Commit graph

689 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Serge Kozlov
9e3b092c92 Backport for WL#4416 2009-11-27 02:32:01 +03:00
Alfranio Correia
897d87f63a merge 5.1-bugteam (local) --> 5.1-bugteam 2009-11-21 13:02:18 +00:00
Sven Sandberg
2f78abd21b BUG#47995: Mark system functions as unsafe
Problem: Some system functions that could return different values on
master and slave were not marked unsafe. In particular:
 GET_LOCK
 IS_FREE_LOCK
 IS_USED_LOCK
 MASTER_POS_WAIT
 RELEASE_LOCK
 SLEEP
 SYSDATE
 VERSION
Fix: Mark these functions unsafe.


mysql-test/extra/rpl_tests/rpl_stm_000001.test:
  - The test does not work in mixed mode any more, since it tries to
    simulate an error in the sql thread in a query that uses get_lock.
    Since get_lock now causes the query to be logged in row format,
    the error didn't happen. Hence, we now force statement mode.
  - Warnings must be disabled when the unsafe query is issued.
  - Replaced some save_master_pos+connection slave+sync_with_master
    by sync_slave_with_master.
mysql-test/suite/binlog/r/binlog_stm_mix_innodb_myisam.result:
  updated result file
mysql-test/suite/binlog/r/binlog_stm_row.result:
  updated result file
mysql-test/suite/binlog/r/binlog_unsafe.result:
  updated result file
mysql-test/suite/binlog/t/binlog_killed.test:
  binlog_killed only works in statement format now, since
  it switches to row mode in mixed mode.
mysql-test/suite/binlog/t/binlog_stm_mix_innodb_myisam.test:
  suppress warnings for unsafe statements
mysql-test/suite/binlog/t/binlog_stm_row.test:
  - Suppress warnings in test that causes warnings.
  - The test sets binlog format explicitly, so no need to execute it
    twice.
mysql-test/suite/binlog/t/binlog_unsafe.test:
  Added test for all unsafe system functions. This test also includes
  system functions that were unsafe prior to BUG#47995.
mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_err_ignoredtable.result:
  updated result file
mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_get_lock.result:
  updated result file
mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_nondeterministic_functions.result:
  new result file
mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_stm_000001.result:
  updated result file
mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_trigger.result:
  updated result file
mysql-test/suite/rpl/t/rpl_err_ignoredtable.test:
  - suppress warnings for unsafe statement
  - replaced save_master_pos+connection slave+sync_with_master
    with sync_slave_with_master
mysql-test/suite/rpl/t/rpl_get_lock.test:
  update test case that causes new warnings
mysql-test/suite/rpl/t/rpl_nondeterministic_functions.test:
  Added new test case for nondeterministic functions.
mysql-test/suite/rpl/t/rpl_trigger.test:
  update test case that causes new warnings
sql/item_create.cc:
  Marked some system functions unsafe.
sql/item_strfunc.cc:
  Clarified comment related to this bug.
sql/sql_yacc.yy:
  Marked sysdate unsafe.
2009-11-18 15:50:31 +01:00
unknown
a962160eec Merge with MySQL 5.1, with following additions:
- Moved some code from innodb_plugin to xtradb, to ensure that all tests runs
- Did changes in pbxt and maria storage engines becasue of changes in thd->query
- Reverted wrong code in sql_table.cc for how ROW_FORMAT is used.

This is a re-commit of Monty's merge to eliminate an extra commit from
MySQL-5.1.42 that was accidentally included in the merge.

This is a merge of the MySQL 5.1.41 clone-off (clone-5.1.41-build). In
case there are any extra changes done before final MySQL 5.1.41
release, these will need to be merged later before MariaDB 5.1.41
release.
2009-11-16 21:49:51 +01:00
Luis Soares
d8ca6b9dd9 manual merge: mysql-5.1-rep+2 (bug tree) --> mysql-5.1-rep+2 (latest)
CONFLICTS
=========

Text conflict in sql/sql_yacc.yy
1 conflicts encountered.
2009-11-13 10:17:53 +00:00
unknown
0d46e5880e Backport Bug #45827 Stmt using two autoinc values does not produce unsafe warning
One statement that have more than one different tables to update with 
autoinc columns just was marked as unsafe in mixed mode, so the unsafe 
warning can't be produced in statement mode.
      
