Commit graph

999 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Luis Soares
1d0eae6fca BUG 46697
Addressing review comments.
2010-12-14 16:43:25 +00:00
Luis Soares
8282ddc430 BUG#46697: Table name in error message is not populated
When a query fails with a different error on the slave,
the sql thread outputs a message (M) containing:

  1. the error message format for the master error code
  2. the master error code
  3. the error message for the slave's error code
  4. the slave error code

Given that the slave has no information on the error message
itself that the master outputs, it can only print its own
version of the message format (but stripped from the 
additional data if the message format requires). This may
confuse users.

To fix this we augment the slave's message (M) to explicitly
state that the master's message is actually an error message 
format, the one associated with the given master error code 
and that the slave server knows about.
2010-12-03 17:17:45 +00:00
180e74bd49 Bug#27606 GRANT statement should be replicated with DEFINER information
"Grantor" columns' data is lost when replicating mysql.tables_priv.
Slave SQL thread used its default user ''@'' as the grantor of GRANT|REVOKE
statements executing on it.

In this patch, current user is put in query log event for all GRANT and REVOKE
statement, SQL thread uses the user in query log event as grantor.
2010-10-23 20:55:44 +08:00
aa235b1b15 Bug#55478 Row events wrongly apply on the temporary table of the same name
Rows events were applied wrongly on the temporary table with the same name.
But rows events are generated only for base tables. As temporary
table's data never be binlogged on row mode. Normally, base table of the
same name cannot be updated if a temporary table has the same name.
But there are two cases which can generate rows events on 
the base table of same name.
      
Case1: 'CREATE TABLE ... SELECT' statement.
In mixed format, it will generate rows events if it is unsafe.
      
Case2: Drop a transactional temporary table in a transaction
       (happens only on 5.5+).
BEGIN;
DROP TEMPORARY TABLE t1;       # t1 is a InnoDB table
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(rand()); # t1 is a MyISAM table
COMMIT;
'DROP TEMPORARY TABLE' will be put in the transaction cache and
binlogged after the rows events generated by the 'INSERT' statement.
      
After this patch, slave opens only base table when applying a rows event.
2010-10-21 13:43:19 +08:00
Davi Arnaut
39e9bde2c0 Bug#45288: pb2 returns a lot of compilation warnings
Tag or remove unused arguments and variables.
2010-10-19 20:36:59 -02:00
Luis Soares
0e5d43cd81 BUG 38718: automerged bzr bundle from bug report into
latest mysql-5.1-bugteam.
2010-10-13 08:25:43 +01:00
b66825912a Bug#55375 Transaction bigger than max_binlog_cache_size crashes slave
When slave executes a transaction bigger than slave's max_binlog_cache_size,
slave will crash. It is caused by the assert that server should only roll back
the statement but not the whole transaction if the error ER_TRANS_CACHE_FULL 
happens. But slave sql thread always rollbacks the whole transaction when
an error happens.
            
Ather this patch, we always clear any error set in sql thread(it is different
from the error in 'SHOW SLAVE STATUS') and it is cleared before rolling back
the transaction.
2010-10-09 15:05:43 +08:00
Luis Soares
5109d5401e BUG#38718: slave sql thread crashes when reading relay log
Suprisingly, a Slave_log_event would show up in the binary
log. This event is never used and should not appear in the
logs. As such, when the slave (or the mysqlbinlog tool) reads the
event, it will hit an invalid pointer (reference to the
descriptor event when deserializing the Slave_log_event was
purposodely set to NULL).
      
The presence of the Slave_log_event denotes a corrupted log, but
we cannot tell how the log got corrupted in the first
place. However, we can make the server cope with such events when
it reads them - in case of log corruption - and fail gracefully.
     
