mariadb/mysql-test/t/rpl_switch_stm_row_mixed.test

546 lines
16 KiB
Text
Raw Normal View History

-- source include/have_row_based.inc
-- source include/not_ndb_default.inc
WL#2977 and WL#2712 global and session-level variable to set the binlog format (row/statement), and new binlog format called "mixed" (which is statement-based except if only row-based is correct, in this cset it means if UDF or UUID is used; more cases could be added in later 5.1 release): SET GLOBAL|SESSION BINLOG_FORMAT=row|statement|mixed|default; the global default is statement unless cluster is enabled (then it's row) as in 5.1-alpha. It's not possible to use SET on this variable if a session is currently in row-based mode and has open temporary tables (because CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE was not binlogged so temp table is not known on slave), or if NDB is enabled (because NDB does not support such change on-the-fly, though it will later), of if in a stored function (see below). The added tests test the possibility or impossibility to SET, their effects, and the mixed mode, including in prepared statements and in stored procedures and functions. Caveats: a) The mixed mode will not work for stored functions: in mixed mode, a stored function will always be binlogged as one call and in a statement-based way (e.g. INSERT VALUES(myfunc()) or SELECT myfunc()). b) for the same reason, changing the thread's binlog format inside a stored function is refused with an error message. c) the same problems apply to triggers; implementing b) for triggers will be done later (will ask Dmitri). Additionally, as the binlog format is now changeable by each user for his session, I remove the implication which was done at startup, where row-based automatically set log-bin-trust-routine-creators to 1 (not possible anymore as a user can now switch to stmt-based and do nasty things again), and automatically set --innodb-locks-unsafe-for-binlog to 1 (was anyway theoretically incorrect as it disabled phantom protection). Plus fixes for compiler warnings.
2006-02-25 22:21:03 +01:00
-- source include/master-slave.inc
connection master;
--disable_warnings
drop database if exists mysqltest1;
create database mysqltest1;
--enable_warnings
use mysqltest1;
set session binlog_format=row;
set global binlog_format=row;
WL#2977 and WL#2712 global and session-level variable to set the binlog format (row/statement), and new binlog format called "mixed" (which is statement-based except if only row-based is correct, in this cset it means if UDF or UUID is used; more cases could be added in later 5.1 release): SET GLOBAL|SESSION BINLOG_FORMAT=row|statement|mixed|default; the global default is statement unless cluster is enabled (then it's row) as in 5.1-alpha. It's not possible to use SET on this variable if a session is currently in row-based mode and has open temporary tables (because CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE was not binlogged so temp table is not known on slave), or if NDB is enabled (because NDB does not support such change on-the-fly, though it will later), of if in a stored function (see below). The added tests test the possibility or impossibility to SET, their effects, and the mixed mode, including in prepared statements and in stored procedures and functions. Caveats: a) The mixed mode will not work for stored functions: in mixed mode, a stored function will always be binlogged as one call and in a statement-based way (e.g. INSERT VALUES(myfunc()) or SELECT myfunc()). b) for the same reason, changing the thread's binlog format inside a stored function is refused with an error message. c) the same problems apply to triggers; implementing b) for triggers will be done later (will ask Dmitri). Additionally, as the binlog format is now changeable by each user for his session, I remove the implication which was done at startup, where row-based automatically set log-bin-trust-routine-creators to 1 (not possible anymore as a user can now switch to stmt-based and do nasty things again), and automatically set --innodb-locks-unsafe-for-binlog to 1 (was anyway theoretically incorrect as it disabled phantom protection). Plus fixes for compiler warnings.
2006-02-25 22:21:03 +01:00
show global variables like "binlog_format%";
show session variables like "binlog_format%";
select @@global.binlog_format, @@session.binlog_format;
CREATE TABLE t1 (a varchar(100));
prepare stmt1 from 'insert into t1 select concat(UUID(),?)';
* Mixed replication mode * : 1) Fix for BUG#19630 "stored function inserting into two auto_increment breaks statement-based binlog": a stored function inserting into two such tables may fail to replicate (inserting wrong data in the slave's copy of the second table) if the slave's second table had an internal auto_increment counter different from master's. Because the auto_increment value autogenerated by master for the 2nd table does not go into binlog, only the first does, so the slave lacks information. To fix this, if running in mixed binlogging mode, if the stored function or trigger plans to update two different tables both having auto_increment columns, we switch to row-based for the whole function. We don't have a simple solution for statement-based binlogging mode, there the bug remains and will be documented as a known problem. Re-enabling rpl_switch_stm_row_mixed. 2) Fix for BUG#20630 "Mixed binlogging mode does not work with stored functions, triggers, views", which was a documented limitation (in mixed mode, we didn't detect that a stored function's execution needed row-based binlogging (due to some UUID() call for example); same for triggers, same for views (a view created from a SELECT UUID(), and doing INSERT INTO sometable SELECT theview; would not replicate row-based). This is implemented by, after parsing a routine's body, remembering in sp_head that this routine needs row-based binlogging. Then when this routine is used, the caller is marked to require row-based binlogging too. Same for views: when we parse a view and detect that its SELECT needs row-based binary logging, we mark the calling LEX as such. 3) Fix for BUG#20499 "mixed mode with temporary table breaks binlog": a temporary table containing e.g. UUID has its changes not binlogged, so any query updating a permanent table with data from the temporary table will run wrongly on slave. Solution: in mixed mode we don't switch back from row-based to statement-based when there exists temporary tables. 4) Attempt to test mysqlbinlog on a binlog generated by mysqlbinlog; impossible due to BUG#11312 and BUG#20329, but test is in place for when they are fixed.
2006-07-09 17:00:47 +02:00
set @string="emergency_1_";
insert into t1 values("work_2_");
WL#2977 and WL#2712 global and session-level variable to set the binlog format (row/statement), and new binlog format called "mixed" (which is statement-based except if only row-based is correct, in this cset it means if UDF or UUID is used; more cases could be added in later 5.1 release): SET GLOBAL|SESSION BINLOG_FORMAT=row|statement|mixed|default; the global default is statement unless cluster is enabled (then it's row) as in 5.1-alpha. It's not possible to use SET on this variable if a session is currently in row-based mode and has open temporary tables (because CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE was not binlogged so temp table is not known on slave), or if NDB is enabled (because NDB does not support such change on-the-fly, though it will later), of if in a stored function (see below). The added tests test the possibility or impossibility to SET, their effects, and the mixed mode, including in prepared statements and in stored procedures and functions. Caveats: a) The mixed mode will not work for stored functions: in mixed mode, a stored function will always be binlogged as one call and in a statement-based way (e.g. INSERT VALUES(myfunc()) or SELECT myfunc()). b) for the same reason, changing the thread's binlog format inside a stored function is refused with an error message. c) the same problems apply to triggers; implementing b) for triggers will be done later (will ask Dmitri). Additionally, as the binlog format is now changeable by each user for his session, I remove the implication which was done at startup, where row-based automatically set log-bin-trust-routine-creators to 1 (not possible anymore as a user can now switch to stmt-based and do nasty things again), and automatically set --innodb-locks-unsafe-for-binlog to 1 (was anyway theoretically incorrect as it disabled phantom protection). Plus fixes for compiler warnings.
2006-02-25 22:21:03 +01:00
execute stmt1 using @string;
deallocate prepare stmt1;
prepare stmt1 from 'insert into t1 select ?';
* Mixed replication mode * : 1) Fix for BUG#19630 "stored function inserting into two auto_increment breaks statement-based binlog": a stored function inserting into two such tables may fail to replicate (inserting wrong data in the slave's copy of the second table) if the slave's second table had an internal auto_increment counter different from master's. Because the auto_increment value autogenerated by master for the 2nd table does not go into binlog, only the first does, so the slave lacks information. To fix this, if running in mixed binlogging mode, if the stored function or trigger plans to update two different tables both having auto_increment columns, we switch to row-based for the whole function. We don't have a simple solution for statement-based binlogging mode, there the bug remains and will be documented as a known problem. Re-enabling rpl_switch_stm_row_mixed. 2) Fix for BUG#20630 "Mixed binlogging mode does not work with stored functions, triggers, views", which was a documented limitation (in mixed mode, we didn't detect that a stored function's execution needed row-based binlogging (due to some UUID() call for example); same for triggers, same for views (a view created from a SELECT UUID(), and doing INSERT INTO sometable SELECT theview; would not replicate row-based). This is implemented by, after parsing a routine's body, remembering in sp_head that this routine needs row-based binlogging. Then when this routine is used, the caller is marked to require row-based binlogging too. Same for views: when we parse a view and detect that its SELECT needs row-based binary logging, we mark the calling LEX as such. 3) Fix for BUG#20499 "mixed mode with temporary table breaks binlog": a temporary table containing e.g. UUID has its changes not binlogged, so any query updating a permanent table with data from the temporary table will run wrongly on slave. Solution: in mixed mode we don't switch back from row-based to statement-based when there exists temporary tables. 4) Attempt to test mysqlbinlog on a binlog generated by mysqlbinlog; impossible due to BUG#11312 and BUG#20329, but test is in place for when they are fixed.
2006-07-09 17:00:47 +02:00
insert into t1 values(concat(UUID(),"work_3_"));
WL#2977 and WL#2712 global and session-level variable to set the binlog format (row/statement), and new binlog format called "mixed" (which is statement-based except if only row-based is correct, in this cset it means if UDF or UUID is used; more cases could be added in later 5.1 release): SET GLOBAL|SESSION BINLOG_FORMAT=row|statement|mixed|default; the global default is statement unless cluster is enabled (then it's row) as in 5.1-alpha. It's not possible to use SET on this variable if a session is currently in row-based mode and has open temporary tables (because CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE was not binlogged so temp table is not known on slave), or if NDB is enabled (because NDB does not support such change on-the-fly, though it will later), of if in a stored function (see below). The added tests test the possibility or impossibility to SET, their effects, and the mixed mode, including in prepared statements and in stored procedures and functions. Caveats: a) The mixed mode will not work for stored functions: in mixed mode, a stored function will always be binlogged as one call and in a statement-based way (e.g. INSERT VALUES(myfunc()) or SELECT myfunc()). b) for the same reason, changing the thread's binlog format inside a stored function is refused with an error message. c) the same problems apply to triggers; implementing b) for triggers will be done later (will ask Dmitri). Additionally, as the binlog format is now changeable by each user for his session, I remove the implication which was done at startup, where row-based automatically set log-bin-trust-routine-creators to 1 (not possible anymore as a user can now switch to stmt-based and do nasty things again), and automatically set --innodb-locks-unsafe-for-binlog to 1 (was anyway theoretically incorrect as it disabled phantom protection). Plus fixes for compiler warnings.
2006-02-25 22:21:03 +01:00
execute stmt1 using @string;
deallocate prepare stmt1;
* Mixed replication mode * : 1) Fix for BUG#19630 "stored function inserting into two auto_increment breaks statement-based binlog": a stored function inserting into two such tables may fail to replicate (inserting wrong data in the slave's copy of the second table) if the slave's second table had an internal auto_increment counter different from master's. Because the auto_increment value autogenerated by master for the 2nd table does not go into binlog, only the first does, so the slave lacks information. To fix this, if running in mixed binlogging mode, if the stored function or trigger plans to update two different tables both having auto_increment columns, we switch to row-based for the whole function. We don't have a simple solution for statement-based binlogging mode, there the bug remains and will be documented as a known problem. Re-enabling rpl_switch_stm_row_mixed. 2) Fix for BUG#20630 "Mixed binlogging mode does not work with stored functions, triggers, views", which was a documented limitation (in mixed mode, we didn't detect that a stored function's execution needed row-based binlogging (due to some UUID() call for example); same for triggers, same for views (a view created from a SELECT UUID(), and doing INSERT INTO sometable SELECT theview; would not replicate row-based). This is implemented by, after parsing a routine's body, remembering in sp_head that this routine needs row-based binlogging. Then when this routine is used, the caller is marked to require row-based binlogging too. Same for views: when we parse a view and detect that its SELECT needs row-based binary logging, we mark the calling LEX as such. 3) Fix for BUG#20499 "mixed mode with temporary table breaks binlog": a temporary table containing e.g. UUID has its changes not binlogged, so any query updating a permanent table with data from the temporary table will run wrongly on slave. Solution: in mixed mode we don't switch back from row-based to statement-based when there exists temporary tables. 4) Attempt to test mysqlbinlog on a binlog generated by mysqlbinlog; impossible due to BUG#11312 and BUG#20329, but test is in place for when they are fixed.
2006-07-09 17:00:47 +02:00
insert into t1 values(concat("for_4_",UUID()));
insert into t1 select "yesterday_5_";
WL#2977 and WL#2712 global and session-level variable to set the binlog format (row/statement), and new binlog format called "mixed" (which is statement-based except if only row-based is correct, in this cset it means if UDF or UUID is used; more cases could be added in later 5.1 release): SET GLOBAL|SESSION BINLOG_FORMAT=row|statement|mixed|default; the global default is statement unless cluster is enabled (then it's row) as in 5.1-alpha. It's not possible to use SET on this variable if a session is currently in row-based mode and has open temporary tables (because CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE was not binlogged so temp table is not known on slave), or if NDB is enabled (because NDB does not support such change on-the-fly, though it will later), of if in a stored function (see below). The added tests test the possibility or impossibility to SET, their effects, and the mixed mode, including in prepared statements and in stored procedures and functions. Caveats: a) The mixed mode will not work for stored functions: in mixed mode, a stored function will always be binlogged as one call and in a statement-based way (e.g. INSERT VALUES(myfunc()) or SELECT myfunc()). b) for the same reason, changing the thread's binlog format inside a stored function is refused with an error message. c) the same problems apply to triggers; implementing b) for triggers will be done later (will ask Dmitri). Additionally, as the binlog format is now changeable by each user for his session, I remove the implication which was done at startup, where row-based automatically set log-bin-trust-routine-creators to 1 (not possible anymore as a user can now switch to stmt-based and do nasty things again), and automatically set --innodb-locks-unsafe-for-binlog to 1 (was anyway theoretically incorrect as it disabled phantom protection). Plus fixes for compiler warnings.
2006-02-25 22:21:03 +01:00
# verify that temp tables prevent a switch to SBR
* Mixed replication mode * : 1) Fix for BUG#19630 "stored function inserting into two auto_increment breaks statement-based binlog": a stored function inserting into two such tables may fail to replicate (inserting wrong data in the slave's copy of the second table) if the slave's second table had an internal auto_increment counter different from master's. Because the auto_increment value autogenerated by master for the 2nd table does not go into binlog, only the first does, so the slave lacks information. To fix this, if running in mixed binlogging mode, if the stored function or trigger plans to update two different tables both having auto_increment columns, we switch to row-based for the whole function. We don't have a simple solution for statement-based binlogging mode, there the bug remains and will be documented as a known problem. Re-enabling rpl_switch_stm_row_mixed. 2) Fix for BUG#20630 "Mixed binlogging mode does not work with stored functions, triggers, views", which was a documented limitation (in mixed mode, we didn't detect that a stored function's execution needed row-based binlogging (due to some UUID() call for example); same for triggers, same for views (a view created from a SELECT UUID(), and doing INSERT INTO sometable SELECT theview; would not replicate row-based). This is implemented by, after parsing a routine's body, remembering in sp_head that this routine needs row-based binlogging. Then when this routine is used, the caller is marked to require row-based binlogging too. Same for views: when we parse a view and detect that its SELECT needs row-based binary logging, we mark the calling LEX as such. 3) Fix for BUG#20499 "mixed mode with temporary table breaks binlog": a temporary table containing e.g. UUID has its changes not binlogged, so any query updating a permanent table with data from the temporary table will run wrongly on slave. Solution: in mixed mode we don't switch back from row-based to statement-based when there exists temporary tables. 4) Attempt to test mysqlbinlog on a binlog generated by mysqlbinlog; impossible due to BUG#11312 and BUG#20329, but test is in place for when they are fixed.
