1 files changed, 229 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/sca-java-2.x/tags/2.0.1-RC1/modules/binding-jms-runtime/src/test/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/binding/jms/OperationSelectionTestCaseFIXME.java b/sca-java-2.x/tags/2.0.1-RC1/modules/binding-jms-runtime/src/test/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/binding/jms/OperationSelectionTestCaseFIXME.java
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..5b59389a18
--- /dev/null
+++ b/sca-java-2.x/tags/2.0.1-RC1/modules/binding-jms-runtime/src/test/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/binding/jms/OperationSelectionTestCaseFIXME.java
@@ -0,0 +1,229 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ * 
+ *   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ * 
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+ * software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+ * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+ * KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
+ * specific language governing permissions and limitations
+ * under the License.    
+ */
+package org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.jms;
+
+import java.util.ArrayList;
+import java.util.List;
+
+import org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.jms.provider.JMSResourceFactory;
+import org.apache.tuscany.sca.interfacedef.Operation;
+import org.apache.tuscany.sca.interfacedef.impl.OperationImpl;
+import org.junit.Test;
+
+/**
+ * This unit test is used to ensure that a JMS Message delivered to a Component will select the correct operation based
+ * on the details in section 1.5 of the JMS Binding specification.
+ *
+ * @version $Rev$ $Date$
+ */
+public class OperationSelectionTestCaseFIXME {
+    /**
+     * This test attempts to invoke a Service with a Single method where scaOperationName is not specified in the JMS
+     * Message
+     * <p>
+     * Expected behaviour is that the single method will be invoked as scaOperationName is ignored
+     * 
+     * @throws Exception Failed
+     */
+    @Test
+    public void testServiceWithOnlyOneOperationScaOperationNameNotSpecified() throws Exception {
+        // Create the operation we should match
+        final Operation expectedOperation = newOperation("myOperation");
+
+        // Create the list of operations for the Service
+        final List<Operation> operations = new ArrayList<Operation>();
+        operations.add(expectedOperation);
+
+        // The name of the Operation in the JMS Message - not specified
+        final String scaOperationName = null;
+
+        // Do the test
+        doTestJMSBinding(expectedOperation, operations, scaOperationName);
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * This test attempts to invoke a Service with a Single method where scaOperationName in the JMS Message matches the
+     * method name on the Service
+     * <p>
+     * Expected behaviour is that the single method will be invoked as scaOperationName is ignored
+     * 
+     * @throws Exception Failed
+     */
+    @Test
+    public void testServiceWithOnlyOneOperationScaOperationNameMatches() throws Exception {
+        // Create the operation we should match
+        final Operation expectedOperation = newOperation("myOperation");
+
+        // Create the list of operations for the Service
+        final List<Operation> operations = new ArrayList<Operation>();
+        operations.add(expectedOperation);
+
+        // The name of the Operation in the JMS Message - matches operation name
+        final String scaOperationName = expectedOperation.getName();
+
+        // Do the test
+        doTestJMSBinding(expectedOperation, operations, scaOperationName);
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * This test attempts to invoke a Service with a Single method where scaOperationName in the JMS Message is
+     * different the method name on the Service
+     * <p>
+     * Expected behaviour is that the single method will be invoked as scaOperationName is ignored
+     * 
+     * @throws Exception Failed
+     */
+    @Test
+    public void testServiceWithOnlyOneOperationScaOperationNameDifferent() throws Exception {
+        // Create the operation we should match
+        final Operation expectedOperation = newOperation("myOperation");
+
+        // Create the list of operations for the Service
+        final List<Operation> operations = new ArrayList<Operation>();
+        operations.add(expectedOperation);
+
+        // The name of the Operation in the JMS Message - different to operation name
+        final String scaOperationName = "Does Not Match Opeation Name";
+
+        // Do the test
+        doTestJMSBinding(expectedOperation, operations, scaOperationName);
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * This test attempts to invoke a Service with a multiple operations where scaOperationName specified in the JMS
+     * Message matches an operation name
+     * <p>
+     * Expected behaviour is that the named method will be invoked.
