Analysis:
-------------------------------
According to the Manual
(http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/identifier-case-sensitivity.html):
"Column, index, stored routine, and event names are not case sensitive on any
platform, nor are column aliases."
In other words, 'lower_case_table_names' does not affect the behaviour of
those identifiers.
On the other hand, trigger names are case sensitive on some platforms,
and case insensitive on others. 'lower_case_table_names' does not affect
the behaviour of trigger names either.
The bug was that SHOW statements did case sensitive comparison
for stored procedure / stored function / event names.
Fix:
Modified the code so that comparison in case insensitive for routines
and events for "SHOW" operation.
As part of this commit, only fixing the test failures due to the actual code fix.
FUNCTION DOES NOT EXIST IF NOT-PRIV USER RECONNECTS".
The bug itself was fixed by the same patch as bug@11747137
"30977: CONCURRENT STATEMENT USING STORED FUNCTION AND DROP
FUNCTION BREAKS SBR".
FLUSH TABLES <list> WITH READ LOCK are incompatible" to
be pushed as separate patch.
Replaced thread state name "Waiting for table", which was
used by threads waiting for a metadata lock or table flush,
with a set of names which better reflect types of resources
being waited for.
Also replaced "Table lock" thread state name, which was used
by threads waiting on thr_lock.c table level lock, with more
elaborate "Waiting for table level lock", to make it
more consistent with other thread state names.
Updated test cases and their results according to these
changes.
Fixed sys_vars.query_cache_wlock_invalidate_func test to not
to wait for timeout of wait_condition.inc script.
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 3035.4.1
committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM>
branch nick: 39897-6.0
timestamp: Thu 2009-01-15 12:17:57 -0200
message:
Bug#39897: lock_multi fails in pushbuild: timeout waiting for processlist
The problem is that relying on the "Table lock" thread state in
its current position to detect that a thread is waiting on a lock
is race prone. The "Table lock" state change happens before the
thread actually tries to grab a lock on a table.
The solution is to move the "Table lock" state so that its set
only when a thread is actually going to wait for a lock. The state
change happens after the thread fails to grab the lock (because it
is owned by other thread) and proceeds to wait on a condition.
This is considered part of work related to WL#4284 "Transactional
DDL locking"
Warning: this patch contains an incompatible change.
When waiting on a lock in thr_lock.c, the server used to display "Locked"
processlist state. After this patch, the state is "Table lock".
The new state was actually intended to be display since year 2002,
when Monty added it. But up until removal of thd->locked boolean
member, this state was ignored by SHOW PROCESSLIST code.
an assertion in a debug build.
The reason is that the C API doesn't support multiple result sets for prepared
statements and attempting to execute a stored routine which returns multiple result
sets sometimes lead to a network error. The network error sets the diagnostic area
prematurely which later leads to the assert when an attempt is made to set a second
server state.
This patch fixes the issue by changing the scope of the error code returned by
sp_instr_stmt::execute() to include any error which happened during the execution.
To assure that Diagnostic_area::is_sent really mean that the message was sent all
network related functions are checked for return status.
The crash happens because of uninitialized
lex->ssl_cipher, lex->x509_subject, lex->x509_issuer variables.
The fix is to add initialization of these variables for
stored procedures&functions.
+ Fix for Bug#43114 wait_until_count_sessions too restrictive, random PB failures
+ Removal of a lot of other weaknesses found
+ modifications according to review
The problem is that since MyISAM's concurrent_insert is on by
default some concurrent SELECT statements might not see changes
made by INSERT statements in other connections, even if the
INSERT statement has returned.
The solution is to disable concurrent_insert so that INSERT
statements returns after the data is actually visible to other
statements.
- Add prelocking for stored procedures that uses sp or sf
- Update test result for sp_error(reported as bug#21294)
- Make note about new error message from sp-error(bug#17244)