2006-07-09 17:00:47 +02:00
create temporary table tmp(a char(100));
insert into tmp values("see_6_");
WL#2977 and WL#2712 global and session-level variable to set the binlog format (row/statement), and new binlog format called "mixed" (which is statement-based except if only row-based is correct, in this cset it means if UDF or UUID is used; more cases could be added in later 5.1 release): SET GLOBAL|SESSION BINLOG_FORMAT=row|statement|mixed|default; the global default is statement unless cluster is enabled (then it's row) as in 5.1-alpha. It's not possible to use SET on this variable if a session is currently in row-based mode and has open temporary tables (because CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE was not binlogged so temp table is not known on slave), or if NDB is enabled (because NDB does not support such change on-the-fly, though it will later), of if in a stored function (see below). The added tests test the possibility or impossibility to SET, their effects, and the mixed mode, including in prepared statements and in stored procedures and functions. Caveats: a) The mixed mode will not work for stored functions: in mixed mode, a stored function will always be binlogged as one call and in a statement-based way (e.g. INSERT VALUES(myfunc()) or SELECT myfunc()). b) for the same reason, changing the thread's binlog format inside a stored function is refused with an error message. c) the same problems apply to triggers; implementing b) for triggers will be done later (will ask Dmitri). Additionally, as the binlog format is now changeable by each user for his session, I remove the implication which was done at startup, where row-based automatically set log-bin-trust-routine-creators to 1 (not possible anymore as a user can now switch to stmt-based and do nasty things again), and automatically set --innodb-locks-unsafe-for-binlog to 1 (was anyway theoretically incorrect as it disabled phantom protection). Plus fixes for compiler warnings.
2006-02-25 22:21:03 +01:00
--error ER_TEMP_TABLE_PREVENTS_SWITCH_OUT_OF_RBR
set binlog_format=statement;
insert into t1 select * from tmp;
drop temporary table tmp;
# Now we go to SBR
set binlog_format=statement;
show global variables like "binlog_format%";
show session variables like "binlog_format%";
select @@global.binlog_format, @@session.binlog_format;
set global binlog_format=statement;
show global variables like "binlog_format%";
show session variables like "binlog_format%";
select @@global.binlog_format, @@session.binlog_format;
prepare stmt1 from 'insert into t1 select ?';
* Mixed replication mode * : 1) Fix for BUG#19630 "stored function inserting into two auto_increment breaks statement-based binlog": a stored function inserting into two such tables may fail to replicate (inserting wrong data in the slave's copy of the second table) if the slave's second table had an internal auto_increment counter different from master's. Because the auto_increment value autogenerated by master for the 2nd table does not go into binlog, only the first does, so the slave lacks information. To fix this, if running in mixed binlogging mode, if the stored function or trigger plans to update two different tables both having auto_increment columns, we switch to row-based for the whole function. We don't have a simple solution for statement-based binlogging mode, there the bug remains and will be documented as a known problem. Re-enabling rpl_switch_stm_row_mixed. 2) Fix for BUG#20630 "Mixed binlogging mode does not work with stored functions, triggers, views", which was a documented limitation (in mixed mode, we didn't detect that a stored function's execution needed row-based binlogging (due to some UUID() call for example); same for triggers, same for views (a view created from a SELECT UUID(), and doing INSERT INTO sometable SELECT theview; would not replicate row-based). This is implemented by, after parsing a routine's body, remembering in sp_head that this routine needs row-based binlogging. Then when this routine is used, the caller is marked to require row-based binlogging too. Same for views: when we parse a view and detect that its SELECT needs row-based binary logging, we mark the calling LEX as such. 3) Fix for BUG#20499 "mixed mode with temporary table breaks binlog": a temporary table containing e.g. UUID has its changes not binlogged, so any query updating a permanent table with data from the temporary table will run wrongly on slave. Solution: in mixed mode we don't switch back from row-based to statement-based when there exists temporary tables. 4) Attempt to test mysqlbinlog on a binlog generated by mysqlbinlog; impossible due to BUG#11312 and BUG#20329, but test is in place for when they are fixed.
2006-07-09 17:00:47 +02:00
set @string="emergency_7_";
insert into t1 values("work_8_");
WL#2977 and WL#2712 global and session-level variable to set the binlog format (row/statement), and new binlog format called "mixed" (which is statement-based except if only row-based is correct, in this cset it means if UDF or UUID is used; more cases could be added in later 5.1 release): SET GLOBAL|SESSION BINLOG_FORMAT=row|statement|mixed|default; the global default is statement unless cluster is enabled (then it's row) as in 5.1-alpha. It's not possible to use SET on this variable if a session is currently in row-based mode and has open temporary tables (because CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE was not binlogged so temp table is not known on slave), or if NDB is enabled (because NDB does not support such change on-the-fly, though it will later), of if in a stored function (see below). The added tests test the possibility or impossibility to SET, their effects, and the mixed mode, including in prepared statements and in stored procedures and functions. Caveats: a) The mixed mode will not work for stored functions: in mixed mode, a stored function will always be binlogged as one call and in a statement-based way (e.g. INSERT VALUES(myfunc()) or SELECT myfunc()). b) for the same reason, changing the thread's binlog format inside a stored function is refused with an error message. c) the same problems apply to triggers; implementing b) for triggers will be done later (will ask Dmitri). Additionally, as the binlog format is now changeable by each user for his session, I remove the implication which was done at startup, where row-based automatically set log-bin-trust-routine-creators to 1 (not possible anymore as a user can now switch to stmt-based and do nasty things again), and automatically set --innodb-locks-unsafe-for-binlog to 1 (was anyway theoretically incorrect as it disabled phantom protection). Plus fixes for compiler warnings.
2006-02-25 22:21:03 +01:00
execute stmt1 using @string;
deallocate prepare stmt1;
prepare stmt1 from 'insert into t1 select ?';
* Mixed replication mode * : 1) Fix for BUG#19630 "stored function inserting into two auto_increment breaks statement-based binlog": a stored function inserting into two such tables may fail to replicate (inserting wrong data in the slave's copy of the second table) if the slave's second table had an internal auto_increment counter different from master's. Because the auto_increment value autogenerated by master for the 2nd table does not go into binlog, only the first does, so the slave lacks information. To fix this, if running in mixed binlogging mode, if the stored function or trigger plans to update two different tables both having auto_increment columns, we switch to row-based for the whole function. We don't have a simple solution for statement-based binlogging mode, there the bug remains and will be documented as a known problem. Re-enabling rpl_switch_stm_row_mixed. 2) Fix for BUG#20630 "Mixed binlogging mode does not work with stored functions, triggers, views", which was a documented limitation (in mixed mode, we didn't detect that a stored function's execution needed row-based binlogging (due to some UUID() call for example); same for triggers, same for views (a view created from a SELECT UUID(), and doing INSERT INTO sometable SELECT theview; would not replicate row-based). This is implemented by, after parsing a routine's body, remembering in sp_head that this routine needs row-based binlogging. Then when this routine is used, the caller is marked to require row-based binlogging too. Same for views: when we parse a view and detect that its SELECT needs row-based binary logging, we mark the calling LEX as such. 3) Fix for BUG#20499 "mixed mode with temporary table breaks binlog": a temporary table containing e.g. UUID has its changes not binlogged, so any query updating a permanent table with data from the temporary table will run wrongly on slave. Solution: in mixed mode we don't switch back from row-based to statement-based when there exists temporary tables. 4) Attempt to test mysqlbinlog on a binlog generated by mysqlbinlog; impossible due to BUG#11312 and BUG#20329, but test is in place for when they are fixed.
2006-07-09 17:00:47 +02:00
insert into t1 values("work_9_");
WL#2977 and WL#2712 global and session-level variable to set the binlog format (row/statement), and new binlog format called "mixed" (which is statement-based except if only row-based is correct, in this cset it means if UDF or UUID is used; more cases could be added in later 5.1 release): SET GLOBAL|SESSION BINLOG_FORMAT=row|statement|mixed|default; the global default is statement unless cluster is enabled (then it's row) as in 5.1-alpha. It's not possible to use SET on this variable if a session is currently in row-based mode and has open temporary tables (because CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE was not binlogged so temp table is not known on slave), or if NDB is enabled (because NDB does not support such change on-the-fly, though it will later), of if in a stored function (see below). The added tests test the possibility or impossibility to SET, their effects, and the mixed mode, including in prepared statements and in stored procedures and functions. Caveats: a) The mixed mode will not work for stored functions: in mixed mode, a stored function will always be binlogged as one call and in a statement-based way (e.g. INSERT VALUES(myfunc()) or SELECT myfunc()). b) for the same reason, changing the thread's binlog format inside a stored function is refused with an error message. c) the same problems apply to triggers; implementing b) for triggers will be done later (will ask Dmitri). Additionally, as the binlog format is now changeable by each user for his session, I remove the implication which was done at startup, where row-based automatically set log-bin-trust-routine-creators to 1 (not possible anymore as a user can now switch to stmt-based and do nasty things again), and automatically set --innodb-locks-unsafe-for-binlog to 1 (was anyway theoretically incorrect as it disabled phantom protection). Plus fixes for compiler warnings.
2006-02-25 22:21:03 +01:00
execute stmt1 using @string;
deallocate prepare stmt1;
* Mixed replication mode * : 1) Fix for BUG#19630 "stored function inserting into two auto_increment breaks statement-based binlog": a stored function inserting into two such tables may fail to replicate (inserting wrong data in the slave's copy of the second table) if the slave's second table had an internal auto_increment counter different from master's. Because the auto_increment value autogenerated by master for the 2nd table does not go into binlog, only the first does, so the slave lacks information. To fix this, if running in mixed binlogging mode, if the stored function or trigger plans to update two different tables both having auto_increment columns, we switch to row-based for the whole function. We don't have a simple solution for statement-based binlogging mode, there the bug remains and will be documented as a known problem. Re-enabling rpl_switch_stm_row_mixed. 2) Fix for BUG#20630 "Mixed binlogging mode does not work with stored functions, triggers, views", which was a documented limitation (in mixed mode, we didn't detect that a stored function's execution needed row-based binlogging (due to some UUID() call for example); same for triggers, same for views (a view created from a SELECT UUID(), and doing INSERT INTO sometable SELECT theview; would not replicate row-based). This is implemented by, after parsing a routine's body, remembering in sp_head that this routine needs row-based binlogging. Then when this routine is used, the caller is marked to require row-based binlogging too. Same for views: when we parse a view and detect that its SELECT needs row-based binary logging, we mark the calling LEX as such. 3) Fix for BUG#20499 "mixed mode with temporary table breaks binlog": a temporary table containing e.g. UUID has its changes not binlogged, so any query updating a permanent table with data from the temporary table will run wrongly on slave. Solution: in mixed mode we don't switch back from row-based to statement-based when there exists temporary tables. 4) Attempt to test mysqlbinlog on a binlog generated by mysqlbinlog; impossible due to BUG#11312 and BUG#20329, but test is in place for when they are fixed.
2006-07-09 17:00:47 +02:00
insert into t1 values("for_10_");
insert into t1 select "yesterday_11_";
WL#2977 and WL#2712 global and session-level variable to set the binlog format (row/statement), and new binlog format called "mixed" (which is statement-based except if only row-based is correct, in this cset it means if UDF or UUID is used; more cases could be added in later 5.1 release): SET GLOBAL|SESSION BINLOG_FORMAT=row|statement|mixed|default; the global default is statement unless cluster is enabled (then it's row) as in 5.1-alpha. It's not possible to use SET on this variable if a session is currently in row-based mode and has open temporary tables (because CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE was not binlogged so temp table is not known on slave), or if NDB is enabled (because NDB does not support such change on-the-fly, though it will later), of if in a stored function (see below). The added tests test the possibility or impossibility to SET, their effects, and the mixed mode, including in prepared statements and in stored procedures and functions. Caveats: a) The mixed mode will not work for stored functions: in mixed mode, a stored function will always be binlogged as one call and in a statement-based way (e.g. INSERT VALUES(myfunc()) or SELECT myfunc()). b) for the same reason, changing the thread's binlog format inside a stored function is refused with an error message. c) the same problems apply to triggers; implementing b) for triggers will be done later (will ask Dmitri). Additionally, as the binlog format is now changeable by each user for his session, I remove the implication which was done at startup, where row-based automatically set log-bin-trust-routine-creators to 1 (not possible anymore as a user can now switch to stmt-based and do nasty things again), and automatically set --innodb-locks-unsafe-for-binlog to 1 (was anyway theoretically incorrect as it disabled phantom protection). Plus fixes for compiler warnings.
2006-02-25 22:21:03 +01:00
# test SET DEFAULT (=statement at this point of test)
set binlog_format=default;
select @@global.binlog_format, @@session.binlog_format;
# due to cluster it's hard to set back to default
--error ER_NO_DEFAULT
set global binlog_format=default;
select @@global.binlog_format, @@session.binlog_format;
prepare stmt1 from 'insert into t1 select ?';
* Mixed replication mode * : 1) Fix for BUG#19630 "stored function inserting into two auto_increment breaks statement-based binlog": a stored function inserting into two such tables may fail to replicate (inserting wrong data in the slave's copy of the second table) if the slave's second table had an internal auto_increment counter different from master's. Because the auto_increment value autogenerated by master for the 2nd table does not go into binlog, only the first does, so the slave lacks information. To fix this, if running in mixed binlogging mode, if the stored function or trigger plans to update two different tables both having auto_increment columns, we switch to row-based for the whole function. We don't have a simple solution for statement-based binlogging mode, there the bug remains and will be documented as a known problem. Re-enabling rpl_switch_stm_row_mixed. 2) Fix for BUG#20630 "Mixed binlogging mode does not work with stored functions, triggers, views", which was a documented limitation (in mixed mode, we didn't detect that a stored function's execution needed row-based binlogging (due to some UUID() call for example); same for triggers, same for views (a view created from a SELECT UUID(), and doing INSERT INTO sometable SELECT theview; would not replicate row-based). This is implemented by, after parsing a routine's body, remembering in sp_head that this routine needs row-based binlogging. Then when this routine is used, the caller is marked to require row-based binlogging too. Same for views: when we parse a view and detect that its SELECT needs row-based binary logging, we mark the calling LEX as such. 3) Fix for BUG#20499 "mixed mode with temporary table breaks binlog": a temporary table containing e.g. UUID has its changes not binlogged, so any query updating a permanent table with data from the temporary table will run wrongly on slave. Solution: in mixed mode we don't switch back from row-based to statement-based when there exists temporary tables. 4) Attempt to test mysqlbinlog on a binlog generated by mysqlbinlog; impossible due to BUG#11312 and BUG#20329, but test is in place for when they are fixed.
