Problem: Drop Trigger succeeds even after setting read_only
variable to ON.
Fix: Fix is to report the standard error
(ER_OPTION_PREVENTS_STATEMENT)when global read_only variable
is set to ON.
SYNTAX TRIGGERS IN ANY WAY
Table with triggers which were using deprecated (5.0-only) syntax became
unavailable for any DML and DDL after upgrade to 5.1 version of server.
Attempt to execute any statement on such a table resulted in parsing
error reported. Since this included DROP TRIGGER and DROP TABLE
statements (actually, the latter was allowed but was not functioning
properly for such tables) it was impossible to fix the problem without
manual operations on .TRG and .TRN files in data directory.
The problem was that failure to parse trigger body (due to 5.0-only
syntax) when opening trigger file for a table prevented the table
from being open. This made all operations on the table impossible
(except DROP TABLE which due to peculiarity in its implementation
dropped the table but left trigger files around).
This patch solves this problem by silencing error which occurs when
we parse trigger body during table open. Error message is preserved
for the future use and table is marked as having a broken trigger.
We also try to analyze parse tree to recover trigger name, which
will be needed in order to drop the broken trigger. DML statements
which invoke triggers on the table marked as having broken trigger
are prohibited and emit saved error message. The same happens for
DDL which change triggers except DROP TRIGGER and DROP TABLE which
try their best to do what was requested. Table becomes no longer
marked as having broken trigger when last such trigger is dropped.
result set when SQLEXCEPTION is active.
The problem was in a hackish THD::no_warnings_for_error attribute.
When it was set, an error was not written to Warning_info -- only
Diagnostics_area state was changed. That means, Diagnostics_area
might contain error state, which is not present in Warning_info.
The user-visible problem was that in some cases SHOW WARNINGS
returned empty result set (i.e. there were no warnings) while
the previous SQL statement failed. According to the MySQL
protocol errors must be presented in warning list.
The main idea of this patch is to remove THD::no_warnings_for_error.
There were few places where it was used:
- sql_admin.cc, handling of REPAIR TABLE USE_FRM.
- sql_show.cc, when calling fill_schema_table_from_frm().
- sql_show.cc, when calling fill_table().
The fix is to either use internal-error-handlers, or to use
temporary Warning_info storing warnings, which might be ignored.
This patch is needed to fix Bug 11763162 (55843).
pre-locking list caused by triggers).
The thing is that CREATE TRIGGER / DROP TRIGGER may actually
change pre-locking list of (some) stored routines.
The SP-cache does not detect such changes. Thus if sp_head-instance
is cached in SP-cache, subsequent executions of the cached
sp_head will use inaccurate pre-locking list.
The patch is to invalidate SP-cache on CREATE TRIGGER / DROP TRIGGER.
FLUSH TABLES under FLUSH TABLES <list> WITH READ LOCK leads
to assert failure.
This assert was triggered if a statement tried up upgrade a metadata
lock with an active FLUSH TABLE <list> WITH READ LOCK. The assert
checks that the connection already holds a global intention exclusive
metadata lock. However, FLUSH TABLE <list> WITH READ LOCK does not
acquire this lock in order to be compatible with FLUSH TABLES WITH
READ LOCK. Therefore any metadata lock upgrade caused the assert to
be triggered.
This patch fixes the problem by preventing metadata lock upgrade
if the connection has an active FLUSH TABLE <list> WITH READ LOCK.
ER_TABLE_NOT_LOCKED_FOR_WRITE will instead be reported to the client.
Test case added to flush.test.
bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ
LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for
'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'".
The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred
when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER
statement, tried to update some data through DML statement
while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH
READ LOCK concurrently.
What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed
to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all
upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open
through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection
tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second
connection creating deadlock.
The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES
WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant
stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more
connections).
This has happened because requests for protection against GRL
which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of
pending GRL and thus the latter was starved.
This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL
using metadata locks.
Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new
implementation is two-step. During the first step we block
all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S
metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX
lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits
by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code
acquires global IX lock in this namespace).
Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of
protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic.
We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL
will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires
metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such
statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired
for its duration.
The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become
visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem
and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible.
The second problem is solved because global S locks which
are used for GRL implementation are given preference over
IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can
switch to fair scheduling in future if needed).
Important change:
FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables.
Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect:
in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were
blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases
for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are
not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently
allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL.
Important change:
This patch changes thread state names which are used when
DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now
either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit
lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is.
Incompatible change:
To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this
patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with
metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit
DDL on events under LOCK TABLES.
This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction
of DML/DDL and FTWRL.
Performance of new and old global read lock implementations
in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant
difference between new and old implementations.
The problem was that RENAME TABLE caused an assert if the system variable
lower_case_table_names was 2 (default on Mac OS X) and the old table name
was given in upper case. This caused lowercase_table2.test to fail.
The assert checks that an exclusive metadata lock is held by the connection
trying to do RENAME TABLE - specificially during updates of table triggers.
The assert was triggered since the check is case sensitive and the lock
was held on the normalized (lower case) version of the table name.
This patch fixes the problem by making sure a normalized version of the
table name is used for the metadata lock check, while using a non-normalized
version of the table name for the rename of trigger files. The same is done
for ALTER TABLE ... RENAME.
Regression testing for the bug itself is already covered by
lowercase_table2.test. Additional coverage added to lowercase_fs_off.test.
multi-table UPDATE IGNORE.
The problem was that if there was an active SELECT statement
during trigger execution, an error risen during the execution
may cause a crash. The fix is to temporary reset LEX::current_select
before trigger execution and restore it afterwards. This way
errors risen during the trigger execution are processed as
if there was no active SELECT.
to allow temp table operations) -- prerequisite patch #2.
Introduce a new form of find_temporary_table() function:
find_temporary_table() by a table key. It will be used
in further patches.
Replace find_temporary_table(table_list->db, table_list->name)
by more appropiate find_temporary_table(table_list) across
the codebase.
Remove acquisition of LOCK_open around file system operations,
since such operations are now protected by metadata locks.
Rework table discovery algorithm to not require LOCK_open.
No new tests added since all MDL locking operations are covered
in lock.test and mdl_sync.test, and as long as these tests
pass despite the increased concurrency, consistency must be
unaffected.
This patch also fixes Bug#55452 "SET PASSWORD is
replicated twice in RBR mode".
The goal of this patch is to remove the release of
metadata locks from close_thread_tables().
This is necessary to not mistakenly release
the locks in the course of a multi-step
operation that involves multiple close_thread_tables()
or close_tables_for_reopen().
On the same token, move statement commit outside
close_thread_tables().
Other cleanups:
Cleanup COM_FIELD_LIST.
Don't call close_thread_tables() in COM_SHUTDOWN -- there
are no open tables there that can be closed (we leave
the locked tables mode in THD destructor, and this
close_thread_tables() won't leave it anyway).
Make open_and_lock_tables() and open_and_lock_tables_derived()
call close_thread_tables() upon failure.
Remove the calls to close_thread_tables() that are now
unnecessary.
Simplify the back off condition in Open_table_context.
Streamline metadata lock handling in LOCK TABLES
implementation.
Add asserts to ensure correct life cycle of
statement transaction in a session.
Remove a piece of dead code that has also become redundant
after the fix for Bug 37521.
strict aliasing violations.
One somewhat major source of strict-aliasing violations and
related warnings is the SQL_LIST structure. For example,
consider its member function `link_in_list` which takes
a pointer to pointer of type T (any type) as a pointer to
pointer to unsigned char. Dereferencing this pointer, which
is done to reset the next field, violates strict-aliasing
rules and might cause problems for surrounding code that
uses the next field of the object being added to the list.
The solution is to use templates to parametrize the SQL_LIST
structure in order to deference the pointers with compatible
types. As a side bonus, it becomes possible to remove quite
a few casts related to acessing data members of SQL_LIST.
SELECT and ALTER TABLE ... REBUILD PARTITION".
