mirror/mariadb
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/MariaDB/server.git synced 2025-01-29 10:14:19 +01:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

For performance reasons we remove the ability in unique indexes on autoincrements to remove the ability to insert key lower then the current autoincrement value.

Browse source 
mysql-test/r/archive.result:
  Modified error output
mysql-test/t/archive.test:
  Fix for the change in behavior
storage/archive/ha_archive.cc:
  ifdef of the search record code
This commit is contained in:
unknown 2007-01-26 14:17:45 -08:00
parent f69cfbf857
commit c95bc8dcdb
3 changed files with 7 additions and 6 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
mysql-test/r/archive.result
View file

@ -12367,6 +12367,7 @@ INSERT INTO t5 VALUES (NULL, "foo");
INSERT INTO t5 VALUES (NULL, "foo");
INSERT INTO t5 VALUES (32, "foo");
INSERT INTO t5 VALUES (23, "foo");
ERROR 23000: Can't write; duplicate key in table 't5'
INSERT INTO t5 VALUES (NULL, "foo");
INSERT INTO t5 VALUES (NULL, "foo");
INSERT INTO t5 VALUES (3, "foo");
@ -12380,7 +12381,6 @@ a b
4 foo
5 foo
32 foo
23 foo
33 foo
34 foo
35 foo

1
mysql-test/t/archive.test
View file

@ -1379,6 +1379,7 @@ INSERT INTO t5 VALUES (NULL, "foo");
INSERT INTO t5 VALUES (NULL, "foo");
INSERT INTO t5 VALUES (NULL, "foo");
INSERT INTO t5 VALUES (32, "foo");
--error 1022
INSERT INTO t5 VALUES (23, "foo");
INSERT INTO t5 VALUES (NULL, "foo");
INSERT INTO t5 VALUES (NULL, "foo");

10
storage/archive/ha_archive.cc
View file

@ -784,23 +784,22 @@ int ha_archive::write_row(byte *buf)
temp_auto= table->next_number_field->val_int();
/*
Simple optimization to see if we fail for duplicate key immediatly
because we have just given out this value.
We don't support decremening auto_increment. They make the performance
just cry.
*/
if (temp_auto == share->archive_write.auto_increment &&
if (temp_auto <= share->archive_write.auto_increment &&
mkey->flags & HA_NOSAME)
{
rc= HA_ERR_FOUND_DUPP_KEY;
goto error;
}
#ifdef DEAD_CODE
/*
Bad news, this will cause a search for the unique value which is very
expensive since we will have to do a table scan which will lock up
all other writers during this period. This could perhaps be optimized
in the future.
*/
if (temp_auto < share->archive_write.auto_increment &&
mkey->flags & HA_NOSAME)
{
/*
First we create a buffer that we can use for reading rows, and can pass
@ -838,6 +837,7 @@ int ha_archive::write_row(byte *buf)
}
}
}
#endif
else
{
if (temp_auto > share->archive_write.auto_increment)