Commit graph

351 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
bcd47f4148 Bug #56662 Assertion failed: next_insert_id == 0, file .\handler.cc
Normally, auto_increment value is generated for the column by
inserting either NULL or 0 into it. NO_AUTO_VALUE_ON_ZERO
suppresses this behavior for 0 so that only NULL generates
the auto_increment value. This behavior is also followed by
a slave, specifically by the SQL Thread, when applying events
in the statement format from a master. However, when applying
events in the row format, the flag was ignored thus causing
an assertion failure:
"Assertion failed: next_insert_id == 0, file .\handler.cc"
      
In fact, we never need to generate a auto_increment value for
the column when applying events in row format on slave. So we
don't allow it to happen by using 'MODE_NO_AUTO_VALUE_ON_ZERO'.
      
Refactoring: Get rid of all the sql_mode checks to rows_log_event
when applying it for avoiding problems caused by the inconsistency
of the sql_mode on slave and master as the sql_mode is not set for
Rows_log_event.
2010-12-21 18:23:20 +08:00
16ca2deb90 Bug #56662 Assertion failed: next_insert_id == 0, file .\handler.cc
Normally, auto_increment value is generated for the column by
inserting either NULL or 0 into it. NO_AUTO_VALUE_ON_ZERO
suppresses this behavior for 0 so that only NULL generates
the auto_increment value. This behavior is also followed by
a slave, specifically by the SQL Thread, when applying events
in the statement format from a master. However, when applying
events in the row format, the flag was ignored thus causing
an assertion failure:
"Assertion failed: next_insert_id == 0, file .\handler.cc"

In fact, we never need to generate a auto_increment value for
the column when applying events in row format on slave. So we
don't allow it to happen by using 'MODE_NO_AUTO_VALUE_ON_ZERO'.

Refactoring: Get rid of all the sql_mode checks to rows_log_event
when applying it for avoiding problems caused by the inconsistency
of the sql_mode on slave and master as the sql_mode is not set for
Rows_log_event.
2010-12-21 12:47:22 +08:00
Alfranio Correia
c26c9b805e BUG#56343 binlog_cache_use status is bigger than expected
The binlog_cache_use is incremented twice when changes to a transactional table
are committed, i.e. TC_LOG_BINLOG::log_xid calls is called. The problem happens
because log_xid calls both binlog_flush_stmt_cache and binlog_flush_trx_cache
without checking if such caches are empty thus unintentionally increasing the
binlog_cache_use value twice.

Although not explicitly mentioned in the bug, the binlog_cache_disk_use presents
the same problem.

The binlog_cache_use and binlog_cache_disk_use are status variables that are
incremented when transactional (i.e. trx-cache) or non-transactional (i.e.
stmt-cache) changes are committed. They are used to compute the ratio between
the use of disk and memory while gathering updates for a transaction.

The problem reported is fixed by avoiding incrementing the binlog_cache_use
and binlog_cache_disk_use if a cache is empty. We also have decided to increment
both variables when a cache is truncated as the cache is used although its
content is discarded and is not written to the binary log.

In this patch, we take the opportunity to re-organize the code around the
function binlog_flush_trx_cache and binlog_flush_stmt_cache.
2010-11-05 13:58:05 +00:00
Davi Arnaut
69aea87d5f Merge of mysql-5.1-bugteam into mysql-5.5-bugteam. 2010-10-19 20:51:34 -02:00
Davi Arnaut
39e9bde2c0 Bug#45288: pb2 returns a lot of compilation warnings
Tag or remove unused arguments and variables.
2010-10-19 20:36:59 -02:00
Luis Soares
a7dc817904 Automerge from mysql-5.1-bugteam into mysql-5.5-bugteam. 2010-10-13 11:08:39 +01:00
Luis Soares
5109d5401e BUG#38718: slave sql thread crashes when reading relay log
Suprisingly, a Slave_log_event would show up in the binary
log. This event is never used and should not appear in the
logs. As such, when the slave (or the mysqlbinlog tool) reads the
event, it will hit an invalid pointer (reference to the
descriptor event when deserializing the Slave_log_event was
purposodely set to NULL).
      
