Attempts to execute RESET statements within a transaction that
had acquired metadata locks, led to an assertion failure on
debug servers. This bug didn't cause any problems on release
builds.
The triggered assert is designed to check that caches are not
flushed or reset while having active transactions. It is triggered
if acquired metadata locks exist that are not from LOCK TABLE or
HANDLER statements.
In this case it was triggered by RESET QUERY CACHE while having
an active transaction that had acquired locks. The reason the
assertion was triggered, was that RESET statements, unlike the
similar FLUSH statements, was not causing an implicit commit.
This patch fixes the problem by making sure RESET statements
commit the current transaction before executing. The commit
causes acquired metadata locks to be released, preventing the
assertion from being triggered.
Incompatible change: This patch changes RESET statements so
that they cause an implicit commit.
Test case added to query_cache.test.
Detailed revision comments:
r6538 | sunny | 2010-01-30 00:43:06 +0200 (Sat, 30 Jan 2010) | 6 lines
branches/5.1: Check *first_value every time against the column max
value and set *first_value to next autoinc if it's > col max value.
ie. not rely on what is passed in from MySQL.
[49497] Error 1467 (ER_AUTOINC_READ_FAILED) on inserting a negative value
rb://236
Detailed revision comments:
r6536 | sunny | 2010-01-30 00:13:42 +0200 (Sat, 30 Jan 2010) | 6 lines
branches/5.1: Check *first_value everytime against the column max
value and set *first_value to next autoinc if it's > col max value.
ie. not rely on what is passed in from MySQL.
[49497] Error 1467 (ER_AUTOINC_READ_FAILED) on inserting a negative value
rb://236
Propagation of a large unsigned numeric constant
in the WHERE expression led to wrong result.
For example,
"WHERE a = CAST(0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF AS USIGNED) AND FOO(a)",
where a is an UNSIGNED BIGINT, and FOO() accepts strings,
was transformed to "... AND FOO('-1')".
That has been fixed.
Also EXPLAIN EXTENDED printed incorrect numeric constants in
transformed WHERE expressions like above. That has been
fixed too.
bool MDL_context::try_acquire_lock(MDL_request*)
This assert was triggered in the following way:
1) HANDLER OPEN t1 from connection 1
2) DROP TABLE t1 from connection 2. This will block due to the metadata lock
held by the open handler in connection 1.
3) DML statement (e.g. INSERT) from connection 1. This will close the table
opened by the HANDLER in 1) and release its metadata lock. This is done due
to the pending exclusive metadata lock from 2).
4) DROP TABLE t1 from connection 2 now completes and removes table t1.
5) HANDLER READ from connection 1. Since the handler table was closed in 3),
the handler code will try to reopen the table. First a new metadata lock on
t1 will be granted before the command fails since the table was removed in 4).
6) HANDLER READ from connection 1. This caused the assert.
The reason for the assert was that the MDL_request's pointer to the lock
ticket was not reset when the statement failed. HANDLER READ then tried to
acquire a lock using the same MDL_request object, triggering the assert.
This bug was only noticeable on debug builds and did not cause any problems
on release builds.
This patch fixes the problem by assuring that the pointer to the metadata
lock ticket is reset when reopening of handler tables fails.
Test case added to handler.inc
The problem was in an incorrect debug assertion. The expression
used in the failing assertion states that when finding
references matching ORDER BY expressions, there can be only one
reference to a single table. But that does not make any sense,
all test cases for this bug are valid examples with multiple
identical WHERE expressions referencing the same table which
are also present in the ORDER BY list.
Fixed by removing the failing assertion. We also have to take
care of the 'found' counter so that we count multiple
references only once. We rely on this fact later in
eq_ref_table().
The task is to
(a) add a comment on indexes and
(b) increase the maximum length of column, table and the new index comments.
The patch committed on behalf of Yoshinori Matsunobu (Yoshinori.Matsunobu@Sun.COM).
When EXPLAIN EXTENDED tries to print column names, it checks whether the
referenced table is CONST (in which case, the column's value rather than
its name will be printed). If no proper table is reference (i.e. because
a derived table was used that has since gone out of scope), this will fail
spectacularly.
This ports an equivalent of the fix for Bug 43354.
CHECK_FIELD_IGNORE was treated as CHECK_FIELD_ERROR_FOR_NULL;
UPDATE...SET...NULL on NOT NULL fields behaved differently after
a trigger.
Now distinguishes between IGNORE and ERROR_FOR_NULL and save/restores
check-field options.
an INFORMATION_SCHEMA table
When a prepared statement using a merged view containing an information
schema table was executed, a metadata lock of the view was not taken.
This meant that it was possible for concurrent view DDL to execute,
thereby breaking the binary log. For example, it was possible
for DROP VIEW to appear in the binary log before a query using the view.
This also happened when a statement in a stored routine was executed a
second time.
For such views, the information schema table is merged into the view
during the prepare phase (or first execution of a statement in a routine).
The problem was that we took a short cut and were not executing full-blown
view opening during subsequent executions of the statement. As a result,
a metadata lock on the view was not taken to protect the view definition.
This patch resolves the problem by making sure a metadata lock is taken
for views even after information schema tables are merged into them.
Test cased added to view.test.
Table corruption happens during table reading in ha_tina::find_current_row() func.
Field::store() method returns error(true) if stored value is 0.
The fix:
added special case for enum type which correctly processes 0 value.
Additional fix:
INSERT...(default) and INSERT...() have the same behaviour now for enum type.
The problem was that a shared InnoDB row lock was taken when executing
SELECT statements inside a stored function as a part of a transaction
using REPEATABLE READ. This prevented other transactions from updating
the row.
InnoDB uses multi-versioning and consistent nonlocking reads. SELECTs
should therefore not acquire locks and block other transactions
wishing to do updates.
This bug is no longer repeatable with the changes introduced in the scope
of metadata locking.
Test case added to innodb_mysql.test.
WL#5154 was a task for formally deprecating and removing items that
were mentioned in the manual as having been deprecated since MySQL
4.1 or 5.0, but that had never been removed.
Since WL#5154 was created, examination of mysqld.cc, mysql.cc, and
mysqldump.c reveals additional deprecations not mentioned in the
manual. (In some cases, the items are simply not mentioned in the
5.1+ manuals.)
This is a follow-on task to deprecate and remove these additional
items.
The deprecation happened in MySQL 5.1, and the options/variables
are now removed from the code.