This patch makes the server/mysqlbinlog to report that it has
found an invalid log event when Slave_log_event is read.
2010-10-06 12:23:46 +01:00
Davi Arnaut
ed9ffc6b09 Bug#45288: pb2 returns a lot of compilation warnings on linux
Although the C standard mandates that sprintf return the number
of bytes written, some very ancient systems (i.e. SunOS 4)
returned a pointer to the buffer instead. Since these systems
are not supported anymore and are hopefully long dead by now,
simply remove the portability wrapper that dealt with this
discrepancy. The autoconf check was causing trouble with GCC.
2010-07-09 09:00:17 -03:00
b440125f1c Postfix bug#48321
Fix the memory leak
2010-07-08 10:44:26 +08:00
42eecc539a The following statements support the CURRENT_USER() where a user is needed.
DROP USER 
RENAME USER CURRENT_USER() ...
GRANT ... TO CURRENT_USER()
REVOKE ... FROM CURRENT_USER()
ALTER DEFINER = CURRENT_USER() EVENTbut, When these statements are binlogged, CURRENT_USER() just is binlogged
as 'CURRENT_USER()', it is not expanded to the real user name. When slave 
executes the log event, 'CURRENT_USER()' is expand to the user of slave 
SQL thread, but SQL thread's user name always NULL. This breaks the replication.

After this patch, session's user will be written into query log events 
if these statements call CURREN_USER() or 'ALTER EVENT' does not assign a definer.
2010-07-04 12:02:49 +08:00
Davi Arnaut
93fb8bb235 Bug#53445: Build with -Wall and fix warnings that it generates
Apart strict-aliasing warnings, fix the remaining warnings
generated by GCC 4.4.4 -Wall and -Wextra flags.

One major source of warnings was the in-house function my_bcmp
which (unconventionally) took pointers to unsigned characters
as the byte sequences to be compared. Since my_bcmp and bcmp
are deprecated functions whose only difference with memcmp is
the return value, every use of the function is replaced with
memcmp as the special return value wasn't actually being used
by any caller.

There were also various other warnings, mostly due to type
mismatches, missing return values, missing prototypes, dead
code (unreachable) and ignored return values.
2010-07-02 15:30:47 -03:00
Davi Arnaut
1b504ab0b1 Revert Bug#48321 due to build breakage and failing tests. 2010-06-28 17:59:41 -03:00
Alfranio Correia
353e11070f merge mysql-5.1-bugteam (local) --> mysql-5.1-bugteam 2010-06-27 18:31:42 +01:00
899a1d694f The following statements support the CURRENT_USER() where a user is needed.
DROP USER 
RENAME USER CURRENT_USER() ...
GRANT ... TO CURRENT_USER()
REVOKE ... FROM CURRENT_USER()
ALTER DEFINER = CURRENT_USER() EVENTbut, When these statements are binlogged, CURRENT_USER() just is binlogged
as 'CURRENT_USER()', it is not expanded to the real user name. When slave 
executes the log event, 'CURRENT_USER()' is expand to the user of slave 
SQL thread, but SQL thread's user name always NULL. This breaks the replication.

After this patch, session's user will be written into query log events 
if these statements call CURREN_USER() or 'ALTER EVENT' does not assign a definer.
2010-06-27 12:42:06 +08:00
Alfranio Correia
3b41760565 merge mysql-5.1-bugteam (local) --> mysql-5.1-bugteam 2010-06-17 01:25:07 +01:00
Luis Soares
ee0738edfe BUG#53893: RBR: nullable unique key can lead to out-of-sync slave
Post-push fix.
  
There was a valgrind issue on the loop that checks whether there
are NULL fields in the UNIQUE KEY or not. In detail, for the last 
iteration the server may read out of the key_part array boundaries,
making valgrind to output warnings.

We fix this by correcting the loop, ie, moving the part that reads
from the key_part to be inside the loop statement block. This way
the assignment is protected by the loop condition.
2010-06-04 00:45:07 +01:00
Luis Soares
8ce9f9b317 BUG#53893: RBR: nullable unique key can lead to out-of-sync slave
When using Unique Keys with nullable parts in RBR, the slave can
choose the wrong row to update. This happens because a table with
an unique key containing nullable parts cannot strictly guarantee 
uniqueness. As stated in the manual, for all engines, a UNIQUE 
index allows multiple NULL values for columns that can contain 
NULL.