The presence of the Slave_log_event denotes a corrupted log, but
we cannot tell how the log got corrupted in the first
place. However, we can make the server cope with such events when
it reads them - in case of log corruption - and fail gracefully.
     
This patch makes the server/mysqlbinlog to report that it has
found an invalid log event when Slave_log_event is read.
2010-10-06 12:23:46 +01:00
Alfranio Correia
0be27d8f1c BUG#56343 binlog_cache_use status is bigger than expected
The binlog_cache_use is incremented twice when changes to a transactional table
are committed, i.e. TC_LOG_BINLOG::log_xid calls is called. The problem happens
because log_xid calls both binlog_flush_stmt_cache and binlog_flush_trx_cache
without checking if such caches are empty thus unintentionally increasing the
binlog_cache_use value twice.

To fix the problem we avoided incrementing the binlog_cache_use if the cache is
empty. We also decided to increment binlog_cache_use when the cache is truncated
as the cache is used although its content is discarded and is not written to the
binary log.

Note that binlog_cache_use is incremented for both types of cache, transactional
and non-transactional and that the behavior presented in this patch also applies
to the binlog_cache_disk_use.

Finally, we re-organized the code around the functions binlog_flush_trx_cache and
binlog_flush_stmt_cache.
2010-10-06 09:34:49 +01:00
Davi Arnaut
649390ac81 Merge of mysql-trunk-bugfixing into mysql-trunk-merge. 2010-07-15 10:47:50 -03:00
Davi Arnaut
a10ae35328 Bug#34043: Server loops excessively in _checkchunk() when safemalloc is enabled
Essentially, the problem is that safemalloc is excruciatingly
slow as it checks all allocated blocks for overrun at each
memory management primitive, yielding a almost exponential
slowdown for the memory management functions (malloc, realloc,
free). The overrun check basically consists of verifying some
bytes of a block for certain magic keys, which catches some
simple forms of overrun. Another minor problem is violation
of aliasing rules and that its own internal list of blocks
is prone to corruption.

Another issue with safemalloc is rather the maintenance cost
as the tool has a significant impact on the server code.
Given the magnitude of memory debuggers available nowadays,
especially those that are provided with the platform malloc
implementation, maintenance of a in-house and largely obsolete
memory debugger becomes a burden that is not worth the effort
due to its slowness and lack of support for detecting more
common forms of heap corruption.

Since there are third-party tools that can provide the same
functionality at a lower or comparable performance cost, the
solution is to simply remove safemalloc. Third-party tools
can provide the same functionality at a lower or comparable
performance cost. 

The removal of safemalloc also allows a simplification of the
malloc wrappers, removing quite a bit of kludge: redefinition
of my_malloc, my_free and the removal of the unused second
argument of my_free. Since free() always check whether the
supplied pointer is null, redudant checks are also removed.

Also, this patch adds unit testing for my_malloc and moves
my_realloc implementation into the same file as the other
memory allocation primitives.
2010-07-08 18:20:08 -03:00
fe6ab9a06b Manul merge 2010-07-04 12:36:09 +08:00
42eecc539a The following statements support the CURRENT_USER() where a user is needed.
DROP USER 
RENAME USER CURRENT_USER() ...
GRANT ... TO CURRENT_USER()
REVOKE ... FROM CURRENT_USER()
ALTER DEFINER = CURRENT_USER() EVENTbut, When these statements are binlogged, CURRENT_USER() just is binlogged
as 'CURRENT_USER()', it is not expanded to the real user name. When slave 
executes the log event, 'CURRENT_USER()' is expand to the user of slave 
SQL thread, but SQL thread's user name always NULL. This breaks the replication.

