Commit graph

515 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
michael.izioumtchenko@oracle.com
0fdc37cad0 Bug#16405422 - RECOVERY FAILURE, ASSERT !RECV_NO_LOG_WRITE
eliminate a race condition over recv_sys->n_addrs which might result in a database corruption
in recovery, without reporting a recovery error.

recv_recover_page_func(): move the code segment that decrements recv_sys->n_addrs
  to the end of the function, after the call to mtr_commit()

rb://2282 approved by Inaam
2013-04-30 20:39:12 +02:00
Annamalai Gurusami
300496975d Bug #15973904 INNODB PARTITION CODE HOLDS LOCK_OPEN AND SLEEPS WHILE
OPENING MISSING PARTITION

In the ha_innobase::open() call, for normal tables, there is no retry logic.
But for partitioned tables, there is a retry logic introduced as fix for:

http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=33349  
https://support.mysql.com/view.php?id=21080

The Bug#33349, does not provide sufficient information to analyze the original
problem.  The original problem reported by bug#33349 is also minor (just an
annoyance and no loss of functionality).  Most importantly, the retry logic
has been introduced without any associated test case.

So we are removing the retry logic for partitioned tables.  When the original
problem occurs, a different solution will be explored.
2013-04-24 08:47:30 +02:00
Annamalai Gurusami
b00e1446dd Bug #16244691 SERVER GONE AWAY ERROR OCCURS DEPENDING ON THE NUMBER OF
TABLE/KEY RELATIONS

The DICT_FK_MAX_RECURSIVE_LOAD was reduced from 250 to 33 in rb#2058.
But in optimized build, this recursive depth is still too deep and
resulted in stack overflow.  So reducing this depth to 20 now.
2013-03-29 22:01:10 +05:30
Annamalai Gurusami
9d7f333a62 Bug #16244691 SERVER GONE AWAY ERROR OCCURS DEPENDING ON THE NUMBER OF
TABLE/KEY RELATIONS

Problem:

When there are many tables, linked together through the foreign key
constraints, then loading one table will recursively open other tables.  This
can sometimes lead to thread stack overflow.  In such situations the server
will exit.

I see the stack overflow problem when the thread_stack is 196608 (the default
value for 32-bit systems).  I don't see the problem when the thread_stack is
set to 262144 (the default value for 64-bit systems).

Solution:

Currently, in InnoDB, there is a macro DICT_FK_MAX_RECURSIVE_LOAD which defines
the maximum number of tables that will be loaded recursively because of foreign
key relations.  This is currently set to 250.  We can reduce this number to 33
(anything more than 33 does not solve the problem for the default value).  We
can keep it small enough so that thread stack overflow does not happen for the
default values.  Reducing the DICT_FK_MAX_RECURSIVE_LOAD will not affect the
functionality of InnoDB.  The tables will eventually be loaded. 

rb#2058 approved by Marko
2013-03-28 10:42:42 +05:30
Murthy Narkedimilli
d20a70fb55 Bug 16395495 - OLD FSF ADDRESS IN GPL HEADER 2013-03-19 13:29:12 +01:00
Annamalai Gurusami
b39370bc93 Bug #11753153 INNODB GENERATES SYMBOLS THAT ARE TOO LONG, INVALID DDL
FROM SHOW CREATE

Problem: The length of the internally generated foreign key name 
is not checked. 

Solution: The length of the internally generated foreign key name is
checked.  If it is greater than the allowed limit, an error message
is reported. Also, the constraint name is printed in the same manner
as the table name, using the system charset information.

rb://1969 approved by Marko.
2013-02-12 14:52:48 +05:30
Marko Mäkelä
97c7996e89 Bug#16292043 RACE CONDITION IN SRV_EXPORT_INNODB_STATUS() WHEN ACCESSING PURGE_SYS->VIEW
srv_export_innodb_status(): Read the purge_sys fields while holding
purge_sys->latch.