To fix the problem, mark the statement as unsafe in statement mode too.


mysql-test/extra/rpl_tests/rpl_insert_id.test:
  The test case is updated due to the patch of bug#45827.
mysql-test/suite/binlog/r/binlog_stm_mix_innodb_myisam.result:
  The test result is updated due to the patch of bug#45827.
mysql-test/suite/binlog/r/binlog_unsafe.result:
  Test result for bug#45827.
mysql-test/suite/binlog/t/binlog_unsafe.test:
  Added test to verify if stmt that have more than one
  different tables to update with autoinc columns will 
  produce unsafe warning
mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_stm_auto_increment_bug33029.result:
  The test result is updated due to the patch of bug#45827.
mysql-test/suite/rpl/t/rpl_trigger.test:
  The test case is updated due to the patch of bug#45827.
mysql-test/suite/rpl/t/rpl_variables_stm.test:
  The test case is updated due to the patch of bug#45827.
sql/sql_base.cc:
  Reomved the 'set_current_stmt_binlog_row_based_if_mixed' function 
  for producing unsafe warnings by executing 'decide_logging_format' 
  function later in statement mode
2009-11-13 16:29:35 +08:00
Alfranio Correia
4677f4de0f Post-fix for WL#2687 WL#5072 BUG#40278 BUG#47175
Create a set of test cases to see if some DDL statements implicitly commit
a transaction on the NDB and are written directly to the binary log without
going through either the Statement- or Transactional-Cache.
2009-11-13 00:17:10 +00:00
Alexander Nozdrin
e29ea6c2f8 Auto-merge from mysql-next-mr. 2009-11-12 15:13:43 +03:00
Alfranio Correia
518f793265 Post-fix after mysql-5.1-rep+2 --> mysql-5.1-rep+3.
mysql-test/extra/binlog_tests/binlog_failure_mixing_engines.test:
  Merged the test case into rpl_mixing_engines.test.
mysql-test/extra/rpl_tests/rpl_mixing_engines.inc:
  Incorporated some tests from binlog_failure_mixing_engines.test and
  fixed after BUG#47323.
mysql-test/extra/rpl_tests/rpl_mixing_engines.test:
  Incorporated some tests from binlog_failure_mixing_engines.test and
  fixed after BUG#47323.
mysql-test/suite/binlog/r/binlog_mixed_failure_mixing_engines.result:
  Merged the test case into rpl_mixing_engines.test.
mysql-test/suite/binlog/r/binlog_row_failure_mixing_engines.result:
  Merged the test case into rpl_mixing_engines.test.
mysql-test/suite/binlog/t/binlog_mixed_failure_mixing_engines.test:
  Merged the test case into rpl_mixing_engines.test.
mysql-test/suite/binlog/t/binlog_row_failure_mixing_engines.test:
  Merged the test case into rpl_mixing_engines.test.
mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_mixed_mixing_engines.result:
  Incorporated some tests from binlog_failure_mixing_engines.test and
  changed after BUG#47323.
mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_row_mixing_engines.result:
  Incorporated some tests from binlog_failure_mixing_engines.test and
  changed after BUG#47323.
mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_stm_mixing_engines.result:
  Incorporated some tests from binlog_failure_mixing_engines.test and
  changed after BUG#47323.
2009-11-11 16:35:58 +00:00
Alfranio Correia
6ed2c82436 Post-fix for merge mysql-5.1-rep+2 --> mysql-5.1-rep+3
mysql-test/extra/rpl_tests/rpl_implicit_commit_binlog.test:
  Re-enabled some parts of the test after BUG#46572
mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_mixed_implicit_commit_binlog.result:
  Re-enabled some parts of the test after BUG#46572
mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_mysql_upgrade.result:
  Suppressed warning messages due to unsafe statements.
mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_row_implicit_commit_binlog.result:
  Re-enabled some parts of the test after BUG#46572
mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_stm_implicit_commit_binlog.result:
  Re-enabled some parts of the test after BUG#46572
mysql-test/suite/rpl/t/rpl_mixed_implicit_commit_binlog.test:
  Re-enabled some parts of the test after BUG#46572
mysql-test/suite/rpl/t/rpl_mysql_upgrade.test:
  Suppressed warning messages due to unsafe statements.
mysql-test/suite/rpl/t/rpl_row_implicit_commit_binlog.test:
  Re-enabled some parts of the test after BUG#46572
mysql-test/suite/rpl/t/rpl_stm_implicit_commit_binlog.test:
  Re-enabled some parts of the test after BUG#46572
2009-11-11 13:51:49 +00:00
Andrei Elkin
7eb789a723 merging 5.1 main -> 5.1-rep+2 -> 5.1-rep+3; binlog_unsafe , rpl_mysql_upgrade fail and are under treatment 2009-11-10 20:45:15 +02:00
Andrei Elkin
3c1e1f6d6c merging 5.1 main -> rpl+2. Some manual work required mostly due to bug46640 2009-11-06 18:35:04 +02:00
Alexander Nozdrin
7cd11f45be Manual merge from mysql-trunk-merge. 2009-11-06 17:20:27 +03:00
Luis Soares
fb175a1beb BUG#48048: Deprecated constructs need removal in Betony
NOTE: Backport of:

