For the query having an IN subquery with no tables, we were converting the subquery with an expression between
the left part and the select list of the subquery . This can give incorrect results when we have a condition
in the subquery with a dual table (as this is treated as a no table).
The fix is that we don't do this conversion when we have conds in the subquery with a dual table.
Make differentiation between pullout for merge and pulout of outer field during exists2in transformation.
In last case the field was outer and so we can safely start from name resolution context of the SELECT where it was pulled.
Old behavior lead to inconsistence between list of tables and outer name resolution context (which skips one SELECT for merge purposes) which creates problem vor name resolution.
Item_in_subselect::pushed_cond_guards[] array is allocated only when
left_expr->maybe_null. And it is used (for row expressions) when
left_expr->element_index(i)->maybe_null.
For left_expr being a multi-column subquery, its maybe_null is
always false when the subquery doesn't use tables (see
Item_singlerow_subselect::fix_length_and_dec()
and subselect_single_select_engine::fix_length_and_dec()),
otherwise it's always true.
But row elements can be NULL regardless, so let's always allocate
pushed_cond_guards for multi-column subqueries, no matter whether
its maybe_null was forced to true or false.
Significantly reduce the amount of InnoDB, XtraDB and Mariabackup
code changes by defining pfs_os_file_t as something that is
transparently compatible with os_file_t.
At some conditions the function opt_sum_query() can apply MIN/MAX
optimizations to to Item_sum objects of a select These optimizations
becomes invalid if this select is the subquery of an IN subquery
predicate that is converted to a EXISTS subquery. Thus in this case
the MIX/MAX optimizations that have been applied in opt_sum_query()
must be rolled back.
This bug appeared in 5.3 when the code for the cost base choice between
materialization and in-to-exists transformation of non-correlated
IN subqueries was introduced. Before this code in-to-exists
transformations were always performed before the call of opt_sum_query().
The code that blocked conversion of a IN subselect pedicate to a semi-join
if it occurred in the ON expression of an outer join did not do it correctly.
As a result, the conversion was blocked for IN subselect predicates
encountered in ON expressions of INNER joins or in WHERE conditions
of mergeable views / derived tables. This patch fixes this problem.
Also, implement MDEV-11027 a little differently from 5.5 and 10.0:
recv_apply_hashed_log_recs(): Change the return type back to void
(DB_SUCCESS was always returned).
Report progress also via systemd using sd_notifyf().
Also, implement MDEV-11027 a little differently from 5.5:
recv_sys_t::report(ib_time_t): Determine whether progress should
be reported.
recv_apply_hashed_log_recs(): Rename the parameter to last_batch.
As the function Item_subselect::fix_fields does it the function
Item_subselect::update_used_tables must ignore UNCACHEABLE_EXPLAIN
when deciding whether the subquery item should be considered as a
constant item.
SUBSELECT_UNION_ENGINE::NO_ROWS
This patch is specific for mysql-5.5
ISSUE: When max_join_size is used and union query
results in evaluation of tuples greater than
max_join_size, the join object is not created,
and is set to NULL.
However, this join object is further dereferenced
by union logic to determine if query resulted in
any number of rows being returned.
Since, the object is NULL, it results in
program terminating abnormally.
SOLUTION: Added check to verify if join object is created.
If join object is created, it will be used to
determine if query resulted in any number of rows.
Else, when join object is not created, we return
'false' indicating that there were no rows for the
query.