We fix this at the slave by extending the checks before assuming
that the row found through an unique index is is the correct
one. This means that when a record (R) is fetched from the storage
engine and a key that is not primary (K) is used, the server does 
the following: 

 - If K is unique and has no nullable parts, it returns R;
 - Otherwise, if any field in the before image that is part of K
   is null do an index scan;
 - If there is no NULL field in the BI part of K, then return R.

A side change: renamed the existing test case file and added a
test case covering the changes in this patch.
2010-06-02 23:26:12 +01:00
Luis Soares
4ed6fc0457 BUG 52868: automerged bzr bundle from bug report. 2010-05-20 00:50:42 +01:00
Alfranio Correia
89850be0f5 BUG#53560 CREATE TEMP./DROP TEMP. are not binglogged correctly after a failed statement
This patch fixes two problems described as follows:

1 - If there is an on-going transaction and a temporary table is created or
dropped, any failed statement that follows the "create" or "drop commands"
triggers a rollback and by consequence the slave will go out sync because
the binary log will have a wrong sequence of events.

To fix the problem, we changed the expression that evaluates when the
cache should be flushed after either the rollback of a statment or
transaction.

2 - When a "CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE SELECT * FROM" was executed the
OPTION_KEEP_LOG was not set into the thd->options. For that reason, if
the transaction had updated only transactional engines and was rolled
back at the end (.e.g due to a deadlock) the changes were not written
to the binary log, including the creation of the temporary table.
      
To fix the problem, we have set the OPTION_KEEP_LOG into the thd->options
when a "CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE SELECT * FROM" is executed.
2010-05-19 18:01:12 +01:00
Luis Soares
60ff8469a0 BUG#49522: Replication problem with mixed MyISAM/InnoDB
When using a non-transactional table (t1) on the master 
and with autocommit disabled, no COMMIT is recorded 
in the binary log ending the statement. Therefore, if 
the slave has t1 in a transactional engine, then it will 
be as if a transaction is started but never ends. This is
actually BUG#29288 all over again.

We fix this by cherrypicking the cset for BUG#29288 which
was pushed to a later mysql version. The revision picked
was: mats@sun.com-20090923094343-bnheplq8n95opjay .

Additionally, a test case for covering the scenario depicted
in the bug report is included in this cset.
2010-05-07 18:48:35 +01:00
Luis Soares
ddb5d63346 BUG#52868: Wrong handling of NULL value during update, replication out
of sync

In RBR, sometimes the table->s->last_null_bit_pos can be zero. This
has impact at the slave when it compares records fetched from the
storage engine against records in the binary log event. If
last_null_bit_pos is zero the slave, while comparing in
log_event.cc:record_compare function, would set all bits in the last
null_byte to 1 (assumed all 8 were unused) . Thence it would loose the
ability to distinguish records that were similar in contents except
for the fact that some field was null in one record, but not in the
other. Ultimately this would cause wrong matches, and in the specific
case depicted in the bug report the same record would be updated
twice, resulting in a lost update.

Additionally, in the record_compare function the slave was setting the
X bit unconditionally. There are cases that the X bit does not exist
in the record header. This could also lead to wrong matches between
records.

We fix both by conditionally resetting the bits: (i) unused null_bits
are set if last_null_bit_pos > 0; (ii) X bit is set if
HA_OPTION_PACK_RECORD is in use.
2010-04-21 13:47:55 +01:00
2049d1afc0 Bug #50407 mysqlbinlog --database=X produces bad output for SAVEPOINTs
When mysqlbinlog was given the --database=X flag, it always printed
'ROLLBACK TO', but the corresponding 'SAVEPOINT' statement was not
printed. The replicated filter(replicated-do/ignore-db) and binlog
filter (binlog-do/ignore-db) has the same problem. They are solved
in this patch together.

After this patch, We always check whether the query is 'SAVEPOINT'
statement or not. Because this is a literal check, 'SAVEPOINT' and
'ROLLBACK TO' statements are also binlogged in uppercase with no
any comments.

