Commit graph

2018 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Sergei Golubchik
9a64d0794c 5.3 merge 2012-08-27 18:13:17 +02:00
Sergei Golubchik
f72a765997 5.2 merge.
two tests still fail:
  main.innodb_icp and main.range_vs_index_merge_innodb
  call records_in_range() with both range ends being open
  (which triggers an assert)
2012-08-22 16:45:25 +02:00
Sergei Golubchik
1fd8150a5b 5.1 merge
increase xtradb verson from 13.0 to 13.01
2012-08-22 16:13:54 +02:00
Sergei Golubchik
cefc30b166 merge with MySQL 5.1.65 2012-08-22 11:40:39 +02:00
Michael Widenius
60589aeee0 Next part of merge. See TODO for details 2012-08-14 17:23:34 +03:00
Sergey Petrunya
2b0f6ece7b Merge 5.5-main -> 5.5-show-explain 2012-07-25 20:53:49 +04:00
Sergey Petrunya
8950ed8fdd MDEV-298: SHOW EXPLAIN: Plan returned by SHOW EXPLAIN only contains 'Using temporary' ...
- Correct the way SHOW EXPLAIN code calculates 'need_order' parameter 
  for JOIN::print_explain(). 
  The calculation is still an approximation (see MDEV entry for details) (even EXPLAIN itself
  is wrong in certain cases), but now it's a better approximation than before.
2012-07-20 01:52:03 +04:00
Sergey Petrunya
89820b4202 Better comments. 2012-07-06 00:28:30 +04:00
Michael Widenius
aa67a198e8 automatic merge with 5.5 2012-06-27 17:22:23 +03:00
Igor Babaev
4a6a08309c Merge 5.5 -> 5.5-mwl248. 2012-06-26 11:37:48 -07:00
Michael Widenius
1999be8d4e Automatic merge with 5.5 2012-09-01 00:54:54 +03:00
unknown
0b93b444b6 Merged the fix for bug lp:944706, mdev-193 2012-06-19 15:06:45 +03:00
Sergey Petrunya
fb33db5608 MWL#182: Explain running statements
- Merge with current 5.5-main
2012-06-15 00:50:17 +04:00
Sergei Golubchik
0522307ed1 mysql-5.5 merge 2012-06-14 20:05:31 +02:00
Sergey Petrunya
950dc8022e MDEV-323: SHOW EXPLAIN: Plan produced by SHOW EXPLAIN loses 'UNION RESULT' line
- Make SHOW EXPLAIN code correctly print fake_select_lex: both in the case where 
  it has not yet been executed, and when it has been executed.
2012-06-07 21:19:22 +04:00
Sergey Petrunya
5eecea8caf MDEV-324: SHOW EXPLAIN: Plan produced by SHOW EXPLAIN for a query with TEMPTABLE view loses 'DERIVED' line
- Make SHOW EXPLAIN code take into account that st_select_lex object without joins can be
  a full-featured SELECTs which were already executed and cleaned up.
2012-06-07 19:55:22 +04:00
unknown
c2677de7ac Merge the fix for lp:944706, mdev-193 2012-06-06 22:26:40 +03:00
Michael Widenius
b889f69993 Fixed comment 2012-06-04 14:47:35 +03:00
Igor Babaev
27ab01243c Merge 2012-06-01 13:42:39 -07:00
Michael Widenius
83c02f3237 Increased the version number to 10.0
- Fixed code that was not ready for a major version number > 9
- Fixed test cases that assumed max major version number could be 9
Updated version number for depricated options (will be removed in a later commit)