After this patch, session's user will be written into query log events 
if these statements call CURREN_USER() or 'ALTER EVENT' does not assign a definer.
2010-07-04 12:02:49 +08:00
Davi Arnaut
8675070131 Merge of mysql-5.1-bugteam into mysql-trunk-merge. 2010-06-28 19:18:22 -03:00
Davi Arnaut
1b504ab0b1 Revert Bug#48321 due to build breakage and failing tests. 2010-06-28 17:59:41 -03:00
c943bc7bbb Manual merge 2010-06-27 13:51:45 +08:00
899a1d694f The following statements support the CURRENT_USER() where a user is needed.
DROP USER 
RENAME USER CURRENT_USER() ...
GRANT ... TO CURRENT_USER()
REVOKE ... FROM CURRENT_USER()
ALTER DEFINER = CURRENT_USER() EVENTbut, When these statements are binlogged, CURRENT_USER() just is binlogged
as 'CURRENT_USER()', it is not expanded to the real user name. When slave 
executes the log event, 'CURRENT_USER()' is expand to the user of slave 
SQL thread, but SQL thread's user name always NULL. This breaks the replication.

After this patch, session's user will be written into query log events 
if these statements call CURREN_USER() or 'ALTER EVENT' does not assign a definer.
2010-06-27 12:42:06 +08:00
Alexander Nozdrin
4e633ec234 Auto-merge from mysql-trunk. 2010-05-28 09:47:58 +04:00
Alexey Kopytov
e47ab5a604 Manual merge from mysql-5.1-bugteam to mysql-trunk-merge.
Text conflict in sql/log.cc
Text conflict in sql/log.h
Text conflict in sql/sql_class.cc
Text conflict in sql/sql_load.cc
2010-05-11 12:23:57 +04:00
He Zhenxing
455f754e6b Bug#53189 Table map version unused and can be removed
MYSQL_BIN_LOG m_table_map_version member and it's associated 
functions were not used in the logic of binlogging and replication,
this patch removed all related code.
2010-05-08 11:25:33 +08:00
Konstantin Osipov
8280fdd3c3 Committing on behalf or Dmitry Lenev:
Fix for bug #46947 "Embedded SELECT without FOR UPDATE is
causing a lock", with after-review fixes.

SELECT statements with subqueries referencing InnoDB tables
were acquiring shared locks on rows in these tables when they
were executed in REPEATABLE-READ mode and with statement or
mixed mode binary logging turned on.

This was a regression which were introduced when fixing
bug 39843.

The problem was that for tables belonging to subqueries
parser set TL_READ_DEFAULT as a lock type. In cases when
statement/mixed binary logging at open_tables() time this
type of lock was converted to TL_READ_NO_INSERT lock at
open_tables() time and caused InnoDB engine to acquire
shared locks on reads from these tables. Although in some
cases such behavior was correct (e.g. for subqueries in
DELETE) in case of SELECT it has caused unnecessary locking.

This patch tries to solve this problem by rethinking our
approach to how we handle locking for SELECT and subqueries.
Now we always set TL_READ_DEFAULT lock type for all cases
when we read data. When at open_tables() time this lock
is interpreted as TL_READ_NO_INSERT or TL_READ depending
on whether this statement as a whole or call to function
which uses particular table should be written to the
binary log or not (if yes then statement should be properly
serialized with concurrent statements and stronger lock
should be acquired).

Test coverage is added for both InnoDB and MyISAM.

This patch introduces an "incompatible" change in locking
scheme for subqueries used in SELECT ... FOR UPDATE and
SELECT .. IN SHARE MODE.
In 4.1 the server would use a snapshot InnoDB read for 
subqueries in SELECT FOR UPDATE and SELECT .. IN SHARE MODE
statements, regardless of whether the binary log is on or off.
If the user required a different type of read (i.e. locking read),
he/she could request so explicitly by providing FOR UPDATE/IN SHARE MODE
clause for each individual subquery.
On of the patches for 5.0 broke this behaviour (which was not documented
or tested), and started to use locking reads fora all subqueries in SELECT ... 
FOR UPDATE/IN SHARE MODE. This patch restored 4.1 behaviour.
2010-04-28 14:04:11 +04:00
Alexey Kopytov
ee09f97211 Manual merge of mysql-5.1-bugteam to
mysql-trunk-merge.