The binlog before this patch can be handled correctly except one case
that any comments are in front of the keywords. for example:
 /* bla bla */ SAVEPOINT a;
 /* bla bla */ ROLLBACK TO a;
2010-03-28 19:57:33 +08:00
Mats Kindahl
c14807a21a Merging with mysql-5.1-bugteam 2010-03-17 19:15:41 +01:00
Mats Kindahl
2773758986 BUG#49618: Field length stored incorrectly in binary log
for InnoDB
            
The class Field_bit_as_char stores the metadata for the
field incorrecly because bytes_in_rec and bit_len are set
to (field_length + 7 ) / 8 and 0 respectively, while
Field_bit has the correct values field_length / 8 and
field_length % 8.
            
Solved the problem by re-computing the values for the
metadata based on the field_length instead of using the
bytes_in_rec and bit_len variables.
            
To handle compatibility with old server, a table map
flag was added to indicate that the bit computation is
exact. If the flag is clear, the slave computes the
number of bytes required to store the bit field and
compares that instead, effectively allowing replication
*without conversion* from any field length that require
the same number of bytes to store.
2010-03-17 15:28:49 +01:00
Luis Soares
0e2cc47c0c Automerge: BUG 48993 bundle from bug report --> mysql-5.1-bugteam. 2010-03-08 23:55:19 +00:00
Luis Soares
fbf595d0fb BUG#48993: valgrind errors in mysqlbinlog
I found three issues during the analysis:
 1. Memory leak caused by temp_buf not being freed;
 2. Memory leak caused when handling argv;
 3. Conditional jump that depended on unitialized values.

Issue #1
--------

  DESCRIPTION: when mysqlbinlog is reading from a remote location
  the event temp_buf references the incoming stream (in NET
  object), which is not freed by mysqlbinlog explicitly. On the
  other hand, when it is reading local binary log, it points to a
  temporary buffer that needs to be explicitly freed. For both
  cases, the temp_buf was not freed by mysqlbinlog, instead was
  set to 0.  This clearly disregards the free required in the
  second case, thence creating a memory leak.

  FIX: we make temp_buf to be conditionally freed depending on
  the value of remote_opt. Found out that similar fix is already
  in most recent codebases.

Issue #2 
--------

  DESCRIPTION: load_defaults is called by parse_args, and it
  reads default options from configuration files and put them
  BEFORE the arguments that are already in argc and argv. This is
  done resorting to MEM_ROOT. However, parse_args calls
  handle_options immediately after which changes argv. Later when
  freeing the defaults, pointers to MEM_ROOT won't match, causing
  the memory not to be freed:

  void free_defaults(char **argv)
  {
    MEM_ROOT ptr
    memcpy_fixed((char*) &ptr,(char *) argv - sizeof(ptr), sizeof(ptr));
    free_root(&ptr,MYF(0));
  }

  FIX: we remove load_defaults from parse_args and call it
  before. Then we save argv with defaults in defaults_argv BEFORE
  calling parse_args (which inside can then call handle_options
  at will). Actually, found out that this is in fact kind of a
  backport for BUG#38468 into 5.1, so I merged in the test case
  as well and added error check for load_defaults call.

  Fix based on:
  revid:zhenxing.he@sun.com-20091002081840-uv26f0flw4uvo33y


Issue #3 
--------

  DESCRIPTION: the structure st_print_event_info constructor
  would not initialize the sql_mode member, although it did for
  sql_mode_inited (set to false). This would later raise the
  warning in valgrind when printing the sql_mode in the event
  header, as this print out is protected by a check against
  sql_mode_inited and sql_mode variables. Given that sql_mode was
  not initialized valgrind would output the warning.

  FIX: we add initialization of sql_mode to the
  st_print_event_info constructor.
2010-02-17 18:07:28 +00:00
Staale Smedseng
5181551dee Bug #43414 Parenthesis (and other) warnings compiling
MySQL with gcc 4.3.2
      
This is the final patch in the context of this bug.
2010-02-22 14:23:47 +01:00
Luis Soares
d0c74a61b2 BUG#50620: Adding an index to a table prevents slave from logging
into slow log
      
While processing a statement, down the mysql_parse execution
stack, the thd->enable_slow_log can be assigned to
opt_log_slow_admin_statements, depending whether one is executing
administrative statements, such as ALTER TABLE, OPTIMIZE,
ANALYZE, etc, or not. This can have an impact on slow logging for
statements that are executed after an administrative statement
execution is completed.
      