2006-07-09 17:00:47 +02:00
set @string="emergency_12_";
insert into t1 values("work_13_");
WL#2977 and WL#2712 global and session-level variable to set the binlog format (row/statement), and new binlog format called "mixed" (which is statement-based except if only row-based is correct, in this cset it means if UDF or UUID is used; more cases could be added in later 5.1 release): SET GLOBAL|SESSION BINLOG_FORMAT=row|statement|mixed|default; the global default is statement unless cluster is enabled (then it's row) as in 5.1-alpha. It's not possible to use SET on this variable if a session is currently in row-based mode and has open temporary tables (because CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE was not binlogged so temp table is not known on slave), or if NDB is enabled (because NDB does not support such change on-the-fly, though it will later), of if in a stored function (see below). The added tests test the possibility or impossibility to SET, their effects, and the mixed mode, including in prepared statements and in stored procedures and functions. Caveats: a) The mixed mode will not work for stored functions: in mixed mode, a stored function will always be binlogged as one call and in a statement-based way (e.g. INSERT VALUES(myfunc()) or SELECT myfunc()). b) for the same reason, changing the thread's binlog format inside a stored function is refused with an error message. c) the same problems apply to triggers; implementing b) for triggers will be done later (will ask Dmitri). Additionally, as the binlog format is now changeable by each user for his session, I remove the implication which was done at startup, where row-based automatically set log-bin-trust-routine-creators to 1 (not possible anymore as a user can now switch to stmt-based and do nasty things again), and automatically set --innodb-locks-unsafe-for-binlog to 1 (was anyway theoretically incorrect as it disabled phantom protection). Plus fixes for compiler warnings.
2006-02-25 22:21:03 +01:00
execute stmt1 using @string;
deallocate prepare stmt1;
prepare stmt1 from 'insert into t1 select ?';
* Mixed replication mode * : 1) Fix for BUG#19630 "stored function inserting into two auto_increment breaks statement-based binlog": a stored function inserting into two such tables may fail to replicate (inserting wrong data in the slave's copy of the second table) if the slave's second table had an internal auto_increment counter different from master's. Because the auto_increment value autogenerated by master for the 2nd table does not go into binlog, only the first does, so the slave lacks information. To fix this, if running in mixed binlogging mode, if the stored function or trigger plans to update two different tables both having auto_increment columns, we switch to row-based for the whole function. We don't have a simple solution for statement-based binlogging mode, there the bug remains and will be documented as a known problem. Re-enabling rpl_switch_stm_row_mixed. 2) Fix for BUG#20630 "Mixed binlogging mode does not work with stored functions, triggers, views", which was a documented limitation (in mixed mode, we didn't detect that a stored function's execution needed row-based binlogging (due to some UUID() call for example); same for triggers, same for views (a view created from a SELECT UUID(), and doing INSERT INTO sometable SELECT theview; would not replicate row-based). This is implemented by, after parsing a routine's body, remembering in sp_head that this routine needs row-based binlogging. Then when this routine is used, the caller is marked to require row-based binlogging too. Same for views: when we parse a view and detect that its SELECT needs row-based binary logging, we mark the calling LEX as such. 3) Fix for BUG#20499 "mixed mode with temporary table breaks binlog": a temporary table containing e.g. UUID has its changes not binlogged, so any query updating a permanent table with data from the temporary table will run wrongly on slave. Solution: in mixed mode we don't switch back from row-based to statement-based when there exists temporary tables. 4) Attempt to test mysqlbinlog on a binlog generated by mysqlbinlog; impossible due to BUG#11312 and BUG#20329, but test is in place for when they are fixed.
2006-07-09 17:00:47 +02:00
insert into t1 values("work_14_");
WL#2977 and WL#2712 global and session-level variable to set the binlog format (row/statement), and new binlog format called "mixed" (which is statement-based except if only row-based is correct, in this cset it means if UDF or UUID is used; more cases could be added in later 5.1 release): SET GLOBAL|SESSION BINLOG_FORMAT=row|statement|mixed|default; the global default is statement unless cluster is enabled (then it's row) as in 5.1-alpha. It's not possible to use SET on this variable if a session is currently in row-based mode and has open temporary tables (because CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE was not binlogged so temp table is not known on slave), or if NDB is enabled (because NDB does not support such change on-the-fly, though it will later), of if in a stored function (see below). The added tests test the possibility or impossibility to SET, their effects, and the mixed mode, including in prepared statements and in stored procedures and functions. Caveats: a) The mixed mode will not work for stored functions: in mixed mode, a stored function will always be binlogged as one call and in a statement-based way (e.g. INSERT VALUES(myfunc()) or SELECT myfunc()). b) for the same reason, changing the thread's binlog format inside a stored function is refused with an error message. c) the same problems apply to triggers; implementing b) for triggers will be done later (will ask Dmitri). Additionally, as the binlog format is now changeable by each user for his session, I remove the implication which was done at startup, where row-based automatically set log-bin-trust-routine-creators to 1 (not possible anymore as a user can now switch to stmt-based and do nasty things again), and automatically set --innodb-locks-unsafe-for-binlog to 1 (was anyway theoretically incorrect as it disabled phantom protection). Plus fixes for compiler warnings.
2006-02-25 22:21:03 +01:00
execute stmt1 using @string;
deallocate prepare stmt1;
* Mixed replication mode * : 1) Fix for BUG#19630 "stored function inserting into two auto_increment breaks statement-based binlog": a stored function inserting into two such tables may fail to replicate (inserting wrong data in the slave's copy of the second table) if the slave's second table had an internal auto_increment counter different from master's. Because the auto_increment value autogenerated by master for the 2nd table does not go into binlog, only the first does, so the slave lacks information. To fix this, if running in mixed binlogging mode, if the stored function or trigger plans to update two different tables both having auto_increment columns, we switch to row-based for the whole function. We don't have a simple solution for statement-based binlogging mode, there the bug remains and will be documented as a known problem. Re-enabling rpl_switch_stm_row_mixed. 2) Fix for BUG#20630 "Mixed binlogging mode does not work with stored functions, triggers, views", which was a documented limitation (in mixed mode, we didn't detect that a stored function's execution needed row-based binlogging (due to some UUID() call for example); same for triggers, same for views (a view created from a SELECT UUID(), and doing INSERT INTO sometable SELECT theview; would not replicate row-based). This is implemented by, after parsing a routine's body, remembering in sp_head that this routine needs row-based binlogging. Then when this routine is used, the caller is marked to require row-based binlogging too. Same for views: when we parse a view and detect that its SELECT needs row-based binary logging, we mark the calling LEX as such. 3) Fix for BUG#20499 "mixed mode with temporary table breaks binlog": a temporary table containing e.g. UUID has its changes not binlogged, so any query updating a permanent table with data from the temporary table will run wrongly on slave. Solution: in mixed mode we don't switch back from row-based to statement-based when there exists temporary tables. 4) Attempt to test mysqlbinlog on a binlog generated by mysqlbinlog; impossible due to BUG#11312 and BUG#20329, but test is in place for when they are fixed.
2006-07-09 17:00:47 +02:00
insert into t1 values("for_15_");
insert into t1 select "yesterday_16_";
WL#2977 and WL#2712 global and session-level variable to set the binlog format (row/statement), and new binlog format called "mixed" (which is statement-based except if only row-based is correct, in this cset it means if UDF or UUID is used; more cases could be added in later 5.1 release): SET GLOBAL|SESSION BINLOG_FORMAT=row|statement|mixed|default; the global default is statement unless cluster is enabled (then it's row) as in 5.1-alpha. It's not possible to use SET on this variable if a session is currently in row-based mode and has open temporary tables (because CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE was not binlogged so temp table is not known on slave), or if NDB is enabled (because NDB does not support such change on-the-fly, though it will later), of if in a stored function (see below). The added tests test the possibility or impossibility to SET, their effects, and the mixed mode, including in prepared statements and in stored procedures and functions. Caveats: a) The mixed mode will not work for stored functions: in mixed mode, a stored function will always be binlogged as one call and in a statement-based way (e.g. INSERT VALUES(myfunc()) or SELECT myfunc()). b) for the same reason, changing the thread's binlog format inside a stored function is refused with an error message. c) the same problems apply to triggers; implementing b) for triggers will be done later (will ask Dmitri). Additionally, as the binlog format is now changeable by each user for his session, I remove the implication which was done at startup, where row-based automatically set log-bin-trust-routine-creators to 1 (not possible anymore as a user can now switch to stmt-based and do nasty things again), and automatically set --innodb-locks-unsafe-for-binlog to 1 (was anyway theoretically incorrect as it disabled phantom protection). Plus fixes for compiler warnings.
2006-02-25 22:21:03 +01:00
# and now the mixed mode
set binlog_format=mixed;
select @@global.binlog_format, @@session.binlog_format;
set global binlog_format=mixed;
select @@global.binlog_format, @@session.binlog_format;
prepare stmt1 from 'insert into t1 select concat(UUID(),?)';
* Mixed replication mode * : 1) Fix for BUG#19630 "stored function inserting into two auto_increment breaks statement-based binlog": a stored function inserting into two such tables may fail to replicate (inserting wrong data in the slave's copy of the second table) if the slave's second table had an internal auto_increment counter different from master's. Because the auto_increment value autogenerated by master for the 2nd table does not go into binlog, only the first does, so the slave lacks information. To fix this, if running in mixed binlogging mode, if the stored function or trigger plans to update two different tables both having auto_increment columns, we switch to row-based for the whole function. We don't have a simple solution for statement-based binlogging mode, there the bug remains and will be documented as a known problem. Re-enabling rpl_switch_stm_row_mixed. 2) Fix for BUG#20630 "Mixed binlogging mode does not work with stored functions, triggers, views", which was a documented limitation (in mixed mode, we didn't detect that a stored function's execution needed row-based binlogging (due to some UUID() call for example); same for triggers, same for views (a view created from a SELECT UUID(), and doing INSERT INTO sometable SELECT theview; would not replicate row-based). This is implemented by, after parsing a routine's body, remembering in sp_head that this routine needs row-based binlogging. Then when this routine is used, the caller is marked to require row-based binlogging too. Same for views: when we parse a view and detect that its SELECT needs row-based binary logging, we mark the calling LEX as such. 3) Fix for BUG#20499 "mixed mode with temporary table breaks binlog": a temporary table containing e.g. UUID has its changes not binlogged, so any query updating a permanent table with data from the temporary table will run wrongly on slave. Solution: in mixed mode we don't switch back from row-based to statement-based when there exists temporary tables. 4) Attempt to test mysqlbinlog on a binlog generated by mysqlbinlog; impossible due to BUG#11312 and BUG#20329, but test is in place for when they are fixed.
2006-07-09 17:00:47 +02:00
set @string="emergency_17_";
insert into t1 values("work_18_");
WL#2977 and WL#2712 global and session-level variable to set the binlog format (row/statement), and new binlog format called "mixed" (which is statement-based except if only row-based is correct, in this cset it means if UDF or UUID is used; more cases could be added in later 5.1 release): SET GLOBAL|SESSION BINLOG_FORMAT=row|statement|mixed|default; the global default is statement unless cluster is enabled (then it's row) as in 5.1-alpha. It's not possible to use SET on this variable if a session is currently in row-based mode and has open temporary tables (because CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE was not binlogged so temp table is not known on slave), or if NDB is enabled (because NDB does not support such change on-the-fly, though it will later), of if in a stored function (see below). The added tests test the possibility or impossibility to SET, their effects, and the mixed mode, including in prepared statements and in stored procedures and functions. Caveats: a) The mixed mode will not work for stored functions: in mixed mode, a stored function will always be binlogged as one call and in a statement-based way (e.g. INSERT VALUES(myfunc()) or SELECT myfunc()). b) for the same reason, changing the thread's binlog format inside a stored function is refused with an error message. c) the same problems apply to triggers; implementing b) for triggers will be done later (will ask Dmitri). Additionally, as the binlog format is now changeable by each user for his session, I remove the implication which was done at startup, where row-based automatically set log-bin-trust-routine-creators to 1 (not possible anymore as a user can now switch to stmt-based and do nasty things again), and automatically set --innodb-locks-unsafe-for-binlog to 1 (was anyway theoretically incorrect as it disabled phantom protection). Plus fixes for compiler warnings.
2006-02-25 22:21:03 +01:00
execute stmt1 using @string;
deallocate prepare stmt1;
prepare stmt1 from 'insert into t1 select ?';
* Mixed replication mode * : 1) Fix for BUG#19630 "stored function inserting into two auto_increment breaks statement-based binlog": a stored function inserting into two such tables may fail to replicate (inserting wrong data in the slave's copy of the second table) if the slave's second table had an internal auto_increment counter different from master's. Because the auto_increment value autogenerated by master for the 2nd table does not go into binlog, only the first does, so the slave lacks information. To fix this, if running in mixed binlogging mode, if the stored function or trigger plans to update two different tables both having auto_increment columns, we switch to row-based for the whole function. We don't have a simple solution for statement-based binlogging mode, there the bug remains and will be documented as a known problem. Re-enabling rpl_switch_stm_row_mixed. 2) Fix for BUG#20630 "Mixed binlogging mode does not work with stored functions, triggers, views", which was a documented limitation (in mixed mode, we didn't detect that a stored function's execution needed row-based binlogging (due to some UUID() call for example); same for triggers, same for views (a view created from a SELECT UUID(), and doing INSERT INTO sometable SELECT theview; would not replicate row-based). This is implemented by, after parsing a routine's body, remembering in sp_head that this routine needs row-based binlogging. Then when this routine is used, the caller is marked to require row-based binlogging too. Same for views: when we parse a view and detect that its SELECT needs row-based binary logging, we mark the calling LEX as such. 3) Fix for BUG#20499 "mixed mode with temporary table breaks binlog": a temporary table containing e.g. UUID has its changes not binlogged, so any query updating a permanent table with data from the temporary table will run wrongly on slave. Solution: in mixed mode we don't switch back from row-based to statement-based when there exists temporary tables. 4) Attempt to test mysqlbinlog on a binlog generated by mysqlbinlog; impossible due to BUG#11312 and BUG#20329, but test is in place for when they are fixed.
2006-07-09 17:00:47 +02:00
insert into t1 values(concat(UUID(),"work_19_"));
WL#2977 and WL#2712 global and session-level variable to set the binlog format (row/statement), and new binlog format called "mixed" (which is statement-based except if only row-based is correct, in this cset it means if UDF or UUID is used; more cases could be added in later 5.1 release): SET GLOBAL|SESSION BINLOG_FORMAT=row|statement|mixed|default; the global default is statement unless cluster is enabled (then it's row) as in 5.1-alpha. It's not possible to use SET on this variable if a session is currently in row-based mode and has open temporary tables (because CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE was not binlogged so temp table is not known on slave), or if NDB is enabled (because NDB does not support such change on-the-fly, though it will later), of if in a stored function (see below). The added tests test the possibility or impossibility to SET, their effects, and the mixed mode, including in prepared statements and in stored procedures and functions. Caveats: a) The mixed mode will not work for stored functions: in mixed mode, a stored function will always be binlogged as one call and in a statement-based way (e.g. INSERT VALUES(myfunc()) or SELECT myfunc()). b) for the same reason, changing the thread's binlog format inside a stored function is refused with an error message. c) the same problems apply to triggers; implementing b) for triggers will be done later (will ask Dmitri). Additionally, as the binlog format is now changeable by each user for his session, I remove the implication which was done at startup, where row-based automatically set log-bin-trust-routine-creators to 1 (not possible anymore as a user can now switch to stmt-based and do nasty things again), and automatically set --innodb-locks-unsafe-for-binlog to 1 (was anyway theoretically incorrect as it disabled phantom protection). Plus fixes for compiler warnings.
