to leave
The artifact was caused by
a flaw in concurrent accessing the slave's io thd by
the io itself and a handling show slave status thread.
Namely, show_master_info did not acquire mi->run_lock mutex that is
specified for mi->io_thd member.
Fixed with deploying the mutex locking and unlocking. The mutex is kept
short time and without interleaving with mi->data_lock mutex.
Todo: to report and fix an issue with
sys_var_slave_skip_counter::{methods}
seem to acquire incorrectly
active_mi->rli.run_lock
instead of the specified
active_mi->rli.data_lock
A test case is difficult to compose, so rpl_packet should continue serving
as the indicator.
The problem is that deprecated syntax warnings were not being
suppressed when the stored routine is being parsed for the first
execution. It's doesn't make sense to print out deprecated
syntax warnings when the routine is being executed because this
kind of warning only matters when the routine is being created.
The solution is to suppress deprecated syntax warnings when
parsing the stored routine for loading into the cache (might
mean that the routine is being executed for the first time).
does not use trans tables
There had been two issues.
Rollback statement was recorded in binlog even though a multi-update
had not modified any non-transactional table.
The reason for this artifact was a false initial value of multi_update::transactional_tables.
Yet another artifact that explained on the bug page is that
`ha_autocommit_or_rollback' works differently depending on whether
a transaction engine has been compiled in.
Fixed: with setting multi_update::transactional_tables to zero at initialization
time. Multi-update on non-trans table won't cause ROLLBACK in binlog with
either compilation option.
The 2nd mentioned artifact comprises a self-standing issue (to be reported
separately).
the reason for the failure were incorrect asserts.
Removing asserts altogether as there is no the implication does not hold
(as explained in the comments for the file).
Problem: some collation handlers called incorrect version
of my_like_range_xxx(), which led to wrong min_str and max_str,
so like range optimizer threw away good records.
Fix: changing the wrong handlers to call proper version of
my_like_range_xxx().
exists t1,t2,t3'
Bug #34245 Test ndb_binlog_multi fails for 'CREATE TABLE'
Bug #34246 Test rpl_ndb_transaction fails with 'Failed to create
'mysql/ndb_apply_status'
Tests cases didn't wait for cluster to come up due to a typo
in have_multi_ndb.inc.