Approved by Sunny Bains
2013-02-08 09:22:46 +02:00
Krunal Bauskar krunal.bauskar@oracle.com
e47f3943f9 - BUG#1608883: KILLING A QUERY INSIDE INNODB CAUSES IT TO EVENTUALLY CRASH
WITH AN ASSERTION

  Recently we added check to handle kill query signal for long operating
  queries. 
  While the query interruption is reported it must to ensure cursor is restore
  to proper state for HANDLER interface to work correctly. 
  Normal select query will not face this problem, as on recieving interrupt,
  select query is aborted and new select query result in re-initialization
  (including cursor).

  rb://1836. Approved by Marko.
2013-01-14 10:49:51 +05:30
Sunny Bains
d77f5c79e5 Bug#13997024 SEGV IN SYNC_ARRAY_CELL_PRINT PRINTING OUT LONG SEMAPHORE WAIT DATA
Backport fix from mysql-5.6.
2013-01-10 10:01:50 +11:00
Yasufumi Kinoshita
47619514f5 Bug#59354 : Bug #12659252 : ASSERT !OTHER_LOCK AT LOCK_REC_ADD_TO_QUEUE DURING A DELETE OPERATION
The converted implicit lock should wait for the prior conflicting lock if found.

rb://1437 approved by Marko
2012-11-28 17:05:23 +09:00
Yasufumi Kinoshita
4c423016fa Bug #14676111 WRONG PAGE_LEVEL WRITTEN FOR UPPER THAN FATHER PAGE AT BTR_LIFT_PAGE_UP()
btr_lift_page_up() writes wrong page number (different by -1) for upper than father page.
But in almost all of the cases, the father page should be root page, no upper
pages. It is very rare path.

In addition the leaf page should not be lifted unless the father page is root.
Because the branch pages should not become the leaf pages.

rb://1336 approved by Marko Makela.
2012-11-12 22:31:30 +09:00
Marko Mäkelä
48519303e8 Bug#14758405: ALTER TABLE: ADDING SERIAL NULL DATATYPE: ASSERTION:
LEN <= SIZEOF(ULONGLONG)

This bug was caught in the WL#6255 ALTER TABLE...ADD COLUMN in MySQL
5.6, but there is a bug in all InnoDB versions that support
auto-increment columns.

row_search_autoinc_read_column(): When reading the maximum value of
the auto-increment column, and the column only contains NULL values,
return 0. This corresponds to the case when the table is empty in
row_search_max_autoinc().

rb:1415 approved by Sunny Bains
2012-10-18 17:03:06 +03:00
Krunal Bauskar krunal.bauskar@oracle.com
c8cebffdbd bug#14704286
SECONDARY INDEX UPDATES MAKE CONSISTENT READS DO O(N^2) UNDO PAGE
LOOKUPS (honoring kill query while accessing sec_index)

If secondary index is being used for select query evaluation and this
query is operating with consistent read snapshot it might take good time for
secondary index to return back control to mysql as MVCC would kick in.

If user issues "kill query <id>" while query is actively accessing
secondary index it will not be honored as there is no hook to check
for this condition. Added hook for this check.

-----
Parallely secondary index taking too long to evaluate for consistent
read snapshot case is being examined for performance improvement. WL#6540.
2012-10-15 09:24:33 +05:30
Vasil Dimov
b1bb5d8cb9 Fix compilation error in debug mode:
os/os0file.c:1332: error: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code
2012-10-10 22:22:10 +03:00
Vasil Dimov
f4c0571679 Port the test for Bug#14708715 from 5.1/innodb_plugin into 5.1/innodb
although the bug does not exist in 5.1/innodb.
2012-10-09 16:29:00 +03:00
Marko Mäkelä
be509b41aa Bug#14731482 UPDATE OR DELETE CORRUPTS A RECORD WITH A LONG PRIMARY KEY
We did not allocate enough bits for index->trx_id_offset, causing an
UPDATE or DELETE of a table with a PRIMARY KEY longer than 1024 bytes
to corrupt the PRIMARY KEY.

dict_index_t: Allocate enough bits.

dict_index_build_internal_clust(): Check for overflow of
index->trx_id_offset. Trip a debug assertion when overflow occurs.

rb:1380 approved by Jimmy Yang
2012-10-08 16:01:50 +03:00
Annamalai Gurusami
91c8a65a80 Bug #13249921 ASSERT !BPAGE->FILE_PAGE_WAS_FREED, USUALLY IN
TRANSACTION ROLLBACK

Description:  During the rollback operation, a blob page 
is removed earlier than desired.  Consider following scenario:

1. create table t1(a int primary key,b blob) engine=innodb;
2. insert into t1 values (1,repeat('b',9000));
3. begin;
4. update t1 set b=concat(b,'b');
5. update t1 set a=a+1;
6. insert into t1 values (1,repeat('b',9000));
7. rollback;

The update operation in line 5 produces 2 undo log record. The first
undo record (TRX_UNDO_DEL_MARK_REC) goes to trx->update_undo and the
second undo record (TRX_UNDO_INSERT_REC) goes to trx->insert_undo.
During rollback, they are executed out of order.