bzr log -r revid:sp1r-serg@sergbook.mysql.com-20070505200319-38337
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2469.263.4
committer: serg@sergbook.mysql.com
timestamp: Sat 2007-05-05 13:03:19 -0700
message:
  Removing deprecated features:
  --master-XXX command-line options
  log_bin_trust_routine_creators
  table_type
  BACKUP TABLE ...
  RESTORE TABLE ...
  SHOW PLUGIN
  LOAD TABLE ... FROM MASTER
  LOAD DATA FROM MASTER
  SHOW INNODB STATUS
  SHOW MUTEX STATUS
  SHOW TABLE TYPES
  ... TIMESTAMP(N)
  ... TYPE=engine
  
  RESET SLAVE don't reset connection parameters anymore
  LOAD DATA: check opt_secure_file_priv before access(filename)
  improved WARN_DEPRECATED macro
2009-11-04 12:28:20 +00:00
Alfranio Correia
19c380aaff WL#2687 WL#5072 BUG#40278 BUG#47175
Non-transactional updates that take place inside a transaction present problems
for logging because they are visible to other clients before the transaction
is committed, and they are not rolled back even if the transaction is rolled
back. It is not always possible to log correctly in statement format when both
transactional and non-transactional tables are used in the same transaction.

In the current patch, we ensure that such scenario is completely safe under the
ROW and MIXED modes.
2009-11-03 19:02:56 +00:00
Alexey Botchkov
d9ea0d0cd5 Bug#41371 Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
For application compatibility reasons  MySQL converts "<autoincrement_column> IS NULL"
    predicates to "<autoincrement_column> = LAST_INSERT_ID()" in the first SELECT following an
    INSERT regardless of whether they're top level predicates or not. This causes wrong and
    obscure results when these predicates are combined with others on the same columns. Fixed
    by only doing the transformation on a single top-level predicate if a special SQL mode is
    turned on (sql_auto_is_null).
    Also made sql_auto_is_null off by default.

per-file comments:
  mysql-test/r/func_isnull.result
Bug#41371      Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
    test result updated

  mysql-test/t/func_isnull.test
Bug#41371      Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
    test case added

  sql/mysqld.cc
Bug#41371      Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
    sql_auto_is_null now is OFF by default.

  sql/sql_select.cc
Bug#41371      Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
    remove_eq_conds() split in two parts - one only checks the upper condition,
    the req_remove_eq_conds() recursively checks all the condition tree.

  mysql-test/extra/rpl_tests/rpl_insert_id.test
Bug#41371      Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
        test fixed (set the sql_auto_is_null variable)

  mysql-test/r/mysqlbinlog.result
Bug#41371      Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
        result updated

  mysql-test/r/mysqlbinlog2.result
Bug#41371      Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
        result updated

  mysql-test/r/odbc.result
Bug#41371      Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
        result updated

  mysql-test/r/query_cache.result
Bug#41371      Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
        result updated

  mysql-test/r/user_var-binlog.result
Bug#41371      Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
        result updated

  mysql-test/suite/binlog/r/binlog_row_ctype_ucs.result
Bug#41371      Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
        result updated

  mysql-test/suite/binlog/r/binlog_stm_ctype_ucs.result
Bug#41371      Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
        result updated

  mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_insert_id.result
Bug#41371      Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
        result updated

  mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_row_mysqlbinlog.result
Bug#41371      Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
        result updated

  mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_sp.result
Bug#41371      Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
        result updated

  mysql-test/t/odbc.test
Bug#41371      Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
        test fixed (set the sql_auto_is_null variable)
2009-11-03 17:54:41 +04:00
unknown
9519c8e597 Manual Merge 2009-11-03 18:20:08 +08:00
Luis Soares
a382917684 BUG#48297: Schema name is ignored when LOAD DATA is written into
binlog, replication aborts

In SBR or MBR, the schema name is not being written to the binlog
when executing a LOAD DATA statement. This becomes a problem when
the current database (lets call it db1) is different from the
table's schema (lets call it db2). For instance, take the
following statements:
  
  use db1;
  load data local infile 'infile.txt' into table db2.t

Should this statement be logged without t's schema (db2), when
replaying it, one can get db1.t populated instead of db2.t (if
db1.t exists). On the other hand, if there is no db1.t at all,
replication will stop.

