Fixed by backport of:
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 3402.50.156
committer: Jon Olav Hauglid <jon.hauglid@oracle.com>
branch nick: mysql-trunk-test
timestamp: Wed 2012-02-08 14:10:23 +0100
message:
Bug#13417754 ASSERT IN ROW_DROP_DATABASE_FOR_MYSQL DURING DROP SCHEMA
This assert could be triggered if an InnoDB table was being moved
to a different database using ALTER TABLE ... RENAME, while this
database concurrently was being dropped by DROP DATABASE.
The reason for the problem was that no metadata lock was taken
on the target database by ALTER TABLE ... RENAME.
DROP DATABASE was therefore not blocked and could remove
the database while ALTER TABLE ... RENAME was executing. This
could cause the assert in InnoDB to be triggered.
This patch fixes the problem by taking a IX metadata lock on
the target database before ALTER TABLE ... RENAME starts
moving a table to a different database.
Note that this problem did not occur with RENAME TABLE which
already takes the correct metadata locks.
Also note that this patch slightly changes the behavior of
ALTER TABLE ... RENAME. Before, the statement would abort and
return an error if a lock on the target table name could not
be taken immediately. With this patch, ALTER TABLE ... RENAME
will instead block and wait until the lock can be taken
(or until we get a lock timeout). This also means that it is
possible to get ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK errors in this situation
since we allow ALTER TABLE ... RENAME to wait and not just
abort immediately.
WHEN KILLING
Suppose there is a query waiting for a lock. If the user kills
this query, then "Got error -1 when reading table" error message
must not be logged in the server log file. Since this is a user
requested interruption, no spurious error message must be logged
in the server log. This patch will remove the error message from
the log.
approved by joh and tatjana
BY A CONCURRENT TRANSACTIO
The member function QUICK_RANGE_SELECT::init_ror_merged_scan() performs
a table handler clone. Innodb does not provide a clone operation.
The ha_innobase::clone() is not there. The handler::clone() does not
take care of the ha_innobase->prebuilt->select_lock_type. Because of
this what happens is that for one index we do a locking read, and
for the other index we were doing a non-locking (consistent) read.
The patch introduces ha_innobase::clone() member function.
It is implemented similar to ha_myisam::clone(). It calls the
base class handler::clone() and then does any additional operation
required. I am setting the ha_innobase->prebuilt->select_lock_type
correctly.
rb://1060 approved by Marko
Bug#13639204 64111: CRASH ON SELECT SUBQUERY WITH NON UNIQUE INDEX
The crash happened due to wrong calculation
of key length during creation of reference for
sort order index. The problem is that
keyuse->used_tables can have OUTER_REF_TABLE_BIT enabled
but used_tables parameter(create_ref_for_key() func) does
not have it. So key parts which have OUTER_REF_TABLE_BIT
are ommited and it could lead to incorrect key length
calculation(zero key length).
Fix the calculation of the next autoinc value when offset > 1. Some of the
results have changed due to the changes in the allocation calculation. The
new calculation will result in slightly bigger gaps for bulk inserts.
rb://866 Approved by Jimmy Yang.
Backported from mysql-trunk (5.6)
There are two threads. In one thread, dml operation is going on
involving cascaded update operation. In another thread, alter
table add foreign key constraint is happening. Under these
circumstances, it is possible for the dml thread to access a
dict_foreign_t object that has been freed by the ddl thread.
The debug sync test case provides the sequence of operations.
Without fix, the test case will crash the server (because of
newly added assert). With fix, the alter table stmt will return
an error message.
Backporting the fix from MySQL 5.5 to 5.1
rb:961
rb:947
There are two threads. In one thread, dml operation is going on
involving cascaded update operation. In another thread, alter
table add foreign key constraint is happening. Under these
circumstances, it is possible for the dml thread to access a
dict_foreign_t object that has been freed by the ddl thread.
The debug sync test case provides the sequence of operations.