VERSION:
  Version number 10.0.0
client/mysqlbinlog.cc:
  Added support for major version numbers > 9
cmake/mysql_version.cmake:
  Added support for version numbers that is 0
mysql-test/r/comments.result:
  Modified test to handle version number 100000
mysql-test/r/func_system.result:
  Modified test to handle version number 100000
mysql-test/r/log_state.result:
  Updated depricated error message
mysql-test/r/sp.result:
  Modified test to handle version number 100000
mysql-test/r/subselect4.result:
  Updated depricated error message
mysql-test/r/variables.result:
  Updated depricated error message
mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_conditional_comments.result:
  Modified test to handle version number 100000
mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_loaddatalocal.result:
  Modified test to handle version number 100000
mysql-test/suite/rpl/t/rpl_conditional_comments.test:
  Modified test to handle version number 100000
mysql-test/suite/rpl/t/rpl_loaddatalocal.test:
  Modified test to handle version number 100000
mysql-test/suite/sys_vars/r/debug_basic.result:
  Updated depricated error message
mysql-test/suite/sys_vars/r/engine_condition_pushdown_basic.result:
  Updated depricated error message
mysql-test/suite/sys_vars/r/log_basic.result:
  Updated depricated error message
mysql-test/suite/sys_vars/r/log_slow_queries_basic.result:
  Updated depricated error message
mysql-test/suite/sys_vars/r/multi_range_count_basic.result:
  Updated depricated error message
mysql-test/suite/sys_vars/r/rpl_recovery_rank_basic.result:
  Updated depricated error message
mysql-test/suite/sys_vars/r/sql_big_selects_func.result:
  Updated depricated error message
mysql-test/suite/sys_vars/r/sql_max_join_size_basic.result:
  Updated depricated error message
mysql-test/suite/sys_vars/r/sql_max_join_size_func.result:
  Updated depricated error message
mysql-test/t/comments.test:
  Modified test to handle version number 100000
mysql-test/t/file_contents.test:
  Modified test to handle version number 100000
mysql-test/t/func_system.test:
  Modified test to handle version number 100000
mysql-test/t/parser_not_embedded.test:
  Modified test to handle version number 100000
mysql-test/t/sp.test:
  Modified test to handle version number 100000
sql/mysqld.cc:
  Updated version number for depricated options (will be removed in a later commit)
sql/slave.cc:
  Modified test to handle version number 100000
  Better error messages
sql/sql_lex.cc:
  Modified test to handle version number 100000 in comment syntax
sql/sys_vars.cc:
  Updated version number for depricated options (will be removed in a later commit)
2012-05-31 22:39:11 +03:00
unknown
941018f8d1 Patch for mdev-287: CHEAP SQ: A query with subquery in SELECT list, EXISTS, inner joins takes hundreds times longer
Analysis:

The fix for lp:944706 introduces early subquery optimization.
While a subquery is being optimized some of its predicates may be
removed. In the test case, the EXISTS subquery is constant, and is
evaluated to TRUE. As a result the whole OR is TRUE, and thus the
correlated condition "b = alias1.b" is optimized away. The subquery
becomes non-correlated.

The subquery cache is designed to work only for correlated subqueries.
If constant subquery optimization is disallowed, then the constant
subquery is not evaluated, the subquery remains correlated, and its
execution is cached. As a result execution is fast.

However, when the constant subquery was optimized away, it was neither
cached by the subquery cache, nor it was cached by the internal subquery
caching. The latter was due to the fact that the subquery still appeared
as correlated to the subselect_XYZ_engine::exec methods, and they
re-executed the subquery on each call to Item_subselect::exec.

Solution:

The solution is to update the correlated status of the subquery after it has
been optimized. This status consists of:
- st_select_lex::is_correlated
- Item_subselect::is_correlated
- SELECT_LEX::uncacheable
- SELECT_LEX_UNIT::uncacheable
The status is updated by st_select_lex::update_correlated_cache(), and its
caller st_select_lex::optimize_unflattened_subqueries. The solution relies
on the fact that the optimizer already called
st_select_lex::update_used_tables() for each subquery. This allows to
efficiently update the correlated status of each subquery without walking
the whole subquery tree.

Notice that his patch is an improvement over MySQL 5.6 and older, where
subqueries are not pre-optimized, and the above analysis is not possible.
2012-05-30 00:18:53 +03:00
Igor Babaev
bf770c505e Merge. 2012-05-22 21:31:36 -07:00
Igor Babaev
055477ae52 Support of the extended syntax for ANALYZE. 2012-05-22 20:55:07 -07:00
unknown
da5214831d Fix for bug lp:944706, task MDEV-193
The patch enables back constant subquery execution during
query optimization after it was disabled during the development
of MWL#89 (cost-based choice of IN-TO-EXISTS vs MATERIALIZATION).