We fix this by always logging the table (in load file) with fully
qualified name when its schema is different from the current
database or when no default database was selected.
2009-10-27 15:15:53 +00:00
Luis Soares
f1bb8c3c55 manual merge: mysql-5.1-rep+2-delivery1 --> mysql-5.1-rpl-merge
Conflicts
=========

Text conflict in .bzr-mysql/default.conf
Text conflict in libmysqld/CMakeLists.txt
Text conflict in libmysqld/Makefile.am
Text conflict in mysql-test/collections/default.experimental
Text conflict in mysql-test/extra/rpl_tests/rpl_row_sp006.test
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/binlog/r/binlog_tmp_table.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_loaddata.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_loaddata_fatal.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_row_create_table.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_row_sp006_InnoDB.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_stm_log.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl_ndb/r/rpl_ndb_circular_simplex.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl_ndb/r/rpl_ndb_sp006.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/t/mysqlbinlog.test
Text conflict in sql/CMakeLists.txt
Text conflict in sql/Makefile.am
Text conflict in sql/log_event_old.cc
Text conflict in sql/rpl_rli.cc
Text conflict in sql/slave.cc
Text conflict in sql/sql_binlog.cc
Text conflict in sql/sql_lex.h
21 conflicts encountered.

NOTE
====
 mysql-5.1-rpl-merge has been made a mirror of mysql-next-mr:
 - "mysql-5.1-rpl-merge$ bzr pull ../mysql-next-mr"

 This is the first cset (merge/...) committed after pulling 
 from mysql-next-mr.
2009-10-22 23:30:28 +01:00
Alfranio Correia
0c2d74c60b BUG#48091 valgrind errors when slave has double not null and master has double null
Backporting BUG#47741 to mysql-5.1-bugteam
2009-10-22 01:21:50 +01:00
Alfranio Correia
925ac7f4eb BUG#48091 valgrind errors when slave has double not null and master has double null
Backporting BUG#43789 to mysql-5.1-bugteam

Post-fix for BUG#43789.
2009-10-22 01:19:52 +01:00
Alfranio Correia
7e5cf52c3e BUG#48091 valgrind errors when slave has double not null and master has double null
Backporting BUG#43789 to mysql-5.1-bugteam
                              
The replication was generating corrupted data, warning messages on Valgrind
and aborting on debug mode while replicating a "null" to "not null" field.
Specifically the unpack_row routine, was considering the slave's table
definition and trying to retrieve a field value, where there was nothing to be
retrieved, ignoring the fact that the value was defined as "null" by the master.
                              
To fix the problem, we proceed as follows:
                              
1 - If it is not STRICT sql_mode, implicit default values are used, regardless
if it is multi-row or single-row statement.
                              
2 - However, if it is STRICT mode, then a we do what follows:
                              
2.1 If it is a transactional engine, we do a rollback on the first NULL that is
to be set into a NOT NULL column and return an error.
                              
2.2 If it is a non-transactional engine and it is the first row to be inserted
with multi-row, we also return the error. Otherwise, we proceed with the
execution, use implicit default values and print out warning messages.
                        
Unfortunately, the current patch cannot mimic the behavior showed by the master
for updates on multi-tables and multi-row inserts. This happens because such
statements are unfolded in different row events. For instance, considering the
following updates and strict mode:
                        
(master)
create table t1 (a int);
create table t2 (a int not null);
insert into t1 values (1);
insert into t2 values (2);
update t1, t2 SET t1.a=10, t2.a=NULL;
                        
t1 would have (10) and t2 would have (0) as this would be handled as a
multi-row update. On the other hand, if we had the following updates:
                        
(master)
create table t1 (a int);
create table t2 (a int);
                        
(slave)
create table t1 (a int);
create table t2 (a int not null);
                        
(master)
insert into t1 values (1);
insert into t2 values (2);
update t1, t2 SET t1.a=10, t2.a=NULL;
                        
On the master t1 would have (10) and t2 would have (NULL). On
the slave, t1 would have (10) but the update on t1 would fail.
2009-10-22 01:15:45 +01:00
Alfranio Correia
deea727fce BUG#48091 valgrind errors when slave has double not null and master has double null
Backporting BUG#38173 to mysql-5.1-bugteam

The reason of  the bug was incompatibile with the master side behaviour.
INSERT query on the master is allowed to insert into a table without specifying
values of DEFAULT-less fields if sql_mode is not strict.
                  
