Commit graph

22778 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Sergey Petrunya
1a998ee239 Merge 5.3->5.5 2013-03-01 11:44:10 +04:00
Igor Babaev
8fb2919e1d Merge 2013-02-28 17:09:56 -08:00
Igor Babaev
90c0f3d3ab Fixed bug mdev-4209
Do not include BLOB fields into the key to access the temporary
table created for a materialized view/derived table.
BLOB components are not allowed in keys.
2013-02-28 14:35:46 -08:00
Sergei Golubchik
213f1c76a0 5.3->5.5 merge 2013-02-28 22:47:29 +01:00
Sergei Golubchik
c4341d5095 5.2 -> 5.3 2013-02-28 21:48:47 +01:00
Sergei Golubchik
5dec570d7c 5.1 -> 5.2 merge 2013-02-28 19:00:58 +01:00
Sergei Golubchik
8161c6772d merge with mysql-5.5.30 minus few incorrect or not applicable changesets 2013-02-28 18:42:49 +01:00
Sergei Golubchik
027e34e13b a simpler fix for
MySQL Bug #12408412: GROUP_CONCAT + ORDER BY + INPUT/OUTPUT SAME USER VARIABLE = CRASH
and
MySQL Bug#14664077 SEVERE PERFORMANCE DEGRADATION IN SOME CASES WHEN USER VARIABLES ARE USED


sql/item_func.cc:
  don't use anything from Item_func_set_user_var::fix_fields()
  in Item_func_set_user_var::save_item_result()
sql/sql_class.cc:
  Call suv->save_item_result(item) *before* doing suv->fix_fields(), because
  the former evaluates the item (and caches its value), while the latter marks
  the user variable as non-const. The problem is that the item was fix_field'ed
  when the user variable was const, and it doesn't expect it to change to non-const
  in the middle of the execution.
2013-02-28 11:46:35 +01:00
Michael Widenius
6a2d730a7f Fixed BUG#51763 Can't delete rows from MEMORY table with HASH key 2013-02-28 10:00:07 +01:00
Igor Babaev
d434d79acf Fixed bug mdev-4177
The function remove_eq_cond removes the parts of a disjunction
for which it has been proved that they are always true. In the
result of this removal the disjunction may be converted into a 
formula without OR that must be merged into the the AND formula
that contains the disjunction.
The merging of two AND conditions must take into account the
multiple equalities that may be part of each of them.
These multiple equality must be merged and become part of the
and object built as the result of the merge of the AND conditions.
Erroneously the function remove_eq_cond lacked the code that 
would merge multiple equalities of the merged AND conditions.
This could lead to confusing situations when at the same AND 
level there were two multiple equalities with common members
and the list of equal items contained only some of these 
multiple equalities.
This, in its turn, could lead to an incorrect work of the
function substitute_for_best_equal_field when it tried to optimize
ref accesses. This resulted in forming invalid TABLE_REF objects
that were used to build look-up keys when materialized subqueries
were exploited.
2013-02-24 19:16:11 -08:00
Igor Babaev
ed7671d523 Fixed bug mdev-4172.
This bug in the legacy code could manifest itself in queries with
semi-join materialized subqueries.
When a subquery is materialized all conditions that are imposed
only on the columns belonging to the tables from the subquery 
are taken into account.The code responsible for subquery optimizations
that employes subquery materialization  makes sure to remove these
conditions from the WHERE conditions of the query obtained after
it has transformed the original query into a query with a semi-join.
If the condition to be removed is an equality condition it could
be added to ON expressions and/or conditions from disjunctive branches
(parts of OR conditions) in an attempt to generate better access keys
to the tables of the query. Such equalities are supposed to be removed
later from all the formulas where they have been added to.
However, erroneously, this was not done in some cases when an ON
expression and/or a disjunctive part of the OR condition could
be converted into one multiple equality. As a result some equality
predicates over columns belonging to the tables of the materialized
subquery remained in the ON condition and/or the a disjunctive 
part of the OR condition, and the excuter later, when trying to
evaluate them, returned wrong answers as the values of the fields
from these equalities were not valid.  
This happened because any standalone multiple equality (a multiple
equality that are not ANDed with any other predicates) lacked
the information about equality predicates inherited from upper
levels (in particular, inherited from the WHERE condition).
The fix adds a reference to such information to any standalone
multiple equality.
2013-02-21 17:13:12 -08:00
Igor Babaev
6537b551ca Merge. 2013-02-20 19:22:02 -08:00
Igor Babaev
c9b63e6a49 Fixed bug mdev-3913.
The wrong result set returned by the left join query  from
the bug test case happened due to several inconsistencies 
and bugs of the legacy mysql code.