Conflicts:

Text conflict in sql/sql_priv.h
2010-04-19 16:09:44 +04:00
Alexey Kopytov
7320a95808 Manual merge of mysql-5.1-bugteam into mysql-trunk-merge.
Conflicts:

Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/binlog/r/binlog_row_mix_innodb_myisam.result
Text conflict in sql/log.cc
Text conflict in sql/set_var.cc
Text conflict in sql/sql_class.cc
2010-04-03 21:35:51 +04:00
Mats Kindahl
e409d6f69c WL#5030: Split and remove mysql_priv.h
This patch:

- Moves all definitions from the mysql_priv.h file into
  header files for the component where the variable is
  defined
- Creates header files if the component lacks one
- Eliminates all include directives from mysql_priv.h
- Eliminates all circular include cycles
- Rename time.cc to sql_time.cc
- Rename mysql_priv.h to sql_priv.h
2010-03-31 16:05:33 +02:00
2049d1afc0 Bug #50407 mysqlbinlog --database=X produces bad output for SAVEPOINTs
When mysqlbinlog was given the --database=X flag, it always printed
'ROLLBACK TO', but the corresponding 'SAVEPOINT' statement was not
printed. The replicated filter(replicated-do/ignore-db) and binlog
filter (binlog-do/ignore-db) has the same problem. They are solved
in this patch together.

After this patch, We always check whether the query is 'SAVEPOINT'
statement or not. Because this is a literal check, 'SAVEPOINT' and
'ROLLBACK TO' statements are also binlogged in uppercase with no
any comments.

The binlog before this patch can be handled correctly except one case
that any comments are in front of the keywords. for example:
 /* bla bla */ SAVEPOINT a;
 /* bla bla */ ROLLBACK TO a;
2010-03-28 19:57:33 +08:00
Mats Kindahl
c14807a21a Merging with mysql-5.1-bugteam 2010-03-17 19:15:41 +01:00
Mats Kindahl
2773758986 BUG#49618: Field length stored incorrectly in binary log
for InnoDB
            
The class Field_bit_as_char stores the metadata for the
field incorrecly because bytes_in_rec and bit_len are set
to (field_length + 7 ) / 8 and 0 respectively, while
Field_bit has the correct values field_length / 8 and
field_length % 8.
            
Solved the problem by re-computing the values for the
metadata based on the field_length instead of using the
bytes_in_rec and bit_len variables.
            
To handle compatibility with old server, a table map
flag was added to indicate that the bit computation is
exact. If the flag is clear, the slave computes the
number of bytes required to store the bit field and
compares that instead, effectively allowing replication
*without conversion* from any field length that require
the same number of bytes to store.
2010-03-17 15:28:49 +01:00
Luis Soares
f7ebf26881 auto merge from mysql-5.1-rep+3. 2010-02-09 12:10:47 +00:00
Alexander Nozdrin
ddc8765a9e Manual merge from mysql-trunk-merge.
Conflicts:
  - mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_binlog_grant.result
  - mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_sp.result
  - mysql-test/suite/rpl/t/rpl_binlog_grant.test
  - sql/sql_parse.cc
  - sql/sql_table.cc
  - sql/sql_test.cc
2010-01-31 01:06:50 +03:00
Andrei Elkin
67b8cb0d1f bug#47142
merging patches prepared for 5.0 to 5.1-bt. That caused a few changes in the test file
2010-01-27 19:27:49 +02:00
Andrei Elkin
f13ebe1252 bug#47142
improving comments
2010-01-27 15:20:03 +02:00
Andrei Elkin
1c0056b3ba Bug #47142 "slave start until" stops 1 event too late in 4.1 to 5.0 replication
When replicating from 4.1 master to 5.0 slave START SLAVE UNTIL can stop too late.
The necessary in calculating of the beginning of an event the event's length
did not correspond to the master's genuine information at the event's execution time.
That piece of info was changed at the event's relay-logging due to binlog_version<4 event
conversion by IO thread.

Fixed with storing the master genuine Query_log_event size into a new status
variable at relay-logging of the event. The stored info is extacted at the event
execution and participate further to caclulate the correct start position of the event
in the until-pos stopping routine.
The new status variable's algorithm will be only active when the event comes
from the master of version < 5.0 (binlog_version < 4).
2010-01-25 17:46:48 +02:00
7a8ab5f4bc Auto Merge from 5.1-rep+2 2010-01-20 11:36:41 +08:00
Luis Soares
14d959f7ff BUG#49562: SBR out of sync when using numeric data types + user
variable

The User_var_log_event was not serializing the unsigned
flag. This would cause the slave to always assume signed values.

