mariadb/sql/mdl.cc

2915 lines
86 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

2011-06-30 17:46:53 +02:00
/* Copyright (c) 2007, 2011, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
the Free Software Foundation; version 2 of the License.
This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
GNU General Public License for more details.
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
2011-06-30 17:46:53 +02:00
Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA */
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
#include "mdl.h"
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
#include "debug_sync.h"
#include <hash.h>
#include <mysqld_error.h>
#include <mysql/plugin.h>
#include <mysql/service_thd_wait.h>
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
#ifdef HAVE_PSI_INTERFACE
static PSI_mutex_key key_MDL_map_mutex;
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
static PSI_mutex_key key_MDL_wait_LOCK_wait_status;
static PSI_mutex_info all_mdl_mutexes[]=
{
{ &key_MDL_map_mutex, "MDL_map::mutex", PSI_FLAG_GLOBAL},
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
{ &key_MDL_wait_LOCK_wait_status, "MDL_wait::LOCK_wait_status", 0}
};
static PSI_rwlock_key key_MDL_lock_rwlock;
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
static PSI_rwlock_key key_MDL_context_LOCK_waiting_for;
static PSI_rwlock_info all_mdl_rwlocks[]=
{
{ &key_MDL_lock_rwlock, "MDL_lock::rwlock", 0},
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
{ &key_MDL_context_LOCK_waiting_for, "MDL_context::LOCK_waiting_for", 0}
};
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
static PSI_cond_key key_MDL_wait_COND_wait_status;
static PSI_cond_info all_mdl_conds[]=
{
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
{ &key_MDL_wait_COND_wait_status, "MDL_context::COND_wait_status", 0}
};
/**
Initialise all the performance schema instrumentation points
used by the MDL subsystem.
*/
static void init_mdl_psi_keys(void)
{
const char *category= "sql";
int count;
if (PSI_server == NULL)
return;
count= array_elements(all_mdl_mutexes);
PSI_server->register_mutex(category, all_mdl_mutexes, count);
count= array_elements(all_mdl_rwlocks);
PSI_server->register_rwlock(category, all_mdl_rwlocks, count);
count= array_elements(all_mdl_conds);
PSI_server->register_cond(category, all_mdl_conds, count);
}
#endif /* HAVE_PSI_INTERFACE */
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
/**
Thread state names to be used in case when we have to wait on resource
belonging to certain namespace.
*/
const char *MDL_key::m_namespace_to_wait_state_name[NAMESPACE_END]=
{
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
"Waiting for global read lock",
"Waiting for schema metadata lock",
"Waiting for table metadata lock",
"Waiting for stored function metadata lock",
"Waiting for stored procedure metadata lock",
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
"Waiting for trigger metadata lock",
"Waiting for event metadata lock",
"Waiting for commit lock"
};
static bool mdl_initialized= 0;
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
class MDL_object_lock;
class MDL_object_lock_cache_adapter;
/**
A collection of all MDL locks. A singleton,
there is only one instance of the map in the server.
Maps MDL_key to MDL_lock instances.
*/
class MDL_map
{
public:
void init();
void destroy();
MDL_lock *find_or_insert(const MDL_key *key);
void remove(MDL_lock *lock);
private:
bool move_from_hash_to_lock_mutex(MDL_lock *lock);
private:
/** All acquired locks in the server. */
HASH m_locks;
/* Protects access to m_locks hash. */
mysql_mutex_t m_mutex;
/**
Cache of (unused) MDL_lock objects available for re-use.
On some systems (e.g. Windows XP) constructing/destructing
MDL_lock objects can be fairly expensive. We use this cache
to avoid these costs in scenarios in which they can have
significant negative effect on performance. For example, when
there is only one thread constantly executing statements in
auto-commit mode and thus constantly causing creation/
destruction of MDL_lock objects for the tables it uses.
Note that this cache contains only MDL_object_lock objects.
Protected by m_mutex mutex.
*/
typedef I_P_List<MDL_object_lock, MDL_object_lock_cache_adapter,
I_P_List_counter>
Lock_cache;
Lock_cache m_unused_locks_cache;
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
/** Pre-allocated MDL_lock object for GLOBAL namespace. */
MDL_lock *m_global_lock;
/** Pre-allocated MDL_lock object for COMMIT namespace. */
MDL_lock *m_commit_lock;
};
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
/**
A context of the recursive traversal through all contexts
in all sessions in search for deadlock.
*/
class Deadlock_detection_visitor: public MDL_wait_for_graph_visitor
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
{
public:
Deadlock_detection_visitor(MDL_context *start_node_arg)
: m_start_node(start_node_arg),
m_victim(NULL),
m_current_search_depth(0),
m_found_deadlock(FALSE)
{}
virtual bool enter_node(MDL_context *node);
virtual void leave_node(MDL_context *node);
virtual bool inspect_edge(MDL_context *dest);
MDL_context *get_victim() const { return m_victim; }
private:
/**
Change the deadlock victim to a new one if it has lower deadlock
weight.
*/
void opt_change_victim_to(MDL_context *new_victim);
private:
/**
The context which has initiated the search. There
can be multiple searches happening in parallel at the same time.
*/
MDL_context *m_start_node;
/** If a deadlock is found, the context that identifies the victim. */
MDL_context *m_victim;
/** Set to the 0 at start. Increased whenever
we descend into another MDL context (aka traverse to the next
wait-for graph node). When MAX_SEARCH_DEPTH is reached, we
assume that a deadlock is found, even if we have not found a
loop.
*/
uint m_current_search_depth;
/** TRUE if we found a deadlock. */
bool m_found_deadlock;
Fix for bug #51093 "Crash (possibly stack overflow) in MDL_lock::find_deadlock". On some platforms deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem under certain conditions might have exhausted stack space causing server crashes. Particularly this caused failures of rqg_mdl_stability test on Solaris in PushBuild. During search for deadlock MDL deadlock detector could sometimes encounter loop in the waiters graph in which MDL_context which has started search for a deadlock does not participate. In such case our algorithm will continue looping assuming that either this deadlock will be resolved by MDL_context which has created it (i.e. by one of loop participants) or maximum search depth will be reached. Since max search depth was set to 1000 in the latter case on platforms where each iteration of deadlock search algorithm needs more than DEFAULT_STACK_SIZE/1000 bytes of stack (around 192 bytes for 32-bit and around 256 bytes for 64-bit platforms) we might have exhausted stack space. This patch solves this problem by reducing maximum search depth for MDL deadlock detector to 32. This should be safe at the moment as it is unlikely that each iteration of the current deadlock detector algorithm will consume more than 1K of stack (thus total amount of stack required can't be more than 32K) and we require at least 80K of stack in order to open any table. Also this value should be (hopefully) big enough to not cause too much false deadlock errors (there is an anecdotal evidence that real-life deadlocks are typically shorter than that). Additional reasearch should be conducted in future in order to determine the more optimal value of maximum search depth. This patch does not include test case as existing rqg_mdl_stability test can serve as one.
2010-02-15 15:37:48 +03:00
/**
Maximum depth for deadlock searches. After this depth is
achieved we will unconditionally declare that there is a
deadlock.
@note This depth should be small enough to avoid stack
being exhausted by recursive search algorithm.
TODO: Find out what is the optimal value for this parameter.
Current value is safe, but probably sub-optimal,
as there is an anecdotal evidence that real-life
deadlocks are even shorter typically.
*/
static const uint MAX_SEARCH_DEPTH= 32;
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
};
/**
Enter a node of a wait-for graph. After
a node is entered, inspect_edge() will be called
for all wait-for destinations of this node. Then
leave_node() will be called.
We call "enter_node()" for all nodes we inspect,
including the starting node.
@retval TRUE Maximum search depth exceeded.
@retval FALSE OK.
*/
bool Deadlock_detection_visitor::enter_node(MDL_context *node)
{
m_found_deadlock= ++m_current_search_depth >= MAX_SEARCH_DEPTH;
if (m_found_deadlock)
{
DBUG_ASSERT(! m_victim);
opt_change_victim_to(node);
}
return m_found_deadlock;
}
/**
Done inspecting this node. Decrease the search
depth. If a deadlock is found, and we are
backtracking to the start node, optionally
change the deadlock victim to one with lower
deadlock weight.
*/
void Deadlock_detection_visitor::leave_node(MDL_context *node)
{
--m_current_search_depth;
if (m_found_deadlock)
opt_change_victim_to(node);
}
/**
Inspect a wait-for graph edge from one MDL context to another.
@retval TRUE A loop is found.
@retval FALSE No loop is found.
*/
bool Deadlock_detection_visitor::inspect_edge(MDL_context *node)
{
m_found_deadlock= node == m_start_node;
return m_found_deadlock;
}
/**
Change the deadlock victim to a new one if it has lower deadlock
weight.
@retval new_victim Victim is not changed.
@retval !new_victim New victim became the current.
*/
void
Deadlock_detection_visitor::opt_change_victim_to(MDL_context *new_victim)
{
if (m_victim == NULL ||
m_victim->get_deadlock_weight() >= new_victim->get_deadlock_weight())
{
/* Swap victims, unlock the old one. */
MDL_context *tmp= m_victim;
m_victim= new_victim;
m_victim->lock_deadlock_victim();
if (tmp)
tmp->unlock_deadlock_victim();
}
}
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
/**
Get a bit corresponding to enum_mdl_type value in a granted/waiting bitmaps
and compatibility matrices.
*/
#define MDL_BIT(A) static_cast<MDL_lock::bitmap_t>(1U << A)
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
/**
The lock context. Created internally for an acquired lock.
For a given name, there exists only one MDL_lock instance,
and it exists only when the lock has been granted.
Can be seen as an MDL subsystem's version of TABLE_SHARE.
This is an abstract class which lacks information about
compatibility rules for lock types. They should be specified
in its descendants.
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
*/
class MDL_lock
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
{
public:
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
typedef uchar bitmap_t;
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
class Ticket_list
{
public:
typedef I_P_List<MDL_ticket,
I_P_List_adapter<MDL_ticket,
&MDL_ticket::next_in_lock,
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
&MDL_ticket::prev_in_lock>,
I_P_List_null_counter,
I_P_List_fast_push_back<MDL_ticket> >
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
List;
operator const List &() const { return m_list; }
Ticket_list() :m_bitmap(0) {}
void add_ticket(MDL_ticket *ticket);
void remove_ticket(MDL_ticket *ticket);
bool is_empty() const { return m_list.is_empty(); }
bitmap_t bitmap() const { return m_bitmap; }
private:
void clear_bit_if_not_in_list(enum_mdl_type type);
private:
/** List of tickets. */
List m_list;
/** Bitmap of types of tickets in this list. */
bitmap_t m_bitmap;
};
typedef Ticket_list::List::Iterator Ticket_iterator;
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
public:
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
/** The key of the object (data) being protected. */
MDL_key key;
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
/**
Read-write lock protecting this lock context.
@note The fact that we use read-write lock prefers readers here is
important as deadlock detector won't work correctly otherwise.
For example, imagine that we have following waiters graph:
ctxA -> obj1 -> ctxB -> obj1 -|
^ |
|----------------------------|
and both ctxA and ctxB start deadlock detection process:
ctxA read-locks obj1 ctxB read-locks obj2
ctxA goes deeper ctxB goes deeper
Now ctxC comes in who wants to start waiting on obj1, also
ctxD comes in who wants to start waiting on obj2.
ctxC tries to write-lock obj1 ctxD tries to write-lock obj2
ctxC is blocked ctxD is blocked
Now ctxA and ctxB resume their search:
ctxA tries to read-lock obj2 ctxB tries to read-lock obj1
If m_rwlock prefers writes (or fair) both ctxA and ctxB would be
blocked because of pending write locks from ctxD and ctxC
correspondingly. Thus we will get a deadlock in deadlock detector.
If m_wrlock prefers readers (actually ignoring pending writers is
enough) ctxA and ctxB will continue and no deadlock will occur.
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
*/
mysql_prlock_t m_rwlock;
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
bool is_empty() const
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
{
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
return (m_granted.is_empty() && m_waiting.is_empty());
}
virtual const bitmap_t *incompatible_granted_types_bitmap() const = 0;
virtual const bitmap_t *incompatible_waiting_types_bitmap() const = 0;
bool has_pending_conflicting_lock(enum_mdl_type type);
Bug#13058122 - DML, LOCK/UNLOCK TABLES AND SELECT LEAD TO FOREVER MDL LOCK Analysis: ---------- While granting MDL lock for the lock requests in wait queue, first the lock is granted to the high priority lock types and then to the low priority lock types. MDL Priority Matrix, +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+ | Locks | | | | | | | | has Priority| | | | | | | | over ---> | S | SR| SW| SU| SNW| SNRW| +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+ | X | + | + | + | + | + | + | +-------------|----|---|---|---|----|-----| | SNRW | - | + | + | - | - | - | +-------------|----|---|---|---|----|-----| | SNW | - | - | + | - | - | - | +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+ Here '+' means, Lock priority is higher. '-' means, Has same priority In the scenario where, *. Lock wait queue has requests of type S/SR/SW/SU. *. And locks of high priority X/SNRW/SNW are requested continuously. In this case, while granting lock, always first high priority lock requests(X/SNRW/SNW) are considered. Low priority locks(S/SR/SW/SU) will not get chance and they will wait forever. In the scenario for which this bug is reported, application executed many LOCK TABLES ... WRITE statements concurrently. These statements request SNRW lock. Also there were some connections trying to execute DML statements requesting SR lock. Since SNRW lock request has higher priority (and as they were too many waiting SNRW requests) lock is always granted to it. So, lock request SR will wait forever, resulting in DML starvation. How is this handled in 5.1? --------------------------- Even in 5.1 we have low priority lock starvation issue. But, in 5.1 thread locking, system variable "max_write_lock_count" can be configured to grant some pending read lock requests. After "max_write_lock_count" of write lock grants all the low priority locks are granted. Why this issue is seen in 5.5/trunk? --------------------------------- In 5.5/trunk MDL locking, "max_write_lock_count" system variable exists but not used in MDL, only thread lock uses it. So no effect of "max_write_lock_count" in MDL locking. This means that starvation of metadata locks is possible even if max_write_lock_count is used. Looks like, customer was using "max_write_lock_count" in 5.1 and when upgraded to 5.5, starvation is seen because of not having effect of "max_write_lock_count" in MDL. Fix: ---------- As a fix, support for max_write_lock_count is added to MDL. To maintain write lock counter per MDL_lock object, new member "m_hog_lock_count" is added in MDL_lock. And following logic is added to increment the counter in function reschedule_waiters, (reschedule_waiters function is called while thread is releasing the lock) - After granting lock request from the wait queue. - Check if there are any S/SR/SU/SW exists in the wait queue - If yes then increment the "m_hog_lock_count" And following logic is added in the same function to handle pending S/SU/SR/SW locks - Before granting locks - Check if max_write_lock_count <= m_hog_lock_count - If Yes, then try to grant S/SR/SW/SU locks. (Since all of these has same priority, all locks are granted together. But some lock grant may fail because of grant incompatibility) - Reset m_hog_lock_count if there no low priority lock requests in wait queue. - return Note: -------------------------- In the lock priority matrix explained above, though X has priority over the SNW and SNRW. X locks is taken mostly for RENAME, TRUNCATE, CREATE ... operations. So lock type X may not be requested in loop continuously in real world applications, as compared to other lock request types. So, lock request of type SNW and SNRW are not starved. So, we can grant all S/SR/SU/SW in one shot, without considering SNW & SNRW lock request starvation. ALTER table operations take SU lock first and then upgrade to SNW if required. All S, SR, SW, SU have same lock priority. So while granting SU, request of types SR, SW, S are also granted in one shot. So, lock request of type SU->SNW in loop will not make other low priority lock request to starve. But, when there is request for lock of type SNRW, lock requests of lower priority types are not granted. And if SNRW is requested in loop continuously then all S, SR, SW, SU are starved. This patch addresses the latter scenario. When we have S/SR/SW/SU in wait queue and if there are - Continuous SNRW lock requests - OR one or more X and Continuous SNRW lock requests. - OR one SNW and Continuous SNRW lock requests. - OR one SNW, one or more X and continuous SNRW lock requests. in wait queue then, S/SR/SW/SU lock request are starved.
2012-08-07 11:48:36 +05:30
bool can_grant_lock(enum_mdl_type type, MDL_context *requstor_ctx,
bool ignore_lock_priority) const;
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
inline static MDL_lock *create(const MDL_key *key);
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
void reschedule_waiters();
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
void remove_ticket(Ticket_list MDL_lock::*queue, MDL_ticket *ticket);
bool visit_subgraph(MDL_ticket *waiting_ticket,
MDL_wait_for_graph_visitor *gvisitor);
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
virtual bool needs_notification(const MDL_ticket *ticket) const = 0;
virtual void notify_conflicting_locks(MDL_context *ctx) = 0;
Bug#13058122 - DML, LOCK/UNLOCK TABLES AND SELECT LEAD TO FOREVER MDL LOCK Analysis: ---------- While granting MDL lock for the lock requests in wait queue, first the lock is granted to the high priority lock types and then to the low priority lock types. MDL Priority Matrix, +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+ | Locks | | | | | | | | has Priority| | | | | | | | over ---> | S | SR| SW| SU| SNW| SNRW| +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+ | X | + | + | + | + | + | + | +-------------|----|---|---|---|----|-----| | SNRW | - | + | + | - | - | - | +-------------|----|---|---|---|----|-----| | SNW | - | - | + | - | - | - | +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+ Here '+' means, Lock priority is higher. '-' means, Has same priority In the scenario where, *. Lock wait queue has requests of type S/SR/SW/SU. *. And locks of high priority X/SNRW/SNW are requested continuously. In this case, while granting lock, always first high priority lock requests(X/SNRW/SNW) are considered. Low priority locks(S/SR/SW/SU) will not get chance and they will wait forever. In the scenario for which this bug is reported, application executed many LOCK TABLES ... WRITE statements concurrently. These statements request SNRW lock. Also there were some connections trying to execute DML statements requesting SR lock. Since SNRW lock request has higher priority (and as they were too many waiting SNRW requests) lock is always granted to it. So, lock request SR will wait forever, resulting in DML starvation. How is this handled in 5.1? --------------------------- Even in 5.1 we have low priority lock starvation issue. But, in 5.1 thread locking, system variable "max_write_lock_count" can be configured to grant some pending read lock requests. After "max_write_lock_count" of write lock grants all the low priority locks are granted. Why this issue is seen in 5.5/trunk? --------------------------------- In 5.5/trunk MDL locking, "max_write_lock_count" system variable exists but not used in MDL, only thread lock uses it. So no effect of "max_write_lock_count" in MDL locking. This means that starvation of metadata locks is possible even if max_write_lock_count is used. Looks like, customer was using "max_write_lock_count" in 5.1 and when upgraded to 5.5, starvation is seen because of not having effect of "max_write_lock_count" in MDL. Fix: ---------- As a fix, support for max_write_lock_count is added to MDL. To maintain write lock counter per MDL_lock object, new member "m_hog_lock_count" is added in MDL_lock. And following logic is added to increment the counter in function reschedule_waiters, (reschedule_waiters function is called while thread is releasing the lock) - After granting lock request from the wait queue. - Check if there are any S/SR/SU/SW exists in the wait queue - If yes then increment the "m_hog_lock_count" And following logic is added in the same function to handle pending S/SU/SR/SW locks - Before granting locks - Check if max_write_lock_count <= m_hog_lock_count - If Yes, then try to grant S/SR/SW/SU locks. (Since all of these has same priority, all locks are granted together. But some lock grant may fail because of grant incompatibility) - Reset m_hog_lock_count if there no low priority lock requests in wait queue. - return Note: -------------------------- In the lock priority matrix explained above, though X has priority over the SNW and SNRW. X locks is taken mostly for RENAME, TRUNCATE, CREATE ... operations. So lock type X may not be requested in loop continuously in real world applications, as compared to other lock request types. So, lock request of type SNW and SNRW are not starved. So, we can grant all S/SR/SU/SW in one shot, without considering SNW & SNRW lock request starvation. ALTER table operations take SU lock first and then upgrade to SNW if required. All S, SR, SW, SU have same lock priority. So while granting SU, request of types SR, SW, S are also granted in one shot. So, lock request of type SU->SNW in loop will not make other low priority lock request to starve. But, when there is request for lock of type SNRW, lock requests of lower priority types are not granted. And if SNRW is requested in loop continuously then all S, SR, SW, SU are starved. This patch addresses the latter scenario. When we have S/SR/SW/SU in wait queue and if there are - Continuous SNRW lock requests - OR one or more X and Continuous SNRW lock requests. - OR one SNW and Continuous SNRW lock requests. - OR one SNW, one or more X and continuous SNRW lock requests. in wait queue then, S/SR/SW/SU lock request are starved.
2012-08-07 11:48:36 +05:30
virtual bitmap_t hog_lock_types_bitmap() const = 0;
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
/** List of granted tickets for this lock. */
Ticket_list m_granted;
/** Tickets for contexts waiting to acquire a lock. */
Ticket_list m_waiting;
Bug#13058122 - DML, LOCK/UNLOCK TABLES AND SELECT LEAD TO FOREVER MDL LOCK Analysis: ---------- While granting MDL lock for the lock requests in wait queue, first the lock is granted to the high priority lock types and then to the low priority lock types. MDL Priority Matrix, +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+ | Locks | | | | | | | | has Priority| | | | | | | | over ---> | S | SR| SW| SU| SNW| SNRW| +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+ | X | + | + | + | + | + | + | +-------------|----|---|---|---|----|-----| | SNRW | - | + | + | - | - | - | +-------------|----|---|---|---|----|-----| | SNW | - | - | + | - | - | - | +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+ Here '+' means, Lock priority is higher. '-' means, Has same priority In the scenario where, *. Lock wait queue has requests of type S/SR/SW/SU. *. And locks of high priority X/SNRW/SNW are requested continuously. In this case, while granting lock, always first high priority lock requests(X/SNRW/SNW) are considered. Low priority locks(S/SR/SW/SU) will not get chance and they will wait forever. In the scenario for which this bug is reported, application executed many LOCK TABLES ... WRITE statements concurrently. These statements request SNRW lock. Also there were some connections trying to execute DML statements requesting SR lock. Since SNRW lock request has higher priority (and as they were too many waiting SNRW requests) lock is always granted to it. So, lock request SR will wait forever, resulting in DML starvation. How is this handled in 5.1? --------------------------- Even in 5.1 we have low priority lock starvation issue. But, in 5.1 thread locking, system variable "max_write_lock_count" can be configured to grant some pending read lock requests. After "max_write_lock_count" of write lock grants all the low priority locks are granted. Why this issue is seen in 5.5/trunk? --------------------------------- In 5.5/trunk MDL locking, "max_write_lock_count" system variable exists but not used in MDL, only thread lock uses it. So no effect of "max_write_lock_count" in MDL locking. This means that starvation of metadata locks is possible even if max_write_lock_count is used. Looks like, customer was using "max_write_lock_count" in 5.1 and when upgraded to 5.5, starvation is seen because of not having effect of "max_write_lock_count" in MDL. Fix: ---------- As a fix, support for max_write_lock_count is added to MDL. To maintain write lock counter per MDL_lock object, new member "m_hog_lock_count" is added in MDL_lock. And following logic is added to increment the counter in function reschedule_waiters, (reschedule_waiters function is called while thread is releasing the lock) - After granting lock request from the wait queue. - Check if there are any S/SR/SU/SW exists in the wait queue - If yes then increment the "m_hog_lock_count" And following logic is added in the same function to handle pending S/SU/SR/SW locks - Before granting locks - Check if max_write_lock_count <= m_hog_lock_count - If Yes, then try to grant S/SR/SW/SU locks. (Since all of these has same priority, all locks are granted together. But some lock grant may fail because of grant incompatibility) - Reset m_hog_lock_count if there no low priority lock requests in wait queue. - return Note: -------------------------- In the lock priority matrix explained above, though X has priority over the SNW and SNRW. X locks is taken mostly for RENAME, TRUNCATE, CREATE ... operations. So lock type X may not be requested in loop continuously in real world applications, as compared to other lock request types. So, lock request of type SNW and SNRW are not starved. So, we can grant all S/SR/SU/SW in one shot, without considering SNW & SNRW lock request starvation. ALTER table operations take SU lock first and then upgrade to SNW if required. All S, SR, SW, SU have same lock priority. So while granting SU, request of types SR, SW, S are also granted in one shot. So, lock request of type SU->SNW in loop will not make other low priority lock request to starve. But, when there is request for lock of type SNRW, lock requests of lower priority types are not granted. And if SNRW is requested in loop continuously then all S, SR, SW, SU are starved. This patch addresses the latter scenario. When we have S/SR/SW/SU in wait queue and if there are - Continuous SNRW lock requests - OR one or more X and Continuous SNRW lock requests. - OR one SNW and Continuous SNRW lock requests. - OR one SNW, one or more X and continuous SNRW lock requests. in wait queue then, S/SR/SW/SU lock request are starved.
2012-08-07 11:48:36 +05:30
/**
Number of times high priority lock requests have been granted while
low priority lock requests were waiting.
*/
ulong m_hog_lock_count;
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
public:
MDL_lock(const MDL_key *key_arg)
: key(key_arg),
Bug#13058122 - DML, LOCK/UNLOCK TABLES AND SELECT LEAD TO FOREVER MDL LOCK Analysis: ---------- While granting MDL lock for the lock requests in wait queue, first the lock is granted to the high priority lock types and then to the low priority lock types. MDL Priority Matrix, +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+ | Locks | | | | | | | | has Priority| | | | | | | | over ---> | S | SR| SW| SU| SNW| SNRW| +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+ | X | + | + | + | + | + | + | +-------------|----|---|---|---|----|-----| | SNRW | - | + | + | - | - | - | +-------------|----|---|---|---|----|-----| | SNW | - | - | + | - | - | - | +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+ Here '+' means, Lock priority is higher. '-' means, Has same priority In the scenario where, *. Lock wait queue has requests of type S/SR/SW/SU. *. And locks of high priority X/SNRW/SNW are requested continuously. In this case, while granting lock, always first high priority lock requests(X/SNRW/SNW) are considered. Low priority locks(S/SR/SW/SU) will not get chance and they will wait forever. In the scenario for which this bug is reported, application executed many LOCK TABLES ... WRITE statements concurrently. These statements request SNRW lock. Also there were some connections trying to execute DML statements requesting SR lock. Since SNRW lock request has higher priority (and as they were too many waiting SNRW requests) lock is always granted to it. So, lock request SR will wait forever, resulting in DML starvation. How is this handled in 5.1? --------------------------- Even in 5.1 we have low priority lock starvation issue. But, in 5.1 thread locking, system variable "max_write_lock_count" can be configured to grant some pending read lock requests. After "max_write_lock_count" of write lock grants all the low priority locks are granted. Why this issue is seen in 5.5/trunk? --------------------------------- In 5.5/trunk MDL locking, "max_write_lock_count" system variable exists but not used in MDL, only thread lock uses it. So no effect of "max_write_lock_count" in MDL locking. This means that starvation of metadata locks is possible even if max_write_lock_count is used. Looks like, customer was using "max_write_lock_count" in 5.1 and when upgraded to 5.5, starvation is seen because of not having effect of "max_write_lock_count" in MDL. Fix: ---------- As a fix, support for max_write_lock_count is added to MDL. To maintain write lock counter per MDL_lock object, new member "m_hog_lock_count" is added in MDL_lock. And following logic is added to increment the counter in function reschedule_waiters, (reschedule_waiters function is called while thread is releasing the lock) - After granting lock request from the wait queue. - Check if there are any S/SR/SU/SW exists in the wait queue - If yes then increment the "m_hog_lock_count" And following logic is added in the same function to handle pending S/SU/SR/SW locks - Before granting locks - Check if max_write_lock_count <= m_hog_lock_count - If Yes, then try to grant S/SR/SW/SU locks. (Since all of these has same priority, all locks are granted together. But some lock grant may fail because of grant incompatibility) - Reset m_hog_lock_count if there no low priority lock requests in wait queue. - return Note: -------------------------- In the lock priority matrix explained above, though X has priority over the SNW and SNRW. X locks is taken mostly for RENAME, TRUNCATE, CREATE ... operations. So lock type X may not be requested in loop continuously in real world applications, as compared to other lock request types. So, lock request of type SNW and SNRW are not starved. So, we can grant all S/SR/SU/SW in one shot, without considering SNW & SNRW lock request starvation. ALTER table operations take SU lock first and then upgrade to SNW if required. All S, SR, SW, SU have same lock priority. So while granting SU, request of types SR, SW, S are also granted in one shot. So, lock request of type SU->SNW in loop will not make other low priority lock request to starve. But, when there is request for lock of type SNRW, lock requests of lower priority types are not granted. And if SNRW is requested in loop continuously then all S, SR, SW, SU are starved. This patch addresses the latter scenario. When we have S/SR/SW/SU in wait queue and if there are - Continuous SNRW lock requests - OR one or more X and Continuous SNRW lock requests. - OR one SNW and Continuous SNRW lock requests. - OR one SNW, one or more X and continuous SNRW lock requests. in wait queue then, S/SR/SW/SU lock request are starved.
2012-08-07 11:48:36 +05:30
m_hog_lock_count(0),
m_ref_usage(0),
m_ref_release(0),
m_is_destroyed(FALSE),
m_version(0)
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
{
mysql_prlock_init(key_MDL_lock_rwlock, &m_rwlock);
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
}
virtual ~MDL_lock()
{
mysql_prlock_destroy(&m_rwlock);
}
inline static void destroy(MDL_lock *lock);
public:
/**
These three members are used to make it possible to separate
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
the mdl_locks.m_mutex mutex and MDL_lock::m_rwlock in
MDL_map::find_or_insert() for increased scalability.
The 'm_is_destroyed' member is only set by destroyers that
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
have both the mdl_locks.m_mutex and MDL_lock::m_rwlock, thus
holding any of the mutexes is sufficient to read it.
The 'm_ref_usage; is incremented under protection by
mdl_locks.m_mutex, but when 'm_is_destroyed' is set to TRUE, this
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
member is moved to be protected by the MDL_lock::m_rwlock.
This means that the MDL_map::find_or_insert() which only
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
holds the MDL_lock::m_rwlock can compare it to 'm_ref_release'
without acquiring mdl_locks.m_mutex again and if equal it can also
destroy the lock object safely.
The 'm_ref_release' is incremented under protection by
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
MDL_lock::m_rwlock.
Note since we are only interested in equality of these two
counters we don't have to worry about overflows as long as
their size is big enough to hold maximum number of concurrent
threads on the system.
*/
uint m_ref_usage;
uint m_ref_release;
bool m_is_destroyed;
/**
We use the same idea and an additional version counter to support
caching of unused MDL_lock object for further re-use.
This counter is incremented while holding both MDL_map::m_mutex and
MDL_lock::m_rwlock locks each time when a MDL_lock is moved from
the hash to the unused objects list (or destroyed).
A thread, which has found a MDL_lock object for the key in the hash
and then released the MDL_map::m_mutex before acquiring the
MDL_lock::m_rwlock, can determine that this object was moved to the
unused objects list (or destroyed) while it held no locks by comparing
the version value which it read while holding the MDL_map::m_mutex
with the value read after acquiring the MDL_lock::m_rwlock.
Note that since it takes several years to overflow this counter such
theoretically possible overflows should not have any practical effects.
*/
ulonglong m_version;
};
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
/**
An implementation of the scoped metadata lock. The only locking modes
which are supported at the moment are SHARED and INTENTION EXCLUSIVE
and EXCLUSIVE
*/
class MDL_scoped_lock : public MDL_lock
{
public:
MDL_scoped_lock(const MDL_key *key_arg)
: MDL_lock(key_arg)
{ }
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
virtual const bitmap_t *incompatible_granted_types_bitmap() const
{
return m_granted_incompatible;
}
virtual const bitmap_t *incompatible_waiting_types_bitmap() const
{
return m_waiting_incompatible;
}
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
virtual bool needs_notification(const MDL_ticket *ticket) const
{
return (ticket->get_type() == MDL_SHARED);
}
virtual void notify_conflicting_locks(MDL_context *ctx);
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
Bug#13058122 - DML, LOCK/UNLOCK TABLES AND SELECT LEAD TO FOREVER MDL LOCK Analysis: ---------- While granting MDL lock for the lock requests in wait queue, first the lock is granted to the high priority lock types and then to the low priority lock types. MDL Priority Matrix, +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+ | Locks | | | | | | | | has Priority| | | | | | | | over ---> | S | SR| SW| SU| SNW| SNRW| +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+ | X | + | + | + | + | + | + | +-------------|----|---|---|---|----|-----| | SNRW | - | + | + | - | - | - | +-------------|----|---|---|---|----|-----| | SNW | - | - | + | - | - | - | +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+ Here '+' means, Lock priority is higher. '-' means, Has same priority In the scenario where, *. Lock wait queue has requests of type S/SR/SW/SU. *. And locks of high priority X/SNRW/SNW are requested continuously. In this case, while granting lock, always first high priority lock requests(X/SNRW/SNW) are considered. Low priority locks(S/SR/SW/SU) will not get chance and they will wait forever. In the scenario for which this bug is reported, application executed many LOCK TABLES ... WRITE statements concurrently. These statements request SNRW lock. Also there were some connections trying to execute DML statements requesting SR lock. Since SNRW lock request has higher priority (and as they were too many waiting SNRW requests) lock is always granted to it. So, lock request SR will wait forever, resulting in DML starvation. How is this handled in 5.1? --------------------------- Even in 5.1 we have low priority lock starvation issue. But, in 5.1 thread locking, system variable "max_write_lock_count" can be configured to grant some pending read lock requests. After "max_write_lock_count" of write lock grants all the low priority locks are granted. Why this issue is seen in 5.5/trunk? --------------------------------- In 5.5/trunk MDL locking, "max_write_lock_count" system variable exists but not used in MDL, only thread lock uses it. So no effect of "max_write_lock_count" in MDL locking. This means that starvation of metadata locks is possible even if max_write_lock_count is used. Looks like, customer was using "max_write_lock_count" in 5.1 and when upgraded to 5.5, starvation is seen because of not having effect of "max_write_lock_count" in MDL. Fix: ---------- As a fix, support for max_write_lock_count is added to MDL. To maintain write lock counter per MDL_lock object, new member "m_hog_lock_count" is added in MDL_lock. And following logic is added to increment the counter in function reschedule_waiters, (reschedule_waiters function is called while thread is releasing the lock) - After granting lock request from the wait queue. - Check if there are any S/SR/SU/SW exists in the wait queue - If yes then increment the "m_hog_lock_count" And following logic is added in the same function to handle pending S/SU/SR/SW locks - Before granting locks - Check if max_write_lock_count <= m_hog_lock_count - If Yes, then try to grant S/SR/SW/SU locks. (Since all of these has same priority, all locks are granted together. But some lock grant may fail because of grant incompatibility) - Reset m_hog_lock_count if there no low priority lock requests in wait queue. - return Note: -------------------------- In the lock priority matrix explained above, though X has priority over the SNW and SNRW. X locks is taken mostly for RENAME, TRUNCATE, CREATE ... operations. So lock type X may not be requested in loop continuously in real world applications, as compared to other lock request types. So, lock request of type SNW and SNRW are not starved. So, we can grant all S/SR/SU/SW in one shot, without considering SNW & SNRW lock request starvation. ALTER table operations take SU lock first and then upgrade to SNW if required. All S, SR, SW, SU have same lock priority. So while granting SU, request of types SR, SW, S are also granted in one shot. So, lock request of type SU->SNW in loop will not make other low priority lock request to starve. But, when there is request for lock of type SNRW, lock requests of lower priority types are not granted. And if SNRW is requested in loop continuously then all S, SR, SW, SU are starved. This patch addresses the latter scenario. When we have S/SR/SW/SU in wait queue and if there are - Continuous SNRW lock requests - OR one or more X and Continuous SNRW lock requests. - OR one SNW and Continuous SNRW lock requests. - OR one SNW, one or more X and continuous SNRW lock requests. in wait queue then, S/SR/SW/SU lock request are starved.
