summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/sca-java-2.x/tags/2.0.1-RC1/modules/policy-wspolicy/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/policy/wspolicy/WSPolicyBuilder.java
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'sca-java-2.x/tags/2.0.1-RC1/modules/policy-wspolicy/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/policy/wspolicy/WSPolicyBuilder.java')
-rw-r--r--sca-java-2.x/tags/2.0.1-RC1/modules/policy-wspolicy/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/policy/wspolicy/WSPolicyBuilder.java173
1 files changed, 173 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/sca-java-2.x/tags/2.0.1-RC1/modules/policy-wspolicy/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/policy/wspolicy/WSPolicyBuilder.java b/sca-java-2.x/tags/2.0.1-RC1/modules/policy-wspolicy/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/policy/wspolicy/WSPolicyBuilder.java
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..d6bd710ed9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/sca-java-2.x/tags/2.0.1-RC1/modules/policy-wspolicy/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/policy/wspolicy/WSPolicyBuilder.java
@@ -0,0 +1,173 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+ * software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+ * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+ * KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the
+ * specific language governing permissions and limitations
+ * under the License.
+ */
+
+package org.apache.tuscany.sca.policy.wspolicy;
+
+import java.util.ArrayList;
+import java.util.List;
+
+import javax.xml.namespace.QName;
+
+import org.apache.neethi.Policy;
+import org.apache.tuscany.sca.assembly.Component;
+import org.apache.tuscany.sca.assembly.Endpoint;
+import org.apache.tuscany.sca.assembly.EndpointReference;
+import org.apache.tuscany.sca.assembly.Implementation;
+import org.apache.tuscany.sca.assembly.builder.BuilderContext;
+import org.apache.tuscany.sca.assembly.builder.PolicyBuilder;
+import org.apache.tuscany.sca.policy.PolicyExpression;
+import org.apache.tuscany.sca.policy.PolicySet;
+import org.apache.tuscany.sca.policy.PolicySubject;
+
+/**
+ * Processing for WS-Policy objects
+ * TBD
+ */
+public class WSPolicyBuilder implements PolicyBuilder<Policy> {
+
+ public boolean build(Endpoint endpoint, BuilderContext context) {
+ List<WSPolicy> polices = getPolicies(endpoint);
+ System.out.println(endpoint + ": " + polices);
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ public boolean build(EndpointReference endpointReference, BuilderContext context) {
+ List<WSPolicy> polices = getPolicies(endpointReference);
+ System.out.println(endpointReference + ": " + polices);
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ public boolean build(Component component, Implementation implementation, BuilderContext context) {
+ List<WSPolicy> polices = getPolicies(implementation);
+ System.out.println(implementation + ": " + polices);
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ public QName getPolicyType() {
+ return WSPolicy.WS_POLICY_QNAME;
+ }
+
+ public List<QName> getSupportedBindings() {
+ return null;
+ }
+
+ public boolean build(EndpointReference endpointReference, Endpoint endpoint, BuilderContext context) {
+
+ // TODO - neethi doesn't include code for matching ws policy
+ // cxf have the class Intersector http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/trunk/api/src/main/java/org/apache/cxf/ws/policy/Intersector.java
+ // but this does its work based on the cxf AssertionBuilders and extension
+ // registry mechanism. I don't want to commit to that at the moment.
+ //
+ // At the moment we do the simplest top level QName based matching
+
+ // match EPR policy sets
+ for (PolicySet eprPolicySet : endpointReference.getPolicySets()){
+ for (PolicySet epPolicySet : endpoint.getPolicySets()){
+ if (!build(eprPolicySet, epPolicySet)){
+ return false;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ // match EP policy sets
+ for (PolicySet epPolicySet : endpoint.getPolicySets()){
+ for (PolicySet eprPolicySet : endpointReference.getPolicySets()){
+ if (!build(epPolicySet, eprPolicySet)){
+ return false;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ private boolean build(PolicySet policySet1, PolicySet policySet2){
+
+ // extract the ws policy expressions out of the policy sets
+ List<PolicyExpression> policyExpressions1 = new ArrayList<PolicyExpression>();
+ List<PolicyExpression> policyExpressions2 = new ArrayList<PolicyExpression>();
+
+ for (PolicyExpression policyExpression : policySet1.getPolicies()){
+ if (policyExpression.getName().equals(getPolicyType())){
+ policyExpressions1.add(policyExpression);
+ }
+ }
+
+ for (PolicyExpression policyExpression : policySet2.getPolicies()){
+ if (policyExpression.getName().equals(getPolicyType())){
+ policyExpressions2.add(policyExpression);
+ }
+ }
+
+ // Match the first set of expressions against the second set
+ for (PolicyExpression policyExpression1 : policyExpressions1){
+ for (PolicyExpression policyExpression2 : policyExpressions2){
+ if (!build((WSPolicy)policyExpression1.getPolicy(),
+ (WSPolicy)policyExpression2.getPolicy())){
+ return false;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ // TODO set the reference policy set to include an interception of the
+ // ws policy sets discovered here
+ // Do we really need to do this?
+ // The method is called in both directions (reference to service and
+ // service to reference) so would need to fix that
+
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ private List<WSPolicy> getPolicies(PolicySubject subject) {
+ List<WSPolicy> polices = new ArrayList<WSPolicy>();
+ for (PolicySet ps : subject.getPolicySets()) {
+ for (PolicyExpression exp : ps.getPolicies()) {
+ if (getPolicyType().equals(exp.getName())) {
+ polices.add((WSPolicy)exp.getPolicy());
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ return polices;
+ }
+
+ private boolean build(WSPolicy wsPolicy1, WSPolicy wsPolicy2){
+ // TODO - cheating here as we assume a flat policy structure
+ // we've read all the policy assertions into Tuscany models
+ // in the reader (without taking account of alternatives)
+ // so we just compare those here
+ // The real implementation of this comparison depends on how
+ // we decide to represent the ws policy hierarchy
+
+ for (Object policyAssertion1 : wsPolicy1.getPolicyAssertions()){
+ boolean matched = false;
+ for (Object policyAssertion2 : wsPolicy2.getPolicyAssertions()){
+ if (policyAssertion1.getClass() == policyAssertion2.getClass()){
+ matched = true;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ if(!matched){
+ return false;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return true;
+ }
+
+}