When executing statements directly from the user this is fine
because, the thd->enable_slow_log is reset right at the beginning
of the dispatch_command function, ie, everytime a new statement
is set is set to execute.
      
On the other hand, for slave SQL thread (sql_thd) the story is a
bit different. When in SBR the sql_thd applies statements by
calling mysql_parse. Right after, it calls log_slow_statement
function to log them if they take too long. Calling mysql_parse
directly is fine, but also means that dispatch_command function
is bypassed. As a consequence, thd->enable_slow_log does not get
a chance to be reset before the next statement to be executed by
the sql_thd. If the statement just executed by the sql_thd was an
administrative statement and logging of admin statements was
disabled, this means that sql_thd->enable_slow_log will be set to
0 (disabled) from that moment on. End result: sql_thd stops
logging slow statements.
      
We fix this by resetting the value of sql_thd->enable_slow_log to
the value of opt_log_slow_slave_statements right after
log_slow_stement is called by the sql_thd.
2010-02-05 17:48:01 +00:00
Davi Arnaut
b5d307e85c Fix for compiler warnings:
Rename method as to not hide a base.
Reorder attributes initialization.
Remove unused variable.
Rework code to silence a warning due to assignment used as truth value.
2010-01-28 19:51:40 -02:00
Andrei Elkin
67b8cb0d1f bug#47142
merging patches prepared for 5.0 to 5.1-bt. That caused a few changes in the test file
2010-01-27 19:27:49 +02:00
Andrei Elkin
1c0056b3ba Bug #47142 "slave start until" stops 1 event too late in 4.1 to 5.0 replication
When replicating from 4.1 master to 5.0 slave START SLAVE UNTIL can stop too late.
The necessary in calculating of the beginning of an event the event's length
did not correspond to the master's genuine information at the event's execution time.
That piece of info was changed at the event's relay-logging due to binlog_version<4 event
conversion by IO thread.

Fixed with storing the master genuine Query_log_event size into a new status
variable at relay-logging of the event. The stored info is extacted at the event
execution and participate further to caclulate the correct start position of the event
in the until-pos stopping routine.
The new status variable's algorithm will be only active when the event comes
from the master of version < 5.0 (binlog_version < 4).
2010-01-25 17:46:48 +02:00
He Zhenxing
6bf8c119fe Backport Bug#37148 to 5.1 2010-01-24 15:03:23 +08:00
Luis Soares
22cff39274 Fix for BUG#49481 and BUG#49482 reverted.
PB2 run uncovered issue that needs further analysis.
2010-01-19 00:10:00 +00:00
Luis Soares
a0a5152fb3 Fix for BUG#49481 and BUG#49482.
BUG#49481: RBR: MyISAM and bit fields may cause slave to stop on delete: 
cant find record
      
BUG#49482: RBR: Replication may break on deletes when MyISAM tables + 
char field are used

When using MyISAM tables, despite the fact that the null bit is
set for some fields, their old value is still in the row. This
can cause the comparison of records to fail when the slave is
doing an index or range scan.