Fixed with checking sql_mode by the sql thread to decide how to react.
Non-strict sql_mode should allow Write_rows event to complete.
                  
todo: warnings can be shown via show slave status, still this is a 
separate rather general issue how to show warnings for the slave threads.
2009-10-22 01:10:42 +01:00
Tatiana A. Nurnberg
3f0d0d0633 manual merge of 28141 2009-10-20 11:00:07 -07:00
He Zhenxing
9630512875 Manual merge 5.1-rep+2 to 5.1-rep+3 2009-10-18 11:57:38 +08:00
unknown
6aad537a6a Merge MySQL 5.1.39 into MariaDB 5.1. 2009-10-15 23:38:29 +02:00
unknown
f9c6730258 Bug#46640: output from mysqlbinlog command in 5.1 breaks replication
The BINLOG statement was sharing too much code with the slave SQL thread, introduced with
the patch for Bug#32407. This caused statements to be logged with the wrong server_id, the
id stored inside the events of the BINLOG statement rather than the id of the running 
server.
      
Fix by rearranging code a bit so that only relevant parts of the code are executed by
the BINLOG statement, and the server_id of the server executing the statements will 
not be overrided by the server_id stored in the 'format description BINLOG statement'.

mysql-test/extra/binlog_tests/binlog.test:
  Added test to verify if the server_id stored in the 'format 
  description BINLOG statement' will override the server_id
  of the server executing the statements.
mysql-test/suite/binlog/r/binlog_row_binlog.result:
  Test result for bug#46640
mysql-test/suite/binlog/r/binlog_stm_binlog.result:
  Test result for bug#46640
sql/log_event.cc:
  Moved rows_event_stmt_clean() call from update_pos() to apply_event(). This in any case
  makes more sense, and is needed as update_pos() is no longer called when executing
  BINLOG statements.
  
  Moved setting of rli->relay_log.description_event_for_exec from 
  Format_description_log_event::do_update_pos() to 
  Format_description_log_event::do_apply_event()
sql/log_event_old.cc:
  Moved rows_event_stmt_clean() call from update_pos() to apply_event(). This in any case
  makes more sense, and is needed as update_pos() is no longer called when executing
  BINLOG statements.
sql/slave.cc:
  The skip flag is no longer needed, as the code path for BINLOG statement has been 
  cleaned up.
sql/sql_binlog.cc:
  Don't invoke the update_pos() code path for the BINLOG statement, as it contains code 
  that is redundant and/or harmful (especially setting thd->server_id).
2009-10-14 09:39:05 +08:00
Luis Soares
9226c847f5 BUG#44661: automerge local 5.1-bt bug branch --> local 5.1-bt up to date 2009-10-07 22:26:36 +01:00
Alfranio Correia
15127bcdf3 mysql-5.1-bugteam (local) --> mysql-5.1-bugteam 2009-10-06 11:25:36 +01:00
Alfranio Correia
7e0da4352c BUG#47678 Changes to n-tables that happen early in a trans. are only flushed upon commit
Let
    - T be a transactional table and N non-transactional table.
    - B be begin, C commit and R rollback.
    - N be a statement that accesses and changes only N-tables.
    - T be a statement that accesses and changes only T-tables.

In RBR, changes to N-tables that happen early in a transaction are not immediately flushed
upon committing a statement. This behavior may, however, break consistency in the presence
of concurrency since changes done to N-tables become immediately visible to other
connections. To fix this problem, we do the following:

  . B N N T C would log - B N C B N C B T C.
  . B N N T R would log - B N C B N C B T R.

Note that we are not preserving history from the master as we are introducing a commit that
never happened. However, this seems to be more acceptable than the possibility of breaking
consistency in the presence of concurrency.
2009-10-06 01:54:00 +01:00
Alfranio Correia
14d1909440 BUG#47287 RBR: replication diff on basic case with txn- and non-txn tables in a statement
Let
  - T be a transactional table and N non-transactional table.
  - B be begin, C commit and R rollback.
  - M be a mixed statement, i.e. a statement that updates both T and N.
  - M* be a mixed statement that fails while updating either T or N.

This patch restore the behavior presented in 5.1.37 for rows either produced in
the RBR or MIXED modes, when a M* statement that happened early in a transaction
had their changes written to the binary log outside the boundaries of the
transaction and wrapped in a BEGIN/ROLLBACK. This was done to keep the slave
consistent with with the master as the rollback would keep the changes on N and
undo them on T. In particular, we do what follows:

  . B M* T C would log - B M* R B T C.