2012-08-07 11:48:36 +05:30
/*
In scoped locks, only IX lock request would starve because of X/S. But that
is practically very rare case. So just return 0 from this function.
*/
virtual bitmap_t hog_lock_types_bitmap() const
{
return 0;
}
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
private:
static const bitmap_t m_granted_incompatible[MDL_TYPE_END];
static const bitmap_t m_waiting_incompatible[MDL_TYPE_END];
};
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
/**
An implementation of a per-object lock. Supports SHARED, SHARED_UPGRADABLE,
SHARED HIGH PRIORITY and EXCLUSIVE locks.
*/
class MDL_object_lock : public MDL_lock
{
public:
MDL_object_lock(const MDL_key *key_arg)
: MDL_lock(key_arg)
{ }
/**
Reset unused MDL_object_lock object to represent the lock context for a
different object.
*/
void reset(const MDL_key *new_key)
{
/* We need to change only object's key. */
key.mdl_key_init(new_key);
/* m_granted and m_waiting should be already in the empty/initial state. */
DBUG_ASSERT(is_empty());
/* Object should not be marked as destroyed. */
DBUG_ASSERT(! m_is_destroyed);
/*
Values of the rest of the fields should be preserved between old and
new versions of the object. E.g., m_version and m_ref_usage/release
should be kept intact to properly handle possible remaining references
to the old version of the object.
*/
}
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
virtual const bitmap_t *incompatible_granted_types_bitmap() const
{
return m_granted_incompatible;
}
virtual const bitmap_t *incompatible_waiting_types_bitmap() const
{
return m_waiting_incompatible;
}
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
virtual bool needs_notification(const MDL_ticket *ticket) const
{
return ticket->is_upgradable_or_exclusive();
}
virtual void notify_conflicting_locks(MDL_context *ctx);
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
Bug#13058122 - DML, LOCK/UNLOCK TABLES AND SELECT LEAD TO FOREVER MDL LOCK Analysis: ---------- While granting MDL lock for the lock requests in wait queue, first the lock is granted to the high priority lock types and then to the low priority lock types. MDL Priority Matrix, +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+ | Locks | | | | | | | | has Priority| | | | | | | | over ---> | S | SR| SW| SU| SNW| SNRW| +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+ | X | + | + | + | + | + | + | +-------------|----|---|---|---|----|-----| | SNRW | - | + | + | - | - | - | +-------------|----|---|---|---|----|-----| | SNW | - | - | + | - | - | - | +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+ Here '+' means, Lock priority is higher. '-' means, Has same priority In the scenario where, *. Lock wait queue has requests of type S/SR/SW/SU. *. And locks of high priority X/SNRW/SNW are requested continuously. In this case, while granting lock, always first high priority lock requests(X/SNRW/SNW) are considered. Low priority locks(S/SR/SW/SU) will not get chance and they will wait forever. In the scenario for which this bug is reported, application executed many LOCK TABLES ... WRITE statements concurrently. These statements request SNRW lock. Also there were some connections trying to execute DML statements requesting SR lock. Since SNRW lock request has higher priority (and as they were too many waiting SNRW requests) lock is always granted to it. So, lock request SR will wait forever, resulting in DML starvation. How is this handled in 5.1? --------------------------- Even in 5.1 we have low priority lock starvation issue. But, in 5.1 thread locking, system variable "max_write_lock_count" can be configured to grant some pending read lock requests. After "max_write_lock_count" of write lock grants all the low priority locks are granted. Why this issue is seen in 5.5/trunk? --------------------------------- In 5.5/trunk MDL locking, "max_write_lock_count" system variable exists but not used in MDL, only thread lock uses it. So no effect of "max_write_lock_count" in MDL locking. This means that starvation of metadata locks is possible even if max_write_lock_count is used. Looks like, customer was using "max_write_lock_count" in 5.1 and when upgraded to 5.5, starvation is seen because of not having effect of "max_write_lock_count" in MDL. Fix: ---------- As a fix, support for max_write_lock_count is added to MDL. To maintain write lock counter per MDL_lock object, new member "m_hog_lock_count" is added in MDL_lock. And following logic is added to increment the counter in function reschedule_waiters, (reschedule_waiters function is called while thread is releasing the lock) - After granting lock request from the wait queue. - Check if there are any S/SR/SU/SW exists in the wait queue - If yes then increment the "m_hog_lock_count" And following logic is added in the same function to handle pending S/SU/SR/SW locks - Before granting locks - Check if max_write_lock_count <= m_hog_lock_count - If Yes, then try to grant S/SR/SW/SU locks. (Since all of these has same priority, all locks are granted together. But some lock grant may fail because of grant incompatibility) - Reset m_hog_lock_count if there no low priority lock requests in wait queue. - return Note: -------------------------- In the lock priority matrix explained above, though X has priority over the SNW and SNRW. X locks is taken mostly for RENAME, TRUNCATE, CREATE ... operations. So lock type X may not be requested in loop continuously in real world applications, as compared to other lock request types. So, lock request of type SNW and SNRW are not starved. So, we can grant all S/SR/SU/SW in one shot, without considering SNW & SNRW lock request starvation. ALTER table operations take SU lock first and then upgrade to SNW if required. All S, SR, SW, SU have same lock priority. So while granting SU, request of types SR, SW, S are also granted in one shot. So, lock request of type SU->SNW in loop will not make other low priority lock request to starve. But, when there is request for lock of type SNRW, lock requests of lower priority types are not granted. And if SNRW is requested in loop continuously then all S, SR, SW, SU are starved. This patch addresses the latter scenario. When we have S/SR/SW/SU in wait queue and if there are - Continuous SNRW lock requests - OR one or more X and Continuous SNRW lock requests. - OR one SNW and Continuous SNRW lock requests. - OR one SNW, one or more X and continuous SNRW lock requests. in wait queue then, S/SR/SW/SU lock request are starved.
2012-08-07 11:48:36 +05:30
/*
To prevent starvation, these lock types that are only granted
max_write_lock_count times in a row while other lock types are
waiting.
*/
virtual bitmap_t hog_lock_types_bitmap() const
{
return (MDL_BIT(MDL_SHARED_NO_WRITE) |
MDL_BIT(MDL_SHARED_NO_READ_WRITE) |
MDL_BIT(MDL_EXCLUSIVE));
}
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
private:
static const bitmap_t m_granted_incompatible[MDL_TYPE_END];
static const bitmap_t m_waiting_incompatible[MDL_TYPE_END];
public:
/** Members for linking the object into the list of unused objects. */
MDL_object_lock *next_in_cache, **prev_in_cache;
};
/**
Helper class for linking MDL_object_lock objects into the unused objects list.
*/
class MDL_object_lock_cache_adapter :
public I_P_List_adapter<MDL_object_lock, &MDL_object_lock::next_in_cache,
&MDL_object_lock::prev_in_cache>
{
};
static MDL_map mdl_locks;
/**
Start-up parameter for the maximum size of the unused MDL_lock objects cache.
*/
ulong mdl_locks_cache_size;
extern "C"
{
static uchar *
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
mdl_locks_key(const uchar *record, size_t *length,
my_bool not_used __attribute__((unused)))
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
{
MDL_lock *lock=(MDL_lock*) record;
*length= lock->key.length();
return (uchar*) lock->key.ptr();
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
}
} /* extern "C" */
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
/**
Initialize the metadata locking subsystem.
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
This function is called at server startup.
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
In particular, initializes the new global mutex and
the associated condition variable: LOCK_mdl and COND_mdl.
These locking primitives are implementation details of the MDL
subsystem and are private to it.
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
*/
void mdl_init()
{
DBUG_ASSERT(! mdl_initialized);
mdl_initialized= TRUE;
#ifdef HAVE_PSI_INTERFACE
init_mdl_psi_keys();
#endif
mdl_locks.init();
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
}
/**
Release resources of metadata locking subsystem.
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
Destroys the global mutex and the condition variable.
Called at server shutdown.
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
*/
void mdl_destroy()
{
if (mdl_initialized)
{
mdl_initialized= FALSE;
mdl_locks.destroy();
}
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
}
/** Initialize the global hash containing all MDL locks. */
void MDL_map::init()
{
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
MDL_key global_lock_key(MDL_key::GLOBAL, "", "");
MDL_key commit_lock_key(MDL_key::COMMIT, "", "");
mysql_mutex_init(key_MDL_map_mutex, &m_mutex, NULL);
my_hash_init(&m_locks, &my_charset_bin, 16 /* FIXME */, 0, 0,
mdl_locks_key, 0, 0);
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
m_global_lock= MDL_lock::create(&global_lock_key);
m_commit_lock= MDL_lock::create(&commit_lock_key);
}
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
/**
Destroy the global hash containing all MDL locks.
@pre It must be empty.
*/
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
void MDL_map::destroy()
{
DBUG_ASSERT(!m_locks.records);
mysql_mutex_destroy(&m_mutex);
my_hash_free(&m_locks);
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
MDL_lock::destroy(m_global_lock);
MDL_lock::destroy(m_commit_lock);
MDL_object_lock *lock;
while ((lock= m_unused_locks_cache.pop_front()))
MDL_lock::destroy(lock);
}
/**
Find MDL_lock object corresponding to the key, create it
if it does not exist.
@retval non-NULL - Success. MDL_lock instance for the key with
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
locked MDL_lock::m_rwlock.
@retval NULL - Failure (OOM).
*/
MDL_lock* MDL_map::find_or_insert(const MDL_key *mdl_key)
{
MDL_lock *lock;
my_hash_value_type hash_value;
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
if (mdl_key->mdl_namespace() == MDL_key::GLOBAL ||
mdl_key->mdl_namespace() == MDL_key::COMMIT)
{
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
/*
Avoid locking m_mutex when lock for GLOBAL or COMMIT namespace is
requested. Return pointer to pre-allocated MDL_lock instance instead.
Such an optimization allows to save one mutex lock/unlock for any
statement changing data.
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
It works since these namespaces contain only one element so keys
for them look like '<namespace-id>\0\0'.
*/
DBUG_ASSERT(mdl_key->length() == 3);
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
lock= (mdl_key->mdl_namespace() == MDL_key::GLOBAL) ? m_global_lock :
m_commit_lock;
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
mysql_prlock_wrlock(&lock->m_rwlock);
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
return lock;
}
hash_value= my_calc_hash(&m_locks, mdl_key->ptr(), mdl_key->length());
retry:
mysql_mutex_lock(&m_mutex);
if (!(lock= (MDL_lock*) my_hash_search_using_hash_value(&m_locks,
hash_value,
mdl_key->ptr(),
mdl_key->length())))
{
MDL_object_lock *unused_lock= NULL;
/*
No lock object found so we need to create a new one
or reuse an existing unused object.
*/
if (mdl_key->mdl_namespace() != MDL_key::SCHEMA &&
m_unused_locks_cache.elements())
{
/*
We need a MDL_object_lock type of object and the unused objects
cache has some. Get the first object from the cache and set a new
key for it.
*/
DBUG_ASSERT(mdl_key->mdl_namespace() != MDL_key::GLOBAL &&
mdl_key->mdl_namespace() != MDL_key::COMMIT);
unused_lock= m_unused_locks_cache.pop_front();
unused_lock->reset(mdl_key);
lock= unused_lock;
}
else
{
lock= MDL_lock::create(mdl_key);
}
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
if (!lock || my_hash_insert(&m_locks, (uchar*)lock))
{
if (unused_lock)
{
/*
Note that we can't easily destroy an object from cache here as it
still might be referenced by other threads. So we simply put it
back into the cache.
*/
m_unused_locks_cache.push_front(unused_lock);
}
else
{
MDL_lock::destroy(lock);
}
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
mysql_mutex_unlock(&m_mutex);
return NULL;
}
}
if (move_from_hash_to_lock_mutex(lock))
goto retry;
return lock;
}
/**
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
Release mdl_locks.m_mutex mutex and lock MDL_lock::m_rwlock for lock
object from the hash. Handle situation when object was released
while we held no locks.
@retval FALSE - Success.
@retval TRUE - Object was released while we held no mutex, caller
should re-try looking up MDL_lock object in the hash.
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
*/
bool MDL_map::move_from_hash_to_lock_mutex(MDL_lock *lock)
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
{
ulonglong version;
DBUG_ASSERT(! lock->m_is_destroyed);
mysql_mutex_assert_owner(&m_mutex);
/*
We increment m_ref_usage which is a reference counter protected by
mdl_locks.m_mutex under the condition it is present in the hash and
m_is_destroyed is FALSE.
*/
lock->m_ref_usage++;
/* Read value of the version counter under protection of m_mutex lock. */
version= lock->m_version;
mysql_mutex_unlock(&m_mutex);
mysql_prlock_wrlock(&lock->m_rwlock);
lock->m_ref_release++;
if (unlikely(lock->m_version != version))
{
/*
If the current value of version differs from one that was read while
we held m_mutex mutex, this MDL_lock object was moved to the unused
objects list or destroyed while we held no locks.
We should retry our search. But first we should destroy the MDL_lock
object if necessary.
*/
if (unlikely(lock->m_is_destroyed))
{
/*
Object was released while we held no locks, we need to
release it if no others hold references to it, while our own
reference count ensured that the object as such haven't got
its memory released yet. We can also safely compare
m_ref_usage and m_ref_release since the object is no longer
present in the hash (or unused objects list) so no one will
be able to find it and increment m_ref_usage anymore.
*/
uint ref_usage= lock->m_ref_usage;
uint ref_release= lock->m_ref_release;
mysql_prlock_unlock(&lock->m_rwlock);
if (ref_usage == ref_release)
MDL_lock::destroy(lock);
}
else
{
/*
Object was not destroyed but its version has changed.
This means that it was moved to the unused objects list
(and even might be already re-used). So now it might
correspond to a different key, therefore we should simply
retry our search.
*/
mysql_prlock_unlock(&lock->m_rwlock);
}
return TRUE;
}
return FALSE;
}
/**
Destroy MDL_lock object or delegate this responsibility to
whatever thread that holds the last outstanding reference to
it.
*/
void MDL_map::remove(MDL_lock *lock)
{
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
if (lock->key.mdl_namespace() == MDL_key::GLOBAL ||
lock->key.mdl_namespace() == MDL_key::COMMIT)
{
/*
Never destroy pre-allocated MDL_lock objects for GLOBAL and
COMMIT namespaces.
*/
mysql_prlock_unlock(&lock->m_rwlock);
return;
}
mysql_mutex_lock(&m_mutex);
my_hash_delete(&m_locks, (uchar*) lock);
/*
To let threads holding references to the MDL_lock object know that it was
moved to the list of unused objects or destroyed, we increment the version
counter under protection of both MDL_map::m_mutex and MDL_lock::m_rwlock
locks. This allows us to read the version value while having either one
of those locks.
*/
lock->m_version++;
if ((lock->key.mdl_namespace() != MDL_key::SCHEMA) &&
(m_unused_locks_cache.elements() < mdl_locks_cache_size))
{
/*
This is an object of MDL_object_lock type and the cache of unused
objects has not reached its maximum size yet. So instead of destroying
object we move it to the list of unused objects to allow its later
re-use with possibly different key. Any threads holding references to
this object (owning MDL_map::m_mutex or MDL_lock::m_rwlock) will notice
this thanks to the fact that we have changed the MDL_lock::m_version
counter.
*/
DBUG_ASSERT(lock->key.mdl_namespace() != MDL_key::GLOBAL &&
lock->key.mdl_namespace() != MDL_key::COMMIT);
m_unused_locks_cache.push_front((MDL_object_lock*)lock);
mysql_mutex_unlock(&m_mutex);
mysql_prlock_unlock(&lock->m_rwlock);
}
else
{
/*
Destroy the MDL_lock object, but ensure that anyone that is
holding a reference to the object is not remaining, if so he
has the responsibility to release it.
Setting of m_is_destroyed to TRUE while holding _both_
mdl_locks.m_mutex and MDL_lock::m_rwlock mutexes transfers the
protection of m_ref_usage from mdl_locks.m_mutex to
MDL_lock::m_rwlock while removal of the object from the hash
(and cache of unused objects) makes it read-only. Therefore
whoever acquires MDL_lock::m_rwlock next will see the most up
to date version of m_ref_usage.
This means that when m_is_destroyed is TRUE and we hold the
MDL_lock::m_rwlock we can safely read the m_ref_usage
member.
*/
uint ref_usage, ref_release;
lock->m_is_destroyed= TRUE;
ref_usage= lock->m_ref_usage;
ref_release= lock->m_ref_release;
mysql_mutex_unlock(&m_mutex);
mysql_prlock_unlock(&lock->m_rwlock);
if (ref_usage == ref_release)
MDL_lock::destroy(lock);
}
}
/**
Initialize a metadata locking context.
This is to be called when a new server connection is created.
*/
MDL_context::MDL_context()
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
: m_thd(NULL),
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
m_needs_thr_lock_abort(FALSE),
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
m_waiting_for(NULL)
{
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
mysql_prlock_init(key_MDL_context_LOCK_waiting_for, &m_LOCK_waiting_for);
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
}
/**
Destroy metadata locking context.
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
Assumes and asserts that there are no active or pending locks
associated with this context at the time of the destruction.
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
Currently does nothing. Asserts that there are no pending
or satisfied lock requests. The pending locks must be released
prior to destruction. This is a new way to express the assertion
that all tables are closed before a connection is destroyed.
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
*/
void MDL_context::destroy()
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
{
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
DBUG_ASSERT(m_tickets[MDL_STATEMENT].is_empty() &&
m_tickets[MDL_TRANSACTION].is_empty() &&
m_tickets[MDL_EXPLICIT].is_empty());
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
mysql_prlock_destroy(&m_LOCK_waiting_for);
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
}
/**
Initialize a lock request.
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
This is to be used for every lock request.
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
Note that initialization and allocation are split into two
calls. This is to allow flexible memory management of lock
requests. Normally a lock request is stored in statement memory
(e.g. is a member of struct TABLE_LIST), but we would also like
to allow allocation of lock requests in other memory roots,
for example in the grant subsystem, to lock privilege tables.
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
The MDL subsystem does not own or manage memory of lock requests.
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
@param mdl_namespace Id of namespace of object to be locked
@param db Name of database to which the object belongs
@param name Name of of the object
@param mdl_type The MDL lock type for the request.
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
*/
void MDL_request::init(MDL_key::enum_mdl_namespace mdl_namespace,
const char *db_arg,
const char *name_arg,
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
enum_mdl_type mdl_type_arg,
enum_mdl_duration mdl_duration_arg)
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
{
key.mdl_key_init(mdl_namespace, db_arg, name_arg);
type= mdl_type_arg;
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
duration= mdl_duration_arg;
ticket= NULL;
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
}
/**
Initialize a lock request using pre-built MDL_key.
@sa MDL_request::init(namespace, db, name, type).
@param key_arg The pre-built MDL key for the request.
@param mdl_type_arg The MDL lock type for the request.
*/
void MDL_request::init(const MDL_key *key_arg,
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
enum_mdl_type mdl_type_arg,
enum_mdl_duration mdl_duration_arg)
{
key.mdl_key_init(key_arg);
type= mdl_type_arg;
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
duration= mdl_duration_arg;
ticket= NULL;
}
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
/**
Auxiliary functions needed for creation/destruction of MDL_lock objects.
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
@note Also chooses an MDL_lock descendant appropriate for object namespace.
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
*/
inline MDL_lock *MDL_lock::create(const MDL_key *mdl_key)
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
{
switch (mdl_key->mdl_namespace())
{
case MDL_key::GLOBAL:
case MDL_key::SCHEMA:
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
case MDL_key::COMMIT:
return new MDL_scoped_lock(mdl_key);
default:
return new MDL_object_lock(mdl_key);
}
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
}
void MDL_lock::destroy(MDL_lock *lock)
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
{
delete lock;
}
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
/**
Auxiliary functions needed for creation/destruction of MDL_ticket
objects.
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
@todo This naive implementation should be replaced with one that saves
on memory allocation by reusing released objects.
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
*/
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
MDL_ticket *MDL_ticket::create(MDL_context *ctx_arg, enum_mdl_type type_arg
#ifndef DBUG_OFF
, enum_mdl_duration duration_arg
#endif
)
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
{
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
return new MDL_ticket(ctx_arg, type_arg
#ifndef DBUG_OFF
, duration_arg
#endif
);
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
}
void MDL_ticket::destroy(MDL_ticket *ticket)
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
{
delete ticket;
}
/**
Return the 'weight' of this ticket for the
victim selection algorithm. Requests with
lower weight are preferred to requests
with higher weight when choosing a victim.
*/
uint MDL_ticket::get_deadlock_weight() const
{
return (m_lock->key.mdl_namespace() == MDL_key::GLOBAL ||
Fix for bug #52044 "FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK and FLUSH TABLES <list> WITH READ LOCK are incompatible". The problem was that FLUSH TABLES <list> WITH READ LOCK which was issued when other connection has acquired global read lock using FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK was blocked and has to wait until global read lock is released. This issue stemmed from the fact that FLUSH TABLES <list> WITH READ LOCK implementation has acquired X metadata locks on tables to be flushed. Since these locks required acquiring of global IX lock this statement was incompatible with global read lock. This patch addresses problem by using SNW metadata type of lock for tables to be flushed by FLUSH TABLES <list> WITH READ LOCK. It is OK to acquire them without global IX lock as long as we won't try to upgrade those locks. Since SNW locks allow concurrent statements using same table FLUSH TABLE <list> WITH READ LOCK now has to wait until old versions of tables to be flushed go away after acquiring metadata locks. Since such waiting can lead to deadlock MDL deadlock detector was extended to take into account waits for flush and resolve such deadlocks. As a bonus code in open_tables() which was responsible for waiting old versions of tables to go away was refactored. Now when we encounter old version of table in open_table() we don't back-off and wait for all old version to go away, but instead wait for this particular table to be flushed. Such approach supported by deadlock detection should reduce number of scenarios in which FLUSH TABLES aborts concurrent multi-statement transactions. Note that active FLUSH TABLES <list> WITH READ LOCK still blocks concurrent FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statement as the former keeps tables open and thus prevents the latter statement from doing flush.
2010-07-27 17:34:58 +04:00
m_type >= MDL_SHARED_NO_WRITE ?
DEADLOCK_WEIGHT_DDL : DEADLOCK_WEIGHT_DML);
}
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
/** Construct an empty wait slot. */
MDL_wait::MDL_wait()
:m_wait_status(EMPTY)
{
mysql_mutex_init(key_MDL_wait_LOCK_wait_status, &m_LOCK_wait_status, NULL);
mysql_cond_init(key_MDL_wait_COND_wait_status, &m_COND_wait_status, NULL);
}
/** Destroy system resources. */
MDL_wait::~MDL_wait()
{
mysql_mutex_destroy(&m_LOCK_wait_status);
mysql_cond_destroy(&m_COND_wait_status);
}
/**
Set the status unless it's already set. Return FALSE if set,
TRUE otherwise.
*/
bool MDL_wait::set_status(enum_wait_status status_arg)
{
bool was_occupied= TRUE;
mysql_mutex_lock(&m_LOCK_wait_status);
if (m_wait_status == EMPTY)
{
was_occupied= FALSE;
m_wait_status= status_arg;
mysql_cond_signal(&m_COND_wait_status);
}
mysql_mutex_unlock(&m_LOCK_wait_status);
return was_occupied;
}
/** Query the current value of the wait slot. */
MDL_wait::enum_wait_status MDL_wait::get_status()
{
enum_wait_status result;
mysql_mutex_lock(&m_LOCK_wait_status);
result= m_wait_status;
mysql_mutex_unlock(&m_LOCK_wait_status);
return result;
}
/** Clear the current value of the wait slot. */
void MDL_wait::reset_status()
{
mysql_mutex_lock(&m_LOCK_wait_status);
m_wait_status= EMPTY;
mysql_mutex_unlock(&m_LOCK_wait_status);
}
/**
Wait for the status to be assigned to this wait slot.
@param abs_timeout Absolute time after which waiting should stop.
@param set_status_on_timeout TRUE - If in case of timeout waiting
context should close the wait slot by
sending TIMEOUT to itself.
FALSE - Otherwise.
@param wait_state_name Thread state name to be set for duration of wait.
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
@returns Signal posted.
*/
MDL_wait::enum_wait_status
MDL_wait::timed_wait(THD *thd, struct timespec *abs_timeout,
bool set_status_on_timeout, const char *wait_state_name)
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
{
const char *old_msg;
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
enum_wait_status result;
Bug #45225 Locking: hang if drop table with no timeout This patch introduces timeouts for metadata locks. The timeout is specified in seconds using the new dynamic system variable "lock_wait_timeout" which has both GLOBAL and SESSION scopes. Allowed values range from 1 to 31536000 seconds (= 1 year). The default value is 1 year. The new server parameter "lock-wait-timeout" can be used to set the default value parameter upon server startup. "lock_wait_timeout" applies to all statements that use metadata locks. These include DML and DDL operations on tables, views, stored procedures and stored functions. They also include LOCK TABLES, FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK and HANDLER statements. The patch also changes thr_lock.c code (table data locks used by MyISAM and other simplistic engines) to use the same system variable. InnoDB row locks are unaffected. One exception to the handling of the "lock_wait_timeout" variable is delayed inserts. All delayed inserts are executed with a timeout of 1 year regardless of the setting for the global variable. As the connection issuing the delayed insert gets no notification of delayed insert timeouts, we want to avoid unnecessary timeouts. It's important to note that the timeout value is used for each lock acquired and that one statement can take more than one lock. A statement can therefore block for longer than the lock_wait_timeout value before reporting a timeout error. When lock timeout occurs, ER_LOCK_WAIT_TIMEOUT is reported. Test case added to lock_multi.test.
2010-02-11 11:23:39 +01:00
int wait_result= 0;
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
mysql_mutex_lock(&m_LOCK_wait_status);
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
Bug #55223 assert in Protocol::end_statement during CREATE DATABASE The problem was that a statement could cause an assert if it was aborted by KILL QUERY while it waited on a metadata lock. This assert checks that a statement either sends OK or an error to the client. If the bug was triggered on release builds, it caused OK to be sent to the client instead of ER_QUERY_INTERRUPTED. The root cause of the problem was that there are two separate ways to tell if a statement is killed: thd->killed and mysys_var->abort. KILL QUERY causes both to be set, thd->killed before mysys_var->abort. Also, both values are reset at the end of statement execution. This means that it is possible for KILL QUERY to first set thd->killed, then have the killed statement reset both thd->killed and mysys_var->abort and finally have KILL QUERY set mysys_var->abort. This means that the connection with the killed statement will start executing the next statement with the two values out of sync - i.e. thd->killed not set but mysys_var->abort set. Since mysys_var->abort is used to check if a wait for a metadata lock should be aborted, the next statement would immediately abort any such waiting. When waiting is aborted, no OK message is sent and thd->killed is checked to see if ER_QUERY_INTERRUPTED should be sent to the client. But since the->killed had been reset, neither OK nor an error message was sent to the client. This then triggered the assert. This patch fixes the problem by changing the metadata lock waiting code to check thd->killed. No test case added as reproducing the assert is dependent on very exact timing of two (or more) threads. The patch has been checked using RQG and the grammar posted on the bug report.
2010-07-22 10:00:32 +02:00
old_msg= thd_enter_cond(thd, &m_COND_wait_status, &m_LOCK_wait_status,
wait_state_name);
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
2011-03-04 13:12:31 +01:00
thd_wait_begin(thd, THD_WAIT_META_DATA_LOCK);
Bug #55223 assert in Protocol::end_statement during CREATE DATABASE The problem was that a statement could cause an assert if it was aborted by KILL QUERY while it waited on a metadata lock. This assert checks that a statement either sends OK or an error to the client. If the bug was triggered on release builds, it caused OK to be sent to the client instead of ER_QUERY_INTERRUPTED. The root cause of the problem was that there are two separate ways to tell if a statement is killed: thd->killed and mysys_var->abort. KILL QUERY causes both to be set, thd->killed before mysys_var->abort. Also, both values are reset at the end of statement execution. This means that it is possible for KILL QUERY to first set thd->killed, then have the killed statement reset both thd->killed and mysys_var->abort and finally have KILL QUERY set mysys_var->abort. This means that the connection with the killed statement will start executing the next statement with the two values out of sync - i.e. thd->killed not set but mysys_var->abort set. Since mysys_var->abort is used to check if a wait for a metadata lock should be aborted, the next statement would immediately abort any such waiting. When waiting is aborted, no OK message is sent and thd->killed is checked to see if ER_QUERY_INTERRUPTED should be sent to the client. But since the->killed had been reset, neither OK nor an error message was sent to the client. This then triggered the assert. This patch fixes the problem by changing the metadata lock waiting code to check thd->killed. No test case added as reproducing the assert is dependent on very exact timing of two (or more) threads. The patch has been checked using RQG and the grammar posted on the bug report.
2010-07-22 10:00:32 +02:00
while (!m_wait_status && !thd_killed(thd) &&
Bug #45225 Locking: hang if drop table with no timeout This patch introduces timeouts for metadata locks. The timeout is specified in seconds using the new dynamic system variable "lock_wait_timeout" which has both GLOBAL and SESSION scopes. Allowed values range from 1 to 31536000 seconds (= 1 year). The default value is 1 year. The new server parameter "lock-wait-timeout" can be used to set the default value parameter upon server startup. "lock_wait_timeout" applies to all statements that use metadata locks. These include DML and DDL operations on tables, views, stored procedures and stored functions. They also include LOCK TABLES, FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK and HANDLER statements. The patch also changes thr_lock.c code (table data locks used by MyISAM and other simplistic engines) to use the same system variable. InnoDB row locks are unaffected. One exception to the handling of the "lock_wait_timeout" variable is delayed inserts. All delayed inserts are executed with a timeout of 1 year regardless of the setting for the global variable. As the connection issuing the delayed insert gets no notification of delayed insert timeouts, we want to avoid unnecessary timeouts. It's important to note that the timeout value is used for each lock acquired and that one statement can take more than one lock. A statement can therefore block for longer than the lock_wait_timeout value before reporting a timeout error. When lock timeout occurs, ER_LOCK_WAIT_TIMEOUT is reported. Test case added to lock_multi.test.
2010-02-11 11:23:39 +01:00
wait_result != ETIMEDOUT && wait_result != ETIME)
{
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
wait_result= mysql_cond_timedwait(&m_COND_wait_status, &m_LOCK_wait_status,
Bug #45225 Locking: hang if drop table with no timeout This patch introduces timeouts for metadata locks. The timeout is specified in seconds using the new dynamic system variable "lock_wait_timeout" which has both GLOBAL and SESSION scopes. Allowed values range from 1 to 31536000 seconds (= 1 year). The default value is 1 year. The new server parameter "lock-wait-timeout" can be used to set the default value parameter upon server startup. "lock_wait_timeout" applies to all statements that use metadata locks. These include DML and DDL operations on tables, views, stored procedures and stored functions. They also include LOCK TABLES, FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK and HANDLER statements. The patch also changes thr_lock.c code (table data locks used by MyISAM and other simplistic engines) to use the same system variable. InnoDB row locks are unaffected. One exception to the handling of the "lock_wait_timeout" variable is delayed inserts. All delayed inserts are executed with a timeout of 1 year regardless of the setting for the global variable. As the connection issuing the delayed insert gets no notification of delayed insert timeouts, we want to avoid unnecessary timeouts. It's important to note that the timeout value is used for each lock acquired and that one statement can take more than one lock. A statement can therefore block for longer than the lock_wait_timeout value before reporting a timeout error. When lock timeout occurs, ER_LOCK_WAIT_TIMEOUT is reported. Test case added to lock_multi.test.
2010-02-11 11:23:39 +01:00
abs_timeout);
}
2011-03-04 13:12:31 +01:00
thd_wait_end(thd);
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
if (m_wait_status == EMPTY)
{
/*
Wait has ended not due to a status being set from another
thread but due to this connection/statement being killed or a
time out.
To avoid races, which may occur if another thread sets
GRANTED status before the code which calls this method
processes the abort/timeout, we assign the status under
protection of the m_LOCK_wait_status, within the critical
section. An exception is when set_status_on_timeout is
false, which means that the caller intends to restart the
wait.