ALTER TABLE on InnoDB table (including partitioned tables)
acquired exclusive locks on rows of table being altered.
In cases when there was concurrent transaction which did
locking reads from this table this sometimes led to a
deadlock which was not detected by MDL subsystem nor by
InnoDB engine (and was reported only after exceeding
innodb_lock_wait_timeout).
This problem stemmed from the fact that ALTER TABLE acquired
TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock on table being altered. This lock
was interpreted as a write lock and thus for table being
altered handler::external_lock() method was called with
F_WRLCK as an argument. As result InnoDB engine treated
ALTER TABLE as an operation which is going to change data
and acquired LOCK_X locks on rows being read from old
version of table.
In case when there was a transaction which already acquired
SR metadata lock on table and some LOCK_S locks on its rows
(e.g. by using it in subquery of DML statement) concurrent
ALTER TABLE was blocked at the moment when it tried to
acquire LOCK_X lock before reading one of these rows.
The transaction's attempt to acquire SW metadata lock on
table being altered led to deadlock, since it had to wait
for ALTER TABLE to release SNW lock. This deadlock was not
detected and got resolved only after timeout expiring
because waiting were happening in two different subsystems.
Similar deadlocks could have occured in other situations.
This patch tries to solve the problem by changing ALTER TABLE
implementation to use TL_READ_NO_INSERT lock instead of
TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ. After this step handler::external_lock()
is called with F_RDLCK as an argument and InnoDB engine
correctly interprets ALTER TABLE as operation which only
reads data from original version of table. Thanks to this
ALTER TABLE acquires only LOCK_S locks on rows it reads.
This, in its turn, causes inter-subsystem deadlocks to go
away, as all potential lock conflicts and thus deadlocks will
be limited to metadata locking subsystem:
- When ALTER TABLE reads rows from table being altered it
can't encounter any locks which conflict with LOCK_S row
locks. There should be no concurrent transactions holding
LOCK_X row locks. Such a transaction should have been
acquired SW metadata lock on table first which would have
conflicted with ALTER's SNW lock.
- Vice versa, when DML which runs concurrently with ALTER
TABLE tries to lock row it should be requesting only LOCK_S
lock which is compatible with locks acquired by ALTER,
as otherwise such DML must own an SW metadata lock on table
which would be incompatible with ALTER's SNW lock.
transactional SELECT and ALTER TABLE ... REBUILD PARTITION".
The goal of this patch is to decouple type of metadata
lock acquired for table by open_tables() from type of
table-level lock to be acquired on it.
To achieve this we change approach to how we determine what
type of metadata lock should be acquired on table to be open.
Now instead of inferring it at open_tables() time from flags
and type of table-level lock we rely on that type of metadata
lock is properly set at parsing time and is not changed
further.
Item_hex_string::Item_hex_string
The status of memory allocation in the Lex_input_stream (called
from the Parser_state constructor) was not checked which led to
a parser crash in case of the out-of-memory error.
The solution is to introduce new init() member function in
Parser_state and Lex_input_stream so that status of memory
allocation can be returned to the caller.
Fix for bug #46947 "Embedded SELECT without FOR UPDATE is
causing a lock", with after-review fixes.
SELECT statements with subqueries referencing InnoDB tables
were acquiring shared locks on rows in these tables when they
were executed in REPEATABLE-READ mode and with statement or
mixed mode binary logging turned on.
This was a regression which were introduced when fixing
bug 39843.
The problem was that for tables belonging to subqueries
parser set TL_READ_DEFAULT as a lock type. In cases when
statement/mixed binary logging at open_tables() time this
type of lock was converted to TL_READ_NO_INSERT lock at
open_tables() time and caused InnoDB engine to acquire
shared locks on reads from these tables. Although in some
cases such behavior was correct (e.g. for subqueries in
DELETE) in case of SELECT it has caused unnecessary locking.
This patch tries to solve this problem by rethinking our
approach to how we handle locking for SELECT and subqueries.
