it's incorrect to use change_item_tree() to replace arguments
of top-level AND/OR, because they (arguments) are stored in a List,
so a pointer to an argument is in the list_node, and individual
list_node's of top-level AND/OR can be deleted in Item_cond::build_equal_items().
In that case rollback_item_tree_changes() will modify the deleted object.
Luckily, it's not needed to use change_item_tree() for top-level
AND/OR, because the whole top-level item is copied and preserved
in prep_where and prep_on, and restored from there.
So, just don't.
Additionally to the test case in the commit it fixes
* ASAN failure of main.opt_tvc --ps
* ASAN failure of main.having_cond_pushdown --ps
Problem was the Item_field::Item_field(THD*, Field*) had old code
that put a null pointer in orig_field_names. Now, when we have
proper re-prepare if table definition changes, this is not needed
anymore.