*/
Bug #55223 assert in Protocol::end_statement during CREATE DATABASE The problem was that a statement could cause an assert if it was aborted by KILL QUERY while it waited on a metadata lock. This assert checks that a statement either sends OK or an error to the client. If the bug was triggered on release builds, it caused OK to be sent to the client instead of ER_QUERY_INTERRUPTED. The root cause of the problem was that there are two separate ways to tell if a statement is killed: thd->killed and mysys_var->abort. KILL QUERY causes both to be set, thd->killed before mysys_var->abort. Also, both values are reset at the end of statement execution. This means that it is possible for KILL QUERY to first set thd->killed, then have the killed statement reset both thd->killed and mysys_var->abort and finally have KILL QUERY set mysys_var->abort. This means that the connection with the killed statement will start executing the next statement with the two values out of sync - i.e. thd->killed not set but mysys_var->abort set. Since mysys_var->abort is used to check if a wait for a metadata lock should be aborted, the next statement would immediately abort any such waiting. When waiting is aborted, no OK message is sent and thd->killed is checked to see if ER_QUERY_INTERRUPTED should be sent to the client. But since the->killed had been reset, neither OK nor an error message was sent to the client. This then triggered the assert. This patch fixes the problem by changing the metadata lock waiting code to check thd->killed. No test case added as reproducing the assert is dependent on very exact timing of two (or more) threads. The patch has been checked using RQG and the grammar posted on the bug report.
2010-07-22 10:00:32 +02:00
if (thd_killed(thd))
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
m_wait_status= KILLED;
else if (set_status_on_timeout)
m_wait_status= TIMEOUT;
}
result= m_wait_status;
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
Bug #55223 assert in Protocol::end_statement during CREATE DATABASE The problem was that a statement could cause an assert if it was aborted by KILL QUERY while it waited on a metadata lock. This assert checks that a statement either sends OK or an error to the client. If the bug was triggered on release builds, it caused OK to be sent to the client instead of ER_QUERY_INTERRUPTED. The root cause of the problem was that there are two separate ways to tell if a statement is killed: thd->killed and mysys_var->abort. KILL QUERY causes both to be set, thd->killed before mysys_var->abort. Also, both values are reset at the end of statement execution. This means that it is possible for KILL QUERY to first set thd->killed, then have the killed statement reset both thd->killed and mysys_var->abort and finally have KILL QUERY set mysys_var->abort. This means that the connection with the killed statement will start executing the next statement with the two values out of sync - i.e. thd->killed not set but mysys_var->abort set. Since mysys_var->abort is used to check if a wait for a metadata lock should be aborted, the next statement would immediately abort any such waiting. When waiting is aborted, no OK message is sent and thd->killed is checked to see if ER_QUERY_INTERRUPTED should be sent to the client. But since the->killed had been reset, neither OK nor an error message was sent to the client. This then triggered the assert. This patch fixes the problem by changing the metadata lock waiting code to check thd->killed. No test case added as reproducing the assert is dependent on very exact timing of two (or more) threads. The patch has been checked using RQG and the grammar posted on the bug report.
2010-07-22 10:00:32 +02:00
thd_exit_cond(thd, old_msg);
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
return result;
}
/**
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
Clear bit corresponding to the type of metadata lock in bitmap representing
set of such types if list of tickets does not contain ticket with such type.
@param[in,out] bitmap Bitmap representing set of types of locks.
@param[in] list List to inspect.
@param[in] type Type of metadata lock to look up in the list.
*/
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
void MDL_lock::Ticket_list::clear_bit_if_not_in_list(enum_mdl_type type)
{
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
MDL_lock::Ticket_iterator it(m_list);
const MDL_ticket *ticket;
while ((ticket= it++))
if (ticket->get_type() == type)
return;
m_bitmap&= ~ MDL_BIT(type);
}
/**
Add ticket to MDL_lock's list of waiting requests and
update corresponding bitmap of lock types.
*/
void MDL_lock::Ticket_list::add_ticket(MDL_ticket *ticket)
{
/*
Ticket being added to the list must have MDL_ticket::m_lock set,
since for such tickets methods accessing this member might be
called by other threads.
*/
DBUG_ASSERT(ticket->get_lock());
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
/*
Add ticket to the *back* of the queue to ensure fairness
among requests with the same priority.
*/
m_list.push_back(ticket);
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
m_bitmap|= MDL_BIT(ticket->get_type());
}
/**
Remove ticket from MDL_lock's list of requests and
update corresponding bitmap of lock types.
*/
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
void MDL_lock::Ticket_list::remove_ticket(MDL_ticket *ticket)
{
m_list.remove(ticket);
/*
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
Check if waiting queue has another ticket with the same type as
one which was removed. If there is no such ticket, i.e. we have
removed last ticket of particular type, then we need to update
bitmap of waiting ticket's types.
Note that in most common case, i.e. when shared lock is removed
from waiting queue, we are likely to find ticket of the same
type early without performing full iteration through the list.
So this method should not be too expensive.
*/
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
clear_bit_if_not_in_list(ticket->get_type());
}
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
/**
Determine waiting contexts which requests for the lock can be
satisfied, grant lock to them and wake them up.
@note Together with MDL_lock::add_ticket() this method implements
fair scheduling among requests with the same priority.
It tries to grant lock from the head of waiters list, while
add_ticket() adds new requests to the back of this list.
*/
void MDL_lock::reschedule_waiters()
{
MDL_lock::Ticket_iterator it(m_waiting);
MDL_ticket *ticket;
Bug#13058122 - DML, LOCK/UNLOCK TABLES AND SELECT LEAD TO FOREVER MDL LOCK Analysis: ---------- While granting MDL lock for the lock requests in wait queue, first the lock is granted to the high priority lock types and then to the low priority lock types. MDL Priority Matrix, +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+ | Locks | | | | | | | | has Priority| | | | | | | | over ---> | S | SR| SW| SU| SNW| SNRW| +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+ | X | + | + | + | + | + | + | +-------------|----|---|---|---|----|-----| | SNRW | - | + | + | - | - | - | +-------------|----|---|---|---|----|-----| | SNW | - | - | + | - | - | - | +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+ Here '+' means, Lock priority is higher. '-' means, Has same priority In the scenario where, *. Lock wait queue has requests of type S/SR/SW/SU. *. And locks of high priority X/SNRW/SNW are requested continuously. In this case, while granting lock, always first high priority lock requests(X/SNRW/SNW) are considered. Low priority locks(S/SR/SW/SU) will not get chance and they will wait forever. In the scenario for which this bug is reported, application executed many LOCK TABLES ... WRITE statements concurrently. These statements request SNRW lock. Also there were some connections trying to execute DML statements requesting SR lock. Since SNRW lock request has higher priority (and as they were too many waiting SNRW requests) lock is always granted to it. So, lock request SR will wait forever, resulting in DML starvation. How is this handled in 5.1? --------------------------- Even in 5.1 we have low priority lock starvation issue. But, in 5.1 thread locking, system variable "max_write_lock_count" can be configured to grant some pending read lock requests. After "max_write_lock_count" of write lock grants all the low priority locks are granted. Why this issue is seen in 5.5/trunk? --------------------------------- In 5.5/trunk MDL locking, "max_write_lock_count" system variable exists but not used in MDL, only thread lock uses it. So no effect of "max_write_lock_count" in MDL locking. This means that starvation of metadata locks is possible even if max_write_lock_count is used. Looks like, customer was using "max_write_lock_count" in 5.1 and when upgraded to 5.5, starvation is seen because of not having effect of "max_write_lock_count" in MDL. Fix: ---------- As a fix, support for max_write_lock_count is added to MDL. To maintain write lock counter per MDL_lock object, new member "m_hog_lock_count" is added in MDL_lock. And following logic is added to increment the counter in function reschedule_waiters, (reschedule_waiters function is called while thread is releasing the lock) - After granting lock request from the wait queue. - Check if there are any S/SR/SU/SW exists in the wait queue - If yes then increment the "m_hog_lock_count" And following logic is added in the same function to handle pending S/SU/SR/SW locks - Before granting locks - Check if max_write_lock_count <= m_hog_lock_count - If Yes, then try to grant S/SR/SW/SU locks. (Since all of these has same priority, all locks are granted together. But some lock grant may fail because of grant incompatibility) - Reset m_hog_lock_count if there no low priority lock requests in wait queue. - return Note: -------------------------- In the lock priority matrix explained above, though X has priority over the SNW and SNRW. X locks is taken mostly for RENAME, TRUNCATE, CREATE ... operations. So lock type X may not be requested in loop continuously in real world applications, as compared to other lock request types. So, lock request of type SNW and SNRW are not starved. So, we can grant all S/SR/SU/SW in one shot, without considering SNW & SNRW lock request starvation. ALTER table operations take SU lock first and then upgrade to SNW if required. All S, SR, SW, SU have same lock priority. So while granting SU, request of types SR, SW, S are also granted in one shot. So, lock request of type SU->SNW in loop will not make other low priority lock request to starve. But, when there is request for lock of type SNRW, lock requests of lower priority types are not granted. And if SNRW is requested in loop continuously then all S, SR, SW, SU are starved. This patch addresses the latter scenario. When we have S/SR/SW/SU in wait queue and if there are - Continuous SNRW lock requests - OR one or more X and Continuous SNRW lock requests. - OR one SNW and Continuous SNRW lock requests. - OR one SNW, one or more X and continuous SNRW lock requests. in wait queue then, S/SR/SW/SU lock request are starved.
2012-08-07 11:48:36 +05:30
bool skip_high_priority= false;
bitmap_t hog_lock_types= hog_lock_types_bitmap();
if (m_hog_lock_count >= max_write_lock_count)
{
/*
If number of successively granted high-prio, strong locks has exceeded
max_write_lock_count give a way to low-prio, weak locks to avoid their
starvation.
*/
if ((m_waiting.bitmap() & ~hog_lock_types) != 0)
{
/*
Even though normally when m_hog_lock_count is non-0 there is
some pending low-prio lock, we still can encounter situation
when m_hog_lock_count is non-0 and there are no pending low-prio
locks. This, for example, can happen when a ticket for pending
low-prio lock was removed from waiters list due to timeout,
and reschedule_waiters() is called after that to update the
waiters queue. m_hog_lock_count will be reset to 0 at the
end of this call in such case.
Note that it is not an issue if we fail to wake up any pending
waiters for weak locks in the loop below. This would mean that
all of them are either killed, timed out or chosen as a victim
by deadlock resolver, but have not managed to remove ticket
from the waiters list yet. After tickets will be removed from
the waiters queue there will be another call to
reschedule_waiters() with pending bitmap updated to reflect new
state of waiters queue.
*/
skip_high_priority= true;
}
}
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
/*
Find the first (and hence the oldest) waiting request which
can be satisfied (taking into account priority). Grant lock to it.
Repeat the process for the remainder of waiters.
Note we don't need to re-start iteration from the head of the
list after satisfying the first suitable request as in our case
all compatible types of requests have the same priority.
TODO/FIXME: We should:
- Either switch to scheduling without priorities
which will allow to stop iteration through the
list of waiters once we found the first ticket
which can't be satisfied
- Or implement some check using bitmaps which will
allow to stop iteration in cases when, e.g., we
grant SNRW lock and there are no pending S or
SH locks.
*/
while ((ticket= it++))
{
Bug#13058122 - DML, LOCK/UNLOCK TABLES AND SELECT LEAD TO FOREVER MDL LOCK Analysis: ---------- While granting MDL lock for the lock requests in wait queue, first the lock is granted to the high priority lock types and then to the low priority lock types. MDL Priority Matrix, +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+ | Locks | | | | | | | | has Priority| | | | | | | | over ---> | S | SR| SW| SU| SNW| SNRW| +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+ | X | + | + | + | + | + | + | +-------------|----|---|---|---|----|-----| | SNRW | - | + | + | - | - | - | +-------------|----|---|---|---|----|-----| | SNW | - | - | + | - | - | - | +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+ Here '+' means, Lock priority is higher. '-' means, Has same priority In the scenario where, *. Lock wait queue has requests of type S/SR/SW/SU. *. And locks of high priority X/SNRW/SNW are requested continuously. In this case, while granting lock, always first high priority lock requests(X/SNRW/SNW) are considered. Low priority locks(S/SR/SW/SU) will not get chance and they will wait forever. In the scenario for which this bug is reported, application executed many LOCK TABLES ... WRITE statements concurrently. These statements request SNRW lock. Also there were some connections trying to execute DML statements requesting SR lock. Since SNRW lock request has higher priority (and as they were too many waiting SNRW requests) lock is always granted to it. So, lock request SR will wait forever, resulting in DML starvation. How is this handled in 5.1? --------------------------- Even in 5.1 we have low priority lock starvation issue. But, in 5.1 thread locking, system variable "max_write_lock_count" can be configured to grant some pending read lock requests. After "max_write_lock_count" of write lock grants all the low priority locks are granted. Why this issue is seen in 5.5/trunk? --------------------------------- In 5.5/trunk MDL locking, "max_write_lock_count" system variable exists but not used in MDL, only thread lock uses it. So no effect of "max_write_lock_count" in MDL locking. This means that starvation of metadata locks is possible even if max_write_lock_count is used. Looks like, customer was using "max_write_lock_count" in 5.1 and when upgraded to 5.5, starvation is seen because of not having effect of "max_write_lock_count" in MDL. Fix: ---------- As a fix, support for max_write_lock_count is added to MDL. To maintain write lock counter per MDL_lock object, new member "m_hog_lock_count" is added in MDL_lock. And following logic is added to increment the counter in function reschedule_waiters, (reschedule_waiters function is called while thread is releasing the lock) - After granting lock request from the wait queue. - Check if there are any S/SR/SU/SW exists in the wait queue - If yes then increment the "m_hog_lock_count" And following logic is added in the same function to handle pending S/SU/SR/SW locks - Before granting locks - Check if max_write_lock_count <= m_hog_lock_count - If Yes, then try to grant S/SR/SW/SU locks. (Since all of these has same priority, all locks are granted together. But some lock grant may fail because of grant incompatibility) - Reset m_hog_lock_count if there no low priority lock requests in wait queue. - return Note: -------------------------- In the lock priority matrix explained above, though X has priority over the SNW and SNRW. X locks is taken mostly for RENAME, TRUNCATE, CREATE ... operations. So lock type X may not be requested in loop continuously in real world applications, as compared to other lock request types. So, lock request of type SNW and SNRW are not starved. So, we can grant all S/SR/SU/SW in one shot, without considering SNW & SNRW lock request starvation. ALTER table operations take SU lock first and then upgrade to SNW if required. All S, SR, SW, SU have same lock priority. So while granting SU, request of types SR, SW, S are also granted in one shot. So, lock request of type SU->SNW in loop will not make other low priority lock request to starve. But, when there is request for lock of type SNRW, lock requests of lower priority types are not granted. And if SNRW is requested in loop continuously then all S, SR, SW, SU are starved. This patch addresses the latter scenario. When we have S/SR/SW/SU in wait queue and if there are - Continuous SNRW lock requests - OR one or more X and Continuous SNRW lock requests. - OR one SNW and Continuous SNRW lock requests. - OR one SNW, one or more X and continuous SNRW lock requests. in wait queue then, S/SR/SW/SU lock request are starved.
2012-08-07 11:48:36 +05:30
/*
Skip high-prio, strong locks if earlier we have decided to give way to
low-prio, weaker locks.
*/
if (skip_high_priority &&
((MDL_BIT(ticket->get_type()) & hog_lock_types) != 0))
continue;
if (can_grant_lock(ticket->get_type(), ticket->get_ctx(),
skip_high_priority))
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
{
if (! ticket->get_ctx()->m_wait.set_status(MDL_wait::GRANTED))
{
/*
Satisfy the found request by updating lock structures.
It is OK to do so even after waking up the waiter since any
session which tries to get any information about the state of
this lock has to acquire MDL_lock::m_rwlock first and thus,
when manages to do so, already sees an updated state of the
MDL_lock object.
*/
m_waiting.remove_ticket(ticket);
m_granted.add_ticket(ticket);
Bug#13058122 - DML, LOCK/UNLOCK TABLES AND SELECT LEAD TO FOREVER MDL LOCK Analysis: ---------- While granting MDL lock for the lock requests in wait queue, first the lock is granted to the high priority lock types and then to the low priority lock types. MDL Priority Matrix, +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+ | Locks | | | | | | | | has Priority| | | | | | | | over ---> | S | SR| SW| SU| SNW| SNRW| +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+ | X | + | + | + | + | + | + | +-------------|----|---|---|---|----|-----| | SNRW | - | + | + | - | - | - | +-------------|----|---|---|---|----|-----| | SNW | - | - | + | - | - | - | +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+ Here '+' means, Lock priority is higher. '-' means, Has same priority In the scenario where, *. Lock wait queue has requests of type S/SR/SW/SU. *. And locks of high priority X/SNRW/SNW are requested continuously. In this case, while granting lock, always first high priority lock requests(X/SNRW/SNW) are considered. Low priority locks(S/SR/SW/SU) will not get chance and they will wait forever. In the scenario for which this bug is reported, application executed many LOCK TABLES ... WRITE statements concurrently. These statements request SNRW lock. Also there were some connections trying to execute DML statements requesting SR lock. Since SNRW lock request has higher priority (and as they were too many waiting SNRW requests) lock is always granted to it. So, lock request SR will wait forever, resulting in DML starvation. How is this handled in 5.1? --------------------------- Even in 5.1 we have low priority lock starvation issue. But, in 5.1 thread locking, system variable "max_write_lock_count" can be configured to grant some pending read lock requests. After "max_write_lock_count" of write lock grants all the low priority locks are granted. Why this issue is seen in 5.5/trunk? --------------------------------- In 5.5/trunk MDL locking, "max_write_lock_count" system variable exists but not used in MDL, only thread lock uses it. So no effect of "max_write_lock_count" in MDL locking. This means that starvation of metadata locks is possible even if max_write_lock_count is used. Looks like, customer was using "max_write_lock_count" in 5.1 and when upgraded to 5.5, starvation is seen because of not having effect of "max_write_lock_count" in MDL. Fix: ---------- As a fix, support for max_write_lock_count is added to MDL. To maintain write lock counter per MDL_lock object, new member "m_hog_lock_count" is added in MDL_lock. And following logic is added to increment the counter in function reschedule_waiters, (reschedule_waiters function is called while thread is releasing the lock) - After granting lock request from the wait queue. - Check if there are any S/SR/SU/SW exists in the wait queue - If yes then increment the "m_hog_lock_count" And following logic is added in the same function to handle pending S/SU/SR/SW locks - Before granting locks - Check if max_write_lock_count <= m_hog_lock_count - If Yes, then try to grant S/SR/SW/SU locks. (Since all of these has same priority, all locks are granted together. But some lock grant may fail because of grant incompatibility) - Reset m_hog_lock_count if there no low priority lock requests in wait queue. - return Note: -------------------------- In the lock priority matrix explained above, though X has priority over the SNW and SNRW. X locks is taken mostly for RENAME, TRUNCATE, CREATE ... operations. So lock type X may not be requested in loop continuously in real world applications, as compared to other lock request types. So, lock request of type SNW and SNRW are not starved. So, we can grant all S/SR/SU/SW in one shot, without considering SNW & SNRW lock request starvation. ALTER table operations take SU lock first and then upgrade to SNW if required. All S, SR, SW, SU have same lock priority. So while granting SU, request of types SR, SW, S are also granted in one shot. So, lock request of type SU->SNW in loop will not make other low priority lock request to starve. But, when there is request for lock of type SNRW, lock requests of lower priority types are not granted. And if SNRW is requested in loop continuously then all S, SR, SW, SU are starved. This patch addresses the latter scenario. When we have S/SR/SW/SU in wait queue and if there are - Continuous SNRW lock requests - OR one or more X and Continuous SNRW lock requests. - OR one SNW and Continuous SNRW lock requests. - OR one SNW, one or more X and continuous SNRW lock requests. in wait queue then, S/SR/SW/SU lock request are starved.
2012-08-07 11:48:36 +05:30
/*
Increase counter of successively granted high-priority strong locks,
if we have granted one.
*/
if ((MDL_BIT(ticket->get_type()) & hog_lock_types) != 0)
m_hog_lock_count++;
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
}
/*
If we could not update the wait slot of the waiter,
it can be due to fact that its connection/statement was
killed or it has timed out (i.e. the slot is not empty).
Since in all such cases the waiter assumes that the lock was
not been granted, we should keep the request in the waiting
queue and look for another request to reschedule.
*/
}
}
Bug#13058122 - DML, LOCK/UNLOCK TABLES AND SELECT LEAD TO FOREVER MDL LOCK Analysis: ---------- While granting MDL lock for the lock requests in wait queue, first the lock is granted to the high priority lock types and then to the low priority lock types. MDL Priority Matrix, +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+ | Locks | | | | | | | | has Priority| | | | | | | | over ---> | S | SR| SW| SU| SNW| SNRW| +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+ | X | + | + | + | + | + | + | +-------------|----|---|---|---|----|-----| | SNRW | - | + | + | - | - | - | +-------------|----|---|---|---|----|-----| | SNW | - | - | + | - | - | - | +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+ Here '+' means, Lock priority is higher. '-' means, Has same priority In the scenario where, *. Lock wait queue has requests of type S/SR/SW/SU. *. And locks of high priority X/SNRW/SNW are requested continuously. In this case, while granting lock, always first high priority lock requests(X/SNRW/SNW) are considered. Low priority locks(S/SR/SW/SU) will not get chance and they will wait forever. In the scenario for which this bug is reported, application executed many LOCK TABLES ... WRITE statements concurrently. These statements request SNRW lock. Also there were some connections trying to execute DML statements requesting SR lock. Since SNRW lock request has higher priority (and as they were too many waiting SNRW requests) lock is always granted to it. So, lock request SR will wait forever, resulting in DML starvation. How is this handled in 5.1? --------------------------- Even in 5.1 we have low priority lock starvation issue. But, in 5.1 thread locking, system variable "max_write_lock_count" can be configured to grant some pending read lock requests. After "max_write_lock_count" of write lock grants all the low priority locks are granted. Why this issue is seen in 5.5/trunk? --------------------------------- In 5.5/trunk MDL locking, "max_write_lock_count" system variable exists but not used in MDL, only thread lock uses it. So no effect of "max_write_lock_count" in MDL locking. This means that starvation of metadata locks is possible even if max_write_lock_count is used. Looks like, customer was using "max_write_lock_count" in 5.1 and when upgraded to 5.5, starvation is seen because of not having effect of "max_write_lock_count" in MDL. Fix: ---------- As a fix, support for max_write_lock_count is added to MDL. To maintain write lock counter per MDL_lock object, new member "m_hog_lock_count" is added in MDL_lock. And following logic is added to increment the counter in function reschedule_waiters, (reschedule_waiters function is called while thread is releasing the lock) - After granting lock request from the wait queue. - Check if there are any S/SR/SU/SW exists in the wait queue - If yes then increment the "m_hog_lock_count" And following logic is added in the same function to handle pending S/SU/SR/SW locks - Before granting locks - Check if max_write_lock_count <= m_hog_lock_count - If Yes, then try to grant S/SR/SW/SU locks. (Since all of these has same priority, all locks are granted together. But some lock grant may fail because of grant incompatibility) - Reset m_hog_lock_count if there no low priority lock requests in wait queue. - return Note: -------------------------- In the lock priority matrix explained above, though X has priority over the SNW and SNRW. X locks is taken mostly for RENAME, TRUNCATE, CREATE ... operations. So lock type X may not be requested in loop continuously in real world applications, as compared to other lock request types. So, lock request of type SNW and SNRW are not starved. So, we can grant all S/SR/SU/SW in one shot, without considering SNW & SNRW lock request starvation. ALTER table operations take SU lock first and then upgrade to SNW if required. All S, SR, SW, SU have same lock priority. So while granting SU, request of types SR, SW, S are also granted in one shot. So, lock request of type SU->SNW in loop will not make other low priority lock request to starve. But, when there is request for lock of type SNRW, lock requests of lower priority types are not granted. And if SNRW is requested in loop continuously then all S, SR, SW, SU are starved. This patch addresses the latter scenario. When we have S/SR/SW/SU in wait queue and if there are - Continuous SNRW lock requests - OR one or more X and Continuous SNRW lock requests. - OR one SNW and Continuous SNRW lock requests. - OR one SNW, one or more X and continuous SNRW lock requests. in wait queue then, S/SR/SW/SU lock request are starved.
2012-08-07 11:48:36 +05:30
if ((m_waiting.bitmap() & ~hog_lock_types) == 0)
{
/*
Reset number of successively granted high-prio, strong locks
if there are no pending low-prio, weak locks.
This ensures:
- That m_hog_lock_count is correctly reset after strong lock
is released and weak locks are granted (or there are no
other lock requests).
- That situation when SNW lock is granted along with some SR
locks, but SW locks are still blocked are handled correctly.
- That m_hog_lock_count is zero in most cases when there are no pending
weak locks (see comment at the start of this method for example of
exception). This allows to save on checks at the start of this method.
*/
m_hog_lock_count= 0;
}
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
}
/**
Compatibility (or rather "incompatibility") matrices for scoped metadata
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
lock. Arrays of bitmaps which elements specify which granted/waiting locks
are incompatible with type of lock being requested.
Here is how types of individual locks are translated to type of scoped lock:
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
----------------+-------------+
Type of request | Correspond. |
for indiv. lock | scoped lock |
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
----------------+-------------+
S, SH, SR, SW | IS |
SNW, SNRW, X | IX |
SNW, SNRW -> X | IX (*) |
The first array specifies if particular type of request can be satisfied
if there is granted scoped lock of certain type.
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
| Type of active |
Request | scoped lock |
type | IS(**) IX S X |
---------+------------------+
IS | + + + + |
IX | + + - - |
S | + - + - |
X | + - - - |
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
The second array specifies if particular type of request can be satisfied
if there is already waiting request for the scoped lock of certain type.
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
I.e. it specifies what is the priority of different lock types.
| Pending |
Request | scoped lock |
type | IS(**) IX S X |
---------+-----------------+
IS | + + + + |
IX | + + - - |
S | + + + - |
X | + + + + |
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
Here: "+" -- means that request can be satisfied
"-" -- means that request can't be satisfied and should wait
(*) Since for upgradable locks we always take intention exclusive scoped
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
lock at the same time when obtaining the shared lock, there is no
need to obtain such lock during the upgrade itself.
(**) Since intention shared scoped locks are compatible with all other
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
type of locks we don't even have any accounting for them.
*/
const MDL_lock::bitmap_t MDL_scoped_lock::m_granted_incompatible[MDL_TYPE_END] =
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
{
MDL_BIT(MDL_EXCLUSIVE) | MDL_BIT(MDL_SHARED),
MDL_BIT(MDL_EXCLUSIVE) | MDL_BIT(MDL_INTENTION_EXCLUSIVE), 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
MDL_BIT(MDL_EXCLUSIVE) | MDL_BIT(MDL_SHARED) | MDL_BIT(MDL_INTENTION_EXCLUSIVE)
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
};
const MDL_lock::bitmap_t MDL_scoped_lock::m_waiting_incompatible[MDL_TYPE_END] =
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
{
MDL_BIT(MDL_EXCLUSIVE) | MDL_BIT(MDL_SHARED),
MDL_BIT(MDL_EXCLUSIVE), 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
};
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
/**
Compatibility (or rather "incompatibility") matrices for per-object
metadata lock. Arrays of bitmaps which elements specify which granted/
waiting locks are incompatible with type of lock being requested.
The first array specifies if particular type of request can be satisfied
if there is granted lock of certain type.
Request | Granted requests for lock |
type | S SH SR SW SNW SNRW X |
----------+------------------------------+
S | + + + + + + - |
SH | + + + + + + - |
SR | + + + + + - - |
SW | + + + + - - - |
SNW | + + + - - - - |
SNRW | + + - - - - - |
X | - - - - - - - |
SNW -> X | - - - 0 0 0 0 |
SNRW -> X | - - 0 0 0 0 0 |
The second array specifies if particular type of request can be satisfied
if there is waiting request for the same lock of certain type. In other
words it specifies what is the priority of different lock types.
Request | Pending requests for lock |
type | S SH SR SW SNW SNRW X |
----------+-----------------------------+
S | + + + + + + - |
SH | + + + + + + + |
SR | + + + + + - - |
SW | + + + + - - - |
SNW | + + + + + + - |
SNRW | + + + + + + - |
X | + + + + + + + |
SNW -> X | + + + + + + + |
SNRW -> X | + + + + + + + |
Here: "+" -- means that request can be satisfied
"-" -- means that request can't be satisfied and should wait
"0" -- means impossible situation which will trigger assert
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
@note In cases then current context already has "stronger" type
of lock on the object it will be automatically granted
thanks to usage of the MDL_context::find_ticket() method.
*/
const MDL_lock::bitmap_t
MDL_object_lock::m_granted_incompatible[MDL_TYPE_END] =
{
0,
MDL_BIT(MDL_EXCLUSIVE),
MDL_BIT(MDL_EXCLUSIVE),
MDL_BIT(MDL_EXCLUSIVE) | MDL_BIT(MDL_SHARED_NO_READ_WRITE),
MDL_BIT(MDL_EXCLUSIVE) | MDL_BIT(MDL_SHARED_NO_READ_WRITE) |
MDL_BIT(MDL_SHARED_NO_WRITE),
MDL_BIT(MDL_EXCLUSIVE) | MDL_BIT(MDL_SHARED_NO_READ_WRITE) |
MDL_BIT(MDL_SHARED_NO_WRITE) | MDL_BIT(MDL_SHARED_WRITE),
MDL_BIT(MDL_EXCLUSIVE) | MDL_BIT(MDL_SHARED_NO_READ_WRITE) |
MDL_BIT(MDL_SHARED_NO_WRITE) | MDL_BIT(MDL_SHARED_WRITE) |
MDL_BIT(MDL_SHARED_READ),
MDL_BIT(MDL_EXCLUSIVE) | MDL_BIT(MDL_SHARED_NO_READ_WRITE) |
MDL_BIT(MDL_SHARED_NO_WRITE) | MDL_BIT(MDL_SHARED_WRITE) |
MDL_BIT(MDL_SHARED_READ) | MDL_BIT(MDL_SHARED_HIGH_PRIO) |
MDL_BIT(MDL_SHARED)
};
const MDL_lock::bitmap_t
MDL_object_lock::m_waiting_incompatible[MDL_TYPE_END] =
{
0,
MDL_BIT(MDL_EXCLUSIVE),
0,
MDL_BIT(MDL_EXCLUSIVE) | MDL_BIT(MDL_SHARED_NO_READ_WRITE),
MDL_BIT(MDL_EXCLUSIVE) | MDL_BIT(MDL_SHARED_NO_READ_WRITE) |
MDL_BIT(MDL_SHARED_NO_WRITE),
MDL_BIT(MDL_EXCLUSIVE),
MDL_BIT(MDL_EXCLUSIVE),
0
};
/**
Check if request for the metadata lock can be satisfied given its
current state.
Bug#13058122 - DML, LOCK/UNLOCK TABLES AND SELECT LEAD TO FOREVER MDL LOCK Analysis: ---------- While granting MDL lock for the lock requests in wait queue, first the lock is granted to the high priority lock types and then to the low priority lock types. MDL Priority Matrix, +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+ | Locks | | | | | | | | has Priority| | | | | | | | over ---> | S | SR| SW| SU| SNW| SNRW| +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+ | X | + | + | + | + | + | + | +-------------|----|---|---|---|----|-----| | SNRW | - | + | + | - | - | - | +-------------|----|---|---|---|----|-----| | SNW | - | - | + | - | - | - | +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+ Here '+' means, Lock priority is higher. '-' means, Has same priority In the scenario where, *. Lock wait queue has requests of type S/SR/SW/SU. *. And locks of high priority X/SNRW/SNW are requested continuously. In this case, while granting lock, always first high priority lock requests(X/SNRW/SNW) are considered. Low priority locks(S/SR/SW/SU) will not get chance and they will wait forever. In the scenario for which this bug is reported, application executed many LOCK TABLES ... WRITE statements concurrently. These statements request SNRW lock. Also there were some connections trying to execute DML statements requesting SR lock. Since SNRW lock request has higher priority (and as they were too many waiting SNRW requests) lock is always granted to it. So, lock request SR will wait forever, resulting in DML starvation. How is this handled in 5.1? --------------------------- Even in 5.1 we have low priority lock starvation issue. But, in 5.1 thread locking, system variable "max_write_lock_count" can be configured to grant some pending read lock requests. After "max_write_lock_count" of write lock grants all the low priority locks are granted. Why this issue is seen in 5.5/trunk? --------------------------------- In 5.5/trunk MDL locking, "max_write_lock_count" system variable exists but not used in MDL, only thread lock uses it. So no effect of "max_write_lock_count" in MDL locking. This means that starvation of metadata locks is possible even if max_write_lock_count is used. Looks like, customer was using "max_write_lock_count" in 5.1 and when upgraded to 5.5, starvation is seen because of not having effect of "max_write_lock_count" in MDL. Fix: ---------- As a fix, support for max_write_lock_count is added to MDL. To maintain write lock counter per MDL_lock object, new member "m_hog_lock_count" is added in MDL_lock. And following logic is added to increment the counter in function reschedule_waiters, (reschedule_waiters function is called while thread is releasing the lock) - After granting lock request from the wait queue. - Check if there are any S/SR/SU/SW exists in the wait queue - If yes then increment the "m_hog_lock_count" And following logic is added in the same function to handle pending S/SU/SR/SW locks - Before granting locks - Check if max_write_lock_count <= m_hog_lock_count - If Yes, then try to grant S/SR/SW/SU locks. (Since all of these has same priority, all locks are granted together. But some lock grant may fail because of grant incompatibility) - Reset m_hog_lock_count if there no low priority lock requests in wait queue. - return Note: -------------------------- In the lock priority matrix explained above, though X has priority over the SNW and SNRW. X locks is taken mostly for RENAME, TRUNCATE, CREATE ... operations. So lock type X may not be requested in loop continuously in real world applications, as compared to other lock request types. So, lock request of type SNW and SNRW are not starved. So, we can grant all S/SR/SU/SW in one shot, without considering SNW & SNRW lock request starvation. ALTER table operations take SU lock first and then upgrade to SNW if required. All S, SR, SW, SU have same lock priority. So while granting SU, request of types SR, SW, S are also granted in one shot. So, lock request of type SU->SNW in loop will not make other low priority lock request to starve. But, when there is request for lock of type SNRW, lock requests of lower priority types are not granted. And if SNRW is requested in loop continuously then all S, SR, SW, SU are starved. This patch addresses the latter scenario. When we have S/SR/SW/SU in wait queue and if there are - Continuous SNRW lock requests - OR one or more X and Continuous SNRW lock requests. - OR one SNW and Continuous SNRW lock requests. - OR one SNW, one or more X and continuous SNRW lock requests. in wait queue then, S/SR/SW/SU lock request are starved.