Now we always set TL_READ_DEFAULT lock type for all cases
when we read data. When at open_tables() time this lock
is interpreted as TL_READ_NO_INSERT or TL_READ depending
on whether this statement as a whole or call to function
which uses particular table should be written to the
binary log or not (if yes then statement should be properly
serialized with concurrent statements and stronger lock
should be acquired).
Test coverage is added for both InnoDB and MyISAM.
This patch introduces an "incompatible" change in locking
scheme for subqueries used in SELECT ... FOR UPDATE and
SELECT .. IN SHARE MODE.
In 4.1 the server would use a snapshot InnoDB read for
subqueries in SELECT FOR UPDATE and SELECT .. IN SHARE MODE
statements, regardless of whether the binary log is on or off.
If the user required a different type of read (i.e. locking read),
he/she could request so explicitly by providing FOR UPDATE/IN SHARE MODE
clause for each individual subquery.
On of the patches for 5.0 broke this behaviour (which was not documented
or tested), and started to use locking reads fora all subqueries in SELECT ...
FOR UPDATE/IN SHARE MODE. This patch restored 4.1 behaviour.
Adding my_global.h first in all files using
NO_EMBEDDED_ACCESS_CHECKS.
Correcting a merge problem resulting from a changed definition
of check_some_access compared to the original patches.
This patch:
- Moves all definitions from the mysql_priv.h file into
header files for the component where the variable is
defined
- Creates header files if the component lacks one
- Eliminates all include directives from mysql_priv.h
- Eliminates all circular include cycles
- Rename time.cc to sql_time.cc
- Rename mysql_priv.h to sql_priv.h
Cherry-pick a fix Bug#37148 from next-mr, to preserve
file ids of the added files, and ensure that all the necessary
changes have been pulled.
Since initially Bug#37148 was null-merged into 6.0,
the changeset that is now being cherry-picked was likewise
null merged into next-4284.
Now that Bug#37148 has been reapplied to 6.0, try to make
it work with next-4284. This is also necessary to be able
to pull other changes from 5.1-rep into next-4284.
To resolve the merge issues use this changeset applied
to 6.0:
revid:jperkin@sun.com-20091216103628-ylhqf7s6yegui2t9
revno: 3776.1.1
committer: He Zhenxing <zhenxing.he@sun.com>
branch nick: 6.0-codebase-bugfixing
timestamp: Thu 2009-12-17 17:02:50 +0800
message:
Fix merge problem with Bug#37148
Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the
MDL subsystem.
Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and
bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and
alter table".
The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a
transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER
statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a
table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before
ALTER started.
The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level
locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after
innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout.
A transaction would start using the table and modify a few
rows.
Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows
into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on
the modified records and get blocked on a row lock.
The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get
blocked on thr_lock.c lock.
This situation of circular wait would only get resolved
by a timeout.
Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the
problem of deadlocks occurring between different
locking subsystems.
In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata
locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared
metadata lock to exclusive one.
Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for
some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively.
We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions
that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires
TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes
against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost
when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ
lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c
lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need
to abort such transactions.
The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any
mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks
in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than
innodb_lock_wait_timeout.
This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts
which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking
subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such
deadlocks inside MDL.
To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata
locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that
transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what
kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the
object.
This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable
metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all
transactions which has updated the table to go away.
This solves the second issue.
Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired
by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the
first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of
DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary.
Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by
this patch:
- From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those
statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock)
wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to
complete.
- From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE
(i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait
for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table
to complete.
As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies
to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE.
- DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort
statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or
renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete.
- Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock,
not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table
and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm
that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES
WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for
MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL
subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may
lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement
transactions even if these only use MyISAM:
session 1: session 2:
begin;
update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write;
-- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1
update t2 ...
(ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK)
- Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE
was abandoned.
LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same
priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE.
SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in
the wait queue.
- We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly
locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses
table t1, and issues:
LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE;
FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'),
an error is produced.