Without fix, the test case will crash the server (because of
newly added assert). With fix, the alter table stmt will return
an error message.
rb:947
approved by Jimmy Yang
The actual Bug#11754376 does not exist in MySQL 5.5 because at startup
we drop entries for temporary tables from InnoDB dictionary cache (only
if ROW_FORMAT is not REDUNDANT). But nevertheless the bug in
normalize_table_name_low() is present so we fix it.
GRACEFUL SHUTDOWN
During startup mysql picks up .frm files from the tmpdir directory and
tries to drop those tables in the storage engine.
The problem is that when tmpdir ends in / then ha_innobase::delete_table()
is passed a string like "/var/tmp//#sql123", then it wrongly normalizes it
to "/#sql123" and calls row_drop_table_for_mysql() which of course fails
to delete the table entry from the InnoDB dictionary cache.
ha_innobase::delete_table() returns an error but nevertheless mysql wipes
away the .frm file and the entry in the InnoDB dictionary cache remains
orphaned with no easy way to remove it.
The "no easy" way to remove it is to create a similar temporary table again,
copy its .frm file to tmpdir under "#sql123.frm" and restart mysqld with
tmpdir=/var/tmp (no trailing slash) - this way mysql will pick the .frm file
after restart and will try to issue drop table for "/var/tmp/#sql123"
(notice do double slash), ha_innobase::delete_table() will normalize it to
"tmp/#sql123" and row_drop_table_for_mysql() will successfully remove the
table entry from the dictionary cache.
The solution is to fix normalize_table_name_low() to normalize things like
"/var/tmp//table" correctly to "tmp/table".
This patch also adds a test function which invokes
normalize_table_name_low() with various inputs to make sure it works
correctly and a mtr test that calls this test function.
Reviewed by: Marko (http://bur03.no.oracle.com/rb/r/929/)
ISSUES WITH COPYING PARTITIONED INNODB TABLES FROM LINUX TO WINDOWS
This problem was already fixed in mysql-trunk as part of bug #11755924. I am
backporting the fix to mysql-5.1.
If we meet DB_TOO_MANY_CONCURRENT_TRXS during the execution tab_create_graph from row_create_table_for_mysql(), .ibd file for the table should be created already but was not deleted for the error handling.
rb:875 approved by Jimmy Yang
If we meet DB_TOO_MANY_CONCURRENT_TRXS during the execution tab_create_graph from row_create_table_for_mysql(), .ibd file for the table should be created already but was not deleted for the error handling.
rb:875 approved by Jimmy Yang
The counter handler_read_key (SSV::ha_read_key_count) is incremented
incorrectly.
The mysql server maintains a per thread system_status_var (SSV)
object. This object contains among other things the counter
SSV::ha_read_key_count. The purpose of this counter is to measure the
number of requests to read a row based on a key (or the number of
index lookups).
This counter was wrongly incremented in the
ha_innobase::innobase_get_index(). The fix removes
this increment statement (for both innodb and innodb_plugin).
The various callers of the innobase_get_index() was checked to
determine if anybody must increment this counter (if they first call
innobase_get_index() and then perform an index lookup). It was found
that no caller of innobase_get_index() needs to worry about the
SSV::ha_read_key_count counter.
I manually checked that all the conflicting InnoDB changes are in 5.5 already.
Two things I am not sure about - I commented them with XXX in this patch.
I will further check with the authors of the changesets whether these things
should be present or not.
a.k.a. Bug#7975 deadlock without any locking, simple select and update
Bug#7975 was reintroduced when the storage engine API was made
pluggable in MySQL 5.1. Instead of looking at thd->lex directly, we
rely on handler::extra(). But, we were looking at the wrong extra()
flag, and we were ignoring the TRX_DUP_REPLACE flag in places where we
should obey it.
innodb_replace.test: Add tests for hopefully all affected statement
types, so that bug should never ever resurface. This kind of tests
should have been added when fixing Bug#7975 in MySQL 5.0.3 in the
first place.
rb:806 approved by Sunny Bains
In the ON UPDATE CASCADE clause of FOREIGN KEY constraints, the
calculated update vector was not fully initialized. This bug was
introduced in the InnoDB Plugin when implementing support for
ROW_FORMAT=DYNAMIC.