2012-08-07 11:48:36 +05:30
@param type_arg The requested lock type.
@param requestor_ctx The MDL context of the requestor.
@param ignore_lock_priority Ignore lock priority.
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
@retval TRUE Lock request can be satisfied
@retval FALSE There is some conflicting lock.
@note In cases then current context already has "stronger" type
of lock on the object it will be automatically granted
thanks to usage of the MDL_context::find_ticket() method.
*/
bool
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
MDL_lock::can_grant_lock(enum_mdl_type type_arg,
Bug#13058122 - DML, LOCK/UNLOCK TABLES AND SELECT LEAD TO FOREVER MDL LOCK Analysis: ---------- While granting MDL lock for the lock requests in wait queue, first the lock is granted to the high priority lock types and then to the low priority lock types. MDL Priority Matrix, +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+ | Locks | | | | | | | | has Priority| | | | | | | | over ---> | S | SR| SW| SU| SNW| SNRW| +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+ | X | + | + | + | + | + | + | +-------------|----|---|---|---|----|-----| | SNRW | - | + | + | - | - | - | +-------------|----|---|---|---|----|-----| | SNW | - | - | + | - | - | - | +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+ Here '+' means, Lock priority is higher. '-' means, Has same priority In the scenario where, *. Lock wait queue has requests of type S/SR/SW/SU. *. And locks of high priority X/SNRW/SNW are requested continuously. In this case, while granting lock, always first high priority lock requests(X/SNRW/SNW) are considered. Low priority locks(S/SR/SW/SU) will not get chance and they will wait forever. In the scenario for which this bug is reported, application executed many LOCK TABLES ... WRITE statements concurrently. These statements request SNRW lock. Also there were some connections trying to execute DML statements requesting SR lock. Since SNRW lock request has higher priority (and as they were too many waiting SNRW requests) lock is always granted to it. So, lock request SR will wait forever, resulting in DML starvation. How is this handled in 5.1? --------------------------- Even in 5.1 we have low priority lock starvation issue. But, in 5.1 thread locking, system variable "max_write_lock_count" can be configured to grant some pending read lock requests. After "max_write_lock_count" of write lock grants all the low priority locks are granted. Why this issue is seen in 5.5/trunk? --------------------------------- In 5.5/trunk MDL locking, "max_write_lock_count" system variable exists but not used in MDL, only thread lock uses it. So no effect of "max_write_lock_count" in MDL locking. This means that starvation of metadata locks is possible even if max_write_lock_count is used. Looks like, customer was using "max_write_lock_count" in 5.1 and when upgraded to 5.5, starvation is seen because of not having effect of "max_write_lock_count" in MDL. Fix: ---------- As a fix, support for max_write_lock_count is added to MDL. To maintain write lock counter per MDL_lock object, new member "m_hog_lock_count" is added in MDL_lock. And following logic is added to increment the counter in function reschedule_waiters, (reschedule_waiters function is called while thread is releasing the lock) - After granting lock request from the wait queue. - Check if there are any S/SR/SU/SW exists in the wait queue - If yes then increment the "m_hog_lock_count" And following logic is added in the same function to handle pending S/SU/SR/SW locks - Before granting locks - Check if max_write_lock_count <= m_hog_lock_count - If Yes, then try to grant S/SR/SW/SU locks. (Since all of these has same priority, all locks are granted together. But some lock grant may fail because of grant incompatibility) - Reset m_hog_lock_count if there no low priority lock requests in wait queue. - return Note: -------------------------- In the lock priority matrix explained above, though X has priority over the SNW and SNRW. X locks is taken mostly for RENAME, TRUNCATE, CREATE ... operations. So lock type X may not be requested in loop continuously in real world applications, as compared to other lock request types. So, lock request of type SNW and SNRW are not starved. So, we can grant all S/SR/SU/SW in one shot, without considering SNW & SNRW lock request starvation. ALTER table operations take SU lock first and then upgrade to SNW if required. All S, SR, SW, SU have same lock priority. So while granting SU, request of types SR, SW, S are also granted in one shot. So, lock request of type SU->SNW in loop will not make other low priority lock request to starve. But, when there is request for lock of type SNRW, lock requests of lower priority types are not granted. And if SNRW is requested in loop continuously then all S, SR, SW, SU are starved. This patch addresses the latter scenario. When we have S/SR/SW/SU in wait queue and if there are - Continuous SNRW lock requests - OR one or more X and Continuous SNRW lock requests. - OR one SNW and Continuous SNRW lock requests. - OR one SNW, one or more X and continuous SNRW lock requests. in wait queue then, S/SR/SW/SU lock request are starved.
2012-08-07 11:48:36 +05:30
MDL_context *requestor_ctx,
bool ignore_lock_priority) const
{
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
bool can_grant= FALSE;
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
bitmap_t waiting_incompat_map= incompatible_waiting_types_bitmap()[type_arg];
bitmap_t granted_incompat_map= incompatible_granted_types_bitmap()[type_arg];
Bug#13058122 - DML, LOCK/UNLOCK TABLES AND SELECT LEAD TO FOREVER MDL LOCK Analysis: ---------- While granting MDL lock for the lock requests in wait queue, first the lock is granted to the high priority lock types and then to the low priority lock types. MDL Priority Matrix, +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+ | Locks | | | | | | | | has Priority| | | | | | | | over ---> | S | SR| SW| SU| SNW| SNRW| +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+ | X | + | + | + | + | + | + | +-------------|----|---|---|---|----|-----| | SNRW | - | + | + | - | - | - | +-------------|----|---|---|---|----|-----| | SNW | - | - | + | - | - | - | +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+ Here '+' means, Lock priority is higher. '-' means, Has same priority In the scenario where, *. Lock wait queue has requests of type S/SR/SW/SU. *. And locks of high priority X/SNRW/SNW are requested continuously. In this case, while granting lock, always first high priority lock requests(X/SNRW/SNW) are considered. Low priority locks(S/SR/SW/SU) will not get chance and they will wait forever. In the scenario for which this bug is reported, application executed many LOCK TABLES ... WRITE statements concurrently. These statements request SNRW lock. Also there were some connections trying to execute DML statements requesting SR lock. Since SNRW lock request has higher priority (and as they were too many waiting SNRW requests) lock is always granted to it. So, lock request SR will wait forever, resulting in DML starvation. How is this handled in 5.1? --------------------------- Even in 5.1 we have low priority lock starvation issue. But, in 5.1 thread locking, system variable "max_write_lock_count" can be configured to grant some pending read lock requests. After "max_write_lock_count" of write lock grants all the low priority locks are granted. Why this issue is seen in 5.5/trunk? --------------------------------- In 5.5/trunk MDL locking, "max_write_lock_count" system variable exists but not used in MDL, only thread lock uses it. So no effect of "max_write_lock_count" in MDL locking. This means that starvation of metadata locks is possible even if max_write_lock_count is used. Looks like, customer was using "max_write_lock_count" in 5.1 and when upgraded to 5.5, starvation is seen because of not having effect of "max_write_lock_count" in MDL. Fix: ---------- As a fix, support for max_write_lock_count is added to MDL. To maintain write lock counter per MDL_lock object, new member "m_hog_lock_count" is added in MDL_lock. And following logic is added to increment the counter in function reschedule_waiters, (reschedule_waiters function is called while thread is releasing the lock) - After granting lock request from the wait queue. - Check if there are any S/SR/SU/SW exists in the wait queue - If yes then increment the "m_hog_lock_count" And following logic is added in the same function to handle pending S/SU/SR/SW locks - Before granting locks - Check if max_write_lock_count <= m_hog_lock_count - If Yes, then try to grant S/SR/SW/SU locks. (Since all of these has same priority, all locks are granted together. But some lock grant may fail because of grant incompatibility) - Reset m_hog_lock_count if there no low priority lock requests in wait queue. - return Note: -------------------------- In the lock priority matrix explained above, though X has priority over the SNW and SNRW. X locks is taken mostly for RENAME, TRUNCATE, CREATE ... operations. So lock type X may not be requested in loop continuously in real world applications, as compared to other lock request types. So, lock request of type SNW and SNRW are not starved. So, we can grant all S/SR/SU/SW in one shot, without considering SNW & SNRW lock request starvation. ALTER table operations take SU lock first and then upgrade to SNW if required. All S, SR, SW, SU have same lock priority. So while granting SU, request of types SR, SW, S are also granted in one shot. So, lock request of type SU->SNW in loop will not make other low priority lock request to starve. But, when there is request for lock of type SNRW, lock requests of lower priority types are not granted. And if SNRW is requested in loop continuously then all S, SR, SW, SU are starved. This patch addresses the latter scenario. When we have S/SR/SW/SU in wait queue and if there are - Continuous SNRW lock requests - OR one or more X and Continuous SNRW lock requests. - OR one SNW and Continuous SNRW lock requests. - OR one SNW, one or more X and continuous SNRW lock requests. in wait queue then, S/SR/SW/SU lock request are starved.
2012-08-07 11:48:36 +05:30
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
/*
New lock request can be satisfied iff:
- There are no incompatible types of satisfied requests
in other contexts
- There are no waiting requests which have higher priority
Bug#13058122 - DML, LOCK/UNLOCK TABLES AND SELECT LEAD TO FOREVER MDL LOCK Analysis: ---------- While granting MDL lock for the lock requests in wait queue, first the lock is granted to the high priority lock types and then to the low priority lock types. MDL Priority Matrix, +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+ | Locks | | | | | | | | has Priority| | | | | | | | over ---> | S | SR| SW| SU| SNW| SNRW| +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+ | X | + | + | + | + | + | + | +-------------|----|---|---|---|----|-----| | SNRW | - | + | + | - | - | - | +-------------|----|---|---|---|----|-----| | SNW | - | - | + | - | - | - | +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+ Here '+' means, Lock priority is higher. '-' means, Has same priority In the scenario where, *. Lock wait queue has requests of type S/SR/SW/SU. *. And locks of high priority X/SNRW/SNW are requested continuously. In this case, while granting lock, always first high priority lock requests(X/SNRW/SNW) are considered. Low priority locks(S/SR/SW/SU) will not get chance and they will wait forever. In the scenario for which this bug is reported, application executed many LOCK TABLES ... WRITE statements concurrently. These statements request SNRW lock. Also there were some connections trying to execute DML statements requesting SR lock. Since SNRW lock request has higher priority (and as they were too many waiting SNRW requests) lock is always granted to it. So, lock request SR will wait forever, resulting in DML starvation. How is this handled in 5.1? --------------------------- Even in 5.1 we have low priority lock starvation issue. But, in 5.1 thread locking, system variable "max_write_lock_count" can be configured to grant some pending read lock requests. After "max_write_lock_count" of write lock grants all the low priority locks are granted. Why this issue is seen in 5.5/trunk? --------------------------------- In 5.5/trunk MDL locking, "max_write_lock_count" system variable exists but not used in MDL, only thread lock uses it. So no effect of "max_write_lock_count" in MDL locking. This means that starvation of metadata locks is possible even if max_write_lock_count is used. Looks like, customer was using "max_write_lock_count" in 5.1 and when upgraded to 5.5, starvation is seen because of not having effect of "max_write_lock_count" in MDL. Fix: ---------- As a fix, support for max_write_lock_count is added to MDL. To maintain write lock counter per MDL_lock object, new member "m_hog_lock_count" is added in MDL_lock. And following logic is added to increment the counter in function reschedule_waiters, (reschedule_waiters function is called while thread is releasing the lock) - After granting lock request from the wait queue. - Check if there are any S/SR/SU/SW exists in the wait queue - If yes then increment the "m_hog_lock_count" And following logic is added in the same function to handle pending S/SU/SR/SW locks - Before granting locks - Check if max_write_lock_count <= m_hog_lock_count - If Yes, then try to grant S/SR/SW/SU locks. (Since all of these has same priority, all locks are granted together. But some lock grant may fail because of grant incompatibility) - Reset m_hog_lock_count if there no low priority lock requests in wait queue. - return Note: -------------------------- In the lock priority matrix explained above, though X has priority over the SNW and SNRW. X locks is taken mostly for RENAME, TRUNCATE, CREATE ... operations. So lock type X may not be requested in loop continuously in real world applications, as compared to other lock request types. So, lock request of type SNW and SNRW are not starved. So, we can grant all S/SR/SU/SW in one shot, without considering SNW & SNRW lock request starvation. ALTER table operations take SU lock first and then upgrade to SNW if required. All S, SR, SW, SU have same lock priority. So while granting SU, request of types SR, SW, S are also granted in one shot. So, lock request of type SU->SNW in loop will not make other low priority lock request to starve. But, when there is request for lock of type SNRW, lock requests of lower priority types are not granted. And if SNRW is requested in loop continuously then all S, SR, SW, SU are starved. This patch addresses the latter scenario. When we have S/SR/SW/SU in wait queue and if there are - Continuous SNRW lock requests - OR one or more X and Continuous SNRW lock requests. - OR one SNW and Continuous SNRW lock requests. - OR one SNW, one or more X and continuous SNRW lock requests. in wait queue then, S/SR/SW/SU lock request are starved.
2012-08-07 11:48:36 +05:30
than this request when priority was not ignored.
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
*/
Bug#13058122 - DML, LOCK/UNLOCK TABLES AND SELECT LEAD TO FOREVER MDL LOCK Analysis: ---------- While granting MDL lock for the lock requests in wait queue, first the lock is granted to the high priority lock types and then to the low priority lock types. MDL Priority Matrix, +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+ | Locks | | | | | | | | has Priority| | | | | | | | over ---> | S | SR| SW| SU| SNW| SNRW| +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+ | X | + | + | + | + | + | + | +-------------|----|---|---|---|----|-----| | SNRW | - | + | + | - | - | - | +-------------|----|---|---|---|----|-----| | SNW | - | - | + | - | - | - | +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+ Here '+' means, Lock priority is higher. '-' means, Has same priority In the scenario where, *. Lock wait queue has requests of type S/SR/SW/SU. *. And locks of high priority X/SNRW/SNW are requested continuously. In this case, while granting lock, always first high priority lock requests(X/SNRW/SNW) are considered. Low priority locks(S/SR/SW/SU) will not get chance and they will wait forever. In the scenario for which this bug is reported, application executed many LOCK TABLES ... WRITE statements concurrently. These statements request SNRW lock. Also there were some connections trying to execute DML statements requesting SR lock. Since SNRW lock request has higher priority (and as they were too many waiting SNRW requests) lock is always granted to it. So, lock request SR will wait forever, resulting in DML starvation. How is this handled in 5.1? --------------------------- Even in 5.1 we have low priority lock starvation issue. But, in 5.1 thread locking, system variable "max_write_lock_count" can be configured to grant some pending read lock requests. After "max_write_lock_count" of write lock grants all the low priority locks are granted. Why this issue is seen in 5.5/trunk? --------------------------------- In 5.5/trunk MDL locking, "max_write_lock_count" system variable exists but not used in MDL, only thread lock uses it. So no effect of "max_write_lock_count" in MDL locking. This means that starvation of metadata locks is possible even if max_write_lock_count is used. Looks like, customer was using "max_write_lock_count" in 5.1 and when upgraded to 5.5, starvation is seen because of not having effect of "max_write_lock_count" in MDL. Fix: ---------- As a fix, support for max_write_lock_count is added to MDL. To maintain write lock counter per MDL_lock object, new member "m_hog_lock_count" is added in MDL_lock. And following logic is added to increment the counter in function reschedule_waiters, (reschedule_waiters function is called while thread is releasing the lock) - After granting lock request from the wait queue. - Check if there are any S/SR/SU/SW exists in the wait queue - If yes then increment the "m_hog_lock_count" And following logic is added in the same function to handle pending S/SU/SR/SW locks - Before granting locks - Check if max_write_lock_count <= m_hog_lock_count - If Yes, then try to grant S/SR/SW/SU locks. (Since all of these has same priority, all locks are granted together. But some lock grant may fail because of grant incompatibility) - Reset m_hog_lock_count if there no low priority lock requests in wait queue. - return Note: -------------------------- In the lock priority matrix explained above, though X has priority over the SNW and SNRW. X locks is taken mostly for RENAME, TRUNCATE, CREATE ... operations. So lock type X may not be requested in loop continuously in real world applications, as compared to other lock request types. So, lock request of type SNW and SNRW are not starved. So, we can grant all S/SR/SU/SW in one shot, without considering SNW & SNRW lock request starvation. ALTER table operations take SU lock first and then upgrade to SNW if required. All S, SR, SW, SU have same lock priority. So while granting SU, request of types SR, SW, S are also granted in one shot. So, lock request of type SU->SNW in loop will not make other low priority lock request to starve. But, when there is request for lock of type SNRW, lock requests of lower priority types are not granted. And if SNRW is requested in loop continuously then all S, SR, SW, SU are starved. This patch addresses the latter scenario. When we have S/SR/SW/SU in wait queue and if there are - Continuous SNRW lock requests - OR one or more X and Continuous SNRW lock requests. - OR one SNW and Continuous SNRW lock requests. - OR one SNW, one or more X and continuous SNRW lock requests. in wait queue then, S/SR/SW/SU lock request are starved.
2012-08-07 11:48:36 +05:30
if (ignore_lock_priority || !(m_waiting.bitmap() & waiting_incompat_map))
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
{
if (! (m_granted.bitmap() & granted_incompat_map))
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
can_grant= TRUE;
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
else
{
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
Ticket_iterator it(m_granted);
MDL_ticket *ticket;
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
/* Check that the incompatible lock belongs to some other context. */
while ((ticket= it++))
{
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
if (ticket->get_ctx() != requestor_ctx &&
ticket->is_incompatible_when_granted(type_arg))
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
break;
}
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
if (ticket == NULL) /* Incompatible locks are our own. */
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
can_grant= TRUE;
}
}
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
return can_grant;
}
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
/** Remove a ticket from waiting or pending queue and wakeup up waiters. */
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
void MDL_lock::remove_ticket(Ticket_list MDL_lock::*list, MDL_ticket *ticket)
{
mysql_prlock_wrlock(&m_rwlock);
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
(this->*list).remove_ticket(ticket);
if (is_empty())
mdl_locks.remove(this);
else
{
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
/*
There can be some contexts waiting to acquire a lock
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
which now might be able to do it. Grant the lock to
them and wake them up!
We always try to reschedule locks, since there is no easy way
(i.e. by looking at the bitmaps) to find out whether it is
required or not.
In a general case, even when the queue's bitmap is not changed
after removal of the ticket, there is a chance that some request
can be satisfied (due to the fact that a granted request
reflected in the bitmap might belong to the same context as a
pending request).
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
*/
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
reschedule_waiters();
mysql_prlock_unlock(&m_rwlock);
}
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
}
/**
Check if we have any pending locks which conflict with existing
shared lock.
@pre The ticket must match an acquired lock.
@return TRUE if there is a conflicting lock request, FALSE otherwise.
*/
bool MDL_lock::has_pending_conflicting_lock(enum_mdl_type type)
{
bool result;
2010-02-02 02:22:16 +03:00
mysql_mutex_assert_not_owner(&LOCK_open);
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
mysql_prlock_rdlock(&m_rwlock);
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
result= (m_waiting.bitmap() & incompatible_granted_types_bitmap()[type]);
mysql_prlock_unlock(&m_rwlock);
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
return result;
}
MDL_wait_for_graph_visitor::~MDL_wait_for_graph_visitor()
{
}
MDL_wait_for_subgraph::~MDL_wait_for_subgraph()
{
}
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
/**
Check if ticket represents metadata lock of "stronger" or equal type
than specified one. I.e. if metadata lock represented by ticket won't
allow any of locks which are not allowed by specified type of lock.
@return TRUE if ticket has stronger or equal type
FALSE otherwise.
*/
bool MDL_ticket::has_stronger_or_equal_type(enum_mdl_type type) const
{
const MDL_lock::bitmap_t *
granted_incompat_map= m_lock->incompatible_granted_types_bitmap();
return ! (granted_incompat_map[type] & ~(granted_incompat_map[m_type]));
}
bool MDL_ticket::is_incompatible_when_granted(enum_mdl_type type) const
{
return (MDL_BIT(m_type) &
m_lock->incompatible_granted_types_bitmap()[type]);
}
bool MDL_ticket::is_incompatible_when_waiting(enum_mdl_type type) const
{
return (MDL_BIT(m_type) &
m_lock->incompatible_waiting_types_bitmap()[type]);
}
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
/**
Check whether the context already holds a compatible lock ticket
on an object.
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
Start searching from list of locks for the same duration as lock
being requested. If not look at lists for other durations.
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
@param mdl_request Lock request object for lock to be acquired
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
@param[out] result_duration Duration of lock which was found.
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
@note Tickets which correspond to lock types "stronger" than one
being requested are also considered compatible.
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
@return A pointer to the lock ticket for the object or NULL otherwise.
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
*/
MDL_ticket *
A prerequisite patch for the fix for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". Introduce a notion of a sentinel to MDL_context. A sentinel is a ticket that separates all tickets in the context into two groups: before and after it. Currently we can have (and need) only one designated sentinel -- it separates all locks taken by LOCK TABLE or HANDLER statement, which must survive COMMIT and ROLLBACK and all other locks, which must be released at COMMIT or ROLLBACK. The tricky part is maintaining the sentinel up to date when someone release its corresponding ticket. This can happen, e.g. if someone issues DROP TABLE under LOCK TABLES (generally, see all calls to release_all_locks_for_name()). MDL_context::release_ticket() is modified to take care of it. ****** A fix and a test case for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". An attempt to mix HANDLER SQL statements, which are transaction- agnostic, an open multi-statement transaction, and DDL against the involved tables (in a concurrent connection) could lead to a deadlock. The deadlock would occur when HANDLER OPEN or HANDLER READ would have to wait on a conflicting metadata lock. If the connection that issued HANDLER statement also had other metadata locks (say, acquired in scope of a transaction), a classical deadlock situation of mutual wait could occur. Incompatible change: entering LOCK TABLES mode automatically closes all open HANDLERs in the current connection. Incompatible change: previously an attempt to wait on a lock in a connection that has an open HANDLER statement could wait indefinitely/deadlock. After this patch, an error ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK is produced. The idea of the fix is to merge thd->handler_mdl_context with the main mdl_context of the connection, used for transactional locks. This makes deadlock detection possible, since all waits with locks are "visible" and available to analysis in a single MDL context of the connection. Since HANDLER locks and transactional locks have a different life cycle -- HANDLERs are explicitly open and closed, and so are HANDLER locks, explicitly acquired and released, whereas transactional locks "accumulate" till the end of a transaction and are released only with COMMIT, ROLLBACK and ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, a concept of "sentinel" was introduced to MDL_context. All locks, HANDLER and others, reside in the same linked list. However, a selected element of the list separates locks with different life cycle. HANDLER locks always reside at the end of the list, after the sentinel. Transactional locks are prepended to the beginning of the list, before the sentinel. Thus, ROLLBACK, COMMIT or ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, only release those locks that reside before the sentinel. HANDLER locks must be released explicitly as part of HANDLER CLOSE statement, or an implicit close. The same approach with sentinel is also employed for LOCK TABLES locks. Since HANDLER and LOCK TABLES statement has never worked together, the implementation is made simple and only maintains one sentinel, which is used either for HANDLER locks, or for LOCK TABLES locks.
2009-12-22 19:09:15 +03:00
MDL_context::find_ticket(MDL_request *mdl_request,
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
enum_mdl_duration *result_duration)
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
{
MDL_ticket *ticket;
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
int i;
A prerequisite patch for the fix for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". Introduce a notion of a sentinel to MDL_context. A sentinel is a ticket that separates all tickets in the context into two groups: before and after it. Currently we can have (and need) only one designated sentinel -- it separates all locks taken by LOCK TABLE or HANDLER statement, which must survive COMMIT and ROLLBACK and all other locks, which must be released at COMMIT or ROLLBACK. The tricky part is maintaining the sentinel up to date when someone release its corresponding ticket. This can happen, e.g. if someone issues DROP TABLE under LOCK TABLES (generally, see all calls to release_all_locks_for_name()). MDL_context::release_ticket() is modified to take care of it. ****** A fix and a test case for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". An attempt to mix HANDLER SQL statements, which are transaction- agnostic, an open multi-statement transaction, and DDL against the involved tables (in a concurrent connection) could lead to a deadlock. The deadlock would occur when HANDLER OPEN or HANDLER READ would have to wait on a conflicting metadata lock. If the connection that issued HANDLER statement also had other metadata locks (say, acquired in scope of a transaction), a classical deadlock situation of mutual wait could occur. Incompatible change: entering LOCK TABLES mode automatically closes all open HANDLERs in the current connection. Incompatible change: previously an attempt to wait on a lock in a connection that has an open HANDLER statement could wait indefinitely/deadlock. After this patch, an error ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK is produced. The idea of the fix is to merge thd->handler_mdl_context with the main mdl_context of the connection, used for transactional locks. This makes deadlock detection possible, since all waits with locks are "visible" and available to analysis in a single MDL context of the connection. Since HANDLER locks and transactional locks have a different life cycle -- HANDLERs are explicitly open and closed, and so are HANDLER locks, explicitly acquired and released, whereas transactional locks "accumulate" till the end of a transaction and are released only with COMMIT, ROLLBACK and ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, a concept of "sentinel" was introduced to MDL_context. All locks, HANDLER and others, reside in the same linked list. However, a selected element of the list separates locks with different life cycle. HANDLER locks always reside at the end of the list, after the sentinel. Transactional locks are prepended to the beginning of the list, before the sentinel. Thus, ROLLBACK, COMMIT or ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, only release those locks that reside before the sentinel. HANDLER locks must be released explicitly as part of HANDLER CLOSE statement, or an implicit close. The same approach with sentinel is also employed for LOCK TABLES locks. Since HANDLER and LOCK TABLES statement has never worked together, the implementation is made simple and only maintains one sentinel, which is used either for HANDLER locks, or for LOCK TABLES locks.
2009-12-22 19:09:15 +03:00
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
for (i= 0; i < MDL_DURATION_END; i++)
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
{
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
enum_mdl_duration duration= (enum_mdl_duration)((mdl_request->duration+i) %
MDL_DURATION_END);
Ticket_iterator it(m_tickets[duration]);
A prerequisite patch for the fix for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". Introduce a notion of a sentinel to MDL_context. A sentinel is a ticket that separates all tickets in the context into two groups: before and after it. Currently we can have (and need) only one designated sentinel -- it separates all locks taken by LOCK TABLE or HANDLER statement, which must survive COMMIT and ROLLBACK and all other locks, which must be released at COMMIT or ROLLBACK. The tricky part is maintaining the sentinel up to date when someone release its corresponding ticket. This can happen, e.g. if someone issues DROP TABLE under LOCK TABLES (generally, see all calls to release_all_locks_for_name()). MDL_context::release_ticket() is modified to take care of it. ****** A fix and a test case for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". An attempt to mix HANDLER SQL statements, which are transaction- agnostic, an open multi-statement transaction, and DDL against the involved tables (in a concurrent connection) could lead to a deadlock. The deadlock would occur when HANDLER OPEN or HANDLER READ would have to wait on a conflicting metadata lock. If the connection that issued HANDLER statement also had other metadata locks (say, acquired in scope of a transaction), a classical deadlock situation of mutual wait could occur. Incompatible change: entering LOCK TABLES mode automatically closes all open HANDLERs in the current connection. Incompatible change: previously an attempt to wait on a lock in a connection that has an open HANDLER statement could wait indefinitely/deadlock. After this patch, an error ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK is produced. The idea of the fix is to merge thd->handler_mdl_context with the main mdl_context of the connection, used for transactional locks. This makes deadlock detection possible, since all waits with locks are "visible" and available to analysis in a single MDL context of the connection. Since HANDLER locks and transactional locks have a different life cycle -- HANDLERs are explicitly open and closed, and so are HANDLER locks, explicitly acquired and released, whereas transactional locks "accumulate" till the end of a transaction and are released only with COMMIT, ROLLBACK and ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, a concept of "sentinel" was introduced to MDL_context. All locks, HANDLER and others, reside in the same linked list. However, a selected element of the list separates locks with different life cycle. HANDLER locks always reside at the end of the list, after the sentinel. Transactional locks are prepended to the beginning of the list, before the sentinel. Thus, ROLLBACK, COMMIT or ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, only release those locks that reside before the sentinel. HANDLER locks must be released explicitly as part of HANDLER CLOSE statement, or an implicit close. The same approach with sentinel is also employed for LOCK TABLES locks. Since HANDLER and LOCK TABLES statement has never worked together, the implementation is made simple and only maintains one sentinel, which is used either for HANDLER locks, or for LOCK TABLES locks.
2009-12-22 19:09:15 +03:00
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
while ((ticket= it++))
{
if (mdl_request->key.is_equal(&ticket->m_lock->key) &&
ticket->has_stronger_or_equal_type(mdl_request->type))
{
*result_duration= duration;
return ticket;
}
}
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
}
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
return NULL;
}
/**
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
Try to acquire one lock.
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
Unlike exclusive locks, shared locks are acquired one by
one. This is interface is chosen to simplify introduction of
the new locking API to the system. MDL_context::try_acquire_lock()
is currently used from open_table(), and there we have only one
table to work with.
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
This function may also be used to try to acquire an exclusive
lock on a destination table, by ALTER TABLE ... RENAME.
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
Returns immediately without any side effect if encounters a lock
conflict. Otherwise takes the lock.
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
FIXME: Compared to lock_table_name_if_not_cached() (from 5.1)
it gives slightly more false negatives.
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
@param mdl_request [in/out] Lock request object for lock to be acquired
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
@retval FALSE Success. The lock may have not been acquired.
Check the ticket, if it's NULL, a conflicting lock
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
exists.
@retval TRUE Out of resources, an error has been reported.
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
*/
bool
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
MDL_context::try_acquire_lock(MDL_request *mdl_request)
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
{
MDL_ticket *ticket;
if (try_acquire_lock_impl(mdl_request, &ticket))
return TRUE;
if (! mdl_request->ticket)
{
/*
Our attempt to acquire lock without waiting has failed.
Let us release resources which were acquired in the process.
We can't get here if we allocated a new lock object so there
is no need to release it.
*/
DBUG_ASSERT(! ticket->m_lock->is_empty());
mysql_prlock_unlock(&ticket->m_lock->m_rwlock);
MDL_ticket::destroy(ticket);
}
return FALSE;
}
/**
Auxiliary method for acquiring lock without waiting.
@param mdl_request [in/out] Lock request object for lock to be acquired
@param out_ticket [out] Ticket for the request in case when lock
has not been acquired.
@retval FALSE Success. The lock may have not been acquired.
Check MDL_request::ticket, if it's NULL, a conflicting
lock exists. In this case "out_ticket" out parameter
points to ticket which was constructed for the request.
MDL_ticket::m_lock points to the corresponding MDL_lock
object and MDL_lock::m_rwlock write-locked.
@retval TRUE Out of resources, an error has been reported.
*/
bool
MDL_context::try_acquire_lock_impl(MDL_request *mdl_request,
MDL_ticket **out_ticket)
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
{
MDL_lock *lock;
MDL_key *key= &mdl_request->key;
MDL_ticket *ticket;
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
enum_mdl_duration found_duration;
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
Fix for bug #52044 "FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK and FLUSH TABLES <list> WITH READ LOCK are incompatible". The problem was that FLUSH TABLES <list> WITH READ LOCK which was issued when other connection has acquired global read lock using FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK was blocked and has to wait until global read lock is released. This issue stemmed from the fact that FLUSH TABLES <list> WITH READ LOCK implementation has acquired X metadata locks on tables to be flushed. Since these locks required acquiring of global IX lock this statement was incompatible with global read lock. This patch addresses problem by using SNW metadata type of lock for tables to be flushed by FLUSH TABLES <list> WITH READ LOCK. It is OK to acquire them without global IX lock as long as we won't try to upgrade those locks. Since SNW locks allow concurrent statements using same table FLUSH TABLE <list> WITH READ LOCK now has to wait until old versions of tables to be flushed go away after acquiring metadata locks. Since such waiting can lead to deadlock MDL deadlock detector was extended to take into account waits for flush and resolve such deadlocks. As a bonus code in open_tables() which was responsible for waiting old versions of tables to go away was refactored. Now when we encounter old version of table in open_table() we don't back-off and wait for all old version to go away, but instead wait for this particular table to be flushed. Such approach supported by deadlock detection should reduce number of scenarios in which FLUSH TABLES aborts concurrent multi-statement transactions. Note that active FLUSH TABLES <list> WITH READ LOCK still blocks concurrent FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statement as the former keeps tables open and thus prevents the latter statement from doing flush.
2010-07-27 17:34:58 +04:00
DBUG_ASSERT(mdl_request->type != MDL_EXCLUSIVE ||
is_lock_owner(MDL_key::GLOBAL, "", "", MDL_INTENTION_EXCLUSIVE));
DBUG_ASSERT(mdl_request->ticket == NULL);
/* Don't take chances in production. */
mdl_request->ticket= NULL;
2010-02-02 02:22:16 +03:00
mysql_mutex_assert_not_owner(&LOCK_open);
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
/*
Check whether the context already holds a shared lock on the object,
and if so, grant the request.