In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES,
the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
The problem was that a DROP TRIGGER statement inside a stored
procedure could cause a crash in subsequent invocations. This
was due to the addition, on the first execution, of a temporary
table reference to the stored procedure query table list. In
a subsequent invocation, there would be a attempt to reinitialize
the temporary table reference, which by then was already gone.
The solution is to backup and reset the query table list each
time a trigger needs to be dropped. This ensures that any temp
changes to the query table list are discarded. It is safe to
do so at this time as drop trigger is restricted from more
complicated scenarios (ie, not allowed within stored functions,
etc).
Bug#42546 Backup: RESTORE fails, thinking it finds an existing table
The problem occured when a MDL locking conflict happened for a non-existent
table between a CREATE and a INSERT statement. The code for CREATE
interpreted this lock conflict to mean that the table existed,
which meant that the statement failed when it should not have.
The problem could occur for CREATE TABLE, CREATE TABLE LIKE and
ALTER TABLE RENAME.
This patch fixes the problem for CREATE TABLE and CREATE TABLE LIKE.
It is based on code backported from the mysql-6.1-fk tree written
by Dmitry Lenev. CREATE now uses normal open_and_lock_tables() code
to acquire exclusive locks. This means that for the test case in the bug
description, CREATE will wait until INSERT completes so that it can
get the exclusive lock. This resolves the reported bug.
The patch also prohibits CREATE TABLE and CREATE TABLE LIKE under
LOCK TABLES. Note that this is an incompatible change and must
be reflected in the documentation. Affected test cases have been
updated.
mdl_sync.test contains tests for CREATE TABLE and CREATE TABLE LIKE.
Fixing the issue for ALTER TABLE RENAME is beyond the scope of this
patch. ALTER TABLE cannot be prohibited from working under LOCK TABLES
as this could seriously impact customers and a proper fix would require
a significant rewrite.
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2617.68.25
committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com>
branch nick: mysql-next-bg-pre2-2
timestamp: Wed 2009-09-16 18:26:50 +0400
message:
Follow-up for one of pre-requisite patches for fixing bug #30977
"Concurrent statement using stored function and DROP FUNCTION
breaks SBR".
Made enum_mdl_namespace enum part of MDL_key class and removed MDL_
prefix from the names of enum members. In order to do the latter
changed name of PROCEDURE symbol to PROCEDURE_SYM (otherwise macro
which was automatically generated for this symbol conflicted with
MDL_key::PROCEDURE enum member).
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2617.68.24
committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com>
branch nick: mysql-next-bg-pre2-2
timestamp: Wed 2009-09-16 17:25:29 +0400
message:
Pre-requisite patch for fixing bug #30977 "Concurrent statement
using stored function and DROP FUNCTION breaks SBR".
Added MDL_request for stored routine as member to Sroutine_hash_entry
in order to be able perform metadata locking for stored routines in
future (Sroutine_hash_entry is an equivalent of TABLE_LIST class for
stored routines).
(WL#4284, follow up fixes).
Introduce a counter for protection against global read lock on thread level.
The functions for protection against global read lock sometimes need a local
variable to signal when the protection is set, and hence need to be released.
It would be better to control this behaviour via a counter on the THD struct,
telling how many times the protection has been claimed by the current thread.
A side-effect of the fix is that if protection is claimed twice for a thread,
only a simple increment is required for the second claim, instead of a
mutex-protected increment of the global variable protect_against_global_read_lock.
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2617.69.32
committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com>
branch nick: mysql-next-bg46747
timestamp: Wed 2009-08-19 18:12:27 +0400
message:
Fix for bug #46747 "Crash in MDL_ticket::upgrade_shared_lock_to_exclusive
on TRIGGER + TEMP table".
Server crashed when one tried to drop trigger which had its subject
table shadowed by a temporary table with the same name.
This problem occured because in such situation DROP TRIGGER has opened
temporary table instead of base table on which trigger was defined.
Attempt to upgrade metadata lock on this temporary table led to crash
(we don't acquire metadata locks for temporary tables).
This fix ensures that DROP TRIGGER ignores temporary tables when
trying to open table on which trigger to be dropped is defined.