When the undo record TRX_UNDO_DEL_MARK_REC is applied/executed,
the blob ownership is also reset.  Because of this the blob page
is released earlier than desired.  This blob page must have been
freed only as part of applying/executing the undo record
TRX_UNDO_INSERT_REC.

This problem can be avoided by executing the undo records in
order.  This patch will make innodb to execute the undo records
in order.

rb://1125 approved by Marko.
2012-09-28 16:02:58 +05:30
Marko Mäkelä
aed6b87145 Bug#14636528 INNODB CHANGE BUFFERING IS NOT ENTIRELY CRASH-SAFE
Delete-mark change buffer records when resorting to a pessimistic
delete from the change buffer B-tree. Skip delete-marked records in
the change buffer merge and when estimating whether an operation can
be buffered. Without this fix, we could try to apply the same buffered
changes multiple times if the server was killed at the right moment.

In MySQL 5.5 and later: ibuf_get_volume_buffered_count_func(): Ignore
delete-marked (already processed) records.

ibuf_delete_rec(): Add a crash point before optimistic delete. If the
optimistic delete fails, flag the record processed before
mtr_commit().

ibuf_merge_or_delete_for_page(): Ignore delete-marked (already
processed) records.

Backport to 5.1: Rename btr_cur_del_unmark_for_ibuf() to
btr_cur_set_deleted_flag_for_ibuf() and add a parameter.

rb:1307 approved by Jimmy Yang
2012-09-19 22:35:38 +03:00
Jorgen Loland
95b4747356 Bug#14547952: DEBUG BUILD FAILS ASSERTION IN RECORDS_IN_RANGE()
ha_innobase::records_in_range(): Remove a debug assertion
that prohibits an open range (full table).
This assertion catches unnecessary calls to this method, 
but such calls are not harming correctness.
2012-08-28 14:51:01 +02:00
Marko Mäkelä
e0482cb0bc Bug#14399148 INNODB TABLES UNDER LOAD PRODUCE DUPLICATE COPIES OF ROWS
IN QUERIES

This bug was caused by an incorrect fix of
Bug#13807811 BTR_PCUR_RESTORE_POSITION() CAN SKIP A RECORD

There was nothing wrong with btr_pcur_restore_position(), but with the
use of it in the table scan during index creation.

rb:1206 approved by Jimmy Yang
2012-08-09 09:55:29 +03:00
Jon Olav Hauglid
4358669767 Bug#14238406 NEW COMPILATION WARNINGS WITH GCC 4.7 (-WERROR=NARROWING)
This patch fixes various compilation warnings of the type
"error: narrowing conversion of 'x' from 'datatype1' to
'datatype2'
2012-06-29 13:25:57 +02:00
Annamalai Gurusami
08f360703f Bug #13933132: [ERROR] GOT ERROR -1 WHEN READING TABLE APPEARED
WHEN KILLING

Suppose there is a query waiting for a lock.  If the user kills
this query, then "Got error -1 when reading table" error message
must not be logged in the server log file.  Since this is a user
requested interruption, no spurious error message must be logged
in the server log.  This patch will remove the error message from
the log.

approved by joh and tatjana
2012-06-01 14:12:57 +05:30
Annamalai Gurusami
b76a59f5a6 Bug #14007649 65111: INNODB SOMETIMES FAILS TO UPDATE ROWS INSERTED
BY A CONCURRENT TRANSACTIO

The member function QUICK_RANGE_SELECT::init_ror_merged_scan() performs
a table handler clone. Innodb does not provide a clone operation.  
The ha_innobase::clone() is not there. The handler::clone() does not 
take care of the ha_innobase->prebuilt->select_lock_type.  Because of 
this what happens is that for one index we do a locking read, and 
for the other index we were doing a non-locking (consistent) read. 
The patch introduces ha_innobase::clone() member function.  
It is implemented similar to ha_myisam::clone().  It calls the 
base class handler::clone() and then does any additional operation 
required.  I am setting the ha_innobase->prebuilt->select_lock_type 
correctly. 