*/
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
if ((ticket= find_ticket(mdl_request, &found_duration)))
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
{
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
DBUG_ASSERT(ticket->m_lock);
DBUG_ASSERT(ticket->has_stronger_or_equal_type(mdl_request->type));
A prerequisite patch for the fix for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". Introduce a notion of a sentinel to MDL_context. A sentinel is a ticket that separates all tickets in the context into two groups: before and after it. Currently we can have (and need) only one designated sentinel -- it separates all locks taken by LOCK TABLE or HANDLER statement, which must survive COMMIT and ROLLBACK and all other locks, which must be released at COMMIT or ROLLBACK. The tricky part is maintaining the sentinel up to date when someone release its corresponding ticket. This can happen, e.g. if someone issues DROP TABLE under LOCK TABLES (generally, see all calls to release_all_locks_for_name()). MDL_context::release_ticket() is modified to take care of it. ****** A fix and a test case for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". An attempt to mix HANDLER SQL statements, which are transaction- agnostic, an open multi-statement transaction, and DDL against the involved tables (in a concurrent connection) could lead to a deadlock. The deadlock would occur when HANDLER OPEN or HANDLER READ would have to wait on a conflicting metadata lock. If the connection that issued HANDLER statement also had other metadata locks (say, acquired in scope of a transaction), a classical deadlock situation of mutual wait could occur. Incompatible change: entering LOCK TABLES mode automatically closes all open HANDLERs in the current connection. Incompatible change: previously an attempt to wait on a lock in a connection that has an open HANDLER statement could wait indefinitely/deadlock. After this patch, an error ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK is produced. The idea of the fix is to merge thd->handler_mdl_context with the main mdl_context of the connection, used for transactional locks. This makes deadlock detection possible, since all waits with locks are "visible" and available to analysis in a single MDL context of the connection. Since HANDLER locks and transactional locks have a different life cycle -- HANDLERs are explicitly open and closed, and so are HANDLER locks, explicitly acquired and released, whereas transactional locks "accumulate" till the end of a transaction and are released only with COMMIT, ROLLBACK and ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, a concept of "sentinel" was introduced to MDL_context. All locks, HANDLER and others, reside in the same linked list. However, a selected element of the list separates locks with different life cycle. HANDLER locks always reside at the end of the list, after the sentinel. Transactional locks are prepended to the beginning of the list, before the sentinel. Thus, ROLLBACK, COMMIT or ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, only release those locks that reside before the sentinel. HANDLER locks must be released explicitly as part of HANDLER CLOSE statement, or an implicit close. The same approach with sentinel is also employed for LOCK TABLES locks. Since HANDLER and LOCK TABLES statement has never worked together, the implementation is made simple and only maintains one sentinel, which is used either for HANDLER locks, or for LOCK TABLES locks.
2009-12-22 19:09:15 +03:00
/*
If the request is for a transactional lock, and we found
a transactional lock, just reuse the found ticket.
It's possible that we found a transactional lock,
but the request is for a HANDLER lock. In that case HANDLER
code will clone the ticket (see below why it's needed).
If the request is for a transactional lock, and we found
a HANDLER lock, create a copy, to make sure that when user
does HANDLER CLOSE, the transactional lock is not released.
If the request is for a handler lock, and we found a
HANDLER lock, also do the clone. HANDLER CLOSE for one alias
should not release the lock on the table HANDLER opened through
a different alias.
*/
mdl_request->ticket= ticket;
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
if ((found_duration != mdl_request->duration ||
mdl_request->duration == MDL_EXPLICIT) &&
clone_ticket(mdl_request))
A prerequisite patch for the fix for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". Introduce a notion of a sentinel to MDL_context. A sentinel is a ticket that separates all tickets in the context into two groups: before and after it. Currently we can have (and need) only one designated sentinel -- it separates all locks taken by LOCK TABLE or HANDLER statement, which must survive COMMIT and ROLLBACK and all other locks, which must be released at COMMIT or ROLLBACK. The tricky part is maintaining the sentinel up to date when someone release its corresponding ticket. This can happen, e.g. if someone issues DROP TABLE under LOCK TABLES (generally, see all calls to release_all_locks_for_name()). MDL_context::release_ticket() is modified to take care of it. ****** A fix and a test case for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". An attempt to mix HANDLER SQL statements, which are transaction- agnostic, an open multi-statement transaction, and DDL against the involved tables (in a concurrent connection) could lead to a deadlock. The deadlock would occur when HANDLER OPEN or HANDLER READ would have to wait on a conflicting metadata lock. If the connection that issued HANDLER statement also had other metadata locks (say, acquired in scope of a transaction), a classical deadlock situation of mutual wait could occur. Incompatible change: entering LOCK TABLES mode automatically closes all open HANDLERs in the current connection. Incompatible change: previously an attempt to wait on a lock in a connection that has an open HANDLER statement could wait indefinitely/deadlock. After this patch, an error ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK is produced. The idea of the fix is to merge thd->handler_mdl_context with the main mdl_context of the connection, used for transactional locks. This makes deadlock detection possible, since all waits with locks are "visible" and available to analysis in a single MDL context of the connection. Since HANDLER locks and transactional locks have a different life cycle -- HANDLERs are explicitly open and closed, and so are HANDLER locks, explicitly acquired and released, whereas transactional locks "accumulate" till the end of a transaction and are released only with COMMIT, ROLLBACK and ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, a concept of "sentinel" was introduced to MDL_context. All locks, HANDLER and others, reside in the same linked list. However, a selected element of the list separates locks with different life cycle. HANDLER locks always reside at the end of the list, after the sentinel. Transactional locks are prepended to the beginning of the list, before the sentinel. Thus, ROLLBACK, COMMIT or ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, only release those locks that reside before the sentinel. HANDLER locks must be released explicitly as part of HANDLER CLOSE statement, or an implicit close. The same approach with sentinel is also employed for LOCK TABLES locks. Since HANDLER and LOCK TABLES statement has never worked together, the implementation is made simple and only maintains one sentinel, which is used either for HANDLER locks, or for LOCK TABLES locks.
2009-12-22 19:09:15 +03:00
{
/* Clone failed. */
mdl_request->ticket= NULL;
return TRUE;
}
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
return FALSE;
}
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
if (!(ticket= MDL_ticket::create(this, mdl_request->type
#ifndef DBUG_OFF
, mdl_request->duration
#endif
)))
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
return TRUE;
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
/* The below call implicitly locks MDL_lock::m_rwlock on success. */
if (!(lock= mdl_locks.find_or_insert(key)))
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
{
MDL_ticket::destroy(ticket);
return TRUE;
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
}
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
ticket->m_lock= lock;
Bug#13058122 - DML, LOCK/UNLOCK TABLES AND SELECT LEAD TO FOREVER MDL LOCK Analysis: ---------- While granting MDL lock for the lock requests in wait queue, first the lock is granted to the high priority lock types and then to the low priority lock types. MDL Priority Matrix, +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+ | Locks | | | | | | | | has Priority| | | | | | | | over ---> | S | SR| SW| SU| SNW| SNRW| +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+ | X | + | + | + | + | + | + | +-------------|----|---|---|---|----|-----| | SNRW | - | + | + | - | - | - | +-------------|----|---|---|---|----|-----| | SNW | - | - | + | - | - | - | +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+ Here '+' means, Lock priority is higher. '-' means, Has same priority In the scenario where, *. Lock wait queue has requests of type S/SR/SW/SU. *. And locks of high priority X/SNRW/SNW are requested continuously. In this case, while granting lock, always first high priority lock requests(X/SNRW/SNW) are considered. Low priority locks(S/SR/SW/SU) will not get chance and they will wait forever. In the scenario for which this bug is reported, application executed many LOCK TABLES ... WRITE statements concurrently. These statements request SNRW lock. Also there were some connections trying to execute DML statements requesting SR lock. Since SNRW lock request has higher priority (and as they were too many waiting SNRW requests) lock is always granted to it. So, lock request SR will wait forever, resulting in DML starvation. How is this handled in 5.1? --------------------------- Even in 5.1 we have low priority lock starvation issue. But, in 5.1 thread locking, system variable "max_write_lock_count" can be configured to grant some pending read lock requests. After "max_write_lock_count" of write lock grants all the low priority locks are granted. Why this issue is seen in 5.5/trunk? --------------------------------- In 5.5/trunk MDL locking, "max_write_lock_count" system variable exists but not used in MDL, only thread lock uses it. So no effect of "max_write_lock_count" in MDL locking. This means that starvation of metadata locks is possible even if max_write_lock_count is used. Looks like, customer was using "max_write_lock_count" in 5.1 and when upgraded to 5.5, starvation is seen because of not having effect of "max_write_lock_count" in MDL. Fix: ---------- As a fix, support for max_write_lock_count is added to MDL. To maintain write lock counter per MDL_lock object, new member "m_hog_lock_count" is added in MDL_lock. And following logic is added to increment the counter in function reschedule_waiters, (reschedule_waiters function is called while thread is releasing the lock) - After granting lock request from the wait queue. - Check if there are any S/SR/SU/SW exists in the wait queue - If yes then increment the "m_hog_lock_count" And following logic is added in the same function to handle pending S/SU/SR/SW locks - Before granting locks - Check if max_write_lock_count <= m_hog_lock_count - If Yes, then try to grant S/SR/SW/SU locks. (Since all of these has same priority, all locks are granted together. But some lock grant may fail because of grant incompatibility) - Reset m_hog_lock_count if there no low priority lock requests in wait queue. - return Note: -------------------------- In the lock priority matrix explained above, though X has priority over the SNW and SNRW. X locks is taken mostly for RENAME, TRUNCATE, CREATE ... operations. So lock type X may not be requested in loop continuously in real world applications, as compared to other lock request types. So, lock request of type SNW and SNRW are not starved. So, we can grant all S/SR/SU/SW in one shot, without considering SNW & SNRW lock request starvation. ALTER table operations take SU lock first and then upgrade to SNW if required. All S, SR, SW, SU have same lock priority. So while granting SU, request of types SR, SW, S are also granted in one shot. So, lock request of type SU->SNW in loop will not make other low priority lock request to starve. But, when there is request for lock of type SNRW, lock requests of lower priority types are not granted. And if SNRW is requested in loop continuously then all S, SR, SW, SU are starved. This patch addresses the latter scenario. When we have S/SR/SW/SU in wait queue and if there are - Continuous SNRW lock requests - OR one or more X and Continuous SNRW lock requests. - OR one SNW and Continuous SNRW lock requests. - OR one SNW, one or more X and continuous SNRW lock requests. in wait queue then, S/SR/SW/SU lock request are starved.
2012-08-07 11:48:36 +05:30
if (lock->can_grant_lock(mdl_request->type, this, false))
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
{
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
lock->m_granted.add_ticket(ticket);
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
mysql_prlock_unlock(&lock->m_rwlock);
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
m_tickets[mdl_request->duration].push_front(ticket);
mdl_request->ticket= ticket;
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
}
else
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
*out_ticket= ticket;
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
return FALSE;
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
}
/**
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
Create a copy of a granted ticket.
A prerequisite patch for the fix for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". Introduce a notion of a sentinel to MDL_context. A sentinel is a ticket that separates all tickets in the context into two groups: before and after it. Currently we can have (and need) only one designated sentinel -- it separates all locks taken by LOCK TABLE or HANDLER statement, which must survive COMMIT and ROLLBACK and all other locks, which must be released at COMMIT or ROLLBACK. The tricky part is maintaining the sentinel up to date when someone release its corresponding ticket. This can happen, e.g. if someone issues DROP TABLE under LOCK TABLES (generally, see all calls to release_all_locks_for_name()). MDL_context::release_ticket() is modified to take care of it. ****** A fix and a test case for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". An attempt to mix HANDLER SQL statements, which are transaction- agnostic, an open multi-statement transaction, and DDL against the involved tables (in a concurrent connection) could lead to a deadlock. The deadlock would occur when HANDLER OPEN or HANDLER READ would have to wait on a conflicting metadata lock. If the connection that issued HANDLER statement also had other metadata locks (say, acquired in scope of a transaction), a classical deadlock situation of mutual wait could occur. Incompatible change: entering LOCK TABLES mode automatically closes all open HANDLERs in the current connection. Incompatible change: previously an attempt to wait on a lock in a connection that has an open HANDLER statement could wait indefinitely/deadlock. After this patch, an error ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK is produced. The idea of the fix is to merge thd->handler_mdl_context with the main mdl_context of the connection, used for transactional locks. This makes deadlock detection possible, since all waits with locks are "visible" and available to analysis in a single MDL context of the connection. Since HANDLER locks and transactional locks have a different life cycle -- HANDLERs are explicitly open and closed, and so are HANDLER locks, explicitly acquired and released, whereas transactional locks "accumulate" till the end of a transaction and are released only with COMMIT, ROLLBACK and ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, a concept of "sentinel" was introduced to MDL_context. All locks, HANDLER and others, reside in the same linked list. However, a selected element of the list separates locks with different life cycle. HANDLER locks always reside at the end of the list, after the sentinel. Transactional locks are prepended to the beginning of the list, before the sentinel. Thus, ROLLBACK, COMMIT or ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, only release those locks that reside before the sentinel. HANDLER locks must be released explicitly as part of HANDLER CLOSE statement, or an implicit close. The same approach with sentinel is also employed for LOCK TABLES locks. Since HANDLER and LOCK TABLES statement has never worked together, the implementation is made simple and only maintains one sentinel, which is used either for HANDLER locks, or for LOCK TABLES locks.
2009-12-22 19:09:15 +03:00
This is used to make sure that HANDLER ticket
is never shared with a ticket that belongs to
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
a transaction, so that when we HANDLER CLOSE,
A prerequisite patch for the fix for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". Introduce a notion of a sentinel to MDL_context. A sentinel is a ticket that separates all tickets in the context into two groups: before and after it. Currently we can have (and need) only one designated sentinel -- it separates all locks taken by LOCK TABLE or HANDLER statement, which must survive COMMIT and ROLLBACK and all other locks, which must be released at COMMIT or ROLLBACK. The tricky part is maintaining the sentinel up to date when someone release its corresponding ticket. This can happen, e.g. if someone issues DROP TABLE under LOCK TABLES (generally, see all calls to release_all_locks_for_name()). MDL_context::release_ticket() is modified to take care of it. ****** A fix and a test case for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". An attempt to mix HANDLER SQL statements, which are transaction- agnostic, an open multi-statement transaction, and DDL against the involved tables (in a concurrent connection) could lead to a deadlock. The deadlock would occur when HANDLER OPEN or HANDLER READ would have to wait on a conflicting metadata lock. If the connection that issued HANDLER statement also had other metadata locks (say, acquired in scope of a transaction), a classical deadlock situation of mutual wait could occur. Incompatible change: entering LOCK TABLES mode automatically closes all open HANDLERs in the current connection. Incompatible change: previously an attempt to wait on a lock in a connection that has an open HANDLER statement could wait indefinitely/deadlock. After this patch, an error ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK is produced. The idea of the fix is to merge thd->handler_mdl_context with the main mdl_context of the connection, used for transactional locks. This makes deadlock detection possible, since all waits with locks are "visible" and available to analysis in a single MDL context of the connection. Since HANDLER locks and transactional locks have a different life cycle -- HANDLERs are explicitly open and closed, and so are HANDLER locks, explicitly acquired and released, whereas transactional locks "accumulate" till the end of a transaction and are released only with COMMIT, ROLLBACK and ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, a concept of "sentinel" was introduced to MDL_context. All locks, HANDLER and others, reside in the same linked list. However, a selected element of the list separates locks with different life cycle. HANDLER locks always reside at the end of the list, after the sentinel. Transactional locks are prepended to the beginning of the list, before the sentinel. Thus, ROLLBACK, COMMIT or ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, only release those locks that reside before the sentinel. HANDLER locks must be released explicitly as part of HANDLER CLOSE statement, or an implicit close. The same approach with sentinel is also employed for LOCK TABLES locks. Since HANDLER and LOCK TABLES statement has never worked together, the implementation is made simple and only maintains one sentinel, which is used either for HANDLER locks, or for LOCK TABLES locks.
2009-12-22 19:09:15 +03:00
we don't release a transactional ticket, and
vice versa -- when we COMMIT, we don't mistakenly
release a ticket for an open HANDLER.
@retval TRUE Out of memory.
@retval FALSE Success.
*/
bool
MDL_context::clone_ticket(MDL_request *mdl_request)
{
MDL_ticket *ticket;
2010-02-02 02:22:16 +03:00
mysql_mutex_assert_not_owner(&LOCK_open);
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
/*
By submitting mdl_request->type to MDL_ticket::create()
we effectively downgrade the cloned lock to the level of
the request.
*/
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
if (!(ticket= MDL_ticket::create(this, mdl_request->type
#ifndef DBUG_OFF
, mdl_request->duration
#endif
)))
A prerequisite patch for the fix for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". Introduce a notion of a sentinel to MDL_context. A sentinel is a ticket that separates all tickets in the context into two groups: before and after it. Currently we can have (and need) only one designated sentinel -- it separates all locks taken by LOCK TABLE or HANDLER statement, which must survive COMMIT and ROLLBACK and all other locks, which must be released at COMMIT or ROLLBACK. The tricky part is maintaining the sentinel up to date when someone release its corresponding ticket. This can happen, e.g. if someone issues DROP TABLE under LOCK TABLES (generally, see all calls to release_all_locks_for_name()). MDL_context::release_ticket() is modified to take care of it. ****** A fix and a test case for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". An attempt to mix HANDLER SQL statements, which are transaction- agnostic, an open multi-statement transaction, and DDL against the involved tables (in a concurrent connection) could lead to a deadlock. The deadlock would occur when HANDLER OPEN or HANDLER READ would have to wait on a conflicting metadata lock. If the connection that issued HANDLER statement also had other metadata locks (say, acquired in scope of a transaction), a classical deadlock situation of mutual wait could occur. Incompatible change: entering LOCK TABLES mode automatically closes all open HANDLERs in the current connection. Incompatible change: previously an attempt to wait on a lock in a connection that has an open HANDLER statement could wait indefinitely/deadlock. After this patch, an error ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK is produced. The idea of the fix is to merge thd->handler_mdl_context with the main mdl_context of the connection, used for transactional locks. This makes deadlock detection possible, since all waits with locks are "visible" and available to analysis in a single MDL context of the connection. Since HANDLER locks and transactional locks have a different life cycle -- HANDLERs are explicitly open and closed, and so are HANDLER locks, explicitly acquired and released, whereas transactional locks "accumulate" till the end of a transaction and are released only with COMMIT, ROLLBACK and ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, a concept of "sentinel" was introduced to MDL_context. All locks, HANDLER and others, reside in the same linked list. However, a selected element of the list separates locks with different life cycle. HANDLER locks always reside at the end of the list, after the sentinel. Transactional locks are prepended to the beginning of the list, before the sentinel. Thus, ROLLBACK, COMMIT or ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, only release those locks that reside before the sentinel. HANDLER locks must be released explicitly as part of HANDLER CLOSE statement, or an implicit close. The same approach with sentinel is also employed for LOCK TABLES locks. Since HANDLER and LOCK TABLES statement has never worked together, the implementation is made simple and only maintains one sentinel, which is used either for HANDLER locks, or for LOCK TABLES locks.
2009-12-22 19:09:15 +03:00
return TRUE;
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
/* clone() is not supposed to be used to get a stronger lock. */
DBUG_ASSERT(mdl_request->ticket->has_stronger_or_equal_type(ticket->m_type));
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
A prerequisite patch for the fix for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". Introduce a notion of a sentinel to MDL_context. A sentinel is a ticket that separates all tickets in the context into two groups: before and after it. Currently we can have (and need) only one designated sentinel -- it separates all locks taken by LOCK TABLE or HANDLER statement, which must survive COMMIT and ROLLBACK and all other locks, which must be released at COMMIT or ROLLBACK. The tricky part is maintaining the sentinel up to date when someone release its corresponding ticket. This can happen, e.g. if someone issues DROP TABLE under LOCK TABLES (generally, see all calls to release_all_locks_for_name()). MDL_context::release_ticket() is modified to take care of it. ****** A fix and a test case for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". An attempt to mix HANDLER SQL statements, which are transaction- agnostic, an open multi-statement transaction, and DDL against the involved tables (in a concurrent connection) could lead to a deadlock. The deadlock would occur when HANDLER OPEN or HANDLER READ would have to wait on a conflicting metadata lock. If the connection that issued HANDLER statement also had other metadata locks (say, acquired in scope of a transaction), a classical deadlock situation of mutual wait could occur. Incompatible change: entering LOCK TABLES mode automatically closes all open HANDLERs in the current connection. Incompatible change: previously an attempt to wait on a lock in a connection that has an open HANDLER statement could wait indefinitely/deadlock. After this patch, an error ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK is produced. The idea of the fix is to merge thd->handler_mdl_context with the main mdl_context of the connection, used for transactional locks. This makes deadlock detection possible, since all waits with locks are "visible" and available to analysis in a single MDL context of the connection. Since HANDLER locks and transactional locks have a different life cycle -- HANDLERs are explicitly open and closed, and so are HANDLER locks, explicitly acquired and released, whereas transactional locks "accumulate" till the end of a transaction and are released only with COMMIT, ROLLBACK and ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, a concept of "sentinel" was introduced to MDL_context. All locks, HANDLER and others, reside in the same linked list. However, a selected element of the list separates locks with different life cycle. HANDLER locks always reside at the end of the list, after the sentinel. Transactional locks are prepended to the beginning of the list, before the sentinel. Thus, ROLLBACK, COMMIT or ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, only release those locks that reside before the sentinel. HANDLER locks must be released explicitly as part of HANDLER CLOSE statement, or an implicit close. The same approach with sentinel is also employed for LOCK TABLES locks. Since HANDLER and LOCK TABLES statement has never worked together, the implementation is made simple and only maintains one sentinel, which is used either for HANDLER locks, or for LOCK TABLES locks.
2009-12-22 19:09:15 +03:00
ticket->m_lock= mdl_request->ticket->m_lock;
mdl_request->ticket= ticket;
mysql_prlock_wrlock(&ticket->m_lock->m_rwlock);
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
ticket->m_lock->m_granted.add_ticket(ticket);
mysql_prlock_unlock(&ticket->m_lock->m_rwlock);
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
m_tickets[mdl_request->duration].push_front(ticket);
return FALSE;
}
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
/**
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
Notify threads holding a shared metadata locks on object which
conflict with a pending X, SNW or SNRW lock.
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
@param ctx MDL_context for current thread.
*/
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
void MDL_object_lock::notify_conflicting_locks(MDL_context *ctx)
{
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
Ticket_iterator it(m_granted);
MDL_ticket *conflicting_ticket;
while ((conflicting_ticket= it++))
{
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
/* Only try to abort locks on which we back off. */
if (conflicting_ticket->get_ctx() != ctx &&
conflicting_ticket->get_type() < MDL_SHARED_NO_WRITE)
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
{
MDL_context *conflicting_ctx= conflicting_ticket->get_ctx();
/*
If thread which holds conflicting lock is waiting on table-level
lock or some other non-MDL resource we might need to wake it up
by calling code outside of MDL.
*/
mysql_notify_thread_having_shared_lock(ctx->get_thd(),
conflicting_ctx->get_thd(),
conflicting_ctx->get_needs_thr_lock_abort());
}
}
}
/**
Notify threads holding scoped IX locks which conflict with a pending S lock.
@param ctx MDL_context for current thread.
*/
void MDL_scoped_lock::notify_conflicting_locks(MDL_context *ctx)
{
Ticket_iterator it(m_granted);
MDL_ticket *conflicting_ticket;
while ((conflicting_ticket= it++))
{
if (conflicting_ticket->get_ctx() != ctx &&
conflicting_ticket->get_type() == MDL_INTENTION_EXCLUSIVE)
{
MDL_context *conflicting_ctx= conflicting_ticket->get_ctx();
/*
Thread which holds global IX lock can be a handler thread for
insert delayed. We need to kill such threads in order to get
global shared lock. We do this my calling code outside of MDL.
*/
mysql_notify_thread_having_shared_lock(ctx->get_thd(),
conflicting_ctx->get_thd(),
conflicting_ctx->get_needs_thr_lock_abort());
}
}
}
/**
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
Acquire one lock with waiting for conflicting locks to go away if needed.
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
@param mdl_request [in/out] Lock request object for lock to be acquired
Bug #45225 Locking: hang if drop table with no timeout This patch introduces timeouts for metadata locks. The timeout is specified in seconds using the new dynamic system variable "lock_wait_timeout" which has both GLOBAL and SESSION scopes. Allowed values range from 1 to 31536000 seconds (= 1 year). The default value is 1 year. The new server parameter "lock-wait-timeout" can be used to set the default value parameter upon server startup. "lock_wait_timeout" applies to all statements that use metadata locks. These include DML and DDL operations on tables, views, stored procedures and stored functions. They also include LOCK TABLES, FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK and HANDLER statements. The patch also changes thr_lock.c code (table data locks used by MyISAM and other simplistic engines) to use the same system variable. InnoDB row locks are unaffected. One exception to the handling of the "lock_wait_timeout" variable is delayed inserts. All delayed inserts are executed with a timeout of 1 year regardless of the setting for the global variable. As the connection issuing the delayed insert gets no notification of delayed insert timeouts, we want to avoid unnecessary timeouts. It's important to note that the timeout value is used for each lock acquired and that one statement can take more than one lock. A statement can therefore block for longer than the lock_wait_timeout value before reporting a timeout error. When lock timeout occurs, ER_LOCK_WAIT_TIMEOUT is reported. Test case added to lock_multi.test.
2010-02-11 11:23:39 +01:00
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
@param lock_wait_timeout [in] Seconds to wait before timeout.
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
@retval FALSE Success. MDL_request::ticket points to the ticket
for the lock.
@retval TRUE Failure (Out of resources or waiting is aborted),
*/
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
bool
MDL_context::acquire_lock(MDL_request *mdl_request, ulong lock_wait_timeout)
{
MDL_lock *lock;
MDL_ticket *ticket;
Bug #45225 Locking: hang if drop table with no timeout This patch introduces timeouts for metadata locks. The timeout is specified in seconds using the new dynamic system variable "lock_wait_timeout" which has both GLOBAL and SESSION scopes. Allowed values range from 1 to 31536000 seconds (= 1 year). The default value is 1 year. The new server parameter "lock-wait-timeout" can be used to set the default value parameter upon server startup. "lock_wait_timeout" applies to all statements that use metadata locks. These include DML and DDL operations on tables, views, stored procedures and stored functions. They also include LOCK TABLES, FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK and HANDLER statements. The patch also changes thr_lock.c code (table data locks used by MyISAM and other simplistic engines) to use the same system variable. InnoDB row locks are unaffected. One exception to the handling of the "lock_wait_timeout" variable is delayed inserts. All delayed inserts are executed with a timeout of 1 year regardless of the setting for the global variable. As the connection issuing the delayed insert gets no notification of delayed insert timeouts, we want to avoid unnecessary timeouts. It's important to note that the timeout value is used for each lock acquired and that one statement can take more than one lock. A statement can therefore block for longer than the lock_wait_timeout value before reporting a timeout error. When lock timeout occurs, ER_LOCK_WAIT_TIMEOUT is reported. Test case added to lock_multi.test.
2010-02-11 11:23:39 +01:00
struct timespec abs_timeout;
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
MDL_wait::enum_wait_status wait_status;
/* Do some work outside the critical section. */
Bug #45225 Locking: hang if drop table with no timeout This patch introduces timeouts for metadata locks. The timeout is specified in seconds using the new dynamic system variable "lock_wait_timeout" which has both GLOBAL and SESSION scopes. Allowed values range from 1 to 31536000 seconds (= 1 year). The default value is 1 year. The new server parameter "lock-wait-timeout" can be used to set the default value parameter upon server startup. "lock_wait_timeout" applies to all statements that use metadata locks. These include DML and DDL operations on tables, views, stored procedures and stored functions. They also include LOCK TABLES, FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK and HANDLER statements. The patch also changes thr_lock.c code (table data locks used by MyISAM and other simplistic engines) to use the same system variable. InnoDB row locks are unaffected. One exception to the handling of the "lock_wait_timeout" variable is delayed inserts. All delayed inserts are executed with a timeout of 1 year regardless of the setting for the global variable. As the connection issuing the delayed insert gets no notification of delayed insert timeouts, we want to avoid unnecessary timeouts. It's important to note that the timeout value is used for each lock acquired and that one statement can take more than one lock. A statement can therefore block for longer than the lock_wait_timeout value before reporting a timeout error. When lock timeout occurs, ER_LOCK_WAIT_TIMEOUT is reported. Test case added to lock_multi.test.
2010-02-11 11:23:39 +01:00
set_timespec(abs_timeout, lock_wait_timeout);
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
if (try_acquire_lock_impl(mdl_request, &ticket))
return TRUE;
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
if (mdl_request->ticket)
{
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
/*
We have managed to acquire lock without waiting.
MDL_lock, MDL_context and MDL_request were updated
accordingly, so we can simply return success.
*/
return FALSE;
}
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
/*
Our attempt to acquire lock without waiting has failed.
As a result of this attempt we got MDL_ticket with m_lock
member pointing to the corresponding MDL_lock object which
has MDL_lock::m_rwlock write-locked.
*/
lock= ticket->m_lock;
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
lock->m_waiting.add_ticket(ticket);
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
/*
Once we added a pending ticket to the waiting queue,
we must ensure that our wait slot is empty, so
that our lock request can be scheduled. Do that in the
critical section formed by the acquired write lock on MDL_lock.
*/
m_wait.reset_status();
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
if (lock->needs_notification(ticket))
lock->notify_conflicting_locks(this);
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
mysql_prlock_unlock(&lock->m_rwlock);
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
will_wait_for(ticket);
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
/* There is a shared or exclusive lock on the object. */
DEBUG_SYNC(m_thd, "mdl_acquire_lock_wait");
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
find_deadlock();
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
if (lock->needs_notification(ticket))
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
{
struct timespec abs_shortwait;
set_timespec(abs_shortwait, 1);
wait_status= MDL_wait::EMPTY;
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
while (cmp_timespec(abs_shortwait, abs_timeout) <= 0)
Bug #45225 Locking: hang if drop table with no timeout This patch introduces timeouts for metadata locks. The timeout is specified in seconds using the new dynamic system variable "lock_wait_timeout" which has both GLOBAL and SESSION scopes. Allowed values range from 1 to 31536000 seconds (= 1 year). The default value is 1 year. The new server parameter "lock-wait-timeout" can be used to set the default value parameter upon server startup. "lock_wait_timeout" applies to all statements that use metadata locks. These include DML and DDL operations on tables, views, stored procedures and stored functions. They also include LOCK TABLES, FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK and HANDLER statements. The patch also changes thr_lock.c code (table data locks used by MyISAM and other simplistic engines) to use the same system variable. InnoDB row locks are unaffected. One exception to the handling of the "lock_wait_timeout" variable is delayed inserts. All delayed inserts are executed with a timeout of 1 year regardless of the setting for the global variable. As the connection issuing the delayed insert gets no notification of delayed insert timeouts, we want to avoid unnecessary timeouts. It's important to note that the timeout value is used for each lock acquired and that one statement can take more than one lock. A statement can therefore block for longer than the lock_wait_timeout value before reporting a timeout error. When lock timeout occurs, ER_LOCK_WAIT_TIMEOUT is reported. Test case added to lock_multi.test.
2010-02-11 11:23:39 +01:00
{
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
/* abs_timeout is far away. Wait a short while and notify locks. */
wait_status= m_wait.timed_wait(m_thd, &abs_shortwait, FALSE,
mdl_request->key.get_wait_state_name());
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
if (wait_status != MDL_wait::EMPTY)
break;
mysql_prlock_wrlock(&lock->m_rwlock);
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
lock->notify_conflicting_locks(this);
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
mysql_prlock_unlock(&lock->m_rwlock);
Bug #45225 Locking: hang if drop table with no timeout This patch introduces timeouts for metadata locks. The timeout is specified in seconds using the new dynamic system variable "lock_wait_timeout" which has both GLOBAL and SESSION scopes. Allowed values range from 1 to 31536000 seconds (= 1 year). The default value is 1 year. The new server parameter "lock-wait-timeout" can be used to set the default value parameter upon server startup. "lock_wait_timeout" applies to all statements that use metadata locks. These include DML and DDL operations on tables, views, stored procedures and stored functions. They also include LOCK TABLES, FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK and HANDLER statements. The patch also changes thr_lock.c code (table data locks used by MyISAM and other simplistic engines) to use the same system variable. InnoDB row locks are unaffected. One exception to the handling of the "lock_wait_timeout" variable is delayed inserts. All delayed inserts are executed with a timeout of 1 year regardless of the setting for the global variable. As the connection issuing the delayed insert gets no notification of delayed insert timeouts, we want to avoid unnecessary timeouts. It's important to note that the timeout value is used for each lock acquired and that one statement can take more than one lock. A statement can therefore block for longer than the lock_wait_timeout value before reporting a timeout error. When lock timeout occurs, ER_LOCK_WAIT_TIMEOUT is reported. Test case added to lock_multi.test.
2010-02-11 11:23:39 +01:00
set_timespec(abs_shortwait, 1);
}
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
if (wait_status == MDL_wait::EMPTY)
wait_status= m_wait.timed_wait(m_thd, &abs_timeout, TRUE,
mdl_request->key.get_wait_state_name());
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
}
else
wait_status= m_wait.timed_wait(m_thd, &abs_timeout, TRUE,
mdl_request->key.get_wait_state_name());
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
done_waiting_for();
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
if (wait_status != MDL_wait::GRANTED)
{
lock->remove_ticket(&MDL_lock::m_waiting, ticket);
MDL_ticket::destroy(ticket);
switch (wait_status)
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
{
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
case MDL_wait::VICTIM:
my_error(ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK, MYF(0));
break;
case MDL_wait::TIMEOUT:
my_error(ER_LOCK_WAIT_TIMEOUT, MYF(0));
break;
case MDL_wait::KILLED:
break;
default:
DBUG_ASSERT(0);
break;
}
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
return TRUE;
}
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
/*
We have been granted our request.
State of MDL_lock object is already being appropriately updated by a
concurrent thread (@sa MDL_lock:reschedule_waiters()).
So all we need to do is to update MDL_context and MDL_request objects.
*/
DBUG_ASSERT(wait_status == MDL_wait::GRANTED);
A prerequisite patch for the fix for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". Introduce a notion of a sentinel to MDL_context. A sentinel is a ticket that separates all tickets in the context into two groups: before and after it. Currently we can have (and need) only one designated sentinel -- it separates all locks taken by LOCK TABLE or HANDLER statement, which must survive COMMIT and ROLLBACK and all other locks, which must be released at COMMIT or ROLLBACK. The tricky part is maintaining the sentinel up to date when someone release its corresponding ticket. This can happen, e.g. if someone issues DROP TABLE under LOCK TABLES (generally, see all calls to release_all_locks_for_name()). MDL_context::release_ticket() is modified to take care of it. ****** A fix and a test case for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". An attempt to mix HANDLER SQL statements, which are transaction- agnostic, an open multi-statement transaction, and DDL against the involved tables (in a concurrent connection) could lead to a deadlock. The deadlock would occur when HANDLER OPEN or HANDLER READ would have to wait on a conflicting metadata lock. If the connection that issued HANDLER statement also had other metadata locks (say, acquired in scope of a transaction), a classical deadlock situation of mutual wait could occur. Incompatible change: entering LOCK TABLES mode automatically closes all open HANDLERs in the current connection. Incompatible change: previously an attempt to wait on a lock in a connection that has an open HANDLER statement could wait indefinitely/deadlock. After this patch, an error ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK is produced. The idea of the fix is to merge thd->handler_mdl_context with the main mdl_context of the connection, used for transactional locks. This makes deadlock detection possible, since all waits with locks are "visible" and available to analysis in a single MDL context of the connection. Since HANDLER locks and transactional locks have a different life cycle -- HANDLERs are explicitly open and closed, and so are HANDLER locks, explicitly acquired and released, whereas transactional locks "accumulate" till the end of a transaction and are released only with COMMIT, ROLLBACK and ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, a concept of "sentinel" was introduced to MDL_context. All locks, HANDLER and others, reside in the same linked list. However, a selected element of the list separates locks with different life cycle. HANDLER locks always reside at the end of the list, after the sentinel. Transactional locks are prepended to the beginning of the list, before the sentinel. Thus, ROLLBACK, COMMIT or ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, only release those locks that reside before the sentinel. HANDLER locks must be released explicitly as part of HANDLER CLOSE statement, or an implicit close. The same approach with sentinel is also employed for LOCK TABLES locks. Since HANDLER and LOCK TABLES statement has never worked together, the implementation is made simple and only maintains one sentinel, which is used either for HANDLER locks, or for LOCK TABLES locks.
2009-12-22 19:09:15 +03:00
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
m_tickets[mdl_request->duration].push_front(ticket);
A prerequisite patch for the fix for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". Introduce a notion of a sentinel to MDL_context. A sentinel is a ticket that separates all tickets in the context into two groups: before and after it. Currently we can have (and need) only one designated sentinel -- it separates all locks taken by LOCK TABLE or HANDLER statement, which must survive COMMIT and ROLLBACK and all other locks, which must be released at COMMIT or ROLLBACK. The tricky part is maintaining the sentinel up to date when someone release its corresponding ticket. This can happen, e.g. if someone issues DROP TABLE under LOCK TABLES (generally, see all calls to release_all_locks_for_name()). MDL_context::release_ticket() is modified to take care of it. ****** A fix and a test case for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". An attempt to mix HANDLER SQL statements, which are transaction- agnostic, an open multi-statement transaction, and DDL against the involved tables (in a concurrent connection) could lead to a deadlock. The deadlock would occur when HANDLER OPEN or HANDLER READ would have to wait on a conflicting metadata lock. If the connection that issued HANDLER statement also had other metadata locks (say, acquired in scope of a transaction), a classical deadlock situation of mutual wait could occur. Incompatible change: entering LOCK TABLES mode automatically closes all open HANDLERs in the current connection. Incompatible change: previously an attempt to wait on a lock in a connection that has an open HANDLER statement could wait indefinitely/deadlock. After this patch, an error ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK is produced. The idea of the fix is to merge thd->handler_mdl_context with the main mdl_context of the connection, used for transactional locks. This makes deadlock detection possible, since all waits with locks are "visible" and available to analysis in a single MDL context of the connection. Since HANDLER locks and transactional locks have a different life cycle -- HANDLERs are explicitly open and closed, and so are HANDLER locks, explicitly acquired and released, whereas transactional locks "accumulate" till the end of a transaction and are released only with COMMIT, ROLLBACK and ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, a concept of "sentinel" was introduced to MDL_context. All locks, HANDLER and others, reside in the same linked list. However, a selected element of the list separates locks with different life cycle. HANDLER locks always reside at the end of the list, after the sentinel. Transactional locks are prepended to the beginning of the list, before the sentinel. Thus, ROLLBACK, COMMIT or ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, only release those locks that reside before the sentinel. HANDLER locks must be released explicitly as part of HANDLER CLOSE statement, or an implicit close. The same approach with sentinel is also employed for LOCK TABLES locks. Since HANDLER and LOCK TABLES statement has never worked together, the implementation is made simple and only maintains one sentinel, which is used either for HANDLER locks, or for LOCK TABLES locks.
2009-12-22 19:09:15 +03:00
mdl_request->ticket= ticket;
A prerequisite patch for the fix for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". Introduce a notion of a sentinel to MDL_context. A sentinel is a ticket that separates all tickets in the context into two groups: before and after it. Currently we can have (and need) only one designated sentinel -- it separates all locks taken by LOCK TABLE or HANDLER statement, which must survive COMMIT and ROLLBACK and all other locks, which must be released at COMMIT or ROLLBACK. The tricky part is maintaining the sentinel up to date when someone release its corresponding ticket. This can happen, e.g. if someone issues DROP TABLE under LOCK TABLES (generally, see all calls to release_all_locks_for_name()). MDL_context::release_ticket() is modified to take care of it. ****** A fix and a test case for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". An attempt to mix HANDLER SQL statements, which are transaction- agnostic, an open multi-statement transaction, and DDL against the involved tables (in a concurrent connection) could lead to a deadlock. The deadlock would occur when HANDLER OPEN or HANDLER READ would have to wait on a conflicting metadata lock. If the connection that issued HANDLER statement also had other metadata locks (say, acquired in scope of a transaction), a classical deadlock situation of mutual wait could occur. Incompatible change: entering LOCK TABLES mode automatically closes all open HANDLERs in the current connection. Incompatible change: previously an attempt to wait on a lock in a connection that has an open HANDLER statement could wait indefinitely/deadlock. After this patch, an error ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK is produced. The idea of the fix is to merge thd->handler_mdl_context with the main mdl_context of the connection, used for transactional locks. This makes deadlock detection possible, since all waits with locks are "visible" and available to analysis in a single MDL context of the connection. Since HANDLER locks and transactional locks have a different life cycle -- HANDLERs are explicitly open and closed, and so are HANDLER locks, explicitly acquired and released, whereas transactional locks "accumulate" till the end of a transaction and are released only with COMMIT, ROLLBACK and ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, a concept of "sentinel" was introduced to MDL_context. All locks, HANDLER and others, reside in the same linked list. However, a selected element of the list separates locks with different life cycle. HANDLER locks always reside at the end of the list, after the sentinel. Transactional locks are prepended to the beginning of the list, before the sentinel. Thus, ROLLBACK, COMMIT or ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, only release those locks that reside before the sentinel. HANDLER locks must be released explicitly as part of HANDLER CLOSE statement, or an implicit close. The same approach with sentinel is also employed for LOCK TABLES locks. Since HANDLER and LOCK TABLES statement has never worked together, the implementation is made simple and only maintains one sentinel, which is used either for HANDLER locks, or for LOCK TABLES locks.
2009-12-22 19:09:15 +03:00
return FALSE;
}
extern "C" int mdl_request_ptr_cmp(const void* ptr1, const void* ptr2)
{
MDL_request *req1= *(MDL_request**)ptr1;
MDL_request *req2= *(MDL_request**)ptr2;
return req1->key.cmp(&req2->key);
}
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
/**
Acquire exclusive locks. There must be no granted locks in the
context.
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
This is a replacement of lock_table_names(). It is used in
RENAME, DROP and other DDL SQL statements.
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
@param mdl_requests List of requests for locks to be acquired.
Bug #45225 Locking: hang if drop table with no timeout This patch introduces timeouts for metadata locks. The timeout is specified in seconds using the new dynamic system variable "lock_wait_timeout" which has both GLOBAL and SESSION scopes. Allowed values range from 1 to 31536000 seconds (= 1 year). The default value is 1 year. The new server parameter "lock-wait-timeout" can be used to set the default value parameter upon server startup. "lock_wait_timeout" applies to all statements that use metadata locks. These include DML and DDL operations on tables, views, stored procedures and stored functions. They also include LOCK TABLES, FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK and HANDLER statements. The patch also changes thr_lock.c code (table data locks used by MyISAM and other simplistic engines) to use the same system variable. InnoDB row locks are unaffected. One exception to the handling of the "lock_wait_timeout" variable is delayed inserts. All delayed inserts are executed with a timeout of 1 year regardless of the setting for the global variable. As the connection issuing the delayed insert gets no notification of delayed insert timeouts, we want to avoid unnecessary timeouts. It's important to note that the timeout value is used for each lock acquired and that one statement can take more than one lock. A statement can therefore block for longer than the lock_wait_timeout value before reporting a timeout error. When lock timeout occurs, ER_LOCK_WAIT_TIMEOUT is reported. Test case added to lock_multi.test.
2010-02-11 11:23:39 +01:00
@param lock_wait_timeout Seconds to wait before timeout.
@note The list of requests should not contain non-exclusive lock requests.
There should not be any acquired locks in the context.
@note Assumes that one already owns scoped intention exclusive lock.
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
@retval FALSE Success
@retval TRUE Failure
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
*/
Bug #45225 Locking: hang if drop table with no timeout This patch introduces timeouts for metadata locks. The timeout is specified in seconds using the new dynamic system variable "lock_wait_timeout" which has both GLOBAL and SESSION scopes. Allowed values range from 1 to 31536000 seconds (= 1 year). The default value is 1 year. The new server parameter "lock-wait-timeout" can be used to set the default value parameter upon server startup. "lock_wait_timeout" applies to all statements that use metadata locks. These include DML and DDL operations on tables, views, stored procedures and stored functions. They also include LOCK TABLES, FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK and HANDLER statements. The patch also changes thr_lock.c code (table data locks used by MyISAM and other simplistic engines) to use the same system variable. InnoDB row locks are unaffected. One exception to the handling of the "lock_wait_timeout" variable is delayed inserts. All delayed inserts are executed with a timeout of 1 year regardless of the setting for the global variable. As the connection issuing the delayed insert gets no notification of delayed insert timeouts, we want to avoid unnecessary timeouts. It's important to note that the timeout value is used for each lock acquired and that one statement can take more than one lock. A statement can therefore block for longer than the lock_wait_timeout value before reporting a timeout error. When lock timeout occurs, ER_LOCK_WAIT_TIMEOUT is reported. Test case added to lock_multi.test.
2010-02-11 11:23:39 +01:00
bool MDL_context::acquire_locks(MDL_request_list *mdl_requests,
ulong lock_wait_timeout)
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
{
MDL_request_list::Iterator it(*mdl_requests);
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
MDL_request **sort_buf, **p_req;
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
MDL_savepoint mdl_svp= mdl_savepoint();
ssize_t req_count= static_cast<ssize_t>(mdl_requests->elements());
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
if (req_count == 0)
return FALSE;
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
/* Sort requests according to MDL_key. */
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
if (! (sort_buf= (MDL_request **)my_malloc(req_count *
sizeof(MDL_request*),
MYF(MY_WME))))
return TRUE;
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
for (p_req= sort_buf; p_req < sort_buf + req_count; p_req++)
*p_req= it++;
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
my_qsort(sort_buf, req_count, sizeof(MDL_request*),
mdl_request_ptr_cmp);
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
for (p_req= sort_buf; p_req < sort_buf + req_count; p_req++)
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
{
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
if (acquire_lock(*p_req, lock_wait_timeout))
goto err;
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
}
Bug#34043: Server loops excessively in _checkchunk() when safemalloc is enabled Essentially, the problem is that safemalloc is excruciatingly slow as it checks all allocated blocks for overrun at each memory management primitive, yielding a almost exponential slowdown for the memory management functions (malloc, realloc, free). The overrun check basically consists of verifying some bytes of a block for certain magic keys, which catches some simple forms of overrun. Another minor problem is violation of aliasing rules and that its own internal list of blocks is prone to corruption. Another issue with safemalloc is rather the maintenance cost as the tool has a significant impact on the server code. Given the magnitude of memory debuggers available nowadays, especially those that are provided with the platform malloc implementation, maintenance of a in-house and largely obsolete memory debugger becomes a burden that is not worth the effort due to its slowness and lack of support for detecting more common forms of heap corruption. Since there are third-party tools that can provide the same functionality at a lower or comparable performance cost, the solution is to simply remove safemalloc. Third-party tools can provide the same functionality at a lower or comparable performance cost. The removal of safemalloc also allows a simplification of the malloc wrappers, removing quite a bit of kludge: redefinition of my_malloc, my_free and the removal of the unused second argument of my_free. Since free() always check whether the supplied pointer is null, redudant checks are also removed. Also, this patch adds unit testing for my_malloc and moves my_realloc implementation into the same file as the other memory allocation primitives.
2010-07-08 18:20:08 -03:00
my_free(sort_buf);
return FALSE;
err:
/*
Release locks we have managed to acquire so far.
Use rollback_to_savepoint() since there may be duplicate
requests that got assigned the same ticket.
*/
rollback_to_savepoint(mdl_svp);
/* Reset lock requests back to its initial state. */
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
for (req_count= p_req - sort_buf, p_req= sort_buf;
p_req < sort_buf + req_count; p_req++)
{
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
(*p_req)->ticket= NULL;
}
Bug#34043: Server loops excessively in _checkchunk() when safemalloc is enabled Essentially, the problem is that safemalloc is excruciatingly slow as it checks all allocated blocks for overrun at each memory management primitive, yielding a almost exponential slowdown for the memory management functions (malloc, realloc, free). The overrun check basically consists of verifying some bytes of a block for certain magic keys, which catches some simple forms of overrun. Another minor problem is violation of aliasing rules and that its own internal list of blocks is prone to corruption. Another issue with safemalloc is rather the maintenance cost as the tool has a significant impact on the server code. Given the magnitude of memory debuggers available nowadays, especially those that are provided with the platform malloc implementation, maintenance of a in-house and largely obsolete memory debugger becomes a burden that is not worth the effort due to its slowness and lack of support for detecting more common forms of heap corruption. Since there are third-party tools that can provide the same functionality at a lower or comparable performance cost, the solution is to simply remove safemalloc. Third-party tools can provide the same functionality at a lower or comparable performance cost. The removal of safemalloc also allows a simplification of the malloc wrappers, removing quite a bit of kludge: redefinition of my_malloc, my_free and the removal of the unused second argument of my_free. Since free() always check whether the supplied pointer is null, redudant checks are also removed. Also, this patch adds unit testing for my_malloc and moves my_realloc implementation into the same file as the other memory allocation primitives.
2010-07-08 18:20:08 -03:00
my_free(sort_buf);
return TRUE;
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
}
/**
Upgrade a shared metadata lock to exclusive.
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
Used in ALTER TABLE, when a copy of the table with the
new definition has been constructed.
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
Bug #45225 Locking: hang if drop table with no timeout This patch introduces timeouts for metadata locks. The timeout is specified in seconds using the new dynamic system variable "lock_wait_timeout" which has both GLOBAL and SESSION scopes. Allowed values range from 1 to 31536000 seconds (= 1 year). The default value is 1 year. The new server parameter "lock-wait-timeout" can be used to set the default value parameter upon server startup. "lock_wait_timeout" applies to all statements that use metadata locks. These include DML and DDL operations on tables, views, stored procedures and stored functions. They also include LOCK TABLES, FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK and HANDLER statements. The patch also changes thr_lock.c code (table data locks used by MyISAM and other simplistic engines) to use the same system variable. InnoDB row locks are unaffected. One exception to the handling of the "lock_wait_timeout" variable is delayed inserts. All delayed inserts are executed with a timeout of 1 year regardless of the setting for the global variable. As the connection issuing the delayed insert gets no notification of delayed insert timeouts, we want to avoid unnecessary timeouts. It's important to note that the timeout value is used for each lock acquired and that one statement can take more than one lock. A statement can therefore block for longer than the lock_wait_timeout value before reporting a timeout error. When lock timeout occurs, ER_LOCK_WAIT_TIMEOUT is reported. Test case added to lock_multi.test.
2010-02-11 11:23:39 +01:00
@param lock_wait_timeout Seconds to wait before timeout.
@note In case of failure to upgrade lock (e.g. because upgrader
was killed) leaves lock in its original state (locked in
shared mode).
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
@note There can be only one upgrader for a lock or we will have deadlock.
Fix for bug #51263 "Deadlock between transactional SELECT and ALTER TABLE ... REBUILD PARTITION". ALTER TABLE on InnoDB table (including partitioned tables) acquired exclusive locks on rows of table being altered. In cases when there was concurrent transaction which did locking reads from this table this sometimes led to a deadlock which was not detected by MDL subsystem nor by InnoDB engine (and was reported only after exceeding innodb_lock_wait_timeout). This problem stemmed from the fact that ALTER TABLE acquired TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock on table being altered. This lock was interpreted as a write lock and thus for table being altered handler::external_lock() method was called with F_WRLCK as an argument. As result InnoDB engine treated ALTER TABLE as an operation which is going to change data and acquired LOCK_X locks on rows being read from old version of table. In case when there was a transaction which already acquired SR metadata lock on table and some LOCK_S locks on its rows (e.g. by using it in subquery of DML statement) concurrent ALTER TABLE was blocked at the moment when it tried to acquire LOCK_X lock before reading one of these rows. The transaction's attempt to acquire SW metadata lock on table being altered led to deadlock, since it had to wait for ALTER TABLE to release SNW lock. This deadlock was not detected and got resolved only after timeout expiring because waiting were happening in two different subsystems. Similar deadlocks could have occured in other situations. This patch tries to solve the problem by changing ALTER TABLE implementation to use TL_READ_NO_INSERT lock instead of TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ. After this step handler::external_lock() is called with F_RDLCK as an argument and InnoDB engine correctly interprets ALTER TABLE as operation which only reads data from original version of table. Thanks to this ALTER TABLE acquires only LOCK_S locks on rows it reads. This, in its turn, causes inter-subsystem deadlocks to go away, as all potential lock conflicts and thus deadlocks will be limited to metadata locking subsystem: - When ALTER TABLE reads rows from table being altered it can't encounter any locks which conflict with LOCK_S row locks. There should be no concurrent transactions holding LOCK_X row locks. Such a transaction should have been acquired SW metadata lock on table first which would have conflicted with ALTER's SNW lock. - Vice versa, when DML which runs concurrently with ALTER TABLE tries to lock row it should be requesting only LOCK_S lock which is compatible with locks acquired by ALTER, as otherwise such DML must own an SW metadata lock on table which would be incompatible with ALTER's SNW lock.
2010-05-26 16:18:08 +04:00
This invariant is ensured by the fact that upgradeable locks SNW
and SNRW are not compatible with each other and themselves.
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
@retval FALSE Success
@retval TRUE Failure (thread was killed)
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
*/
bool
Bug #45225 Locking: hang if drop table with no timeout This patch introduces timeouts for metadata locks. The timeout is specified in seconds using the new dynamic system variable "lock_wait_timeout" which has both GLOBAL and SESSION scopes. Allowed values range from 1 to 31536000 seconds (= 1 year). The default value is 1 year. The new server parameter "lock-wait-timeout" can be used to set the default value parameter upon server startup. "lock_wait_timeout" applies to all statements that use metadata locks. These include DML and DDL operations on tables, views, stored procedures and stored functions. They also include LOCK TABLES, FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK and HANDLER statements. The patch also changes thr_lock.c code (table data locks used by MyISAM and other simplistic engines) to use the same system variable. InnoDB row locks are unaffected. One exception to the handling of the "lock_wait_timeout" variable is delayed inserts. All delayed inserts are executed with a timeout of 1 year regardless of the setting for the global variable. As the connection issuing the delayed insert gets no notification of delayed insert timeouts, we want to avoid unnecessary timeouts. It's important to note that the timeout value is used for each lock acquired and that one statement can take more than one lock. A statement can therefore block for longer than the lock_wait_timeout value before reporting a timeout error. When lock timeout occurs, ER_LOCK_WAIT_TIMEOUT is reported. Test case added to lock_multi.test.
2010-02-11 11:23:39 +01:00
MDL_context::upgrade_shared_lock_to_exclusive(MDL_ticket *mdl_ticket,
ulong lock_wait_timeout)
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
{
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
MDL_request mdl_xlock_request;
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
MDL_savepoint mdl_svp= mdl_savepoint();
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
bool is_new_ticket;
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
DBUG_ENTER("MDL_ticket::upgrade_shared_lock_to_exclusive");
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
DEBUG_SYNC(get_thd(), "mdl_upgrade_shared_lock_to_exclusive");
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
/*
Do nothing if already upgraded. Used when we FLUSH TABLE under
LOCK TABLES and a table is listed twice in LOCK TABLES list.
*/
if (mdl_ticket->m_type == MDL_EXCLUSIVE)
DBUG_RETURN(FALSE);
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
/* Only allow upgrades from MDL_SHARED_NO_WRITE/NO_READ_WRITE */
DBUG_ASSERT(mdl_ticket->m_type == MDL_SHARED_NO_WRITE ||
mdl_ticket->m_type == MDL_SHARED_NO_READ_WRITE);
2009-12-09 10:44:01 +01:00
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
mdl_xlock_request.init(&mdl_ticket->m_lock->key, MDL_EXCLUSIVE,
MDL_TRANSACTION);
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
if (acquire_lock(&mdl_xlock_request, lock_wait_timeout))
Implementation of simple deadlock detection for metadata locks. This change is supposed to reduce number of ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK errors which occur when multi-statement transaction encounters conflicting metadata lock in cases when waiting is possible. The idea is not to fail ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error immediately when we encounter conflicting metadata lock. Instead we release all metadata locks acquired by current statement and start to wait until conflicting lock go away. To avoid deadlocks we use simple empiric which aborts waiting with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error if it turns out that somebody is waiting for metadata locks owned by this transaction. This patch also fixes bug #46273 "MySQL 5.4.4 new MDL: Bug#989 is not fully fixed in case of ALTER". The bug was that concurrent execution of UPDATE or MULTI-UPDATE statement as a part of multi-statement transaction that already has used table being updated and ALTER TABLE statement might have resulted of loss of isolation between this transaction and ALTER TABLE statement, which manifested itself as changes performed by ALTER TABLE becoming visible in transaction and wrong binary log order as a consequence. This problem occurred when UPDATE or MULTI-UPDATE's wait in mysql_lock_tables() call was aborted due to metadata lock upgrade performed by concurrent ALTER TABLE. After such abort all metadata locks held by transaction were released but transaction silently continued to be executed as if nothing has happened. We solve this problem by changing our code not to release all locks in such case. Instead we release only locks which were acquired by current statement and then try to reacquire them by restarting open/lock tables process. We piggyback on simple deadlock detector implementation since this change has to be done anyway for it.
2009-12-30 20:53:30 +03:00
DBUG_RETURN(TRUE);
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
is_new_ticket= ! has_lock(mdl_svp, mdl_xlock_request.ticket);
Implementation of simple deadlock detection for metadata locks. This change is supposed to reduce number of ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK errors which occur when multi-statement transaction encounters conflicting metadata lock in cases when waiting is possible. The idea is not to fail ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error immediately when we encounter conflicting metadata lock. Instead we release all metadata locks acquired by current statement and start to wait until conflicting lock go away. To avoid deadlocks we use simple empiric which aborts waiting with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error if it turns out that somebody is waiting for metadata locks owned by this transaction. This patch also fixes bug #46273 "MySQL 5.4.4 new MDL: Bug#989 is not fully fixed in case of ALTER". The bug was that concurrent execution of UPDATE or MULTI-UPDATE statement as a part of multi-statement transaction that already has used table being updated and ALTER TABLE statement might have resulted of loss of isolation between this transaction and ALTER TABLE statement, which manifested itself as changes performed by ALTER TABLE becoming visible in transaction and wrong binary log order as a consequence. This problem occurred when UPDATE or MULTI-UPDATE's wait in mysql_lock_tables() call was aborted due to metadata lock upgrade performed by concurrent ALTER TABLE. After such abort all metadata locks held by transaction were released but transaction silently continued to be executed as if nothing has happened. We solve this problem by changing our code not to release all locks in such case. Instead we release only locks which were acquired by current statement and then try to reacquire them by restarting open/lock tables process. We piggyback on simple deadlock detector implementation since this change has to be done anyway for it.
2009-12-30 20:53:30 +03:00
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
/* Merge the acquired and the original lock. @todo: move to a method. */
mysql_prlock_wrlock(&mdl_ticket->m_lock->m_rwlock);
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
if (is_new_ticket)
mdl_ticket->m_lock->m_granted.remove_ticket(mdl_xlock_request.ticket);
/*
Set the new type of lock in the ticket. To update state of
MDL_lock object correctly we need to temporarily exclude
ticket from the granted queue and then include it back.
*/
mdl_ticket->m_lock->m_granted.remove_ticket(mdl_ticket);
mdl_ticket->m_type= MDL_EXCLUSIVE;
mdl_ticket->m_lock->m_granted.add_ticket(mdl_ticket);
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
mysql_prlock_unlock(&mdl_ticket->m_lock->m_rwlock);
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
if (is_new_ticket)
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
{
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
m_tickets[MDL_TRANSACTION].remove(mdl_xlock_request.ticket);
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
MDL_ticket::destroy(mdl_xlock_request.ticket);
}
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
DBUG_RETURN(FALSE);
}
Implementation of simple deadlock detection for metadata locks. This change is supposed to reduce number of ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK errors which occur when multi-statement transaction encounters conflicting metadata lock in cases when waiting is possible. The idea is not to fail ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error immediately when we encounter conflicting metadata lock. Instead we release all metadata locks acquired by current statement and start to wait until conflicting lock go away. To avoid deadlocks we use simple empiric which aborts waiting with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error if it turns out that somebody is waiting for metadata locks owned by this transaction. This patch also fixes bug #46273 "MySQL 5.4.4 new MDL: Bug#989 is not fully fixed in case of ALTER". The bug was that concurrent execution of UPDATE or MULTI-UPDATE statement as a part of multi-statement transaction that already has used table being updated and ALTER TABLE statement might have resulted of loss of isolation between this transaction and ALTER TABLE statement, which manifested itself as changes performed by ALTER TABLE becoming visible in transaction and wrong binary log order as a consequence. This problem occurred when UPDATE or MULTI-UPDATE's wait in mysql_lock_tables() call was aborted due to metadata lock upgrade performed by concurrent ALTER TABLE. After such abort all metadata locks held by transaction were released but transaction silently continued to be executed as if nothing has happened. We solve this problem by changing our code not to release all locks in such case. Instead we release only locks which were acquired by current statement and then try to reacquire them by restarting open/lock tables process. We piggyback on simple deadlock detector implementation since this change has to be done anyway for it.
2009-12-30 20:53:30 +03:00
/**
A fragment of recursive traversal of the wait-for graph
in search for deadlocks. Direct the deadlock visitor to all
contexts that own the lock the current node in the wait-for
graph is waiting for.
As long as the initial node is remembered in the visitor,
a deadlock is found when the same node is seen twice.
*/
bool MDL_lock::visit_subgraph(MDL_ticket *waiting_ticket,
MDL_wait_for_graph_visitor *gvisitor)
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
{
MDL_ticket *ticket;
MDL_context *src_ctx= waiting_ticket->get_ctx();
bool result= TRUE;
mysql_prlock_rdlock(&m_rwlock);
/* Must be initialized after taking a read lock. */
Ticket_iterator granted_it(m_granted);
Ticket_iterator waiting_it(m_waiting);
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
/*
MDL_lock's waiting and granted queues and MDL_context::m_waiting_for
member are updated by different threads when the lock is granted
(see MDL_context::acquire_lock() and MDL_lock::reschedule_waiters()).
As a result, here we may encounter a situation when MDL_lock data
already reflects the fact that the lock was granted but
m_waiting_for member has not been updated yet.
For example, imagine that:
thread1: Owns SNW lock on table t1.
thread2: Attempts to acquire SW lock on t1,
but sees an active SNW lock.
Thus adds the ticket to the waiting queue and
sets m_waiting_for to point to the ticket.
thread1: Releases SNW lock, updates MDL_lock object to
grant SW lock to thread2 (moves the ticket for
SW from waiting to the active queue).
Attempts to acquire a new SNW lock on t1,
sees an active SW lock (since it is present in the
active queue), adds ticket for SNW lock to the waiting
queue, sets m_waiting_for to point to this ticket.
At this point deadlock detection algorithm run by thread1 will see that:
- Thread1 waits for SNW lock on t1 (since m_waiting_for is set).
- SNW lock is not granted, because it conflicts with active SW lock
owned by thread 2 (since ticket for SW is present in granted queue).
- Thread2 waits for SW lock (since its m_waiting_for has not been
updated yet!).
- SW lock is not granted because there is pending SNW lock from thread1.
Therefore deadlock should exist [sic!].
To avoid detection of such false deadlocks we need to check the "actual"
status of the ticket being waited for, before analyzing its blockers.
We do this by checking the wait status of the context which is waiting
for it. To avoid races this has to be done under protection of
MDL_lock::m_rwlock lock.
*/
if (src_ctx->m_wait.get_status() != MDL_wait::EMPTY)
{
result= FALSE;
goto end;
}
/*
To avoid visiting nodes which were already marked as victims of
deadlock detection (or whose requests were already satisfied) we
enter the node only after peeking at its wait status.
This is necessary to avoid active waiting in a situation
when previous searches for a deadlock already selected the
node we're about to enter as a victim (see the comment
in MDL_context::find_deadlock() for explanation why several searches
can be performed for the same wait).
There is no guarantee that the node isn't chosen a victim while we
are visiting it but this is OK: in the worst case we might do some
extra work and one more context might be chosen as a victim.
*/
if (gvisitor->enter_node(src_ctx))
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
goto end;
/*
We do a breadth-first search first -- that is, inspect all
edges of the current node, and only then follow up to the next
node. In workloads that involve wait-for graph loops this
has proven to be a more efficient strategy [citation missing].
*/
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
while ((ticket= granted_it++))
{
/* Filter out edges that point to the same node. */
if (ticket->get_ctx() != src_ctx &&
ticket->is_incompatible_when_granted(waiting_ticket->get_type()) &&
gvisitor->inspect_edge(ticket->get_ctx()))
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
{
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
goto end_leave_node;
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
}
}
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
while ((ticket= waiting_it++))
{
/* Filter out edges that point to the same node. */
if (ticket->get_ctx() != src_ctx &&
ticket->is_incompatible_when_waiting(waiting_ticket->get_type()) &&
gvisitor->inspect_edge(ticket->get_ctx()))
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
{
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
goto end_leave_node;
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
}
}
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
/* Recurse and inspect all adjacent nodes. */
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
granted_it.rewind();
while ((ticket= granted_it++))
{
if (ticket->get_ctx() != src_ctx &&
ticket->is_incompatible_when_granted(waiting_ticket->get_type()) &&
ticket->get_ctx()->visit_subgraph(gvisitor))
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
{
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
goto end_leave_node;
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
}
}
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
waiting_it.rewind();
while ((ticket= waiting_it++))
{
if (ticket->get_ctx() != src_ctx &&
ticket->is_incompatible_when_waiting(waiting_ticket->get_type()) &&
ticket->get_ctx()->visit_subgraph(gvisitor))
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
{
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
goto end_leave_node;
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
}
}
result= FALSE;
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
end_leave_node:
gvisitor->leave_node(src_ctx);
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
end:
mysql_prlock_unlock(&m_rwlock);
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
return result;
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
}
/**
Traverse a portion of wait-for graph which is reachable
through the edge represented by this ticket and search
for deadlocks.
@retval TRUE A deadlock is found. A pointer to deadlock
victim is saved in the visitor.
@retval FALSE
*/
bool MDL_ticket::accept_visitor(MDL_wait_for_graph_visitor *gvisitor)
Fix for bug #52044 "FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK and FLUSH TABLES <list> WITH READ LOCK are incompatible". The problem was that FLUSH TABLES <list> WITH READ LOCK which was issued when other connection has acquired global read lock using FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK was blocked and has to wait until global read lock is released. This issue stemmed from the fact that FLUSH TABLES <list> WITH READ LOCK implementation has acquired X metadata locks on tables to be flushed. Since these locks required acquiring of global IX lock this statement was incompatible with global read lock. This patch addresses problem by using SNW metadata type of lock for tables to be flushed by FLUSH TABLES <list> WITH READ LOCK. It is OK to acquire them without global IX lock as long as we won't try to upgrade those locks. Since SNW locks allow concurrent statements using same table FLUSH TABLE <list> WITH READ LOCK now has to wait until old versions of tables to be flushed go away after acquiring metadata locks. Since such waiting can lead to deadlock MDL deadlock detector was extended to take into account waits for flush and resolve such deadlocks. As a bonus code in open_tables() which was responsible for waiting old versions of tables to go away was refactored. Now when we encounter old version of table in open_table() we don't back-off and wait for all old version to go away, but instead wait for this particular table to be flushed. Such approach supported by deadlock detection should reduce number of scenarios in which FLUSH TABLES aborts concurrent multi-statement transactions. Note that active FLUSH TABLES <list> WITH READ LOCK still blocks concurrent FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statement as the former keeps tables open and thus prevents the latter statement from doing flush.
2010-07-27 17:34:58 +04:00
{
return m_lock->visit_subgraph(this, gvisitor);
Fix for bug #52044 "FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK and FLUSH TABLES <list> WITH READ LOCK are incompatible". The problem was that FLUSH TABLES <list> WITH READ LOCK which was issued when other connection has acquired global read lock using FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK was blocked and has to wait until global read lock is released. This issue stemmed from the fact that FLUSH TABLES <list> WITH READ LOCK implementation has acquired X metadata locks on tables to be flushed. Since these locks required acquiring of global IX lock this statement was incompatible with global read lock. This patch addresses problem by using SNW metadata type of lock for tables to be flushed by FLUSH TABLES <list> WITH READ LOCK. It is OK to acquire them without global IX lock as long as we won't try to upgrade those locks. Since SNW locks allow concurrent statements using same table FLUSH TABLE <list> WITH READ LOCK now has to wait until old versions of tables to be flushed go away after acquiring metadata locks. Since such waiting can lead to deadlock MDL deadlock detector was extended to take into account waits for flush and resolve such deadlocks. As a bonus code in open_tables() which was responsible for waiting old versions of tables to go away was refactored. Now when we encounter old version of table in open_table() we don't back-off and wait for all old version to go away, but instead wait for this particular table to be flushed. Such approach supported by deadlock detection should reduce number of scenarios in which FLUSH TABLES aborts concurrent multi-statement transactions. Note that active FLUSH TABLES <list> WITH READ LOCK still blocks concurrent FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statement as the former keeps tables open and thus prevents the latter statement from doing flush.
2010-07-27 17:34:58 +04:00
}
/**
A fragment of recursive traversal of the wait-for graph of
MDL contexts in the server in search for deadlocks.
Assume this MDL context is a node in the wait-for graph,
and direct the visitor to all adjacent nodes. As long
as the starting node is remembered in the visitor, a
deadlock is found when the same node is visited twice.
One MDL context is connected to another in the wait-for
graph if it waits on a resource that is held by the other
context.
@retval TRUE A deadlock is found. A pointer to deadlock
victim is saved in the visitor.
@retval FALSE
*/
bool MDL_context::visit_subgraph(MDL_wait_for_graph_visitor *gvisitor)
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
{
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
bool result= FALSE;
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
mysql_prlock_rdlock(&m_LOCK_waiting_for);
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
if (m_waiting_for)
result= m_waiting_for->accept_visitor(gvisitor);
mysql_prlock_unlock(&m_LOCK_waiting_for);
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
return result;
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
}
/**
Try to find a deadlock. This function produces no errors.
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
@note If during deadlock resolution context which performs deadlock
detection is chosen as a victim it will be informed about the
fact by setting VICTIM status to its wait slot.
@retval TRUE A deadlock is found.
@retval FALSE No deadlock found.
*/
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
void MDL_context::find_deadlock()
Implementation of simple deadlock detection for metadata locks. This change is supposed to reduce number of ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK errors which occur when multi-statement transaction encounters conflicting metadata lock in cases when waiting is possible. The idea is not to fail ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error immediately when we encounter conflicting metadata lock. Instead we release all metadata locks acquired by current statement and start to wait until conflicting lock go away. To avoid deadlocks we use simple empiric which aborts waiting with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error if it turns out that somebody is waiting for metadata locks owned by this transaction. This patch also fixes bug #46273 "MySQL 5.4.4 new MDL: Bug#989 is not fully fixed in case of ALTER". The bug was that concurrent execution of UPDATE or MULTI-UPDATE statement as a part of multi-statement transaction that already has used table being updated and ALTER TABLE statement might have resulted of loss of isolation between this transaction and ALTER TABLE statement, which manifested itself as changes performed by ALTER TABLE becoming visible in transaction and wrong binary log order as a consequence. This problem occurred when UPDATE or MULTI-UPDATE's wait in mysql_lock_tables() call was aborted due to metadata lock upgrade performed by concurrent ALTER TABLE. After such abort all metadata locks held by transaction were released but transaction silently continued to be executed as if nothing has happened. We solve this problem by changing our code not to release all locks in such case. Instead we release only locks which were acquired by current statement and then try to reacquire them by restarting open/lock tables process. We piggyback on simple deadlock detector implementation since this change has to be done anyway for it.
2009-12-30 20:53:30 +03:00
{
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
while (1)
Implementation of simple deadlock detection for metadata locks. This change is supposed to reduce number of ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK errors which occur when multi-statement transaction encounters conflicting metadata lock in cases when waiting is possible. The idea is not to fail ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error immediately when we encounter conflicting metadata lock. Instead we release all metadata locks acquired by current statement and start to wait until conflicting lock go away. To avoid deadlocks we use simple empiric which aborts waiting with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error if it turns out that somebody is waiting for metadata locks owned by this transaction. This patch also fixes bug #46273 "MySQL 5.4.4 new MDL: Bug#989 is not fully fixed in case of ALTER". The bug was that concurrent execution of UPDATE or MULTI-UPDATE statement as a part of multi-statement transaction that already has used table being updated and ALTER TABLE statement might have resulted of loss of isolation between this transaction and ALTER TABLE statement, which manifested itself as changes performed by ALTER TABLE becoming visible in transaction and wrong binary log order as a consequence. This problem occurred when UPDATE or MULTI-UPDATE's wait in mysql_lock_tables() call was aborted due to metadata lock upgrade performed by concurrent ALTER TABLE. After such abort all metadata locks held by transaction were released but transaction silently continued to be executed as if nothing has happened. We solve this problem by changing our code not to release all locks in such case. Instead we release only locks which were acquired by current statement and then try to reacquire them by restarting open/lock tables process. We piggyback on simple deadlock detector implementation since this change has to be done anyway for it.
2009-12-30 20:53:30 +03:00
{
/*
The fact that we use fresh instance of gvisitor for each
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
search performed by find_deadlock() below is important,
the code responsible for victim selection relies on this.
*/
Deadlock_detection_visitor dvisitor(this);
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
MDL_context *victim;
if (! visit_subgraph(&dvisitor))
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
{
/* No deadlocks are found! */
break;
}
Implementation of simple deadlock detection for metadata locks. This change is supposed to reduce number of ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK errors which occur when multi-statement transaction encounters conflicting metadata lock in cases when waiting is possible. The idea is not to fail ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error immediately when we encounter conflicting metadata lock. Instead we release all metadata locks acquired by current statement and start to wait until conflicting lock go away. To avoid deadlocks we use simple empiric which aborts waiting with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error if it turns out that somebody is waiting for metadata locks owned by this transaction. This patch also fixes bug #46273 "MySQL 5.4.4 new MDL: Bug#989 is not fully fixed in case of ALTER". The bug was that concurrent execution of UPDATE or MULTI-UPDATE statement as a part of multi-statement transaction that already has used table being updated and ALTER TABLE statement might have resulted of loss of isolation between this transaction and ALTER TABLE statement, which manifested itself as changes performed by ALTER TABLE becoming visible in transaction and wrong binary log order as a consequence. This problem occurred when UPDATE or MULTI-UPDATE's wait in mysql_lock_tables() call was aborted due to metadata lock upgrade performed by concurrent ALTER TABLE. After such abort all metadata locks held by transaction were released but transaction silently continued to be executed as if nothing has happened. We solve this problem by changing our code not to release all locks in such case. Instead we release only locks which were acquired by current statement and then try to reacquire them by restarting open/lock tables process. We piggyback on simple deadlock detector implementation since this change has to be done anyway for it.
2009-12-30 20:53:30 +03:00
victim= dvisitor.get_victim();
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
/*
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
Failure to change status of the victim is OK as it means
that the victim has received some other message and is
about to stop its waiting/to break deadlock loop.
Even when the initiator of the deadlock search is
chosen the victim, we need to set the respective wait
result in order to "close" it for any attempt to
schedule the request.
This is needed to avoid a possible race during
cleanup in case when the lock request on which the
context was waiting is concurrently satisfied.
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
*/
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
(void) victim->m_wait.set_status(MDL_wait::VICTIM);
victim->unlock_deadlock_victim();
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
if (victim == this)
break;
/*
After adding a new edge to the waiting graph we found that it
creates a loop (i.e. there is a deadlock). We decided to destroy
this loop by removing an edge, but not the one that we added.
Since this doesn't guarantee that all loops created by addition
of the new edge are destroyed, we have to repeat the search.
*/
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
}
}
/**
Release lock.
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
@param duration Lock duration.
@param ticket Ticket for lock to be released.
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
*/
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
void MDL_context::release_lock(enum_mdl_duration duration, MDL_ticket *ticket)
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
{
MDL_lock *lock= ticket->m_lock;
DBUG_ENTER("MDL_context::release_lock");
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
DBUG_PRINT("enter", ("db=%s name=%s", lock->key.db_name(),
lock->key.name()));
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
DBUG_ASSERT(this == ticket->get_ctx());
2010-02-02 02:22:16 +03:00
mysql_mutex_assert_not_owner(&LOCK_open);
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
lock->remove_ticket(&MDL_lock::m_granted, ticket);
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
m_tickets[duration].remove(ticket);
MDL_ticket::destroy(ticket);
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
DBUG_VOID_RETURN;
}
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
/**
Release lock with explicit duration.
@param ticket Ticket for lock to be released.
*/
void MDL_context::release_lock(MDL_ticket *ticket)
{
DBUG_ASSERT(ticket->m_duration == MDL_EXPLICIT);
release_lock(MDL_EXPLICIT, ticket);
}
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
/**
A prerequisite patch for the fix for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". Introduce a notion of a sentinel to MDL_context. A sentinel is a ticket that separates all tickets in the context into two groups: before and after it. Currently we can have (and need) only one designated sentinel -- it separates all locks taken by LOCK TABLE or HANDLER statement, which must survive COMMIT and ROLLBACK and all other locks, which must be released at COMMIT or ROLLBACK. The tricky part is maintaining the sentinel up to date when someone release its corresponding ticket. This can happen, e.g. if someone issues DROP TABLE under LOCK TABLES (generally, see all calls to release_all_locks_for_name()). MDL_context::release_ticket() is modified to take care of it. ****** A fix and a test case for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". An attempt to mix HANDLER SQL statements, which are transaction- agnostic, an open multi-statement transaction, and DDL against the involved tables (in a concurrent connection) could lead to a deadlock. The deadlock would occur when HANDLER OPEN or HANDLER READ would have to wait on a conflicting metadata lock. If the connection that issued HANDLER statement also had other metadata locks (say, acquired in scope of a transaction), a classical deadlock situation of mutual wait could occur. Incompatible change: entering LOCK TABLES mode automatically closes all open HANDLERs in the current connection. Incompatible change: previously an attempt to wait on a lock in a connection that has an open HANDLER statement could wait indefinitely/deadlock. After this patch, an error ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK is produced. The idea of the fix is to merge thd->handler_mdl_context with the main mdl_context of the connection, used for transactional locks. This makes deadlock detection possible, since all waits with locks are "visible" and available to analysis in a single MDL context of the connection. Since HANDLER locks and transactional locks have a different life cycle -- HANDLERs are explicitly open and closed, and so are HANDLER locks, explicitly acquired and released, whereas transactional locks "accumulate" till the end of a transaction and are released only with COMMIT, ROLLBACK and ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, a concept of "sentinel" was introduced to MDL_context. All locks, HANDLER and others, reside in the same linked list. However, a selected element of the list separates locks with different life cycle. HANDLER locks always reside at the end of the list, after the sentinel. Transactional locks are prepended to the beginning of the list, before the sentinel. Thus, ROLLBACK, COMMIT or ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, only release those locks that reside before the sentinel. HANDLER locks must be released explicitly as part of HANDLER CLOSE statement, or an implicit close. The same approach with sentinel is also employed for LOCK TABLES locks. Since HANDLER and LOCK TABLES statement has never worked together, the implementation is made simple and only maintains one sentinel, which is used either for HANDLER locks, or for LOCK TABLES locks.
2009-12-22 19:09:15 +03:00
Release all locks associated with the context. If the sentinel
is not NULL, do not release locks stored in the list after and
including the sentinel.
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
Statement and transactional locks are added to the beginning of
the corresponding lists, i.e. stored in reverse temporal order.
This allows to employ this function to:
A prerequisite patch for the fix for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". Introduce a notion of a sentinel to MDL_context. A sentinel is a ticket that separates all tickets in the context into two groups: before and after it. Currently we can have (and need) only one designated sentinel -- it separates all locks taken by LOCK TABLE or HANDLER statement, which must survive COMMIT and ROLLBACK and all other locks, which must be released at COMMIT or ROLLBACK. The tricky part is maintaining the sentinel up to date when someone release its corresponding ticket. This can happen, e.g. if someone issues DROP TABLE under LOCK TABLES (generally, see all calls to release_all_locks_for_name()). MDL_context::release_ticket() is modified to take care of it. ****** A fix and a test case for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". An attempt to mix HANDLER SQL statements, which are transaction- agnostic, an open multi-statement transaction, and DDL against the involved tables (in a concurrent connection) could lead to a deadlock. The deadlock would occur when HANDLER OPEN or HANDLER READ would have to wait on a conflicting metadata lock. If the connection that issued HANDLER statement also had other metadata locks (say, acquired in scope of a transaction), a classical deadlock situation of mutual wait could occur. Incompatible change: entering LOCK TABLES mode automatically closes all open HANDLERs in the current connection. Incompatible change: previously an attempt to wait on a lock in a connection that has an open HANDLER statement could wait indefinitely/deadlock. After this patch, an error ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK is produced. The idea of the fix is to merge thd->handler_mdl_context with the main mdl_context of the connection, used for transactional locks. This makes deadlock detection possible, since all waits with locks are "visible" and available to analysis in a single MDL context of the connection. Since HANDLER locks and transactional locks have a different life cycle -- HANDLERs are explicitly open and closed, and so are HANDLER locks, explicitly acquired and released, whereas transactional locks "accumulate" till the end of a transaction and are released only with COMMIT, ROLLBACK and ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, a concept of "sentinel" was introduced to MDL_context. All locks, HANDLER and others, reside in the same linked list. However, a selected element of the list separates locks with different life cycle. HANDLER locks always reside at the end of the list, after the sentinel. Transactional locks are prepended to the beginning of the list, before the sentinel. Thus, ROLLBACK, COMMIT or ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, only release those locks that reside before the sentinel. HANDLER locks must be released explicitly as part of HANDLER CLOSE statement, or an implicit close. The same approach with sentinel is also employed for LOCK TABLES locks. Since HANDLER and LOCK TABLES statement has never worked together, the implementation is made simple and only maintains one sentinel, which is used either for HANDLER locks, or for LOCK TABLES locks.
2009-12-22 19:09:15 +03:00
- back off in case of a lock conflict.
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
- release all locks in the end of a statment or transaction
A prerequisite patch for the fix for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". Introduce a notion of a sentinel to MDL_context. A sentinel is a ticket that separates all tickets in the context into two groups: before and after it. Currently we can have (and need) only one designated sentinel -- it separates all locks taken by LOCK TABLE or HANDLER statement, which must survive COMMIT and ROLLBACK and all other locks, which must be released at COMMIT or ROLLBACK. The tricky part is maintaining the sentinel up to date when someone release its corresponding ticket. This can happen, e.g. if someone issues DROP TABLE under LOCK TABLES (generally, see all calls to release_all_locks_for_name()). MDL_context::release_ticket() is modified to take care of it. ****** A fix and a test case for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". An attempt to mix HANDLER SQL statements, which are transaction- agnostic, an open multi-statement transaction, and DDL against the involved tables (in a concurrent connection) could lead to a deadlock. The deadlock would occur when HANDLER OPEN or HANDLER READ would have to wait on a conflicting metadata lock. If the connection that issued HANDLER statement also had other metadata locks (say, acquired in scope of a transaction), a classical deadlock situation of mutual wait could occur. Incompatible change: entering LOCK TABLES mode automatically closes all open HANDLERs in the current connection. Incompatible change: previously an attempt to wait on a lock in a connection that has an open HANDLER statement could wait indefinitely/deadlock. After this patch, an error ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK is produced. The idea of the fix is to merge thd->handler_mdl_context with the main mdl_context of the connection, used for transactional locks. This makes deadlock detection possible, since all waits with locks are "visible" and available to analysis in a single MDL context of the connection. Since HANDLER locks and transactional locks have a different life cycle -- HANDLERs are explicitly open and closed, and so are HANDLER locks, explicitly acquired and released, whereas transactional locks "accumulate" till the end of a transaction and are released only with COMMIT, ROLLBACK and ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, a concept of "sentinel" was introduced to MDL_context. All locks, HANDLER and others, reside in the same linked list. However, a selected element of the list separates locks with different life cycle. HANDLER locks always reside at the end of the list, after the sentinel. Transactional locks are prepended to the beginning of the list, before the sentinel. Thus, ROLLBACK, COMMIT or ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, only release those locks that reside before the sentinel. HANDLER locks must be released explicitly as part of HANDLER CLOSE statement, or an implicit close. The same approach with sentinel is also employed for LOCK TABLES locks. Since HANDLER and LOCK TABLES statement has never worked together, the implementation is made simple and only maintains one sentinel, which is used either for HANDLER locks, or for LOCK TABLES locks.
2009-12-22 19:09:15 +03:00
- rollback to a savepoint.
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
*/
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
void MDL_context::release_locks_stored_before(enum_mdl_duration duration,
MDL_ticket *sentinel)
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
{
MDL_ticket *ticket;
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
Ticket_iterator it(m_tickets[duration]);
A prerequisite patch for the fix for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". Introduce a notion of a sentinel to MDL_context. A sentinel is a ticket that separates all tickets in the context into two groups: before and after it. Currently we can have (and need) only one designated sentinel -- it separates all locks taken by LOCK TABLE or HANDLER statement, which must survive COMMIT and ROLLBACK and all other locks, which must be released at COMMIT or ROLLBACK. The tricky part is maintaining the sentinel up to date when someone release its corresponding ticket. This can happen, e.g. if someone issues DROP TABLE under LOCK TABLES (generally, see all calls to release_all_locks_for_name()). MDL_context::release_ticket() is modified to take care of it. ****** A fix and a test case for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". An attempt to mix HANDLER SQL statements, which are transaction- agnostic, an open multi-statement transaction, and DDL against the involved tables (in a concurrent connection) could lead to a deadlock. The deadlock would occur when HANDLER OPEN or HANDLER READ would have to wait on a conflicting metadata lock. If the connection that issued HANDLER statement also had other metadata locks (say, acquired in scope of a transaction), a classical deadlock situation of mutual wait could occur. Incompatible change: entering LOCK TABLES mode automatically closes all open HANDLERs in the current connection. Incompatible change: previously an attempt to wait on a lock in a connection that has an open HANDLER statement could wait indefinitely/deadlock. After this patch, an error ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK is produced. The idea of the fix is to merge thd->handler_mdl_context with the main mdl_context of the connection, used for transactional locks. This makes deadlock detection possible, since all waits with locks are "visible" and available to analysis in a single MDL context of the connection. Since HANDLER locks and transactional locks have a different life cycle -- HANDLERs are explicitly open and closed, and so are HANDLER locks, explicitly acquired and released, whereas transactional locks "accumulate" till the end of a transaction and are released only with COMMIT, ROLLBACK and ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, a concept of "sentinel" was introduced to MDL_context. All locks, HANDLER and others, reside in the same linked list. However, a selected element of the list separates locks with different life cycle. HANDLER locks always reside at the end of the list, after the sentinel. Transactional locks are prepended to the beginning of the list, before the sentinel. Thus, ROLLBACK, COMMIT or ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, only release those locks that reside before the sentinel. HANDLER locks must be released explicitly as part of HANDLER CLOSE statement, or an implicit close. The same approach with sentinel is also employed for LOCK TABLES locks. Since HANDLER and LOCK TABLES statement has never worked together, the implementation is made simple and only maintains one sentinel, which is used either for HANDLER locks, or for LOCK TABLES locks.
2009-12-22 19:09:15 +03:00
DBUG_ENTER("MDL_context::release_locks_stored_before");
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
if (m_tickets[duration].is_empty())
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
DBUG_VOID_RETURN;
A prerequisite patch for the fix for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". Introduce a notion of a sentinel to MDL_context. A sentinel is a ticket that separates all tickets in the context into two groups: before and after it. Currently we can have (and need) only one designated sentinel -- it separates all locks taken by LOCK TABLE or HANDLER statement, which must survive COMMIT and ROLLBACK and all other locks, which must be released at COMMIT or ROLLBACK. The tricky part is maintaining the sentinel up to date when someone release its corresponding ticket. This can happen, e.g. if someone issues DROP TABLE under LOCK TABLES (generally, see all calls to release_all_locks_for_name()). MDL_context::release_ticket() is modified to take care of it. ****** A fix and a test case for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". An attempt to mix HANDLER SQL statements, which are transaction- agnostic, an open multi-statement transaction, and DDL against the involved tables (in a concurrent connection) could lead to a deadlock. The deadlock would occur when HANDLER OPEN or HANDLER READ would have to wait on a conflicting metadata lock. If the connection that issued HANDLER statement also had other metadata locks (say, acquired in scope of a transaction), a classical deadlock situation of mutual wait could occur. Incompatible change: entering LOCK TABLES mode automatically closes all open HANDLERs in the current connection. Incompatible change: previously an attempt to wait on a lock in a connection that has an open HANDLER statement could wait indefinitely/deadlock. After this patch, an error ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK is produced. The idea of the fix is to merge thd->handler_mdl_context with the main mdl_context of the connection, used for transactional locks. This makes deadlock detection possible, since all waits with locks are "visible" and available to analysis in a single MDL context of the connection. Since HANDLER locks and transactional locks have a different life cycle -- HANDLERs are explicitly open and closed, and so are HANDLER locks, explicitly acquired and released, whereas transactional locks "accumulate" till the end of a transaction and are released only with COMMIT, ROLLBACK and ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, a concept of "sentinel" was introduced to MDL_context. All locks, HANDLER and others, reside in the same linked list. However, a selected element of the list separates locks with different life cycle. HANDLER locks always reside at the end of the list, after the sentinel. Transactional locks are prepended to the beginning of the list, before the sentinel. Thus, ROLLBACK, COMMIT or ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, only release those locks that reside before the sentinel. HANDLER locks must be released explicitly as part of HANDLER CLOSE statement, or an implicit close. The same approach with sentinel is also employed for LOCK TABLES locks. Since HANDLER and LOCK TABLES statement has never worked together, the implementation is made simple and only maintains one sentinel, which is used either for HANDLER locks, or for LOCK TABLES locks.
2009-12-22 19:09:15 +03:00
while ((ticket= it++) && ticket != sentinel)
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
{
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
DBUG_PRINT("info", ("found lock to release ticket=%p", ticket));
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
release_lock(duration, ticket);
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
}
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
DBUG_VOID_RETURN;
}
/**
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
Release all explicit locks in the context which correspond to the
same name/object as this lock request.
@param ticket One of the locks for the name/object for which all
locks should be released.
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
*/
void MDL_context::release_all_locks_for_name(MDL_ticket *name)
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
{
/* Use MDL_ticket::m_lock to identify other locks for the same object. */
MDL_lock *lock= name->m_lock;
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
/* Remove matching lock tickets from the context. */
MDL_ticket *ticket;
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
Ticket_iterator it_ticket(m_tickets[MDL_EXPLICIT]);
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
while ((ticket= it_ticket++))
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
{
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
DBUG_ASSERT(ticket->m_lock);
if (ticket->m_lock == lock)
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
release_lock(MDL_EXPLICIT, ticket);
}
}
/**
Downgrade an exclusive lock to shared metadata lock.
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
@param type Type of lock to which exclusive lock should be downgraded.
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
*/
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
void MDL_ticket::downgrade_exclusive_lock(enum_mdl_type type)
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
{
2010-02-02 02:22:16 +03:00
mysql_mutex_assert_not_owner(&LOCK_open);
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
/*
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
Do nothing if already downgraded. Used when we FLUSH TABLE under
LOCK TABLES and a table is listed twice in LOCK TABLES list.
*/
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
if (m_type != MDL_EXCLUSIVE)
return;
mysql_prlock_wrlock(&m_lock->m_rwlock);
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
/*
To update state of MDL_lock object correctly we need to temporarily
exclude ticket from the granted queue and then include it back.
*/
m_lock->m_granted.remove_ticket(this);
m_type= type;
m_lock->m_granted.add_ticket(this);
Patch that changes approach to how we acquire metadata locks for DML statements and changes the way MDL locks are acquired/granted in contended case. Instead of backing-off when a lock conflict is encountered and waiting for it to go away before restarting open_tables() process we now wait for lock to be released without releasing any previously acquired locks. If conflicting lock goes away we resume opening tables. If waiting leads to a deadlock we try to resolve it by backing-off and restarting open_tables() immediately. As result both waiting for possibility to acquire and acquiring of a metadata lock now always happen within the same MDL API call. This has allowed to make release of a lock and granting it to the most appropriate pending request an atomic operation. Thanks to this it became possible to wake up during release of lock only those waiters which requests can be satisfied at the moment as well as wake up only one waiter in case when granting its request would prevent all other requests from being satisfied. This solves thundering herd problem which occured in cases when we were releasing some lock and woke up many waiters for SNRW or X locks (this was the issue in bug#52289 "performance regression for MyISAM in sysbench OLTP_RW test". This also allowed to implement more fair (FIFO) scheduling among waiters with the same priority. It also opens the door for introducing new types of requests for metadata locks such as low-prio SNRW lock which is necessary in order to support LOCK TABLES LOW_PRIORITY WRITE. Notice that after this sometimes can report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error in cases in which it has not happened before. Particularly we will always report this error if waiting for conflicting lock has happened in the middle of transaction and resulted in a deadlock. Before this patch the error was not reported if deadlock could have been resolved by backing off all metadata locks acquired by the current statement.
2010-06-07 11:06:55 +04:00
m_lock->reschedule_waiters();
mysql_prlock_unlock(&m_lock->m_rwlock);
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
}
/**
Auxiliary function which allows to check if we have some kind of lock on
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
a object. Returns TRUE if we have a lock of a given or stronger type.
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
@param mdl_namespace Id of object namespace
@param db Name of the database
@param name Name of the object
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
@param mdl_type Lock type. Pass in the weakest type to find
out if there is at least some lock.
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
@return TRUE if current context contains satisfied lock for the object,
FALSE otherwise.
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
*/
bool
MDL_context::is_lock_owner(MDL_key::enum_mdl_namespace mdl_namespace,
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
const char *db, const char *name,
enum_mdl_type mdl_type)
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
{
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
MDL_request mdl_request;
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
enum_mdl_duration not_unused;
/* We don't care about exact duration of lock here. */
mdl_request.init(mdl_namespace, db, name, mdl_type, MDL_TRANSACTION);
MDL_ticket *ticket= find_ticket(&mdl_request, &not_unused);
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
DBUG_ASSERT(ticket == NULL || ticket->m_lock);
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
return ticket;
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
}
/**
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
Check if we have any pending locks which conflict with existing shared lock.
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
@pre The ticket must match an acquired lock.
Implementation of simple deadlock detection for metadata locks. This change is supposed to reduce number of ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK errors which occur when multi-statement transaction encounters conflicting metadata lock in cases when waiting is possible. The idea is not to fail ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error immediately when we encounter conflicting metadata lock. Instead we release all metadata locks acquired by current statement and start to wait until conflicting lock go away. To avoid deadlocks we use simple empiric which aborts waiting with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error if it turns out that somebody is waiting for metadata locks owned by this transaction. This patch also fixes bug #46273 "MySQL 5.4.4 new MDL: Bug#989 is not fully fixed in case of ALTER". The bug was that concurrent execution of UPDATE or MULTI-UPDATE statement as a part of multi-statement transaction that already has used table being updated and ALTER TABLE statement might have resulted of loss of isolation between this transaction and ALTER TABLE statement, which manifested itself as changes performed by ALTER TABLE becoming visible in transaction and wrong binary log order as a consequence. This problem occurred when UPDATE or MULTI-UPDATE's wait in mysql_lock_tables() call was aborted due to metadata lock upgrade performed by concurrent ALTER TABLE. After such abort all metadata locks held by transaction were released but transaction silently continued to be executed as if nothing has happened. We solve this problem by changing our code not to release all locks in such case. Instead we release only locks which were acquired by current statement and then try to reacquire them by restarting open/lock tables process. We piggyback on simple deadlock detector implementation since this change has to be done anyway for it.
2009-12-30 20:53:30 +03:00
@return TRUE if there is a conflicting lock request, FALSE otherwise.
*/
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
bool MDL_ticket::has_pending_conflicting_lock() const
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
{
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
return m_lock->has_pending_conflicting_lock(m_type);
Initial import of WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.1 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No significant changes in the locking protocol. The import passes the test suite with the exception of deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter are subject to a fix by WL#4144. Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge, thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments. This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks". Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change: Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that was not locked for WRITE. Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or VIEW that was not locked for WRITE. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.2 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". After review fixes in progress. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.3 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.4 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections to close this table. These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code in this case assumed that temporary table representing new version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't always fulfilling this. This patch changes code that opens new version of table to always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table open. ****** WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects" Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore. ****** Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2630.4.6 committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com> branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400 message: WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects". Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by changes for this worklog. Make sure we close the new table only once.
2009-11-30 18:55:03 +03:00
}
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
/**
Releases metadata locks that were acquired after a specific savepoint.
@note Used to release tickets acquired during a savepoint unit.
@note It's safe to iterate and unlock any locks after taken after this
savepoint because other statements that take other special locks
cause a implicit commit (ie LOCK TABLES).
*/
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
void MDL_context::rollback_to_savepoint(const MDL_savepoint &mdl_savepoint)
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
{
DBUG_ENTER("MDL_context::rollback_to_savepoint");
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
A prerequisite patch for the fix for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". Introduce a notion of a sentinel to MDL_context. A sentinel is a ticket that separates all tickets in the context into two groups: before and after it. Currently we can have (and need) only one designated sentinel -- it separates all locks taken by LOCK TABLE or HANDLER statement, which must survive COMMIT and ROLLBACK and all other locks, which must be released at COMMIT or ROLLBACK. The tricky part is maintaining the sentinel up to date when someone release its corresponding ticket. This can happen, e.g. if someone issues DROP TABLE under LOCK TABLES (generally, see all calls to release_all_locks_for_name()). MDL_context::release_ticket() is modified to take care of it. ****** A fix and a test case for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". An attempt to mix HANDLER SQL statements, which are transaction- agnostic, an open multi-statement transaction, and DDL against the involved tables (in a concurrent connection) could lead to a deadlock. The deadlock would occur when HANDLER OPEN or HANDLER READ would have to wait on a conflicting metadata lock. If the connection that issued HANDLER statement also had other metadata locks (say, acquired in scope of a transaction), a classical deadlock situation of mutual wait could occur. Incompatible change: entering LOCK TABLES mode automatically closes all open HANDLERs in the current connection. Incompatible change: previously an attempt to wait on a lock in a connection that has an open HANDLER statement could wait indefinitely/deadlock. After this patch, an error ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK is produced. The idea of the fix is to merge thd->handler_mdl_context with the main mdl_context of the connection, used for transactional locks. This makes deadlock detection possible, since all waits with locks are "visible" and available to analysis in a single MDL context of the connection. Since HANDLER locks and transactional locks have a different life cycle -- HANDLERs are explicitly open and closed, and so are HANDLER locks, explicitly acquired and released, whereas transactional locks "accumulate" till the end of a transaction and are released only with COMMIT, ROLLBACK and ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, a concept of "sentinel" was introduced to MDL_context. All locks, HANDLER and others, reside in the same linked list. However, a selected element of the list separates locks with different life cycle. HANDLER locks always reside at the end of the list, after the sentinel. Transactional locks are prepended to the beginning of the list, before the sentinel. Thus, ROLLBACK, COMMIT or ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, only release those locks that reside before the sentinel. HANDLER locks must be released explicitly as part of HANDLER CLOSE statement, or an implicit close. The same approach with sentinel is also employed for LOCK TABLES locks. Since HANDLER and LOCK TABLES statement has never worked together, the implementation is made simple and only maintains one sentinel, which is used either for HANDLER locks, or for LOCK TABLES locks.
2009-12-22 19:09:15 +03:00
/* If savepoint is NULL, it is from the start of the transaction. */
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
release_locks_stored_before(MDL_STATEMENT, mdl_savepoint.m_stmt_ticket);
release_locks_stored_before(MDL_TRANSACTION, mdl_savepoint.m_trans_ticket);
A prerequisite patch for the fix for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". Introduce a notion of a sentinel to MDL_context. A sentinel is a ticket that separates all tickets in the context into two groups: before and after it. Currently we can have (and need) only one designated sentinel -- it separates all locks taken by LOCK TABLE or HANDLER statement, which must survive COMMIT and ROLLBACK and all other locks, which must be released at COMMIT or ROLLBACK. The tricky part is maintaining the sentinel up to date when someone release its corresponding ticket. This can happen, e.g. if someone issues DROP TABLE under LOCK TABLES (generally, see all calls to release_all_locks_for_name()). MDL_context::release_ticket() is modified to take care of it. ****** A fix and a test case for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". An attempt to mix HANDLER SQL statements, which are transaction- agnostic, an open multi-statement transaction, and DDL against the involved tables (in a concurrent connection) could lead to a deadlock. The deadlock would occur when HANDLER OPEN or HANDLER READ would have to wait on a conflicting metadata lock. If the connection that issued HANDLER statement also had other metadata locks (say, acquired in scope of a transaction), a classical deadlock situation of mutual wait could occur. Incompatible change: entering LOCK TABLES mode automatically closes all open HANDLERs in the current connection. Incompatible change: previously an attempt to wait on a lock in a connection that has an open HANDLER statement could wait indefinitely/deadlock. After this patch, an error ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK is produced. The idea of the fix is to merge thd->handler_mdl_context with the main mdl_context of the connection, used for transactional locks. This makes deadlock detection possible, since all waits with locks are "visible" and available to analysis in a single MDL context of the connection. Since HANDLER locks and transactional locks have a different life cycle -- HANDLERs are explicitly open and closed, and so are HANDLER locks, explicitly acquired and released, whereas transactional locks "accumulate" till the end of a transaction and are released only with COMMIT, ROLLBACK and ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, a concept of "sentinel" was introduced to MDL_context. All locks, HANDLER and others, reside in the same linked list. However, a selected element of the list separates locks with different life cycle. HANDLER locks always reside at the end of the list, after the sentinel. Transactional locks are prepended to the beginning of the list, before the sentinel. Thus, ROLLBACK, COMMIT or ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, only release those locks that reside before the sentinel. HANDLER locks must be released explicitly as part of HANDLER CLOSE statement, or an implicit close. The same approach with sentinel is also employed for LOCK TABLES locks. Since HANDLER and LOCK TABLES statement has never worked together, the implementation is made simple and only maintains one sentinel, which is used either for HANDLER locks, or for LOCK TABLES locks.
2009-12-22 19:09:15 +03:00
DBUG_VOID_RETURN;
}
/**
Release locks acquired by normal statements (SELECT, UPDATE,
DELETE, etc) in the course of a transaction. Do not release
HANDLER locks, if there are any.
This method is used at the end of a transaction, in
implementation of COMMIT (implicit or explicit) and ROLLBACK.
*/
void MDL_context::release_transactional_locks()
{
DBUG_ENTER("MDL_context::release_transactional_locks");
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
release_locks_stored_before(MDL_STATEMENT, NULL);
release_locks_stored_before(MDL_TRANSACTION, NULL);
DBUG_VOID_RETURN;
}
void MDL_context::release_statement_locks()
{
DBUG_ENTER("MDL_context::release_transactional_locks");
release_locks_stored_before(MDL_STATEMENT, NULL);
A prerequisite patch for the fix for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". Introduce a notion of a sentinel to MDL_context. A sentinel is a ticket that separates all tickets in the context into two groups: before and after it. Currently we can have (and need) only one designated sentinel -- it separates all locks taken by LOCK TABLE or HANDLER statement, which must survive COMMIT and ROLLBACK and all other locks, which must be released at COMMIT or ROLLBACK. The tricky part is maintaining the sentinel up to date when someone release its corresponding ticket. This can happen, e.g. if someone issues DROP TABLE under LOCK TABLES (generally, see all calls to release_all_locks_for_name()). MDL_context::release_ticket() is modified to take care of it. ****** A fix and a test case for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". An attempt to mix HANDLER SQL statements, which are transaction- agnostic, an open multi-statement transaction, and DDL against the involved tables (in a concurrent connection) could lead to a deadlock. The deadlock would occur when HANDLER OPEN or HANDLER READ would have to wait on a conflicting metadata lock. If the connection that issued HANDLER statement also had other metadata locks (say, acquired in scope of a transaction), a classical deadlock situation of mutual wait could occur. Incompatible change: entering LOCK TABLES mode automatically closes all open HANDLERs in the current connection. Incompatible change: previously an attempt to wait on a lock in a connection that has an open HANDLER statement could wait indefinitely/deadlock. After this patch, an error ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK is produced. The idea of the fix is to merge thd->handler_mdl_context with the main mdl_context of the connection, used for transactional locks. This makes deadlock detection possible, since all waits with locks are "visible" and available to analysis in a single MDL context of the connection. Since HANDLER locks and transactional locks have a different life cycle -- HANDLERs are explicitly open and closed, and so are HANDLER locks, explicitly acquired and released, whereas transactional locks "accumulate" till the end of a transaction and are released only with COMMIT, ROLLBACK and ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, a concept of "sentinel" was introduced to MDL_context. All locks, HANDLER and others, reside in the same linked list. However, a selected element of the list separates locks with different life cycle. HANDLER locks always reside at the end of the list, after the sentinel. Transactional locks are prepended to the beginning of the list, before the sentinel. Thus, ROLLBACK, COMMIT or ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, only release those locks that reside before the sentinel. HANDLER locks must be released explicitly as part of HANDLER CLOSE statement, or an implicit close. The same approach with sentinel is also employed for LOCK TABLES locks. Since HANDLER and LOCK TABLES statement has never worked together, the implementation is made simple and only maintains one sentinel, which is used either for HANDLER locks, or for LOCK TABLES locks.
2009-12-22 19:09:15 +03:00
DBUG_VOID_RETURN;
}
/**
Does this savepoint have this lock?
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
@retval TRUE The ticket is older than the savepoint or
is an LT, HA or GLR ticket. Thus it belongs
to the savepoint or has explicit duration.
@retval FALSE The ticket is newer than the savepoint.
and is not an LT, HA or GLR ticket.
A prerequisite patch for the fix for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". Introduce a notion of a sentinel to MDL_context. A sentinel is a ticket that separates all tickets in the context into two groups: before and after it. Currently we can have (and need) only one designated sentinel -- it separates all locks taken by LOCK TABLE or HANDLER statement, which must survive COMMIT and ROLLBACK and all other locks, which must be released at COMMIT or ROLLBACK. The tricky part is maintaining the sentinel up to date when someone release its corresponding ticket. This can happen, e.g. if someone issues DROP TABLE under LOCK TABLES (generally, see all calls to release_all_locks_for_name()). MDL_context::release_ticket() is modified to take care of it. ****** A fix and a test case for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". An attempt to mix HANDLER SQL statements, which are transaction- agnostic, an open multi-statement transaction, and DDL against the involved tables (in a concurrent connection) could lead to a deadlock. The deadlock would occur when HANDLER OPEN or HANDLER READ would have to wait on a conflicting metadata lock. If the connection that issued HANDLER statement also had other metadata locks (say, acquired in scope of a transaction), a classical deadlock situation of mutual wait could occur. Incompatible change: entering LOCK TABLES mode automatically closes all open HANDLERs in the current connection. Incompatible change: previously an attempt to wait on a lock in a connection that has an open HANDLER statement could wait indefinitely/deadlock. After this patch, an error ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK is produced. The idea of the fix is to merge thd->handler_mdl_context with the main mdl_context of the connection, used for transactional locks. This makes deadlock detection possible, since all waits with locks are "visible" and available to analysis in a single MDL context of the connection. Since HANDLER locks and transactional locks have a different life cycle -- HANDLERs are explicitly open and closed, and so are HANDLER locks, explicitly acquired and released, whereas transactional locks "accumulate" till the end of a transaction and are released only with COMMIT, ROLLBACK and ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, a concept of "sentinel" was introduced to MDL_context. All locks, HANDLER and others, reside in the same linked list. However, a selected element of the list separates locks with different life cycle. HANDLER locks always reside at the end of the list, after the sentinel. Transactional locks are prepended to the beginning of the list, before the sentinel. Thus, ROLLBACK, COMMIT or ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, only release those locks that reside before the sentinel. HANDLER locks must be released explicitly as part of HANDLER CLOSE statement, or an implicit close. The same approach with sentinel is also employed for LOCK TABLES locks. Since HANDLER and LOCK TABLES statement has never worked together, the implementation is made simple and only maintains one sentinel, which is used either for HANDLER locks, or for LOCK TABLES locks.
2009-12-22 19:09:15 +03:00
*/
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
bool MDL_context::has_lock(const MDL_savepoint &mdl_savepoint,
A prerequisite patch for the fix for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". Introduce a notion of a sentinel to MDL_context. A sentinel is a ticket that separates all tickets in the context into two groups: before and after it. Currently we can have (and need) only one designated sentinel -- it separates all locks taken by LOCK TABLE or HANDLER statement, which must survive COMMIT and ROLLBACK and all other locks, which must be released at COMMIT or ROLLBACK. The tricky part is maintaining the sentinel up to date when someone release its corresponding ticket. This can happen, e.g. if someone issues DROP TABLE under LOCK TABLES (generally, see all calls to release_all_locks_for_name()). MDL_context::release_ticket() is modified to take care of it. ****** A fix and a test case for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". An attempt to mix HANDLER SQL statements, which are transaction- agnostic, an open multi-statement transaction, and DDL against the involved tables (in a concurrent connection) could lead to a deadlock. The deadlock would occur when HANDLER OPEN or HANDLER READ would have to wait on a conflicting metadata lock. If the connection that issued HANDLER statement also had other metadata locks (say, acquired in scope of a transaction), a classical deadlock situation of mutual wait could occur. Incompatible change: entering LOCK TABLES mode automatically closes all open HANDLERs in the current connection. Incompatible change: previously an attempt to wait on a lock in a connection that has an open HANDLER statement could wait indefinitely/deadlock. After this patch, an error ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK is produced. The idea of the fix is to merge thd->handler_mdl_context with the main mdl_context of the connection, used for transactional locks. This makes deadlock detection possible, since all waits with locks are "visible" and available to analysis in a single MDL context of the connection. Since HANDLER locks and transactional locks have a different life cycle -- HANDLERs are explicitly open and closed, and so are HANDLER locks, explicitly acquired and released, whereas transactional locks "accumulate" till the end of a transaction and are released only with COMMIT, ROLLBACK and ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, a concept of "sentinel" was introduced to MDL_context. All locks, HANDLER and others, reside in the same linked list. However, a selected element of the list separates locks with different life cycle. HANDLER locks always reside at the end of the list, after the sentinel. Transactional locks are prepended to the beginning of the list, before the sentinel. Thus, ROLLBACK, COMMIT or ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, only release those locks that reside before the sentinel. HANDLER locks must be released explicitly as part of HANDLER CLOSE statement, or an implicit close. The same approach with sentinel is also employed for LOCK TABLES locks. Since HANDLER and LOCK TABLES statement has never worked together, the implementation is made simple and only maintains one sentinel, which is used either for HANDLER locks, or for LOCK TABLES locks.
2009-12-22 19:09:15 +03:00
MDL_ticket *mdl_ticket)
{
MDL_ticket *ticket;
Implement new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks. Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
2010-02-01 14:43:06 +03:00
/* Start from the beginning, most likely mdl_ticket's been just acquired. */
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
MDL_context::Ticket_iterator s_it(m_tickets[MDL_STATEMENT]);
MDL_context::Ticket_iterator t_it(m_tickets[MDL_TRANSACTION]);
A prerequisite patch for the fix for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". Introduce a notion of a sentinel to MDL_context. A sentinel is a ticket that separates all tickets in the context into two groups: before and after it. Currently we can have (and need) only one designated sentinel -- it separates all locks taken by LOCK TABLE or HANDLER statement, which must survive COMMIT and ROLLBACK and all other locks, which must be released at COMMIT or ROLLBACK. The tricky part is maintaining the sentinel up to date when someone release its corresponding ticket. This can happen, e.g. if someone issues DROP TABLE under LOCK TABLES (generally, see all calls to release_all_locks_for_name()). MDL_context::release_ticket() is modified to take care of it. ****** A fix and a test case for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". An attempt to mix HANDLER SQL statements, which are transaction- agnostic, an open multi-statement transaction, and DDL against the involved tables (in a concurrent connection) could lead to a deadlock. The deadlock would occur when HANDLER OPEN or HANDLER READ would have to wait on a conflicting metadata lock. If the connection that issued HANDLER statement also had other metadata locks (say, acquired in scope of a transaction), a classical deadlock situation of mutual wait could occur. Incompatible change: entering LOCK TABLES mode automatically closes all open HANDLERs in the current connection. Incompatible change: previously an attempt to wait on a lock in a connection that has an open HANDLER statement could wait indefinitely/deadlock. After this patch, an error ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK is produced. The idea of the fix is to merge thd->handler_mdl_context with the main mdl_context of the connection, used for transactional locks. This makes deadlock detection possible, since all waits with locks are "visible" and available to analysis in a single MDL context of the connection. Since HANDLER locks and transactional locks have a different life cycle -- HANDLERs are explicitly open and closed, and so are HANDLER locks, explicitly acquired and released, whereas transactional locks "accumulate" till the end of a transaction and are released only with COMMIT, ROLLBACK and ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, a concept of "sentinel" was introduced to MDL_context. All locks, HANDLER and others, reside in the same linked list. However, a selected element of the list separates locks with different life cycle. HANDLER locks always reside at the end of the list, after the sentinel. Transactional locks are prepended to the beginning of the list, before the sentinel. Thus, ROLLBACK, COMMIT or ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, only release those locks that reside before the sentinel. HANDLER locks must be released explicitly as part of HANDLER CLOSE statement, or an implicit close. The same approach with sentinel is also employed for LOCK TABLES locks. Since HANDLER and LOCK TABLES statement has never worked together, the implementation is made simple and only maintains one sentinel, which is used either for HANDLER locks, or for LOCK TABLES locks.
2009-12-22 19:09:15 +03:00
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
while ((ticket= s_it++) && ticket != mdl_savepoint.m_stmt_ticket)
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
{
A prerequisite patch for the fix for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". Introduce a notion of a sentinel to MDL_context. A sentinel is a ticket that separates all tickets in the context into two groups: before and after it. Currently we can have (and need) only one designated sentinel -- it separates all locks taken by LOCK TABLE or HANDLER statement, which must survive COMMIT and ROLLBACK and all other locks, which must be released at COMMIT or ROLLBACK. The tricky part is maintaining the sentinel up to date when someone release its corresponding ticket. This can happen, e.g. if someone issues DROP TABLE under LOCK TABLES (generally, see all calls to release_all_locks_for_name()). MDL_context::release_ticket() is modified to take care of it. ****** A fix and a test case for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". An attempt to mix HANDLER SQL statements, which are transaction- agnostic, an open multi-statement transaction, and DDL against the involved tables (in a concurrent connection) could lead to a deadlock. The deadlock would occur when HANDLER OPEN or HANDLER READ would have to wait on a conflicting metadata lock. If the connection that issued HANDLER statement also had other metadata locks (say, acquired in scope of a transaction), a classical deadlock situation of mutual wait could occur. Incompatible change: entering LOCK TABLES mode automatically closes all open HANDLERs in the current connection. Incompatible change: previously an attempt to wait on a lock in a connection that has an open HANDLER statement could wait indefinitely/deadlock. After this patch, an error ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK is produced. The idea of the fix is to merge thd->handler_mdl_context with the main mdl_context of the connection, used for transactional locks. This makes deadlock detection possible, since all waits with locks are "visible" and available to analysis in a single MDL context of the connection. Since HANDLER locks and transactional locks have a different life cycle -- HANDLERs are explicitly open and closed, and so are HANDLER locks, explicitly acquired and released, whereas transactional locks "accumulate" till the end of a transaction and are released only with COMMIT, ROLLBACK and ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, a concept of "sentinel" was introduced to MDL_context. All locks, HANDLER and others, reside in the same linked list. However, a selected element of the list separates locks with different life cycle. HANDLER locks always reside at the end of the list, after the sentinel. Transactional locks are prepended to the beginning of the list, before the sentinel. Thus, ROLLBACK, COMMIT or ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, only release those locks that reside before the sentinel. HANDLER locks must be released explicitly as part of HANDLER CLOSE statement, or an implicit close. The same approach with sentinel is also employed for LOCK TABLES locks. Since HANDLER and LOCK TABLES statement has never worked together, the implementation is made simple and only maintains one sentinel, which is used either for HANDLER locks, or for LOCK TABLES locks.
2009-12-22 19:09:15 +03:00
if (ticket == mdl_ticket)
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
return FALSE;
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
}
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
while ((ticket= t_it++) && ticket != mdl_savepoint.m_trans_ticket)
{
if (ticket == mdl_ticket)
return FALSE;
}
return TRUE;
}
/**
Change lock duration for transactional lock.
@param ticket Ticket representing lock.
@param duration Lock duration to be set.
@note This method only supports changing duration of
transactional lock to some other duration.
*/
void MDL_context::set_lock_duration(MDL_ticket *mdl_ticket,
enum_mdl_duration duration)
{
DBUG_ASSERT(mdl_ticket->m_duration == MDL_TRANSACTION &&
duration != MDL_TRANSACTION);
m_tickets[MDL_TRANSACTION].remove(mdl_ticket);
m_tickets[duration].push_front(mdl_ticket);
#ifndef DBUG_OFF
mdl_ticket->m_duration= duration;
#endif
Backport of: ------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 2617.23.18 committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM> branch nick: 4284-6.0 timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300 message: Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking This is a prerequisite patch: These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock requests, but only shared locks can be recursive. The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction. Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds a equivalent of the lock being released. These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys, requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once. This patch combines review input and significant code contributions from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
2009-12-04 02:29:40 +03:00
}
A prerequisite patch for the fix for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". Introduce a notion of a sentinel to MDL_context. A sentinel is a ticket that separates all tickets in the context into two groups: before and after it. Currently we can have (and need) only one designated sentinel -- it separates all locks taken by LOCK TABLE or HANDLER statement, which must survive COMMIT and ROLLBACK and all other locks, which must be released at COMMIT or ROLLBACK. The tricky part is maintaining the sentinel up to date when someone release its corresponding ticket. This can happen, e.g. if someone issues DROP TABLE under LOCK TABLES (generally, see all calls to release_all_locks_for_name()). MDL_context::release_ticket() is modified to take care of it. ****** A fix and a test case for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". An attempt to mix HANDLER SQL statements, which are transaction- agnostic, an open multi-statement transaction, and DDL against the involved tables (in a concurrent connection) could lead to a deadlock. The deadlock would occur when HANDLER OPEN or HANDLER READ would have to wait on a conflicting metadata lock. If the connection that issued HANDLER statement also had other metadata locks (say, acquired in scope of a transaction), a classical deadlock situation of mutual wait could occur. Incompatible change: entering LOCK TABLES mode automatically closes all open HANDLERs in the current connection. Incompatible change: previously an attempt to wait on a lock in a connection that has an open HANDLER statement could wait indefinitely/deadlock. After this patch, an error ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK is produced. The idea of the fix is to merge thd->handler_mdl_context with the main mdl_context of the connection, used for transactional locks. This makes deadlock detection possible, since all waits with locks are "visible" and available to analysis in a single MDL context of the connection. Since HANDLER locks and transactional locks have a different life cycle -- HANDLERs are explicitly open and closed, and so are HANDLER locks, explicitly acquired and released, whereas transactional locks "accumulate" till the end of a transaction and are released only with COMMIT, ROLLBACK and ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, a concept of "sentinel" was introduced to MDL_context. All locks, HANDLER and others, reside in the same linked list. However, a selected element of the list separates locks with different life cycle. HANDLER locks always reside at the end of the list, after the sentinel. Transactional locks are prepended to the beginning of the list, before the sentinel. Thus, ROLLBACK, COMMIT or ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, only release those locks that reside before the sentinel. HANDLER locks must be released explicitly as part of HANDLER CLOSE statement, or an implicit close. The same approach with sentinel is also employed for LOCK TABLES locks. Since HANDLER and LOCK TABLES statement has never worked together, the implementation is made simple and only maintains one sentinel, which is used either for HANDLER locks, or for LOCK TABLES locks.
2009-12-22 19:09:15 +03:00
/**
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
Set explicit duration for all locks in the context.
A prerequisite patch for the fix for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". Introduce a notion of a sentinel to MDL_context. A sentinel is a ticket that separates all tickets in the context into two groups: before and after it. Currently we can have (and need) only one designated sentinel -- it separates all locks taken by LOCK TABLE or HANDLER statement, which must survive COMMIT and ROLLBACK and all other locks, which must be released at COMMIT or ROLLBACK. The tricky part is maintaining the sentinel up to date when someone release its corresponding ticket. This can happen, e.g. if someone issues DROP TABLE under LOCK TABLES (generally, see all calls to release_all_locks_for_name()). MDL_context::release_ticket() is modified to take care of it. ****** A fix and a test case for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". An attempt to mix HANDLER SQL statements, which are transaction- agnostic, an open multi-statement transaction, and DDL against the involved tables (in a concurrent connection) could lead to a deadlock. The deadlock would occur when HANDLER OPEN or HANDLER READ would have to wait on a conflicting metadata lock. If the connection that issued HANDLER statement also had other metadata locks (say, acquired in scope of a transaction), a classical deadlock situation of mutual wait could occur. Incompatible change: entering LOCK TABLES mode automatically closes all open HANDLERs in the current connection. Incompatible change: previously an attempt to wait on a lock in a connection that has an open HANDLER statement could wait indefinitely/deadlock. After this patch, an error ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK is produced. The idea of the fix is to merge thd->handler_mdl_context with the main mdl_context of the connection, used for transactional locks. This makes deadlock detection possible, since all waits with locks are "visible" and available to analysis in a single MDL context of the connection. Since HANDLER locks and transactional locks have a different life cycle -- HANDLERs are explicitly open and closed, and so are HANDLER locks, explicitly acquired and released, whereas transactional locks "accumulate" till the end of a transaction and are released only with COMMIT, ROLLBACK and ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, a concept of "sentinel" was introduced to MDL_context. All locks, HANDLER and others, reside in the same linked list. However, a selected element of the list separates locks with different life cycle. HANDLER locks always reside at the end of the list, after the sentinel. Transactional locks are prepended to the beginning of the list, before the sentinel. Thus, ROLLBACK, COMMIT or ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, only release those locks that reside before the sentinel. HANDLER locks must be released explicitly as part of HANDLER CLOSE statement, or an implicit close. The same approach with sentinel is also employed for LOCK TABLES locks. Since HANDLER and LOCK TABLES statement has never worked together, the implementation is made simple and only maintains one sentinel, which is used either for HANDLER locks, or for LOCK TABLES locks.
2009-12-22 19:09:15 +03:00
*/
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
void MDL_context::set_explicit_duration_for_all_locks()
A prerequisite patch for the fix for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". Introduce a notion of a sentinel to MDL_context. A sentinel is a ticket that separates all tickets in the context into two groups: before and after it. Currently we can have (and need) only one designated sentinel -- it separates all locks taken by LOCK TABLE or HANDLER statement, which must survive COMMIT and ROLLBACK and all other locks, which must be released at COMMIT or ROLLBACK. The tricky part is maintaining the sentinel up to date when someone release its corresponding ticket. This can happen, e.g. if someone issues DROP TABLE under LOCK TABLES (generally, see all calls to release_all_locks_for_name()). MDL_context::release_ticket() is modified to take care of it. ****** A fix and a test case for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". An attempt to mix HANDLER SQL statements, which are transaction- agnostic, an open multi-statement transaction, and DDL against the involved tables (in a concurrent connection) could lead to a deadlock. The deadlock would occur when HANDLER OPEN or HANDLER READ would have to wait on a conflicting metadata lock. If the connection that issued HANDLER statement also had other metadata locks (say, acquired in scope of a transaction), a classical deadlock situation of mutual wait could occur. Incompatible change: entering LOCK TABLES mode automatically closes all open HANDLERs in the current connection. Incompatible change: previously an attempt to wait on a lock in a connection that has an open HANDLER statement could wait indefinitely/deadlock. After this patch, an error ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK is produced. The idea of the fix is to merge thd->handler_mdl_context with the main mdl_context of the connection, used for transactional locks. This makes deadlock detection possible, since all waits with locks are "visible" and available to analysis in a single MDL context of the connection. Since HANDLER locks and transactional locks have a different life cycle -- HANDLERs are explicitly open and closed, and so are HANDLER locks, explicitly acquired and released, whereas transactional locks "accumulate" till the end of a transaction and are released only with COMMIT, ROLLBACK and ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, a concept of "sentinel" was introduced to MDL_context. All locks, HANDLER and others, reside in the same linked list. However, a selected element of the list separates locks with different life cycle. HANDLER locks always reside at the end of the list, after the sentinel. Transactional locks are prepended to the beginning of the list, before the sentinel. Thus, ROLLBACK, COMMIT or ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, only release those locks that reside before the sentinel. HANDLER locks must be released explicitly as part of HANDLER CLOSE statement, or an implicit close. The same approach with sentinel is also employed for LOCK TABLES locks. Since HANDLER and LOCK TABLES statement has never worked together, the implementation is made simple and only maintains one sentinel, which is used either for HANDLER locks, or for LOCK TABLES locks.
2009-12-22 19:09:15 +03:00
{
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
int i;
MDL_ticket *ticket;
/*
In the most common case when this function is called list
of transactional locks is bigger than list of locks with
explicit duration. So we start by swapping these two lists
and then move elements from new list of transactional
locks and list of statement locks to list of locks with
explicit duration.
*/
m_tickets[MDL_EXPLICIT].swap(m_tickets[MDL_TRANSACTION]);
for (i= 0; i < MDL_EXPLICIT; i++)
A prerequisite patch for the fix for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". Introduce a notion of a sentinel to MDL_context. A sentinel is a ticket that separates all tickets in the context into two groups: before and after it. Currently we can have (and need) only one designated sentinel -- it separates all locks taken by LOCK TABLE or HANDLER statement, which must survive COMMIT and ROLLBACK and all other locks, which must be released at COMMIT or ROLLBACK. The tricky part is maintaining the sentinel up to date when someone release its corresponding ticket. This can happen, e.g. if someone issues DROP TABLE under LOCK TABLES (generally, see all calls to release_all_locks_for_name()). MDL_context::release_ticket() is modified to take care of it. ****** A fix and a test case for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". An attempt to mix HANDLER SQL statements, which are transaction- agnostic, an open multi-statement transaction, and DDL against the involved tables (in a concurrent connection) could lead to a deadlock. The deadlock would occur when HANDLER OPEN or HANDLER READ would have to wait on a conflicting metadata lock. If the connection that issued HANDLER statement also had other metadata locks (say, acquired in scope of a transaction), a classical deadlock situation of mutual wait could occur. Incompatible change: entering LOCK TABLES mode automatically closes all open HANDLERs in the current connection. Incompatible change: previously an attempt to wait on a lock in a connection that has an open HANDLER statement could wait indefinitely/deadlock. After this patch, an error ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK is produced. The idea of the fix is to merge thd->handler_mdl_context with the main mdl_context of the connection, used for transactional locks. This makes deadlock detection possible, since all waits with locks are "visible" and available to analysis in a single MDL context of the connection. Since HANDLER locks and transactional locks have a different life cycle -- HANDLERs are explicitly open and closed, and so are HANDLER locks, explicitly acquired and released, whereas transactional locks "accumulate" till the end of a transaction and are released only with COMMIT, ROLLBACK and ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, a concept of "sentinel" was introduced to MDL_context. All locks, HANDLER and others, reside in the same linked list. However, a selected element of the list separates locks with different life cycle. HANDLER locks always reside at the end of the list, after the sentinel. Transactional locks are prepended to the beginning of the list, before the sentinel. Thus, ROLLBACK, COMMIT or ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, only release those locks that reside before the sentinel. HANDLER locks must be released explicitly as part of HANDLER CLOSE statement, or an implicit close. The same approach with sentinel is also employed for LOCK TABLES locks. Since HANDLER and LOCK TABLES statement has never worked together, the implementation is made simple and only maintains one sentinel, which is used either for HANDLER locks, or for LOCK TABLES locks.
2009-12-22 19:09:15 +03:00
{
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
Ticket_iterator it_ticket(m_tickets[i]);
while ((ticket= it_ticket++))
{
m_tickets[i].remove(ticket);
m_tickets[MDL_EXPLICIT].push_front(ticket);
}
A prerequisite patch for the fix for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". Introduce a notion of a sentinel to MDL_context. A sentinel is a ticket that separates all tickets in the context into two groups: before and after it. Currently we can have (and need) only one designated sentinel -- it separates all locks taken by LOCK TABLE or HANDLER statement, which must survive COMMIT and ROLLBACK and all other locks, which must be released at COMMIT or ROLLBACK. The tricky part is maintaining the sentinel up to date when someone release its corresponding ticket. This can happen, e.g. if someone issues DROP TABLE under LOCK TABLES (generally, see all calls to release_all_locks_for_name()). MDL_context::release_ticket() is modified to take care of it. ****** A fix and a test case for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". An attempt to mix HANDLER SQL statements, which are transaction- agnostic, an open multi-statement transaction, and DDL against the involved tables (in a concurrent connection) could lead to a deadlock. The deadlock would occur when HANDLER OPEN or HANDLER READ would have to wait on a conflicting metadata lock. If the connection that issued HANDLER statement also had other metadata locks (say, acquired in scope of a transaction), a classical deadlock situation of mutual wait could occur. Incompatible change: entering LOCK TABLES mode automatically closes all open HANDLERs in the current connection. Incompatible change: previously an attempt to wait on a lock in a connection that has an open HANDLER statement could wait indefinitely/deadlock. After this patch, an error ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK is produced. The idea of the fix is to merge thd->handler_mdl_context with the main mdl_context of the connection, used for transactional locks. This makes deadlock detection possible, since all waits with locks are "visible" and available to analysis in a single MDL context of the connection. Since HANDLER locks and transactional locks have a different life cycle -- HANDLERs are explicitly open and closed, and so are HANDLER locks, explicitly acquired and released, whereas transactional locks "accumulate" till the end of a transaction and are released only with COMMIT, ROLLBACK and ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, a concept of "sentinel" was introduced to MDL_context. All locks, HANDLER and others, reside in the same linked list. However, a selected element of the list separates locks with different life cycle. HANDLER locks always reside at the end of the list, after the sentinel. Transactional locks are prepended to the beginning of the list, before the sentinel. Thus, ROLLBACK, COMMIT or ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, only release those locks that reside before the sentinel. HANDLER locks must be released explicitly as part of HANDLER CLOSE statement, or an implicit close. The same approach with sentinel is also employed for LOCK TABLES locks. Since HANDLER and LOCK TABLES statement has never worked together, the implementation is made simple and only maintains one sentinel, which is used either for HANDLER locks, or for LOCK TABLES locks.
2009-12-22 19:09:15 +03:00
}
Patch that refactors global read lock implementation and fixes bug #57006 "Deadlock between HANDLER and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK" and bug #54673 "It takes too long to get readlock for 'FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK'". The first bug manifested itself as a deadlock which occurred when a connection, which had some table open through HANDLER statement, tried to update some data through DML statement while another connection tried to execute FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK concurrently. What happened was that FTWRL in the second connection managed to perform first step of GRL acquisition and thus blocked all upcoming DML. After that it started to wait for table open through HANDLER statement to be flushed. When the first connection tried to execute DML it has started to wait for GRL/the second connection creating deadlock. The second bug manifested itself as starvation of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statements in cases when there was a constant stream of concurrent DML statements (in two or more connections). This has happened because requests for protection against GRL which were acquired by DML statements were ignoring presence of pending GRL and thus the latter was starved. This patch solves both these problems by re-implementing GRL using metadata locks. Similar to the old implementation acquisition of GRL in new implementation is two-step. During the first step we block all concurrent DML and DDL statements by acquiring global S metadata lock (each DML and DDL statement acquires global IX lock for its duration). During the second step we block commits by acquiring global S lock in COMMIT namespace (commit code acquires global IX lock in this namespace). Note that unlike in old implementation acquisition of protection against GRL in DML and DDL is semi-automatic. We assume that any statement which should be blocked by GRL will either open and acquires write-lock on tables or acquires metadata locks on objects it is going to modify. For any such statement global IX metadata lock is automatically acquired for its duration. The first problem is solved because waits for GRL become visible to deadlock detector in metadata locking subsystem and thus deadlocks like one in the first bug become impossible. The second problem is solved because global S locks which are used for GRL implementation are given preference over IX locks which are acquired by concurrent DML (and we can switch to fair scheduling in future if needed). Important change: FTWRL/GRL no longer blocks DML and DDL on temporary tables. Before this patch behavior was not consistent in this respect: in some cases DML/DDL statements on temporary tables were blocked while in others they were not. Since the main use cases for FTWRL are various forms of backups and temporary tables are not preserved during backups we have opted for consistently allowing DML/DDL on temporary tables during FTWRL/GRL. Important change: This patch changes thread state names which are used when DML/DDL of FTWRL is waiting for global read lock. It is now either "Waiting for global read lock" or "Waiting for commit lock" depending on the stage on which FTWRL is. Incompatible change: To solve deadlock in events code which was exposed by this patch we have to replace LOCK_event_metadata mutex with metadata locks on events. As result we have to prohibit DDL on events under LOCK TABLES. This patch also adds extensive test coverage for interaction of DML/DDL and FTWRL. Performance of new and old global read lock implementations in sysbench tests were compared. There were no significant difference between new and old implementations.
2010-11-11 20:11:05 +03:00
#ifndef DBUG_OFF
Ticket_iterator exp_it(m_tickets[MDL_EXPLICIT]);
while ((ticket= exp_it++))
ticket->m_duration= MDL_EXPLICIT;
#endif
}
/**
Set transactional duration for all locks in the context.
*/
void MDL_context::set_transaction_duration_for_all_locks()
{
MDL_ticket *ticket;
/*
In the most common case when this function is called list
of explicit locks is bigger than two other lists (in fact,
list of statement locks is always empty). So we start by
swapping list of explicit and transactional locks and then
move contents of new list of explicit locks to list of
locks with transactional duration.
*/
DBUG_ASSERT(m_tickets[MDL_STATEMENT].is_empty());
m_tickets[MDL_TRANSACTION].swap(m_tickets[MDL_EXPLICIT]);
Ticket_iterator it_ticket(m_tickets[MDL_EXPLICIT]);
while ((ticket= it_ticket++))
{
m_tickets[MDL_EXPLICIT].remove(ticket);
m_tickets[MDL_TRANSACTION].push_front(ticket);
}
#ifndef DBUG_OFF
Ticket_iterator trans_it(m_tickets[MDL_TRANSACTION]);
while ((ticket= trans_it++))
ticket->m_duration= MDL_TRANSACTION;
#endif
A prerequisite patch for the fix for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". Introduce a notion of a sentinel to MDL_context. A sentinel is a ticket that separates all tickets in the context into two groups: before and after it. Currently we can have (and need) only one designated sentinel -- it separates all locks taken by LOCK TABLE or HANDLER statement, which must survive COMMIT and ROLLBACK and all other locks, which must be released at COMMIT or ROLLBACK. The tricky part is maintaining the sentinel up to date when someone release its corresponding ticket. This can happen, e.g. if someone issues DROP TABLE under LOCK TABLES (generally, see all calls to release_all_locks_for_name()). MDL_context::release_ticket() is modified to take care of it. ****** A fix and a test case for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks". An attempt to mix HANDLER SQL statements, which are transaction- agnostic, an open multi-statement transaction, and DDL against the involved tables (in a concurrent connection) could lead to a deadlock. The deadlock would occur when HANDLER OPEN or HANDLER READ would have to wait on a conflicting metadata lock. If the connection that issued HANDLER statement also had other metadata locks (say, acquired in scope of a transaction), a classical deadlock situation of mutual wait could occur. Incompatible change: entering LOCK TABLES mode automatically closes all open HANDLERs in the current connection. Incompatible change: previously an attempt to wait on a lock in a connection that has an open HANDLER statement could wait indefinitely/deadlock. After this patch, an error ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK is produced. The idea of the fix is to merge thd->handler_mdl_context with the main mdl_context of the connection, used for transactional locks. This makes deadlock detection possible, since all waits with locks are "visible" and available to analysis in a single MDL context of the connection. Since HANDLER locks and transactional locks have a different life cycle -- HANDLERs are explicitly open and closed, and so are HANDLER locks, explicitly acquired and released, whereas transactional locks "accumulate" till the end of a transaction and are released only with COMMIT, ROLLBACK and ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, a concept of "sentinel" was introduced to MDL_context. All locks, HANDLER and others, reside in the same linked list. However, a selected element of the list separates locks with different life cycle. HANDLER locks always reside at the end of the list, after the sentinel. Transactional locks are prepended to the beginning of the list, before the sentinel. Thus, ROLLBACK, COMMIT or ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, only release those locks that reside before the sentinel. HANDLER locks must be released explicitly as part of HANDLER CLOSE statement, or an implicit close. The same approach with sentinel is also employed for LOCK TABLES locks. Since HANDLER and LOCK TABLES statement has never worked together, the implementation is made simple and only maintains one sentinel, which is used either for HANDLER locks, or for LOCK TABLES locks.
2009-12-22 19:09:15 +03:00
}