Note that, we are not preserving history from the master as we are introducing a
rollback that never happened. However, this seems to be more acceptable than
making the slave diverge. We do not fix the following case:

  . B T M* C would log B T M* C.

The slave will diverge as the changes on T tables that originated from the M
statement are rolled back on the master but not on the slave. Unfortunately, we
cannot simply rollback the transaction as this would undo any uncommitted
changes on T tables.

SBR is not considered in this patch because a failing statement is written to
the binary along with the error code and a slave executes and then rolls back
the statement when it has an associated error code, thus undoing the effects
on T. In RBR and MBR, a full-fledged fix will be pushed after the WL 2687.
2009-10-06 01:38:58 +01:00
He Zhenxing
54120363ef Backport fixes for the follow tests
binlog_tmp_table
rpl_row_sp006_InnoDB
rpl_slave_status
2009-10-02 17:24:21 +08:00
Andrei Elkin
737910fb11 merge from 5.1-rpl+2 repo to a local branch with HB and bug@27808 fixes 2009-10-01 20:22:44 +03:00
unknown
41e0d0a3ab Bug #45677 Slave stops with Duplicate entry for key PRIMARY when using trigger
The problem is that there is only one autoinc value associated with 
the query when binlogging. If more than one autoinc values are used 
in the query, the autoinc values after the first one can be inserted 
wrongly on slave. So these autoinc values can become inconsistent on 
master and slave.

The problem is resolved by marking all the statements that invoke 
a trigger or call a function that updated autoinc fields as unsafe, 
and will switch to row-format in Mixed mode. Actually, the statement 
is safe if just one autoinc value is used in sub-statement, but it's 
impossible to check how many autoinc values are used in sub-statement.)

mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_auto_increment_update_failure.result:
  Test result for bug#45677
mysql-test/suite/rpl/t/rpl_auto_increment_update_failure.test:
  Added test to verify the following two properties:
  P1) insert/update in an autoinc column causes statement to 
  be logged in row format if binlog_format=mixed
  P2) if binlog_format=mixed, and a trigger or function contains 
      two or more inserts/updates in a table that has an autoinc 
      column, then the slave should not go out of sync, even if 
      there are concurrent transactions.
sql/sql_base.cc:
  Added function 'has_write_table_with_auto_increment' to check 
  if one (or more) write tables have auto_increment columns.
  
  Removed function 'has_two_write_locked_tables_with_auto_increment', 
  because the function is included in function 
  'has_write_table_with_auto_increment'.
2009-10-01 07:19:36 +08:00
Sven Sandberg
3d467f04a1 merged fixes for BUG#39934 to 5.1-rpl+3
Also renamed current_stmt_binlog_row_based to
current_stmt_binlog_format_row for consistency
2009-09-30 18:00:22 +02:00
Alfranio Correia
0ebecf7f0a BUG#47741 rpl_ndb_extraCol fails in next-mr (mysql-5.1-rep+2) in RBR
This is a temporary fix.

NOTE: Backporting the patch to next-mr.
2009-09-30 16:25:01 +01:00
Alfranio Correia
9922788d7a Post-fix for BUG#43789
NOTE: Backporting the patch to next-mr.
2009-09-30 15:17:15 +01:00
Alfranio Correia
25162d0166 BUG#43789 different master/slave table defs cause crash: text/varchar null
vs not null

NOTE: Backporting the patch to next-mr.
                        
The replication was generating corrupted data, warning messages on Valgrind
and aborting on debug mode while replicating a "null" to "not null" field.
Specifically the unpack_row routine, was considering the slave's table
definition and trying to retrieve a field value, where there was nothing to be
retrieved, ignoring the fact that the value was defined as "null" by the master.
                        
To fix the problem, we proceed as follows:
                        
1 - If it is not STRICT sql_mode, implicit default values are used, regardless
if it is multi-row or single-row statement.
                        
2 - However, if it is STRICT mode, then a we do what follows:
                        
2.1 If it is a transactional engine, we do a rollback on the first NULL that is
to be set into a NOT NULL column and return an error.
                        
2.2 If it is a non-transactional engine and it is the first row to be inserted
with multi-row, we also return the error. Otherwise, we proceed with the
execution, use implicit default values and print out warning messages.
                  