We fix this by avoiding memcmp for MyISAM tables when comparing
records. Additionally, when comparing field by field, we first
check if both fields are not null and if so, then we compare
them. If just one field is null we return failure immediately. If
both fields are null, we move on to the next field.
2010-01-14 14:26:51 +00:00
Luis Soares
36a4772e2d BUG#50018: automerge from 5.1-bt local --> 5.1-bt local latest. 2010-01-14 10:47:23 +00:00
917024b2e9 Bug #49137 Replication failure on SBR/MBR + multi-table DROP TEMPORARY TABLE
Fixed valgrind failure on PB2.
2010-01-06 13:28:06 +08:00
fd931d7bf7 Bug #49137 Replication failure on SBR/MBR + multi-table DROP TEMPORARY TABLE
Fixed valgrind failure on PB2.
2010-01-06 13:12:40 +08:00
7e2078c995 Bug #49137 Replication failure on SBR/MBR + multi-table DROP TEMPORARY TABLE
Fixed valgrind failure on PB2.
2010-01-06 10:44:14 +08:00
cae9c79772 Bug #49137 Replication failure on SBR/MBR + multi-table DROP TEMPORARY TABLE
Fixed valgrind failure on PB2.
2010-01-06 10:36:29 +08:00
Luis Soares
4923b4157c BUG#50018: binlog corruption when table has many columns
For tables with metadata sizes ranging from 251 to 255 the size
of the event data (m_data_size) was being improperly calculated
in the Table_map_log_event constructor. This was due to the fact
that when writing the Table_map_log_event body (in
Table_map_log_event::write_data_body) a call to net_store_length
is made for packing the m_field_metadata_size. It happens that
net_store_length uses *one* byte for storing
m_field_metadata_size when it is smaller than 251 but *three*
bytes when it exceeds that value. BUG 42749 had already
pinpointed and fix this fact, but the fix was incomplete, as the
calculation in the Table_map_log_event constructor considers 255
instead of 251 as the threshold to increment m_data_size by
three. Thence, the window for having a mismatch between the
number of bytes written and the number of bytes accounted in the
event length (m_data_size) was left open for
m_field_metadata_size values between 251 and 255.

We fix this by changing the condition in the Table_map_log_event
constructor to match the one in the net_store_length, ie,
increment one byte if m_field_metadata_size < 251 and three if it
exceeds this value.
2010-01-06 00:44:31 +00:00
dbe02e6d4a Bug #49137 Replication failure on SBR/MBR + multi-table DROP TEMPORARY TABLE
In statement-based or mixed-mode replication, use DROP TEMPORARY TABLE
to drop multiple tables causes different errors on master and slave, 
when one or more of these tables do not exist. Because when executed
on slave, it would automatically add IF EXISTS to the query to ignore
all ER_BAD_TABLE_ERROR errors.

To fix the problem, do not add IF EXISTS when executing DROP TEMPORARY
TABLE on the slave, and clear the ER_BAD_TABLE_ERROR error after
execution if the query does not expect any errors.
2009-12-31 12:04:19 +08:00
ccc3a46856 Bug #49137 Replication failure on SBR/MBR + multi-table DROP TEMPORARY TABLE
In statement-based or mixed-mode replication, use DROP TEMPORARY TABLE
to drop multiple tables causes different errors on master and slave, 
when one or more of these tables do not exist. Because when executed
on slave, it would automatically add IF EXISTS to the query to ignore
all ER_BAD_TABLE_ERROR errors.

To fix the problem, do not add IF EXISTS when executing DROP TEMPORARY
TABLE on the slave, and clear the ER_BAD_TABLE_ERROR error after
execution if the query does not expect any errors.
2009-12-31 11:33:10 +08:00
aa38825287 Bug #34628 LOAD DATA CONCURRENT INFILE drops CONCURRENT in binary log
'LOAD DATA CONCURRENT [LOCAL] INFILE ...' statment only is binlogged as
'LOAD DATA [LOCAL] INFILE ...' in SBR and MBR.  As a result, if replication is on, 
queries on slaves will be blocked by the replication SQL thread.

This patch write code to write 'CONCURRENT' into the log event if 'CONCURRENT' option
is in the original statement in SBR and MBR.
2009-12-15 13:14:14 +08:00
Luis Soares
514f4814d5 Automerge bzr bundle in bug report into local mysql-5.1-bugteam latest. 2009-12-07 00:28:14 +00:00
Luis Soares
1ee79014e3 Automerge bzr bundle from bug report.
Removed rpl_cross_version from experimental list.
2009-12-06 23:36:07 +00:00
Luis Soares
2390a0cd03 BUG#48340: rpl_cross_version: Found warnings/errors in server log file!
Valgrind reports a conditional jump that depends on uninitialized
data while doing a LOAD DATA and for this test case only. This
test case, tests that loading data from a 4.0 or 4.1 instance
into a 5.1 instance is working. As such it handles old binary log
with a different set of events than currently 5.1 codebase uses.
See the following reference for details:

http://forge.mysql.com/wiki/MySQL_Internals_Binary_Log#LOAD_DATA_INFILE_Events

Problem:
 
 The server is handling an Execute_load_log_event, which results
 in reading a Load_log_event from the binary log and applying
 it. When applying the Load_log_event, some variable setup is
 done and then mysql_load is called. Late in mysql_load
 execution, if not in row mode logging, the event is
 binlogged write_execute_load_query_log_event.