The bug test case uses an execution plan that employs a scan
of a materialized IN subquery from the WHERE condition.
When materializing such an IN- subquery the optimizer injects
additional equalities  into the WHERE clause. These equalities
express the constraints imposed by the subquery predicate.
The injected equality of the query in the  test case happens
to belong to the same equality class, and a new equality 
imposing a condition on the rows of the materialized subquery
is inferred from this class. Simultaneously the multiple
equality is added to the ON expression of the LEFT JOIN
used in the main query.
  
The inferred equality of the form f1=f2 is taken into account
when optimizing the scan of  the rows the temporary table 
that is the result of the subquery materialization: only the 
values of the field f1 are read from the table into the record 
buffer. Meanwhile the inferred equality is removed from the
WHERE conditions altogether as a constraint on the fields
of the temporary table that has been used when filling this table. 
This equality is supposed to be removed from the ON expression
when the multiple equalities of the ON expression are converted
into an optimal set of equality predicates. It supposed to be
removed from the ON expression as an equality inferred from only
equalities of the WHERE condition. Yet, it did not happened
due to the following bug in the code.

Erroneously the code tried to build multiple equality for ON
expression twice: the first time, when it called optimize_cond()
for the WHERE condition, the second time, when it called
this function for the HAVING condition. When executing
optimize_con() for the WHERE condition  a reference
to the multiple equality of the WHERE condition is set
in the multiple equality of the  ON expression. This reference
would allow later to convert multiple equalities of the
ON expression into equality predicates. However the 
the second call of build_equal_items() for the ON expression
that happened when optimize_cond() was called for the
HAVING condition reset this reference to NULL.

This bug fix blocks calling build_equal_items() for ON
expressions for the second time. In general, it will be
beneficial for many queries as it removes from ON 
expressions any equalities that are to be checked for the
WHERE condition.
The patch also fixes two bugs in the list manipulation
operations and a bug in the function  
substitute_for_best_equal_field() that resulted
in passing wrong reference to the multiple equalities
of where conditions when processing multiple
equalities  of ON expressions.

The code of substitute_for_best_equal_field() and
the code the helper function eliminate_item_equal()
were also streamlined and cleaned up.
Now the conversion of the multiple equalities into
an optimal set of equality predicates first produces
the sequence of the all equalities processing multiple
equalities one by one, and, only after this, it inserts
the equalities at the beginning of the other conditions.

The multiple changes in the output of EXPLAIN
EXTENDED are mainly the result of this streamlining,
but in some cases is the result of the removal of
unneeded equalities from ON expressions. In
some test cases this removal were reflected in the
output of EXPLAIN resulted in disappearance of 
“Using where” in some rows of the execution plans.
2013-02-20 18:01:36 -08:00
Alexey Botchkov
ca29490102 MDEV-3819 missing constraints for spatial column types.
Checks added to return and error when inappropriate
    geometry type is stored in a field.
2013-02-21 01:03:45 +04:00
Mattias Jonsson
e96182824d Bug#16274455: CAN NOT ACESS PARTITIONED TABLES WHEN
DOWNGRADED FROM 5.6.11 TO 5.6.10

Problem was new syntax not accepted by previous version.

Fixed by adding version comment of /*!50531 around the
new syntax.

Like this in the .frm file:
'PARTITION BY KEY /*!50611 ALGORITHM = 2 */ () PARTITIONS 3'
and also changing the output from SHOW CREATE TABLE to:
CREATE TABLE t1 (a INT)
/*!50100 PARTITION BY KEY */ /*!50611 ALGORITHM = 1 */ /*!50100 ()
PARTITIONS 3 */

It will always add the ALGORITHM into the .frm for KEY [sub]partitioned
tables, but for SHOW CREATE TABLE it will only add it in case it is the non
default ALGORITHM = 1.