2006-02-25 22:21:03 +01:00
execute stmt1 using @string;
deallocate prepare stmt1;
* Mixed replication mode * : 1) Fix for BUG#19630 "stored function inserting into two auto_increment breaks statement-based binlog": a stored function inserting into two such tables may fail to replicate (inserting wrong data in the slave's copy of the second table) if the slave's second table had an internal auto_increment counter different from master's. Because the auto_increment value autogenerated by master for the 2nd table does not go into binlog, only the first does, so the slave lacks information. To fix this, if running in mixed binlogging mode, if the stored function or trigger plans to update two different tables both having auto_increment columns, we switch to row-based for the whole function. We don't have a simple solution for statement-based binlogging mode, there the bug remains and will be documented as a known problem. Re-enabling rpl_switch_stm_row_mixed. 2) Fix for BUG#20630 "Mixed binlogging mode does not work with stored functions, triggers, views", which was a documented limitation (in mixed mode, we didn't detect that a stored function's execution needed row-based binlogging (due to some UUID() call for example); same for triggers, same for views (a view created from a SELECT UUID(), and doing INSERT INTO sometable SELECT theview; would not replicate row-based). This is implemented by, after parsing a routine's body, remembering in sp_head that this routine needs row-based binlogging. Then when this routine is used, the caller is marked to require row-based binlogging too. Same for views: when we parse a view and detect that its SELECT needs row-based binary logging, we mark the calling LEX as such. 3) Fix for BUG#20499 "mixed mode with temporary table breaks binlog": a temporary table containing e.g. UUID has its changes not binlogged, so any query updating a permanent table with data from the temporary table will run wrongly on slave. Solution: in mixed mode we don't switch back from row-based to statement-based when there exists temporary tables. 4) Attempt to test mysqlbinlog on a binlog generated by mysqlbinlog; impossible due to BUG#11312 and BUG#20329, but test is in place for when they are fixed.
2006-07-09 17:00:47 +02:00
insert into t1 values(concat("for_20_",UUID()));
insert into t1 select "yesterday_21_";
WL#2977 and WL#2712 global and session-level variable to set the binlog format (row/statement), and new binlog format called "mixed" (which is statement-based except if only row-based is correct, in this cset it means if UDF or UUID is used; more cases could be added in later 5.1 release): SET GLOBAL|SESSION BINLOG_FORMAT=row|statement|mixed|default; the global default is statement unless cluster is enabled (then it's row) as in 5.1-alpha. It's not possible to use SET on this variable if a session is currently in row-based mode and has open temporary tables (because CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE was not binlogged so temp table is not known on slave), or if NDB is enabled (because NDB does not support such change on-the-fly, though it will later), of if in a stored function (see below). The added tests test the possibility or impossibility to SET, their effects, and the mixed mode, including in prepared statements and in stored procedures and functions. Caveats: a) The mixed mode will not work for stored functions: in mixed mode, a stored function will always be binlogged as one call and in a statement-based way (e.g. INSERT VALUES(myfunc()) or SELECT myfunc()). b) for the same reason, changing the thread's binlog format inside a stored function is refused with an error message. c) the same problems apply to triggers; implementing b) for triggers will be done later (will ask Dmitri). Additionally, as the binlog format is now changeable by each user for his session, I remove the implication which was done at startup, where row-based automatically set log-bin-trust-routine-creators to 1 (not possible anymore as a user can now switch to stmt-based and do nasty things again), and automatically set --innodb-locks-unsafe-for-binlog to 1 (was anyway theoretically incorrect as it disabled phantom protection). Plus fixes for compiler warnings.
2006-02-25 22:21:03 +01:00
prepare stmt1 from 'insert into t1 select ?';
* Mixed replication mode * : 1) Fix for BUG#19630 "stored function inserting into two auto_increment breaks statement-based binlog": a stored function inserting into two such tables may fail to replicate (inserting wrong data in the slave's copy of the second table) if the slave's second table had an internal auto_increment counter different from master's. Because the auto_increment value autogenerated by master for the 2nd table does not go into binlog, only the first does, so the slave lacks information. To fix this, if running in mixed binlogging mode, if the stored function or trigger plans to update two different tables both having auto_increment columns, we switch to row-based for the whole function. We don't have a simple solution for statement-based binlogging mode, there the bug remains and will be documented as a known problem. Re-enabling rpl_switch_stm_row_mixed. 2) Fix for BUG#20630 "Mixed binlogging mode does not work with stored functions, triggers, views", which was a documented limitation (in mixed mode, we didn't detect that a stored function's execution needed row-based binlogging (due to some UUID() call for example); same for triggers, same for views (a view created from a SELECT UUID(), and doing INSERT INTO sometable SELECT theview; would not replicate row-based). This is implemented by, after parsing a routine's body, remembering in sp_head that this routine needs row-based binlogging. Then when this routine is used, the caller is marked to require row-based binlogging too. Same for views: when we parse a view and detect that its SELECT needs row-based binary logging, we mark the calling LEX as such. 3) Fix for BUG#20499 "mixed mode with temporary table breaks binlog": a temporary table containing e.g. UUID has its changes not binlogged, so any query updating a permanent table with data from the temporary table will run wrongly on slave. Solution: in mixed mode we don't switch back from row-based to statement-based when there exists temporary tables. 4) Attempt to test mysqlbinlog on a binlog generated by mysqlbinlog; impossible due to BUG#11312 and BUG#20329, but test is in place for when they are fixed.
2006-07-09 17:00:47 +02:00
insert into t1 values(concat(UUID(),"work_22_"));
WL#2977 and WL#2712 global and session-level variable to set the binlog format (row/statement), and new binlog format called "mixed" (which is statement-based except if only row-based is correct, in this cset it means if UDF or UUID is used; more cases could be added in later 5.1 release): SET GLOBAL|SESSION BINLOG_FORMAT=row|statement|mixed|default; the global default is statement unless cluster is enabled (then it's row) as in 5.1-alpha. It's not possible to use SET on this variable if a session is currently in row-based mode and has open temporary tables (because CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE was not binlogged so temp table is not known on slave), or if NDB is enabled (because NDB does not support such change on-the-fly, though it will later), of if in a stored function (see below). The added tests test the possibility or impossibility to SET, their effects, and the mixed mode, including in prepared statements and in stored procedures and functions. Caveats: a) The mixed mode will not work for stored functions: in mixed mode, a stored function will always be binlogged as one call and in a statement-based way (e.g. INSERT VALUES(myfunc()) or SELECT myfunc()). b) for the same reason, changing the thread's binlog format inside a stored function is refused with an error message. c) the same problems apply to triggers; implementing b) for triggers will be done later (will ask Dmitri). Additionally, as the binlog format is now changeable by each user for his session, I remove the implication which was done at startup, where row-based automatically set log-bin-trust-routine-creators to 1 (not possible anymore as a user can now switch to stmt-based and do nasty things again), and automatically set --innodb-locks-unsafe-for-binlog to 1 (was anyway theoretically incorrect as it disabled phantom protection). Plus fixes for compiler warnings.
2006-02-25 22:21:03 +01:00
execute stmt1 using @string;
deallocate prepare stmt1;
* Mixed replication mode * : 1) Fix for BUG#19630 "stored function inserting into two auto_increment breaks statement-based binlog": a stored function inserting into two such tables may fail to replicate (inserting wrong data in the slave's copy of the second table) if the slave's second table had an internal auto_increment counter different from master's. Because the auto_increment value autogenerated by master for the 2nd table does not go into binlog, only the first does, so the slave lacks information. To fix this, if running in mixed binlogging mode, if the stored function or trigger plans to update two different tables both having auto_increment columns, we switch to row-based for the whole function. We don't have a simple solution for statement-based binlogging mode, there the bug remains and will be documented as a known problem. Re-enabling rpl_switch_stm_row_mixed. 2) Fix for BUG#20630 "Mixed binlogging mode does not work with stored functions, triggers, views", which was a documented limitation (in mixed mode, we didn't detect that a stored function's execution needed row-based binlogging (due to some UUID() call for example); same for triggers, same for views (a view created from a SELECT UUID(), and doing INSERT INTO sometable SELECT theview; would not replicate row-based). This is implemented by, after parsing a routine's body, remembering in sp_head that this routine needs row-based binlogging. Then when this routine is used, the caller is marked to require row-based binlogging too. Same for views: when we parse a view and detect that its SELECT needs row-based binary logging, we mark the calling LEX as such. 3) Fix for BUG#20499 "mixed mode with temporary table breaks binlog": a temporary table containing e.g. UUID has its changes not binlogged, so any query updating a permanent table with data from the temporary table will run wrongly on slave. Solution: in mixed mode we don't switch back from row-based to statement-based when there exists temporary tables. 4) Attempt to test mysqlbinlog on a binlog generated by mysqlbinlog; impossible due to BUG#11312 and BUG#20329, but test is in place for when they are fixed.
2006-07-09 17:00:47 +02:00
insert into t1 values(concat("for_23_",UUID()));
insert into t1 select "yesterday_24_";
WL#2977 and WL#2712 global and session-level variable to set the binlog format (row/statement), and new binlog format called "mixed" (which is statement-based except if only row-based is correct, in this cset it means if UDF or UUID is used; more cases could be added in later 5.1 release): SET GLOBAL|SESSION BINLOG_FORMAT=row|statement|mixed|default; the global default is statement unless cluster is enabled (then it's row) as in 5.1-alpha. It's not possible to use SET on this variable if a session is currently in row-based mode and has open temporary tables (because CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE was not binlogged so temp table is not known on slave), or if NDB is enabled (because NDB does not support such change on-the-fly, though it will later), of if in a stored function (see below). The added tests test the possibility or impossibility to SET, their effects, and the mixed mode, including in prepared statements and in stored procedures and functions. Caveats: a) The mixed mode will not work for stored functions: in mixed mode, a stored function will always be binlogged as one call and in a statement-based way (e.g. INSERT VALUES(myfunc()) or SELECT myfunc()). b) for the same reason, changing the thread's binlog format inside a stored function is refused with an error message. c) the same problems apply to triggers; implementing b) for triggers will be done later (will ask Dmitri). Additionally, as the binlog format is now changeable by each user for his session, I remove the implication which was done at startup, where row-based automatically set log-bin-trust-routine-creators to 1 (not possible anymore as a user can now switch to stmt-based and do nasty things again), and automatically set --innodb-locks-unsafe-for-binlog to 1 (was anyway theoretically incorrect as it disabled phantom protection). Plus fixes for compiler warnings.
2006-02-25 22:21:03 +01:00
# Test of CREATE TABLE SELECT
* Mixed replication mode * : 1) Fix for BUG#19630 "stored function inserting into two auto_increment breaks statement-based binlog": a stored function inserting into two such tables may fail to replicate (inserting wrong data in the slave's copy of the second table) if the slave's second table had an internal auto_increment counter different from master's. Because the auto_increment value autogenerated by master for the 2nd table does not go into binlog, only the first does, so the slave lacks information. To fix this, if running in mixed binlogging mode, if the stored function or trigger plans to update two different tables both having auto_increment columns, we switch to row-based for the whole function. We don't have a simple solution for statement-based binlogging mode, there the bug remains and will be documented as a known problem. Re-enabling rpl_switch_stm_row_mixed. 2) Fix for BUG#20630 "Mixed binlogging mode does not work with stored functions, triggers, views", which was a documented limitation (in mixed mode, we didn't detect that a stored function's execution needed row-based binlogging (due to some UUID() call for example); same for triggers, same for views (a view created from a SELECT UUID(), and doing INSERT INTO sometable SELECT theview; would not replicate row-based). This is implemented by, after parsing a routine's body, remembering in sp_head that this routine needs row-based binlogging. Then when this routine is used, the caller is marked to require row-based binlogging too. Same for views: when we parse a view and detect that its SELECT needs row-based binary logging, we mark the calling LEX as such. 3) Fix for BUG#20499 "mixed mode with temporary table breaks binlog": a temporary table containing e.g. UUID has its changes not binlogged, so any query updating a permanent table with data from the temporary table will run wrongly on slave. Solution: in mixed mode we don't switch back from row-based to statement-based when there exists temporary tables. 4) Attempt to test mysqlbinlog on a binlog generated by mysqlbinlog; impossible due to BUG#11312 and BUG#20329, but test is in place for when they are fixed.
2006-07-09 17:00:47 +02:00
create table t2 select rpad(UUID(),100,' ');
create table t3 select 1 union select UUID();
create table t4 select * from t1 where 3 in (select 1 union select 2 union select UUID() union select 3);
create table t5 select * from t1 where 3 in (select 1 union select 2 union select curdate() union select 3);
# what if UUID() is first:
insert into t5 select UUID() from t1 where 3 in (select 1 union select 2 union select 3 union select * from t4);
* Mixed replication mode * : 1) Fix for BUG#19630 "stored function inserting into two auto_increment breaks statement-based binlog": a stored function inserting into two such tables may fail to replicate (inserting wrong data in the slave's copy of the second table) if the slave's second table had an internal auto_increment counter different from master's. Because the auto_increment value autogenerated by master for the 2nd table does not go into binlog, only the first does, so the slave lacks information. To fix this, if running in mixed binlogging mode, if the stored function or trigger plans to update two different tables both having auto_increment columns, we switch to row-based for the whole function. We don't have a simple solution for statement-based binlogging mode, there the bug remains and will be documented as a known problem. Re-enabling rpl_switch_stm_row_mixed. 2) Fix for BUG#20630 "Mixed binlogging mode does not work with stored functions, triggers, views", which was a documented limitation (in mixed mode, we didn't detect that a stored function's execution needed row-based binlogging (due to some UUID() call for example); same for triggers, same for views (a view created from a SELECT UUID(), and doing INSERT INTO sometable SELECT theview; would not replicate row-based). This is implemented by, after parsing a routine's body, remembering in sp_head that this routine needs row-based binlogging. Then when this routine is used, the caller is marked to require row-based binlogging too. Same for views: when we parse a view and detect that its SELECT needs row-based binary logging, we mark the calling LEX as such. 3) Fix for BUG#20499 "mixed mode with temporary table breaks binlog": a temporary table containing e.g. UUID has its changes not binlogged, so any query updating a permanent table with data from the temporary table will run wrongly on slave. Solution: in mixed mode we don't switch back from row-based to statement-based when there exists temporary tables. 4) Attempt to test mysqlbinlog on a binlog generated by mysqlbinlog; impossible due to BUG#11312 and BUG#20329, but test is in place for when they are fixed.