rb://1060 approved by Marko
2012-05-10 10:18:31 +05:30
Sunanda Menon
d37a28c9b0 Merge from mysql-5.1.63-release 2012-05-08 07:19:14 +02:00
Yasufumi Kinoshita
d90207321b Bug#11758510 (#50723): INNODB CHECK TABLE FATAL SEMAPHORE WAIT TIMEOUT POSSIBLY TOO SHORT FOR BI
Fixed not to check timeout during the check table.
2012-04-27 19:38:13 +09:00
Georgi Kodinov
6e1c96db9a merge mysql-5.1->mysql-5.1-security 2012-04-10 14:21:57 +03:00
Sergey Glukhov
17817a3009 Bug#11766300 59387: FAILING ASSERTION: CURSOR->POS_STATE == 1997660512 (BTR_PCUR_IS_POSITIONE
Bug#13639204 64111: CRASH ON SELECT SUBQUERY WITH NON UNIQUE INDEX
The crash happened due to wrong calculation
of key length during creation of reference for
sort order index. The problem is that
keyuse->used_tables can have OUTER_REF_TABLE_BIT enabled
but used_tables parameter(create_ref_for_key() func) does
not have it. So key parts which have OUTER_REF_TABLE_BIT
are ommited and it could lead to incorrect key length
calculation(zero key length).
2012-04-04 13:29:45 +04:00
Sunny Bains
899e600b17 Merge from mysql-5.0 2012-03-28 13:35:44 +11:00
Georgi Kodinov
262c156849 merge mysql-5.1->mysql-5.1-security 2012-03-21 14:53:09 +02:00
karen.langford@oracle.com
3adb401c8a Merge from mysql-5.1.62-release 2012-03-20 17:35:41 +01:00
Annamalai Gurusami
da4418977d Bug #11766634 59783: InnoDB data grows unexpectedly when inserting,
truncating, inserting the same set of rows. When a table is 
re-created with the same set of rows, the data file size must
not grow.  

rb:968
Approved by Marko.
2012-03-09 11:07:16 +05:30
Georgi Kodinov
8232d9a6ee merge mysql-5.1->mysql-5.1-security 2012-03-08 17:16:53 +02:00
Marko Mäkelä
abadbe79a4 Fix a compiler warning about possibly uninitiaizlied variable. 2012-03-08 17:10:10 +02:00
Marko Mäkelä
76e064e209 Bug#13807811 BTR_PCUR_RESTORE_POSITION() CAN SKIP A RECORD
This bug has been there at least since MySQL 4.0.9. (Before 4.0.9, the
code probably was even more severely broken.)

btr_pcur_restore_position(): When cursor restoration fails, before
invoking btr_pcur_store_position() move to the previous or next record
unless cursor->rel_pos==BTR_PCUR_ON or the record was not a user
record.

This bug can cause skipped records when btr_pcur_store_position() is
called on the last record of a page. A symptom would be record count
mismatch in CHECK TABLE, or failure to find a record to delete-mark or
update or purge. The following operations should be affected by the
bug:

* row_search_for_mysql(): SELECT, UPDATE, REPLACE, CHECK TABLE,
  (almost anything else than INSERT)

* foreign key CASCADE operations

* row_merge_read_clustered_index(): index creation (since MySQL 5.1
  InnoDB Plugin)

* multi-threaded purge (after MySQL 5.5): not sure, but it might fail
  to purge some records

Not all callers of btr_pcur_restore_position() should be affected.
Anything that asserts or checks that restoration succeeds is
unaffected. For example, cursor restoration on the change buffer tree
should always succeed, because access is being protected by additional
latches. Likewise, rollback, or any code accesses data dictionary
tables while holding dict_sys->mutex should be safe.

rb:967 approved by Jimmy Yang
2012-03-08 14:56:22 +02:00
Annamalai Gurusami
27ecea534c Bug#13635833: MULTIPLE CRASHES IN FOREIGN KEY CODE WITH CONCURRENT DDL/DML
There are two threads.  In one thread, dml operation is going on 
involving cascaded update operation.  In another thread, alter 
table add foreign key constraint is happening.  Under these 
circumstances, it is possible for the dml thread to access a 
dict_foreign_t object that has been freed by the ddl thread.  
The debug sync test case provides the sequence of operations.  
Without fix, the test case will crash the server (because of 
newly added assert).  With fix, the alter table stmt will return 
an error message.  
      