Also notice that for 5.5, it will say /*!50531 instead of /*!50611, which
will make upgrade from 5.5 > 5.5.31 to 5.6 < 5.6.11 fail!
If one downgrades an fixed version to the same major version (5.5 or 5.6) the
bug 14521864 will be visible again, but unless the .frm is updated, it will
work again when upgrading again.

Also fixed so that the .frm does not get updated version
if a single partition check passes.
2013-02-14 17:03:49 +01:00
unknown
d4b1e8f31a Fix for MDEV-4140
Analysis:
Range analysis detects that the subquery is expensive and doesn't
build a range access method. Later, the applicability test for loose
scan doesn't take that into account, and builds a loose scan method
without a range scan on the min/max column. As a result loose scan
fetches the first key in each group, rather than the first key that
satisfies the condition on the min/max column.

Solution:
Since there is no SEL_ARG tree to be used for the min/max column,
it is not possible to use loose scan if the min/max column is compared
with an expensive scalar subquery. Make the test for loose scan
applicability to be in sync with the range analysis code by testing if
the min/max argument is compared with an expensive predicate.
2013-02-13 11:58:16 +02:00
Igor Babaev
3a0b25bb07 Merge. 2013-02-12 11:49:46 -08:00
unknown
3f36dfe38c MDEV-4123 fix.
Missed update_used_tables() call for multi-update values.
2013-02-11 10:55:58 +02:00
Igor Babaev
48aee45957 Fixed bug mdev-3995.
This bug happened because the executor tried to use a wrong
TABLE REF object when building access keys. It constructed
keys from fields of a materialized table from a ref object
created to construct keys from the fields of the underlying
base table. This could happen only when materialized table
was created for a non-correlated IN subquery and only
when the materialized table used for lookups.
In this case we are guaranteed to be able to construct the
keys from the fields of tables that would be outer tables
for the tables of the IN subquery.
The patch makes sure that no ref objects constructed from
fields of materialized lookup tables are to be used.
2013-02-07 21:46:02 -08:00
unknown
0b2dc3fc59 Fix for bug MDEV-765 (LP:825075)
Analys:
The cause for the wrong result was that the optimizer
incorrectly chose min/max loose scan when it is not
applicable. The applicability test missed the case when
a condition on the MIN/MAX argument was OR-ed with a
condition on some other field. In this case, the MIN/MAX
condition cannot be used for loose scan.

Solution:
Extend the test check_group_min_max_predicates() to check
that the WHERE clause is of the form: "cond1 AND cond2"
where 
  cond1 - does not use min_max_column at all.
  cond2 - is an AND/OR tree with leaves in form "min_max_column $CMP$ const"
          or $CMP$ is one of the functions between, is [not] null
2013-02-04 17:35:48 +02:00
unknown
768b62fe2f Fix bug MDEV-641
Analysis:
Range analysis discoveres that the query can be executed via loose index scan for GROUP BY.
Later, GROUP BY analysis fails to confirm that the GROUP operation can be computed via an
index because there is no logic to handle duplicate field references in the GROUP clause.
As a result the optimizer produces an inconsistent plan. It constructs a temporary table,
but on the other hand the group fields are not set to point there.
    
Solution:
Make loose scan analysis work in sync with order by analysis. In the case of duplicate
columns loose scan will not be applicable. This limitation will be lifted in 10.0 by
removing duplicate columns.
2013-02-01 00:09:36 +02:00
Chaithra Gopalareddy
dbd25312fe Bug#14096619: UNABLE TO RESTORE DATABASE DUMP
Backport of fix for Bug#13581962

mysql-test/r/cast.result:
  Added test result for Bug#13581962,Bug#14096619
mysql-test/r/ctype_utf8mb4.result:
  Added test result for Bug#13581962,Bug#14096619
mysql-test/t/cast.test:
  Added test case for Bug#13581962,Bug#14096619
mysql-test/t/ctype_utf8mb4.test:
  Added test case for Bug#13581962,Bug#14096619
sql/item_func.h:
  limit max length by MY_INT64_NUM_DECIMAL_DIGITS
2013-01-31 07:06:30 +05:30
Chaithra Gopalareddy
e1ee9581cb Bug#14096619: UNABLE TO RESTORE DATABASE DUMP
Backport of Bug#13581962

