. That was worked until a recent
change in InnoDB after which it went into infinite recursion if update of
the used index wasn't properly detected.
The fix consists of 'used key being updated' detection code from 5.1.
The patch enables back constant subquery execution during
query optimization after it was disabled during the development
of MWL#89 (cost-based choice of IN-TO-EXISTS vs MATERIALIZATION).
The main idea is that constant subqueries are allowed to be executed
during optimization if their execution is not expensive.
The approach is as follows:
- Constant subqueries are recursively optimized in the beginning of
JOIN::optimize of the outer query. This is done by the new method
JOIN::optimize_constant_subqueries(). This is done so that the cost
of executing these queries can be estimated.
- Optimization of the outer query proceeds normally. During this phase
the optimizer may request execution of non-expensive constant subqueries.
Each place where the optimizer may potentially execute an expensive
expression is guarded with the predicate Item::is_expensive().
- The implementation of Item_subselect::is_expensive has been extended
to use the number of examined rows (estimated by the optimizer) as a
way to determine whether the subquery is expensive or not.
- The new system variable "expensive_subquery_limit" controls how many
examined rows are considered to be not expensive. The default is 100.
In addition, multiple changes were needed to make this solution work
in the light of the changes made by MWL#89. These changes were needed
to fix various crashes and wrong results, and legacy bugs discovered
during development.
- Don't call update_virtual_fields() if table->vfield is not set
- Don't prealloc memory for in open_tables() as this is very seldom used.
sql/records.cc:
Don't call update_virtual_fields() if table->vfield is not set
sql/sql_base.cc:
Don't prealloc memory for in open_tables() as this is very seldom used.
Don't call update_virtual_fields() if table->vfield is not set
sql/sql_delete.cc:
Don't call update_virtual_fields() if table->vfield is not set
sql/sql_handler.cc:
Don't call update_virtual_fields() if table->vfield is not set
sql/sql_join_cache.cc:
Don't call update_virtual_fields() if table->vfield is not set
Move some frequent values to local variables
sql/sql_table.cc:
Don't call update_virtual_fields() if table->vfield is not set
sql/sql_update.cc:
Don't call update_virtual_fields() if table->vfield is not set
sql/table.cc:
Assert if update_virtual_fields is called with wrong parameters
For single table update/insert added deep check of single tables (single_table_updatable()).
For multi-table view insert added additional check of target table (check_view_single_update).
Multi-update was correct.
Test suite for all cases added.