Unfortunately, the current patch cannot mimic the behavior showed by the master
for updates on multi-tables and multi-row inserts. This happens because such
statements are unfolded in different row events. For instance, considering the
following updates and strict mode:
                  
(master)
create table t1 (a int);
create table t2 (a int not null);
insert into t1 values (1);
insert into t2 values (2);
update t1, t2 SET t1.a=10, t2.a=NULL;
                  
t1 would have (10) and t2 would have (0) as this would be handled as a
multi-row update. On the other hand, if we had the following updates:
                  
(master)
create table t1 (a int);
create table t2 (a int);
                  
(slave)
create table t1 (a int);
create table t2 (a int not null);
                  
(master)
insert into t1 values (1);
insert into t2 values (2);
update t1, t2 SET t1.a=10, t2.a=NULL;
                  
On the master t1 would have (10) and t2 would have (NULL). On
the slave, t1 would have (10) but the update on t1 would fail.
2009-09-29 15:18:44 +01:00
Alfranio Correia
cc9e25af54 BUG#38173 Field doesn't have a default value with row-based replication
NOTE: Backporting the patch to next-mr.
      
The reason of  the bug was incompatibile with the master side behaviour.
INSERT query on the master is allowed to insert into a table without specifying
values of DEFAULT-less fields if sql_mode is not strict.
            
Fixed with checking sql_mode by the sql thread to decide how to react.
Non-strict sql_mode should allow Write_rows event to complete.
            
todo: warnings can be shown via show slave status, still this is a 
separate rather general issue how to show warnings for the slave threads.
2009-09-29 15:04:21 +01:00
Andrei Elkin
5983785ef4 WL#342 heartbeat
backporting from 6.0 code base to 5.1.
2009-09-29 14:16:23 +03:00
Luis Soares
f0886a4d9d BUG#28777, WL#4293: SHOW BINLOG EVENTS does not work on relay log
files

NOTE: this is the backport to next-mr.
            
SHOW BINLOG EVENTS does not work with relay log files. If issuing
"SHOW BINLOG EVENTS IN 'relay-log.000001'" in a non-empty relay
log file (relay-log.000001), mysql reports empty set.
            
This patch addresses this issue by extending the SHOW command
with RELAYLOG. Events in relay log files can now be inspected by
issuing SHOW RELAYLOG EVENTS [IN 'log_name'] [FROM pos] [LIMIT
[offset,] row_count].

mysql-test/extra/rpl_tests/rpl_show_relaylog_events.inc:
  Shared part of the test case.
mysql-test/include/show_binlog_events.inc:
  Added options $binary_log_file, $binary_log_limit_row, 
  $binary_log_limit_offset so that show_binlog_events can take 
  same parameters as SHOW BINLOG EVENTS does.
mysql-test/include/show_relaylog_events.inc:
  Clone of show_binlog_events for relaylog events.
mysql-test/suite/rpl/t/rpl_row_show_relaylog_events.test:
  Test case for row based replication.
mysql-test/suite/rpl/t/rpl_stm_mix_show_relaylog_events.test:
  Test case for statement and mixed mode replication.
sql/lex.h:
  Added RELAYLOG symbol.
sql/mysqld.cc:
  Added "show_relaylog_events" to status_vars.
sql/sp_head.cc:
  Set SQLCOM_SHOW_RELAYLOG_EVENTS to return flags=
  sp_head::MULTI_RESULTS; in sp_get_flags_for_command as
  SQLCOM_SHOW_BINLOG_EVENTS does.
sql/sql_lex.h:
  Added sql_command SQLCOM_SHOW_RELAYLOG_EVENTS to lex enum_sql_command.
sql/sql_parse.cc:
  Added handling of SQLCOM_SHOW_RELAYLOG_EVENTS.
sql/sql_repl.cc:
  mysql_show_binlog_events set to choose the log file to use based on
  the command issued (SHOW BINLOG|RELAYLOG EVENTS).
sql/sql_yacc.yy:
  Added RELAYLOG to the grammar.
2009-09-29 00:04:20 +01:00
unknown
c6186a2500 BUG #46572 DROP TEMPORARY table IF EXISTS does not have a consistent behavior in ROW mode
In RBR, 'DROP TEMPORARY TABLE IF EXISTS...' statement is binlogged when the table
does not exist.
      
In fact, 'DROP TEMPORARY TABLE ...' statement should never be binlogged in RBR
no matter if the table exists or not. 
This patch addresses this by checking whether we are dropping a
temporary table or not, when building the custom drop statement.
2009-09-28 10:23:06 +08:00
Luis Soares
a00bb75783 BUG#44661: rpl_ndb.rpl_ndb_circular_simplex fails because of
failure to cleanup of table

The test case was not dropping a table before exiting (ie, it was
not cleaning itself after execution). In this case, the warning
message stating that the test did not do a proper cleanup was
deterministic (which can be annoying).