We fix this by extending the User_var_log_event to also contain
information on the unsigned_flag, meaning that it gets into the
binlog as well, therefore the slave will get this information as
well. Events without information on unsigned flag (old events)
are treated as they were before (always signed: unsigned_flag=
FALSE).

The information on the unsigned_flag, is shipped in an extra byte
appended to the end of the User_var_log_event and added by this
patch. This extra byte holds values for general purpose
User_var_log_event flags which are now packed in the binlog as
well. One of these flags contains information about whether the
value is signed or unsigned (currently this extra byte is only
used to hold data on the unsigned flag, in the future we can use
it to pack extra flags if there is the need to).
2010-01-15 17:52:46 +00:00
Alfranio Correia
46d1689b7c merge mysql-next-mr --> mysql-5.1-rpl-merge
Conflicts:
  Text conflict in sql/log.cc
  Text conflict in sql/slave.cc
  Text conflict in sql/sql_base.cc
2010-01-13 12:22:34 +00:00
Alfranio Correia
6f7929b143 merge mysql-5.1-rep+2-delivery1 --> mysql-5.1-rpl-merge
Conflicts:

Text conflict in .bzr-mysql/default.conf
Text conflict in mysql-test/extra/rpl_tests/rpl_loaddata.test
Text conflict in mysql-test/r/mysqlbinlog2.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/binlog/r/binlog_stm_mix_innodb_myisam.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/binlog/r/binlog_unsafe.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_insert_id.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_loaddata.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_stm_auto_increment_bug33029.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_udf.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/t/rpl_slow_query_log.test
Text conflict in sql/field.h
Text conflict in sql/log.cc
Text conflict in sql/log_event.cc
Text conflict in sql/log_event_old.cc
Text conflict in sql/mysql_priv.h
Text conflict in sql/share/errmsg.txt
Text conflict in sql/sp.cc
Text conflict in sql/sql_acl.cc
Text conflict in sql/sql_base.cc
Text conflict in sql/sql_class.h
Text conflict in sql/sql_db.cc
Text conflict in sql/sql_delete.cc
Text conflict in sql/sql_insert.cc
Text conflict in sql/sql_lex.cc
Text conflict in sql/sql_lex.h
Text conflict in sql/sql_load.cc
Text conflict in sql/sql_table.cc
Text conflict in sql/sql_update.cc
Text conflict in sql/sql_view.cc
Conflict adding files to storage/innobase.  Created directory.
Conflict because storage/innobase is not versioned, but has versioned children.  Versioned directory.
Conflict adding file storage/innobase.  Moved existing file to storage/innobase.moved.
Conflict adding files to storage/innobase/handler.  Created directory.
Conflict because storage/innobase/handler is not versioned, but has versioned children.  Versioned directory.
Contents conflict in storage/innobase/handler/ha_innodb.cc
2010-01-07 15:39:11 +00:00
Marc Alff
a4c3bc618b WL#2360 Performance schema
Part IV: sql instrumentation
2010-01-06 22:42:07 -07:00
Alfranio Correia
3476b15af9 merge mysql-5.1-rep+3 --> mysql-5.1-rep+2-delivery1 2009-12-17 21:43:35 +00:00
Alexey Kopytov
efe6195858 Manual merge of mysql-5.1-bugteam into mysql-trunk-merge. 2009-12-16 16:47:07 +03:00
Mats Kindahl
2511f3c4b3 Merging with mysql-5.1-rep+2 2009-12-15 21:21:00 +01:00
Mats Kindahl
f43ca0254e BUG#49618: Field length stored incorrectly in binary log
for InnoDB

The class Field_bit_as_char stores the metadata for the
field incorrecly because bytes_in_rec and bit_len are set
to (field_length + 7 ) / 8 and 0 respectively, while
Field_bit has the correct values field_length / 8 and
field_length % 8.

Solved the problem by re-computing the values for the
metadata based on the field_length instead of using the
bytes_in_rec and bit_len variables.

