Auto Update 2024/02/15 06:26:24

This commit is contained in:
motikan2010-bot 2024-02-15 15:26:24 +09:00
parent a10c02d54b
commit 39f206aed4
24 changed files with 109 additions and 74 deletions

View file

@ -13,10 +13,10 @@
"description": "CVE-2006-2842 is a powerful scanner for bug bounty hunters and penetration testers to discover vulnerabilities in their web applications.",
"fork": false,
"created_at": "2023-12-28T15:17:56Z",
"updated_at": "2023-12-29T08:12:01Z",
"updated_at": "2024-02-15T03:17:19Z",
"pushed_at": "2023-12-28T15:24:51Z",
"stargazers_count": 1,
"watchers_count": 1,
"stargazers_count": 2,
"watchers_count": 2,
"has_discussions": false,
"forks_count": 0,
"allow_forking": true,
@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
"topics": [],
"visibility": "public",
"forks": 0,
"watchers": 1,
"watchers": 2,
"score": 0,
"subscribers_count": 1
}

View file

@ -78,13 +78,13 @@
"stargazers_count": 202,
"watchers_count": 202,
"has_discussions": false,
"forks_count": 125,
"forks_count": 126,
"allow_forking": true,
"is_template": false,
"web_commit_signoff_required": false,
"topics": [],
"visibility": "public",
"forks": 125,
"forks": 126,
"watchers": 202,
"score": 0,
"subscribers_count": 18

File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long

View file

@ -13,10 +13,10 @@
"description": "Exploit of CVE-2019-8942 and CVE-2019-8943 ",
"fork": false,
"created_at": "2021-02-01T12:47:28Z",
"updated_at": "2024-02-06T19:26:08Z",
"updated_at": "2024-02-15T02:20:24Z",
"pushed_at": "2021-02-02T15:46:22Z",
"stargazers_count": 17,
"watchers_count": 17,
"stargazers_count": 18,
"watchers_count": 18,
"has_discussions": false,
"forks_count": 7,
"allow_forking": true,
@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
"topics": [],
"visibility": "public",
"forks": 7,
"watchers": 17,
"watchers": 18,
"score": 0,
"subscribers_count": 1
},

View file

@ -446,10 +446,10 @@
"description": "PoC for triggering buffer overflow via CVE-2020-0796",
"fork": false,
"created_at": "2020-03-12T18:34:40Z",
"updated_at": "2024-02-06T02:45:12Z",
"updated_at": "2024-02-15T04:04:39Z",
"pushed_at": "2023-02-26T07:01:03Z",
"stargazers_count": 313,
"watchers_count": 313,
"stargazers_count": 314,
"watchers_count": 314,
"has_discussions": false,
"forks_count": 123,
"allow_forking": true,
@ -463,7 +463,7 @@
],
"visibility": "public",
"forks": 123,
"watchers": 313,
"watchers": 314,
"score": 0,
"subscribers_count": 19
},

View file

@ -145,13 +145,13 @@
"stargazers_count": 113,
"watchers_count": 113,
"has_discussions": false,
"forks_count": 39,
"forks_count": 38,
"allow_forking": true,
"is_template": false,
"web_commit_signoff_required": false,
"topics": [],
"visibility": "public",
"forks": 39,
"forks": 38,
"watchers": 113,
"score": 0,
"subscribers_count": 4

View file

@ -18,13 +18,13 @@
"stargazers_count": 1280,
"watchers_count": 1280,
"has_discussions": false,
"forks_count": 319,
"forks_count": 320,
"allow_forking": true,
"is_template": false,
"web_commit_signoff_required": false,
"topics": [],
"visibility": "public",
"forks": 319,
"forks": 320,
"watchers": 1280,
"score": 0,
"subscribers_count": 27

