Updated tests: cases with bugs or which cannot be run
with the cursor-protocol were excluded with
"--disable_cursor_protocol"/"--enable_cursor_protocol"
Fix for v.10.5
The problem was that we did not handle errors properly in
JOIN::get_best_combination. In case an early error, JOIN->join_tab would
contain unintialized values, which would cause errors on cleanup().
The error in question was reported earlier, but not noticed until later.
One cause of this is that most of the sql_select.cc code just checks
thd->fatal_error and not thd->is_error().
Fixed by changing of checks of fatal_error to is_error().
This patch adds for "--ps-protocol" second execution
of queries "SELECT".
Also in this patch it is added ability to disable/enable
(--disable_ps2_protocol/--enable_ps2_protocol) second
execution for "--ps-prototocol" in testcases.
Some tests drop the default mtr database "test". This may fail due
to the directory not being empty. InnoDB may not delete all tables
immediately, due to the "background drop table queue" or its
replacement in commit 1bd681c8b3
(the purge of history would clean up after a DDL operation during
which the server was killed).
Let us try to avoid "drop database test" whenever it is easily possible.
Where it is not, SET GLOBAL innodb_max_purge_lag_wait=0 will ensure
that the replacement of the "background drop table queue" will have
completed its job.
The problem is that if table definition cache (TDC) is full of real tables
which are in tables cache, view definition can not stay there so will be
removed by its own underlying tables.
In situation above old mechanism of detection matching definition in PS
and current version always require reprepare and so prevent executing
the PS.
One work around is to increase TDC, other - improve version check for
views/triggers (which is done here). Now in suspicious cases we check:
- timestamp (microseconds) of the view to be sure that version really
have changed;
- time (microseconds) of creation of a trigger related to time
(microseconds) of statement preparation.
1. For INSERT..SELECT statements: don't include table/view the data
is inserted into in the list of leaf tables
2. Remove duplicated and dead code related to table_count
This bug caused crashes when the server executed such a CREATE VIEW
statement whose view specification contained a reference to an unknown
column in a subquery used in ON condition.
The cause of this bug is quite similar to the cause of the bug MDEV-26412.
The fix of this bug is quite similar to the fix for MDEV-26412.
Approved by Sergey Petrunia <sergey@mariadb.com>
This bug could affect prepared statements for the command CREATE VIEW with
specification that contained unnamed basic constant in select list. If
generation of a valid name for the corresponding view column required
resolution of conflicts with names of other columns that were explicitly
defined then execution of such prepared statement and following deallocation
of this statement led to reading from freed memory.
Approved by Oleksandr Byelkin <sanja@mariadb.com>
Also increase user name up to 128.
The work was started by Rucha Deodhar <rucha.deodhar@mariadb.com>,
contains audit plugin fixes by Alexey Botchkov <holyfoot@askmonty.org>.
Adds an implementation for SELECT ... FOR UPDATE SKIP LOCKED /
SELECT ... LOCK IN SHARED MODE SKIP LOCKED
This is implemented only InnoDB at the moment, not in RockDB yet.
This adds a new hander flag HA_CAN_SKIP_LOCKED than
will be used when the storage engine advertises the flag.
When a storage engine indicates this flag it will get
TL_WRITE_SKIP_LOCKED and TL_READ_SKIP_LOCKED transaction types.
The Lex structure has been updated to store both the FOR UPDATE/LOCK IN
SHARE as well as the SKIP LOCKED so the SHOW CREATE VIEW
implementation is simplier.
"SELECT FOR UPDATE ... SKIP LOCKED" combined with CREATE TABLE AS or
INSERT.. SELECT on the result set is not safe for STATEMENT based
replication. MIXED replication will replicate this as row based events."
Thanks to guidance from Facebook commit
193896c466
This helped verify basic test case, and components that need implementing
(even though every part was implemented differently).
Thanks Marko for guidance on simplier InnoDB implementation.
Reviewers: Marko, Monty