mysql-test/r/cast.result:
  Added test result for Bug#13581962,Bug#14096619
mysql-test/t/cast.test:
  Added test case for Bug#13581962,Bug#14096619
sql/item_func.h:
  limit max length by MY_INT64_NUM_DECIMAL_DIGITS
2013-01-31 06:39:15 +05:30
Mattias Jonsson
d92a7cb76a Bug#14521864: MYSQL 5.1 TO 5.5 BUGS PARTITIONING
Due to an internal change in the server code in between 5.1 and 5.5
(wl#2649) the hash function used in KEY partitioning changed
for numeric and date/time columns (from binary hash calculation
to character based hash calculation).

Also enum/set changed from latin1 ci based hash calculation to
binary hash between 5.1 and 5.5. (bug#11759782).

These changes makes KEY [sub]partitioned tables on any of
the affected column types incompatible with 5.5 and above,
since the calculation of partition id differs.

Also since InnoDB asserts that a deleted row was previously
read (positioned), the server asserts on delete of a row that
is in the wrong partition.

The solution for this situation is:

1) The partitioning engine will check that delete/update will go to the
partition the row was read from and give an error otherwise, consisting
of the rows partitioning fields. This will avoid asserts in InnoDB and
also alert the user that there is a misplaced row. A detailed error
message will be given, including an entry to the error log consisting
of both table name, partition and row content (PK if exists, otherwise
all partitioning columns).


2) A new optional syntax for KEY () partitioning in 5.5 is allowed:
[SUB]PARTITION BY KEY [ALGORITHM = N] (list_of_cols)
Where N = 1 uses the same hashing as 5.1 (Numeric/date/time fields uses
binary hashing, ENUM/SET uses charset hashing) N = 2 uses the same
hashing as 5.5 (Numeric/date/time fields uses charset hashing,
ENUM/SET uses binary hashing). If not set on CREATE/ALTER it will
default to 2.

This new syntax should probably be ignored by NDB.


3) Since there is a demand for avoiding scanning through the full
table, during upgrade the ALTER TABLE t PARTITION BY ... command is
considered a no-op (only .frm change) if everything except ALGORITHM
is the same and ALGORITHM was not set before, which allows manually
upgrading such table by something like:
ALTER TABLE t PARTITION BY KEY ALGORITHM = 1 () or
ALTER TABLE t PARTITION BY KEY ALGORITHM = 2 ()


4) Enhanced partitioning with CHECK/REPAIR to also check for/repair
misplaced rows. (Also works for ALTER TABLE t CHECK/REPAIR PARTITION)

CHECK FOR UPGRADE:
If the .frm version is < 5.5.3
and uses KEY [sub]partitioning
and an affected column type
then it will fail with an message:
KEY () partitioning changed, please run:
ALTER TABLE `test`.`t1`  PARTITION BY KEY ALGORITHM = 1 (a)
PARTITIONS 12
(i.e. current partitioning clause, with the addition of
ALGORITHM = 1)

CHECK without FOR UPGRADE:
if MEDIUM (default) or EXTENDED options are given:
Scan all rows and verify that it is in the correct partition.
Fail for the first misplaced row.

REPAIR:
if default or EXTENDED (i.e. not QUICK/USE_FRM):
Scan all rows and every misplaced row is moved into its correct
partitions.


5) Updated mysqlcheck (called by mysql_upgrade) to handle the
new output from CHECK FOR UPGRADE, to run the ALTER statement
instead of running REPAIR.

This will allow mysql_upgrade (or CHECK TABLE t FOR UPGRADE) to upgrade
a KEY [sub]partitioned table that has any affected field type
and a .frm version < 5.5.3 to ALGORITHM = 1 without rebuild.