View file

@ -907,10 +907,10 @@
"description": "A Proof-Of-Concept for the CVE-2021-44228 vulnerability. ",
"fork": false,
"created_at": "2021-12-10T23:19:28Z",
"updated_at": "2024-02-14T19:36:04Z",
"updated_at": "2024-02-15T03:09:30Z",
"pushed_at": "2024-02-12T22:37:25Z",
"stargazers_count": 1707,
"watchers_count": 1707,
"stargazers_count": 1708,
"watchers_count": 1708,
"has_discussions": false,
"forks_count": 504,
"allow_forking": true,
@ -924,7 +924,7 @@
],
"visibility": "public",
"forks": 504,
"watchers": 1707,
"watchers": 1708,
"score": 0,
"subscribers_count": 27
},
@ -5230,10 +5230,10 @@
"description": "Tool that runs a test to check whether one of your applications is affected by the recent vulnerabilities in log4j: CVE-2021-44228 and CVE-2021-45046",
"fork": false,
"created_at": "2021-12-13T21:47:41Z",
"updated_at": "2024-01-31T02:26:06Z",
"updated_at": "2024-02-15T06:02:41Z",
"pushed_at": "2023-12-20T13:58:44Z",
"stargazers_count": 82,
"watchers_count": 82,
"stargazers_count": 83,
"watchers_count": 83,
"has_discussions": false,
"forks_count": 14,
"allow_forking": true,
@ -5250,7 +5250,7 @@
],
"visibility": "public",
"forks": 14,
"watchers": 82,
"watchers": 83,
"score": 0,
"subscribers_count": 4
},

View file

@ -2778,5 +2778,35 @@
"watchers": 0,
"score": 0,
"subscribers_count": 1
},
{
"id": 757803327,
"name": "CVE-2022-0847",
"full_name": "letsr00t\/CVE-2022-0847",
"owner": {
"login": "letsr00t",
"id": 38699989,
"avatar_url": "https:\/\/avatars.githubusercontent.com\/u\/38699989?v=4",
"html_url": "https:\/\/github.com\/letsr00t"
},
"html_url": "https:\/\/github.com\/letsr00t\/CVE-2022-0847",
"description": null,
"fork": false,
"created_at": "2024-02-15T02:27:27Z",
"updated_at": "2024-02-15T02:28:36Z",
"pushed_at": "2024-02-15T02:28:33Z",
"stargazers_count": 0,
"watchers_count": 0,
"has_discussions": false,
"forks_count": 0,
"allow_forking": true,
"is_template": false,
"web_commit_signoff_required": false,
"topics": [],
"visibility": "public",
"forks": 0,
"watchers": 0,
"score": 0,
"subscribers_count": 0
}
]

View file

@ -13,10 +13,10 @@
"description": "Full Chain Analysis of CVE-2022-4262, a non-trivial feedback slot type confusion in V8.",
"fork": false,
"created_at": "2023-07-13T13:17:20Z",
"updated_at": "2024-02-14T21:57:39Z",
"updated_at": "2024-02-15T01:03:22Z",
"pushed_at": "2024-02-11T03:01:51Z",
"stargazers_count": 58,
"watchers_count": 58,
"stargazers_count": 59,
"watchers_count": 59,
"has_discussions": false,
"forks_count": 10,
"allow_forking": true,
@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
"topics": [],
"visibility": "public",
"forks": 10,
"watchers": 58,
"watchers": 59,
"score": 0,
"subscribers_count": 2
},

View file

@ -43,10 +43,10 @@
"description": "TP-Link Archer AX21 - Unauthenticated Command Injection [Loader]",
"fork": false,
"created_at": "2023-09-09T15:53:22Z",
"updated_at": "2024-01-25T15:45:45Z",
"updated_at": "2024-02-15T05:04:00Z",
"pushed_at": "2023-09-09T15:58:39Z",
"stargazers_count": 6,
"watchers_count": 6,
"stargazers_count": 7,
"watchers_count": 7,
"has_discussions": false,
"forks_count": 2,
"allow_forking": true,
@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
"topics": [],
"visibility": "public",
"forks": 2,
"watchers": 6,
"watchers": 7,
"score": 0,
"subscribers_count": 1
}