 In write_execute_load_query_log_event, thd->lex->local_file is
 inspected. The problem is that it has not been set before in the
 execution stack. This causes valgrind to report the warning.

Fix: 
  
 We fix this by initializing thd->lex->local_file to be the same
 as the value of Load_log_event::local_fname, when lex_start is
 called inside Load_log_event::do_apply_event.
2009-11-24 20:04:02 +00:00
Alfranio Correia
7c9503b75e merge 5.1-bugteam (local) --> 5.1-bugteam 2009-11-21 13:02:18 +00:00
Luis Soares
c8df6e8d4b BUG#48357: SHOW BINLOG EVENTS: Wrong offset or I/O error
In function log_event.cc:Query_log_event::write, there was a cast that
was triggering undefined behavior. The offending cast is the
following:

  write_str_with_code_and_len((char **)(&start),
                              catalog, catalog_len, Q_CATALOG_NZ_CODE);

This results in calling write_str_with_code_and_len with first
argument pointing to a (char **) while "start" is itself a pointer to
uchar (uchar *). Inside write_str_with_..., the content of start is
then be updated:

  (*dst)+= len;

The instruction above would cause the (*dst) pointer (ie, the "start"
argument, from the caller point of view, and which actually points to
uchar instead of pointing to char) to be updated so that it would
increment catalog_len. However, this seems to break strict-aliasing
rules ultimately causing the increment and assignment to behave
unexpectedly.

We fix this by removing the cast and by making the types match.
2009-11-09 17:36:13 +00:00
Alfranio Correia
4f164c4c5a BUG#48091 valgrind errors when slave has double not null and master has double null
Backporting BUG#43789 to mysql-5.1-bugteam
                              
The replication was generating corrupted data, warning messages on Valgrind
and aborting on debug mode while replicating a "null" to "not null" field.
Specifically the unpack_row routine, was considering the slave's table
definition and trying to retrieve a field value, where there was nothing to be
retrieved, ignoring the fact that the value was defined as "null" by the master.
                              
To fix the problem, we proceed as follows:
                              
1 - If it is not STRICT sql_mode, implicit default values are used, regardless
if it is multi-row or single-row statement.
                              
2 - However, if it is STRICT mode, then a we do what follows:
                              
2.1 If it is a transactional engine, we do a rollback on the first NULL that is
to be set into a NOT NULL column and return an error.
                              
2.2 If it is a non-transactional engine and it is the first row to be inserted
with multi-row, we also return the error. Otherwise, we proceed with the
execution, use implicit default values and print out warning messages.
                        
Unfortunately, the current patch cannot mimic the behavior showed by the master
for updates on multi-tables and multi-row inserts. This happens because such
statements are unfolded in different row events. For instance, considering the
following updates and strict mode:
                        
(master)
create table t1 (a int);
create table t2 (a int not null);
insert into t1 values (1);
insert into t2 values (2);
update t1, t2 SET t1.a=10, t2.a=NULL;
                        
t1 would have (10) and t2 would have (0) as this would be handled as a
multi-row update. On the other hand, if we had the following updates:
                        
(master)
create table t1 (a int);
create table t2 (a int);
                        
(slave)
create table t1 (a int);
create table t2 (a int not null);
                        
(master)
insert into t1 values (1);
insert into t2 values (2);
update t1, t2 SET t1.a=10, t2.a=NULL;
                        
On the master t1 would have (10) and t2 would have (NULL). On
the slave, t1 would have (10) but the update on t1 would fail.
2009-10-22 01:15:45 +01:00