To handle compatibility with old server, a table map
flag was added to indicate that the bit computation is
exact. If the flag is clear, the slave computes the
number of bytes required to store the bit field and
compares that instead, effectively allowing replication
*without conversion* from any field length that require
the same number of bytes to store.
2009-12-15 16:11:44 +01:00
aa38825287 Bug #34628 LOAD DATA CONCURRENT INFILE drops CONCURRENT in binary log
'LOAD DATA CONCURRENT [LOCAL] INFILE ...' statment only is binlogged as
'LOAD DATA [LOCAL] INFILE ...' in SBR and MBR.  As a result, if replication is on, 
queries on slaves will be blocked by the replication SQL thread.

This patch write code to write 'CONCURRENT' into the log event if 'CONCURRENT' option
is in the original statement in SBR and MBR.
2009-12-15 13:14:14 +08:00
Andrei Elkin
d09bded416 merging 5.1 main -> 5.1-rep+2 -> 5.1-rep+3; binlog_unsafe , rpl_mysql_upgrade fail and are under treatment 2009-11-10 20:45:15 +02:00
Andrei Elkin
69d6fcbd3b merging 5.1 main -> rpl+2. Some manual work required mostly due to bug46640 2009-11-06 18:35:04 +02:00
Alfranio Correia
60d4662496 WL#2687 WL#5072 BUG#40278 BUG#47175
Non-transactional updates that take place inside a transaction present problems
for logging because they are visible to other clients before the transaction
is committed, and they are not rolled back even if the transaction is rolled
back. It is not always possible to log correctly in statement format when both
transactional and non-transactional tables are used in the same transaction.

In the current patch, we ensure that such scenario is completely safe under the
ROW and MIXED modes.
2009-11-03 19:02:56 +00:00
Luis Soares
58e2fde011 manual merge: mysql-5.1-rep+2-delivery1 --> mysql-5.1-rpl-merge
Conflicts
=========

Text conflict in .bzr-mysql/default.conf
Text conflict in libmysqld/CMakeLists.txt
Text conflict in libmysqld/Makefile.am
Text conflict in mysql-test/collections/default.experimental
Text conflict in mysql-test/extra/rpl_tests/rpl_row_sp006.test
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/binlog/r/binlog_tmp_table.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_loaddata.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_loaddata_fatal.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_row_create_table.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_row_sp006_InnoDB.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_stm_log.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl_ndb/r/rpl_ndb_circular_simplex.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl_ndb/r/rpl_ndb_sp006.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/t/mysqlbinlog.test
Text conflict in sql/CMakeLists.txt
Text conflict in sql/Makefile.am
Text conflict in sql/log_event_old.cc
Text conflict in sql/rpl_rli.cc
Text conflict in sql/slave.cc
Text conflict in sql/sql_binlog.cc
Text conflict in sql/sql_lex.h
21 conflicts encountered.

NOTE
====
 mysql-5.1-rpl-merge has been made a mirror of mysql-next-mr:
 - "mysql-5.1-rpl-merge$ bzr pull ../mysql-next-mr"

 This is the first cset (merge/...) committed after pulling 
 from mysql-next-mr.
2009-10-22 23:30:28 +01:00
Alfranio Correia
4f164c4c5a BUG#48091 valgrind errors when slave has double not null and master has double null
Backporting BUG#43789 to mysql-5.1-bugteam
                              
The replication was generating corrupted data, warning messages on Valgrind
and aborting on debug mode while replicating a "null" to "not null" field.
Specifically the unpack_row routine, was considering the slave's table
definition and trying to retrieve a field value, where there was nothing to be
retrieved, ignoring the fact that the value was defined as "null" by the master.
                              
To fix the problem, we proceed as follows:
                              
1 - If it is not STRICT sql_mode, implicit default values are used, regardless
if it is multi-row or single-row statement.
                              
2 - However, if it is STRICT mode, then a we do what follows:
                              
2.1 If it is a transactional engine, we do a rollback on the first NULL that is
to be set into a NOT NULL column and return an error.
                              