The main idea is that constant subqueries are allowed to be executed
during optimization if their execution is not expensive.

The approach is as follows:
- Constant subqueries are recursively optimized in the beginning of
  JOIN::optimize of the outer query. This is done by the new method
  JOIN::optimize_constant_subqueries(). This is done so that the cost
  of executing these queries can be estimated.
- Optimization of the outer query proceeds normally. During this phase
  the optimizer may request execution of non-expensive constant subqueries.
  Each place where the optimizer may potentially execute an expensive
  expression is guarded with the predicate Item::is_expensive().
- The implementation of Item_subselect::is_expensive has been extended
  to use the number of examined rows (estimated by the optimizer) as a
  way to determine whether the subquery is expensive or not.
- The new system variable "expensive_subquery_limit" controls how many
  examined rows are considered to be not expensive. The default is 100.

In addition, multiple changes were needed to make this solution work
in the light of the changes made by MWL#89. These changes were needed
to fix various crashes and wrong results, and legacy bugs discovered
during development.
2012-05-17 13:46:05 +03:00
Sergey Petrunya
34e9a4c1e2 Merge of recent changes in MWL#182 in 5.3 with {Merge of MWL#182 with 5.5} 2012-05-17 00:59:03 +04:00
Sergey Petrunya
dfbd777fd8 MWL#182: SHOW EXPLAIN: Merge 5.3->5.5 2012-05-16 19:20:00 +04:00
Sergey Petrunya
533e1d2845 MDEV-273: SHOW EXPLAIN: server crashes in JOIN::print_explain on a query with impossible WHERE
- It turns out, there is a case where the join is degenerate, but 
  join->table_count!= && join->tables_list!=NULL. Need to also check 
  if join->zero_result_cause!=NULL, too.

- There is a slight problem: The code sets
    zero_result_cause= "no matching row in const table"
  when NOT running EXPLAIN. The result is that SHOW EXPLAIN will show this line while 
  regular EXPLAIN will not.
2012-05-16 12:49:22 +04:00
Sergey Petrunya
382e81ca84 MDEV-270: SHOW EXPLAIN: server crashes in JOIN::print_explain on a query with
select tables optimized away
- Take into account, that for some degenerate joins instead of "join->table_count=0"
  the code sets "join->tables_list=0".
2012-05-15 15:56:50 +04:00
Sergey Petrunya
b3841ae9e4 MDEV-267: SHOW EXPLAIN: Server crashes in JOIN::print_explain on most of queries
- Make SHOW EXPLAIN code handle degenerate subquery cases (No tables, impossible where, etc)
2012-05-14 22:39:00 +04:00
Sergey Petrunya
6bce336624 MDEV-240: SHOW EXPLAIN: Assertion `this->optimized == 2' failed
- Fix the bug: SHOW EXPLAIN may hit a case where a join is partially 
  optimized.
- Change JOIN::optimized to use enum instead of numeric constants
2012-05-11 18:13:06 +04:00
Sergei Golubchik
431e042b5d c 2012-05-21 15:30:25 +02:00
Sergey Petrunya
6fae4447f0 # MDEV-239: Assertion `field_types == 0 ... ' failed in Protocol_text::store...
- Make all functions that produce parts of EXPLAIN output take 
  explain_flags as parameter, instead of looking into thd->lex->describe
2012-05-10 15:13:57 +04:00
Sergey Petrunya
cdc9a1172d MWL#182: Explain running statements:
Make SHOW EXPLAIN work for queries that do "Using temporary" and/or "Using filesort"
- Patch#1: Don't lose "Using temporary/filesort" in the SHOW EXPLAIN output.
2012-05-10 01:45:38 +05:30
Sergei Golubchik
44cf9ee5f7 5.3 merge 2012-05-04 07:16:38 +02:00
unknown
c04786d3e3 Fix bug lp:985667, MDEV-229
Analysis:

The reason for the wrong result is the interaction between constant
optimization (in this case 1-row table) and subquery optimization.

