Commit graph

5 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Monty
92d2ceac73 MDEV-28285 Unexpected result when combining DISTINCT, subselect and LIMIT
The problem was that when  JOIN_TAB::remove_duplicates() noticed there
can only be one possible row in the output, it adjusted limits but
didn't take into account any possible offset.

Fixed by not adjusting limit offset when setting one-row-limit.
2023-05-23 09:16:36 +03:00
Sergei Petrunia
7259b299a5 MDEV-27382: OFFSET is ignored when combined with DISTINCT
A query in form

  SELECT DISTINCT expr_that_is_inferred_to_be_const LIMIT 0 OFFSET n

produces one row when it should produce none. The issue was in
JOIN_TAB::remove_duplicates() in the piece of logic that tried to
avoid duplicate removal for such cases but didn't account for possible
"LIMIT 0".

Fixed by making Select_limit_counters::set_limit() change OFFSET to 0
when LIMIT is 0.
2022-01-19 14:04:10 +03:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
ebeb4f93e8 MDEV-16327: Server doesn't account for engines that supports OFFSET on their own.
Engine get LIMIT/OFFSET info an can it use/reset.
2019-10-13 09:40:41 +02:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
1ae02f0e0d MDEV-18553: MDEV-16327 pre-requisits part 2: uniform of LIMIT/OFFSET handling
Now both offset and limit are stored and do not chenged during execution
(offset is decreased during processing in versions before 10.5).

(Big part of this changes made by Monty)
2019-10-13 09:40:41 +02:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
eb0804ef5e MDEV-18553: MDEV-16327 pre-requisits part 1: isolation of LIMIT/OFFSET handling 2019-10-13 09:40:41 +02:00