Also notice that if the .frm has a version of >= 5.5.3 and ALGORITHM
is not set, it is not possible to know if it consists of rows from
5.1 or 5.5! In these cases I suggest that the user does:
(optional)
LOCK TABLE t WRITE;
SHOW CREATE TABLE t;
(verify that it has no ALGORITHM = N, and to be safe, I would suggest
backing up the .frm file, to be used if one need to change to another
ALGORITHM = N, without needing to rebuild/repair)
ALTER TABLE t <old partitioning clause, but with ALGORITHM = N>;
which should set the ALGORITHM to N (if the table has rows from
5.1 I would suggest N = 1, otherwise N = 2)
CHECK TABLE t;
(here one could use the backed up .frm instead and change to a new N
and run CHECK again and see if it passes)
and if there are misplaced rows:
REPAIR TABLE t;
(optional)
UNLOCK TABLES;
2013-01-30 17:51:52 +01:00
unknown
f65e5841d7 Fix for MDEV-3948, and backport of the following collection of fixes and backports
from MariaDB 10.0.
  
The bug in mdev-3948 was an instance of the problem fixed by Sergey's patch
in 10.0 - namely that the range optimizer could change table->[read | write]_set,
and not restore it.
  
revno: 3471
committer: Sergey Petrunya <psergey@askmonty.org>
branch nick: 10.0-serg-fix-imerge
timestamp: Sat 2012-11-03 12:24:36 +0400
message:
  # MDEV-3817: Wrong result with index_merge+index_merge_intersection, InnoDB table, join, AND and OR conditions
  Reconcile the fixes from:
  #
  # guilhem.bichot@oracle.com-20110805143029-ywrzuz15uzgontr0
  # Fix for BUG#12698916 - "JOIN QUERY GIVES WRONG RESULT AT 2ND EXEC. OR
  # AFTER FLUSH TABLES [-INT VS NULL]"
  #
  # guilhem.bichot@oracle.com-20111209150650-tzx3ldzxe1yfwji6
  # Fix for BUG#12912171 - ASSERTION FAILED: QUICK->HEAD->READ_SET == SAVE_READ_SET
  # and
  #
  and related fixes from: BUG#1006164, MDEV-376:
  
  Now, ROR-merged QUICK_RANGE_SELECT objects make no assumptions about the values
  of table->read_set and table->write_set.
  Each QUICK_ROR_SELECT has (and had before) its own column bitmap, but now, all 
  QUICK_ROR_SELECT's functions that care: reset(), init_ror_merged_scan(), and 
  get_next()  will set table->read_set when invoked and restore it back to what 
  it was before the call before they return.

  This allows to avoid the mess when somebody else modifies table->read_set for 
  some reason.
2013-01-28 15:13:39 +02:00
Sergei Golubchik
87de27e46b 5.3 merge 2013-01-28 13:36:05 +01:00
Venkatesh Duggirala
3c5326f8cc Bug#16084594 USER_VAR ITEM IN 'LOAD FILE QUERY' WAS NOT
PROPERLY QUOTED IN BINLOG FILE
Merging fix from mysql-5.1
2013-01-28 14:58:55 +05:30
Venkatesh Duggirala
7e0901b97f Bug#16084594 USER_VAR ITEM IN 'LOAD FILE QUERY' WAS NOT
PROPERLY QUOTED IN BINLOG FILE
Problem: In load data file query, User variables are allowed
inside "Into_list" and "Set_list". These user variables used
inside these two lists are not properly guarded with backticks
while server is writting into binlog. Hence user variable names
like a` cannot be used in this context.

Fix: Properly quote these variables while
writting into binlog

mysql-test/r/func_compress.result:
  changing result file
mysql-test/r/variables.result:
  changing result file
mysql-test/suite/binlog/r/binlog_stm_mix_innodb_myisam.result:
  changing result file
sql/item_func.cc:
  Quote the user variable items
2013-01-28 14:41:54 +05:30
Sergei Golubchik
34e84c227f 5.2 merge 2013-01-28 09:12:23 +01:00
Sergei Golubchik
0791692bdc MDEV-3875 Wrong result (missing row) on a DISTINCT query with the same subquery in the SELECT list and GROUP BY
fix remove_dup_with_hash_index() and remove_dup_with_compare() to take NULLs into account
2013-01-26 22:33:18 +01:00
Sergei Golubchik
e400450f2d 5.1 merge 2013-01-25 17:22:21 +01:00
unknown
298008dc4f The problem was that expression with field after transformation (on the first execution)
reached by fix_fields() (via reference) before row which it belongs to (on the second execution)
and fix_field for row did not follow usual protocol for Items with argument
(first check that the item fixed then call fix_fields).