I have found other tests cases on which mtr sporadically reports
that they have not cleaned up after execution:

 - rpl_ndb_circular
 - rpl_failed_optimize

In this case, the master was dropping a table but there was no
synchronization between the slave and the master.

This patch addresses the rpl_ndb_circular_simplex case by adding
the missing DROP table. The other cases are fixed by deploying
the missing sync_slave_with_master instruction.
2009-09-27 23:03:05 +01:00
unknown
09efe92a45 Bug #46931 rpl.rpl_get_master_version_and_clock fails on hpux11.31
Network error happened here, but it can be caused by CR_CONNECTION_ERROR, 
CR_CONN_HOST_ERROR, CR_SERVER_GONE_ERROR, CR_SERVER_LOST, ER_CON_COUNT_ERROR, 
and ER_SERVER_SHUTDOWN. We just check CR_SERVER_LOST here, so the test fails.

To fix the problem, check all errors that can be cause by the master shutdown.

mysql-test/extra/rpl_tests/rpl_get_master_version_and_clock.test:
  Added a 'if' sentence to check all errors that can be cause by the master shutdown.
mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_get_master_version_and_clock.result:
  Test result is updated duo to the patch of bug#46931
2009-09-27 17:00:29 +08:00
Mats Kindahl
124e830125 Bug #37221: SET AUTOCOMMIT=1 does not commit binary log
When setting AUTOCOMMIT=1 after starting a transaction, the binary log
did not commit the outstanding transaction. The reason was that the binary
log commit function saw the values of the new settings, deciding that there
were nothing to commit.

Fixed the problem by moving the implicit commit to before the thread option
flags were changed, so that the binary log sees the old values of the flags
instead of the values they will take after the statement.


mysql-test/extra/binlog_tests/implicit.test:
  New test file to check implicit commits both inside and outside transactions.
mysql-test/suite/binlog/t/binlog_implicit_commit.test:
  Test for implicit commit of SET AUTOCOMMIT and LOCK/UNLOCK TABLES.
sql/set_var.cc:
  Adding code to commit pending transaction before changing option flags.
2009-09-23 13:20:48 +02:00
Igor Babaev
c78dad1556 Applied the fix for bug #46931 from mysql-5.1 main trunk
to fix a failure in rpl_get_master_version_and_clock.test
2009-09-18 12:02:57 -07:00
Georgi Kodinov
4ac694822b automerge 2009-09-18 16:35:40 +03:00
unknown
e436b8866b BUG#45999 Row based replication fails when auto_increment field = 0
In RBR, There is an inconsistency between slaves and master.
When INSERT statement which includes an auto_increment field is executed,
Store engine of master will check the value of the auto_increment field. 
It will generate a sequence number and then replace the value, if its value is NULL or empty.
if the field's value is 0, the store engine will do like encountering the NULL values 
unless NO_AUTO_VALUE_ON_ZERO is set into SQL_MODE.
In contrast, if the field's value is 0, Store engine of slave always generates a new sequence number 
whether or not NO_AUTO_VALUE_ON_ZERO is set into SQL_MODE.

SQL MODE of slave sql thread is always consistency with master's.
Another variable is related to this bug.
If generateing a sequence number is decided by the values of
table->auto_increment_field_not_null and SQL_MODE(if includes MODE_NO_AUTO_VALUE_ON_ZERO)
The table->auto_increment_is_not_null is FALSE, which causes this bug to appear. ..
2009-09-10 18:05:53 +08:00
Sergey Petrunya
29f0dcb563 Merge MySQL->MariaDB
* Finished Monty and Jani's merge
* Some InnoDB tests still fail (because it's old xtradb code run against
  newer testsuite). They are expected to go after mergning with the latest
  xtradb.
2009-09-08 00:50:10 +04:00
unknown
1eb40ce319 BUG#45581 Test rpl_row_sp006_InnoDB fails randomly: Unknown database 'mysqltest1'
Essentially, Bug#45574 results in this bug. The 'CREATE DATABASE IF NOT EXISTS' statement was not 
binlogged, when the database has existed.
Sometimes, the master and slaves become inconsistent. The "CREATE DATABASE
IF NOT EXISTS mysqltest1" statement is not binlogged
if the db 'mysqltest1' existed before the test case is executed. 
So the db 'mysqltest1' can't be created on slave.
     
Patch of Bug#45574 has resolved this problem. 
But I think it is better to replace 'mysqltest1' by default db 'test'.
2009-09-04 09:33:45 +08:00