- First the outer query is optimized, and 'make_join_statistics' finds that
table t2 has one row, reads that row, and marks the whole table as constant.
This also means that all fields of t2 are constant.

- Next, we optimize the subquery in the end of the outer 'make_join_statistics'.
The field 'f2' is considered constant, with value '3'. The subquery predicate
is rewritten as the constant TRUE.

- The outer query execution detects early that the whole query result is empty
and calls 'return_zero_rows'. Since the query is with implicit grouping, we
have to produce one row with special values for the aggregates (depending on
each aggregate function), and NULL values for all non-aggregate fields.  This
function calls 'no_rows_in_result' to set each aggregate function to the
default value when it aggregates over an empty result, and then calls
'send_data', which in turn evaluates each Item in the SELECT list.

- When evaluation reaches the subquery predicate, it executes the subquery
with field 'f2' having a constant value '3', and the subquery produces the
incorrect result '7'.

Solution:

Implement Item::no_rows_in_result for all subquery predicates. In order to
make this work, it is also needed to make all val_* methods of all subquery
predicates respect the Item_subselect::forced_const flag. Otherwise subqueries
are executed anyways, and override the default value set by no_rows_in_result
with whatever result is produced from the subquery evaluation.
2012-04-27 12:59:17 +03:00
Sergey Petrunya
ca8aa3901c MWL#182: Explain running statements
- Code cleanup
2012-04-26 06:40:36 +05:30
Andrei Elkin
14de6de946 merge bug11754117-45670 fixes from 5.1. 2012-04-21 13:24:39 +03:00
Andrei Elkin
bf66e3ab63 merge bug11754117-45670 fixes from 5.1. 2012-04-21 13:24:39 +03:00
Tor Didriksen
11b2cf4f03 Backport 5.5=>5.1 Patch for Bug#13805127:
Stored program cache produces wrong result in same THD.
2012-04-18 13:14:05 +02:00
Tor Didriksen
d612986b36 Backport 5.5=>5.1 Patch for Bug#13805127:
Stored program cache produces wrong result in same THD.
2012-04-18 13:14:05 +02:00
Sergey Petrunya
8c4fc9ba75 MWL#182: Explain running statements: merge with 5.3-main 2012-04-13 14:01:15 -07:00
Sergei Golubchik
16c5c53fc2 mysql 5.5.23 merge 2012-04-10 08:28:13 +02:00
Rohit Kalhans
1a02c266d1 BUG#11765650 - 58637: MARK UPDATES THAT DEPEND ON ORDER OF TWO KEYS UNSAFE
Description: When the table has more than one unique or primary key, 
 INSERT... ON DUP KEY UPDATE statement is sensitive to the order in which
 the storage engines checks the keys. Depending on this order, the storage
 engine may determine different rows to mysql, and hence mysql can update
 different rows on master and slave.
      
 Solution: We mark INSERT...ON DUP KEY UPDATE on a table with more than on unique
 key as unsafe therefore the event will be logged in row format if it is available
 (ROW/MIXED). If only STATEMENT format is available, a warning will be thrown. 

mysql-test/suite/binlog/r/binlog_unsafe.result:
  Updated result file
mysql-test/suite/binlog/t/binlog_unsafe.test:
  Added test to check  for warning being thrown when the unsafe statement is executed
mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_known_bugs_detection.result:
  Updated result file
sql/share/errmsg-utf8.txt:
  Added new warning message
sql/sql_base.cc:
  check for tables in the query with more than one UNIQUE KEY and INSERT ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE, and mark such statements unsafe.
2012-03-30 18:35:53 +05:30
Rohit Kalhans
fe9352454f BUG#11765650 - 58637: MARK UPDATES THAT DEPEND ON ORDER OF TWO KEYS UNSAFE
Description: When the table has more than one unique or primary key, 
 INSERT... ON DUP KEY UPDATE statement is sensitive to the order in which
 the storage engines checks the keys. Depending on this order, the storage
 engine may determine different rows to mysql, and hence mysql can update
 different rows on master and slave.
      