Additionally, the data type information was not initialized, but
apparently it has never been needed in this case. Nevertheless, it is
not good programming practice to pass uninitialized values around.
calc_row_difference(): Declare the update field uninitialized in
Valgrind. Copy the data type information as well, except when the
field is SQL NULL. In the built-in InnoDB, initialize
ufield->extern_storage = FALSE (an initialization bug that had gone
unnoticed this far). The InnoDB Plugin and later have this flag to
dfield_t and have always initialized it properly.
row_ins_cascade_calc_update_vec(): Reduce the scope of some
pointers. Initialize orig_len. (This caused the bug in InnoDB Plugin
and later.)
row_ins_foreign_check_on_constraint(): Simplify a condition. Declare
the update vector uninitialized.
rb:771 approved by Jimmy Yang
This fix was accidentally pushed to mysql-5.1 after the 5.1.59 clone-off in
bzr revision id marko.makela@oracle.com-20110829081642-z0w992a0mrc62s6w
with the fix of Bug#12704861 Corruption after a crash during BLOB update
but not merged to mysql-5.5 and upwards.
In the Barracuda formats, the clustered index record no longer
contains a prefix of off-page columns. Because of this, the undo log
must contain these prefixes, so that purge and multi-versioning will
continue to work. However, this also means that an undo log record can
become too big to fit in an undo log page. (It is a limitation of the
undo log that undo records cannot span across multiple pages.)
In case the checks for undo log size fail when CREATE TABLE or CREATE
INDEX is executed, we need a fallback that blocks a modification
operation when the undo log record would exceed the maximum size.
trx_undo_free_last_page_func(): Renamed from trx_undo_free_page_in_rollback().
Define the trx_t parameter only in debug builds.
trx_undo_free_last_page(): Wrapper for trx_undo_free_last_page_func().
Pass the trx_t parameter only in debug builds.
trx_undo_truncate_end_func(): Renamed from trx_undo_truncate_end().
Define the trx_t parameter only in debug builds. Rewrite a for(;;) loop
as a while loop for clarity.
trx_undo_truncate_end(): Wrapper for from trx_undo_truncate_end_func().
Pass the trx_t parameter only in debug builds.
trx_undo_erase_page_end(): Return TRUE if the page was non-empty
to begin with. Refuse to erase empty pages.
trx_undo_report_row_operation(): If the page for which the undo log
was too big was empty, free the undo page and return DB_TOO_BIG_RECORD.
rb:749 approved by Inaam Rana
Also addressed issues in bug #11745133, where we could mark a table
corrupted instead of crashing the server when found a corrupted buffer/page
if the table created with innodb_file_per_table on.
HA_INNOBASE::UPDATE_ROW, TEMPORARY TABLE, TABLE LOCK".
Attempt to update an InnoDB temporary table under LOCK TABLES
led to assertion failure in both debug and production builds
if this temporary table was explicitly locked for READ. The
same scenario works fine for MyISAM temporary tables.
The assertion failure was caused by discrepancy between lock
that was requested on the rows of temporary table at LOCK TABLES
time and by update operation. Since SQL-layer requested a
read-lock at LOCK TABLES time InnoDB engine assumed that upcoming
statements which are going to be executed under LOCK TABLES will
only read table and therefore should acquire only S-lock.
An update operation broken this assumption by requesting X-lock.
Possible approaches to fixing this problem are:
1) Skip locking of temporary tables as locking doesn't make any
sense for connection-local objects.
2) Prohibit changing of temporary table locked by LOCK TABLES ...
READ.
Unfortunately both of these approaches have drawbacks which make
them unviable for stable versions of server.
So this patch takes another approach and changes code in such way
that LOCK TABLES for a temporary table will always request write
lock. In 5.1 version of this patch switch from read lock to write
lock is done inside of InnoDBs handler methods as doing it on
SQL-layer causes compatibility troubles with FLUSH TABLES WITH
READ LOCK.