View file

@ -111,10 +111,10 @@
"description": "Exploit for CVE-2023-26035 affecting ZoneMinder < 1.36.33 and < 1.37.33",
"fork": false,
"created_at": "2023-12-27T18:44:22Z",
"updated_at": "2023-12-27T18:45:10Z",
"updated_at": "2024-02-15T05:49:30Z",
"pushed_at": "2023-12-27T21:08:50Z",
"stargazers_count": 0,
"watchers_count": 0,
"stargazers_count": 1,
"watchers_count": 1,
"has_discussions": false,
"forks_count": 0,
"allow_forking": true,
@ -123,7 +123,7 @@
"topics": [],
"visibility": "public",
"forks": 0,
"watchers": 0,
"watchers": 1,
"score": 0,
"subscribers_count": 1
}

View file

@ -87,6 +87,6 @@
"forks": 0,
"watchers": 0,
"score": 0,
"subscribers_count": 0
"subscribers_count": 1
}
]

View file

@ -472,6 +472,6 @@
"forks": 0,
"watchers": 0,
"score": 0,
"subscribers_count": 0
"subscribers_count": 1
}
]

View file

@ -13,10 +13,10 @@
"description": "Proof-of-concept code for the Android APEX key reuse vulnerability described in https:\/\/rtx.meta.security\/exploitation\/2024\/01\/30\/Android-vendors-APEX-test-keys.html",
"fork": false,
"created_at": "2024-01-26T21:17:38Z",
"updated_at": "2024-02-13T07:56:53Z",
"updated_at": "2024-02-15T01:34:44Z",
"pushed_at": "2024-01-31T19:33:59Z",
"stargazers_count": 41,
"watchers_count": 41,
"stargazers_count": 42,
"watchers_count": 42,
"has_discussions": false,
"forks_count": 5,
"allow_forking": true,
@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
"topics": [],
"visibility": "public",
"forks": 5,
"watchers": 41,
"watchers": 42,
"score": 0,
"subscribers_count": 5
}

View file

@ -13,19 +13,19 @@
"description": "Exploits for GL.iNet CVE-2023-46454, CVE-2023-46455 and CVE-2023-46456",
"fork": false,
"created_at": "2023-12-08T01:45:16Z",
"updated_at": "2024-02-06T09:40:32Z",
"updated_at": "2024-02-15T02:08:56Z",
"pushed_at": "2023-12-08T04:35:40Z",
"stargazers_count": 2,
"watchers_count": 2,
"stargazers_count": 3,
"watchers_count": 3,
"has_discussions": false,
"forks_count": 0,
"forks_count": 1,
"allow_forking": true,
"is_template": false,
"web_commit_signoff_required": false,
"topics": [],
"visibility": "public",
"forks": 0,
"watchers": 2,
"forks": 1,
"watchers": 3,
"score": 0,
"subscribers_count": 1
}

View file

@ -629,6 +629,6 @@
"forks": 0,
"watchers": 1,
"score": 0,
"subscribers_count": 0
"subscribers_count": 1
}
]

View file

@ -13,10 +13,10 @@
"description": "CVE-2023-47464 POC",
"fork": false,
"created_at": "2024-02-14T15:39:34Z",
"updated_at": "2024-02-14T15:40:38Z",
"updated_at": "2024-02-15T03:55:27Z",
"pushed_at": "2024-02-14T15:43:30Z",
"stargazers_count": 0,
"watchers_count": 0,
"stargazers_count": 1,
"watchers_count": 1,
"has_discussions": false,
"forks_count": 0,
"allow_forking": true,
@ -25,8 +25,8 @@
"topics": [],
"visibility": "public",
"forks": 0,
"watchers": 0,
"watchers": 1,
"score": 0,
"subscribers_count": 0
"subscribers_count": 1
}
]

View file

@ -13,10 +13,10 @@
"description": "CVE-2024-21893: SSRF Vulnerability in Ivanti Connect Secure",
"fork": false,
"created_at": "2024-02-02T22:59:21Z",
"updated_at": "2024-02-14T15:23:11Z",
"updated_at": "2024-02-15T05:34:07Z",
"pushed_at": "2024-02-02T23:27:10Z",
"stargazers_count": 62,
"watchers_count": 62,
"stargazers_count": 63,
"watchers_count": 63,
"has_discussions": false,
"forks_count": 10,
"allow_forking": true,
@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
"topics": [],
"visibility": "public",
"forks": 10,
"watchers": 62,
"watchers": 63,
"score": 0,
"subscribers_count": 1
},

