This test case uses mysqlbinlog to dump the content of master-bin.000001,
but the content of master-bin.000001 is not that this test needs.
MTR runs a lot of test cases on one server, so when this test starts, the current binlog file
might not be master-bin.000001, or there are other events are written by tests before.
'RESET MASTER' command must be called at the begin, it ensures that binlog of this test
is wrote to master-bin.000001 correctly.
Three other tests have the same problem, They were fixed together.
mysqlbinlog-cp932
binlog_incident
binlog_tmp_table
Postfix.
extra/rpl_tests/rpl_row_sp006.test had changed to fix this bug.
extra/rpl_tests/rpl_row_sp006.test is also referenced by rpl_ndb_sp006,
So rpl_row_sp006.result must be changed too.
Inserting a negative value in the autoincrement column of a
partitioned innodb table was causing the value of the auto
increment counter to wrap around into a very large positive
value. The consequences are the same as if a very large positive
value was inserted into a column, e.g. reduced autoincrement
range, failure to read autoincrement counter.
The current patch ensures that before calculating the next
auto increment value, the current value is within the positive
maximum allowed limit.
Essentially, Bug#45574 results in this bug. The 'CREATE DATABASE IF NOT EXISTS' statement was not
binlogged, when the database has existed.
Sometimes, the master and slaves become inconsistent. The "CREATE DATABASE
IF NOT EXISTS mysqltest1" statement is not binlogged
if the db 'mysqltest1' existed before the test case is executed.
So the db 'mysqltest1' can't be created on slave.
Patch of Bug#45574 has resolved this problem.
But I think it is better to replace 'mysqltest1' by default db 'test'.
If an EVENT is created without the DEFINER clause set explicitly or with it set
to CURRENT_USER, the master and slaves become inconsistent. This issue stems from
the fact that in both cases, the DEFINER is set to the CURRENT_USER of the current
thread. On the master, the CURRENT_USER is the mysqld's user, while on the slave,
the CURRENT_USER is empty for the SQL Thread which is responsible for executing
the statement.
To fix the problem, we do what follows. If the definer is not set explicitly,
a DEFINER clause is added when writing the query into binlog; if 'CURRENT_USER' is
used as the DEFINER, it is replaced with the value of the current user before
writing to binlog.
Slave does not correctly handle "expected errors" leading to inconsistencies
between the mater and slave. Specifically, when a statement changes both
transactional and non-transactional tables, the transactional changes are
automatically rolled back on the master but the slave ignores the error and
does not roll them back thus leading to inconsistencies.
To fix the problem, we automatically roll back a statement that fails on
the slave but note that the transaction is not rolled back unless a "rollback"
command is in the relay log file.
binlog
Mixing transactional (T) and non-transactional (N) tables on behalf of a
transaction may lead to inconsistencies among masters and slaves in STATEMENT
mode. The problem stems from the fact that although modifications done to
non-transactional tables on behalf of a transaction become immediately visible
to other connections they do not immediately get to the binary log and therefore
consistency is broken. Although there may be issues in mixing T and M tables in
STATEMENT mode, there are safe combinations that clients find useful.
In this bug, we fix the following issue. Mixing N and T tables in multi-level
(e.g. a statement that fires a trigger) or multi-table table statements (e.g.
update t1, t2...) were not handled correctly. In such cases, it was not possible
to distinguish when a T table was updated if the sequence of changes was N and T.
In a nutshell, just the flag "modified_non_trans_table" was not enough to reflect
that both a N and T tables were changed. To circumvent this issue, we check if an
engine is registered in the handler's list and changed something which means that
a T table was modified.
Check WL 2687 for a full-fledged patch that will make the use of either the MIXED or
ROW modes completely safe.
In STATEMENT based replication, a statement that failed on the master but that
updated non-transactional tables is written to binary log with the error code
appended to it. On the slave, the statement is executed and the same error is
expected. However, when an "expected error" did not happen on the slave and was
either ignored or was related to a concurrency issue on the master, the slave
did not rollback the effects of the statement and as such inconsistencies might
happen.
To fix the problem, we automatically rollback a statement that should have
failed on a slave but succeded and whose expected failure is either ignored or
stems from a concurrency issue on the master.
All committed result differences have either been verified by me or copied from Oracle's provided
results (storage/innodb_plugin/mysql-test/*.result, storage/innodb_plugin/mysql-test/patches).
bzr branch mysql-5.1-performance-version mysql-trunk # Summit
cd mysql-trunk
bzr merge mysql-5.1-innodb_plugin # which is 5.1 + Innodb plugin
bzr rm innobase # remove the builtin
Next step: build, test fixes.