2006-07-09 17:00:47 +02:00
# inside a stored procedure
WL#2977 and WL#2712 global and session-level variable to set the binlog format (row/statement), and new binlog format called "mixed" (which is statement-based except if only row-based is correct, in this cset it means if UDF or UUID is used; more cases could be added in later 5.1 release): SET GLOBAL|SESSION BINLOG_FORMAT=row|statement|mixed|default; the global default is statement unless cluster is enabled (then it's row) as in 5.1-alpha. It's not possible to use SET on this variable if a session is currently in row-based mode and has open temporary tables (because CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE was not binlogged so temp table is not known on slave), or if NDB is enabled (because NDB does not support such change on-the-fly, though it will later), of if in a stored function (see below). The added tests test the possibility or impossibility to SET, their effects, and the mixed mode, including in prepared statements and in stored procedures and functions. Caveats: a) The mixed mode will not work for stored functions: in mixed mode, a stored function will always be binlogged as one call and in a statement-based way (e.g. INSERT VALUES(myfunc()) or SELECT myfunc()). b) for the same reason, changing the thread's binlog format inside a stored function is refused with an error message. c) the same problems apply to triggers; implementing b) for triggers will be done later (will ask Dmitri). Additionally, as the binlog format is now changeable by each user for his session, I remove the implication which was done at startup, where row-based automatically set log-bin-trust-routine-creators to 1 (not possible anymore as a user can now switch to stmt-based and do nasty things again), and automatically set --innodb-locks-unsafe-for-binlog to 1 (was anyway theoretically incorrect as it disabled phantom protection). Plus fixes for compiler warnings.
2006-02-25 22:21:03 +01:00
delimiter |;
create procedure foo()
begin
* Mixed replication mode * : 1) Fix for BUG#19630 "stored function inserting into two auto_increment breaks statement-based binlog": a stored function inserting into two such tables may fail to replicate (inserting wrong data in the slave's copy of the second table) if the slave's second table had an internal auto_increment counter different from master's. Because the auto_increment value autogenerated by master for the 2nd table does not go into binlog, only the first does, so the slave lacks information. To fix this, if running in mixed binlogging mode, if the stored function or trigger plans to update two different tables both having auto_increment columns, we switch to row-based for the whole function. We don't have a simple solution for statement-based binlogging mode, there the bug remains and will be documented as a known problem. Re-enabling rpl_switch_stm_row_mixed. 2) Fix for BUG#20630 "Mixed binlogging mode does not work with stored functions, triggers, views", which was a documented limitation (in mixed mode, we didn't detect that a stored function's execution needed row-based binlogging (due to some UUID() call for example); same for triggers, same for views (a view created from a SELECT UUID(), and doing INSERT INTO sometable SELECT theview; would not replicate row-based). This is implemented by, after parsing a routine's body, remembering in sp_head that this routine needs row-based binlogging. Then when this routine is used, the caller is marked to require row-based binlogging too. Same for views: when we parse a view and detect that its SELECT needs row-based binary logging, we mark the calling LEX as such. 3) Fix for BUG#20499 "mixed mode with temporary table breaks binlog": a temporary table containing e.g. UUID has its changes not binlogged, so any query updating a permanent table with data from the temporary table will run wrongly on slave. Solution: in mixed mode we don't switch back from row-based to statement-based when there exists temporary tables. 4) Attempt to test mysqlbinlog on a binlog generated by mysqlbinlog; impossible due to BUG#11312 and BUG#20329, but test is in place for when they are fixed.
2006-07-09 17:00:47 +02:00
insert into t1 values("work_25_");
insert into t1 values(concat("for_26_",UUID()));
insert into t1 select "yesterday_27_";
WL#2977 and WL#2712 global and session-level variable to set the binlog format (row/statement), and new binlog format called "mixed" (which is statement-based except if only row-based is correct, in this cset it means if UDF or UUID is used; more cases could be added in later 5.1 release): SET GLOBAL|SESSION BINLOG_FORMAT=row|statement|mixed|default; the global default is statement unless cluster is enabled (then it's row) as in 5.1-alpha. It's not possible to use SET on this variable if a session is currently in row-based mode and has open temporary tables (because CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE was not binlogged so temp table is not known on slave), or if NDB is enabled (because NDB does not support such change on-the-fly, though it will later), of if in a stored function (see below). The added tests test the possibility or impossibility to SET, their effects, and the mixed mode, including in prepared statements and in stored procedures and functions. Caveats: a) The mixed mode will not work for stored functions: in mixed mode, a stored function will always be binlogged as one call and in a statement-based way (e.g. INSERT VALUES(myfunc()) or SELECT myfunc()). b) for the same reason, changing the thread's binlog format inside a stored function is refused with an error message. c) the same problems apply to triggers; implementing b) for triggers will be done later (will ask Dmitri). Additionally, as the binlog format is now changeable by each user for his session, I remove the implication which was done at startup, where row-based automatically set log-bin-trust-routine-creators to 1 (not possible anymore as a user can now switch to stmt-based and do nasty things again), and automatically set --innodb-locks-unsafe-for-binlog to 1 (was anyway theoretically incorrect as it disabled phantom protection). Plus fixes for compiler warnings.
2006-02-25 22:21:03 +01:00
end|
create procedure foo2()
begin
* Mixed replication mode * : 1) Fix for BUG#19630 "stored function inserting into two auto_increment breaks statement-based binlog": a stored function inserting into two such tables may fail to replicate (inserting wrong data in the slave's copy of the second table) if the slave's second table had an internal auto_increment counter different from master's. Because the auto_increment value autogenerated by master for the 2nd table does not go into binlog, only the first does, so the slave lacks information. To fix this, if running in mixed binlogging mode, if the stored function or trigger plans to update two different tables both having auto_increment columns, we switch to row-based for the whole function. We don't have a simple solution for statement-based binlogging mode, there the bug remains and will be documented as a known problem. Re-enabling rpl_switch_stm_row_mixed. 2) Fix for BUG#20630 "Mixed binlogging mode does not work with stored functions, triggers, views", which was a documented limitation (in mixed mode, we didn't detect that a stored function's execution needed row-based binlogging (due to some UUID() call for example); same for triggers, same for views (a view created from a SELECT UUID(), and doing INSERT INTO sometable SELECT theview; would not replicate row-based). This is implemented by, after parsing a routine's body, remembering in sp_head that this routine needs row-based binlogging. Then when this routine is used, the caller is marked to require row-based binlogging too. Same for views: when we parse a view and detect that its SELECT needs row-based binary logging, we mark the calling LEX as such. 3) Fix for BUG#20499 "mixed mode with temporary table breaks binlog": a temporary table containing e.g. UUID has its changes not binlogged, so any query updating a permanent table with data from the temporary table will run wrongly on slave. Solution: in mixed mode we don't switch back from row-based to statement-based when there exists temporary tables. 4) Attempt to test mysqlbinlog on a binlog generated by mysqlbinlog; impossible due to BUG#11312 and BUG#20329, but test is in place for when they are fixed.
2006-07-09 17:00:47 +02:00
insert into t1 values(concat("emergency_28_",UUID()));
insert into t1 values("work_29_");
insert into t1 values(concat("for_30_",UUID()));
WL#2977 and WL#2712 global and session-level variable to set the binlog format (row/statement), and new binlog format called "mixed" (which is statement-based except if only row-based is correct, in this cset it means if UDF or UUID is used; more cases could be added in later 5.1 release): SET GLOBAL|SESSION BINLOG_FORMAT=row|statement|mixed|default; the global default is statement unless cluster is enabled (then it's row) as in 5.1-alpha. It's not possible to use SET on this variable if a session is currently in row-based mode and has open temporary tables (because CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE was not binlogged so temp table is not known on slave), or if NDB is enabled (because NDB does not support such change on-the-fly, though it will later), of if in a stored function (see below). The added tests test the possibility or impossibility to SET, their effects, and the mixed mode, including in prepared statements and in stored procedures and functions. Caveats: a) The mixed mode will not work for stored functions: in mixed mode, a stored function will always be binlogged as one call and in a statement-based way (e.g. INSERT VALUES(myfunc()) or SELECT myfunc()). b) for the same reason, changing the thread's binlog format inside a stored function is refused with an error message. c) the same problems apply to triggers; implementing b) for triggers will be done later (will ask Dmitri). Additionally, as the binlog format is now changeable by each user for his session, I remove the implication which was done at startup, where row-based automatically set log-bin-trust-routine-creators to 1 (not possible anymore as a user can now switch to stmt-based and do nasty things again), and automatically set --innodb-locks-unsafe-for-binlog to 1 (was anyway theoretically incorrect as it disabled phantom protection). Plus fixes for compiler warnings.
2006-02-25 22:21:03 +01:00
set session binlog_format=row; # accepted for stored procs
* Mixed replication mode * : 1) Fix for BUG#19630 "stored function inserting into two auto_increment breaks statement-based binlog": a stored function inserting into two such tables may fail to replicate (inserting wrong data in the slave's copy of the second table) if the slave's second table had an internal auto_increment counter different from master's. Because the auto_increment value autogenerated by master for the 2nd table does not go into binlog, only the first does, so the slave lacks information. To fix this, if running in mixed binlogging mode, if the stored function or trigger plans to update two different tables both having auto_increment columns, we switch to row-based for the whole function. We don't have a simple solution for statement-based binlogging mode, there the bug remains and will be documented as a known problem. Re-enabling rpl_switch_stm_row_mixed. 2) Fix for BUG#20630 "Mixed binlogging mode does not work with stored functions, triggers, views", which was a documented limitation (in mixed mode, we didn't detect that a stored function's execution needed row-based binlogging (due to some UUID() call for example); same for triggers, same for views (a view created from a SELECT UUID(), and doing INSERT INTO sometable SELECT theview; would not replicate row-based). This is implemented by, after parsing a routine's body, remembering in sp_head that this routine needs row-based binlogging. Then when this routine is used, the caller is marked to require row-based binlogging too. Same for views: when we parse a view and detect that its SELECT needs row-based binary logging, we mark the calling LEX as such. 3) Fix for BUG#20499 "mixed mode with temporary table breaks binlog": a temporary table containing e.g. UUID has its changes not binlogged, so any query updating a permanent table with data from the temporary table will run wrongly on slave. Solution: in mixed mode we don't switch back from row-based to statement-based when there exists temporary tables. 4) Attempt to test mysqlbinlog on a binlog generated by mysqlbinlog; impossible due to BUG#11312 and BUG#20329, but test is in place for when they are fixed.
2006-07-09 17:00:47 +02:00
insert into t1 values("more work_31_");
WL#2977 and WL#2712 global and session-level variable to set the binlog format (row/statement), and new binlog format called "mixed" (which is statement-based except if only row-based is correct, in this cset it means if UDF or UUID is used; more cases could be added in later 5.1 release): SET GLOBAL|SESSION BINLOG_FORMAT=row|statement|mixed|default; the global default is statement unless cluster is enabled (then it's row) as in 5.1-alpha. It's not possible to use SET on this variable if a session is currently in row-based mode and has open temporary tables (because CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE was not binlogged so temp table is not known on slave), or if NDB is enabled (because NDB does not support such change on-the-fly, though it will later), of if in a stored function (see below). The added tests test the possibility or impossibility to SET, their effects, and the mixed mode, including in prepared statements and in stored procedures and functions. Caveats: a) The mixed mode will not work for stored functions: in mixed mode, a stored function will always be binlogged as one call and in a statement-based way (e.g. INSERT VALUES(myfunc()) or SELECT myfunc()). b) for the same reason, changing the thread's binlog format inside a stored function is refused with an error message. c) the same problems apply to triggers; implementing b) for triggers will be done later (will ask Dmitri). Additionally, as the binlog format is now changeable by each user for his session, I remove the implication which was done at startup, where row-based automatically set log-bin-trust-routine-creators to 1 (not possible anymore as a user can now switch to stmt-based and do nasty things again), and automatically set --innodb-locks-unsafe-for-binlog to 1 (was anyway theoretically incorrect as it disabled phantom protection). Plus fixes for compiler warnings.
2006-02-25 22:21:03 +01:00
set session binlog_format=mixed;
end|
create function foo3() returns bigint unsigned
begin
set session binlog_format=row; # rejected for stored funcs
insert into t1 values("alarm");
return 100;
end|
* Mixed replication mode * : 1) Fix for BUG#19630 "stored function inserting into two auto_increment breaks statement-based binlog": a stored function inserting into two such tables may fail to replicate (inserting wrong data in the slave's copy of the second table) if the slave's second table had an internal auto_increment counter different from master's. Because the auto_increment value autogenerated by master for the 2nd table does not go into binlog, only the first does, so the slave lacks information. To fix this, if running in mixed binlogging mode, if the stored function or trigger plans to update two different tables both having auto_increment columns, we switch to row-based for the whole function. We don't have a simple solution for statement-based binlogging mode, there the bug remains and will be documented as a known problem. Re-enabling rpl_switch_stm_row_mixed. 2) Fix for BUG#20630 "Mixed binlogging mode does not work with stored functions, triggers, views", which was a documented limitation (in mixed mode, we didn't detect that a stored function's execution needed row-based binlogging (due to some UUID() call for example); same for triggers, same for views (a view created from a SELECT UUID(), and doing INSERT INTO sometable SELECT theview; would not replicate row-based). This is implemented by, after parsing a routine's body, remembering in sp_head that this routine needs row-based binlogging. Then when this routine is used, the caller is marked to require row-based binlogging too. Same for views: when we parse a view and detect that its SELECT needs row-based binary logging, we mark the calling LEX as such. 3) Fix for BUG#20499 "mixed mode with temporary table breaks binlog": a temporary table containing e.g. UUID has its changes not binlogged, so any query updating a permanent table with data from the temporary table will run wrongly on slave. Solution: in mixed mode we don't switch back from row-based to statement-based when there exists temporary tables. 4) Attempt to test mysqlbinlog on a binlog generated by mysqlbinlog; impossible due to BUG#11312 and BUG#20329, but test is in place for when they are fixed.
2006-07-09 17:00:47 +02:00
create procedure foo4(x varchar(100))
begin
insert into t1 values(concat("work_250_",x));
insert into t1 select "yesterday_270_";
end|
WL#2977 and WL#2712 global and session-level variable to set the binlog format (row/statement), and new binlog format called "mixed" (which is statement-based except if only row-based is correct, in this cset it means if UDF or UUID is used; more cases could be added in later 5.1 release): SET GLOBAL|SESSION BINLOG_FORMAT=row|statement|mixed|default; the global default is statement unless cluster is enabled (then it's row) as in 5.1-alpha. It's not possible to use SET on this variable if a session is currently in row-based mode and has open temporary tables (because CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE was not binlogged so temp table is not known on slave), or if NDB is enabled (because NDB does not support such change on-the-fly, though it will later), of if in a stored function (see below). The added tests test the possibility or impossibility to SET, their effects, and the mixed mode, including in prepared statements and in stored procedures and functions. Caveats: a) The mixed mode will not work for stored functions: in mixed mode, a stored function will always be binlogged as one call and in a statement-based way (e.g. INSERT VALUES(myfunc()) or SELECT myfunc()). b) for the same reason, changing the thread's binlog format inside a stored function is refused with an error message. c) the same problems apply to triggers; implementing b) for triggers will be done later (will ask Dmitri). Additionally, as the binlog format is now changeable by each user for his session, I remove the implication which was done at startup, where row-based automatically set log-bin-trust-routine-creators to 1 (not possible anymore as a user can now switch to stmt-based and do nasty things again), and automatically set --innodb-locks-unsafe-for-binlog to 1 (was anyway theoretically incorrect as it disabled phantom protection). Plus fixes for compiler warnings.
