too much memory. Instead, either create the equvalent SEL_TREE manually, or create only two ranges that
strictly include the area to scan
(Note: just to re-iterate: increasing NOT_IN_IGNORE_THRESHOLD will make optimization run slower for big
IN-lists, but the server will not run out of memory. O(N^2) memory use has been eliminated)
The fix refines the algorithm of generating DROPs for binlog.
Temp tables with common pseudo_thread_id are clustered into one query.
Consequently one replication event per pseudo_thread_id is generated.
Backporting a changeset made for 5.0. Comments from there:
The fix refines the algorithm of generating DROPs for binlog.
Temp tables with common pseudo_thread_id are clustered into one query.
Consequently one replication event per pseudo_thread_id is generated.
Error was emitted when one tried to select information from view which used
merge algorithm and which also had CONVERT_TZ() function in its select list.
This bug was caused by wrong assumption that global table list for view
which is handled using merge algorithm begins from tables belonging to
the main select of this view. Nowadays the above assumption is not true only
when one uses convert_tz() function in view's select list, but in future
other cases may be added (for example we may support merging of views
with subqueries in select list one day). Relying on this false assumption
led to the usage of wrong table list for field lookups and therefor errors.
With this fix we explicitly use pointer to the beginning of main select's
table list.
The bug caused wrong result sets for union constructs of the form
(SELECT ... ORDER BY order_list1 [LIMIT n]) ORDER BY order_list2.
For such queries order lists were concatenated and limit clause was
completely neglected.
Bug #15684: @@version_* are not all SELECTable
Added the appropriate information as read-only system variables, and
also removed some special-case handling of @@version along the way.
@@version_bdb was added, but isn't included in the test because it
depends on the presence of BDB.
The SQL standard doesn't allow to use in HAVING clause fields that are not
present in GROUP BY clause and not under any aggregate function in the HAVING
clause. However, mysql allows using such fields. This extension assume that
the non-grouping fields will have the same group-wise values. Otherwise, the
result will be unpredictable. This extension allowed in strict
MODE_ONLY_FULL_GROUP_BY sql mode results in misunderstanding of HAVING
capabilities.
The new error message ER_NON_GROUPING_FIELD_USED message is added. It says
"non-grouping field '%-.64s' is used in %-.64s clause". This message is
supposed to be used for reporting errors when some field is not found in the
GROUP BY clause but have to be present there. Use cases for this message are
this bug and when a field is present in a SELECT item list not under any
aggregate function and there is GROUP BY clause present which doesn't mention
that field. It renders the ER_WRONG_FIELD_WITH_GROUP error message obsolete as
being more descriptive.
The resolve_ref_in_select_and_group() function now reports the
ER_NON_GROUPING_FIELD_FOUND error if the strict mode is set and the field for
HAVING clause is found in the SELECT item list only.
