- TABLE::create_key_part_by_field() should not set PART_KEY_FLAG in field->flags
= The reason is that it is used by hash join code which calls it to create a hash
table lookup structure. It doesn't create a real index.
= Another caller of the function is TABLE::add_tmp_key(). Made it to set the flag itself.
- The differences in join_cache.result could also be observed before this patch: one
could put "FLUSH TABLES" before the queries and get exactly the same difference.
IS [NOT] NULL predicate is sargable within an outer join. Range
analysis only uses predicates from ON expressions, which have
regular semantics (without null-complemented rows, etc).
There is no reason not use IS [NOT] NULL predicates.
When a non-nullable datetime field is used under an IS NULL predicate
of the WHERE condition in a query with outer joins the remove_eq_conds
function should check whether this field belongs to an inner table
of any outer join that can be, in a general case, a nested outer join.
When in function remove_eq_conds() a sub-formula of the processed condition
is replaced for another formula we should ensure that in the resulting
formula AND/OR levels must alternate.
- Modify the way Item_cond::fix_fields() and Item_cond::eval_not_null_tables()
calculate bitmap for Item_cond_or::not_null_tables():
if they see a "... OR inexpensive_const_false_item OR ..." then the item can
be ignored.
- Updated test results. There can be more warnings produced since parts of WHERE
are evaluated more times.
When iterating over a list of conditions using List_iterator
the function remove_eq_conds should skip all predicates that
replace a condition from the list. Otherwise it can come to
an infinite recursion.
INCORRECT RESULTS
This is a backport of fix for Bug#13068506.
mysql-test/r/join_outer.result:
Added test result for Bug#13068506
mysql-test/t/join_outer.test:
Added test case for Bug#13068506
sql/item.h:
Implement Item_outer_ref::not_null_tables()
The not_null_tables() of Item_func_not_all and Item_in_optimizer was inherited from
Item_func by mistake. It made the optimizer think that subquery
predicates with ALL/ANY/IN were null-rejecting. This could trigger invalid
conversions of outer joins into inner joins.
mysql-test/suite/innodb/t/group_commit_crash.test:
remove autoincrement to avoid rbr being used for insert ... select
mysql-test/suite/innodb/t/group_commit_crash_no_optimize_thread.test:
remove autoincrement to avoid rbr being used for insert ... select
mysys/my_addr_resolve.c:
a pointer to a buffer is returned to the caller -> the buffer cannot be on the stack
mysys/stacktrace.c:
my_vsnprintf() is ok here, in 5.5
This bug appeared after the patch for bug 939009 that in the
function merge_key_fields forgot to reset a proper value for
the val field in the result of the merge operation of the key
field created for a regular key access and the key field
created to look for a NULL key.
Adjusted the results of the test case for bug 939009 that
actually were incorrect.
IS EXECUTED TWICE FROM P
This bug is a duplicate of bug 12567331, which was pushed to the
optimizer backporting tree on 2011-06-11. This is just a back-port of
the fix. Both test cases are included as they differ somewhat.
sql/sql_insert.cc:
CREATE ... IF NOT EXISTS may do nothing, but
it is still not a failure. don't forget to my_ok it.
******
CREATE ... IF NOT EXISTS may do nothing, but
it is still not a failure. don't forget to my_ok it.
sql/sql_table.cc:
small cleanup
******
small cleanup
of the 5.3 code line after a merge with 5.2 on 2010-10-28
in order not to allow the cost to access a joined table to be equal
to 0 ever.
Expanded data sets for many test cases to get the same execution plans
as before.
For any query JOIN::optimize() should call the method
SELECT::save_leaf_tables after the last transformation
that utilizes the statement memory rather than the
execution memory.
This bug is a special case of lp:813447.
Analysis:
Constant optimization finds that the condition t2.a = 1
can be used to access the primary key of table 't2'. As
a result both outer table t1,t2 are considered as constant
when we reach the execution phase. At the same time, during
constant optimization, the IN predicate is not evaluated
because it is expensive.
When execution of the outer query reaches do_select(),
control flow enter the branch:
if (join->table_count == join->const_tables)
{ ... }
This branch checks only the WHERE and HAVING clauses,
but doesn't check the ON clauses of the query. Since the
IN predicate was not evaluated during optimization, it is
not evaluated at all, thus execution doesn't detect that
the ON clause is FALSE.
Solution:
Similar to the patch for bug lp:813447, exclude system
tables from constant substitution based on unique key
lookups if there is an expensive ON condition on the
inner table.
in combination with IS NULL'
As this bug is a duplicate of bug#49322, it also includes test cases
covering this bugreport
Qualifying an OUTER JOIN with the condition 'WHERE <column> IS NULL',
where <column> is declared as 'NOT NULL' causes the
'not_exists_optimize' to be enabled by the optimizer.
In evaluate_join_record() the 'not_exists_optimize' caused
'NESTED_LOOP_NO_MORE_ROWS' to be returned immediately
when a matching row was found.
However, as the 'not_exists_optimize' is derived from
'JOIN_TAB::select_cond', the usual rules for condition guards
also applies for 'not_exist_optimize'. It is therefore incorrect
to check 'not_exists_optimize' without ensuring that all guards
protecting it is 'open'.
This fix uses the fact that 'not_exists_optimize' is derived from
a 'is_null' predicate term in 'tab->select_cond'. Furthermore,
'is_null' will evaluate to 'false' for any 'non-null' rows
once all guards protecting the is_null is open.
We can use this knowledge as an implicit guard check for the
'not_exists_optimize' by moving 'if (...not_exists_optimize)'
inside the handling of 'select_cond==false'. It will then
not take effect before its guards are open.
We also add an assert which requires that a
'not_exists_optimize' always comes together with
a select_cond. (containing 'is_null').
Item_equal::val_int() checked for NULL-values by checking Item::null_value
*before* the respective ::store_value() and ::cmp(Item*) metods where called.
As Item::null_value is set by these metods, the value of 'null_value'
is not valid until *after* ::store_value() or ::cmp() has
been called for the Item object.
Fix is to swap order of ::store_value()/::cmp() and checking of Item::null_value.
This pattern is widely used other places inside item_cmpfunc.cc .