2006-02-25 22:21:03 +01:00
delimiter ;|
call foo();
call foo2();
* Mixed replication mode * : 1) Fix for BUG#19630 "stored function inserting into two auto_increment breaks statement-based binlog": a stored function inserting into two such tables may fail to replicate (inserting wrong data in the slave's copy of the second table) if the slave's second table had an internal auto_increment counter different from master's. Because the auto_increment value autogenerated by master for the 2nd table does not go into binlog, only the first does, so the slave lacks information. To fix this, if running in mixed binlogging mode, if the stored function or trigger plans to update two different tables both having auto_increment columns, we switch to row-based for the whole function. We don't have a simple solution for statement-based binlogging mode, there the bug remains and will be documented as a known problem. Re-enabling rpl_switch_stm_row_mixed. 2) Fix for BUG#20630 "Mixed binlogging mode does not work with stored functions, triggers, views", which was a documented limitation (in mixed mode, we didn't detect that a stored function's execution needed row-based binlogging (due to some UUID() call for example); same for triggers, same for views (a view created from a SELECT UUID(), and doing INSERT INTO sometable SELECT theview; would not replicate row-based). This is implemented by, after parsing a routine's body, remembering in sp_head that this routine needs row-based binlogging. Then when this routine is used, the caller is marked to require row-based binlogging too. Same for views: when we parse a view and detect that its SELECT needs row-based binary logging, we mark the calling LEX as such. 3) Fix for BUG#20499 "mixed mode with temporary table breaks binlog": a temporary table containing e.g. UUID has its changes not binlogged, so any query updating a permanent table with data from the temporary table will run wrongly on slave. Solution: in mixed mode we don't switch back from row-based to statement-based when there exists temporary tables. 4) Attempt to test mysqlbinlog on a binlog generated by mysqlbinlog; impossible due to BUG#11312 and BUG#20329, but test is in place for when they are fixed.
2006-07-09 17:00:47 +02:00
call foo4("hello");
call foo4(UUID());
call foo4("world");
WL#2977 and WL#2712 global and session-level variable to set the binlog format (row/statement), and new binlog format called "mixed" (which is statement-based except if only row-based is correct, in this cset it means if UDF or UUID is used; more cases could be added in later 5.1 release): SET GLOBAL|SESSION BINLOG_FORMAT=row|statement|mixed|default; the global default is statement unless cluster is enabled (then it's row) as in 5.1-alpha. It's not possible to use SET on this variable if a session is currently in row-based mode and has open temporary tables (because CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE was not binlogged so temp table is not known on slave), or if NDB is enabled (because NDB does not support such change on-the-fly, though it will later), of if in a stored function (see below). The added tests test the possibility or impossibility to SET, their effects, and the mixed mode, including in prepared statements and in stored procedures and functions. Caveats: a) The mixed mode will not work for stored functions: in mixed mode, a stored function will always be binlogged as one call and in a statement-based way (e.g. INSERT VALUES(myfunc()) or SELECT myfunc()). b) for the same reason, changing the thread's binlog format inside a stored function is refused with an error message. c) the same problems apply to triggers; implementing b) for triggers will be done later (will ask Dmitri). Additionally, as the binlog format is now changeable by each user for his session, I remove the implication which was done at startup, where row-based automatically set log-bin-trust-routine-creators to 1 (not possible anymore as a user can now switch to stmt-based and do nasty things again), and automatically set --innodb-locks-unsafe-for-binlog to 1 (was anyway theoretically incorrect as it disabled phantom protection). Plus fixes for compiler warnings.
2006-02-25 22:21:03 +01:00
# test that can't SET in a stored function
WL#2977 and WL#2712 global and session-level variable to set the binlog format (row/statement), and new binlog format called "mixed" (which is statement-based except if only row-based is correct, in this cset it means if UDF or UUID is used; more cases could be added in later 5.1 release): SET GLOBAL|SESSION BINLOG_FORMAT=row|statement|mixed|default; the global default is statement unless cluster is enabled (then it's row) as in 5.1-alpha. It's not possible to use SET on this variable if a session is currently in row-based mode and has open temporary tables (because CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE was not binlogged so temp table is not known on slave), or if NDB is enabled (because NDB does not support such change on-the-fly, though it will later), of if in a stored function (see below). The added tests test the possibility or impossibility to SET, their effects, and the mixed mode, including in prepared statements and in stored procedures and functions. Caveats: a) The mixed mode will not work for stored functions: in mixed mode, a stored function will always be binlogged as one call and in a statement-based way (e.g. INSERT VALUES(myfunc()) or SELECT myfunc()). b) for the same reason, changing the thread's binlog format inside a stored function is refused with an error message. c) the same problems apply to triggers; implementing b) for triggers will be done later (will ask Dmitri). Additionally, as the binlog format is now changeable by each user for his session, I remove the implication which was done at startup, where row-based automatically set log-bin-trust-routine-creators to 1 (not possible anymore as a user can now switch to stmt-based and do nasty things again), and automatically set --innodb-locks-unsafe-for-binlog to 1 (was anyway theoretically incorrect as it disabled phantom protection). Plus fixes for compiler warnings.
2006-02-25 22:21:03 +01:00
--error ER_STORED_FUNCTION_PREVENTS_SWITCH_BINLOG_FORMAT
select foo3();
select * from t1 where a="alarm";
* Mixed replication mode * : 1) Fix for BUG#19630 "stored function inserting into two auto_increment breaks statement-based binlog": a stored function inserting into two such tables may fail to replicate (inserting wrong data in the slave's copy of the second table) if the slave's second table had an internal auto_increment counter different from master's. Because the auto_increment value autogenerated by master for the 2nd table does not go into binlog, only the first does, so the slave lacks information. To fix this, if running in mixed binlogging mode, if the stored function or trigger plans to update two different tables both having auto_increment columns, we switch to row-based for the whole function. We don't have a simple solution for statement-based binlogging mode, there the bug remains and will be documented as a known problem. Re-enabling rpl_switch_stm_row_mixed. 2) Fix for BUG#20630 "Mixed binlogging mode does not work with stored functions, triggers, views", which was a documented limitation (in mixed mode, we didn't detect that a stored function's execution needed row-based binlogging (due to some UUID() call for example); same for triggers, same for views (a view created from a SELECT UUID(), and doing INSERT INTO sometable SELECT theview; would not replicate row-based). This is implemented by, after parsing a routine's body, remembering in sp_head that this routine needs row-based binlogging. Then when this routine is used, the caller is marked to require row-based binlogging too. Same for views: when we parse a view and detect that its SELECT needs row-based binary logging, we mark the calling LEX as such. 3) Fix for BUG#20499 "mixed mode with temporary table breaks binlog": a temporary table containing e.g. UUID has its changes not binlogged, so any query updating a permanent table with data from the temporary table will run wrongly on slave. Solution: in mixed mode we don't switch back from row-based to statement-based when there exists temporary tables. 4) Attempt to test mysqlbinlog on a binlog generated by mysqlbinlog; impossible due to BUG#11312 and BUG#20329, but test is in place for when they are fixed.
2006-07-09 17:00:47 +02:00
# Tests of stored functions/triggers/views for BUG#20930 "Mixed
# binlogging mode does not work with stored functions, triggers,
# views"
# Function which calls procedure
drop function foo3;
delimiter |;
create function foo3() returns bigint unsigned
begin
insert into t1 values("foo3_32_");
call foo();
return 100;
end|
delimiter ;|
insert into t2 select foo3();
prepare stmt1 from 'insert into t2 select foo3()';
execute stmt1;
execute stmt1;
deallocate prepare stmt1;
# Test if stored function calls stored function which calls procedure
# which requires row-based.
delimiter |;
create function foo4() returns bigint unsigned
begin
insert into t2 select foo3();
return 100;
end|
delimiter ;|
select foo4();
prepare stmt1 from 'select foo4()';
execute stmt1;
execute stmt1;
deallocate prepare stmt1;
# A simple stored function
delimiter |;
create function foo5() returns bigint unsigned
begin
insert into t2 select UUID();
return 100;
end|
delimiter ;|
select foo5();
prepare stmt1 from 'select foo5()';
execute stmt1;
execute stmt1;
deallocate prepare stmt1;
# A simple stored function where UUID() is in the argument
delimiter |;
create function foo6(x varchar(100)) returns bigint unsigned
begin
insert into t2 select x;
return 100;
end|
delimiter ;|
select foo6("foo6_1_");
select foo6(concat("foo6_2_",UUID()));
prepare stmt1 from 'select foo6(concat("foo6_3_",UUID()))';
execute stmt1;
execute stmt1;
deallocate prepare stmt1;
# Test of views using UUID()
create view v1 as select uuid();
create table t11 (data varchar(255));
insert into t11 select * from v1;
# Test of querying INFORMATION_SCHEMA which parses the view's body,
# to verify that it binlogs statement-based (is not polluted by
# the parsing of the view's body).
insert into t11 select TABLE_NAME from INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES where TABLE_SCHEMA='mysqltest1' and TABLE_NAME IN ('v1','t11');
prepare stmt1 from "insert into t11 select TABLE_NAME from INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES where TABLE_SCHEMA='mysqltest1' and TABLE_NAME IN ('v1','t11')";
execute stmt1;
execute stmt1;
deallocate prepare stmt1;
# Test of triggers with UUID()
delimiter |;
create trigger t11_bi before insert on t11 for each row
begin
set NEW.data = concat(NEW.data,UUID());
end|
delimiter ;|
insert into t11 values("try_560_");
2006-07-09 21:39:21 +02:00
# Test that INSERT DELAYED works in mixed mode (BUG#20649)
insert delayed into t2 values("delay_1_");
insert delayed into t2 values(concat("delay_2_",UUID()));
insert delayed into t2 values("delay_6_");
# Test for BUG#20633 (INSERT DELAYED RAND()/user_variable does not
# replicate fine in statement-based ; we test that in mixed mode it
# works).
2006-07-09 21:39:21 +02:00
insert delayed into t2 values(rand());
set @a=2.345;
2006-07-09 21:39:21 +02:00
insert delayed into t2 values(@a);
sleep 4; # time for the delayed inserts to reach disk
# If you want to do manual testing of the mixed mode regarding UDFs (not
# testable automatically as quite platform- and compiler-dependent),
# you just need to set the variable below to 1, and to
# "make udf_example.so" in sql/, and to copy sql/udf_example.so to
# MYSQL_TEST_DIR/lib/mysql.
let $you_want_to_test_UDF=0;
if ($you_want_to_test_UDF)
{
CREATE FUNCTION metaphon RETURNS STRING SONAME 'udf_example.so';
prepare stmt1 from 'insert into t1 select metaphon(?)';
* Mixed replication mode * : 1) Fix for BUG#19630 "stored function inserting into two auto_increment breaks statement-based binlog": a stored function inserting into two such tables may fail to replicate (inserting wrong data in the slave's copy of the second table) if the slave's second table had an internal auto_increment counter different from master's. Because the auto_increment value autogenerated by master for the 2nd table does not go into binlog, only the first does, so the slave lacks information. To fix this, if running in mixed binlogging mode, if the stored function or trigger plans to update two different tables both having auto_increment columns, we switch to row-based for the whole function. We don't have a simple solution for statement-based binlogging mode, there the bug remains and will be documented as a known problem. Re-enabling rpl_switch_stm_row_mixed. 2) Fix for BUG#20630 "Mixed binlogging mode does not work with stored functions, triggers, views", which was a documented limitation (in mixed mode, we didn't detect that a stored function's execution needed row-based binlogging (due to some UUID() call for example); same for triggers, same for views (a view created from a SELECT UUID(), and doing INSERT INTO sometable SELECT theview; would not replicate row-based). This is implemented by, after parsing a routine's body, remembering in sp_head that this routine needs row-based binlogging. Then when this routine is used, the caller is marked to require row-based binlogging too. Same for views: when we parse a view and detect that its SELECT needs row-based binary logging, we mark the calling LEX as such. 3) Fix for BUG#20499 "mixed mode with temporary table breaks binlog": a temporary table containing e.g. UUID has its changes not binlogged, so any query updating a permanent table with data from the temporary table will run wrongly on slave. Solution: in mixed mode we don't switch back from row-based to statement-based when there exists temporary tables. 4) Attempt to test mysqlbinlog on a binlog generated by mysqlbinlog; impossible due to BUG#11312 and BUG#20329, but test is in place for when they are fixed.
2006-07-09 17:00:47 +02:00
set @string="emergency_133_";
insert into t1 values("work_134_");
execute stmt1 using @string;
deallocate prepare stmt1;
prepare stmt1 from 'insert into t1 select ?';
* Mixed replication mode * : 1) Fix for BUG#19630 "stored function inserting into two auto_increment breaks statement-based binlog": a stored function inserting into two such tables may fail to replicate (inserting wrong data in the slave's copy of the second table) if the slave's second table had an internal auto_increment counter different from master's. Because the auto_increment value autogenerated by master for the 2nd table does not go into binlog, only the first does, so the slave lacks information. To fix this, if running in mixed binlogging mode, if the stored function or trigger plans to update two different tables both having auto_increment columns, we switch to row-based for the whole function. We don't have a simple solution for statement-based binlogging mode, there the bug remains and will be documented as a known problem. Re-enabling rpl_switch_stm_row_mixed. 2) Fix for BUG#20630 "Mixed binlogging mode does not work with stored functions, triggers, views", which was a documented limitation (in mixed mode, we didn't detect that a stored function's execution needed row-based binlogging (due to some UUID() call for example); same for triggers, same for views (a view created from a SELECT UUID(), and doing INSERT INTO sometable SELECT theview; would not replicate row-based). This is implemented by, after parsing a routine's body, remembering in sp_head that this routine needs row-based binlogging. Then when this routine is used, the caller is marked to require row-based binlogging too. Same for views: when we parse a view and detect that its SELECT needs row-based binary logging, we mark the calling LEX as such. 3) Fix for BUG#20499 "mixed mode with temporary table breaks binlog": a temporary table containing e.g. UUID has its changes not binlogged, so any query updating a permanent table with data from the temporary table will run wrongly on slave. Solution: in mixed mode we don't switch back from row-based to statement-based when there exists temporary tables. 4) Attempt to test mysqlbinlog on a binlog generated by mysqlbinlog; impossible due to BUG#11312 and BUG#20329, but test is in place for when they are fixed.