Backporting the fix from MySQL 5.5 to 5.1

rb:961
rb:947
2012-03-01 11:05:51 +05:30
Georgi Kodinov
637c2d9e4e merge mysql-5.1->mysql-5.1-security 2012-02-17 11:52:41 +02:00
Marko Mäkelä
4731320767 Add instrumentation for Bug#13721257 RACE CONDITION IN UPDATES OR INSERTS
OF WIDE RECORDS

row_ins_index_entry_low(), row_upd_clust_rec(): Make a redo log
checkpoint if a DEBUG flag is set. Add DEBUG_SYNC around
btr_store_big_rec_extern_fields().

rb:946 approved by Jimmy Yang
2012-02-16 12:24:11 +02:00
Georgi Kodinov
145043fd69 merged mysql-5.1->mysql-5.1-security 2012-02-06 18:24:51 +02:00
Vasil Dimov
17afdb9051 Fix Bug#11754376 45976: INNODB LOST FILES FOR TEMPORARY TABLES ON
GRACEFUL SHUTDOWN

During startup mysql picks up .frm files from the tmpdir directory and
tries to drop those tables in the storage engine.

The problem is that when tmpdir ends in / then ha_innobase::delete_table()
is passed a string like "/var/tmp//#sql123", then it wrongly normalizes it
to "/#sql123" and calls row_drop_table_for_mysql() which of course fails
to delete the table entry from the InnoDB dictionary cache.
ha_innobase::delete_table() returns an error but nevertheless mysql wipes
away the .frm file and the entry in the InnoDB dictionary cache remains
orphaned with no easy way to remove it.

The "no easy" way to remove it is to create a similar temporary table again,
copy its .frm file to tmpdir under "#sql123.frm" and restart mysqld with
tmpdir=/var/tmp (no trailing slash) - this way mysql will pick the .frm file
after restart and will try to issue drop table for "/var/tmp/#sql123"
(notice do double slash), ha_innobase::delete_table() will normalize it to
"tmp/#sql123" and row_drop_table_for_mysql() will successfully remove the
table entry from the dictionary cache.

The solution is to fix normalize_table_name_low() to normalize things like
"/var/tmp//table" correctly to "tmp/table".

This patch also adds a test function which invokes
normalize_table_name_low() with various inputs to make sure it works
correctly and a mtr test that calls this test function.

Reviewed by:	Marko (http://bur03.no.oracle.com/rb/r/929/)
2012-02-06 12:44:59 +02:00
Inaam Rana
7d696c9d24 Bug#13636122 THE ORIGINAL TABLE MISSING WHILE EXECUTE THE DDL 'ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN
rb://914
approved by: Marko Makela

Poll in fil_rename_tablespace() after setting ::stop_ios flag can
result in a hang because the other thread actually dispatching the IO
won't wake IO helper threads or flush the tablespace before starting
wait in fil_mutex_enter_and_prepare_for_io().
2012-01-31 09:31:31 -05:00
Marko Mäkelä
1f9c1f0933 btr_cur_search_to_nth_level(): Add a debug assertion
and some Valgrind instrumentation.
2012-01-25 10:15:27 +02:00
Marko Mäkelä
d985ac1f38 Bug#13496818 ASSERTION: REC_PAGE_NO > 4 IN IBUF CONTRACTION
Relax a bogus debug assertion.
Approved by Jimmy Yang on IM.
2012-01-16 14:22:03 +02:00
Annamalai Gurusami
fd6f9a1ecc Bug #11765438 58406:
ISSUES WITH COPYING PARTITIONED INNODB TABLES FROM LINUX TO WINDOWS

This problem was already fixed in mysql-trunk as part of bug #11755924.  I am 
backporting the fix to mysql-5.1.
2012-01-16 09:58:31 +05:30
Georgi Kodinov
aa03fc5333 weave merge mysql-5.1->mysql-5.1-security 2012-01-12 16:42:23 +02:00
Yasufumi Kinoshita
40203bd584 Bug#12400341 INNODB CAN LEAVE ORPHAN IBD FILES AROUND
If we meet DB_TOO_MANY_CONCURRENT_TRXS during the execution tab_create_graph from row_create_table_for_mysql(), .ibd file for the table should be created already but was not deleted for the error handling.

rb:875 approved by Jimmy Yang
2012-01-10 14:18:58 +09:00
Marko Mäkelä
a290a84403 Bug#13418934 REMOVE HAVE_PURIFY DEPENDENCES FROM INNODB
InnoDB: Remove HAVE_purify, UNIV_INIT_MEM_TO_ZERO, UNIV_SET_MEM_TO_ZERO.