 Solution: We mark INSERT...ON DUP KEY UPDATE on a table with more than on unique
 key as unsafe therefore the event will be logged in row format if it is available
 (ROW/MIXED). If only STATEMENT format is available, a warning will be thrown.
2012-03-30 18:35:53 +05:30
Tor Didriksen
ed41846161 Patch for Bug#13805127: Stored program cache produces wrong result in same THD.
Background:

  - as described in MySQL Internals Prepared Stored
    (http://forge.mysql.com/wiki/MySQL_Internals_Prepared_Stored),
    the Optimizer sometimes does destructive changes to the parsed
    LEX-object (Item-tree), which makes it impossible to re-use
    that tree for PS/SP re-execution.

  - in order to be able to re-use the Item-tree, the destructive
    changes are remembered and rolled back after the statement execution.

The problem, discovered by this bug, was that the objects representing
GROUP-BY clause did not restored after query execution. So, the GROUP-BY
part of the statement could not be properly re-initialized for re-execution
after destructive changes.

Those objects do not take part in the Item-tree, so they can not be saved
using the approach for Item-tree.

The fix is as follows:

  - introduce a new array in st_select_lex to store the original
    ORDER pointers, representing the GROUP-BY clause;

  - Initialize this array in fix_prepare_information().

  - restore the list of GROUP-BY items in reinit_stmt_before_use().
2012-03-29 15:07:54 +02:00
Tor Didriksen
71261282b1 Patch for Bug#13805127: Stored program cache produces wrong result in same THD.
Background:

  - as described in MySQL Internals Prepared Stored
    (http://forge.mysql.com/wiki/MySQL_Internals_Prepared_Stored),
    the Optimizer sometimes does destructive changes to the parsed
    LEX-object (Item-tree), which makes it impossible to re-use
    that tree for PS/SP re-execution.

  - in order to be able to re-use the Item-tree, the destructive
    changes are remembered and rolled back after the statement execution.

The problem, discovered by this bug, was that the objects representing
GROUP-BY clause did not restored after query execution. So, the GROUP-BY
part of the statement could not be properly re-initialized for re-execution
after destructive changes.

Those objects do not take part in the Item-tree, so they can not be saved
using the approach for Item-tree.

The fix is as follows:

  - introduce a new array in st_select_lex to store the original
    ORDER pointers, representing the GROUP-BY clause;

  - Initialize this array in fix_prepare_information().

  - restore the list of GROUP-BY items in reinit_stmt_before_use().
2012-03-29 15:07:54 +02:00
Sergei Golubchik
20e706689d mysql-5.5.22 merge
mysql-test/suite/innodb/t/group_commit_crash.test:
  remove autoincrement to avoid rbr being used for insert ... select
mysql-test/suite/innodb/t/group_commit_crash_no_optimize_thread.test:
  remove autoincrement to avoid rbr being used for insert ... select
mysys/my_addr_resolve.c:
  a pointer to a buffer is returned to the caller -> the buffer cannot be on the stack
mysys/stacktrace.c:
  my_vsnprintf() is ok here, in 5.5
2012-03-28 01:04:46 +02:00
unknown
ecbd868f58 Merged the implementation of MDEV-28 LIMIT ROWS EXAMINED into MariaDB 5.5. 2012-03-12 00:45:18 +02:00
unknown
8aebd44e0e Implementation of MDEV-28 LIMIT ROWS EXAMINED
https://mariadb.atlassian.net/browse/MDEV-28
  
This task implements a new clause LIMIT ROWS EXAMINED <num>
as an extention to the ANSI LIMIT clause. This extension
allows to limit the number of rows and/or keys a query
would access (read and/or write) during query execution.
2012-03-11 14:39:20 +02:00
MySQL Build Team
7a35cb9150 Updated/added copyright headers 2012-02-16 10:48:16 +01:00