update messages with conformance statements (note the java files that have messages that have not been extracted to a properties file, these need to be factored out)
git-svn-id: http://svn.us.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany@918526 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
This commit is contained in:
parent
8457fd52b4
commit
a98606e9a9
3 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions
|
|
@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ abstract class BaseAssemblyProcessor extends BaseStAXArtifactProcessor {
|
|||
property.setXSDType(getQName(reader, TYPE));
|
||||
// MJE added 14/05/2009 - check for both @element and @type being present - disallowed by OASIS Assembly spec
|
||||
if( property.getXSDElement() != null && property.getXSDType() != null ) {
|
||||
ContributionReadException ce = new ContributionReadException("[ASM40010] Error: property has both @type and @element attribute values - " +
|
||||
ContributionReadException ce = new ContributionReadException("[ASM40010,ASM60040] Error: property has both @type and @element attribute values - " +
|
||||
property.getName());
|
||||
error(context.getMonitor(), "ContributionReadException", property, ce);
|
||||
} // end if
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -987,13 +987,13 @@ public class CompositeProcessor extends BaseAssemblyProcessor implements StAXArt
|
|||
composite.getIncludes().set(i, resolved);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
ContributionResolveException ce =
|
||||
new ContributionResolveException("Error: Composite " + composite.getName()
|
||||
new ContributionResolveException("[ASM60041] Error: Composite " + composite.getName()
|
||||
+ " can only include another composite with the identical @local attribute value");
|
||||
error(monitor, "ContributionResolveException", include, ce);
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
ContributionResolveException ce =
|
||||
new ContributionResolveException("Error: Composite " + include.getName()
|
||||
new ContributionResolveException("[ASM60042] Error: Composite " + include.getName()
|
||||
+ " is not a valid composite within the domain");
|
||||
error(monitor, "ContributionResolveException", include, ce);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ DuplicateComponentReferenceName = Duplicate component reference name: Component
|
|||
DuplicateComponentPropertyName = Duplicate component property name: Component = {0} Property = {1}
|
||||
NoComponentImplementation = No implementation for component: Component = {0}
|
||||
ServiceNotFoundForComponentService = Component type service not found for component service (missing @Remotable annotation?): Component = {0} Service = {1}
|
||||
UnresolvedComponentImplementation = Component implementation not resolved: Component = {0} Uri = {1}
|
||||
UnresolvedComponentImplementation = [ASM60030] Component implementation not resolved: Component = {0} Uri = {1}
|
||||
DuplicateImplementationPropertyName = [ASM40005,ASM60014] Duplicate implementation property name: Component = {0} Property = {1}
|
||||
DuplicateImplementationServiceName = [ASM40003,ASM60003] Duplicate implementation service name: Component = {0} Service = {1}
|
||||
DuplicateImplementationReferenceName = [ASM40004,ASM50007,ASM60006] Duplicate implementation reference name: Component = {0} Reference = {1}
|
||||
|
|
@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ PropertyFileValueInvalid = The property file {0} for property {1} in component {
|
|||
PolicyRelatedException = Policy Related Exception occured due to : {0}
|
||||
IntentNotFound = Intent {0} is not defined in SCA definitions
|
||||
PolicySetNotFound = PolicySet {0} is not defined in SCA definitions
|
||||
MutuallyExclusiveIntents = [POL40009] Intent {0} and {1} are mutually exclusive
|
||||
MutuallyExclusiveIntents = [POL40009,ASM60009,ASM60010] Intent {0} and {1} are mutually exclusive
|
||||
PropertyXpathExpressionReturnedNull = The property XPath expression for component {0} property {1} expression {2} did not match anything in the source property
|
||||
PropertyHasManyValues = [ASM50032] The property component {0} property {1} has many values but its "many" attribute is set to false
|
||||
PropertXSDTypesDontMatch = [ASM_5036] The property component {0} property {1} has XSD type {2} while its component type property has the XSD type {3}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue