2006-01-18 00:45:23 +01:00
|
|
|
####################
|
|
|
|
# Change Author: JBM
|
|
|
|
# Change Date: 2006-01-17
|
|
|
|
# Change: Added order by in select
|
|
|
|
####################
|
2006-02-03 01:59:02 +01:00
|
|
|
# Change Date: 2006-02-02
|
|
|
|
# Change: renamed to make bettre sense,
|
|
|
|
# and wrapped per Engine test
|
|
|
|
############################
|
2000-12-07 07:54:59 -07:00
|
|
|
source include/master-slave.inc;
|
2003-01-06 01:48:59 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-03-16 15:57:57 +03:00
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# Bug#7100 relay_log_space_max missing from SHOW VARIABLES
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
SHOW VARIABLES LIKE 'relay_log_space_limit';
|
|
|
|
|
2006-04-19 15:29:49 +02:00
|
|
|
# Matz says: I have no idea what this is supposed to test, but it has
|
|
|
|
# potential for generating different results with some storage engines
|
|
|
|
# that process rows in an order not dependent on the insertion order.
|
|
|
|
# For instance, I would assume that distributed storage engines (like
|
|
|
|
# NDB) could process rows based on locality.
|
|
|
|
|
2006-02-03 01:59:02 +01:00
|
|
|
eval CREATE TABLE t1 (name varchar(64), age smallint(3))ENGINE=$engine_type;
|
2006-04-19 15:29:49 +02:00
|
|
|
INSERT INTO t1 SET name='Andy', age=31;
|
|
|
|
INSERT INTO t1 SET name='Jacob', age=2;
|
|
|
|
INSERT INTO t1 SET name='Caleb', age=1;
|
2001-01-03 02:15:48 +02:00
|
|
|
ALTER TABLE t1 ADD id int(8) ZEROFILL AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY;
|
2006-01-18 00:45:23 +01:00
|
|
|
SELECT * FROM t1 ORDER BY id;
|
2006-04-19 15:29:49 +02:00
|
|
|
sync_slave_with_master;
|
2006-01-18 00:45:23 +01:00
|
|
|
SELECT * FROM t1 ORDER BY id;
|
2001-01-03 02:15:48 +02:00
|
|
|
connection master;
|
2006-04-19 15:29:49 +02:00
|
|
|
DROP TABLE t1;
|
|
|
|
sync_slave_with_master;
|
2005-07-28 03:22:47 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# End of 4.1 tests
|