More correctly handle the jms uri format of the binding. Still needs more work as there jms uri can be quite complicated and has a whole spec of its own that we should implement

git-svn-id: http://svn.us.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany@984756 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

1 files changed, 8 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/binding-jms/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/binding/jms/JMSBinding.java b/sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/binding-jms/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/binding/jms/JMSBinding.java
index 7480d8fe17..39ffbfb854 100644
--- a/sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/binding-jms/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/binding/jms/JMSBinding.java
+++ b/sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/binding-jms/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/binding/jms/JMSBinding.java
@@ -150,6 +150,7 @@ public class JMSBinding implements Binding, PolicySubject, OperationsConfigurato
     private WireFormat responseWireFormat;
     private OperationSelector operationSelector;
     private ExtensionType extensionType;
+    private String jmsURI;
     
     public JMSBinding() {
         super();
@@ -971,4 +972,11 @@ public class JMSBinding implements Binding, PolicySubject, OperationsConfigurato
     public void setExtensionType(ExtensionType intentAttachPointType) {
         this.extensionType = intentAttachPointType;
     }
+
+    public String getJMSURI() {
+        return jmsURI;
+    }
+    public void setJMSURI(String jmsURI) {
+        this.jmsURI = jmsURI;
+    }
 }