The compile-time setting HAVE_purify can mask potential bugs.
It is being set in PB2 Valgrind runs. We should simply get rid of it,
and replace it with UNIV_MEM_INVALID() to declare uninitialized memory
as such in Valgrind-instrumented binaries.

os_mem_alloc_large(), ut_malloc_low(): Remove the parameter set_to_zero.

ut_malloc(): Define as a macro that invokes ut_malloc_low().

buf_pool_init(): Never initialize the buffer pool frames. All pages
must be initialized before flushing them to disk.

mem_heap_alloc(): Never initialize the allocated memory block.

os_mem_alloc_nocache(), ut_test_malloc(): Unused function, remove.

rb:813 approved by Jimmy Yang
2011-12-28 12:19:30 +02:00
Vasil Dimov
43ea968d45 Fix Bug#13510739 63775: SERVER CRASH ON HANDLER READ NEXT AFTER DELETE RECORD.
CREATE TABLE bug13510739 (c INTEGER NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (c)) ENGINE=INNODB;
INSERT INTO bug13510739 VALUES (1), (2), (3), (4);
DELETE FROM bug13510739 WHERE c=2;
HANDLER bug13510739 OPEN;
HANDLER bug13510739 READ `primary` = (2);
HANDLER bug13510739 READ `primary` NEXT;  <-- crash

The bug is that in the particular testcase row_search_for_mysql() picked up
a delete-marked record and quit, leaving the cursor non-positioned state and
on the subsequent 'get next' call the code crashed because of the
non-positioned cursor.

In row0sel.cc (line numbers from mysql-trunk):

4653         if (rec_get_deleted_flag(rec, comp)) {
...
4679                 if (index == clust_index && unique_search) {
4680 
4681                         err = DB_RECORD_NOT_FOUND;
4682                         
4683                         goto normal_return;
4684                 }       

it quit from here, not storing the cursor position.

In contrast, if the record=2 is not found at all (e.g. sleep(1) after DELETE
to let the purge wipe it away completely) then 'get = 2' does find record=3
and quits from here:

4366                 if (0 != cmp_dtuple_rec(search_tuple, rec, offsets)) {
...
4394                         btr_pcur_store_position(pcur, &mtr);
4395 
4396                         err = DB_RECORD_NOT_FOUND;
4397 #if 0
4398                         ut_print_name(stderr, trx, FALSE, index->name);
4399                         fputs(" record not found 3\n", stderr);
4400 #endif
4401 
4402                         goto normal_return;

Another fix could be to extend the condition on line 4366 to hold only if
seach_tuple matches rec AND if rec is not delete marked.

Notice that in the above test case if we wait about 1 second somewhere after
DELETE and before 'get = 2', then the testcase does not crash and returns 4
instead. Not sure if this is the correct behavior, but this bugfix removes
the crash and makes the code return what it also returns in the non-crashing
case (if rec=2 is not found during 'get = 2', e.g. we have sleep(1) there).

Approved by:	Marko (http://bur03.no.oracle.com/rb/r/863/)
2011-12-22 12:55:44 +02:00
Inaam Rana
2cdcb18bf4 Bug#11866367 FPE WHEN SETTING INNODB_SPIN_WAIT_DELAY
rb://865
approved by: Jimmy

Integer overflow causes division by zero.
2011-12-21 21:33:13 -05:00
Annamalai Gurusami
22b3830483 Bug #13117023: Innodb increments handler_read_key when it should not
The counter handler_read_key (SSV::ha_read_key_count) is incremented 
incorrectly.

The mysql server maintains a per thread system_status_var (SSV)
object.  This object contains among other things the counter
SSV::ha_read_key_count. The purpose of this counter is to measure the
number of requests to read a row based on a key (or the number of
index lookups).

This counter was wrongly incremented in the
ha_innobase::innobase_get_index(). The fix removes
this increment statement (for both innodb and innodb_plugin).

The various callers of the innobase_get_index() was checked to
determine if anybody must increment this counter (if they first call
innobase_get_index() and then perform an index lookup).  It was found
that no caller of innobase_get_index() needs to worry about the
SSV::ha_read_key_count counter.
2011-12-13 14:26:12 +05:30
Karen Langford
4de17022c2 Merge from mysql-5.1.60-release 2011-11-17 00:26:16 +01:00