2006-07-09 17:00:47 +02:00
insert into t1 values(metaphon("work_135_"));
execute stmt1 using @string;
deallocate prepare stmt1;
* Mixed replication mode * : 1) Fix for BUG#19630 "stored function inserting into two auto_increment breaks statement-based binlog": a stored function inserting into two such tables may fail to replicate (inserting wrong data in the slave's copy of the second table) if the slave's second table had an internal auto_increment counter different from master's. Because the auto_increment value autogenerated by master for the 2nd table does not go into binlog, only the first does, so the slave lacks information. To fix this, if running in mixed binlogging mode, if the stored function or trigger plans to update two different tables both having auto_increment columns, we switch to row-based for the whole function. We don't have a simple solution for statement-based binlogging mode, there the bug remains and will be documented as a known problem. Re-enabling rpl_switch_stm_row_mixed. 2) Fix for BUG#20630 "Mixed binlogging mode does not work with stored functions, triggers, views", which was a documented limitation (in mixed mode, we didn't detect that a stored function's execution needed row-based binlogging (due to some UUID() call for example); same for triggers, same for views (a view created from a SELECT UUID(), and doing INSERT INTO sometable SELECT theview; would not replicate row-based). This is implemented by, after parsing a routine's body, remembering in sp_head that this routine needs row-based binlogging. Then when this routine is used, the caller is marked to require row-based binlogging too. Same for views: when we parse a view and detect that its SELECT needs row-based binary logging, we mark the calling LEX as such. 3) Fix for BUG#20499 "mixed mode with temporary table breaks binlog": a temporary table containing e.g. UUID has its changes not binlogged, so any query updating a permanent table with data from the temporary table will run wrongly on slave. Solution: in mixed mode we don't switch back from row-based to statement-based when there exists temporary tables. 4) Attempt to test mysqlbinlog on a binlog generated by mysqlbinlog; impossible due to BUG#11312 and BUG#20329, but test is in place for when they are fixed.
2006-07-09 17:00:47 +02:00
insert into t1 values(metaphon("for_136_"));
insert into t1 select "yesterday_137_";
create table t6 select metaphon("for_138_");
create table t7 select 1 union select metaphon("for_139_");
create table t8 select * from t1 where 3 in (select 1 union select 2 union select metaphon("for_140_") union select 3);
create table t9 select * from t1 where 3 in (select 1 union select 2 union select curdate() union select 3);
}
* Mixed replication mode * : 1) Fix for BUG#19630 "stored function inserting into two auto_increment breaks statement-based binlog": a stored function inserting into two such tables may fail to replicate (inserting wrong data in the slave's copy of the second table) if the slave's second table had an internal auto_increment counter different from master's. Because the auto_increment value autogenerated by master for the 2nd table does not go into binlog, only the first does, so the slave lacks information. To fix this, if running in mixed binlogging mode, if the stored function or trigger plans to update two different tables both having auto_increment columns, we switch to row-based for the whole function. We don't have a simple solution for statement-based binlogging mode, there the bug remains and will be documented as a known problem. Re-enabling rpl_switch_stm_row_mixed. 2) Fix for BUG#20630 "Mixed binlogging mode does not work with stored functions, triggers, views", which was a documented limitation (in mixed mode, we didn't detect that a stored function's execution needed row-based binlogging (due to some UUID() call for example); same for triggers, same for views (a view created from a SELECT UUID(), and doing INSERT INTO sometable SELECT theview; would not replicate row-based). This is implemented by, after parsing a routine's body, remembering in sp_head that this routine needs row-based binlogging. Then when this routine is used, the caller is marked to require row-based binlogging too. Same for views: when we parse a view and detect that its SELECT needs row-based binary logging, we mark the calling LEX as such. 3) Fix for BUG#20499 "mixed mode with temporary table breaks binlog": a temporary table containing e.g. UUID has its changes not binlogged, so any query updating a permanent table with data from the temporary table will run wrongly on slave. Solution: in mixed mode we don't switch back from row-based to statement-based when there exists temporary tables. 4) Attempt to test mysqlbinlog on a binlog generated by mysqlbinlog; impossible due to BUG#11312 and BUG#20329, but test is in place for when they are fixed.
2006-07-09 17:00:47 +02:00
create table t20 select * from t1; # save for comparing later
create table t21 select * from t2;
create table t22 select * from t3;
drop table t1,t2,t3;
# This tests the fix to
# BUG#19630 stored function inserting into two auto_increment breaks statement-based binlog
# We verify that under the mixed binlog mode, a stored function
# modifying at least two tables having an auto_increment column,
# is binlogged row-based. Indeed in statement-based binlogging,
# only the auto_increment value generated for the first table
# is recorded in the binlog, the value generated for the 2nd table
# lacking.
create table t1 (a int primary key auto_increment, b varchar(100));
create table t2 (a int primary key auto_increment, b varchar(100));
create table t3 (b varchar(100));
delimiter |;
create function f (x varchar(100)) returns int deterministic
begin
insert into t1 values(null,x);
insert into t2 values(null,x);
return 1;
end|
delimiter ;|
select f("try_41_");
# Two operations which compensate each other except that their net
# effect is that they advance the auto_increment counter of t2 on slave:
sync_slave_with_master;
use mysqltest1;
insert into t2 values(2,null),(3,null),(4,null);
delete from t2 where a>=2;
connection master;
# this is the call which didn't replicate well
select f("try_42_");
sync_slave_with_master;
# now use prepared statement and test again, just to see that the RBB
# mode isn't set at PREPARE but at EXECUTE.
insert into t2 values(3,null),(4,null);
delete from t2 where a>=3;
connection master;
prepare stmt1 from 'select f(?)';
set @string="try_43_";
insert into t1 values(null,"try_44_"); # should be SBB
execute stmt1 using @string; # should be RBB
deallocate prepare stmt1;
sync_slave_with_master;
# verify that if only one table has auto_inc, it does not trigger RBB
# (we'll check in binlog further below)
connection master;
create table t12 select * from t1; # save for comparing later
drop table t1;
create table t1 (a int, b varchar(100), key(a));
select f("try_45_");
# restore table's key
create table t13 select * from t1;
drop table t1;
create table t1 (a int primary key auto_increment, b varchar(100));
# now test if it's two functions, each of them inserts in one table
drop function f;
# we need a unique key to have sorting of rows by mysqldump
create table t14 (unique (a)) select * from t2;
* Mixed replication mode * : 1) Fix for BUG#19630 "stored function inserting into two auto_increment breaks statement-based binlog": a stored function inserting into two such tables may fail to replicate (inserting wrong data in the slave's copy of the second table) if the slave's second table had an internal auto_increment counter different from master's. Because the auto_increment value autogenerated by master for the 2nd table does not go into binlog, only the first does, so the slave lacks information. To fix this, if running in mixed binlogging mode, if the stored function or trigger plans to update two different tables both having auto_increment columns, we switch to row-based for the whole function. We don't have a simple solution for statement-based binlogging mode, there the bug remains and will be documented as a known problem. Re-enabling rpl_switch_stm_row_mixed. 2) Fix for BUG#20630 "Mixed binlogging mode does not work with stored functions, triggers, views", which was a documented limitation (in mixed mode, we didn't detect that a stored function's execution needed row-based binlogging (due to some UUID() call for example); same for triggers, same for views (a view created from a SELECT UUID(), and doing INSERT INTO sometable SELECT theview; would not replicate row-based). This is implemented by, after parsing a routine's body, remembering in sp_head that this routine needs row-based binlogging. Then when this routine is used, the caller is marked to require row-based binlogging too. Same for views: when we parse a view and detect that its SELECT needs row-based binary logging, we mark the calling LEX as such. 3) Fix for BUG#20499 "mixed mode with temporary table breaks binlog": a temporary table containing e.g. UUID has its changes not binlogged, so any query updating a permanent table with data from the temporary table will run wrongly on slave. Solution: in mixed mode we don't switch back from row-based to statement-based when there exists temporary tables. 4) Attempt to test mysqlbinlog on a binlog generated by mysqlbinlog; impossible due to BUG#11312 and BUG#20329, but test is in place for when they are fixed.
2006-07-09 17:00:47 +02:00
truncate table t2;
delimiter |;
create function f1 (x varchar(100)) returns int deterministic
begin
insert into t1 values(null,x);
return 1;
end|
create function f2 (x varchar(100)) returns int deterministic
begin
insert into t2 values(null,x);
return 1;
end|
delimiter ;|
select f1("try_46_"),f2("try_47_");
sync_slave_with_master;
insert into t2 values(2,null),(3,null),(4,null);
delete from t2 where a>=2;
connection master;
# Test with SELECT and INSERT
select f1("try_48_"),f2("try_49_");
insert into t3 values(concat("try_50_",f1("try_51_"),f2("try_52_")));
sync_slave_with_master;
# verify that if f2 does only read on an auto_inc table, this does not
# switch to RBB
connection master;
drop function f2;
delimiter |;
create function f2 (x varchar(100)) returns int deterministic
begin
declare y int;
insert into t1 values(null,x);
set y = (select count(*) from t2);
return y;
end|
delimiter ;|
select f1("try_53_"),f2("try_54_");
sync_slave_with_master;
# And now, a normal statement with a trigger (no stored functions)
connection master;
drop function f2;
delimiter |;
create trigger t1_bi before insert on t1 for each row
begin
insert into t2 values(null,"try_55_");
end|
delimiter ;|
insert into t1 values(null,"try_56_");
# and now remove one auto_increment and verify SBB
alter table t1 modify a int, drop primary key;
insert into t1 values(null,"try_57_");
sync_slave_with_master;
# Test for BUG#20499 "mixed mode with temporary table breaks binlog"
# Slave used to have only 2 rows instead of 3.
connection master;
CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE t15 SELECT UUID();
create table t16 like t15;
INSERT INTO t16 SELECT * FROM t15;
# we'll verify that this one is done RBB
insert into t16 values("try_65_");
drop table t15;
# we'll verify that this one is done SBB
insert into t16 values("try_66_");
sync_slave_with_master;
WL#2977 and WL#2712 global and session-level variable to set the binlog format (row/statement), and new binlog format called "mixed" (which is statement-based except if only row-based is correct, in this cset it means if UDF or UUID is used; more cases could be added in later 5.1 release): SET GLOBAL|SESSION BINLOG_FORMAT=row|statement|mixed|default; the global default is statement unless cluster is enabled (then it's row) as in 5.1-alpha. It's not possible to use SET on this variable if a session is currently in row-based mode and has open temporary tables (because CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE was not binlogged so temp table is not known on slave), or if NDB is enabled (because NDB does not support such change on-the-fly, though it will later), of if in a stored function (see below). The added tests test the possibility or impossibility to SET, their effects, and the mixed mode, including in prepared statements and in stored procedures and functions. Caveats: a) The mixed mode will not work for stored functions: in mixed mode, a stored function will always be binlogged as one call and in a statement-based way (e.g. INSERT VALUES(myfunc()) or SELECT myfunc()). b) for the same reason, changing the thread's binlog format inside a stored function is refused with an error message. c) the same problems apply to triggers; implementing b) for triggers will be done later (will ask Dmitri). Additionally, as the binlog format is now changeable by each user for his session, I remove the implication which was done at startup, where row-based automatically set log-bin-trust-routine-creators to 1 (not possible anymore as a user can now switch to stmt-based and do nasty things again), and automatically set --innodb-locks-unsafe-for-binlog to 1 (was anyway theoretically incorrect as it disabled phantom protection). Plus fixes for compiler warnings.
2006-02-25 22:21:03 +01:00
# and now compare:
* Mixed replication mode * : 1) Fix for BUG#19630 "stored function inserting into two auto_increment breaks statement-based binlog": a stored function inserting into two such tables may fail to replicate (inserting wrong data in the slave's copy of the second table) if the slave's second table had an internal auto_increment counter different from master's. Because the auto_increment value autogenerated by master for the 2nd table does not go into binlog, only the first does, so the slave lacks information. To fix this, if running in mixed binlogging mode, if the stored function or trigger plans to update two different tables both having auto_increment columns, we switch to row-based for the whole function. We don't have a simple solution for statement-based binlogging mode, there the bug remains and will be documented as a known problem. Re-enabling rpl_switch_stm_row_mixed. 2) Fix for BUG#20630 "Mixed binlogging mode does not work with stored functions, triggers, views", which was a documented limitation (in mixed mode, we didn't detect that a stored function's execution needed row-based binlogging (due to some UUID() call for example); same for triggers, same for views (a view created from a SELECT UUID(), and doing INSERT INTO sometable SELECT theview; would not replicate row-based). This is implemented by, after parsing a routine's body, remembering in sp_head that this routine needs row-based binlogging. Then when this routine is used, the caller is marked to require row-based binlogging too. Same for views: when we parse a view and detect that its SELECT needs row-based binary logging, we mark the calling LEX as such. 3) Fix for BUG#20499 "mixed mode with temporary table breaks binlog": a temporary table containing e.g. UUID has its changes not binlogged, so any query updating a permanent table with data from the temporary table will run wrongly on slave. Solution: in mixed mode we don't switch back from row-based to statement-based when there exists temporary tables. 4) Attempt to test mysqlbinlog on a binlog generated by mysqlbinlog; impossible due to BUG#11312 and BUG#20329, but test is in place for when they are fixed.
2006-07-09 17:00:47 +02:00
connection master;
# first check that data on master is sensible
select count(*) from t1;
select count(*) from t2;
select count(*) from t3;
select count(*) from t4;
select count(*) from t5;
* Mixed replication mode * : 1) Fix for BUG#19630 "stored function inserting into two auto_increment breaks statement-based binlog": a stored function inserting into two such tables may fail to replicate (inserting wrong data in the slave's copy of the second table) if the slave's second table had an internal auto_increment counter different from master's. Because the auto_increment value autogenerated by master for the 2nd table does not go into binlog, only the first does, so the slave lacks information. To fix this, if running in mixed binlogging mode, if the stored function or trigger plans to update two different tables both having auto_increment columns, we switch to row-based for the whole function. We don't have a simple solution for statement-based binlogging mode, there the bug remains and will be documented as a known problem. Re-enabling rpl_switch_stm_row_mixed. 2) Fix for BUG#20630 "Mixed binlogging mode does not work with stored functions, triggers, views", which was a documented limitation (in mixed mode, we didn't detect that a stored function's execution needed row-based binlogging (due to some UUID() call for example); same for triggers, same for views (a view created from a SELECT UUID(), and doing INSERT INTO sometable SELECT theview; would not replicate row-based). This is implemented by, after parsing a routine's body, remembering in sp_head that this routine needs row-based binlogging. Then when this routine is used, the caller is marked to require row-based binlogging too. Same for views: when we parse a view and detect that its SELECT needs row-based binary logging, we mark the calling LEX as such. 3) Fix for BUG#20499 "mixed mode with temporary table breaks binlog": a temporary table containing e.g. UUID has its changes not binlogged, so any query updating a permanent table with data from the temporary table will run wrongly on slave. Solution: in mixed mode we don't switch back from row-based to statement-based when there exists temporary tables. 4) Attempt to test mysqlbinlog on a binlog generated by mysqlbinlog; impossible due to BUG#11312 and BUG#20329, but test is in place for when they are fixed.
2006-07-09 17:00:47 +02:00
select count(*) from t11;
select count(*) from t20;
select count(*) from t21;
select count(*) from t22;
select count(*) from t12;
select count(*) from t13;
select count(*) from t14;
* Mixed replication mode * : 1) Fix for BUG#19630 "stored function inserting into two auto_increment breaks statement-based binlog": a stored function inserting into two such tables may fail to replicate (inserting wrong data in the slave's copy of the second table) if the slave's second table had an internal auto_increment counter different from master's. Because the auto_increment value autogenerated by master for the 2nd table does not go into binlog, only the first does, so the slave lacks information. To fix this, if running in mixed binlogging mode, if the stored function or trigger plans to update two different tables both having auto_increment columns, we switch to row-based for the whole function. We don't have a simple solution for statement-based binlogging mode, there the bug remains and will be documented as a known problem. Re-enabling rpl_switch_stm_row_mixed. 2) Fix for BUG#20630 "Mixed binlogging mode does not work with stored functions, triggers, views", which was a documented limitation (in mixed mode, we didn't detect that a stored function's execution needed row-based binlogging (due to some UUID() call for example); same for triggers, same for views (a view created from a SELECT UUID(), and doing INSERT INTO sometable SELECT theview; would not replicate row-based). This is implemented by, after parsing a routine's body, remembering in sp_head that this routine needs row-based binlogging. Then when this routine is used, the caller is marked to require row-based binlogging too. Same for views: when we parse a view and detect that its SELECT needs row-based binary logging, we mark the calling LEX as such. 3) Fix for BUG#20499 "mixed mode with temporary table breaks binlog": a temporary table containing e.g. UUID has its changes not binlogged, so any query updating a permanent table with data from the temporary table will run wrongly on slave. Solution: in mixed mode we don't switch back from row-based to statement-based when there exists temporary tables. 4) Attempt to test mysqlbinlog on a binlog generated by mysqlbinlog; impossible due to BUG#11312 and BUG#20329, but test is in place for when they are fixed.
2006-07-09 17:00:47 +02:00
select count(*) from t16;
if ($you_want_to_test_UDF)
{
select count(*) from t6;
select count(*) from t7;
select count(*) from t8;
select count(*) from t9;
}
sync_slave_with_master;
#
# Bug#20863 If binlog format is changed between update and unlock of
# tables, wrong binlog
#
connection master;
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS t11;
SET SESSION BINLOG_FORMAT=STATEMENT;
CREATE TABLE t11 (song VARCHAR(255));
LOCK TABLES t11 WRITE;
SET SESSION BINLOG_FORMAT=ROW;
INSERT INTO t11 VALUES('Several Species of Small Furry Animals Gathered Together in a Cave and Grooving With a Pict');
SET SESSION BINLOG_FORMAT=STATEMENT;
INSERT INTO t11 VALUES('Careful With That Axe, Eugene');
UNLOCK TABLES;
--query_vertical SELECT * FROM t11
WL#2977 and WL#2712 global and session-level variable to set the binlog format (row/statement), and new binlog format called "mixed" (which is statement-based except if only row-based is correct, in this cset it means if UDF or UUID is used; more cases could be added in later 5.1 release): SET GLOBAL|SESSION BINLOG_FORMAT=row|statement|mixed|default; the global default is statement unless cluster is enabled (then it's row) as in 5.1-alpha. It's not possible to use SET on this variable if a session is currently in row-based mode and has open temporary tables (because CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE was not binlogged so temp table is not known on slave), or if NDB is enabled (because NDB does not support such change on-the-fly, though it will later), of if in a stored function (see below). The added tests test the possibility or impossibility to SET, their effects, and the mixed mode, including in prepared statements and in stored procedures and functions. Caveats: a) The mixed mode will not work for stored functions: in mixed mode, a stored function will always be binlogged as one call and in a statement-based way (e.g. INSERT VALUES(myfunc()) or SELECT myfunc()). b) for the same reason, changing the thread's binlog format inside a stored function is refused with an error message. c) the same problems apply to triggers; implementing b) for triggers will be done later (will ask Dmitri). Additionally, as the binlog format is now changeable by each user for his session, I remove the implication which was done at startup, where row-based automatically set log-bin-trust-routine-creators to 1 (not possible anymore as a user can now switch to stmt-based and do nasty things again), and automatically set --innodb-locks-unsafe-for-binlog to 1 (was anyway theoretically incorrect as it disabled phantom protection). Plus fixes for compiler warnings.
2006-02-25 22:21:03 +01:00
sync_slave_with_master;
USE mysqltest1;
--query_vertical SELECT * FROM t11
connection master;
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS t12;
SET SESSION BINLOG_FORMAT=MIXED;
CREATE TABLE t12 (data LONG);
LOCK TABLES t12 WRITE;
INSERT INTO t12 VALUES(UUID());
UNLOCK TABLES;
--replace_column 2 # 5 #
--replace_regex /table_id: [0-9]+/table_id: #/
WL#2977 and WL#2712 global and session-level variable to set the binlog format (row/statement), and new binlog format called "mixed" (which is statement-based except if only row-based is correct, in this cset it means if UDF or UUID is used; more cases could be added in later 5.1 release): SET GLOBAL|SESSION BINLOG_FORMAT=row|statement|mixed|default; the global default is statement unless cluster is enabled (then it's row) as in 5.1-alpha. It's not possible to use SET on this variable if a session is currently in row-based mode and has open temporary tables (because CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE was not binlogged so temp table is not known on slave), or if NDB is enabled (because NDB does not support such change on-the-fly, though it will later), of if in a stored function (see below). The added tests test the possibility or impossibility to SET, their effects, and the mixed mode, including in prepared statements and in stored procedures and functions. Caveats: a) The mixed mode will not work for stored functions: in mixed mode, a stored function will always be binlogged as one call and in a statement-based way (e.g. INSERT VALUES(myfunc()) or SELECT myfunc()). b) for the same reason, changing the thread's binlog format inside a stored function is refused with an error message. c) the same problems apply to triggers; implementing b) for triggers will be done later (will ask Dmitri). Additionally, as the binlog format is now changeable by each user for his session, I remove the implication which was done at startup, where row-based automatically set log-bin-trust-routine-creators to 1 (not possible anymore as a user can now switch to stmt-based and do nasty things again), and automatically set --innodb-locks-unsafe-for-binlog to 1 (was anyway theoretically incorrect as it disabled phantom protection). Plus fixes for compiler warnings.
2006-02-25 22:21:03 +01:00
show binlog events from 102;
sync_slave_with_master;
WL#2977 and WL#2712 global and session-level variable to set the binlog format (row/statement), and new binlog format called "mixed" (which is statement-based except if only row-based is correct, in this cset it means if UDF or UUID is used; more cases could be added in later 5.1 release): SET GLOBAL|SESSION BINLOG_FORMAT=row|statement|mixed|default; the global default is statement unless cluster is enabled (then it's row) as in 5.1-alpha. It's not possible to use SET on this variable if a session is currently in row-based mode and has open temporary tables (because CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE was not binlogged so temp table is not known on slave), or if NDB is enabled (because NDB does not support such change on-the-fly, though it will later), of if in a stored function (see below). The added tests test the possibility or impossibility to SET, their effects, and the mixed mode, including in prepared statements and in stored procedures and functions. Caveats: a) The mixed mode will not work for stored functions: in mixed mode, a stored function will always be binlogged as one call and in a statement-based way (e.g. INSERT VALUES(myfunc()) or SELECT myfunc()). b) for the same reason, changing the thread's binlog format inside a stored function is refused with an error message. c) the same problems apply to triggers; implementing b) for triggers will be done later (will ask Dmitri). Additionally, as the binlog format is now changeable by each user for his session, I remove the implication which was done at startup, where row-based automatically set log-bin-trust-routine-creators to 1 (not possible anymore as a user can now switch to stmt-based and do nasty things again), and automatically set --innodb-locks-unsafe-for-binlog to 1 (was anyway theoretically incorrect as it disabled phantom protection). Plus fixes for compiler warnings.
2006-02-25 22:21:03 +01:00
# as we're using UUID we don't SELECT but use "diff" like in rpl_row_UUID
--exec $MYSQL_DUMP --compact --order-by-primary --skip-extended-insert --no-create-info mysqltest1 > $MYSQLTEST_VARDIR/tmp/rpl_switch_stm_row_mixed_master.sql
--exec $MYSQL_DUMP_SLAVE --compact --order-by-primary --skip-extended-insert --no-create-info mysqltest1 > $MYSQLTEST_VARDIR/tmp/rpl_switch_stm_row_mixed_slave.sql
WL#2977 and WL#2712 global and session-level variable to set the binlog format (row/statement), and new binlog format called "mixed" (which is statement-based except if only row-based is correct, in this cset it means if UDF or UUID is used; more cases could be added in later 5.1 release): SET GLOBAL|SESSION BINLOG_FORMAT=row|statement|mixed|default; the global default is statement unless cluster is enabled (then it's row) as in 5.1-alpha. It's not possible to use SET on this variable if a session is currently in row-based mode and has open temporary tables (because CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE was not binlogged so temp table is not known on slave), or if NDB is enabled (because NDB does not support such change on-the-fly, though it will later), of if in a stored function (see below). The added tests test the possibility or impossibility to SET, their effects, and the mixed mode, including in prepared statements and in stored procedures and functions. Caveats: a) The mixed mode will not work for stored functions: in mixed mode, a stored function will always be binlogged as one call and in a statement-based way (e.g. INSERT VALUES(myfunc()) or SELECT myfunc()). b) for the same reason, changing the thread's binlog format inside a stored function is refused with an error message. c) the same problems apply to triggers; implementing b) for triggers will be done later (will ask Dmitri). Additionally, as the binlog format is now changeable by each user for his session, I remove the implication which was done at startup, where row-based automatically set log-bin-trust-routine-creators to 1 (not possible anymore as a user can now switch to stmt-based and do nasty things again), and automatically set --innodb-locks-unsafe-for-binlog to 1 (was anyway theoretically incorrect as it disabled phantom protection). Plus fixes for compiler warnings.
2006-02-25 22:21:03 +01:00
# Let's compare. Note: If they match test will pass, if they do not match
# the test will show that the diff statement failed and not reject file
# will be created. You will need to go to the mysql-test dir and diff
# the files your self to see what is not matching
--exec diff $MYSQLTEST_VARDIR/tmp/rpl_switch_stm_row_mixed_master.sql $MYSQLTEST_VARDIR/tmp/rpl_switch_stm_row_mixed_slave.sql;
* Mixed replication mode * : 1) Fix for BUG#19630 "stored function inserting into two auto_increment breaks statement-based binlog": a stored function inserting into two such tables may fail to replicate (inserting wrong data in the slave's copy of the second table) if the slave's second table had an internal auto_increment counter different from master's. Because the auto_increment value autogenerated by master for the 2nd table does not go into binlog, only the first does, so the slave lacks information. To fix this, if running in mixed binlogging mode, if the stored function or trigger plans to update two different tables both having auto_increment columns, we switch to row-based for the whole function. We don't have a simple solution for statement-based binlogging mode, there the bug remains and will be documented as a known problem. Re-enabling rpl_switch_stm_row_mixed. 2) Fix for BUG#20630 "Mixed binlogging mode does not work with stored functions, triggers, views", which was a documented limitation (in mixed mode, we didn't detect that a stored function's execution needed row-based binlogging (due to some UUID() call for example); same for triggers, same for views (a view created from a SELECT UUID(), and doing INSERT INTO sometable SELECT theview; would not replicate row-based). This is implemented by, after parsing a routine's body, remembering in sp_head that this routine needs row-based binlogging. Then when this routine is used, the caller is marked to require row-based binlogging too. Same for views: when we parse a view and detect that its SELECT needs row-based binary logging, we mark the calling LEX as such. 3) Fix for BUG#20499 "mixed mode with temporary table breaks binlog": a temporary table containing e.g. UUID has its changes not binlogged, so any query updating a permanent table with data from the temporary table will run wrongly on slave. Solution: in mixed mode we don't switch back from row-based to statement-based when there exists temporary tables. 4) Attempt to test mysqlbinlog on a binlog generated by mysqlbinlog; impossible due to BUG#11312 and BUG#20329, but test is in place for when they are fixed.
2006-07-09 17:00:47 +02:00
connection master;
--replace_column 2 # 5 #
--replace_regex /table_id: [0-9]+/table_id: #/
* Mixed replication mode * : 1) Fix for BUG#19630 "stored function inserting into two auto_increment breaks statement-based binlog": a stored function inserting into two such tables may fail to replicate (inserting wrong data in the slave's copy of the second table) if the slave's second table had an internal auto_increment counter different from master's. Because the auto_increment value autogenerated by master for the 2nd table does not go into binlog, only the first does, so the slave lacks information. To fix this, if running in mixed binlogging mode, if the stored function or trigger plans to update two different tables both having auto_increment columns, we switch to row-based for the whole function. We don't have a simple solution for statement-based binlogging mode, there the bug remains and will be documented as a known problem. Re-enabling rpl_switch_stm_row_mixed. 2) Fix for BUG#20630 "Mixed binlogging mode does not work with stored functions, triggers, views", which was a documented limitation (in mixed mode, we didn't detect that a stored function's execution needed row-based binlogging (due to some UUID() call for example); same for triggers, same for views (a view created from a SELECT UUID(), and doing INSERT INTO sometable SELECT theview; would not replicate row-based). This is implemented by, after parsing a routine's body, remembering in sp_head that this routine needs row-based binlogging. Then when this routine is used, the caller is marked to require row-based binlogging too. Same for views: when we parse a view and detect that its SELECT needs row-based binary logging, we mark the calling LEX as such. 3) Fix for BUG#20499 "mixed mode with temporary table breaks binlog": a temporary table containing e.g. UUID has its changes not binlogged, so any query updating a permanent table with data from the temporary table will run wrongly on slave. Solution: in mixed mode we don't switch back from row-based to statement-based when there exists temporary tables. 4) Attempt to test mysqlbinlog on a binlog generated by mysqlbinlog; impossible due to BUG#11312 and BUG#20329, but test is in place for when they are fixed.
2006-07-09 17:00:47 +02:00
show binlog events from 102;
# Now test that mysqlbinlog works fine on a binlog generated by the
# mixed mode
# BUG#11312 "DELIMITER is not written to the binary log that causes
# syntax error" makes that mysqlbinlog will fail if we pass it the
# text of queries; this forces us to use --base64-output here.
# BUG#20929 "BINLOG command causes invalid free plus assertion
# failure" makes mysqld segfault when receiving --base64-output
# So I can't enable this piece of test
# SIGH
if ($enable_when_11312_or_20929_fixed)
{
--exec $MYSQL_BINLOG --base64-output $MYSQLTEST_VARDIR/log/master-bin.000001 > $MYSQLTEST_VARDIR/tmp/mysqlbinlog_mixed.sql
drop database mysqltest1;
--exec $MYSQL < $MYSQLTEST_VARDIR/tmp/mysqlbinlog_mixed.sql
--exec $MYSQL_DUMP --compact --order-by-primary --skip-extended-insert --no-create-info mysqltest1 > $MYSQLTEST_VARDIR/tmp/rpl_switch_stm_row_mixed_master.sql
# the old mysqldump output on slave is the same as what it was on
# master before restoring on master.
--exec diff $MYSQLTEST_VARDIR/tmp/rpl_switch_stm_row_mixed_master.sql $MYSQLTEST_VARDIR/tmp/rpl_switch_stm_row_mixed_slave.sql;
}
drop database mysqltest1;
sync_slave_with_master;