This was done after discussions with Igor, Sanja and Bar.
The main reason for removing the deprication was to ensure that MariaDB
is always backward compatible whenever possible.
Other things:
- Added statistics counters, mainly for the feedback plugin.
- INTO OUTFILE
- INTO variable
- If INTO is using the old syntax (end of query)
This includes all test changes from
"Changing all cost calculation to be given in milliseconds"
and forwards.
Some of the things that caused changes in the result files:
- As part of fixing tests, I added 'echo' to some comments to be able to
easier find out where things where wrong.
- MATERIALIZED has now a higher cost compared to X than before. Because
of this some MATERIALIZED types have changed to DEPENDEND SUBQUERY.
- Some test cases that required MATERIALIZED to repeat a bug was
changed by adding more rows to force MATERIALIZED to happen.
- 'Filtered' in SHOW EXPLAIN has in many case changed from 100.00 to
something smaller. This is because now filtered also takes into
account the smallest possible ref access and filters, even if they
where not used. Another reason for 'Filtered' being smaller is that
we now also take into account implicit filtering done for subqueries
using FIRSTMATCH.
(main.subselect_no_exists_to_in)
This is caluculated in best_access_path() and stored in records_out.
- Table orders has changed because more accurate costs.
- 'index' and 'ALL' for small tables has changed to use 'range' or
'ref' because of optimizer_scan_setup_cost.
- index can be changed to 'range' as 'range' optimizer assumes we don't
have to read the blocks from disk that range optimizer has already read.
This can be confusing in the case where there is no obvious where clause
but instead there is a hidden 'key_column > NULL' added by the optimizer.
(main.subselect_no_exists_to_in)
- Scan on primary clustered key does not report 'Using Index' anymore
(It's a table scan, not an index scan).
- For derived tables, the number of rows is now 100 instead of 2,
which can be seen in EXPLAIN.
- More tests have "Using index for group by" as the cost of this
optimization is now more correct (lower).
- A primary key could be preferred for a normal key, even if it would
access more rows, as it's faster to do 1 lokoup and 3 'index_next' on a
clustered primary key than one lookup trough a secondary.
(main.stat_tables_innodb)
Notes:
- There was a 4.7% more calls to best_extension_by_limited_search() in
the main.greedy_optimizer test. However examining the test results
it looked that the plans where slightly better (eq_ref where more
chained together) so I assume this is ok.
- I have verified a few test cases where there was notable/unexpected
changes in the plan and in all cases the new optimizer plans where
faster. (main.greedy_optimizer and some others)
Some tests drop the default mtr database "test". This may fail due
to the directory not being empty. InnoDB may not delete all tables
immediately, due to the "background drop table queue" or its
replacement in commit 1bd681c8b3
(the purge of history would clean up after a DDL operation during
which the server was killed).
Let us try to avoid "drop database test" whenever it is easily possible.
Where it is not, SET GLOBAL innodb_max_purge_lag_wait=0 will ensure
that the replacement of the "background drop table queue" will have
completed its job.
The problem is that if table definition cache (TDC) is full of real tables
which are in tables cache, view definition can not stay there so will be
removed by its own underlying tables.
In situation above old mechanism of detection matching definition in PS
and current version always require reprepare and so prevent executing
the PS.
One work around is to increase TDC, other - improve version check for
views/triggers (which is done here). Now in suspicious cases we check:
- timestamp (microseconds) of the view to be sure that version really
have changed;
- time (microseconds) of creation of a trigger related to time
(microseconds) of statement preparation.
1. For INSERT..SELECT statements: don't include table/view the data
is inserted into in the list of leaf tables
2. Remove duplicated and dead code related to table_count
This bug caused crashes when the server executed such a CREATE VIEW
statement whose view specification contained a reference to an unknown
column in a subquery used in ON condition.
The cause of this bug is quite similar to the cause of the bug MDEV-26412.
The fix of this bug is quite similar to the fix for MDEV-26412.
Approved by Sergey Petrunia <sergey@mariadb.com>
This bug could affect prepared statements for the command CREATE VIEW with
specification that contained unnamed basic constant in select list. If
generation of a valid name for the corresponding view column required
resolution of conflicts with names of other columns that were explicitly
defined then execution of such prepared statement and following deallocation
of this statement led to reading from freed memory.
Approved by Oleksandr Byelkin <sanja@mariadb.com>
Also increase user name up to 128.
The work was started by Rucha Deodhar <rucha.deodhar@mariadb.com>,
contains audit plugin fixes by Alexey Botchkov <holyfoot@askmonty.org>.
Adds an implementation for SELECT ... FOR UPDATE SKIP LOCKED /
SELECT ... LOCK IN SHARED MODE SKIP LOCKED
This is implemented only InnoDB at the moment, not in RockDB yet.
This adds a new hander flag HA_CAN_SKIP_LOCKED than
will be used when the storage engine advertises the flag.
When a storage engine indicates this flag it will get
TL_WRITE_SKIP_LOCKED and TL_READ_SKIP_LOCKED transaction types.
The Lex structure has been updated to store both the FOR UPDATE/LOCK IN
SHARE as well as the SKIP LOCKED so the SHOW CREATE VIEW
implementation is simplier.
"SELECT FOR UPDATE ... SKIP LOCKED" combined with CREATE TABLE AS or
INSERT.. SELECT on the result set is not safe for STATEMENT based
replication. MIXED replication will replicate this as row based events."
Thanks to guidance from Facebook commit
193896c466
This helped verify basic test case, and components that need implementing
(even though every part was implemented differently).
Thanks Marko for guidance on simplier InnoDB implementation.
Reviewers: Marko, Monty