Item_row::fix_field fixed.
2013-01-25 16:56:57 +02:00
Sergei Golubchik
7f208d3c35 MDEV-729 lp:998028 - Server crashes on normal shutdown in closefrm after executing a query from MyISAM table
don't write a key value into the record buffer - a key length can be larger then the record length.
2013-01-25 14:29:46 +01:00
Sergei Golubchik
326d2d56fe MDEV-759 lp:998340 - Valgrind complains on simple selects containing expression DAY(FROM_UNIXTIME(-1))
check item->null_value before using the result of item->val_int()
2013-01-25 12:26:35 +01:00
Sergei Golubchik
672b293860 5.3 merge
client/mysqltest.cc:
  make --error to work for --change_user errors
2013-01-25 11:24:42 +01:00
Sergei Golubchik
de10e21411 5.2 merge 2013-01-25 10:20:45 +01:00
Sergei Golubchik
fa7d0c4fdf MDEV-3909 remote user enumeration
instead of returning Access denied on the incorrect user name,
emulate the complete failed logic procedure, possibly with
the change plugin packet.
2013-01-25 09:41:26 +01:00
Sergei Golubchik
82c022f2d5 report "using password: YES/NO" correctly for the COM_CHANGE_USER failures 2013-01-25 00:20:53 +01:00
Sergei Golubchik
bfc71e63a7 MDEV-3915 COM_CHANGE_USER allows fast password brute-forcing
allow only three failed change_user per connection.
successful change_user do NOT reset the counter

tests/mysql_client_test.c:
  make --error to work for --change_user errors
2013-01-25 00:17:39 +01:00
Igor Babaev
32151409c1 Merge 5.3->5.5 2013-01-23 15:18:05 -08:00
Igor Babaev
746152959a Merge 5.2->5.3 2013-01-21 21:29:19 -08:00
Igor Babaev
8127e631de Merge 5.1->5.2 2013-01-21 15:23:40 -08:00
Igor Babaev
82fe8a4e71 Merge. 2013-01-21 13:48:34 -08:00
Igor Babaev
fade3647ec Fixed bug mdev-4063 (bug #56927).
This bug could result in returning 0 for the expressions of the form 
<aggregate_function>(distinct field) when the system variable  
max_heap_table_size was set to a small enough number.
It happened because the method Unique::walk() did not support
the case when more than one pass was needed to merge the trees
of distinct values saved in an external file.

Backported a fix in grant_lowercase.test from mariadb 5.5.
2013-01-21 11:47:45 -08:00
unknown
82e39cb1e1 Fixed typo in the function name.
test suite added.
2013-01-22 13:29:59 +02:00
Sergei Golubchik
43c6953fa1 MDEV-4029 SELECT on information_schema using a subquery locks up the information_schema table due to incorrect mutexes handling
Early evaluation of subqueries in the WHERE conditions on I_S.*_STATUS tables,
otherwise the subquery on this same table will try to acquire LOCK_status twice.
2013-01-21 10:52:39 +01:00
Sergei Golubchik
7caa80c481 MDEV-3934 Assertion `((keypart_map+1) & keypart_map) == 0' failed in _mi_pack_key with an index on a POINT column
sel_arg_range_seq_next(): set keypart map also for GEOM_FLAG keys
2013-01-20 14:06:33 +01:00
Sergei Golubchik
cc74bb3178 MDEV-4029 SELECT on information_schema using a subquery locks up the information_schema table due to incorrect mutexes handling
Early evaluation of subqueries in the WHERE conditions on I_S.*_STATUS tables,
otherwise the subquery on this same table will try to acquire LOCK_status twice.

sql/item.h:
  remove unused method
2013-01-20 00:46:51 +01:00
Sergei Golubchik
fd9b911b70 MDEV-3908 crash in multi-table delete and mdl
Add a test case.
The fix comes with MySQL bug#15948123: SERVER WORKS INCORRECT WITH LONG TABLE ALIASES
2013-01-18 19:04:51 +01:00
Sergei Golubchik
d41d43f421 MDEV-4065 thd_kill_statement service 2013-01-18 19:04:23 +01:00