View file

@ -18,13 +18,13 @@
"stargazers_count": 18,
"watchers_count": 18,
"has_discussions": false,
"forks_count": 6,
"forks_count": 7,
"allow_forking": true,
"is_template": false,
"web_commit_signoff_required": false,
"topics": [],
"visibility": "public",
"forks": 6,
"forks": 7,
"watchers": 18,
"score": 0,
"subscribers_count": 2

View file

@ -13,10 +13,10 @@
"description": "Comprehensive Exploit Chain for Multiple Vulnerabilities in VinChin Backup & Recovery <= 7.2",
"fork": false,
"created_at": "2023-11-06T09:24:15Z",
"updated_at": "2024-02-02T07:03:41Z",
"updated_at": "2024-02-15T04:55:19Z",
"pushed_at": "2024-02-01T17:24:13Z",
"stargazers_count": 2,
"watchers_count": 2,
"stargazers_count": 3,
"watchers_count": 3,
"has_discussions": false,
"forks_count": 1,
"allow_forking": true,
@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
],
"visibility": "public",
"forks": 1,
"watchers": 2,
"watchers": 3,
"score": 0,
"subscribers_count": 1
}

View file

@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
"fork": false,
"created_at": "2024-02-09T12:22:08Z",
"updated_at": "2024-02-14T13:50:39Z",
"pushed_at": "2024-02-14T13:42:48Z",
"pushed_at": "2024-02-15T04:11:15Z",
"stargazers_count": 0,
"watchers_count": 0,
"has_discussions": false,
@ -27,6 +27,6 @@
"forks": 0,
"watchers": 0,
"score": 0,
"subscribers_count": 0
"subscribers_count": 1
}
]

View file

@ -27,6 +27,6 @@
"forks": 0,
"watchers": 0,
"score": 0,
"subscribers_count": 0
"subscribers_count": 1
}
]

View file

@ -7570,6 +7570,7 @@
- [ayushx007/CVE-2022-0847-dirty-pipe-checker](https://github.com/ayushx007/CVE-2022-0847-dirty-pipe-checker)
- [ayushx007/CVE-2022-0847-DirtyPipe-Exploits](https://github.com/ayushx007/CVE-2022-0847-DirtyPipe-Exploits)
- [solomon12354/CVE-2022-0847-Dirty_Pipe_virus](https://github.com/solomon12354/CVE-2022-0847-Dirty_Pipe_virus)
- [letsr00t/CVE-2022-0847](https://github.com/letsr00t/CVE-2022-0847)
### CVE-2022-0848 (2022-03-04)
@ -9215,7 +9216,11 @@
- [hadrian3689/phpipam_1.4.4](https://github.com/hadrian3689/phpipam_1.4.4)
- [bernauers/CVE-2022-23046](https://github.com/bernauers/CVE-2022-23046)
### CVE-2022-23093
### CVE-2022-23093 (-)
<code>ping reads raw IP packets from the network to process responses in the pr_pack() function. As part of processing a response ping has to reconstruct the IP header, the ICMP header and if present a &quot;quoted packet,&quot; which represents the packet that generated an ICMP error. The quoted packet again has an IP header and an ICMP header.\n\nThe pr_pack() copies received IP and ICMP headers into stack buffers for further processing. In so doing, it fails to take into account the possible presence of IP option headers following the IP header in either the response or the quoted packet. When IP options are present, pr_pack() overflows the destination buffer by up to 40 bytes.\n\nThe memory safety bugs described above can be triggered by a remote host, causing the ping program to crash.\n\nThe ping process runs in a capability mode sandbox on all affected versions of FreeBSD and is thus very constrained in how it can interact with the rest of the system at the point where the bug can occur.
</code>
- [Inplex-sys/CVE-2022-23093](https://github.com/Inplex-sys/CVE-2022-23093)
### CVE-2022-23131 (2022-01-13)