If using statement based replication (SBR), repeatedly calling
statements which are unsafe for SBR will cause a warning message
to be written to the error for each statement. This might lead
to filling up the error log and there is no way to disable this
behavior.
The solution is to only log these message (about statements unsafe
for statement based replication) if the log_warnings option is set.
For example:
SET GLOBAL LOG_WARNINGS = 0;
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(UUID());
SET GLOBAL LOG_WARNINGS = 1;
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(UUID());
In this case the message will be printed only once:
[Warning] Statement may not be safe to log in statement format.
Statement: INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(UUID())
If the log_bin_trust_function_creators option is not defined, creating a stored
function requires either one of the modifiers DETERMINISTIC, NO SQL, or READS
SQL DATA. Executing a stored function should also follows the same rules if in
STATEMENT mode. However, this was not happening and a wrong error was being
printed out: ER_BINLOG_ROW_RBR_TO_SBR.
The patch makes the creation and execution compatible and prints out the correct
error ER_BINLOG_UNSAFE_ROUTINE when a stored function without one of the modifiers
above is executed in STATEMENT mode.
to wrong result
When using MIXED mode and issuing 'CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE t_tmp',
the statement is logged if the current binlogging mode is
STATEMENT. This causes the slave to replay the instruction and
create the temporary table as well. If there is no switch to ROW
mode, and later on a 'DROP TEMPORARY TABLE t_tmp' is issued, then
this statement will also be logged and the slave will
remove/close the temporary table.
However, if there is a switch to ROW mode between the CREATE and
DROP TEMPORARY table, the DROP statement will not be logged,
leaving the slave with a dangling temporary table.
This patch addresses this, by always logging a DROP TEMPORARY
TABLE IF EXISTS when in mixed mode and a drop statement is issued
for temporary table(s).
binlog
The fix for BUG 43929 introduced a regression issue. In a nutshell, when a
statement that changes a non-transactional table fails, it is written to the
binary log with the error code appended. Unfortunately, after BUG 43929, this
failure was flushing the transactional chace causing mismatch between execution
and logging histories. To fix this issue, we avoid flushing the transactional
cache when a commit or rollback is not issued.
The "get_master_version_and_clock(...)" function in sql/slave.cc ignores
error and passes directly when queries fail, or queries succeed
but the result retrieved is empty.
The "get_master_version_and_clock(...)" function should try to reconnect master
if queries fail because of transient network problems, and fail otherwise.
The I/O thread should print a warning if the some system variables do not
exist on master (very old master)
"create as select" (innodb table)
Problem: code constructing "CREATE TABLE..." statement
doesn't take into account that current database is not set
in some cases. That may lead to a server crash.
Fix: check if current database is set.
There is an inconsistency with DROP DATABASE|TABLE|EVENT IF EXISTS and
CREATE DATABASE|TABLE|EVENT IF NOT EXISTS. DROP IF EXISTS statements are
binlogged even if either the DB, TABLE or EVENT does not exist. In
contrast, Only the CREATE EVENT IF NOT EXISTS is binlogged when the EVENT
exists.
This patch fixes the following cases for all the replication formats:
CREATE DATABASE IF NOT EXISTS.
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS,
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS ... LIKE,
CREAET TABLE IF NOT EXISTS ... SELECT.
the auto_increment value
This is an alternative patch that instead of allowing RECREATE TABLE
on TRUNCATE TABLE it implements reset_auto_increment that is called
after delete_all_rows.
Note: this bug was fixed by Mattias Jonsson:
Pusing this patch: http://lists.mysql.com/commits/70370
With ibmdb2i_create_index_option set to 1, creating an IBMDB2I table
with a primary key should produce an additional index that uses EBCDIC
hexadecimal sorting. However, this does not work. Adding indexes that
are not primary keys does work. The ibmdb2i_create_index_option should
be honoured when creating a table with a primary key.
This patch adds code to the create() function to check for the value
of the ibmdb2i_create_index_option variable and, when appropriate, to
generate a *HEX-based shadow index in DB2 for the primary key. Previously
this behavior was limited to secondary indexes.
Additionally, this patch restricts the creation of shadow indexes to
cases in which a non-*HEX sort sequence is used, as the documentation
for ibmdb2i_create_index_option describes. Previously, the shadow index
would in some cases be created even when the MySQL-specific index used
*HEX sorting, leading to redundant indexes.
Finally, the code used to generate the list of fields for indexes
and the code used to generate the SQL statement for the shadow
indexes has been refactored into individual functions.