+     * 
+     * @throws Exception Failed
+     */
+    @Test
+    public void testServiceWithMultipleOperationsScaOperationNameSpecified() throws Exception {
+        // Create the list of operations for the Service
+        final List<Operation> operations = new ArrayList<Operation>();
+        for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
+            operations.add(newOperation("operation" + i));
+        }
+
+        // Now try and invoke each operation
+        for (Operation expectedOperation : operations) {
+            // The name of the Operation in the JMS Message
+            final String scaOperationName = expectedOperation.getName();
+
+            // Do the test
+            doTestJMSBinding(expectedOperation, operations, scaOperationName);
+        }
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * This test attempts to invoke a Service with a multiple operations where scaOperationName specified in the JMS
+     * Message is not set so we invoke the onMessage() method
+     * <p>
+     * Expected behaviour is that the onMessage() method should be used instead
+     * 
+     * @throws Exception Failed
+     */
+    @Test
+    public void testServiceWithMultipleOperationsScaOperationNotSpecified() throws Exception {
+        // Create the list of operations for the Service
+        final List<Operation> operations = new ArrayList<Operation>();
+        for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
+            operations.add(newOperation("operation" + i));
+        }
+
+        // Add the onMessage operation to the Service Contract
+        final Operation onMessageOperation = newOperation("onMessage");
+        operations.add(onMessageOperation);
+
+        // The name of the Operation in the JMS Message is not set so it will attempt
+        // to invoke the onMessage() method
+        final String scaOperationName = null;
+
+        // Do the test
+        doTestJMSBinding(onMessageOperation, operations, scaOperationName);
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * This is the test method that will attempt to unit test invoking a Service with the specified operations using a
+     * JMS Message with the specified scaOperationName to ensure that it invokes the expectedOperation
+     * 
+     * @param expectedOperation The Operation we are expecting to be invoked over JMS
+     * @param operations The list of Operations supported by the Service
+     * @param scaOperationName The value to set scaOperationName in the JMS Message
+     * @throws Exception Failed
+     */
+    private void doTestJMSBinding(Operation expectedOperation, List<Operation> operations, String scaOperationName)
+        throws Exception {
+        // Create the test JMS Binding
+        final JMSBinding jmsBinding = new JMSBinding();
+        JMSResourceFactory jmsResourceFactory = null;
+
+        // Extra information for the method we are invoking
+        final String operationParams = "Hello";
+        final Object operationReturnValue = "Operation Success";
+
+        // Mock up the Service. Basically, it is going to call:
+        // List<Operation> opList = service.getInterfaceContract().getInterface().getOperations();
+//        final InterfaceContract ifaceContract = EasyMock.createStrictMock(InterfaceContract.class);
+//        final RuntimeComponentService service = EasyMock.createStrictMock(RuntimeComponentService.class);
+//        final Interface iface = EasyMock.createStrictMock(Interface.class);
+//        EasyMock.expect(iface.getOperations()).andReturn(operations);
+//        EasyMock.expect(ifaceContract.getInterface()).andReturn(iface);
+//        EasyMock.expect(service.getInterfaceContract()).andReturn(ifaceContract);
+//
+//        // Mock up getting and invoking the RuntimeWire. It is going to call:
+//        // service.getRuntimeWire(jmsBinding).invoke(operation, (Object[])requestPayload);
+//        final RuntimeWire runtimeWire = EasyMock.createStrictMock(RuntimeWire.class);
+//        EasyMock.expect(service.getRuntimeWire(jmsBinding)).andReturn(runtimeWire);
+//        EasyMock.expect(runtimeWire.invoke(expectedOperation, new Object[] {operationParams}))
+//            .andReturn(operationReturnValue);
+//
+//        // Create the JMS Binding Listener
+//      //  final DefaultJMSBindingListener bindingListener = new DefaultJMSBindingListener(jmsBinding, jmsResourceFactory, service, null);
+//
+//        // Simulate a message
+//        final TextMessage requestJMSMsg = EasyMock.createStrictMock(TextMessage.class);
+//        EasyMock.expect(requestJMSMsg.getStringProperty("scaOperationName")).andReturn(scaOperationName);
+//        EasyMock.expect(requestJMSMsg.getText()).andReturn(operationParams);
+//        EasyMock.expect(requestJMSMsg.getJMSReplyTo()).andReturn(null);
+//
+//        // Lets put all the mocks into replay mode
+//        // EasyMock.replay(iface);
+//        EasyMock.replay(ifaceContract);
+//        EasyMock.replay(service);
+//        EasyMock.replay(requestJMSMsg);
+//        EasyMock.replay(runtimeWire);
+
+        // Do the test
+     //   bindingListener.onMessage(requestJMSMsg);
+
+        // Verify our Mock objects
+        // EasyMock.verify(iface);
+        // EasyMock.verify(ifaceContract);
+        // EasyMock.verify(service);
+        // EasyMock.verify(requestJMSMsg);
+        // EasyMock.verify(runtimeWire);
+    }
+
+    private static Operation newOperation(String name) {
+        Operation operation = new OperationImpl();
+        operation.setName(name);
+        return operation;
+    }
+}