2.2 If it is a non-transactional engine and it is the first row to be inserted
with multi-row, we also return the error. Otherwise, we proceed with the
execution, use implicit default values and print out warning messages.
                        
Unfortunately, the current patch cannot mimic the behavior showed by the master
for updates on multi-tables and multi-row inserts. This happens because such
statements are unfolded in different row events. For instance, considering the
following updates and strict mode:
                        
(master)
create table t1 (a int);
create table t2 (a int not null);
insert into t1 values (1);
insert into t2 values (2);
update t1, t2 SET t1.a=10, t2.a=NULL;
                        
t1 would have (10) and t2 would have (0) as this would be handled as a
multi-row update. On the other hand, if we had the following updates:
                        
(master)
create table t1 (a int);
create table t2 (a int);
                        
(slave)
create table t1 (a int);
create table t2 (a int not null);
                        
(master)
insert into t1 values (1);
insert into t2 values (2);
update t1, t2 SET t1.a=10, t2.a=NULL;
                        
On the master t1 would have (10) and t2 would have (NULL). On
the slave, t1 would have (10) but the update on t1 would fail.
2009-10-22 01:15:45 +01:00
Andrei Elkin
6d1ad12428 merge from 5.1-rpl+2 repo to a local branch with HB and bug@27808 fixes 2009-10-01 20:22:44 +03:00
Alfranio Correia
63278c561c BUG#43789 different master/slave table defs cause crash: text/varchar null
vs not null

NOTE: Backporting the patch to next-mr.
                        
The replication was generating corrupted data, warning messages on Valgrind
and aborting on debug mode while replicating a "null" to "not null" field.
Specifically the unpack_row routine, was considering the slave's table
definition and trying to retrieve a field value, where there was nothing to be
retrieved, ignoring the fact that the value was defined as "null" by the master.
                        
To fix the problem, we proceed as follows:
                        
1 - If it is not STRICT sql_mode, implicit default values are used, regardless
if it is multi-row or single-row statement.
                        
2 - However, if it is STRICT mode, then a we do what follows:
                        
2.1 If it is a transactional engine, we do a rollback on the first NULL that is
to be set into a NOT NULL column and return an error.
                        
2.2 If it is a non-transactional engine and it is the first row to be inserted
with multi-row, we also return the error. Otherwise, we proceed with the
execution, use implicit default values and print out warning messages.
                  
Unfortunately, the current patch cannot mimic the behavior showed by the master
for updates on multi-tables and multi-row inserts. This happens because such
statements are unfolded in different row events. For instance, considering the
following updates and strict mode:
                  
(master)
create table t1 (a int);
create table t2 (a int not null);
insert into t1 values (1);
insert into t2 values (2);
update t1, t2 SET t1.a=10, t2.a=NULL;
                  
t1 would have (10) and t2 would have (0) as this would be handled as a
multi-row update. On the other hand, if we had the following updates:
                  
(master)
create table t1 (a int);
create table t2 (a int);
                  
(slave)
create table t1 (a int);
create table t2 (a int not null);
                  
(master)
insert into t1 values (1);
insert into t2 values (2);
update t1, t2 SET t1.a=10, t2.a=NULL;
                  
On the master t1 would have (10) and t2 would have (NULL). On
the slave, t1 would have (10) but the update on t1 would fail.
2009-09-29 15:18:44 +01:00
Andrei Elkin
c03549bf05 WL#342 heartbeat
backporting from 6.0 code base to 5.1.
2009-09-29 14:16:23 +03:00
Tatiana A. Nurnberg
197182d749 Bug#43746: YACC return wrong query string when parse 'load data infile' sql statement
"load data" statements were written to the binlog as a mix of the original statement
and bits recreated from parse-info. This relied on implementation details and broke
with IGNORE_SPACES and versioned comments.

We now completely resynthesize the query for LOAD DATA for binlog (which among other
things normalizes them somewhat with regard to case, spaces, etc.).
We have already parsed the query properly, so we make use of that rather
than mix-and-match string literals and parsed items.
This should make us safe with regard to versioned comments, even those
spanning multiple tokens. Also no longer affected by IGNORE_SPACES.
2009-09-28 05:41:10 -07:00